Limited integrative repair capacity of native cartilage autografts within cartilage defects in a sheep model

An experimental investigation into the correlation between the diameter of reimplanted cartilage blocks and efficacy of cartilage regeneration after auricular reconstruction

Preventing thoracic deformities during auricular reconstruction is a challenge for surgeons who utilize multiple costal cartilage grafts to fabricate a 3-dimensional framework. Reimplantation of cartilage blocks reduces thoracic deformities, but there is no consensus on how to maximize the effectiveness of reimplantation. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the block diameter and the efficacy of cartilage regeneration at the donor site in a rabbit model. Seventy-two rabbits were randomly placed into 6 groups: those with reimplanted cartilage blocks with a diameter of (1) 0.7 mm, (2) 0.6 mm, (3) 0.5 mm, (4) 0.4 mm, (5) 0.3 mm, and (6) the control group. Cartilage blocks of various diameters were shredded and returned to the perichondrial pocket at the donor site. The efficacy of promoting biomechanical strength, cartilage tissue growth, activation of chondrocyte proliferation, and stimulation of cartilage-specific extracellular matrix secretion was assessed. The diameter of the implanted cartilage block was a highly correlated factor during regeneration. Smaller diameters with appropriate interstitial spaces between blocks promoted better cartilage tissue growth, chondrocyte proliferation, and extracellular matrix secretion. According to our findings, 0.4 mm is the maximum diameter for achieving the best regeneration performance (range, 0.3-0.7 mm).

Endogenus chondrocytes immobilized by G-CSF in nanoporous gels enable repair of critical-size osteochondral defects

Injured articular cartilage is a leading cause for osteoarthritis. We recently discovered that endogenous stem/progenitor cells not only reside in the superficial zone of mouse articular cartilage, but also regenerated heterotopic bone and cartilage in vivo. However, whether critical-size osteochondral defects can be repaired by pure induced chemotatic cell homing of these endogenous stem/progenitor cells remains elusive. Here, we first found that cells in the superficial zone of articular cartilage surrounding surgically created 3 × 1 mm defects in explant culture of adult goat and rabbit knee joints migrated into defect-filled fibrin/hylaro1nate gel, and this migration was significantly more robust upon delivery of exogenous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Remarkably, G-CSF-recruited chondrogenic progenitor cells (CPCs) showed significantly stronger migration ability than donor-matched chondrocytes and osteoblasts. G-CSF-recruited CPCs robustly differentiated into chondrocytes, modestly into osteoblasts, and barely into adipocytes. In vivo, critical-size osteochondral defects were repaired by G-CSF-recruited endogenous cells postoperatively at 6 and 12 weeks in comparison to poor healing by gel-only group or defect-only group. ICRS and O'Driscoll scores of articular cartilage were significantly higher for both 6- and 12-week G-CSF samples than corresponding gel-only and defect-only groups. Thus, endogenous stem/progenitor cells may be activated by G-CSF, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared bone-marrow stimulating factor, to repair osteochondral defects.

Within or Without You? A Perspective Comparing In Situ and Ex Situ Tissue Engineering Strategies for Articular Cartilage Repair

Human articular cartilage has a poor ability to self-repair, meaning small injuries often lead to osteoarthritis, a painful and debilitating condition which is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. Existing clinical strategies generally do not regenerate hyaline type cartilage, motivating research toward tissue engineering solutions. Prospective cartilage tissue engineering therapies can be placed into two broad categories: i) Ex situ strategies, where cartilage tissue constructs are engineered in the lab prior to implantation and ii) in situ strategies, where cells and/or a bioscaffold are delivered to the defect site to stimulate chondral repair directly. While commonalities exist between these two approaches, the core point of distinction-whether chondrogenesis primarily occurs "within" or "without" (outside) the body-can dictate many aspects of the treatment. This difference influences decisions around cell selection, the biomaterials formulation and the surgical implantation procedure, the processes of tissue integration and maturation, as well as, the prospects for regulatory clearance and clinical translation. Here, ex situ and in situ cartilage engineering strategies are compared: Highlighting their respective challenges, opportunities, and prospects on their translational pathways toward long term human cartilage repair.

Cationic contrast-enhanced computed tomography distinguishes between reparative, degenerative, and healthy equine articular cartilage

Cationic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a quantitative imaging technique that characterizes articular cartilage, though its efficacy in differentiating repair tissue from other disease states is undetermined. We hypothesized that cationic CECT attenuation will distinguish between reparative, degenerative, and healthy equine articular cartilage and will reflect biochemical, mechanical, and histologic properties. Chondral defects were created in vivo on equine femoropatellar joint surfaces. Within defects, calcified cartilage was retained (Repair 1) or removed (Repair 2). At sacrifice, plugs were collected from within defects, and at locations bordering (adjacent site) and remote to defects along with site-matched controls. Articular cartilage was analyzed via CECT using CA4+ to assess glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, compressive modulus (E _eq ), and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) II histologic score. Comparisons of variables were made between sites using mixed model analysis and between variables with correlations. Cationic CECT attenuation was significantly lower in Repair 1 (1478 ± 333 Hounsfield units [HUs]), Repair 2 (1229 ± 191 HUs), and adjacent (2139 ± 336 HUs) sites when compared with site-matched controls (2587 ± 298, 2505 ± 184, and 2563 ± 538 HUs, respectively; all p < .0001). Cationic CECT attenuation was significantly higher at remote sites (2928 ± 420 HUs) compared with Repair 1, Repair 2, and adjacent sites (all p < .0001). Cationic CECT attenuation correlated with ICRS II score (r = .79), GAG (r = .76), and E _eq (r = .71; all p < .0001). Cationic CECT distinguishes between reparative, degenerative, and healthy articular cartilage and highly correlates with biochemical, mechanical, and histological tissue properties.

The Challenge of Cartilage Integration: Understanding a Major Barrier to Chondral Repair

Articular cartilage defects caused by injury frequently lead to osteoarthritis, a painful and costly disease. Despite widely used surgical methods to treat articular cartilage defects and a plethora of research into regenerative strategies as treatments, long-term clinical outcomes are not satisfactory. Failure to integrate repair tissue with native cartilage is a recurring issue in surgical and tissue-engineered strategies, seeing eventual degradation of the regenerated or surrounding tissue. This review delves into the current understanding of why continuous and robust integration with native cartilage is so difficult to achieve. Both the intrinsic limitations of chondrocytes to remodel injured cartilage, and the significant challenges posed by a compromised biomechanical environment are described. Recent scaffold and cell-based techniques to repair cartilage are also discussed, and limitations of existing methods to evaluate integrative repair. In particular, the importance of evaluating the mechanical integrity of the interface between native and repair tissue is highlighted as a meaningful assessment of any strategy to repair this load-bearing tissue. Impact statement The failure to integrate grafts or biomaterials with native cartilage is a major barrier to cartilage repair. An in-depth understanding of the reasons cartilage integration remains a challenge is required to inform cartilage repair strategies. In particular, this review highlights that integration of cartilage repair strategies is frequently assessed in terms of the continuity of tissue, but not the mechanical integrity. Given the load-bearing nature of cartilage, evaluating integration in terms of interfacial strength is essential to assessing the potential success of cartilage repair methods.

Next-Generation Marrow Stimulation Technology for Cartilage Repair: Basic Science to Clinical Application

»

Given the relatively high prevalence of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions, including in patients who are <40 years of age, and an inability to detect some of these lesions until the time of arthroscopy, there is value in performing a single-stage cartilage procedure such as marrow stimulation (MS).

»

While the positive outcomes of first-generation MS (namely microfracture) have been observed to drop off after 24 months in several studies, improvements have been seen when compared with preoperative conditions for lesions that are 2 to 3 cm2 in size, and MS is considered to be a procedure with technical simplicity, fairly short surgical times, and relatively low morbidity. A recent study showed that autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation remain viable treatment options for chondral defects of the knee in the setting of failed MS.

»

Basic science principles that have been elucidated in recent years include (1) the creation of vertical walls during defect preparation, (2) an increased depth of subchondral penetration, (3) a smaller awl diameter, and (4) an increased number of subchondral perforations, which are all thought to help resolve issues of access to the mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and the subchondral bone structure/overgrowth issues.

»

Pioneering and evolving basic science and clinical studies have led to next-generation clinical applications, such as a hyaluronic acid-based scaffold (ongoing randomized controlled trial [RCT]), an atelocollagen-based gel (as described in a recently published RCT), a micronized allogeneic cartilage scaffold (as described in a recently completed prospective cohort study), and a biosynthetic hydrogel that is composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG) diacrylate and denatured fibrinogen (as described in an ongoing prospective study).

»

This review summarizes important points for defect preparation and the recent advances in MS techniques and identifies specific scaffolding augmentation strategies (e.g., mesenchymal augmentation and scaffold stimulation [MASS]) that have the capacity to advance cartilage regeneration in light of recent laboratory and clinical studies.

Current Applications of Growth Factors for Knee Cartilage Repair and Osteoarthritis Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The decreased contact area, edge loading, and increased stress in the adjacent area cartilage resulting from chondral defects are believed to predispose this tissue to degenerative changes that have significant economic implications, especially when considering its progression to osteoarthritis of the knee. Growth factors are considered therapeutic possibilities to enhance healing of chondral injuries and modify the progression to degenerative arthritis. Thus, the purposes of this review are to first to summarize important points for defect preparation and recent advances in techniques for marrow stimulation and second, and to identify specific growth factors and cytokines that have the capacity to advance cartilage regeneration and the treatment of osteoarthritis in light of recent laboratory and clinical studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

TGF-β, BMP-2, BMP-7, IGF-1, as IL-1 receptor antagonist, and recombinant human FGF-18 are some of the promising growth factor/cytokine treatments with pioneering and evolving clinical developments. The bulk of the review describes and discusses these developments in light of fundamental basic science. It is crucial to also understand the other underlying advances made in the surgical management of cartilage defects prior to onset of OA. These advances are in techniques for defect preparation and marrow stimulation, a common cartilage repair procedure used in combination with growth factor/cytokine augmentation. Multiple growth factor/cytokine modulation therapies are currently undergoing clinical trial investigation including Invossa (currently in phase III study), Kineret (currently in phase I study), and Sprifermin (currently in phase II study) for the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Creating Cartilage in Tissue-Engineered Chamber Using Platelet-Rich Plasma Without Cell Culture

Background: Clinically available cartilage, such as large-volume tissue-engineered cartilage, is urgently required for various clinical applications. Tissue engineering chamber (TEC) models are a promising organ-level strategy for efficient enlargement of cells or tissues within the chamber. The conventional TEC technology is not suitable for cartilage culture, because it lacks the necessary chondrogenic growth factor, which is present in platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In this study, we added autogenous auricular cartilage fragments mixed with PRP in a TEC to obtain a large amount of engineered cartilage. Experiment: To prove the efficacy of this method, 48 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups: PRP, vascularized (Ves), PRP, PRP+Ves, and control. Auricular cartilage was harvested from the rabbits, cut into fragments (2 mm), and then injected into TECs. Cartilage constructs were harvested at week 8, and construct volumes were measured. Histological morphology, immunochemical staining, and mechanical strength were evaluated. Results: At week 8, PRP+Ves constructs developed a white, cartilage-like appearance. The volume of cartilage increased by 600% the original volume from 0.30 to 1.8 ± 0.1789 mL. Histological staining showed proliferation of edge chondrocytes in the embedded cartilage in the PRP and PRP+Ves groups. Furthermore, the cartilage constructs in the PRP+Ves group show mechanical characteristics similar to those of normal cartilage. Conclusions: Auricular cartilage fragments mixed with PRP and vascularization of the TEC showed a significantly increased cartilage tissue volume after 8 weeks of incubation in rabbits. Impact Statement Repair of defects of ear cartilage tissue has always been a huge challenge to plastic surgeons. In this article, a new method is presented to produce within 8 weeks auricular cartilage in a tissue engineering chamber without cell culture. Having such a method is a valuable step toward creating a large volume of functional cartilage tissue, which may lead to successful construction of normal auricular structure with minimal donor-site morbidity.

Articular cartilage regeneration and tissue engineering models: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cartilage regeneration and restoration is a major topic in orthopedic research as cartilaginous degeneration and damage is associated with osteoarthritis and joint destruction. This systematic review aims to summarize current research strategies in cartilage regeneration research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Pubmed search for models investigating single-site cartilage defects as well as chondrogenesis was conducted and articles were evaluated for content by title and abstract. Finally, only manuscripts were included, which report new models or approaches of cartilage regeneration.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 2217 studies, 200 of which were eligible for inclusion in this review. The identified manuscripts consisted of a large spectrum of research approaches spanning from cell culture to tissue engineering and transplantation as well as sophisticated computational modeling.

CONCLUSIONS

In the past three decades, knowledge about articular cartilage and its defects has multiplied in clinical and experimental settings and the respective body of research literature has grown significantly. However, current strategies for articular cartilage repair have not yet succeeded to replicate the structure and function of innate articular cartilage, which makes it even more important to understand the current strategies and their impact. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to globally summarize experimental strategies investigating cartilage regeneration in vitro as well as in vivo. This will allow for better referencing when designing new models or strategies and potentially improve research translation from bench to bedside.

Large Animal Models for Osteochondral Regeneration

Namely, in the last two decades, large animal models - small ruminants (sheep and goats), pigs, dogs and horses - have been used to study the physiopathology and to develop new therapeutic procedures to treat human clinical osteoarthritis. For that purpose, cartilage and/or osteochondral defects are generally performed in the stifle joint of selected large animal models at the condylar and trochlear femoral areas where spontaneous regeneration should be excluded. Experimental animal care and protection legislation and guideline documents of the US Food and Drug Administration, the American Society for Testing and Materials and the International Cartilage Repair Society should be followed, and also the specificities of the animal species used for these studies must be taken into account, such as the cartilage thickness of the selected defect localization, the defined cartilage critical size defect and the joint anatomy in view of the post-operative techniques to be performed to evaluate the chondral/osteochondral repair. In particular, in the articular cartilage regeneration and repair studies with animal models, the subchondral bone plate should always be taken into consideration. Pilot studies for chondral and osteochondral bone tissue engineering could apply short observational periods for evaluation of the cartilage regeneration up to 12 weeks post-operatively, but generally a 6- to 12-month follow-up period is used for these types of studies.

Stimulation of a calcified cartilage connecting zone by GDF-5-augmented fibrin hydrogel in a novel layered ectopic in vivo model

Tissue engineering approaches for reconstructing full-depth cartilage defects need to comprise a zone of calcified cartilage to tightly anchor cartilage constructs into the subchondral bone. Here, we investigated whether growth and differentiation factor-5-(GDF-5)-augmented fibrin hydrogel can induce a calcified cartilage-layer in vitro that seamlessly connects cartilage-relevant biomaterials with bone tissue. Human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were embedded in fibrin hydrogel and subjected to chondrogenesis with TGF-β with or without GDF-5 before constructs were implanted subcutaneously into SCID mice. A novel layered ectopic in vivo model was developed and GDF-5-augmented fibrin with BMSCs was used to glue hydrogel and collagen constructs onto bone disks to investigate formation of a calcified cartilage connecting zone. GDF-5 significantly enhanced ALP activity during in vitro chondrogenesis while ACAN and COL2A1 mRNA, proteoglycan-, collagen-type-II- and collagen-type-X-deposition remained similar to controls. Pellets pretreated with GDF-5 mineralized faster in vivo and formed more ectopic bone. In the novel layered ectopic model, GDF-5 strongly supported calcified cartilage formation that seamlessly connected with the bone. Pro-chondrogenic and pro-hypertrophic activity makes GDF-5-augmented fibrin an attractive bioactive hydrogel with high potential to stimulate a calcified cartilage connecting zone in situ that might promote integration of cartilage scaffolds with bone. Thus, GDF-5-augmented fibrin hydrogel promises to overcome poor fixation of biomaterials in cartilage defects facilitating their long-term regeneration. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 2214-2224, 2018.