Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion for unresectable metastatic melanoma or sarcoma to the liver: a single institution experience

Anesthesia-specific Protocol for Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Procedures

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) procedures are being increasingly utilized to treat metastatic liver disease from uveal melanoma. The authors' institution has more than 15 years of experience with over 200 PHP procedures performed, far surpassing any other center in the United States. The anesthetic safety profile for PHP procedures is favorable and begins with preoperative patient evaluation and optimization. Intraoperative anesthetic management can be challenging, with extreme fluctuations seen in blood pressure and heart rate associated with direct hepatic artery chemotherapy delivery and the venovenous bypass circuit. Patients often need maximal doses of vasopressors for a short time period to treat these hemodynamic disturbances. Postoperatively, patients require a variety of blood products to resolve coagulopathy and may need diuretics to treat fluid overload. Anesthesia- and procedure-associated complications are rare and include anaphylaxis, arrhythmias, cardiac ischemia, pulmonary edema, and bleeding. PHP procedures are generally well-tolerated, and an anesthesia-specific protocol is imperative for their success.

Regional Therapies for Melanoma and Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have the potential to develop into advanced, regionally metastatic disease that is not always amenable to resection and is associated with a worse survival. Intralesional therapies, including oncolytic vaccines, xanthene dyes, immune modulating cytokines, and regional perfusions such as isolated limb infusion and perfusion, including isolated limb and hepatic perfusion and percutaneous hepatic perfusion, have been used in the treatment of advanced cutaneous and uveal melanoma and MCC. These therapies are effective and have a role in the multimodality treatment of these patients and may be synergistically used with conventional immune and targeted therapies.

An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies

An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.

Advances in the management of regionally metastatic melanoma

Despite numerous developments in systemic therapy, the prognosis for patients with locoregionally advanced melanoma remains poor. By delivering therapy directly to the targeted area via intralesional injections or intra-arterial isolated infusions, systemic side effects are minimized and oncolytic agents are delivered more directly and effectively to the melanoma. There has been significant progress in recent years with intralesional agents such as Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), PV-10 and TAVOkinase/electrocorporation as well as advances in infusional therapies such as percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) for hepatic metastasis of ocular melanoma. This review evaluates advances in intralesional and infusional therapies for melanoma while limiting discussion to those therapies currently approved and on trial.

Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.

Intralesional and Infusional Updates for Metastatic Melanoma

Locoregionally advanced and metastatic melanoma represent a challenging clinical problem, but in the era of immune checkpoint blockade and intralesional and infusional therapies, more options are available for use. Isolated limb infusion (ILI) was first introduced in the 1990s for the management of advanced melanoma, followed by the utilization of isolated extremity perfusion (ILP). Following this, intralesional oncolytic viruses, xanthene dyes, and cytokines were introduced for the management of in-transit metastases as well as unresectable, advanced melanoma. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oncolytic intralesional therapy, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated efficacy in the management of advanced melanomas, and this improvement in outcomes has been extrapolated to aid in the management of in-transit metastatic disease. Finally, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), also approved by the FDA, has been reported to have a significant impact on the treatment of hepatic disease in uveal melanoma. While some of these treatments have less utility due to inferior outcomes as well as higher toxicity profiles, there are selective patient profiles for which these therapies carry a role. This review highlights intralesional and infusional therapies for the management of metastatic melanoma.

Successful application of chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion in metastatic uveal melanoma patient progressing after systemic treatment options: a case report

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare subtype of melanoma, accounting for less than 5% of all melanoma cases. Metastatic UM differs notably from cutaneous melanoma, exhibiting variations in etiology, prognosis, driver mutations, metastatic patterns, and poor responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Beyond local treatment options, such as resection, radiation therapy, and enucleation, and systemic treatments, such as ICIs, the approval of tebentafusp, a bispecific gp100 peptide-HLA-directed CD3 T-cell engager, marks a breakthrough in treating HLA-A*02:01 metastatic UM. Despite the advancements in treatment options, the long-term survival rates remain inadequate. We report a patient with metastatic UM who previously received ICI and progressed on tebentafusp treatment but subsequently exhibited a remarkable response to local treatment targeting liver metastasis. Such observations highlight the significance of exploring sequential therapeutic strategies for advanced UM, offering potential avenues to enhance treatment efficacy and patient prognosis.

Troponin Elevation in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) is a liver directed regional therapy recently FDA approved for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver involving percutaneous isolation of liver, saturation of the entire liver with high-dose chemotherapy and filtration extracorporeally though in line filters and veno-venous bypass. The procedure is associated with hemodynamic shifts requiring hemodynamic support and blood product resuscitation due to coagulopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cardiac safety and subsequent clinically significant sequalae of this therapy.

METHODS

Consecutive PHP procedures done at our center between 2010-2022 were assessed retrospectively. Cardiac risk factors, post procedural cardiac enzymes, electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiograms along with 90-day cardiac outcomes were reviewed. All data were reviewed by cardio-oncologists at our institution.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients reviewed, mean age was 63 years and 57% were women. 132 procedures were performed with an average of 3.57 procedures per patient. 68.6% of patients had elevated troponin during at least 1 procedure. No patients were found to have acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, unstable arrhythmias, or cardiac death. No patients had notable echocardiographic changes. 10.8% of patients with positive troponin had asymptomatic transient electrocardiographic changes not meeting criteria for myocardial infarction. One patient had non-sustained ventricular tachycardiac intra-operatively which did not recur subsequently. Three patients died from non-cardiac causes within 90-days. There was no oncology treatment interruption, even in those with troponin elevation. In multivariable analysis, a history of hyperlipidemia was a predictor of postoperative troponin elevation. (P = .042).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion is safe and associated with a transient, asymptomatic troponin elevation peri-operatively without major adverse cardiac events at 90 days. The observed troponin elevation is likely secondary to coronary demand-supply mismatch related to procedural hemodynamic shifts, hypotension, and anemia.

A safety review of recently approved and late-stage trial treatments for metastatic melanoma: systemic and regional therapies

INTRODUCTION

Advanced melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-associated deaths. Over the past 15 years, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment options and prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma secondary to the development of novel systemic immunotherapies (IO) and targeted therapies. In addition to these novel systemic therapies, regional therapies (intralesional and perfusional) also continue to play a major role in the management of these patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review recent updates in the management of advanced melanoma via Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar, including recently published trials in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. We also review recently published trials for regional therapies and discuss future directions in the management of patients with advanced melanoma.

EXPERT OPINION

A significant portion of patients with advanced melanoma will develop recurrent or progressive disease following treatment with IO or targeted therapy. Therefore, identifying not only the appropriate therapeutic agent but also the sequence and duration of treatment is pivotal for these patients.

Regional chemotherapy for uveal melanoma liver metastases

Chemotherapy remains an important approach for the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanoma (UM). Compared with systemic chemotherapy, regional chemotherapy has similar efficacy and fewer systemic adverse effects. Regional chemotherapy for UM liver metastases includes hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). In this review, we aim to examine the efficacy of regional chemotherapy and compare HAI, TACE, and IHP in terms of overall survival (OS). The three approaches showed no obvious difference in OS results.

[Anesthesiological and postinterventional management in percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (chemosaturation)]

Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (PHMP) is a last-line treatment of inoperable primary or secondary liver tumors. Selective perfusion and saturation (chemosaturation) of the liver with the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan is performed via catheterization of the hepatic artery without affecting the rest of the body with its cytotoxic properties. Using an extracorporeal circulation and balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava, the venous hepatic blood is filtered and returned using a bypass procedure. During the procedure, considerable circulatory depression and coagulopathy are frequent. The purpose of this article is to review the anesthesiological and postprocedural management of patients undergoing PHMP with consideration of the pitfalls and special circumstances.

Chemosaturation of the Liver - an Update

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) is a treatment option for primary and secondary liver neoplasms and subject of intensive research. This present article provides an overview of CS-PHP regarding patient safety, feasibility and effectiveness based on recent studies.

METHOD

We performed a PubMed search including the search terms chemosaturation, hepatic chemosaturation, percutaneous perfusion and melphalan.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CS-PHP is a promising procedure for the treatment of uveal melanoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma. There are insufficient data regarding the effectiveness of CS-PHP with respect to other tumor entities. Since CS-PHP can be accompanied by multiple transient side effects and complications, close interdisciplinary cooperation is necessary.

KEY POINTS

· Chemosaturation of the liver is a safe procedure.. · CS-PHP is a potent therapy for hepatic metastatic ocular melanoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma.. · The procedure requires close interdisciplinary coordination.. · CS-PHP is a repeatable and thus long-term therapeutic option for some patients..

CITATION FORMAT

· Ebel S, Struck MF, van Boemmel F et al. Chemosaturation of the Liver - an Update. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 30 - 37.

Analysis of patient’s X-ray exposure in hepatic chemosaturation procedures: a single center experience

Background

Hepatic chemosaturation is a technique in which a high dose of the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan is administered directly into the liver while limiting systemic side effects. We reviewed our institutional experience regarding patient’s X-ray exposure caused by the procedure.

Methods

Fifty-five procedures, performed between 2016 and 2020 in 18 patients by three interventional radiologists (radiologist), were analyzed regarding the patient’s exposure to radiation. Dose-area-product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were correlated with the experience of the radiologist and whether the preprocedural evaluation (CS-EVA) and the procedure were performed by the same radiologist. Additionally, the impact of previous liver surgery on DAP/FT was analyzed.

Results

Experienced radiologist require less DAP/FT (50 ± 18 Gy*cm²/13.2 ± 3.84 min vs. 69 ± 20 Gy*cm²/15.77 ± 7.82 min; p < 0.001). Chemosaturations performed by the same radiologist who performed CS-EVA required less DAP/FT (41 ± 12 Gy*cm²/11.46 ± 4.41 min vs. 62 ± 11 Gy*cm²/15.55 ± 7.91 min; p < 0.001). Chemosaturations in patients with prior liver surgery with involvement of the inferior cava vein required significantly higher DAP/FT (153 ± 27 Gy*cm²/25.43 ± 4.57 min vs. 56 ± 25 Gy*cm²/14.44 ± 7.55 min; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

There is a significant learning curve regarding the procedure of hepatic chemosaturation. Due to dose reduction the evaluation and chemosaturation therapy should be performed by the same radiologist. Procedures in patients with previous liver surgery require higher DAP/FT.

Thrombotischer Verschluss der extrakorporalen Zirkulation während hepatischer Chemosaturation trotz zielgerechter Antikoagulation

Die perkutane hepatische Chemosaturation ist eine Behandlungsoption bei nichtresektablen primären oder sekundären Lebertumoren. Dabei wird der Bereich der Lebervenenmündung der Vena cava inferior (VCI) mittels 2 Ballons von der Zirkulation isoliert, sodass die systemische Verteilung des über die Leberarterie applizierten Chemotherapeutikums Melphalan verhindert wird. Nach Passage der Leber und venöser Drainage aus der retrohepatischen VCI durchläuft das chemosaturierte Blut 2 parallel geschaltete extrakorporale Filter. Anschließend wird das gereinigte Blut jugulär rückgeführt. Das Verfahren geht oft mit einer ausgeprägten hämodynamischen Instabilität einher, deren Ursache nicht abschließend geklärt ist. Zusätzlich stellt das Gerinnungsmanagement eine Herausforderung dar. Die Autoren berichten von einem Fall, bei dem sich trotz ausreichender „activated clotting time“ (ACT) ein Thrombus im rückführenden Schenkel der extrakorporalen Zirkulation bildete. Gezielte Problemsuche und -lösung waren parallel zur hämodynamischen Stabilisierung und interdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit notwendig, um die Intervention erfolgreich durchzuführen und der Patientin eine sichere Therapie zukommen zu lassen.

Efficacy and tolerability of chemosaturation in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma still have a poor outcome.

PURPOSE

To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response predictors in these patients treated with chemosaturation by percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (CS-PHP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between June 2015 and March 2020, a total of 29 patients (median age 69.7 years; age range 30-81 years; 60% women; median BMI 25.7 kg/m²; range 18.7-35.3kg/m²; 1-6 procedures per patient) were treated with 53 CS-PHPs. All patients received cross-sectional imaging for initial and follow-up examinations. Baseline tumor load, extrahepatic tumor load, tumor response, PFS, and OS were assessed. Non-parametric statistics were used.

RESULTS

After the initial CS-PHP, a partial response was observed in 11 patients (41%), stable disease in 12 patients (44%) and progressive disease in 4 patients (15%); two patients died before the response was evaluated. After initial CS-PHP, median OS was 12.9 ± 7.4 months and median PFS was 7.1 ± 7.4 months. OS after one year was 50%. After the second CS-PHP, median PFS was 7.9 ± 5.7 months. Seven patients had a liver tumor burden >25%, associated with a significantly shorter OS (6.0 ± 2.4 vs. 14.1 ± 12.7 months; P = 0.008). At the time of first CS-PHP, 41% (12/29) of the patients had extrahepatic metastases that did not affect OS (11.1 ± 8.4 months vs. 12.9 ± 13.6 months; P = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

CS-PHP is a safe and effective treatment for the hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma, especially for patients with a hepatic tumor burden <25%.

Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier

Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.

Repeated percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan can maintain long-term response in patients with liver cancers

Chemosaturation (CS; CHEMOSAT®, Delcath Systems Inc.) temporarily administers melphalan into the liver by percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP). CS-PHP can effectively control growth in liver tumors, but efficacy and tolerability of sequential treatments are unclear. We analyzed outcomes of sequential CS-PHP treatment. Patients with either unresectable intrahepatic metastases of ocular melanoma (OM, n = 9), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, n = 3), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 1) were recruited retrospectively. Response was assessed by tomography imaging. Ten patients (mean age 60 years) with more than one CS-PHP treatment were included. CS-PHP was administered 2-6 times in the OM patients, 3 times in the CCA, and the HCC patient received 6 treatments. Overall response rate (ORR) to CS-PHP was 80%, and stable disease was achieved in one patient. Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) was 336 days (range 0-354) for OM, 251 days for the CCA patient, and 256 days for the HCC patient. At the end of observation (153-701 days after first CS-PHP), 6/10 patients were still alive (5/9 with OM, 0 with CCA, and 1 with HCC). Death cases were not related to CS-PHP. Adverse events were mostly hematologic, grade I-IV, and self-resolving. The liver function was not deteriorated by CS-PHP. We conclude that repeated CS-PHP treatments were effective and well tolerated in the long term.

Initiation of Chemosaturation With Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Program in Interventional Radiology Department

Objectives Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a relatively new minimally-invasive liver-directed therapy, which aims to deliver high-dose chemotherapy into the liver with low systemic side effects. Initial studies showed promising results, especially in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. But unfamiliarity of the interventional radiologists prevents its widespread implantation in clinical routine. This study aimed to outline how to initiate a PHP program and report initial results. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent chemosaturation with PHP in our institution between March 2016 and February 2017 and their follow-up results till October 2018. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, clinical and imaging results, and complications were evaluated. Additionally, modifications regarding infrastructure and procedure techniques were described. Results A total of three patients (two females and one male) with a mean age of 59 underwent six PHP procedures. The primary disease was colorectal carcinoma in one patient and uveal melanoma in two patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the mean melphalan dose was 190.8 mg. No procedural death was observed. Patients were hospitalized for a mean of 3.3 days after procedures. Grade 3 and 4 complications were seen after 50% and 33.3% of procedures, respectively. Two patients showed partial response and the other patient showed stable disease after procedures. Mean hepatic progression-free survival was 10.8 months. Overall survival from the first procedure was 14.8 months in our cohort. Conclusion Our results show that chemosaturation with PHP offers a promising minimally invasive treatment option in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The technical challenges of PHP can be easily handled by an experienced interventional radiology (IR) team. It is a relatively safe procedure and its toxicities are usually hematological and can be manageable with close surveillance and appropriate medical therapies.

Meta-Analysis of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion and Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases

Simple Summary

Isolated hepatic perfusion is one of the available treatment options for patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. This is an open surgical procedure where the liver is isolated from the circulation and perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent. A modern development is the minimally invasive percutaneous hepatic perfusion, where the liver is endovascularly isolated and then perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent through a catheter in the arterial system. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to compare these modalities in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, complications and response.

Abstract

Background: Uveal melanoma is the most commonly occurring primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and patients have a high risk of developing metastatic disease, mostly in the liver. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a liver-directed therapy for patients with liver metastases. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a minimally invasive technique, is available as well. PHP benefits from the fact that the procedure can be repeated and therefore possibly offers better survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of nine articles reporting on eight studies were included in the analysis. Individual survival data were extracted from each study. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 months for IHP and 17.3 months for PHP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months for IHP and 9.6 months for PHP. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 10 months for IHP and 9.5 months for PHP. The complication rate and 30-day mortality rate were 39.1% and 5.5% for IHP and 23.8% and 1.8% for PHP. Conclusion: There was no difference in OS or PFS between IHP and PHP for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases, but patients have significantly less of a risk for complications and mortality following PHP.

Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion: Single center experience of procedural characteristics, hemodynamic response, complications, and postoperative recovery

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (PHMP) for the selective treatment of hepatic metastases is known to be associated with procedural hypotension and coagulation disorders. Studies on anesthetic management, perioperative course, complications, and postoperative recovery in the intensive care unit (ICU) have not been published.

METHODS

In a retrospective observational study, we analyzed consecutive patients who were admitted for PHMP over a 6-year period (2016-2021). Analyses included demographic, treatment, and outcome data with regard to short-term complications until ICU discharge.

RESULTS

Fifty-three PHMP procedures of 16 patients were analyzed. In all of the cases, procedure-related hypotension required the median (range) highest noradrenaline infusion rate of 0.5 (0.17-2.1) μg kg min-1 and fluid resuscitation volume of 5 (3-14) liters. Eighty-four PHMP-related complications were observed in 33 cases (62%), of which 9 cases (27%) involved grade III and IV complications. Complications included airway constriction (requiring difficult airway management), vascular catheterization issues (which resulted in the premature termination of PHMP, as well as to the postponement of PHMP and to the performance of endovascular bleeding control after PHMP), and renal failure that required hemodialysis. Discharge from the ICU was possible after one day in most cases (n = 45; 85%); however, in 12 cases (23%), prolonged mechanical ventilation was required. There were no procedure-related fatalities.

CONCLUSIONS

PHMP is frequently associated with challenging cardiovascular conditions and complications that require profound anesthetic skills. For safety reasons, PHMP should only be performed in specialized centers that provide high-level hospital infrastructures and interdisciplinary expertise.

Poor Response to Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Uveal Melanoma Highlights the Persistent Need for Innovative Regional Therapy Approaches to Manage Liver Metastases

Uveal melanoma is a cancer that develops from melanocytes in the posterior uveal tract. Metastatic uveal melanoma is an extremely rare disease that has a poor long-term prognosis, limited treatment options and a strong predilection for liver metastasis. Median overall survival has been reported to be 6 months and 1 year mortality of 80%. Traditional chemotherapy used in cutaneous melanoma is ineffective in uveal cases. Surgical resection and ablation is the preferred therapy for liver metastasis but is often not feasible due to extent of disease. In this review, we will explore treatment options for liver metastases from uveal melanoma, with a focus on isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). IHP offers an aggressive regional therapy approach that can be used in bulky unresectable disease and allows high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan to be delivered directly to the liver without systemic effects. Long-term median overall survival has been reported to be as high as 27 months. We will also highlight the poor responses associated with checkpoint inhibitors, including an overview of the biological rationale driving this lack of immunotherapy effect for this disease. The persistent failure of traditional treatments and immunotherapy suggest an ongoing need for regional surgical approaches such as IHP in this disease.

Over 12 Years Single Institutional Experience Performing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Unresectable Liver Metastases

Patients with unresectable hepatic metastases, from uveal or ocular melanoma, are challenging to treat with an overall poor prognosis. Although over the past decade significant advances in systemic therapies have been made, metastatic disease to the liver, especially from uveal melanoma, continues to be a poor prognosis. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a safe, viable treatment option for these patients. PHP utilizes high dose chemotherapy delivered directly to the liver while minimizing systemic exposure and can be repeated up to 6 times. Isolation of the hepatic vasculature with a double-balloon catheter allows for high concentration cytotoxic therapy to be administered with minimal systemic adverse effects. A detailed description of the multidisciplinary treatment protocol used at an institution with over 12 years of experience is discussed and recommendations are given. A dedicated team of a surgical or medical oncology, interventional radiology, anesthesiology and a perfusionist allows PHP to be repeatedly performed as a safe treatment strategy for unresectable hepatic metastases.

An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies

An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.

Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically.

RESULTS

After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.

Embolization of variant hepatic arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous hepatic perfusion for unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma

PURPOSE

In patients undergoing percutaneous liver perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP), the presence of variant hepatic arteries (HAs) may require catheter repositioning and thus prolong procedure time. Coil-embolization of variant HAs may enable M-PHP with a single catheter position as occlusion of variant HAs results in redistribution of flow through preexisting intrahepatic arterial collaterals. We aimed to evaluate whether redistribution of flow has any negative effect on therapeutic response in ocular melanoma patients undergoing M-PHP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pretreatment angiograms in all 32 patients that underwent M-PHP between January 2014 and March 2017 for unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma. Patients that underwent embolization of a variant left HA (LHA) or middle HA (MHA) during pretreatment angiography followed by at least one technically successful M-PHP were included for further analysis. Redistribution of arterial flow was evaluated on angiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. In each patient, tumor response in liver segments with redistributed blood flow was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, and then compared with tumor response in segments without flow redistribution. Follow-up scans were reviewed to evaluate progression of liver metastases.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients were included. Replaced LHA embolization resulted in redistribution of flow to segment(s) 2 (n=3), 2 and 3 (n=5), and 2, 3 and 4 (n=2). MHA embolization resulted in redistribution of flow to segment 4 (n=2). Successful redistribution was confirmed by angiography and/or CBCT in all patients. Tumor response was similar for redistributed and non-redistributed liver segments in 8 out of 9 patients (89%) according to RECIST 1.1, and in 7 out of 8 patients (88%) according to mRECIST. In three patients, tumor response was not evaluable according to RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST as metastases were too small to be categorized as target lesions (n=1), or target lesions were confined to non-redistributed segments (n=2). In one patient, tumor response was not evaluable according to mRECIST as target lesions in the redistributed segments were hypovascular. After a median follow-up time of 17.1 months (range, 9.1-38.5 months), hepatic progression was seen in 9 out of 12 patients with a median time to progression of 9.9 months (range, 2.5-17.7 months). Progression of liver metastases was never seen only in the redistributed liver segments.

CONCLUSION

Flow redistribution in liver segments by coil-embolization of variant HAs is a feasible technique that does not seem to compromise tumor response in patients undergoing M-PHP.

Intra-arterial perfusion-based therapies for regionally metastatic cutaneous and uveal melanoma

Locoregional disease remains a challenging problem in cutaneous melanoma and uveal melanoma. Arterial-based chemoperfusion strategies enable regional therapy delivery with minimal systemic toxicity. Herein we discuss intra-arterial therapies for in-transit cutaneous melanoma of the extremity including hyperthermic-isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion. We also discuss open (isolated hepatic perfusion) and percutaneous hepatic perfusion techniques for isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma. We review the current state of knowledge with respect to indications, procedural techniques, outcomes and expected toxicities for intra-arterial chemoperfusion for locoregional melanoma metastases.

Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion of melphalan for liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma: a single center experience

Objective

To investigate the outcome and safety data of chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) of melphalan in patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.

Material and methods

This is a HIPAA compliant, IRB approved, retrospective study. A total of 28 CS-PHPs were performed in 16 individual patients (six men and ten women, median age 63.1 years [range 49.1 to 78.7 years], one to six CS-PHP procedures per patient) for treatment of liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma between June, 2015 and December, 2018. All patients received cross-sectional imaging at baseline and during follow-up. CS-PHP was performed with the Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System (Delcath Systems, Inc., NY, USA) facilitating extracorporeal filtration of hepatic blood for melphalan removal. Ideal body weight-adjusted melphalan doses were administered into the hepatic arteries. Serious adverse events (SAE), progression-free survival based on response criteria in solid tumors, and overall survival were noted. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results

Partial response after first CS-PHP was observed in nine patients (60%), stable disease in five patients (33%) and progressive disease in one patient (7%). Median overall survival was 27.4 months (95% CI 4.1 to 35.4 month) after first CS-PHP. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months after first CS-PHP (95% CI 4.9 to 23.6 months). SAEs were observed in the majority of patients with most SAEs limited to grades one and two. Thirteen SAEs of grades three and four were observed in seven individual patients. No grade five SAE was observed.

Conclusion

CS-PHP is an efficacious and safe treatment for patients presenting with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.

Safety of Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Liver Metastases from Ocular Melanoma Using the Delcath Systems' Second-Generation Hemofiltration System: A Prospective Non-randomized Phase II Trial

Purpose

To investigate the safety and toxicity of percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) with the Delcath Systems’ second-generation (GEN 2) filter and compare the outcomes with historical data from studies using the first-generation filter.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, single-arm, single-center phase II study was carried out including 35 patients with unresectable, histologically confirmed liver metastases from ocular melanoma between February 2014 and June 2017. Main exclusion criteria were extrahepatic disease and age > 75 years. M-PHP was performed with melphalan 3 mg/kg (maximum dose 220 mg). Safety and toxicity were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.

Results

A total of 67 M-PHPs were performed in 35 patients (median 2 procedures). Although hematologic grade 3/4 events were seen in the majority of patients (thrombocytopenia 54.5%, leukopenia 75.6%, neutropenia 66.7%, anemia (only grade 3) 18.1%), these were all well manageable or self-limiting. Of the non-hematologic grade 3 events (n = 14), febrile neutropenia (n = 3), pulmonary emboli (n = 2) and post-procedural hemorrhage (n = 2) were most common. A case of sepsis with bacterial pharyngitis was the only non-hematologic grade 4 event. Prior therapy for liver metastases was found to be a predictor of late grade 3/4 neutropenia with an odds ratio of 5.5 (95% CI 1.4–21.7).

Conclusions

M-PHP using the GEN 2 filter has an acceptable safety and toxicity profile, and seems to reduce hematologic toxicity when compared to M-PHP with a first-generation filter. Prior therapy of liver metastases is a possible predictive factor in developing grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity.

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (chemosaturation) with melphalan in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: European multicentre study on safety, short-term effects and survival

OBJECTIVES

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumour with a poor overall prognosis. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a directed therapy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and its efficacy and safety have been shown in different entities. The purpose of this study was to prove the safety and efficacy of PHP in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 15 patients with unresectable iCCA treated with PHP in nine different hospitals throughout Europe. Overall response rates (ORR) were assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier estimation. Adverse events (AEs) and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were treated with 26 PHPs. ORR was 20%, disease control was achieved in 53% after the first PHP. Median OS was 26.9 months from initial diagnosis and 7.6 months from first PHP. Median PFS and hPFS were 122 and 131 days, respectively. Patients with liver-only disease had a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with locoregional lymph node metastases (12.9 vs. 4.8 months, respectively; p < 0.01). Haematological toxicity was common, but manageable. No AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred during the procedures.

DISCUSSION

PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with iCCA, especially in non-metastatic disease.

KEY POINTS

• Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) offers an additional locoregional therapy strategy for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary intrahepatic malignancies. • PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), especially in non-metastatic disease. • Side effects seem to be tolerable and comparable to other systemic or local treatment strategies.

Hepatic Progression-free and Overall Survival After Regional Therapy to the Liver for Metastatic Melanoma

OBJECTIVES

Regional therapy for metastatic melanoma to the liver represents an alternative to systemic therapy. Hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with liver metastases from cutaneous or uveal melanoma treated with yttrium-90 (Y90), chemoembolization (CE), or percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) was conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (6 Y90, 10 PHP, 12 CE, 1 PHP then Y90, 1 CE then PHP) were included. Multivariate analysis showed improved HPFS for PHP versus Y90 (P=0.004), PHP versus CE (P=0.02) but not for CE versus Y90. PFS was also significantly different: Y90 (54 d), CE (52 d), PHP (245 d), P=0.03. PHP treatment and lower tumor burden were significant predictors of prolonged PFS on multivariate analysis. Median OS from time of treatment was longest, but not significant, for PHP at 608 days versus Y90 (295 d) and CE (265 d), P=0.24. Only PHP treatment versus Y90 and lower tumor burden had improved OS on multivariate analysis (P=0.03, 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

HPFS and PFS were significantly prolonged in patients treated with PHP versus CE or Y90. Median OS in PHP patients was over double that seen in Y90 or CE patients but was significant only between PHP and Y90.

Challenges in chemotherapy delivery: comparison of standard chemotherapy delivery to locoregional vascular mass fluid transfer

Standard intravenous chemotherapy delivery to neoplasms relies on simple diffusion gradients from the intravascular to the interstitial space. Systemic perfusion creates untoward effects on normal tissue limiting both concentration and exposure times. Regional intra-arterial therapy is limited by drug recirculation and vascular isolation repeatability and does not address the interstitial microenvironment. Barriers to delivery relate to chaotic vascular architecture, heterogeneous fluid flux, increased interstitial and variable solid tumor pressure and ischemia. To address these difficulties, a delivery system was developed allowing mass fluid transfer of chemotherapeutic agents into the interstitium. This implantable, reusable system is comprised of multiple independently steerable balloons and catheters capable of controlling the locoregional hydraulic and oncotic forces across the vascular endothelium.

Prospective Clinical and Pharmacological Evaluation of the Delcath System's Second-Generation (GEN2) Hemofiltration System in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan

Introduction

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan is an effective treatment for patients with hepatic metastases, but associated with high rates of bone marrow depression. To reduce systemic toxicity, improvements have been made to the filtration system. In pre-clinical studies, the Delcath System’s GEN2 filter was superior to the first-generation filters. In this clinical study, we analysed the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of PHP using the new GEN2 filter.

Methods and Materials

Starting February 2014, two prospective phase II studies were initiated in patients with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma or colorectal cancer. In 10 PHP procedures performed in the first 7 enrolled patients, blood samples were obtained to determine filter efficiency and systemic drug exposure. PHP was performed with melphalan 3 mg/kg with a maximum of 220 mg. Complications were assessed according to CTCAE v4.03. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1.

Results

Pharmacokinetic analysis of blood samples showed an overall filter efficiency of 86% (range 71.1–95.5%). The mean filter efficiency decreased from 95.4% 10 min after the start of melphalan infusion to 77.5% at the end of the procedure (p = 0.051). Bone marrow depression was seen after up to 80.0% of 10 procedures, but was self-limiting and mostly asymptomatic. No hypotension-related complications or procedure-related mortality occurred.

Conclusion

The GEN2 filter has a higher melphalan filter efficiency compared to the first-generation filters and a more consistent performance. PHP with the GEN2 filter appears to have an acceptable safety profile, but this needs further validation in larger studies.

Percutaneous Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Isolated Hepatic Metastases of Uveal Melanoma: Patient Outcome and Safety in a Multi-centre Study

PURPOSE

Percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (PIHP) with Melphalan has been developed as a treatment for patients with isolated hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma. We discuss patient outcome and safety in a retrospective multi-centre study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2016 18 patients with un-resectable isolated hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma received single or repeated PIHP with Melphalan (n = 35) at seven sites. Progression-free time, overall survival time (OS) and tumour response by means of RECIST 1.1 criteria were evaluated. Peri- and post-procedural adverse events (AE) were registered. Patients' life quality was assessed using four-point scale questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 18 patients, initial PIHP treatment resulted in partial response (PR) in eight, stable disease (SD) in seven and progressive disease (PD) in three cases. Nine patients underwent second PIHP with PR in eight cases and PD in one case. Six patients were evaluated after third PIHP with PR in five patients and SD in one patient. Two patients received fourth PIHP with PD in both cases. Median OS was 9.6 months (range 1.6-41.0 months). Median progression-free survival time was 12.4 months (range 0.9-41.0 months) with 1-year survival of 44%. Most common post-procedural AE grade 3 and 4 were temporary leukopenia (n = 11) and thrombocytopenia (n = 8). Patients' self-assessments showed good ratings for overall health and quality of life with only slight changes after PIHP, and a high degree of satisfaction with PIHP treatment.

CONCLUSION

PIHP with Melphalan proved to be a relatively safe, minimal-invasive and repeatable treatment for patients with non-resectable hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.

Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion in Unresectable Hepatic Metastases

Background

In patients with hepatic metastases from solid-organ malignancies, surgical resection may be a potentially curative option, but it is not possible in most cases. Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion was developed for the management of unresectable metastases to the liver.

Methods

Relevant medical literature was summarized with regard to the outcomes and limitations of chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion.

Results

Six articles were identified that contained data on 91 individuals who received chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion. More than 60% of these study patients were diagnosed with ocular melanoma. The overall response rate was 48% and the rate of disease control was 90%. Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion improved the rates of overall and hepatic progression-free survival (PFS). The data are limited but suggest that the rate of PFS was improved in study patients with isolated melanoma hepatic metastases who received chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion compared with those assigned to standard care.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion produces favorable tumor response rates in select individuals with unresectable hepatic metastases from multiple primary cancers, particularly ocular and cutaneous melanomas. Data from a single randomized clinical trial have also shown that chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion can affect hepatic PFS in certain patients.

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver

Unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer can be treated with systemic chemotherapy, aiming to limit the disease, extend survival or turn unresectable metastases into resectable ones. Some patients however, suffer from side effects or progression under systemic treatment. For patients with metastasized uveal melanoma there are no standard systemic therapy options. For patients without extrahepatic disease, isolated liver perfusion (IHP) may enable local disease control with limited systemic side effects. Previously, this was performed during open surgery with satisfying results, but morbidity and mortality related to the open procedure, prohibited a widespread application. Therefore, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with simultaneous chemofiltration was developed. Besides decreasing morbidity and mortality, this procedure can be repeated, hopefully leading to a higher response rate and improved survival (by local control of disease). During PHP, catheters are placed in the proper hepatic artery, to infuse the chemotherapeutic agent, and in the inferior caval vein to aspirate the chemosaturated blood returning through the hepatic veins. The caval vein catheter is a double balloon catheter that prohibits leakage into the systemic circulation. The blood returning from the hepatic veins is aspirated through the catheter fenestrations and then perfused through an extra-corporeal filtration system. After filtration, the blood is returned to the patient by a third catheter in the right internal jugular vein. During PHP a high dose of melphalan is infused into the liver, which is toxic and would lead to life threatening complications when administered systemically. Because of the significant hemodynamic instability resulting from the combination of caval vein occlusion and chemofiltration, hemodynamic monitoring and hemodynamic support is of paramount importance during this complex procedure.

Hepatic Perfusion Therapy

Isolated hepatic perfusion uses the unique vascular supply of hepatic malignancies to deliver cytotoxic chemotherapy. The procedure involves vascular isolation of the liver and delivery of chemotherapy via the hepatic artery and extraction from retrohepatic vena cava. Benefits of hepatic perfusion have been observed in hepatic metastases of ocular melanoma and colorectal cancer and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Percutaneous and prophylactic perfusions are avenues of ongoing research.

Percutaneous Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for the Treatment of Unresectable Liver Malignancies

Liver malignancies are a major burden of disease worldwide. The long-term prognosis for patients with unresectable tumors remains poor, despite advances in systemic chemotherapy, targeted agents, and minimally invasive therapies such as ablation, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Thus, the demand for new and better treatments for malignant liver tumors remains high. Surgical isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) has been shown to be effective in patients with various hepatic malignancies, but is complex, associated with high complication rates and not repeatable. Percutaneous isolated liver perfusion (PHP) is a novel minimally invasive, repeatable, and safer alternative to IHP. PHP is rapidly gaining interest and the number of procedures performed in Europe now exceeds 200. This review discusses the indications, technique and patient management of PHP and provides an overview of the available data.

Results of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Phase III Trial of Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Compared with Best Available Care for Patients with Melanoma Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

There is no consensus for the treatment of melanoma metastatic to the liver. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (PHP-Mel) is a method of delivering regional chemotherapy selectively to the liver. In this study, we report the results of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing PHP-Mel with best alternative care (BAC) for patients with ocular or cutaneous melanoma metastatic to the liver.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 93 patients were randomized to PHP-Mel (n = 44) or BAC (n = 49). On the PHP-Mel arm, melphalan was delivered via the hepatic artery, and the hepatic effluent captured and filtered extracorporeally prior to return to the systemic circulation via a venovenous bypass circuit. PHP-Mel was repeatable every 4-8 weeks. The primary endpoint was hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and secondary endpoints included overall PFS (oPFS), overall survival (OS), hepatic objective response (hOR), and safety.

RESULTS

hPFS was 7.0 months for PHP-Mel and 1.6 months for BAC (p < 0.0001), while oPFS was 5.4 months for PHP-Mel and 1.6 months for BAC (p < 0.0001). Median OS was not significantly different (PHP-Mel 10.6 months vs. BAC 10.0 months), likely due to crossover to PHP-Mel treatment (57.1 %) from the BAC arm, and the hOR was 36.4 % for PHP-Mel and 2.0 % for BAC (p < 0.001). The majority of adverse events were related to bone marrow suppression. Four deaths were attributed to PHP-Mel, three in the primary PHP-Mel group, and one post-crossover to PHP-Mel from BAC.

CONCLUSION

This randomized, phase III study demonstrated the efficacy of the PHP-Mel procedure. hPFS, oPFS, and hOR were significantly improved with PHP-Mel. PHP with melphalan should provide a new treatment option for unresectable metastatic melanoma in the liver.

Transarterial Chemoembolization of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma Using Irinotecan-Loaded Beads: Treatment Response and Complications

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment response and complications of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma (UM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with DEBIRI (n = 14) were retrospectively analyzed regarding overall survival, compared to patients (n = 14) treated with intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC). Median overall survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of metastatic disease (OS1) and start of treatment (OS2). Radiological response for DEBIRI was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), obtained 1.5 months (range 1.2-3.7) post treatment. Major complications of DEBIRI were defined according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification for complications by outcome.

RESULTS

In the DEBIRI group, OS1 was 14.8 months (range 3.9-47.5), and OS2 was 9.4 months (range 1.7-39). Further, 11/13 (84.6%) of these patients had progressive disease on first follow-up CT and new lesions were seen in nine. There were 12 major complications in nine patients, possibly including one case of mortality due to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

CONCLUSION

For patients with liver metastases from UM, the effect on overall survival of DEBIRI alone is questionable. Compared to previous reports, the response rate of DEBIRI was poor, with new liver lesions observed in the majority of patients. Major complications possibly included one case of DIC.

Selective targeting of liver cancer with the endothelial marker CD146

Hepatocellular carcinomas are well-vascularized tumors; the endothelial cells in these tumors have a specific phenotype. Our aim was to develop a new approach for tumor-specific drug delivery with monoclonal antibody targeting of endothelial ligands. CD146, a molecule expressed on the endothelial surface of hepatocellular carcinoma, was identified as a promising candidate for targeting. In the present study, endothelial cells immediately captured circulating anti-CD146 (ME-9F1) antibody, while antibody binding in tumors was significantly higher than in hepatic endothelium. Macroscopically, after intravenous injection, there were no differences in the mean accumulation of anti-CD146 antibody in tumor compared to liver tissue , due to a compensating higher blood vessel density in the liver tissue. Additional blockade of nontumoral epitopes and intra-arterial administration, improved selective antibody capture in the tumor microvasculature and largely prevented antibody distribution in the lung and liver. The potential practical use of this approach was demonstrated by imaging of radionuclide-labeled ME-9F1 antibody, which showed excellent tumor-selective uptake. Our results provide a promising principle for the use of endothelial markers for intratumoral drug delivery. Tumor endothelium-based access might offer new opportunities for the imaging and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver malignancies.

Isolated hepatic perfusion with oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan in patients with metastases confined to the liver: A phase I study

AIM

To improve isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), we performed a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the optimal oxaliplatin dose in combination with a fixed melphalan dose.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and July 2008, 11 patients, comprising of 8 colorectal cancer and 3 uveal melanoma patients and all with isolated liver metastases, were treated with a one hour IHP with escalating doses of oxaliplatin combined with 100 mg melphalan. Samples of blood and perfusate were taken during IHP treatment for pharmacokinetic analysis of both drugs and patients were monitored for toxicity, response and survival.

RESULTS

Dose limiting sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) occurred at 150 mg oxaliplatin. The areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC) of oxaliplatin at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of 100 mg oxaliplatin ranged from 11.9 mg/L h to 16.5 mg/L h. All 4 patients treated at the MTD showed progressive disease 3 months after IHP.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of similar and even higher doses of oxaliplatin applied in both systemic treatment and hepatic artery infusion (HAI), applying this dose in IHP is not expected to improve treatment results in patients with isolated hepatic metastases.