Enhancing fixation strength in periprosthetic femur fractures by orthogonal plating-A biomechanical study

Unstable Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: A biomechanical comparison between a novel C-shaped memory alloy implant and cerclage wiring

BACKGROUND

To compare the biomechanical stability of a novel, C-shaped nickel-titanium shape memory alloy (SMA) implant (C-clip) with traditional cerclage wiring in the fixation of a Vancouver B1 (VB1) periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF).

METHODS

In total, 18 synthetic femoral fracture models were constructed to obtain unstable VB1 fracture with an oblique fracture line 8 cm below the lesser trochanter. For each model, the distal portion was repaired using a 10-hole locking plate and four distal bi-cortical screws. The proximal portion was repaired using either three, threaded cerclage wirings or three, novel C-shaped implants. Specimens underwent biomechanical testing using axial compression, torsional and four-point bending tests. Each test was performed on three specimens.

RESULTS

The C-clip was statistically significantly stronger (i.e., stiffer) than cerclage wiring in the three biomechanical tests. For axial compression, medians (ranges) were 39 (39-41) and 35 (35-35) N/mm, for the C-clip and cerclage wiring, respectively. For torsion, medians (ranges) were, 0.44 (0.44-0.45) and 0.30 (0.30-0.33) N/mm for the C-clip and cerclage wiring, respectively. For the four-point bending test, medians (ranges) were 39 (39-41) and 28 (28-31) N/mm; for the C-clip and cerclage wiring, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results from this small study show that the novel, C-shaped SMA appears to be biomechanically superior to traditional cerclage wiring in terms of stiffness, axial compression, torsion and four-point bending, and may be a valuable alternative in the repair of VB1 PFF. Further research is necessary to support these results.

Does the type of medial plate fixation matter for supplemental fixation of distal femur fractures manage with a lateral pre-contoured locked plate? A Biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

Fixation of distal femur fractures with a lateral pre-contoured locking plate provides stable fixation and is the standard treatment in most cases, allowing early range of motion with a high rate of union. However, in situations, the stability achieved with the lateral plate alone may be insufficient, predisposing to fixation failure. The objective of the study was to compare, in synthetic bone models, the biomechanical behaviour of the fixation with a distal femur lateral pre-contoured locking plate solely and associated with a 3.5 mm proximal humeral locking plate applied upside down or a 4.5 mm helical locking compression plate on the medial side.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 15 solid synthetic left femur samples were used. A metaphysical defect at the level of the medial cortex was simulated. The samples were randomly distributed into three groups equally. All groups received a 4.5/5.0 mm single lateral 9-hole distal femur lateral pre-contoured locking plate. Group 1 had no supplementary plate. Group 2 received a supplementary 6-hole 3.5 mm proximal humeral locking plate and Group 3 received a supplementary 4.5/5.0 mm helical 14-hole narrow locking compression plate.

RESULTS

Both supplementary plate types used in groups 2 and 3 contributed to increase the apparent stiffness of the construct, but pairwise comparison showed statically significant difference only between group 1 and 3. No significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3.

CONCLUSION

Both supplementary plates might be considered for improving the fixation in distal femur fracture in selected cases.

Orthogonal plating of distal femur fractures: A biomechanical comparison with plate-nail and parallel plating constructs

Purpose

This study compared the biomechanical properties of orthogonal plating with plate-nail and parallel plating constructs for supracondylar distal femur fractures.

Methods

A supracondylar distal femur fracture was simulated using 15 synthetic osteoporotic femurs. Constructs included: (1) plate-nail (lateral locked distal femoral plate + retrograde intramedullary nail); (2) parallel plating (lateral locked distal femoral plate + medial 4.0 mm compression plate); and (3) orthogonal plating (lateral locked distal femoral plate + posterior one-third tubular plate). Specimens underwent nondestructive loading, fatigue loading, and loading to failure. Gapping at the fracture was measured using a three-dimensional motion capture system. Baseline torsional and axial stiffness, stiffness and strain after fatigue loading, and load to failure were determined. A case example of orthogonal plating is also presented.

Results

There was no difference in baseline torsional (p = 0.51) and axial stiffness (p = 0.53). Stiffness after fatigue loading was highest with parallel plating, with no difference between the plate-nail and orthogonal plating constructs (p = 0.84). Strain after fatigue loading was lowest in the parallel plating group (0.54 ± 0.19%), followed by the plate-nail (2.89 ± 0.83%) and orthogonal plating groups (3.04 ± 0.51%).

Conclusion

Orthogonal plating demonstrated comparable baseline stiffness to plate-nail and parallel plating constructs, and similar biomechanical performance in fatigue loading to plate-nail constructs. All specimens had ≤3% strain after fatigue loading, suggesting sufficient stability for fracture healing. The benefits of enhanced stability from dual-implant fixation may be achieved through orthogonal plating while avoiding an additional medial surgical approach, and therefore warrants further investigation as a novel alternative for distal femur fracture fixation.

Surgical outcomes of dual-plate fixation for periprosthetic femur fractures around a stable hip arthroplasty stem

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of periprosthetic femur fractures is increasing. Multiple treatment methods exist to treat fractures surrounding stable hip arthroplasty implants including locking plate fixation, cable fixation, allograft augmentation, and revision arthroplasty. No consensus regarding optimal treatment has been reached, and significant complications remain. Recently, biomechanical studies have demonstrated the benefits of orthogonal dual-plate fixation, but little clinical data exist. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of dual-plated periprosthetic femur fractures around stable hip stems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures following hip arthroplasty with a stable femoral stem treated with dual-plate fixation were identified through chart review at a single institution. Fracture classification, fixation characteristics, radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes and complications including re-operation were recorded.

RESULTS

Over a 12-year period, 31 patients (mean age 77 years at surgery, range 48-94) underwent dual plating by three traumatologists for implant-stable periprosthetic femur fractures surrounding a hip arthroplasty stem. There were 27 Vancouver B1-type and 9 inter-prosthetic fractures. Average follow-up was 2 years. Of the 26 patients with minimum 6-month follow-up, 24 (92%) united after index surgery (mean time to union 6.0 months, range 1.5-14.0). Mean time to full weight-bearing post-operatively was 2.6 months (range 1.5-4.0 months). Two patients required secondary surgery to address nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-plating achieved high union rates with an acceptable complication profile for the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures surrounding a stable hip arthroplasty stem. Our preferred fixation construct involves a lateral plate spanning the entire femur secured with non-locking bicortical screws supplemented with an anteriorly based reconstruction plate. Additional prospective research is required to confirm the results of this study.

Correlation of Bone Strength in an Animal Model (Rabbit) After Fracture and During the Period of Fixation with a Titanium Micro Plate

The period of bone healing after trauma goes through certain physiological processes. In situations where a bone fracture occurs, our intention is to surgically position in an appropriate morpho-anatomical position. For osteosynthesis we used vipla wire and micro plates with corresponding screws.

The aim of our research was to evaluate the optimal time for the removal of the osteosynthetic material, fracture site biomechanical stability, and measurement of the callus thickness.

For this research ten 4 months old rabbits with right leg femur fracture were used. Osteosynthesis was done with titanium micro plates, corresponding screws and vipla wire. Experimental animals were observed through the post-operative period at the first and seventh postoperative day and there on at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 weeks. Further additional fixation was needed in one of the rabbits in the second week.

The postoperative period provided us information about the optimal moment for the removal of titanium micro plates. It showed that over a period of six weeks, the bone had almost all normal biomechanical properties. Significantly greater strength and rigidity of the recovered femur were obtained after 12 weeks. Micro plates that were removed after 4, 6 or 9 weeks, did not need furhter fixation and therefore fixation was not applied, compared to those placed during the 12 weeks. X Ray evaluation provided us with follow up results of fracture healing.

The results suggest that it is acceptable to remove titanium micro plates after a period of healing, that is, after the formation of the callus and bridging of the fracture gap and diastasis with newly formed bone.

Plate configuration for biological reconstructions of femoral intercalary defect - a finite element evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Biological reconstruction was commonly used for femoral intercalary defect. The initial stability by plate fixation was believed to have an effect on bone union and implant failure. Our study was proposed to explore relationship of plate configuration and initial stability for femoral intercalary reconstruction using allo-/autograft.

METHODS

Femoral intercalary defect models were established with four different plate configurations: (1) Single lateral bridging plate, SLP (2) Lateral bridging plate + Orthogonal adjuvant plate, LP+OAP (3) Lateral bridging plate + Medial adjuvant plate, LP+MAP (4) Lateral bridging plate + Medial bridging plate, LP+MP. A diaphysis defect of 12 cm was simulated, and the removed native femoral bone was used as a structural allograft with the osteotomy gap of 2 mm. Models were analyzed by finite element simulations under an axial compression of 2000N and an axial moment of 10 Nm, respectively.

RESULTS

Axial load: (1) The peak von Mises stress of SLP, LP+OAP, LP+MAP, LP+MP were 993.50 MPa, 335.63 MPa, 240.03 MPa, 281.73 MPa, respectively and LP+MAP was the lowest (p < 0.01); (2) The mean displacement of SLP, LP+OAP, LP+MAP, LP+MP was 0.765, 0.130, 0.121, 0.235 mm, respectively. LP+MAP showed the best stability while SLP had a crash in the medial proximal gap; (3) The LP+MAP configuration had the most uniform stress distribution and the lowest maximum von Mises stress of 79.7 MPa within plates. Axial torsional load: (1) The peak von Mises stress of SLP, LP+OAP, LP+MAP, LP+MP were 431.66Mpa, 120.73 MPa, 72.31 MPa, 109.86 MPa, respectively; (2) The rotation angle of SLP, LP+OAP, LP+MAP, LP+MP was 4.30°, 1.35°, 1.20°, 1.57°, respectively. All of LP+OAP, LP+MAP and LP+MP showed an optimal torsional stability.

CONCLUSIONS

For femoral intercalary reconstruction using allo-/autograft fixed by plates, LP+MAP and LP+MP configurations showed superior stability in terms of axial compression and torsion load by FE simulation. A better stability was believed to be associated with higher union rate and lower hardware failure rate.

The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review

Background

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) represent a major cause for surgical revision after hip arthroplasty with detrimental consequences for patients. The Vancouver classification has been traditionally used since its introduction in 1995. The Unified Classification System (UCS) was described in 2014, to widen the spectrum by aiming for a more comprehensive approach. The UCS also aimed to replace the Vancouver classification by expanding the idea of the Vancouver classification to the whole musculoskeletal apparatus. After introduction of the UCS, the question was raised, whether the UCS found its place in the field of analysing PFFs. Therefore, this systematic review was performed to investigate, the use of the UCS compared to the established Vancouver classification.

Methods

Medline was searched for reports published between 1 January 2016 and 31 November 2020, without language restriction. Included were original articles, irrespective of the level of evidence and case reports reporting on a PFF and using either the Vancouver or the UCS to classify the fractures. Excluded were reviews and systematic reviews.

Results

One hundred forty-six studies were included in the analysis. UCS has not been used in a single registry study, giving a pooled cohort size of 3299 patients, compared to 59,178 patients in studies using the Vancouver classification. Since 2016, one study using UCS was published in a top journal, compared to 37 studies using the Vancouver classification (p=0.29). During the study period, the number of yearly publications remained stagnant (p=0.899).

Conclusions

Despite valuable improvement and expansion of the latter UCS, to date, the Vancouver system clearly leads the field of classifying PFFs in the sense of the common use.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05240-w.

Simplified Mechanical Tests Can Simulate Physiological Mechanics of a Fixation Construct for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Plate fractures after fixation of a Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) are difficult to treat and could lead to severe disability. However, due to the lack of direct measurement of in vivo performance of the PFF fixation construct, it is unknown whether current standard mechanical tests or previous experimental and computational studies have appropriately reproduced the in vivo mechanics of the plate. To provide a basis for the evaluation and development of appropriate mechanical tests for assessment of plate fracture risk, this study applied loads of common activities of daily living (ADLs) to implanted femur finite element (FE) models with PFF fixation constructs with an existing or a healed PFF. Based on FE simulated plate mechanics, the standard four-point-bend test adequately matched the stress state and the resultant bending moment in the plate as compared with femur models with an existing PFF. In addition, the newly developed constrained three-point-bend tests were able to reproduce plate stresses in models with a healed PFF. Furthermore, a combined bending and compression cadaveric test was appropriate for risk assessment including both plate fracture and screw loosening after the complete healing of PFF. The result of this study provides the means for combined experimental and computational preclinical evaluation of PFF fixation constructs.

LOQTEQ® VA Periprosthetic Plate-A New Concept for Bicortical Screw Fixation in Periprosthetic Fractures: A Technical Note

Internal fixation using angle stable plates is the treatment standard in periprosthetic fractures around stable implants. To provide instant postoperative full weight-bearing, bicortical screw fixation is advisable but often surgically demanding. This work presents the first clinical results of the LOQTEQ^® VA Periprosthetic Plate (aap Implantate AG, Berlin, Germany), a new plate system to simplify screw placement around implants. This plate system uses insertable hinges that allow for variable angle screw anchorage. Data of 26 patients with a mean age of 80 years and a mean follow-up of 13.9 months were retrospectively collected. Patients were clinically and radiologically examined. Bony union was achieved in 14 out of 15 patients with no signs of non-union or implant loosening. One patient, however, presented with implant failure. Clinical scores demonstrated acceptable results. Since the hinge plates are easy to apply, the first results are promising.

Biomechanics of periprosthetic femur fractures and early weightbearing

PURPOSE

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is expected to rise increase by 4.6% every 10 years between 2015 and 2060. There are few large series examining optimal fixation constructs or the influence of early ambulation on outcome. The purpose of this narrative review is to investigate the published biomechanical considerations for periprosthetic fracture fixation, with specific consideration of early postoperative weightbearing.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify fracture incidences, etiology, and current trends in weightbearing after fixation. Benefits of early weightbearing, current constructs, and biomechanics are reviewed.

RESULTS

The limited data available support medical benefits and increased union rates with early mobilization. Optimal fixation constructs are not agreed upon, but mechanical studies suggest that dual implant constructs can support physiologic weightbearing loads.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical trials are required to investigate fracture union and hardware complications in dual implant construct.

Management of low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures

AIMS

Debate continues regarding the optimum management of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs). This study aims to determine which operative treatment is associated with the lowest perioperative morbidity and mortality when treating low (Su type II and III) PDFFs comparing lateral locking plate fixation (LLP-ORIF) or distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 60 consecutive unilateral (PDFFs) of Su types II (40/60) and III (20/60) in patients aged ≥ 60 years: 33 underwent LLP-ORIF (mean age 81.3 years (SD 10.5), BMI 26.7 (SD 5.5); 29/33 female); and 27 underwent DFA (mean age 78.8 years (SD 8.3); BMI 26.7 (SD 6.6); 19/27 female). The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, calculated blood loss, transfusion requirements, functional mobility status, length of acute hospital stay, discharge destination and mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for reoperation after LLP-ORIF.

RESULTS

Follow-up was at mean 3.8 years (1.0 to 10.4). One-year mortality was 13% (8/60). Reoperation was more common following LLP-ORIF: 7/33 versus 0/27 (p = 0.008). Five-year survival for reoperation was significantly better following DFA; 100% compared to 70.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.8% to 89.8%, p = 0.006). There was no difference for the endpoint mechanical failure (including radiological loosening); ORIF 74.5% (56.3 to 92.7), and DFA 78.2% (52.3 to 100, p = 0.182). Reoperation following LLP-ORIF was independently associated with medial comminution; hazard ratio (HR) 10.7 (1.45 to 79.5, p = 0.020). Anatomical reduction was protective against reoperation; HR 0.11 (0.013 to 0.96, p = 0.046). When inadequately fixed fractures were excluded, there was no difference in five-year survival for either reoperation (p = 0.156) or mechanical failure (p = 0.453).

CONCLUSION

Absolute reoperation rates are higher following LLP fixation of low PDFFs compared to DFA. Where LLP-ORIF was well performed with augmentation of medial comminution, there was no difference in survival compared to DFA. Though necessary in very low fractures, DFA should be used with caution in patients with greater life expectancies due to the risk of longer term aseptic loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):635-643.

Biomechanical evaluation of retrograde docking nailing to a total hip arthroplasty stem in a periprosthetic femur fracture model

INTRODUCTION

Slotted nails allow a connection to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) stem and act as intramedullary load carrier. This study compares construct stiffness, cycles to failure and failure load between a retrograde slotted femur nail construct docked to a THA stem and a lateral locking plate in a human periprosthetic femur fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In seven pairs of fresh-frozen human anatomic femora with cemented THA, a transverse osteotomy was set simulating a Vancouver type B1 fracture. The femora were instrumented pairwise with either a retrograde slotted nail coupled to the prosthesis stem, or a locking plate plus a locking attachment plate. Four-point mediolateral bending, torsional and axial bending construct stiffness was investigated via non-destructive tests. Cyclic testing under progressively increasing physiologic loading was performed at 2 Hz until catastrophic construct failure.

RESULTS

Mediolateral bending stiffness did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.17) but exhibited a biphasic profile with significantly increased stiffness in both groups (P<0.01). Nail constructs provided a significantly lower torsional stiffness (0.49 ± 0.66 Nm/°) than plate constructs (1.70 ± 0.86 Nm/°), P=0.03. Axial bending stiffness did not differ significantly between the groups (Nail: 605 ± 511 N/mm; Plate: 381 ± 428 N/mm), P=0.61. Cycles to failure and failure load were significantly higher for the plate constructs (25'700 ± 8'341; 3'070 ± 1334 N) compared with the nail constructs (20'729 ± 7'949; 2'573 ± 1295 N), P=0.04.

CONCLUSION

The docking nail construct provides an intramedullary fixation with connection to the prosthesis stem; however, it is biomechanically weaker in stable fractures compared to the plate construct.

Onlay fibula autografting technique and its comparison with cortical allograft for the reconstruction of periprosthetic bone defects around the femur

BACKGROUND

Bone defect around the femur related to revisions or periprosthetic fractures (PFF) is an issue. We present a bone defect reconstruction technique in femoral revisions and/or PFF using fibula autograft and compared our radiological and clinical results to that of allograft.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty and/or PFF fixation with the use of cortical fibula autograft (FG group) or cortical allograft (CG group) were evaluated. After exclusions, 20 patients who had minimum two years of follow-up were investigated for each group, for their radiological and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In FG and CG groups, the median ages were 69.5(44-90) and 62(38-88) years, follow-ups were 59(28-72) and 120(48-216) months, defect lengths were seven (1-10) and ten (1-17) cm, and grafts lengths were 16.5(10-30) and 20(12-37) cm, respectively. The rate of graft incorporation was 90% in each group and median time to incorporations were seven (4-12) and 12(6-24) months (p < 0.001), and graft resorption (moderate and severe) rates were 10% and 25% (p = 0.41), respectively. Median Harris Hip (77.6 vs 78.0), WOMAC (23.2 vs 22), SF-12 physical (50.0 vs 46.1), and SF-12 mental (53.8 vs 52.5) scores were similar between the groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses revealed an estimated mean survival of 100% at six years in FG group and 90% at 14 years in CG group.

CONCLUSION

In the reconstruction of periprosthetic bone defects after femoral revision or PPF, onlay cortical fibula autografts provide comparable clinical and radiological outcomes to allografts. Its incorporation is faster, it is cost-effective and easy to obtain without apparent morbidity.

A biomechanical study on the laminate stacking sequence in composite bone plates for vancouver femur B1 fracture fixation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Composite bone plates are proposed for fracture fixation in periprosthetic femoral fracture. Metallic plates, having high stiffness compared to bone lead to stress shielding, reduce the compression force in the fracture site, affectthe healing process. Reduction of stiffness in the axial direction due to above reason without lowering the stiffness in transverse to avoid much of shear strain and thus avoiding instability at the fracture site leads to selective stress shielding. This can only be achieved through meticulously designed fiber reinforced composite. In the present work varied fiber orientations in the stacked laminates with varied fiber types are employed in a post-operative femur fixation for the in-silico analyses of their effectiveness using finite element analysis.

METHODS

In this study a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) model is constructed with composite bone plates. Three-dimensional narrow type metal plate is modeled with 12 holes and length of 194 mm. Three different types of composite bone plates are modeled with 12 holes of different size for the analysis i.e. Type 1 (5.6 mm thickness and 16 mm width), Type 2 (6 mm thickness and 16 mm width) and Type 3(6 mm thickness and 18 mm width). Anatomical 3D FE models of THA with composite bone plates are constructed to find out the interfacial stresses and strains. The finite element software ANSYS is used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

A three-dimensional FE model of immediately post-operative femur fixation is developed and studied the maximum stress distribution, strain and movement in axial/shear direction in the metal and composite bone plate near to the fracture site. In the present study, the metal and composite plate (carbon/epoxy, glass/epoxy and flax/epoxy) used for most common Vancouver type B1 fracture to observe the biomechanical behavior of different models in IPO condition using FEA.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing the fiber orientations of composite bone plates of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) model by controlling the biomechanical stresses could be a favorable approach. The finite element analysis approach gives a viable solution to design the composite bone plate and for designing future models that preserves the biomechanical function of THA with composite bone plate.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation in Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures: A biomechanical study comparing two plate systems

Introduction

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur are an increasing problem in today's trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Owing to the hip stem, implant anchorage is very difficult in the proximal femur. This study compares two plate systems regarding their biomechanical properties and the handling in periprosthetic fracture fixation of the proximal femur.

Materials and methods

Using eight pairs of fresh, frozen human proximal femora the Locking Compression Plate/Locking Attachment Plate construct (LCP/LAP) (group I, DePuy Synthes) was compared to the new LOQTEQ® periprosthetic distal lateral femur plate (group II, AAP Implantate AG). After implantation of press fit femoral hip stems a Vancouver B1 fracture model was used. Biomechanical testing was performed by cyclic axial loading with a constant increment of 0.1 N/cycle starting from 750 N axial loading. Every 250 cycles an a.p. x-ray was done to evaluate failure.

Results

The Group II showed significant higher axial stiffness (+42%) compared with Group I. In addition, Group II withstood significantly more load-cycles until failure (20%). The mode of catastrophic failure was plate breakage in Group II, whereas, in Group I, all plates showed an early bending followed by plate breakage.

Discussion and conclusion

Both plate systems enable screw placement around hip stems. The hinge plate showed superior biomechanical results compared with the locking compression plate/locking attachment plate construct. Furthermore, the hinge plate offers variable hinges and variable angel locking making bicortical screw placement around hip stems more comfortable and safe.

The translational potential of this article

The results of this study can be directly transferred to patient care. With the innovative hinge plate, the surgeon has a biomechanically superior implant, which also offers improved options for screw placement compared to a standard locking plate.

[Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles]

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) are becoming an increasingly important topic in orthopedics and trauma surgery due to the rising number of endoprosthetic joint replacements. The recently published unified classification system (UCS) has replaced numerous historical classification systems and can be applied to all PPFx regardless of the bone or joint involved. The treatment of PPFx requires individual therapeutic concepts taking patient-dependent and patient-independent factors into consideration. The conservative treatment of PPFx is only justified in exceptional situations. In contrast, the choice between operative treatment and deciding between osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty is particularly based on the assessment of the implant stability. In order to achieve fracture consolidation and also a good functional outcome, knowledge of the basic biomechanical principles of operative (osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis) treatment of periprosthetic fractures is necessary.

Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: A register study of 639 cases in Sweden

AIM

To investigate demographics and outcomes of Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained from medical charts of cases reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and/or from the National Patient Register. Vancouver type C fractures undergoing surgery between 2001 and 2011, in patients who had received their primary THR between 1979 and 2011, were included. Any further reoperation performed between 2001 and 2013 and related to the PPFF constituted the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 632 patients with 639 Vancouver type C fractures were identified. The majority of the patients were women (84%) and they had a fracture distal to a cemented stem (95%). The mean age at the time of fracture was 72 years. Treatment was performed with a locking plate (363 cases), a conventional plate (184 cases), an intramedullary nail (62 cases), or with double plating (30 cases). The overall reoperation rate was 17%, and mortality within one year of the operation was 16%. Locking plates had a significantly lower reoperation rate than conventional plates (p<0.001) and intramedullary nailing (p = 0.005). Interprosthetic femoral fractures did not have a statistically different outcome compared with non-IPFFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest reoperation rate was observed using locking plates in Vancouver type C fractures when compared with conventional plates or intramedullary nailing. The presence of an ipsilateral knee prosthesis did not influence the outcome of the surgical treatment.

Are proximal screws necessary for osteosynthesis of stable-stem periprosthetic femoral fractures fixed with non-locking plate and cable?

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the cable-plate-cable technique which comprises fixation of the proximal fragment using cable loops without additional proximal screws on the plate for the treatment of stable-stem periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip prostheses.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed Vancouver types B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with a dynamic compression plate combined with Dall-Miles cable between 2010 and 2016 at a single institution and followed for at least 12 months. Patients were treated with proximal fragment fixation using cable combined with screws (Group I) or with proximal fragment fixation using cable alone (Group II). Demographic data, fracture types, and clinical and radiological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included (Group I, n = 23 patients; Group II, n = 27). Fracture union was achieved in 49 patients with one case of non-union in Group I and no cases of non-union in Group II. Mean time to union was 5.4 months in Group I and 5.1 months in Group II (P = 0.624). Mean Harris hip score at latest assessment was 69.5 in Group I and 69.4 in Group II (P = 0.919). Regarding complications, there was one deep wound infection, one stem subsidence, and one loss of reduction in Group I, and one stem subsidence in Group II. No significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes between groups was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The cable-plate-cable technique sufficiently treats Vancouver types B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures without use of additional screws in the proximal fragment.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing - Part II

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fracture is a severe complication of total hip arthroplasty. A previous review published in 2011 summarised the biomechanical studies regarding periprosthetic femoral fracture and its fixation techniques. Since then, there have been several commercially available fracture plates designed specifically for the treatment of these fractures. However, several clinical studies still report failure of fixation treatments used for these fractures.

METHODS

The current literature on biomechanical models of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation since 2010 to present is reviewed. The methodologies involved in the experimental and computational studies of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation are described and compared with particular focus on the recent developments.

FINDINGS

Several issues raised in the previous review paper have been addressed by current studies; such as validating computational results with experimental data. Current experimental studies are more sophisticated in design. Computational studies have been useful in studying fixation methods or conditions (such as bone healing) that are difficult to study in vivo or in vitro. However, a few issues still remain and are highlighted.

INTERPRETATION

The increased use of computational studies in investigating periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation techniques has proven valuable. Existing protocols for testing periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation need to be standardised in order to make more direct and conclusive comparisons between studies. A consensus on the 'optimum' treatment method for periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation needs to be achieved.

Why and how do locking plates fail?

Locking plates have led to important changes in bone fracture management, allowing flexible biological fracture fixation based on the principle of an internal fixator. The technique has its indications and limitations. Most of the typical failure patterns arise from basic technical errors. Types of locking plates, material properties and the general principles of locking plate applications are reviewed together with their misapplication.

Reporting the Fatigue Life of 316L Stainless Steel Locking Compression Plate Implants: The Role of the Femoral and Tibial Biomechanics During the Gait

In this study, the fatigue characteristics of femoral and tibial locking compression plate (LCP) implants are determined accounting for the knee biomechanics during the gait. A biomechanical model for the kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint during the complete gait cycle is proposed. The rotations of the femur, tibia, and patella about the knee joint during the gait are determined. Moreover, the patellar-tendon force (PT), quadriceps-tendon force (QT), the tibiofemoral joint force (TFJ), and the patellofemoral joint force (PFJ) through the standard gait cycle are obtained as functions of the body weight (BW). On the basis of the derived biomechanics of the knee joint, the fatigue factors of safety along with the fatigue life of 316L stainless steel femoral and tibial LCP implants are reported as functions of the BW and bone fracture location, for the first time. The reported results reveal that 316L stainless steel LCP implants for femoral surgeries are preferred for conditions in which the bone fracture is close to the knee joint and the BW is less than 80 kg. For tibial surgeries, 316L stainless steel LCP implants can be used for conditions in which the bone fracture is close to the knee joint and the BW is less than 100 kg. This study presents a critical guide for the determination of the fatigue characteristics of LCP implants. The obtained results reveal that the fatigue analyses should be performed on the basis of the body biomechanics to guarantee accurate designs of LCP implants for femoral and tibial orthopedic surgeries.

Biomechanical investigation of two plating systems for medial column fusion in foot

Background

Arthrodesis of the medial column (navicular, cuneiform I and metatarsal I) is performed for reasons such as Charcot arthropathy, arthritis, posttraumatic reconstruction or severe pes planus. However, the complication rate is still high and mainly resulting from inadequate fixation. Special plates, designed for medial column arthrodesis, seem to offer potential to reduce the complication rate. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanically plantar and dorsomedial fusion of the medial column using two new plating systems.

Methods

Eight matched pairs of human cadaveric lower legs were randomized in two groups and medial column fusion was performed using either plantar or dorsomedial variable-angle locking compression plates. The specimens were biomechanically tested under cyclic progressively increasing axial loading with physiological profile of each cycle. In addition to the machine data, mediolateral x-rays were taken every 250 cycles and motion tracking was performed to determine movements at the arthrodesis site. Statistical analysis of the parameters of interest was performed at a level of significance p = 0.05.

Results

Displacement of the talo-navicular joint after 1000, 2000 and 4000 cycles was significantly lower for plantar plating (p≤0.039) while there was significantly less movement in the naviculo-cuneiform I joint for dorsal plating post these cycle numbers (p<0.001). Displacements in all three joints of the medial column, as well as angular and torsional deformations between the navicular and metatarsal I increased significantly for each plating technique between 1000, 2000 and 4000 cycles (p≤0.021). The two plating systems did not differ significantly with regard to stiffness and cycles to failure (p≥0.171).

Conclusion

From biomechanical point of view, although dorsomedial plating showed less movement than plantar plating in the current setup under dynamic loading, there was no significant difference between the two plating systems with regard to stiffness and cycles to failure. Both tested techniques for dorsomedial and plantar plating appear to be applicable for arthrodesis of the medial column of the foot and other considerations, such as access morbidity, associated deformities or surgeon's preference, may also guide the choice of plating pattern. Further clinical studies are necessary before definitive recommendations can be given.

Double plating in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: A biomechanical study

Periprosthetic hip fractures are an increasing problem in modern orthopedic and trauma surgery. Many options for the operative treatment are available to the surgeon ranging from modern variable angular systems to standard plates, screws, and cerclages. However, there is no gold standard and therefore, the aim of this study, was to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of double plating versus a lateral standard plate in a Vancouver B1 fracture model. Ten 4th generation composite femora were used to implant cementless total hip prosthesis and create Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures. Afterwards, the osteotomies were fixed using the locking compression plate in combination with the locking attachment plate (LCP, LAP, DePuy Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland)-group I. Group II additionally achieved a 5-hole 4.5/5.0 mm LCP anteriorly. Each construct was cyclically loaded to failure in axial compression. Axial construct stiffness was 50.87 N/mm (SD 1.61) for group I compared to 738.68 N/mm (SD 94.8) for group II, this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.016). The number of cycles to failure was also significant higher for group II (2,375 vs. 13,000 cycles; p = 0.016). Double plating can significantly increase construct stiffness and stability, and thus, is an option in the treatment of complex periprosthetic fractures, in revision surgery and for patients with the inability to partial weight bear. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:234-239, 2017.