An evaluation of an advanced practice role in palliative radiation therapy

The extended and advanced clinical practices of radiographers worldwide: A scoping review

AIMS

This scoping review aimed to (1) map the global evidence on extended and advanced clinical practices (ACP) performed by radiographers, and (2) provide an overview of the pillars (clinical practice, leadership and management, education, and research) they relate to, as well as the radiology areas and the geographical location where they were developed.

METHODS

Articles were searched in MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase, and grey literature in ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. Studies concerning radiographers or healthcare professionals with an equivalent title (e.g., radiation technologist) performing extended role or an ACP, regardless of their medical imaging setting or country were included. The review was undertaken following JBI methodological guidance for scoping reviews. The titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies, and then the full texts of the selected papers were assessed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 2617 records were identified, of which 174 articles were included. Most of them reported practices performed in the UK (63%), and less in Canada (19%) and Australia (6%). Advanced or extended practices were linked to all four pillars, but most concerned the clinical practice pillar. The main activities for this pillar were radiograph reporting (22%), patient assessment and management (consultation) in radiotherapy (RT; 21%), RT treatment planning (14%) and ultrasound practice (13%). Studies have also shown radiographers performing breast biopsies, medication prescription, and ultrasound and CT scan reports. The main fields of radiology concerned by the changing roles were radiotherapy (42%) and conventional radiography (36%).  CONCLUSION: Extended or advanced practices are achieved through a wide variety of activities around the world. This scoping review constitutes a knowledge base on the evolution of the practices of radiographers and should contribute to their recognition and development.

Real-World Implementation of Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy (SFRT-1000): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Palliative Courses Delivered in Routine Care

PURPOSE

The feasibility of simulation-free radiation therapy (SFRT) has been demonstrated but information regarding its routine care impact and scalability is lacking.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this single-institution, retrospective cohort study, all patients receiving palliative radiation therapy at an Australian tertiary cancer center were eligible for consideration of SFRT unless mask immobilization, a stereotactic technique, or a definitive dose was indicated. Coprimary endpoints were SFRT utilization, impact on consultation-to-RT time, and on-couch treatment duration. Timing metrics were compared with a contemporary local cohort that received simulation-based palliative radiation therapy using unadjusted Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and a propensity score-matched regression. Electronic patient-reported outcomes captured 2-week toxicity and pain response.  RESULTS:  Between April 2018 and February 2024, 2849 palliative radiation courses were delivered, of which 1904 were eligible. Of the 1904 courses, 1000 (52.5% SFRT utilization) received SFRT, including 668 using intensity-modulated radiation therapy/volumetric-modulated arc therapy. A total of 788 individual patients received SFRT and the median age was 71 years (IQR, 61-80) with 59% being male and 42% being Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 2-4. SFRT utilization increased from 41% to 54% between years 2018-2019 and 2022-2024.  SFRT reduced median consultation-to-RT time from 7.0 to 5.1 days (P < .0001) corresponding to an adjusted average treatment effect in the treated of -2.1 days (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.3). SFRT increased median on-couch treatment duration from 17.8 to 20.5 minutes (P < .0001; adjusted average treatment effect in the treated 2.6 minutes, 95% CI, 1.3-3.9). Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 acute toxicity was 9% and at 4 weeks after RT, patients with moderate/severe pain at baseline (≥5/10) had a mean pain reduction of 3.5 points (7.1-3.6; P < .0001).  CONCLUSIONS:  Using widely available technologies, the SFRT-1000 cohort demonstrates routine care scalability with patient-centered and workflow benefits. SFRT is an attractive new paradigm implementable in most settings following adaptation to local requirements. Thus, SFRT opens new avenues to potentially improve access to palliative RT, which remains a global area of need.

Diagnostic CT-Enabled Planning (DART): Results of a Randomized Trial in Palliative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Using diagnostic computed tomography (dCT) scans instead of CT simulation (CTsim) scans can increase departmental efficiency and reduce patient burden. The goal of the DART trial was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of dCT-based planning workflows with a focus on patient experiences, plan deliverability and adequacy of target coverage, and workflows.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients undergoing same-day CTsim and treatment for palliative radiation therapy to thoracic, abdominopelvic, or proximal limb targets with a recent dCT (within 28 days) in a reproducible position were eligible. After stratifying by target type (bone or soft tissue vs. visceral), participants were randomized (1:2 ratio) between CTsim-based (CTsim arm) vs. dCT-based planning (dCT arm). The primary endpoint was time in center (TIC), defined as total time spent in the cancer center on first day of treatment, from first radiation department appointment to first fraction completion. Secondary endpoints included plan deliverability, adequacy of target coverage, and stakeholder acceptability.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (42 treatment sites) were enrolled between June 2022 and April 2023. The median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR]: 67-78), 73% were male, and the most common primary cancers were lung (33%), prostate (24%), and breast (12%). The most common dose and fractionations were 8 Gy in 1 and 20 Gy in 5 fractions (50% and 43% of plans, respectively). TIC was 4.7 ± 1.1 hours (mean ± SD) in the CTsim arm vs. 0.41 ± 0.14 hours in the dCT arm (P < .001). All dCT plans were deliverable. All plans in both arms were rated as "acceptable" (80% CTsim; 81% dCT) or "acceptable with minor deviation" (20% CTsim; 19% dCT). Patient perception of acceptability was similar in both arms with the exception of time burden, which was rated as "acceptable" by 50% in the CTsim arm vs. 90% in the dCT arm (P = .025).

CONCLUSION

dCT-based radiation planning substantially reduced TIC without detriment in plan deliverability or quality and had a tangible impact on patient experience with reduced patient-reported time burden.

Established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy: A scoping review

Advanced practitioners are healthcare professionals that are highly skilled with a particular area of expertise. These roles have been successfully implemented in many healthcare settings, improving efficiency of the service, as well as enhancing the standard of care received by patients. Although advanced practice roles have been implemented in some radiation therapy departments, their implementation have yet to be facilitated in the majority of countries. The purpose of this review is to scope the literature available regarding established advanced practice roles in radiation therapy. The PRISMA strategy for the identification of relevant literature was adhered to. Two data bases, EMBASE and PubMed, were searched using combinations of the key words 'Advanced', 'Practice', 'APRT', 'Radiation', 'Therapy' and 'Radiotherapy'. Exclusion criteria were applied, and citation lists were also screened for additional relevant sources, including grey literature sources. A total of 35 relevant sources were identified that discussed advanced practice radiation therapy roles in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, Australia and the USA. Means of role establishment and scope of practice were defined, and a number of advantages and challenges for advanced practice radiation therapist roles were identified. There are many benefits of implementing advanced practice roles in radiation therapy departments. Though the implementation of these roles can be challenging, the existing evidence indicates that it would be beneficial for the patient, the radiation therapist and the department as a whole. A more systematic approach, including reporting of quantitative outcomes may assist in the more widespread implementation of these roles.

Overcoming uncertainty: A framework to guide the implementation of Australian radiation therapy advanced practitioners

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of radiation therapy advanced practice in Australia has not yet been broadly realised. With anticipated growing demands on cancer services, it is imperative to understand why this is the case, and to strategise a way forward. As a result, we explored the factors influencing the implementation of advanced practitioner radiation therapists (APRT) in Australia. The research outcome was a complex process of Navigating Uncertainty, which described the contextual, social and personal factors surrounding implementation successes and challenges. Further synthesis of the findings was undertaken to highlight the fundamental features influencing this process, with the intention to provide a useful understanding for practitioners seeking APRT implementation.

METHODS

Data were collected through national online focus groups and case studies with 53 participants. Analysis identified a constructivist grounded theory process of Navigating Uncertainty. Further analysis of the categories and properties of the process was undertaken to synthesise findings at a higher level of abstraction.

RESULTS

Four overarching and intertwined factors were influencing the implementation of APRT. Uncertainty occurred when practitioners attempted to conceptualise and assimilate the new role into the workplace. Power was apparent in the advocacy and legitimisation of the APRT by centre leaders. Value was vital to achieving purposeful outcomes. Identity was evident in the personal transition of the APRT, and in the boundary work with others.

CONCLUSION

Recognising and negotiating uncertainty, power, value and identity is essential for APRT implementation strategies to succeed. A framework to guide practitioners towards the implementation of APRT has been described that embodies these factors.

An Environmental Scan of Advanced Practice Radiation Therapy in the United States: A PESTEL Analysis

PURPOSE

In 2021, the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapy Working Group (APRTWG) was established in the United States as a grassroots alliance of multidisciplinary radiation oncology professionals-radiation therapists, physicians, dosimetrists, and administrators-located across the country, interested in studying and establishing the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist (APRT) level of practice in the United States. The APRT model has shown success in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Singapore, and other countries, documenting the value of the APRT to the quality and advancement of clinical care. In the United States, the APRTWG seeks to coordinate activities, align resources, and drive the national agenda to collectively develop and define novel models of care using APRT in line with the evolving needs of patients and the radiation therapy profession. This environmental scan aims to examine the context of radiation oncology medical practice in the United States to inform pathways ahead for a proposed APRT model through a Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal (PESTEL) analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was conducted to understand the chronological timeline of the development of APRT during the past 25 years. Items that included the activities, scope of practice, and implementation of APRT nationally and internationally were identified. Papers describing advanced practitioner roles that are commonly found in the multidisciplinary team in radiation oncology both in the United States and internationally, such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners, were excluded.

RESULTS

Despite the environmental scan outcome, it is acknowledged that data collation and analysis was not as robust as that anticipated by undertaking a systematic review. Papers were identified by the lead author that aligned with each of the PESTEL factors. Defined broadly, a new care model can adjust how health services are delivered by incorporating best practices in patient care for a specific population, person, or patient cohort. As patients enter different stages of their disease, the purpose of a new model is to provide individuals with the right care, at the right time, by the right team, in the right place. It is clear that the opportunity for positive change and impact on the current state of practice in radiation oncology exists.

CONCLUSION

The environmental scan findings demonstrate the complexities associated with implementing APRT in the United States, with multifactorial political, environmental, societal, technological, economic, and legal aspects to consider. The APRTWG will continue to lead and participate in such activities to demonstrate and identify APRT role opportunities in the United States and drive the nationwide implementation of the APRT level of practice in this country.

Palliative Care Delivery Systems and Integration With Palliative Care Teams

Radiotherapy (RT) plays a critical role in the palliation of symptoms in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. To address the growing need for these services, multiple dedicated palliative RT programs have been established. This article serves to highlight the novel ways in which palliative RT delivery systems support patients with advanced cancer. Through early integration of multidisciplinary palliative supportive services, rapid access programs facilitate best practices for oncologic patients at the end of life.

DART: diagnostic-CT-enabled planning: a randomized trial in palliative radiation therapy (study protocol)

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an effective treatment for managing symptoms of advanced cancer. At least half of all radiation treatments are delivered with palliative intent, aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. Symptomatic patients must receive PRT quickly, therefore expeditious treatment planning is essential. Standard radiation planning requires a dedicated CT scan acquired at the cancer centre, called a 'CT simulation', which facilitates treatment planning (i.e. tumor delineation, placement of radiation beams and dose calculation). However, the CT simulation process creates a bottleneck and often leads to delays in starting treatment. Other researchers have indicated that CT simulation can be replaced by the use of standard diagnostic CT scans for target delineation and planning, which are normally acquired through the radiology department as part of standard patient workup. The goals of this feasibility study are to assess the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of diagnostic-CT-enabled planning, compared to conventional CT simulation planning, for patients receiving PRT to bone, soft tissue and lung disease.

METHODS

This is a randomized, phase II study, with 33 PRT patients to be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between conventional CT simulation (Arm 1), and the diagnostic CT enabled planning workflow (Arm 2). Patients will be stratified by treatment target volume (bone and soft tissue metastasis vs. primary or metastatic intrathoracic disease targets). The primary endpoint is the amount of time the patient spends at the cancer centre. Secondary endpoints include efficacy (rate of plan deliverability and rate of plan acceptability on blinded dose distribution review), stakeholder acceptability (based on patient and clinician perception of acceptability questionnaires) and scalability.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of a "sim-free" PRT pathway compared to conventional CT simulation. The workflow may provide opportunity for resource optimization by using pre-existing diagnostic imaging and requires minimal investment due to its similarity to current PRT models. It also offers potential benefit to patients by eliminating an imaging procedure, reducing the amount of time spent at the cancer centre, and expediting time to treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05233904. Date of registration: February 10, 2022; current version: 1.4 on April 29, 2022.

[Ethical competence of the radiation therapist in the management of a crisis]

Many situations can be considered as a crisis in radiotherapy (failure of equipment, absenteeism, excessive workload, errors, urgent care, pandemic, etc.). Such events are defined as difficult situations in the course of daily activity, they can at any time escape the vigilance of the concerned actors when they are not prepared for it. The crisis can induce a disruption of balance between the normal course of the radiation therapy and the obligation for the manipulators to reconcile the consequences of the ongoing crisis with the objective of taking charge of all patients scheduled for the program. The crisis and its management will inexorably cause stress, fatigue and, as a consequence, impact patient safety. Management has an essential role to play in maintaining team dynamics when a crisis occurs, the work environment may no longer be the same. The aim of this article is to describe these situations in order to highlight the needs of the teams and more specifically the needs of the radiation therapist. It highlights the organization of patient care in the event of crisis management (Covid-19), during palliative radiotherapy with an opportunity to develop advanced practice. The reflection on the ethical concern of the radiation therapist in the prioritization of patients leads us to analyze the knowledge of medical ethics provided during initial training. When they perform their duties, manipulators seem to be confronted with situations that give rise to ethical dilemmas. It is then a question of understanding how they reflect on their practice in order to make it evolve. Is the radiation therapist confronted with ethical issues in the course of his practice? What solutions can be implemented to deal with these issues?

Evaluation of the palliative radiotherapy pathway in a single institute: Can an MR Linac improve efficiency?

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is effectively used to relieve cancer related symptoms. The demand for these services is increasing worldwide. Rapid response clinics have been developed as a means to streamline the palliative RT radiotherapy process and increase efficiency and improve patient experiences. Key components to successful rapid response palliative RT are access to care, streamlined services and innovation. To successfully implement a rapid response RT programme, it is essential to identify gaps between currently provided care and ideal or enhanced care. The aims of this work are to audit the current palliative RT workflow at our institution both prior to and during the coronavirus pandemic. This work reports the impact of covid-19 on rate of palliative RT referrals and proposes a radiographer led, MR guided rapid response workflow to reduce wait times METHODS: A retrospective audit of palliative radiotherapy booking forms was completed over a two yearperiod (2019-2020) to assess the current pathway both prior to and during the covid-19 pandemic. This audit identified patients who had received urgent/emergency spinal RT in the specified timeframe. Further data on these patients was collected using departmental oncology information systems to form a detailed analysis of the pathway and wait times. Data was recorded and analysed using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

A total of 813 patients met the inclusion criteria for this audit. Data was reported for 2019 and 2020 separately to determine any significant impact caused by the covid-19 pandemic. In 2020 there was an 11.5% increase in referrals for palliative radiotherapy with an equal portion (81%) of total referrals in each year being for single fractions. Timelines from referral to treatment delivery were reported, with those patients receiving same day single fraction RT palliative radiotherapy undergoing further analysis to determine the amount of time spent in the department. Mean wait time for these patients was 5 hours and 20 minutes in 2019 but increased by 20.9% in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing demand for palliative RT due to rising global cancer rates and extended life expectancy due to advanced systemic treatments may lead to increased wait times. An increase in both referrals and mean wait time was seen during the covid-19 pandemic. Improving efficiency and access to care is essential for this population. The MR Linac could play a role in streamlining palliative RT workflows due to its ability to employ a scan, plan and treat model in a single session. This work forms preliminary support for the development of a trial one stop palliative program on the MR Linac.

Advanced practice roles of therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Advances in Radiotherapy (RT) technology and increase of complexity in cancer care have enabled the implementation of new treatment techniques. Subsequently, a greater level of autonomy, responsibility, and accountability in the practice of Therapeutic Radiographers/Radiation Therapists (TR/RTTs) has led to Advanced Practice (AP) roles. The published evidence of this role is scattered with confusing terminology and divergence regarding the perception of whether a specific role represents AP internationally. This study aims to establish an international baseline of evidence on AP roles in RT to identify roles and activities performed by TR/RTTs at advanced level practice and to summarise the impact.

METHODS

A systematic PRISMA review of the literature was undertaken. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise the roles and associated activities. Six RT external experts validated the list. The impact was scrutinised in terms of clinical, organisational, and professional outcomes.

RESULTS

Studies (n = 87) were included and categorised into four groups. AP roles were listed by clinical area, site-specific, and scope of practice, and advanced activities were organised into seven dimensions and 27 sub-dimensions. Three most-reported outcomes were: enhanced service capacity, higher patient satisfaction, and safety maintenance.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based AP amongst TR/RTTs show how AP roles were conceptualised, implemented, and evaluated. Congruence studies have shown that TR/RTTs are at par with the gold-standard across the various AP roles.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first systematic literature review synthetisising AP roles and activities of TR/RTTs. This study also identified the main areas of AP that can be used to develop professional frameworks and education guiding policy by professional bodies, educators and other stakeholders.

Establishing a palliative Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist role: A viable alternative to a Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy clinic in Australia

INTRODUCTION

A recent survey found that Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy (RAPRT) clinics have not been widely embraced in Australia and New Zealand for many reasons. The purpose of this narrative is to describe the transition of a Brisbane, Queensland, RAPRT clinic to an Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist (APRT) model to further improve access and delivery of palliative radiation therapy at that centre.

METHODS

The weekly RAPRT clinic commenced in 2005, run by one Radiation Oncologist (RO). The role of the attending senior Radiation Therapist (RT) was mainly to facilitate rapid passage of patients from clinic to treatment. However, because individual ROs preferred to retain care of their own patients, capture of the relevant population was limited. It was therefore decided in 2012 to gradually transition to a model where the RT would work with all ROs and manage all palliative patients from referral to follow-up, under RO supervision.

RESULTS

The steps to this palliative APRT pathway involved formulation of the role description, mentoring/training of the RT, overseas site visits, further post-graduate education, funding of the position, staff feedback surveys, evaluation studies and endorsement by professional bodies, leading to formal credentialing in 2017. Importantly, the APRT undertakes all steps in the pathway including field or volume delineation (with approval and sign-off by the responsible RO). The role has come to be highly valued by all disciplines.

CONCLUSION

The successful establishment of a palliative APRT role in one Australian centre serves as a template for others wishing to create a similar position.

The palliative clinical specialist radiation therapist: A CAMRT White Paper

Palliative radiation therapy (pRT) is an effective tool for people with incurable cancer, in the treatment of many cancer-related symptoms such as pain, bleeding and dyspnea. As utilization rates for palliative radiation therapy increase, the demands on the healthcare system continue to grow. Radiation Therapists with advanced knowledge, skills and judgements began demonstrating their ability to practice autonomously in 2004, with the development of the Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapist (CSRT) role. Since this time, CSRTs with a specific focus in pRT (pCSRT) have been increasing in both numbers as well as their positive effects on the cancer care system. Integrating a pCSRT into the existing pRT system has resulted in increased access to and quality of pRT being delivered to palliative cancer patients. The benefits of the addition of pCSRTs to the cancer care system include increasing system capacity and increasing quality of care. This white paper provides information related to the improvements that can be realized in a RT program related to the care and treatment of its palliative patients by adding a pCSRT to the interprofessional healthcare team and suggest it as one of many strategies that can be undertaken to make improvements to access and quality of care.

Palliative radiotherapy indications during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future complex logistic settings: the NORMALITY model

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy.

This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named “La Rete del Sollievo” (“The Net of Relief”)]. The proposed model, denoted “No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy” (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19).

Material and Methods

First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed.

Results

After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., “Normality model of PRT indications”) for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits.

Conclusion

We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.

Preparing for advanced practice radiation therapy in South Africa: Conceptual and curricular considerations

The higher education landscape in South Africa has recently changed with the new National Qualifications Framework, leading to the introduction of four-year degrees in all four radiography disciplines. Additionally, there have been developments in the extension of roles in radiography, while the need for interdisciplinary practice has also been emphasised. The Professional Board for Radiography and Clinical Technology (PBRCT) of the Health Professions Council of South Africa is currently revising the scope of the profession which will now include extended roles. However, the extended role concept in radiation therapy has not received the attention similar to Diagnostic/Medical Imaging. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to provide concept clarification and key considerations for developing a postgraduate curricular framework for training radiation therapists to practise in the envisaged extended roles. For this narrative review, a Boolean search for advanced practice and role extension in radiation therapy was done on all databases (43) available on EbscoHost to source for peer-reviewed articles published between January 1950 and September 2020. A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria and were used to frame the discussion. Advanced practice emerged as the more suitable concept as it goes beyond an extension of tasks to include critical characteristics that are necessary to drive transformation in the local social, professional and educational arenas. It is envisaged that some of the key points discussed in this paper could assist the PBRCT in thinking about the implementation of the proposed extended roles for radiation therapists in South Africa.

Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy Clinics: The Evidence Is There, but Where Are the Clinics? An Australian and New Zealand Perspective

PURPOSE

First developed in Canada in the 1990s, Rapid Access Palliative Radiation Therapy (RAPRT) clinics have subsequently spread internationally to expedite treatment for near end-of-life patients, sparing them the need for multiple visits to the department. A "classical" RAPRT clinic is herein defined as "a dedicated clinic specifically established to enable (ideally) same day consultation, planning for, and delivery of palliative radiation treatment." The aim of this work was to determine the current status of these clinics in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A phone survey of all 100 Australian and 10 NZ radiation therapy centers was conducted in March and April 2021. The Chief Medical Officers of the 2 large private practices (GenesisCare and Icon) also approved the survey and answered on behalf of their 57 centers. A single page questionnaire was used, seeking information on the logistics and clinical details of past and present RAPRT clinics, and reasons why other centers do not have one.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 100%. There are only 3 current RAPRT clinics (2.7%). The dominant treatment indication is bone metastases (85%-90%), with most patients receiving single fractions (60%-90%), but commencement on the same day is variable (35%-90%). Five other clinics (4.5%) closed after 4 months to 7 years, but the clinical features were similar. By far, the most common reason (95%) given by the 107 centers without a current RAPRT clinic was that these patients are accommodated using existing resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Classical RAPRT clinics have not been widely embraced in ANZ. There are alternative strategies such as the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist model and techniques to avoid the conventional computed tomography-simulation step, which may also expedite treatment for palliative patients.

Navigating uncertainty: The implementation of Australian radiation therapy advanced practitioners

•

The implementation of advanced practice for radiation therapists in Australia is limited.

•

A constructivist grounded theory study identified the key processes influencing implementation.

•

‘Navigating uncertainty’ includes conceptual, practical, social and contextual features.

•

A national strategy is required to overcome uncertainty and inform systematic implementation.

Radiation therapy advanced practice has been implemented in several international jurisdictions; however, it is yet to be systematically integrated into Australian radiation oncology centres. This paper presents the outcomes of a doctoral research study to explore the factors that may be influencing the implementation of radiation therapy advanced practice in Australia. Using a constructivist grounded theory methodological approach to guide procedures, data collection occurred via 6 nationally facilitated online (video mediated) focus groups, and during interviews and observations at 5 purposively selected clinical case study locations. Data analysis led to the development of a grounded theory ‘navigating uncertainty’ to describe the process influencing the implementation of radiation therapy advanced practice in Australia. Navigating uncertainty is explained by three inter-related contextual processes of conceptualising radiation therapy advanced practice, integrating radiation therapy advanced practice, and becoming the radiation therapy advanced practitioner. The research suggests that the process of actively finding a way to accommodate uncertainty is necessary for advanced practice implementation objectives to be realised.

Diagnostic Computed Tomography Enabled Planning for Palliative Radiation Therapy: Removing the Need for a Planning Computed Tomography Scan

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using diagnostic computed tomography (dCT) for palliative radiation planning, removing the need for a planning computed tomography (pCT) scan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A sequential 2-stage study was performed. Stage 1 was a retrospective analysis of 150 patients' dCTs and pCTs to review potential barriers to radiation planning, as well as assess the field of view (FOV), patient positioning, couch curvature, and Hounsfield unit (HU) variation, and its dosimetric impact. Stage 2 was a clinical implementation of dCT planning into the clinical care path. Eligible patients were simulated per the standard department protocol in the dCT position. Treatment was planned on the dCT and replicated on the pCT as a backup and comparator. The dCT plan was delivered with cone beam computed tomography (CT) image guidance. After treatment, the delivered plan was recalculated on the modified dCT to compare planned with delivered planning target volume (PTV) dose.

RESULTS

Positron emission tomography-CT imaging was the most suited for diagnostic treatment planning. Metastases in the pelvis, abdomen, thoracic, and lumbar spines were the most reproducible. A curved, full-body vac-bag was designed to enable better replication of the posterior body curvature of dCT for treatment. There was minimal variation in mean HU from dCT to pCT scans. Dose difference due to HU variation in the thorax region due to the low-density tissue had the greatest variation. All patients in stage 2 (n = 30) were successfully treated using the dCT plan. Dosimetric evaluations were conducted comparing dCT and modified dCT plans, with the 95% dose coverage change in PTV between -2% to +2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

For palliative patients with bony and soft-tissue metastases, clinically acceptable plans can be produced using dCT. Diagnostic position can be replicated at treatment, eliminating the need for pCT with implications for streamlining and improving care for patients who require palliative radiation therapy.

Advancing Roles of Healthcare Professionals in Palliative Radiotherapy

New methods of working in relation to the management of patients requiring palliative radiotherapy are being embraced in hospital departments around the world. Team members are expanding on their previously assigned scope of practice to take on duties that had previously only been assigned to a consultant clinical oncologist. Career frameworks such as the four-tier model have been built upon to identify the skills held by other healthcare professionals and show how they may be best placed to take on additional roles within a patient pathway. Experiences of four departments in different countries report their local experiences in using both therapeutic radiographers and nursing staff to undertake advanced and consultant-level practice in relation to the management of both palliative radiotherapy patients and their research work streams. Involvement of other healthcare professionals within the clinical or research pathway for the management of palliative radiotherapy patients can be achieved. Their involvement can support clinicians and help to ensure the safe and efficient management of patients requiring palliative radiotherapy.

Does a radiographer-led palliative radiotherapy pathway provide an efficient service for patients with symptoms of advanced cancer? The Northampton experience

Aim:

To investigate whether a radiographer-led radiotherapy pathway can provide an efficient service for patients requiring treatment for symptomatic skeletal metastases.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective review of 425 courses of palliative radiotherapy was conducted. Data was analysed assessing diagnosis, dose/fractionation, time from referral to treatment, gender, age, inpatient/outpatient status and referring clinic location for radiographer- and clinical oncologist-led cohorts.

Results:

Patients aged ≥70 years were more likely to be planned by radiographers (n = 162/57, p < 0·001). Patients were more likely to be treated with 8 Gy in single fraction than with 20 Gy in five fractions (n = 279/136, p = 0·012). The median referral to treatment time in 8-Gy single-fraction prescriptions was 3 days for radiographer-led versus 7 days for clinical oncologist-led cohorts. In all patients and in 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions, it was 4 versus 8 days. A comparison of all prescriptions (p < 0·001), 8 Gy in single-fraction (p < 0·001) and 20 Gy in five-fraction prescriptions (p = 0·001) showed radiographer-led procedures as enabling faster access to treatment in each category.

Findings:

A radiographer-led service can facilitate faster access to treatment than a clinical oncologist-led pathway for an appropriately selected patient caseload.

An evaluation of an advanced practice role in palliative radiation therapy

Introduction

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the palliative advanced practice radiation therapy (APRT) role with respect to the impact on waiting times for patients from referral to radiation treatment delivery, the ability of the APRT to define palliative radiation therapy fields and patient satisfaction. The evaluation of the impact of the APRT role and referral pathway on patient waiting times has been previously published.

Methods

Patients were allocated to two different pathways; APRT and standard. Patients in the APRT pathway had their radiotherapy treatment managed by the APRT including defining their palliative fields blinded to the radiation oncologist (RO).

Results

Of the 150 palliative patients, 94 had their radiation therapy managed by the APRT and 56 were managed through the standard pathway. 82/92 APRT defined fields were accepted by the RO.

Conclusions

Inter‐observer variability between the APRT and the RO in defining palliative radiation therapy fields is similar to that reported in the literature between clinicians. With previously published reduced wait times from referral to treatment for palliative patients, the establishment of the APRT role is justified.