Acute bone loss following SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice

Osteonecrosis as a manifestation of Long-COVID Syndrome: a systematic review

Purpose SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus responsible for COVID-19 pandemic. Some authors described the set of persistent symptoms COVID-related as "Long-COVID Syndrome." Several cases of post-COVID-19 osteonecrosis (ON) are described. Our primary aim was to study the hypothetical correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ON; our secondary aim was to understand if ON can be considered part of Long-COVID. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviewers and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Because COVID-19 is a recently described disease, we included all levels of evidence studies. We excluded studies lacking specification regarding the use of corticosteroids (CCS) and studies not related to COVID-19. The variables extracted were age, sex, risk factors, affected joints, signs and symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray features, histology, treatment of COVID-19, dose and duration of treatment with CCS, treatment of ON, follow-up, and treatment outcome. Results A total of 13 studies were included, involving 95 patients and 159 joints. Time between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the onset of symptoms related to ON was 16 weeks on average. Time between the onset of symptoms and the MRI was 6 weeks. An average of 926.4 mg of prednisolone equivalent per patient were administered. On average, CCS were administered for 20.6 days. Conclusions Patients with a history of COVID-19 infection developed osteonecrosis prematurely and with a lower dose of CCS than usually reported in the literature. Symptoms of osteonecrosis occur within the interval of the period described as Long-COVID. Surgeons should not underestimate the persistence of arthralgia when a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and use of CCS is reported.

The Evaluation of New-Generation Biomarker sCD14ST Provides New Insight into COVID-19's Effect on Bone Remodeling

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased interest in osteoimmunology because of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on both the immune system and the bone microenvironment. Soluble CD14ST could influence the production of the osteoimmunological regulators of osteoclast differentiation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of sCD14ST in COVID-19's effects on bone remodeling-evaluating, in particular, the correlation with new-generation osteoimmunological biomarkers-and to acquire comprehensive knowledge of the effects of the disease on the immune and skeletal system. Methods: The serum level of sCD14ST was measured in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients undergoing orthopedic surgery and correlated with the inflammatory and osteoimmunological biomarkers RANKL/OPG, FGF23, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), sRAGE, and SuPAR. Results: In our patients, sCD14ST showed a strong increase in COVID-19-positive patients, and a significant decrease in tandem with the infection resolution, confirming its diagnostic and prognostic value. sCD14ST was more clinically relevant than the two canonically inflammatory makers used in the clinical protocols, CRP and PCT, and displayed a good positive correlation with FGF23, RANKL/OPG, IL-6, and SuPAR and a negative correlation with sRAGE. Conclusions: Monitoring sCD14ST along with SuPAR may offer valuable insights into immune system dysregulation and bone-related complications in conditions characterized by inflammation. These soluble receptors represent important links between immune activation and bone metabolism, especially in the context of diseases like COVID-19, where the inflammatory response may impact bone fragility.

Non-union of a Tibial Plafond Fracture in a COVID-Positive Patient: A Case Report

Introduction

Several studies have proposed a relationship between the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced cytokine storm and prohibitive effects on the musculoskeletal system, including increased risk of fracture, osteoporosis, and impaired bone healing. To our knowledge, this is the first known case report involving a fracture non-union concomitant with COVID-19 infection and apparent cytokine storm.

Case Report

A 47-year-old male presented with an open pilon fracture of the left ankle after falling off a 6-foot ladder. At his 4-month post-operative follow-up, the patient attempted to ambulate without his cam boot for the 1st time, causing acute displacement of his poorly healed tibia fracture. A non-union laboratory workup demonstrated elevated inflammatory markers indicative of septic non-union; however, the patient also tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at this time. Because of this, antibiotic treatment was not initiated due to suspicion of a cytokine storm. One month later, the patient's inflammatory markers had decreased and he underwent revision surgery.

Conclusion

This case underscores the potential impact of COVID-19 on fracture healing and the importance of vigilant monitoring and differential diagnosis in managing non-union in COVID-19-positive patients.

Incidence and Outcomes of Vertebral Compression Fracture Among Patients Infected with COVID-19

Background/Objectives: Early studies have suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has a deleterious effect on bone mineral density and may increase the risk of pathological fractures. This study characterized vertebral compression fractures in patients with and without a prior diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: Using a nationwide claims database, this retrospective study used ICD-10 billing codes to identify patients with a diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture from January 2020 to April 2022. Two cohorts were created based on whether the patients had a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcome measures were characterized by descriptive analysis. Results: In total, 413,425 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, a total of 23,148 patients (5.60%) had a diagnosis of COVID-19 at the time of their compression fracture. Among the COVID-19 patients, the incidences of vertebral compression fracture were 0.42% in 2020 and 0.33% in 2021, in comparison to the historical average yearly incidence of 0.17% across all patients. The patients with COVID-19 at the time of compression fracture diagnosis had a higher rate of vitamin D deficiency (OR: 1.25) and a lower rate of routine healing (OR: 0.61). The patients without COVID-19 were more likely to be osteoporotic (OR: 0.88), experience additional compression fractures (OR: 0.38), and have kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty (OR: 0.73). Conclusions: Despite lower rates of osteoporosis, patients with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis exhibited a higher incidence of compression fractures. Although more research is needed, these results support increasing bone health surveillance in patients with a history of COVID-19 infection.

SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 drives osteoclastogenesis in preexisting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 and long-term complications in bone health. Emerging clinical evidence demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces bone turnover and promotes bone loss, but the mechanism underlying worsened bone health remains elusive. This study sought to identify specific immune mediators that exacerbated preexisting IMIDs after SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Plasma samples from 4 groups were analyzed: healthy, IMID only, COVID-19 only, and COVID-19 + IMID. Using high-throughput multiplexed proteomics, we profiled 1,500 protein biomarkers and identified 148 unique biomarkers in COVID-19 patients with IMIDs, including elevated inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-17F) and bone resorption markers. Long-term circulating SARS-CoV-2 ORF8, a virulence factor for COVID-19, was detected in the COVID + IMID group. RA was one of the most common IMIDs in our study. ORF8 treatment of RA-derived human osteoblasts (RA-hOBs) increased levels of inflammatory (TNF, IL6, CCL2) and bone resorption (RANKL/osteoprotegerin ratio) markers compared with healthy controls. Supernatants from ORF8-treated RA-hOBs drove the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclast-like cells. These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 exposure can exacerbate IMIDs through ORF8-driven inflammation and osteoclastogenesis, highlighting potential therapeutic targets for managing COVID-19-induced bone pathologies.

Effects of COVID-19 on bone fragility: a new perspective from osteoimmunological biomarkers

Introduction

While there is an increasing understanding of COVID-19's effect on different organs, little is known about the effect of the disease on bone turnover and remodeling so far. Osteoimmunological biomarkers have been described as potential indicators of bone remodeling in inflammatory conditions, but their potential role in evaluating the effect of COVID-19 on bone fragility has not been explored so far.

Methods

The present study aims to measure the osteoimmunological biomarkers in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, to evaluate the potential effect of COVID-19 on the bone response to the surgery.

Results

In our patients, the RANKL/OPG ratio indicated an increase of bone resorption in COVID-19-positive patients, confirming a strong diagnostic and prognostic value. RANKL/OPG displays a good correlation with the bone fragility maker FGF23, indicating that this parameter is a reliable maker of bone fragility in COVID-19 patients and could provide useful and comprehensive information about inflammation-induced bone loss. Consistently, the RANKL/OPG ratio showed a good correlation also with the two inflammatory markers IL-6 and sRAGE.

Discussion

Taken together these results indicate that the use of an osteoimmunological biomarker like the RANKL/OPG ratio could provide a significant improvement in the clinical evaluation of the COVID-19 effect on bone loss. This aspect is extremely important in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, which can manifest more severe effects of COVID-19 and present an increased level of age-induced bone fragility.

Immune Dysregulation in the Oral Cavity during Early SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Tissue-specific immune responses are critical determinants of health-maintaining homeostasis and disease-related dysbiosis. In the context of COVID-19, oral immune responses reflect local host-pathogen dynamics near the site of infection and serve as important "windows to the body," reflecting systemic responses to the invading SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study leveraged multiplex technology to characterize the salivary SARS-CoV-2-specific immunological landscape (37 cytokines/chemokines and 11 antibodies) during early infection. Cytokine/immune profiling was performed on unstimulated cleared whole saliva collected from 227 adult SARS-CoV-2+ participants and 37 controls. Statistical analysis and modeling revealed significant differential abundance of 25 cytokines (16 downregulated, 9 upregulated). Pathway analysis demonstrated early SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with local suppression of oral type I/III interferon and blunted natural killer-/T-cell responses, reflecting a potential novel immune-evasion strategy enabling infection. This virus-associated immune suppression occurred concomitantly with significant upregulation of proinflammatory pathways including marked increases in the acute phase proteins pentraxin-3 and chitinase-3-like-1. Irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 infection, prior vaccination was associated with increased total α-SARS-CoV-2-spike (trimer), -S1 protein, -RBD, and -nucleocapsid salivary antibodies, highlighting the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in eliciting mucosal responses. Altogether, our findings highlight saliva as a stable and accessible biofluid for monitoring host responses to SARS-CoV-2 over time and suggest that oral-mucosal immune dysregulation is a hallmark of early SARS-CoV-2 infection, with possible implications for viral evasion mechanisms.

Exploring the Pathophysiology of Long COVID: The Central Role of Low-Grade Inflammation and Multisystem Involvement

Long COVID (LC), also referred to as Post COVID-19 Condition, Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC), and other terms, represents a complex multisystem disease persisting after the acute phase of COVID-19. Characterized by a myriad of symptoms across different organ systems, LC presents significant diagnostic and management challenges. Central to the disorder is the role of low-grade inflammation, a non-classical inflammatory response that contributes to the chronicity and diversity of symptoms observed. This review explores the pathophysiological underpinnings of LC, emphasizing the importance of low-grade inflammation as a core component. By delineating the pathogenetic relationships and clinical manifestations of LC, this article highlights the necessity for an integrated approach that employs both personalized medicine and standardized protocols aimed at mitigating long-term consequences. The insights gained not only enhance our understanding of LC but also inform the development of therapeutic strategies that could be applicable to other chronic conditions with similar pathophysiological features.

The abortive SARS-CoV-2 infection of osteoclast precursors promotes their differentiation into osteoclasts

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the loss of millions of lives, although a majority of those infected have managed to survive. Consequently, a set of outcomes, identified as long COVID, is now emerging. While the primary target of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the respiratory system, the impact of COVID-19 extends to various body parts, including the bone. This study aims to investigate the effects of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection on osteoclastogenesis, utilizing both ancestral and Omicron viral strains. Monocyte-derived macrophages, which serve as precursors to osteoclasts, were exposed to both viral variants. However, the infection proved abortive, even though ACE2 receptor expression increased postinfection, with no significant impact on cellular viability and redox balance. Both SARS-CoV-2 strains heightened osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner, as well as CD51/61 expression and bone resorptive ability. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 induced early pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage polarization, shifting toward an M2-like profile. Osteoclastogenesis-related genes (RANK, NFATc1, DC-STAMP, MMP9) were upregulated, and surprisingly, SARS-CoV-2 variants promoted RANKL-independent osteoclast formation. This thorough investigation illuminates the intricate interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and osteoclast precursors, suggesting potential implications for bone homeostasis and opening new avenues for therapeutic exploration in COVID-19.

Sphingolipid-Induced Bone Regulation and Its Emerging Role in Dysfunction Due to Disease and Infection

The human skeleton is a metabolically active system that is constantly regenerating via the tightly regulated and highly coordinated processes of bone resorption and formation. Emerging evidence reveals fascinating new insights into the role of sphingolipids, including sphingomyelin, sphingosine, ceramide, and sphingosine-1-phosphate, in bone homeostasis. Sphingolipids are a major class of highly bioactive lipids able to activate distinct protein targets including, lipases, phosphatases, and kinases, thereby conferring distinct cellular functions beyond energy metabolism. Lipids are known to contribute to the progression of chronic inflammation, and notably, an increase in bone marrow adiposity parallel to elevated bone loss is observed in most pathological bone conditions, including aging, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and osteomyelitis. Of the numerous classes of lipids that form, sphingolipids are considered among the most deleterious. This review highlights the important primary role of sphingolipids in bone homeostasis and how dysregulation of these bioactive metabolites appears central to many chronic bone-related diseases. Further, their contribution to the invasion, virulence, and colonization of both viral and bacterial host cell infections is also discussed. Many unmet clinical needs remain, and data to date suggest the future use of sphingolipid-targeted therapy to regulate bone dysfunction due to a variety of diseases or infection are highly promising. However, deciphering the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of this diverse and extremely complex sphingolipidome, both in terms of bone health and disease, is considered the next frontier in the field.

SARS-CoV-2 and its Multifaceted Impact on Bone Health: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

SARS-CoV-2 infection, the culprit of the COVID-19 pandemic, has been associated with significant long-term effects on various organ systems, including bone health. This review explores the current understanding of the impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection on bone health and its potential long-term consequences.

RECENT FINDINGS

As part of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, bone health changes are affected by COVID-19 both directly and indirectly, with multiple potential mechanisms and risk factors involved. In vitro and preclinical studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may directly infect bone marrow cells, leading to alterations in bone structure and osteoclast numbers. The virus can also trigger a robust inflammatory response, often referred to as a "cytokine storm", which can stimulate osteoclast activity and contribute to bone loss. Clinical evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may lead to hypocalcemia, altered bone turnover markers, and a high prevalence of vertebral fractures. Furthermore, disease severity has been correlated with a decrease in bone mineral density. Indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 on bone health, mediated through muscle weakness, mechanical unloading, nutritional deficiencies, and corticosteroid use, also contribute to the long-term consequences. The interplay of concurrent conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and kidney dysfunction with SARS-CoV-2 infection further complicates the disease's impact on bone health. SARS-CoV-2 infection directly and indirectly affects bone health, leading to potential long-term consequences. This review article is part of a series of multiple manuscripts designed to determine the utility of using artificial intelligence for writing scientific reviews.

COVID-19 and Bone Loss: A Review of Risk Factors, Mechanisms, and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

SARS-CoV-2 drove the catastrophic global phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in a multitude of systemic health issues, including bone loss. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings related to bone loss and potential mechanisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

The early clinical evidence indicates an increase in vertebral fractures, hypocalcemia, vitamin D deficiencies, and a loss in BMD among COVID-19 patients. Additionally, lower BMD is associated with more severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preclinical models have shown bone loss and increased osteoclastogenesis. The bone loss associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection could be the result of many factors that directly affect the bone such as higher inflammation, activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, recruitment of Th17 cells, the hypoxic environment, and changes in RANKL/OPG signaling. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 infection can exert indirect effects on the skeleton, as mechanical unloading may occur with severe disease (e.g., bed rest) or with BMI loss and muscle wasting that has also been shown to occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Muscle wasting can also cause systemic issues that may influence the bone. Medications used to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection also have a negative effect on the bone. Lastly, SARS-CoV-2 infection may also worsen conditions such as diabetes and negatively affect kidney function, all of which could contribute to bone loss and increased fracture risk. SARS-CoV-2 can negatively affect the bone through multiple direct and indirect mechanisms. Future work will be needed to determine what patient populations are at risk of COVID-19-related increases in fracture risk, the mechanisms behind bone loss, and therapeutic options. This review article is part of a series of multiple manuscripts designed to determine the utility of using artificial intelligence for writing scientific reviews.