Radiographers' experiences in working with patients living with dementia in Norway - A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Imaging departments are seeing an increase in the number of patients living with dementia (PWD), driven by the ageing population and diagnostic benefits offered by medical imaging. This study explored radiographers' experiences during imaging examinations for PWD.

METHODS

A semi-structured interview guide comprising questions about radiographers' experiences, knowledge concerning PWD, challenges faced, and departmental initiatives was developed. Eight radiographers were interviewed, four working in MRI or general imaging, including CT and four in nuclear medicine, at three hospital trusts in Norway. Data analysis was conducted using inductive content analysis as described by Elo and Kyngäs, following a three-step process of preparation, organising and reporting. The qualified radiographers coded, categorised, and defined the themes and sub-themes to report on the findings.

RESULTS

Three main categories emerged: 1. Radiographers' experiences, which included overall challenges and the radiographers' attitudes. 2. Measures undertaken, outlining the actions radiographers take during procedures, and 3.Competencies, highlighting the knowledge possessed by radiographers. Organisational challenges, such as the absence of overarching protocols and insufficient training for radiographers related to PWD, posed difficulties in effectively conducting procedures. Creating a calm environment, collaborating with caregivers, scheduling adequate time for examinations, and possessing good communication skills were viewed as facilitators for conducting examinations successfully.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers perceived imaging of patients living with dementia to be generally uncomplicated. However, challenges in planning for and communicating with patients, particularly for advanced examinations or acute settings, were reported. Establishing dementia-friendly departments and training radiographers in specific communication techniques could be beneficial.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for more dementia-friendly imaging departments and communication training for radiographers working with PWD.

Opinions on advanced practice among diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers: Survey results of an European congress of radiology study

INTRODUCTION

The exploration of Advanced Practice (AP) in both diagnostic and therapeutic radiography has become a prominent topic of discussion within the radiographic community, prompting an investigation into radiographers' perceptions and the current global status of advanced roles. This study aimed collect data on radiography and radiation therapy AP career paths, and understand radiographers' perceptions of advanced practice at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2020.

METHODS

A concise, 15-question web-based survey was distributed through the EFRS Research Hub during ECR 2020. Topics covered included respondents' demographics, educational background, current radiography skills, the landscape of AP in radiography, potential progression avenues in their countries, and key benefits linked to role advancement.

RESULTS

The survey garnered responses from 83 radiographers, with a predominant 79.5% (n = 66) representing Europe. Information on the total number of participants approached during the ECR and thus the resulting response rate is not available. Among the findings, a meaningful portion (30%, n = 25) of participants indicated the absence of AP opportunities in their respective country. Notably, an overwhelming majority (97.5%, n = 81) expressed a personal willingness to embrace AP roles. Areas of particular interest to the respondents included radiography reporting (38.6%, n = 32), performing ultrasound examination (13.2%, n = 11), conducting interventional procedures (13.2%, n = 11) and engaging in radiography research (10.8%, n = 9).

CONCLUSION

The study indicates a keen interest among surveyed radiographers in pursuing AP, emphasizing the necessity for role recognition. Education, research and job satisfaction emerged as pivotal for AP progression. Despite this, AP availability in Europe is limited.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

There is a need to recognize and address barriers, provide targeted education and training, and promote job satisfaction to facilitate the development of AP in radiography.

Nordic radiographers' and students' perspectives on artificial intelligence - A cross-sectional online survey

INTRODUCTION

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the domain of radiography holds substantial potential in various aspects including workflow efficiency, image processing, patient positioning, and quality assurance. The successful implementation of AI within a Radiology department necessitates the participation of key stakeholders, particularly radiographers. The study aimed to provide a comprehensive investigation about Nordic radiographers' perspectives and attitudes towards AI in radiography.

METHODS

An online 29-item survey was distributed via social media platforms to Nordic students and radiographers working in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands including items on demographics, specialization, educational background, place of work and perspectives and knowledge on AI. The items were a mix of closed-type and scaled questions, with the option for free-text responses when relevant.

RESULTS

The survey received responses from all Nordic countries with 586 respondents, 26.8% males, 72.1% females, and 1.1% non-binary/self-defined or preferred not to say. The mean age was 37.2 with a standard deviation (SD) of ±12.1 years, and the mean number of years since qualification was 14.2 SD ± 10.3 years. A total of 43% (n = 254) of the respondents had not received any AI training in clinical practice. Whereas 13% (n = 76) had received AI during radiography undergrad training. A total of 77.9% (n = 412) expressed interest in pursuing AI education. The majority of respondents were aware of the potential use of AI (n = 485, 82.8%) and 39.1% (n = 204) had no reservations about AI.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this study found that Nordic radiographers have a positive attitude toward AI. Very limited training or education has been provided to the radiographers. Especially since 82.8% reports on plans to implement AI in clinical practice. In general, awareness of AI applications is high, but the educational level is low for Nordic radiographers.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

This study emphasises the favourable view of AI held by students and Nordic radiographers. However, there is a need for continuous professional development to facilitate the implementation and effective utilization of AI tools within the field of radiography.

Radiology image interpretation services in a low-resource setting: Medical doctors' experiences and the potential role of radiographers

INTRODUCTION

Medical doctors can encounter significant challenges in both the radiology image interpretation service and their ability to interpret images to promote effective patient management. This study aimed to explore the experiences of medical doctors in a low-resource setting regarding the image interpretation service received in state-funded hospitals and the potential role of radiographers.

METHODS

A qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenology design was employed. Thirteen medical officers and medical interns, with a maximum of three years of experience, were purposively selected from three state-funded hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in English, and data analysis followed the conventional content analysis method using Atlas.ti for Windows (version 9).

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged from the data. The first theme was a poor image interpretation service which highlighted issues such as long turnaround times for image reporting and compromised patient management. The second theme was training and support deficiency which revealed the inadequacy of image interpretation training and the need for additional on-the-job support. The third theme was the inconspicuous radiographer role which showcased the potential opportunities for radiographers to aid in filling the gaps in the image interpretation system.

CONCLUSION

Medical doctors in this low-resource setting experience significant delays in radiology image interpretation, leading to compromised patient management. Their training in image interpretation is inadequate, and they often lack on-the-job support. Radiographers potentially play a role in image interpretation which may provide solutions to these contextual challenges.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need to review and develop a comprehensive image interpretation system that effectively supports medical doctors in image interpretation, possibly involving the collaboration of radiographers.

Novel training approach to improve a cohort of radiographers' image interpretation skills of trauma chest radiographs

INTRODUCTION

Zambia is experiencing a critical shortage of radiologists responsible for interpreting X-ray images. Nine radiologists serve the entire population of over 18 million people. Consequently, referring physicians can receive reports late and often receive X-ray images without radiological reports attached, which may lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment of critically injured patients. This challenge could be alleviated if radiographers could assist with interpreting X-ray images. This study was undertaken to subject a cohort of Zambian radiographers to a training intervention, however, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated using a novel approach to the intervention by delivering the training mainly through social media but also through face-to-face lectures.

METHODS

A cohort of 27 radiographers employed at eight public hospitals in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia undertook a training intervention using face-to-face training and image discussions on the social media WhatsApp® platform. The participants underwent a pre-and post-test in which they were asked to interpret 20 adult trauma CXR images. For the training intervention, the radiographers attended a face-to-face image interpretation lecture, after which they received training images with a radiologist report weekly for eight weeks via the WhatsApp® platform. Participants were encouraged to discuss and pose questions via the platform.

RESULTS

The cohort of radiographers (n = 27) showed an improvement in their interpretation skills for trauma CXR images. The interpretation median scores ranged from approximately 82% to 93% in the pre-test and 85% to 97% in the post-test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed significant differences in the interpretation ability skills for 12 of the 20 CXR images after the 8-week training, demonstrating the successful implementation of the program. When comparing three categories of radiographers' years of experience (1-5; >5-10; and >10 years), the Kruskal Wallis test could not identify significant differences in the CXR image interpretation skills among the different categories of experience (P = 0.1616). When comparing the interpretation skills of radiographers working at the three different hospital levels (Level 3 with a full-time radiologist and more than ten radiographers; Level 1 and 2 without a full-time radiologist; Level 2 with six to ten radiographers; and Level 1 with five or less radiographers), the Kruskal Wallis test revealed that the level of the hospital where the radiographers were employed significantly influenced their skills to interpret the CXR images (P = 0.0323).

CONCLUSION

This type of novel training intervention is urgently required in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia. The results show that the training process was implemented successfully to improve radiographers' image interpretation skills of adult trauma CXR images.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Promoting radiographers' involvement in image interpretation will likely improve imaging services in Zambia, considering the critical shortage of radiologists.

Perceptions of radiographers regarding professional development in clinical practice in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

INTRODUCTION

Professional development is a concept inclusive of all learning such as postgraduate qualifications, staff development, and reflective practice, pursued for the betterment of radiographers' professional expertise. Professional development is associated with professional capabilities and quality service delivery to the patient, and this understanding of professional development applies to the radiography profession. The study aimed to explore and describe the perceptions of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) radiographers regarding the role of professional development in clinical practice.

METHODS

The study followed a qualitative exploratory-descriptive design, whereby the data was collected from 13 radiographers working in rural and urban KZN using one-on-one semi-structured interviews and analysed using Tesch's eight steps of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three principal themes emerged from the data analysis. The first theme was the radiographers' views of what constitutes professional development. The second theme highlighted radiographers' views of what promotes professional development among professionals and the final theme concerned the radiographers' views of what hinders professional development.

CONCLUSION

South African radiographers experience a range of challenges regarding professional development participation. There is a need to assist radiography managers to facilitate the professional development of their staff; to develop a culture of professional development among their staff; to recognise and reward radiographers for participating in professional development and to provide relevant and effective professional development opportunities for radiographers.

Research activity among diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers: An international survey

INTRODUCTION

Various national solutions have been considered and implemented to address the factors which limit radiographer engagement in conducting research. Nevertheless, national literature continues to suggest that radiographer engagement in research remains low. The aim of this study was to extend the existing evidence base by conducting an international survey to assess diagnostic radiographers and therapeutic radiographers involvement with, barriers to and support mechanisms for research.

METHODS

Data collection was obtained via an online questionnaire which was distributed by the International Society of Radiographers and Radiologic Technologists (ISRRT). The study population included an international sample of qualified diagnostic radiographers and therapeutic radiographers across clinical and academic contexts in a variety of different roles such as clinical practice, management, education and research.

RESULTS

In total, 420 diagnostic radiographers and therapeutic radiographers completed the survey. Multiple reasons were identified that were considered to inhibit respondents from conducting research. 69.3% indicated a combination of reasons for lack of engagement with research, rather than one single issue. Examples of reasons include: lack of time, insufficient research funding, limited research expertise, and lack of a suitable mentorship scheme.

CONCLUSION

A minor segment of survey respondents indicated involvement in research activity. Lack of dedicated time to research, mentors, and funding were among the main barriers to conduct research. Further research is required to explore what solutions are available to overcoming the barriers.

How to run successful tutor-training programs for radiographers: A systematic review and considerations for future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare professions differ from each other, therefore need different approaches in teaching clinical practices. While teaching and learning designs for medical students are widely present on databases, few information is available for radiographers. The aim of this research is to define tools and knowledge needed to develop successful tutor-training programs that can be cross-cutting and inter-disciplinary for radiography profession, taking inspiration from other healthcare professions' programs since the paucity of evidence for radiographers.

METHODS

A systematic review (PubMed/Embase) was performed according to the PRISMA checklist. Original articles on learning environment related to healthcare practitioners were included. Inclusion criteria comprehended articles covering design and frameworks of peer-assisted-learning (PAL) programs and training-the-trainer (TTT) curricula, skills required to become tutors, tips to install successful tutor-training programs along with benefits for tutors involved. From 1618 retrieved articles, after two selection rounds, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Out of the 15 articles, none is addressed to radiographers and only 7 % (1/15) to other healthcare professions, opposed to the 93 % (14/15) addressed to medical students. All articles discuss feedback providing, 66 % (10/15) debates which the best behaviour to maintain towards students is to maximize learning, and 46 % (7/15) inform about the importance of briefing and de-briefing activities. An identical percentage (46 %, 7/15) underlines the advantages of tutoring experiences. 11 articles (73 %) enhance that tutors aren't adequately trained to carry out tutoring activities.

DISCUSSION

Through curricula designed on TTT and PAL programs, radiographers are provided with necessary teachings and frameworks to set up effective training paths. Few institutes promote educational tutor-training courses, even though these are beneficial both for tutors and students, consolidating professionals' knowledge and maximizing students' practical skills.

CONCLUSION

Offering tutor-training curricula contributes to the development of radiographers as teachers, providing them with guiding principles to improve their formative skills towards future colleagues, therefore optimizing efficacy and effectiveness of programs.

Radiographers' perceptions of the experiences of patients with dementia attending the radiology department

BACKGROUND

Patients with dementia frequently present to the Radiology Department. However, stigmas have been recorded amongst radiographers surrounding imaging persons with dementia (PwD). This study aimed to investigate the impact of PwD attending the Radiology Department for imaging and the resultant effects to all patients, radiographers, and the Department from the perspectives of the examining radiographer.

METHODS

A paper-based questionnaire of radiographers' perceptions and experiences of individual examinations 'termed an interaction form' was created and made available in a public hospital in Ireland for a period of eight weeks. Radiographers completed the interaction form collecting data regarding individual imaging examinations of PwD. The form comprised sixteen closed and one open-ended question on the radiographers' individual perspectives of PwDs' abilities and distress levels, carers and comforters and their role in the examination, what the radiographer found helpful in the interaction, and any adverse events. Data were analysed using a combination of descriptive analysis and thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three interaction forms were completed by the participating radiographers. The modality most commonly represented in the survey was general X-ray (58%). Radiographers reported 84% of examinations for PwD required extra time, with 27% of examinations required repeat imaging and 69% of patients appeared distressed. A carer helped facilitate the completion of 77% of examinations. Qualitative data indicated that distractive and communicative techniques were used by radiographers to make the patient feel more comfortable and help with examination success.

CONCLUSION

PwD often require more time for radiological examinations, they often need repeat imaging and re-scheduling of an examination at a more appropriate time. These factors need to be considered when scheduling and performing radiological examinations. Patient distress was frequently encountered, this area may benefit from further research and dedicated practitioner training which could help drive improvements in patient experience.

Professional identity and role perception of Radiographers and Clinical Technologists in Nuclear Medicine - An exploratory qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

An awareness of Professional Identity (PI), an individual's identity in relation to their professional group, and Role Perception (RP), an individual's view of their specific role, may enable safe and effective practice by providing an understanding of professional boundaries, behaviours and activities. This research aimed to explore and gain an understanding of the PI and RP of Radiographers and Clinical Technologists working as Nuclear Medicine Technologists (NMT's).

METHODS

10 NMT's were recruited from a large National Health Service (NHS) Trust. Utilising the established methodology of Qualitative Description, data was obtained using semi-structured interviews and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: "Becoming the Unexpected" which detailed various training pathways; "Caring with Science" which described the NMT's role and defined their PI; "Same View, Different Lens" which portrayed how Radiographers and Clinical Technologists practise as team of NMT's; and "Confirmation of Professional Self" which presented how individuals view their professional status.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that the NMT role is highly specialised, multi-faceted and patient-centred. Their professional status is based on the nature of their role and their university level education and training. They work together under the umbrella title of NMT with a dual professional identity of "provider of care" and "user of science and technology". However, they may have an individual identity of Radiographer or Clinical Technologist that is determined by their training pathway.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This research has provided valuable understanding of the PI and RP of NMT's. By highlighting the differences in the regulatory status of this workforce, an insight into the future implications in the context of national healthcare planning has been provided, highlighting potentially significant issues that may impact on the manner in which NMT's can practice.

Australian radiographer roles in the emergency department; evidence of regulatory compliance to improve patient safety - A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

Using a narrative approach, this paper aims to determine the extent of Australian radiographers' regulatory compliance to improve patient safety when performing appendicular X-ray and non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) in the Emergency Department (ED).

KEY FINDINGS

A narrative review explored relevant literature and key regulatory policy. Ten documents were identified, three main themes were developed related to the radiographer roles in X-ray request justification, dose optimisation and preliminary image evaluation (PIE). Radiographers were equally aware of justification and optimisation pre and post the introduction of a Medical Code of Practice. The collective PIE accuracy of radiographers remained unaffected by changes in mode of PIE delivery and regulatory factors but varied based on the anatomical region.

CONCLUSION

While current Australian regulations mandate radiographer request justification, dose optimisation and PIE, the degree of compliance by Australian radiographers remains uncertain. Current literature provides evidence that radiographers can improve patient care and safety through justification, optimisation, and PIE delivery. Change in workplace practice, supported by key stakeholders including radiologists, is essential to integrate radiographers' functions into routine ED clinical practice. Further research is required to audit radiographers' regulatory compliance to improve patient safety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patient safety in ED can be improved with timely and accurate diagnosis provided by radiographers. Radiographers have a professional obligation to adhere to the capabilities and standards for safe medical radiation practice defined by Australian regulations. Therefore, radiographers must justify the X-ray request, optimise the radiation dose where appropriate and communicate urgent or unexpected findings to the referrer.

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry: Radiographer'S Role in Assessing Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Questionnaire Variables

BACKGROUND

The FRAX® algorithm is a tool used to calculate the 10-year probability of fracture in patients with osteoporosis and is based the assessment of several risk factors. We assessed the performance and accuracy of the completion of the FRAX® anamnestic questionnaire by the radiographer without impact on the clinical workflow.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluated the accuracy of fracture risk calculation by the radiographer using the FRAX® algorithm before and after specific training. A total of 100 women were enrolled in the study. The radiographer preliminarily administered the FRAX® questionnaire to all subjects before the execution of the DXA examination. After the end of the examination, a radiologist administered the questionnaire to the patient. Women were divided into two groups: group A (pre-training) and group B (post-training). The radiographer in group A completed the FRAX® questionnaire for the patients before training. For group B, the same radiographer completed the FRAX® questionnaire after training. The results of the FRAX® questionnaire completed by radiographer were compared with that completed by the referring physician.

RESULTS

Before training, radiographer's accuracy ranged from 92% (question 7, alcohol consumption) to 36% (question 6, secondary osteoporosis). After training, accuracy values improved substantially, ranging from 100% to 92%. Analysis of the absolute values of FRAX® showed that in the pre-training group data tended to be overestimated by the radiographer, with both major and fractures probabilities being significantly higher when assessed by the radiographer (12% and 5.8%, respectively). After the training, there was a marked decrease in the variation between the FRAX® data calculated by the radiographer and the radiologist.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of fracture risk calculation by the radiographer using the FRAX® algorithm is significantly improved after a specific training period. This study demonstrates the importance of dedicated training radiographers on the FRAX® algorithm.

Investigation of the diagnostic importance and accuracy of CT in the chest compared to the RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19 patients in Jordan

This article aims to synthesize the existing literature on the implementation of public policies to incentivize the development of treatments for rare diseases, (diseases with very low prevalence and therefore with low commercial interest) otherwise known as orphan drugs. The implementation of these incentives in the United States (US), Japan, and in the European Union (EU) seems to be related to a substantial increase in treatments for these diseases, and has influenced the way the pharmaceutical research & development (R&D) system operates beyond this policy area. Despite the success of the Orphan Drug model, the academic literature also highlights the negative implications that these public policies have on affordability and access to orphan drugs, as well as on the prioritization of certain disease rare areas over others. The synthesis focuses mostly on the United States' Orphan Drug Act (ODA) as a model for subsequent policies in other regions and countries. It starts with a historical overview of the creation of the term "rare diseases", continues with a summary of the evidence available on the US ODA's positive and negative impacts, and provides a summary of the different proposals to reform these incentives in light of the negative outcomes described. Finally, it describes some key aspects of the Japanese and European policies, as well as some of the challenges captured in the literature related to their impact in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).

On the edge of decision-making in trauma care: A focus group study on radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration

INTRODUCTION

The temporary trauma teams in trauma alerts consist of a diverse group of unique professionals requiring interprofessional collaboration and coordination to achieve efficient, high-quality care. The uncertain situation and complex care environment impose high demands on team dynamics such as individual attitudes and team behaviours. Within interprofessional teams, interaction and coordination reflect the collective success of collaboration and the achievement of goals. Interactions with radiographers have increased in trauma teams given computed tomography's prominent role in providing crucial knowledge for decision-making in trauma care. This study aimed to explore radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts.

METHOD

The study was designed with focus group methodology, including 17 radiographers participating in five focus groups, analysed with an inductive focus group analysis.

RESULTS

An overarching theme, "On the edge of decision-making", emerged along with three sub-themes: "Feeling included requires acknowledgement", "Exclusion precludes shared knowledge", and "Experience and mutual awareness facilitate team interaction".

CONCLUSIONS

Interprofessional collaboration from the radiographer's perspective within trauma teams requires a sense of inclusion and the ability to interact with the team. Exclusion from vital decision-making obstructs radiographers' comprehension of situations and thereby the interdependence in interprofessional collaboration.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Common platforms are needed for knowledge sharing and team practices, including radiographers' areas of responsibility and relational coordination to foster interprofessional relationships. Through these means interdependence through awareness and shared knowledge can be facilitated on trauma teams.

Radiographers' experiences and educational needs in relation to caring for suicidal patients during radiology examinations

INTRODUCTION

Researchers have explored the experiences, attitudes, and educational needs of several healthcare professional groups in relation to caring for suicidal patients. However, radiographers have not been included in these studies. Radiographers are likely to encounter these patients when they present for diagnostic imaging following suicide attempts.

METHODS

An online questionnaire exploring radiographers' experiences and educational needs in caring for suicidal patients was circulated to radiographers working in 23 acute hospitals across Ireland and posted to a Facebook page targeting Irish-based radiographers. Closed-ended questions were used to capture respondents' demographics and five-point Likert scale questions to establish their confidence levels in imaging suicidal patients. Open-ended questions were used to explore their experiences and educational needs. Quantitative data was analysed using descriptives statistics, and qualitative data thematically analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and four radiographers responded to the questionnaire, 96% of whom had imaged suicidal patients. Radiographers were confident in justifying and optimising these radiographic examinations, however, less confident in communicating with and caring for these patients. Radiographers reported insufficient patient history on imaging referrals and challenges in communicating with suicidal patients, which many attributed to lack of training. Radiographers expressed interest in further education related to caring for patients who've attempted suicide, which they felt should include an introduction to psychiatry, strategies for communicating with suicidal patients and building resilience.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers' experiences of imaging suicidal patients have been reported along with several challenges which could be addressed through further education.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Further education in caring for suicidal patients should be offered to radiographers which aligns with their educational needs. Referring clinicians should be reminded of the importance of informing radiographers of patients' suicide attempt when referring them for diagnostic imaging.

Evaluating the role of the diagnostic radiographer in identifying child safeguarding concerns: A knowledge, attitude and practice survey approach

INTRODUCTION

Child safeguarding and the appropriate identification of suspected victims represents a global phenomenon. Diagnostic imaging is acknowledged as a contributory diagnostic service but the role of the radiographer in the identification and escalation process is less well understood.

METHOD

A Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) survey was constructed to evaluate knowledge base in the context of the patient-radiographer interaction, the shaping of attitude towards child safeguarding and attitudes held towards their role plus the actual practical experiences of managing child safeguarding concerns.

RESULTS

Respondents demonstrated a inconsistent knowledge base with respect to physical, social and radiographic signs and symptoms of child safeguarding concern. A positive attitude towards the role of the radiographer in child safeguarding was demonstrated but one that was shaped more by experience than pre-registration education. Assessment of concerns was chiefly influenced by clinical history and appreciation of aetiology. Practically, radiographers have infrequent involvement with the identification and escalation of concerns. Whilst some statistically significant relationships between responses and demographics did exist, these were either sporadic or argued to be a result of natural variation.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of physical and social signs of child safeguarding concern are argued to be becoming more challenging. Radiological signs continue to be visible to radiographers but with increasing use of other imaging modalities these signs are becoming more varied in nature and are providing new challenges. Radiographers are capable of escalation when required to do so.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

To maximise the contribution of the profession, education needs to account for imaging modality worked with, in combination with an understanding of related aetiology. Previously existing concerns with respect to escalating processes are no longer in evidence and radiographers are both willing and able to contribute to that process.

New Zealand and Australian MRI technologists' (radiographers) MRI safety knowledge and confidence levels

INTRODUCTION

The MRI technologist (radiographer) is at the frontline of MRI safety decision-making and has the primary responsibility to provide high quality, efficient and safe patient care in the MRI environment. As MRI technology advances and new safety issues emerge, this study aimed to provide a snapshot of the preparedness of MRI technologists in New Zealand (NZ) and Australia to practise confidently and safely.

METHOD

An online questionnaire, administered via Qualtrics and covering a range of MRI safety topics, was distributed in 2018 via the New Zealand MR Users Group, the MRI Australia-NZ Group Facebook, and relevant professional bodies.

RESULTS

A total of 312 MRI technologists attempted the questionnaire, with 246 surveys being fully completed. Of these, 61% (n = 149) were in Australia, 36% (n = 89) in NZ, and 3% (n = 8) from other countries. Findings indicated that current MRI education is preparing MRI technologists in NZ and Australia to practise safely. However, while these technologists are confident in their MRI safety decision-making, accuracy levels within some groups need addressing.

CONCLUSION

To develop a consistent level of safe practice, it is proposed that a minimum level of MRI-specific education is defined and mandated to practise. Continuing professional development focussing on MRI safety must be encouraged and, if audited as part of registration, could also be mandated. Implementation of a supporting regulatory framework similar to NZ is recommended for other countries.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

All MRI technologists are responsible for the safety of their patients and staff. Employers must support and ensure MRI-specific education has been completed. Ongoing engagement in MRI safety events provided by MRI safety experts, professional bodies and/or universities is essential to remain up-to-date.

Patients' perspectives of the skills and competencies of therapy radiographers/radiation therapists (TRs/RTTs) in the UK, Portugal and Malta; a qualitative study from the SAFE Europe project

INTRODUCTION

The role of the Therapy Radiographer/Radiation Therapist (TR/RTT) is to provide radiotherapy to patients with a cancer diagnosis. This includes, not only administration of treatment, but also management of side-effects and provision of support/care. Despite this role being consistent throughout Europe, there is currently no standardisation of education for TRs/RTTs. The SAFE EUROPE project aims to standardize TR/RTT education to enable 'safe and free exchange' of TRs/RTTs across Europe. Consequently, this study aims to explore patients' perspectives regarding the current skills and competencies of TRs/RTTs.

METHODS

From May 2021 to February 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had recently received radiotherapy in the UK, Malta and Portugal. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the NHS Research Ethics Committee with additional local approvals obtained.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants from the UK (n = 18), Portugal (n = 19), and Malta (n = 11) completed interviews. Participants described high satisfaction with TRs'/RTTs' competence and skills in all three countries. The main theme arising from the analysis was the importance of trust building with TRs/RTTs. Six factors were identified as influencing levels of trust: communication; side-effect management; team consistency; relational skills; patient dignity; and competence. A small number of patients reported feeling rushed and not having their physical and emotional needs met by TRs/RTTs.

CONCLUSION

This multicentre study demonstrated that patients perceive TRs/RTTs in the UK, Malta and Portugal as highly competent and skilled. Practical recommendations are provided to address identified deficits in practice, which can be addressed through adaptation of TR/RTT education/training and clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Recommendations arising from this study are important to ensure that TRs/RTTs have transferable skills that provide consistently high quality care to patients throughout Europe.

The impact of artificial intelligence on radiography as a profession: A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, particularly deep learning, have made significant strides in image recognition and classification, providing remarkable diagnostic accuracy to various diseases. This domain of AI has been the focus of many research papers as it directly relates to the roles and responsibilities of a radiologist. However, discussions on the impact of such technology on the radiography profession are often overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, this paper aims to address the application of AI in radiography and how AI's rapid emergence into healthcare is impacting not only standard radiographic protocols but the role of the radiographic technologist as well.

METHODS

A review of the literature on AI and radiography was performed, using databases within PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Video presentations from YouTube were also utilized to weigh the varying opinions of world leaders at the fore of artificial intelligence.

RESULTS

AI can augment routine standard radiographic protocols. It can automatically ensure optimal patient positioning within the gantry as well as automate image processing. As AI technologies continue to emerge in diagnostic imaging, practicing radiologic technologists are urged to achieve threshold computational and technical literacy to operate AI-driven imaging technology.

CONCLUSION

There are many applications of AI in radiography including acquisition and image processing. In the near future, it will be important to supply the demand for radiographers skilled in AI-driven technologies.

Concordance between a gastrointestinal consultant radiologist, a consultant radiologist and qualified reporting radiographers interpreting abdominal radiographs

INTRODUCTION

Radiographers can accurately report musculoskeletal and chest radiographs, but there is paucity of research comparing the performance of reporting radiographers (RRs) with consultant radiologists when interpreting and reporting abdominal radiographs. This study assessed interobserver agreement in the clinical setting between reporting radiographers and a consultant radiologist compared to an expert gastrointestinal radiologist in a District General Hospital. Major discordant reports affecting patient management were also examined.

METHODS

126 abdominal radiographs reported by 3 RRs in clinical practice were randomly selected and reported by a consultant radiologist and index gastrointestinal radiologist. The reports of the RRs and consultant radiologist were compared against the reports made by the index radiologist for agreement by a colorectal consultant surgeon. All 126 reports were scored as being in either complete agreement, minor disagreement or major disagreement which would have resulted in a change to patient management.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in overall agreement between the consultant radiologist (CR) and RRs when compared to the index radiologist (CR: n = 90/126, 71.4% and RRs: n = 94/126, 74.6%. p = 0.57). Major disagreements were found, but there was no significant difference between both groups (CR: n = 23/126, 18.3% and RRs: n = 17/126, 13.5%. p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

RRs can report abdominal radiographs to a comparable level of agreement as a consultant radiologist in the clinical setting. There was no significant difference in reports deemed to affect patient management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study addresses the gap in assessing the performance of RRs reporting abdominal radiographs. This small scale study indicates that radiographers could provide additional support in the reporting of abdominal radiographs. This would help to reduce radiologist workload and enhance the role of the reporting radiographer.

CLASSIFICATION

Agreement between reporting radiographers and radiologists interpreting and reporting abdominal radiographs.

Burnout and occupational stress among Hungarian radiographers working in emergency and non-emergency departments during COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

The increased workload caused by the coronavirus pandemic may have had a significant impact on the mental health of radiographers. The aim of our study was to investigate burnout and occupational stress in radiographers working in emergency departments (ED) and non-emergency departments (NED).

METHODS

Quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive research was carried out among radiographers working in the public health sector in Hungary. Due to the cross-sectional nature of our survey, there was no overlap between the ED and NED groups. For data collection, we used simultaneously the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Effort-Reward Imbalance questionnaire (ERI), and our self-designed questionnaire.

RESULTS

We excluded incomplete questionnaires from our survey; finally, 439 responses were evaluated. Significantly higher scores for depersonalisation (DP; 8.43 (SD = 6.69) vs. 5.63 (SD = 4.21) and emotional exhaustion (EE; 25.07 (SD = 11.41) vs. 19.72 (SD = 11.72)) were observed in radiographers working in ED (p = 0.001; p = 0.001) when compared to NED. Male radiographers working in ED aged 20-29 and 30-39 years with experience of 1-9 years were more affected by DP (p ≤ 0.05). Worrying about one's own health had a negative effect on DP and EE (p ≤ 0.05). Having close friend with a COVID-19 infection had a negative effect on EE (p ≤ 0.05); not being infected with coronavirus, not being quarantined and relocating within the workplace had a positive effect on personal accomplishment (PA); radiographers who were 50 years or older with 20-29 years of experience were more affected by depersonalisation (DP); and those who worried about their health had significantly higher stress scores (p ≤ 0.05) in both ED and NED settings.

CONCLUSION

Male radiographers at the beginning of their careers were more affected by burnout. Employment in EDs had a negative impact on DP and EE.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our results support the implementation of interventions to counter the effects of occupational stress and burnout among radiographers working in ED.

Burnout among oncologists, nurses, and radiographers working in oncology patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Oncology care professionals are exposed to high levels of stress that can lead to burnout. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of burnout among nurses, oncologists and radiographers working in oncology patient care during the COVID -19 pandemic.

METHODS

Our electronic questionnaire was sent to e-mail contacts registered in the system of the Hungarian Society of Oncologists and to all oncology staff via an internal information system in each cancer center. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, which measures depersonalization (DP), emotional exhaustion (EE), and personal accomplishment (PA). Demographic and work-related characteristics were collected in our self-designed questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, two-sample t-tests, analyzes of variance, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 205 oncology care workers' responses were analyzed. Oncologists (n = 75) were found to be significantly more committed to DP and EE (p = 0.001; p = 0.001). Working more than 50 h per week and being on-call had a negative effect on the EE dimension (p = 0.001; p = 0.003). Coming up with the idea of working abroad had a negative effect on all three dimensions of burnout (p ≤ 0.05). Respondents who did not leave their job due to their current life situation had significantly higher DE, EE, and lower PA (p ≤ 0.05). Intention to leave current profession was specific in (n = 24/78; 30.8%) of nurses (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that male gender, being an oncologist, working more than 50 h per week and taking on call duties have a negative impact on individual burnout. Future measures to prevent burnout should be integrated into the professionals' work environment, regardless of the impact of the current pandemic.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Prevention and oncopsychological training should be developed gradually at the organisational or personal level to avoid early burnout of professionals.

An exploration of engagement, expectations and attitudes at a single centre

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of evidence-based practice (EBP) and research in healthcare are widely accepted for the patient, professional and organisation. However, allied health professional and radiographer activity remains lacking; this study aimed to explore this at a local level.

METHODS

This single centre study utilised mixed methods research methodology to triangulate findings from three parallel data collections. Document analysis of radiographer job descriptions (JDs) and appraisal frameworks, retrospective review of completed research activities, and a survey of radiographer perspectives were undertaken. Data analysis included content analysis, thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In three years (2018-2020), 290 EBP activities were completed; 287 were audit and three were service evaluations. There were no documented research projects and no entry level radiographer involvement. The survey response rate was 65.3% (n = 77/118). All JDs describe research engagement, but 50.6% of survey respondents did not realise this. There were inconsistencies and lack of clear progression in these expectations and no direct reference to research in the standard appraisal documentation. Radiographers demonstrated a positive attitude towards research and EBP but felt there were barriers preventing activity. Generally, they did not perceive a strong research culture in their department.

CONCLUSION

As part of EBP, research is a requirement for diagnostic radiographers of all levels. There is widespread enthusiasm and a positive attitude from radiographers to engage, yet activity remains low.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A strong evidence-based culture needs to be prioritised, to embrace the current enthusiasm from radiographers to engage, and accordingly bridge the gap between aspirations of their professional body and actual clinical practice.

An analysis of the role performance and characteristics of an ideal clinical tutor: Perspectives from undergraduate diagnostic radiography students in KwaZulu-Natal

INTRODUCTION

Work Integrated Learning (WIL) is an essential core component for undergraduate students pursuing the Radiography profession. Clinical tutors in WIL placements assist students in acquiring the skills and knowledge required to register and practice as a Diagnostic Radiographer. Importantly, the characteristics of clinical tutors have been reported to impact students' experience in the clinical work environment.

METHODS

An explorative-descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Using the non-probability purposive sampling method, 15 Diagnostic Radiography students studying at a Higher Education Institution in South Africa participated in the study. Semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were used as the data collection tool and data was analyzed by the application of Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS

The findings are suggestive that students prefer a clinical tutor who is knowledgeable within the field in order to facilitate learning within the clinical sector of Radiography, as well as to better integrate theory into practice. Furthermore, students prefer a clinical tutor who is empathetic, understands and respects students. The Table of Themes emerged from the conceptual framework under Carl Rogers' Theory of Facilitation (Rogers, 1979) which gives rise to three conditions of learning that must be provided by a clinical tutor.

CONCLUSION

The emerging characteristics from the study strongly correlate with other studies performed internationally. The relevance of students' relationships with their clinical tutors was regarded as a crucial factor influencing students' work integrated learning placement experience. According to the findings, one of the most important drivers of a successful work integrated learning experience is the clinical tutor's attitude towards the student.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Improvement of the practice of clinical tutors within WIL placements and enhanced awareness of clinical tutors on how they impact students during clinical practice.

[Radiation TherapisTs Radiographer (RTTs) and risk management in radiotherapy: An international survey]

PURPOSE

In order to study the role perception and the effective involvement of Radiation TherapisTs (RTTs) in risk management in radiotherapy, a survey was developed and distributed in five countries (France, Switzerland, Belgium, Ireland, the Netherlands).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The article presents the results of this survey and the comparison between the different countries.

RESULTS

Overall, the results of the survey show a good involvement and perception of the RTTs around the risk management approach, although training in this area has yet to be systematized.

CONCLUSION

Although with differences in the results between the participating countries, the survey seems to highlight the deployment of preventive actions that are evaluated as not very effective by the respondents and by the international scientific literature.

Accuracy of radiographer preliminary clinical evaluation of skeletal trauma radiographs, in clinical practice at a district general hospital

INTRODUCTION

Error in interpretation of trauma radiographs by referrers is a problem which has detrimental effects on the patient and causes unnecessary repeat attendances. Radiographers can reduce errors by offering their opinion at the time of imaging. The Society and College of Radiographers have a longstanding recommendation that Red Dot (RD) schemes should be replaced by Preliminary Clinical Evaluation (PCE). The purpose of the study was to evaluate radiographer interpretation of skeletal trauma radiographs in clinical practice, determine if there was any difference in ability to interpret appendicular and axial studies, and evaluate appropriateness of PCE implementation.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 23 self-selecting radiographers provided RD and PCE on 762 examinations. Each case was compared against the verified report and assigned a true negative/positive or false negative/positive value. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and performance measures between RD versus PCE, and appendicular versus axial were compared using Two-sample Z-Tests. Error analysis was performed and inter-observer consistency determined.

RESULTS

Overall RD and PCE accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the study were 90%, 72% and 97% (RD), and 92%, 80% and 97% (PCE) respectively. Significant difference was demonstrated for sensitivity with PCE more sensitive than RD (p-value 0.03) and appendicular more sensitive than axial (RD p-value <0.02, PCE p-value <0.0001). Most errors were false negatives. Inter-observer consistency was evaluated by review of 128 cases and no difference between reviewers was established.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers without specific training were able to provide RD and PCE to a high standard. Radiographers interpreted positive findings more accurately using PCE than RD, and positive findings on appendicular cases were interpreted more accurately than those on axial cases.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study supports local PCE implementation, contributes to the wider evidence base to justify transition towards PCE and identifies the necessity for local axial image interpretation training.

Agreement in the reporting of General Practitioner requested musculoskeletal radiographs: Reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the inter-observer agreement of reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist when reporting General Practitioner (GP) requested musculoskeletal radiographs. The potential effect of discordant reports on patient management and outcome was also examined.

METHODS

Three reporting radiographers, three consultant radiologists and an index radiologist reported on a retrospective randomised sample of 219 GP requested musculoskeletal radiographs, in conditions simulating clinical practice. A speciality doctor in radiology compared the observers' reports with the index radiologist report for agreement and assessed whether any discordance between reports was clinically important.

RESULTS

Overall agreement with the index radiologist was 47.0% (95% CI, 40.5-53.6) and 51.6% (95% CI, 45.0-58.1) for the consultant radiologists and reporting radiographers, respectively. The results for the appendicular and axial skeleton were 48.6% (95% CI, 41.3-55.9) and 40.9% (95% CI, 27.7-55.6) for the radiologists, and 52.6% (95% CI, 45.2-59.8) and 47.7% (95% CI, 33.8-62.1) for the radiographers, respectively. The difference in overall observer agreement between the two professional groups with the index radiologist was not statistically significant (p = 0.34). Discordance with the index radiologist's reports was judged to be clinically important in less than 10% of the observer's reports.

CONCLUSION

Reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists demonstrate similar levels of concordance with an index radiologist when reporting GP requested musculoskeletal radiographs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

These findings contribute to the wider evidence base that selected radiographers with appropriate postgraduate education and training are proficient to report on musculoskeletal radiographs, irrespective of referral source.

"In the Eye of the Storm"-Radiographers' Experience of Working With SARS Covid-19 Patients

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the spread of Covid-19 a pandemic. An overloaded sampling system was not sufficient, while radiography examinations proved to be reliable in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Radiographers are front line workers whose work has contributed to the fight against Covid-19. The aim of the study is to interview and describe radiographers' experiences in caring for SARS-CoV-2 patients. This is a qualitative interview study with ten radiographers, in which both men and women participated, with various backgrounds in radiography positions. The interview study was conducted with the help of open-ended questions and a predetermined interview guide with carefully evaluated questions that allow the interviewee to speak freely about the research topic. The text obtained from the interviews was analyzed according to the model for content analysis. The results of the analyzed material from the interviews resulted in four main categories: surprise, fear, new guidelines, and the front line. The interviewees have raised the coronavirus pandemic as a challenge that has involved new ways of thinking and working. Radiographers are among the thousands of health-care workers who are at the forefront against the coronavirus pandemic. The work of radiographers is imperative in the diagnosis of patients with symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2. Radiography examinations are fundamental in the continuing care chain for Covid-19 patients.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy concerns: Findings from a Ghana clinical radiography workforce survey

Introduction

Vaccination is a key global strategy to mitigate the clinical impact of the COVID-19 virus. As part of local efforts to manage the outbreak, the government of Ghana announced its intention to vaccinate its population starting with essential and high-risk workers including radiographers. However, there were reports of hesitance to receiving the vaccine among the radiography workforce. This study was undertaken prior to the intended vaccination exercise to assess the willingness and concerns of radiographers to undergo the COVID-19 vaccination and to suggest recommendations to improve the vaccine uptake.

Methods

An ethically-approved online survey strategy was employed for this cross-sectional study conducted between 24th–28th February 2021. The survey employed quantitative questions and open text response options. Quantitative and open text responses were analysed using statistical and thematic analyses, respectively.

Results

There were 108 responses (response rate of 46.3%). The majority (n = 64, 59.3%) were willing to have the vaccine, however, some (n = 44, 40.7%) were not. The main reason behind their willingness to have the vaccine was its ability to reduce the spread of infections and lower mortality (n = 35, 54.7%). However, doubts about the vaccine's efficacy and side effects (n = 26, 56.8%), conspiracy theory concerns about its effects on the Ghanaian race (n = 4, 9.1%), and fertility concerns (n = 2, 4.5%) were some reasons for their hesitance to receive the vaccine. The open text commentary further revealed that the vaccine was thought of as a lifesaving medication, however, clinical safety concerns, lack of education/information and religious beliefs were affecting peoples' willingness to be vaccinated.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate the need for an urgent public health educational intervention to address the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy concerns raised by radiographers to help increase the vaccine uptake.

Implication for practice

The study provides pertinent information to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake among radiographers to limit the spread of infections.

Facilitators for and barriers to radiography research in public healthcare in Nordic countries

INTRODUCTION

It has been suggested that the future of diagnostic imaging relies on engagement in research and evidence-based practice. This implies a role transition from a clinical radiographer to a clinical radiographer-researcher. Clinical radiographers' stimuli for engaging in research in Nordic countries are unknown. This study aimed to address this gap.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data collection via an online questionnaire on facilitators for and barriers to participation in radiography research was carried out among 507 clinical radiographers in public healthcare in the Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

RESULTS

Support from colleagues (odds ratio [OR] 2.62) and other professionals (OR 2.74), and self-esteem in research skills (OR ≥ 2.21), were facilitators for radiography research. Lack of knowledge and skills to conduct research (OR 2.48) was revealed to hinder radiographers' participation in research. The absence of a radiography research culture in the workplace explained non-participation in research (OR 1.75).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed significant factors for clinical radiographers' participation in research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A strategy for establishing a radiography research culture in healthcare is proposed that is novel for the context. Management support for knowledge development and activity leading to inter-professional research projects across knowledge fields, provision of a radiography research lead and acknowledgement of radiography research among colleagues signify the establishment of the culture. These prerequisites might provide a paradigm change towards not only the symbiosis of a clinical radiographer and an autonomous researcher but also a partner who adds radiography research to evidence-based practice in diagnostic imaging.

Artificial Intelligence: Guidance for clinical imaging and therapeutic radiography professionals, a summary by the Society of Radiographers AI working group

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) has started to be increasingly adopted in medical imaging and radiotherapy clinical practice, however research, education and partnerships have not really caught up yet to facilitate a safe and effective transition. The aim of the document is to provide baseline guidance for radiographers working in the field of AI in education, research, clinical practice and stakeholder partnerships. The guideline is intended for use by the multi-professional clinical imaging and radiotherapy teams, including all staff, volunteers, students and learners.

METHODS

The format mirrored similar publications from other SCoR working groups in the past. The recommendations have been subject to a rapid period of peer, professional and patient assessment and review. Feedback was sought from a range of SoR members and advisory groups, as well as from the SoR director of professional policy, as well as from external experts. Amendments were then made in line with feedback received and a final consensus was reached.

RESULTS

AI is an innovative tool radiographers will need to engage with to ensure a safe and efficient clinical service in imaging and radiotherapy. Educational provisions will need to be proportionately adjusted by Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to offer the necessary knowledge, skills and competences for diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers, to enable them to navigate a future where AI will be central to patient diagnosis and treatment pathways. Radiography-led research in AI should address key clinical challenges and enable radiographers co-design, implement and validate AI solutions. Partnerships are key in ensuring the contribution of radiographers is integrated into healthcare AI ecosystems for the benefit of the patients and service users.

CONCLUSION

Radiography is starting to work towards a future with AI-enabled healthcare. This guidance offers some recommendations for different areas of radiography practice. There is a need to update our educational curricula, rethink our research priorities, forge new strong clinical-academic-industry partnerships to optimise clinical practice. Specific recommendations in relation to clinical practice, education, research and the forging of partnerships with key stakeholders are discussed, with potential impact on policy and practice in all these domains. These recommendations aim to serve as baseline guidance for UK radiographers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This review offers the most up-to-date recommendations for clinical practitioners, researchers, academics and service users of clinical imaging and therapeutic radiography services. Radiography practice, education and research must gradually adjust to AI-enabled healthcare systems to ensure gains of AI technologies are maximised and challenges and risks are minimised. This guidance will need to be updated regularly given the fast-changing pace of AI development and innovation.

Professionals' responses to the introduction of AI innovations in radiology and their implications for future adoption: a qualitative study

Background

Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovations in radiology offer a potential solution to the increasing demand for imaging tests and the ongoing workforce crisis. Crucial to their adoption is the involvement of different professional groups, namely radiologists and radiographers, who work interdependently but whose perceptions and responses towards AI may differ. We aim to explore the knowledge, awareness and attitudes towards AI amongst professional groups in radiology, and to analyse the implications for the future adoption of these technologies into practice.

Methods

We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with 12 radiologists and 6 radiographers from four breast units in National Health Services (NHS) organisations and one focus group with 8 radiographers from a fifth NHS breast unit, between 2018 and 2020.

Results

We found that radiographers and radiologists vary with respect to their awareness and knowledge around AI. Through their professional networks, conference attendance, and contacts with industry developers, radiologists receive more information and acquire more knowledge of the potential applications of AI. Radiographers instead rely more on localized personal networks for information. Our results also show that although both groups believe AI innovations offer a potential solution to workforce shortages, they differ significantly regarding the impact they believe it will have on their professional roles. Radiologists believe AI has the potential to take on more repetitive tasks and allow them to focus on more interesting and challenging work. They are less concerned that AI technology might constrain their professional role and autonomy. Radiographers showed greater concern about the potential impact that AI technology could have on their roles and skills development. They were less confident of their ability to respond positively to the potential risks and opportunities posed by AI technology.

Conclusions

In summary, our findings suggest that professional responses to AI are linked to existing work roles, but are also mediated by differences in knowledge and attitudes attributable to inter-professional differences in status and identity. These findings question broad-brush assertions about the future deskilling impact of AI which neglect the need for AI innovations in healthcare to be integrated into existing work processes subject to high levels of professional autonomy.

Large differences in education and training of radiographers in Europe and Central Asia: Results from an IAEA coordinated study

INTRODUCTION

Education and training of radiographers is known to be diverse between countries and regions. Under an IAEA project, this work collected data on radiographer education for the Europe and Central Asia region with a particular focus on radiation protection gaps and potential actions.

METHODS

Following piloting, an electronic questionnaire was distributed to all national counterparts for the IAEA Technial Coopearation (TC) Europe region (n = 33 countries) and nominated national representatives. Contacts were additionally invited to a virtual workshop to discuss and rank common problems in education and training of radiographers and to propose potential solutions.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 31 countries, including 14 from the European Union. Just over half of countries reported radiographer education being in higher education with 71% having program durations more than 3 years (range: 1 month-4 years). Programs included a spectrum of both clinical training and radiation protection hours with ten-fold variations noted across the region. Inclusion of core radiation protection topics within curricula varied similarly, as did radiographers' clinical involvement in both justification and optimisation between countries. Workshop participants identified five common training problems, namely education availability, lack of standardisation, radiation protection course quality, teamwork problems and lack of equipment.

CONCLUSION

Radiographer education in the IAEA Europe region is heterogeneous with substantial differences in duration and quality of training programs between countries, which likely impact on quality of patient care delivered. Common problems have been identified and potential solutions proposed to focus quality improvement initiatives.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiographer education and training is diverse throughout the IAEA TC Europe region, with likely impacts on radiation protection practices applied. Clinical involvement of radiographers in justification and optimisation differs, potentially limiting adherence to radiation protection principles.

Workplace factors facilitating the radiographers' assessment of referrals for diagnostic imaging - A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Radiology referrals are assessed for appropriate imaging based on the available clinical information. The task is legally the responsibility of the radiologists but could be delegated to radiographers under guidance. Knowledge of how this task is organised in radiology departments is limited. The study aim was to identify workplace factors facilitating the radiographers' assessment of referrals for medical imaging.

METHODS

Five radiographers were recruited by convenience- and snowball-sampling techniques through the online social media platform LinkedIn. The participants represented different private and public hospitals and had from three to above ten years of experience with assessment of referrals for plain and cross sectional imaging. Following a qualitative approach, 60-min in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted through online video meetings. Interviews followed a topic guide with 15 questions and 20 keywords, previously tested through a pilot interview. Systematic text condensation was performed using NVivo 12, where central themes and underlying subthemes were developed.

RESULTS

Five central facilitating factors were identified, each with subthemes identified as: (1) Formal responsibilities; Documented delegation, Specific role description, (2) Training; Achieving skills, Maintaining skills, (3) Guidelines; Clinical indications, Priority, (4) Resource allocation; Time, Staff, (5) a Supporting environment; Teamwork, Mutual benefits, Feedback and knowledge sharing.

CONCLUSION

The study adds new and valuable insights into workplace factors facilitating the radiographers' delegated task of assessing referrals. Workflows adapting such factors benefit radiographers by increasing knowledge and professional development, while positively re-allocating radiologist resources.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The study findings may support radiology workplaces in establishing or improving referral assessment by radiographers. Subsequently, improved quality of patient services may be achieved.

Coming out or staying in? Disclosure experiences of lesbian and gay radiation therapists in practice

INTRODUCTION

The healthcare environment reflects and embeds sociocultural norms, including heteronormativity. Coming out for sexual and gender minority (SGM) people is often a process of continual identity management. There is evidence that lesbian and gay people (LG), both patients and healthcare professionals, engage in significant emotional work to manage who they tell about their sexual identity, and when. This qualitative study explored the experiences of LG radiation therapists (RTs) managing their sexual identity at work, and how this impacts relationships with co-workers and patients.

METHODS

The research used an authoethnographic narrative inquiry approach. Narrative inquiry incorporates story-based methods to acquire a deep understanding of how individuals make sense of events. Autoethnography uses personal experience to understand and reflect on a broader culture. Three LG participants from a Canadian urban cancer centre worked with the researcher to co-construct stories of coming out at work using their shared personal histories.

RESULTS

The co-constructed stories included fictionalised narratives of coming out at work, relationships with patients/peers, the experiences of sexual minority patients and the researcher's accompanying embodied research journey. They were written in a variety of genres and from a number of different perspectives. The results showed the participants engaged in highly contextualised and continual identity management which depended on a series of different strategies or tools. Additionally, it was clear that both the discourse around professionalism, and the pervasive biomedical healthcare culture served to further inhibit disclosure at work. Purposeful disclosure to LG patients was uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Coming out at work might be a risky business for some lesbian and gay RTs. However, focused attention on improving the work environment so RTs can be open about their identities in the professional setting would be beneficial for patients and staff.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

LG RTs who are out at work can be a source of support and comfort to SGM patients. They may also feel more satisfied and engaged at work. Organizations should ensure they provide overt support for SGM RTs from frontline staff to leadership roles.

A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS)

INTRODUCTION

Variability in non-medical ultrasound practice across Europe has been highlighted in studies. Meanwhile, advanced practice in radiography has undergone rapid development in the United Kingdom (UK). This survey aimed to review results relating to extended role and advanced practice skills, motivation and job satisfaction from a wider survey of radiographers undertaking ultrasound examinations across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies' (EFRS) community.

METHODS

Following a pilot study, a SurveyMonkey™ on-line questionnaire was disseminated to EFRS member societies to share with their members, and via social media platforms. Quantitative questions for this article related to extended and advanced practice skills, communication of results, job satisfaction, motivation and career development. Theme analysis was used to assess qualitative feedback concerning priorities for future developments within the ultrasound role.

RESULTS

There were 561 responses, mainly from the UK, Ireland and Spain (81%). The majority (83.4%) of UK sonographers communicate findings to patients, compared with 27.1% in other EFRS countries. More engage with teaching (UK = 90.1%, non-UK 72.9%) compared with activities in the other advanced practice domains. The lowest involvement was the research domain, with only 33% actively involved in research. Radiographers were motivated to undertake ultrasound to develop their knowledge and skills and assume more responsibility.

CONCLUSION

Wide variations in ultrasound practice were seen across respondent countries. Generally, radiographers are happy with their ultrasound roles, although priorities include legislation for the sonographer role, remuneration, respect or support from medical colleagues, high quality education and role progression opportunities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings provide a better understanding of radiographer views which can assist radiographer societies and local teams to develop strategies to enhance advanced practice skills development and career prospects in ultrasound.

There's nothing plain about projection radiography! A discussion paper

OBJECTIVES

Unlike the technological advances in cross-sectional imaging, the adoption of CR and DR has been relatively overlooked in terms of the additional radiographer skills and competences required for optimal practice. Furthermore, projection radiography is often referred to as basic, plain or other words suggesting simplicity or entry-level skill requirements. Radiographers' professional identity is connected with the discourse expressed via the language used in daily practice and consequently, if the perception of projection radiography is regarded as simple practice not requiring much reflection or complex decision-making, apathy and carelessness may arise. The purpose of this narrative review was to raise projection radiography from its longstanding lowly place and re-position it as a specialist imaging field.

KEY FINDINGS

Danish pre-registration radiography curricula contain little mention of projection radiography and a low proportion (n = 17/144; 11.8%) of Danish radiography students chose to focus on projection radiography within publicly available BSc. theses between 2016 and 2020 as compared to topics related to CT and MRI (n = 60/144; 41.7%).

CONCLUSION

By changing how we as the profession perceive the role and position of projection radiography, we can start to rebuild its lost prestige and demand a greater, more detailed and clinically relevant educational offering from academic partners. For this to commence, the language and terminology we use to describe ourselves and tasks undertaken must reflect the complexity of the profession.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Regardless of imaging modality, every patient should be assured that a radiographer with expertise in acquiring images of diagnostic quality undertakes their examination. Reclaiming the prestige of projection radiography may lead students and radiographers to recognize projection radiography as a demanding specialist field for the benefit of the patients.

Effect of image quality and motivation of radiographer teams in mammography after dedicated training and the use of an evaluation tool like PGMI

INTRODUCTION

High quality and motivated staff are key factors for successful breast imaging teams. The aim of this study is to find out what effects intensive training of already experienced radiographers - including the embedment of evaluation tools and building a new routine workflow - has on image quality and how the motivation and satisfaction of employees change by that.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was planned to show changes in image quality simultaneously to motivation of the team after a dedicated training with an expert. Two readers evaluated the quality of 1496 mammograms (775 before, 721 after training) with PGMI (perfect/good/moderate/inadequate) in consensus. To record subjective long-term experiences of the alterations due to the training the radiographers were asked to fill in a written questionnaire.

RESULTS

After training the PGMI values considerably shift to a preferred level (p < 0.05) - higher values for P (8,9% to 25,5%) and G (38,2% to 57,1%) and lower values for M (34,1% to 15,4%) and I (18,8% to 1,9%). All radiographers have experienced noticeable improvement and benefit through the initiation of the training.

CONCLUSION

After training there is significant improvement in the image quality of mammograms and an increase in motivation and professional well-being of the radiographers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Due to the urgent need for high quality in breast diagnostics and the worldwide frequency of mammographic examinations, investments should be made to establish thoughtful training programs for radiographers and further develop possibilities for assessment like PGMI.

Radiographer advanced and consultant practice and community diagnostic hubs - a vision for the future

OBJECTIVES

This article combines a brief narrative review of the Richards Report with an overview of current radiographer advanced and consultant clinical practice (ACCP) to provide suggestions for future ACCP within radiography.

KEY FINDINGS

The 'Diagnostics: Recovery and Renewal' report by Professor Sir Mike Richards, published in 2020, has identified a need for improvements to be made to diagnostic services. His recommendations include the introduction of Community Diagnostic Hubs (CDHs) that would provide quicker and easier access to diagnostic tests for patients⁽¹⁾ A narrative review around the concept of Advanced and Consultant Clinical Practice (ACCP) for radiographers demonstrates the capability of the radiographers to expand their role. The article concludes with a vision of how CDHs could potentially provide multiple career pathways for radiographers working at this level of practice.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is acknowledged that some of these concepts are a combination of visionary and aspirational in outlook rather than being entirely based on current practice. The intention of this article, and the implications for practice, are to support on-going discussions to enable radiography, as a profession, to seek ways and opportunities to do things differently whilst ensuring that the patient remains at the centre of the services delivered.

Burnout in the disciplines of medical radiation science: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Burnout is seen as an occupational phenomenon related to workplace stress. Professional groups within medical imaging and radiation science have been reported to suffer from burnout in the past, however research into the profession has been limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate literature measuring levels and prevalence of burnout in the professional groups within medical imaging and radiation science (MIRS). These being radiographers (radiological technologists), sonographers, radiation therapists (therapeutic radiographers) and nuclear medicine technologists.

METHODS

Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Psycinfo and CINAHL were searched to locate studies published in English from 2000 that used a questionnaire/survey to measure burnout in the MIRS population. Also included were studies that measured burnout in a larger healthcare group that included MIRS professionals, as long as the MIRS professionals were reported as a separate group.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria; two of these articles reported the same data and therefore were combined to leave 15 studies to review. Of the radiation therapy group, seven of the nine studies reported low or moderate burnout amongst their participants. One study reported high levels of burnout in the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation domains, and another reported high emotional exhaustion levels. Within the other MIRS professions, five of the six studies reported moderate burnout. One group of sonographers had high levels of burnout in the emotional exhaustion domain.

CONCLUSION

For the past 20 years, levels of burnout in MIRS professionals has remained relatively steady, with the majority of studies reporting moderate levels of burnout. However, more research is needed in radiographers, sonographers and nuclear medicine technologists.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Even though the review indicates moderate level of burnout, this needs addressing on an organisational and individual level to ensure stress in the workplace is managed before burnout becomes a significant issue.

The radiology workforce's response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Middle East, North Africa and India

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the response of the radiology workforce to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on professional practice in India and eight other Middle Eastern and North African countries. It further investigated the levels of fear and anxiety among this workforce during the pandemic.

METHODS

A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey from 22 May-2 June 2020 among radiology workers employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey collected information related to the following themes: (1) demographic characteristics, (2) the impact of COVID-19 on radiology practice, and (3) fear and (4) anxiety emanating from the global pandemic.

RESULTS

We received 903 responses. Fifty-eight percent had completed training on infection control required for handling COVID-19 patients. A large proportion (79.5%) of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed that personal protective equipment (PPE) was adequately available at work during the pandemic. The respondents reported experiences of work-related stress (42.9%), high COVID-19 fear score (83.3%) and anxiety (10%) during the study period.

CONCLUSION

There was a perceived workload increase in general x-ray and Computed Tomography imaging procedures because they were the key modalities for the initial and follow-up investigations of COVID-19. However, there was adequate availability of PPE during the study period. Most radiology workers were afraid of being infected with the virus. Fear was predominant among workers younger than 30 years of age and also in temporary staff. Anxiety occurred completely independent of gender, age, experience, country, place of work, and work status.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is important to provide training and regular mental health support and evaluations for healthcare professionals, including radiology workers, during similar future pandemics.

Expectations of therapeutic radiography students in Wales about transitioning to practice during the Covid-19 pandemic as registrants on the HCPC temporary register

INTRODUCTION

The Covid-19 crisis continues to profoundly impact on radiotherapy practice in the UK. We explore the views of therapeutic radiographer students on entering their first post in unique circumstances as a means to evaluate the support that may minimise negative impacts on their transition to practitioners.

METHOD

Focus groups were conducted outside of students' final year educational programme and immediately prior to them starting work. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis.

RESULTS

Emergent themes from the eleven participants were: Covid-19 as a layer on top of underlying anxieties; Degree of readiness for imminent psychological, emotional and practical challenges; Feeling valued as a health professional/radiographer at this time; A mixed student and qualified staff professional identity as HCPC temporary registrants.

CONCLUSION

Uncertainties related to Covid-19 were seen to add a destabilising component to existing anxieties and challenges. In this context, there are significant risks of impaired professional socialisation due to incongruence between students' expectations and the reality in clinical departments.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Informed academic support and flexible clinical preceptorship that address anxieties and congruence barriers are vital to guide new practitioners through a health crisis that presents significant challenges but also opportunity for professional development.

The role of pediatric radiologists and radiographers: a different future from the past

The author of this paper reflects on the reality of pediatric radiology practice and pinpoints several constraints identified in the literature, constraints that limit the development of the role of pediatric radiologists and radiographers and therefore compromise the quality of medical imaging care delivered to the children. There is a need to build a pediatric imaging family of dedicated radiographers and radiologists at every hospital that has a radiology department. This strategy could improve the quality of the 350 million pediatric imaging procedures performed every year.

An evaluation of the current mentorship/preceptorship practices for newly qualified radiographers in Northern Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Mentorship/Preceptorship (M/P) has been utilised within the nursing profession since the early 1980's. Successful, structured M/P programmes can be hugely beneficial to Northern Ireland (NI) Trusts who recruit regularly and often rely on the fluidity of staff movement regionally. In the absence of standardised tools to accurately and universally measure the competency of newly qualified Radiographers (NQR) as they evolve, establishing the benchmark for effective practice within Radiology departments in NI is difficult and highly subjective at best. This study aimed to evaluate the current M/P strategies within NI as perceived by NQR and Radiology Managers (RM).

METHODS

A mix of both qualitative and quantitative data was obtained using questionnaires through a scoping exercise. Opinions were sought from a target audience of NQR, who began full-time employment following graduation in 2018, and RM involved in the delivery of current M/P programmes within the NI Trusts.

RESULTS

Responses were gained from all five NI trusts to achieve a representative regional sample, with final opinions of RM (n = 8, 54%) and NQR (n = 30, 67%) received. With the exception of one response, all NQRs confirmed receiving some form of M/P support within their inaugural post.

CONCLUSION

Significant variations were apparent in both the structure and delivery of Trust M/P induction programmes, calling into question the comparable competency of NQRs regionally.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The disparity in approach towards M/P programmes across NI, and subsequent lack of comparability of NQR competence, endorses the development of a more robust and universal method for the regional assessment of NQRs, such as that of the 'Flying Start NHS®' programme utilised by National Health Service (NHS) Scotland, in combination with knowledge and skills framework (KSF) practices in supervision.

Current videofluoroscopy practice in the United Kingdom: A survey of imaging professionals

INTRODUCTION

Videofluoroscopy (VFSS) is a frequently used radiological investigation for dysphagia and is conducted within a radiology setting by speech and language therapists (SLTs) working alongside imaging personnel (radiologists and/or radiographers). Previous surveys of SLT practice have reported variability in VFSS protocols and procedures. The aim of this study was to explore current clinical practice for VFSS from the perspective of imaging personnel engaged in VFSS within the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A comprehensive online survey enabled exploration of current practices of imaging professionals. Target participants were diagnostic imaging personnel (radiographers and radiologists) with experience of working in VFSS clinics. Descriptive statistics describe and summarise the data alongside inferential statistics where appropriate.

RESULTS

54 survey participants represented 40 unique acute healthcare organisations in the UK, in addition to two respondents from the Republic of Ireland. The survey demonstrated high variance in clinical practice across all stages of the VFSS procedure. Clinicians were not always compliant with current UK guidelines and the roles and responsibilities of different professionals working within the clinics were often not clearly defined.

CONCLUSION

Further research is required to develop new international, interprofessional VFSS guidelines to standardise service delivery for VFSS, improving diagnostic accuracy, efficiency and patient experience.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In the absence of VFSS guidelines for imaging personnel, practitioners should familiarise themselves with the UK Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists VFSS Position paper; IR (ME)R guidelines and DRLs for the client groups with which they work to guide clinics and improve practice. Clinicians should revisit protocols and clinical governance regarding safe practice in order to improve the quality of care within the VFSS clinic.

Patients', radiographers' and radiography students' experiences of 360° virtual counselling environment for the coronary computed tomography angiography: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to describe patients', radiographers' and radiography students' experiences of the developed 360° virtual counselling environment (360°VCE) for the coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA).

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative approach was used. The participants were cCTA patients (n = 10), radiographers (n = 10) and radiography students (n = 10) who used the 360°VCE and visited or worked at a university hospital in Finland. The 360°VCE, resembling the authentic environments of a CT imaging unit, included digital counselling materials in text, image, animation and video formats. Data were gathered through thematic interviews individually to obtain an understanding of participants' perspectives and analyzed by inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Five main categories and 15 categories were identified. Identified benefits of the 360°VCE for patients included improvements in knowledge, spatial and environmental orientation, and senses of security and self-efficacy, with reductions in fear and nervousness. Patients found the counselling materials engaging, and that the 360° technology conveniently provided reassuring familiarity with the environment before their visit. Identified benefits for radiographers and radiography students included improvements in patients' mental preparedness, knowledge, spatial and environmental orientation, and reductions in patients' fear, which eased procedures and enhanced diagnostic success. The 360°VCE also provided useful information and familiarization with the cCTA unit for students during clinical practice and staff of referring units.  CONCLUSION: It seems that patients', radiographers' and radiography students' experiences of 360°VCE respond to patients' needs by improved knowledge and reduced fears. Thus, current counselling practices can be usefully complemented with spherical panoramic imaging technology and online information delivery.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results may be used to improve patient counselling and care, thereby optimizing the cCTA examination procedure and reducing fear. However, further research is needed to characterize experiences of the 360° VCE more comprehensively.

Spanish radiographers' concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

The current outbreak of COVID-19 has caused worldwide healthcare and social emergency in which healthcare professionals were under extreme work conditions while being fearful of becoming infected or spreading the disease to their relatives. The perceived threat of COVID-19 has the potential to cause severe psychological maladjustment. The aim of the study is to explore Spanish radiographers’ concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This study was quantitative, observational and cross-sectional. The sample was made up of 546 radiographers working in Spain during the outbreak. The instrument used for analysis was an ad hoc questionnaire with socio-demographic questions and the questionnaire on perception of threat from COVID-19 validate to spanish healthcare professionals.

Results

The sample consisted of 70.1% of female, 29.7% of male and 0.2% undeclare sex participants. The results showed a high level of a perceived threat from COVID-19 (7.57 ± 0.088), furthermore we observed a high level of threat about the possibility of infecting family members (8.49 ± 0.25), patients (8.33 ± 0.086), and coworkers (8.35 ± 0.084). Furthermore, females have a higher level of a perception of threat to spread infection between patients (r = −0.136; p = 0.001) and coworkers (r = −0.118; p = 0.006), than males.

Conclusion

COVID-19 pandemic is perceived as a serious threat, being especially concerned about the threat of spreading the infection to family, coworkers, and patients. The perception of risk depends partly on professionals’ gender and family responsibilities.

Implications for practice

Our findings suggest that it is recommended that healthcare professionals receive formation to reinforce and improve their emotional competencies for coping successfully with potentially stressful situations like COVI19 pandemic.