Analysis of clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma

Reconstructive approaches to oncologic upper and lower extremity resection in pediatric populations: A retrospective NSQIP-P analysis of 428 patients

INTRODUCTION

Tumors of the soft tissue and bone in the upper and lower extremities are more common in pediatric populations than the general adult population and often require surgical resection or amputation. This retrospective study characterizes reconstructive approaches to such cases and subsequent postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

All oncologic upper and lower extremity resection or amputation cases from 2013-2022 were identified in the NSQIP Pediatric database. Reconstructive approaches for each case were characterized. The main outcome of interest was the occurrence of ≥1 postoperative complication. Predictors of flap reconstruction and predictors of postoperative complications were assessed with stepwise logistic regression (p<0.05).

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 428 cases. Most common reconstructive approaches included pedicled flaps (24.3%) and complex closure (8.9%). The rate of flap reconstruction increased from 4.4% in 2013-2016 to 34.6% in 2020-2022. Malignant tumors (odds ratio [OR]: 23.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.32-57.8) predicted higher likelihood of flap reconstruction than benign tumors, and proximal region (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15-0.51) predicted lower likelihood of flap reconstruction. Postoperative complications occurred in 19.9% of cases. Malignant tumors (OR: 4.39, 95% CI: 2.18-8.85) predicted higher likelihood of complications, and small soft tissue tumors (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.77) predicted lower likelihood of complications than bone tumors.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric flap reconstruction of extremity tumors is largely reserved for cases with high oncologic burden and osseous tumors in the distal anatomical regions, including the tibia/fibula and forearm. Future work may assess flap reconstruction in other anatomical areas.

Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis.

RESULTS

In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis.

CONCLUSION

To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment.

A Systematic Review of the Orthoplastic Approach in Adult Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The orthoplastic approach to patient care has changed the way patients with a wide variety of lower extremity pathology are treated. Through a systematic review, we aim to analyze outcomes in adult patients with lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas who undergo an orthoplastic flap management approach to their care.

METHODS

A systematic review of adult lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma excision with plastic surgery flap reconstruction was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines searching the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2023.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening, and full-text review, 26 articles were accepted for inclusion. The total mean follow-up duration was 32.0 ± 24.3 months. Reconstruction used microvascular free flaps in 65.5% (487/743), while 34.5% (256/743) were local flaps. 85.8% (307/358) of patients ambulated postoperatively. Revision surgery was required in 21% of patients during their respective follow-up periods. The limb salvage rate was 93.4% (958/1,026). Among pooled surgical outcomes, 22.2% (225/1,012) of patients experienced a perioperative complication.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that although complication rates in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma reconstruction may be further optimized, a multidisciplinary flap reconstructive approach provides high rates of limb salvage and functional postoperative ambulation.

Evaluation of modified frailty index for predicting post-operative outcomes after lower-extremity free-flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for complex procedures such as microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremities is an important part of preoperative planning and counseling. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the modified five-item frailty index (5-mFI) score, a validated tool for assessing risk in surgical patients, in predicting postoperative complications after lower extremity (LE) free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was conducted from 2010 to 2020 on patients who underwent LE free-flap reconstruction. 5-mFI scores were calculated and patients were categorized as 5-mFI ≥2 or <2. The primary endpoint was the presence of 30-day overall complications. The secondary endpoints included 30-day readmission, need for reoperation, and need to discharge to a care facility. Comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variances, Pearson's chi-squared test, or Fisher's extract test. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed for sex, age, BMI, smoker status, operative time, and ASA classification.

RESULTS

Total of 294 (61.6% males) patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed 5-mFI ≥2 had higher rates of overall complications (p = .043) and hematologic complications (p = .033). In this population, there were also higher rates of reoperation (p = .003) and discharge to care facility (p < .001). Multivariable regression models further substantiated that 5-mFI ≥2 was independently associated with increased overall complications [2.46, CI: 1.10-5.59, p = .031], hematologic complications [2.55, 1.02-6.35, p = .046], reoperation [4.55, 1.54-13.3, p = .006], and discharge to facility [2.86, 1.27-6.45, p = .011].

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong association of 5-mFI ≥2 with adverse post-operative outcomes in male patients undergoing LE free-flap reconstruction. This can be a valuable adjunct in the counsel of patients for whom lower extremity salvage is feasible.

Determining functional outcomes after resection and reconstruction of primary soft tissue sarcoma in the lower extremity: A review of current subjective and objective measurement systems

The surgical management of soft-tissue sarcoma has evolved significantly over the last two decades due to the routine use of adjunct therapies, with an increased focus on postoperative functional outcome. The literature suffers from methodological inconsistency and use of low quality outcome measures to assess an already heterogeneous population. This article aims to review the most frequently used subjective and objective methods of functional outcome assessment and highlight the current benefits and limitations of these.

Pedicled Functional Latissimus Flaps for Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity following Resection of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

(1) Background: Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the upper extremity can result in substantial functional impairment with limited options for functional reconstruction. Free functional latissimus flaps have been utilized to restore function of the thigh; however, there is limited data on the use of latissimus flaps for functional reconstruction in the upper extremity. As such, we sought to evaluate our institutional experience with these flaps. (2) Methods: We reviewed ten (seven male; three female; and a mean age of 63 years) patients undergoing soft-tissue sarcoma resection involving the triceps (n = 4), biceps (n = 4), and deltoid (n = 2) reconstructed with a pedicled functional latissimus flap. All surviving patients had at least 1 year of follow-up, with a mean follow-up of 5 years. (3) Results: The mean elbow range of motion and shoulder elevation were 105° and 150°. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 88%, and the muscle strength was four. Four patients had a recipient site wound complication. There were no flap losses. One patient sustained a radiation-associated humerus fracture 5 years postoperatively, treated nonoperatively. (4) Conclusions: Although early complications are high, pedicled functional latissimus flaps allow for wound coverage, potential space obliteration, and restoration of function in the upper extremity following resection of large soft tissue sarcomas.

How to measure success in lower extremity reconstruction, which outcome measurements do we use a systematic review and metanalysis

Different factors have to be considered and weighted in the treatment algorithm of lower extremity reconstruction. A combination of both clinicians' and patients' perspectives is necessary to provide a conclusive picture. Currently, there aren't any standardized and validated measurement data sets for lower extremity reconstructions. This makes it necessary to identify the relevant domains. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and metanalysis of outcome measurements and evaluated their ability to measure outcomes after lower extremity reconstruction. A systematic review and metanalysis according to the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' protocol were performed for studies reporting at least one structured outcome measurement of lower extremity reconstruction. Both Patient (PROMs)- and Clinician reported outcome measurements (CROMs)were analyzed. Of the 2827 identified articles, 102 were included in the final analysis. In total 86 outcome measurements were identified, 34 CROMs, 44 PROMs and 8 (9.3%) outcome measurements that have elements of both. Twenty-four measure functional outcome, 3 pain, 10 sensations and proprioception, 9 quality of life, 8 satisfaction with the result, 5 measure the aesthetic outcome, 6 contours and flap stability and 21 contain multidomain elements. A multitude of different outcome measurements is currently used in lower extremity reconstruction So far, no consensus has been reached on what to measure and how. Validation and standardization of both PROMs and CROMs in plastic surgery is needed to improve the outcome of our patients, better meet their needs and expectations and eventually optimize extremity reconstruction by enabling a direct comparison of studies' results.

Upper Extremity Free Flap Transfers: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Introduction  We evaluated the demographics, flap types, and 30-day complication, readmission, and reoperation rates for upper extremity free flap transfers within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Materials and Methods  Upper extremity free flap transfer patients in the NSQIP from 2008 to 2016 were identified. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions were queried. Chi-squared tests evaluated differences in sex, race, and insurance. The types of procedures performed, complication frequencies, reoperation rates, and readmission rates were analyzed. Results  One-hundred-eleven patients were selected (mean: 36.8 years). Most common upper extremity free flaps were muscle/myocutaneous (45.9%) and other vascularized bone grafts with microanastomosis (27.9%). Thirty-day complications among all patients included superficial site infections (2.7%), intraoperative transfusions (7.2%), pneumonia (0.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (0.9%). Thirty-day reoperation and readmission rates were 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. The mean time from discharge to readmission was 12.5 days. Conclusion  Upper extremity free flap transfers could be performed with a low rate of 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

Measuring functional outcome in upper extremity soft-tissue sarcoma: Validation of the Toronto extremity salvage score and the QuickDASH patient-reported outcome instruments

Interest in functional outcome (FO) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients has increased. The aim of this study was to validate two FO questionnaires for upper extremity STS patients: the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and short version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), based on Finnish population data. A multi-center study was conducted at two academic sarcoma centers. Surgically treated upper extremity STS patients were invited to participate. Patients completed the TESS and the QuickDASH with HRQL questionnaires the 15D and the QLQ-C30. The scores were analyzed and compared. Fifty-five patients with a mean follow-up period of 4.7 years were included. Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation [SD] 14.6). The mean score for TESS was 88.5 (SD 15.1) and for QuickDASH 17.8 (SD 19.6). The QuickDASH had a statistically significantly better score coverage. A ceiling effect was noted, 27% and 20% for TESS and QuickDASH, respectively. The TESS and QuickDASH scores were strongly correlated (r= -0.89). The TESS score strongly correlated with the QLQ-C30 (r = 0.79) and the 15D score (r = 0.70). The QuickDASH score correlated strongly with the QLQ-C30 score (r=-0.71) and moderately with the 15D score (r= -0.56). The TESS score had a statistically significantly stronger correlation with the 15D score than QuickDASH (p<0.005). Both the TESS and the QuickDASH provide reliable scores for assessing FO in upper extremity STS patients. The QuickDASH has a better coverage, whereas TESS showed a stronger correlation to HRQL scores.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: oncological and functional results after surgery

This retrospective study evaluates outcomes after treatment of upper-extremity soft tissue sarcoma in 44 patients. We re-resected 19 tumours that had been resected elsewhere without adequate preoperative planning, and we made 25 well-planned primary resections. Four patients in the unplanned group and five in the planned group eventually received amputations. Thirty-three patients were alive at a median follow-up time of 33 months (IQR 18 to 57). Tumour size > 7 cm, tumour Grade 3 and the presence of distant organ metastases were the main factors affecting the oncological outcomes. We found no statistical differences between the planning groups. Functional outcomes and quality of life were significantly worse after amputation or major nerve resections. We conclude with this sized sample that the lack of planning in itself did not influence the final results, but there were differences in tumour size, grade and localization between the groups that may play a role.Level of evidence: IV.

Soft-tissue reconstruction after soft-tissue sarcoma resection: the clinical outcomes of 24 patients

PURPOSE

Pedicle or free-flap reconstruction is important in surgical sarcoma management. Free flaps are indicated only when pedicle flaps are considered inadequate; however, they are associated with a higher risk of flap failure, longer surgical times, and technical difficulty. To determine the skin defect size that can be covered by a pedicle flap, we investigated the clinical outcomes and complications of reconstruction using pedicle flaps vs. free flaps after sarcoma resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the medical records of 24 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas who underwent reconstruction using a pedicle (n = 20) or free flap (n = 4) following wide tumour resection.

RESULTS

All skin defects of the knee, lower leg, and ankle were reconstructed using a pedicle flap. Skin defects of the knee, lower leg, and ankle were covered by up to 525 cm², 325 cm², and 234 cm², respectively. The amount of blood loss was significantly greater in the free-flap group than in the pedicle flap group (p = 0.011). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the pedicle flap group than in the free-flap group (p = 0.006). Total necrosis was observed in one (25%) patient in the free-flap group; no case of total necrosis was observed in the pedicle flap group.

CONCLUSION

Less blood loss, shorter surgical time, and lower risk of total flap necrosis are notable advantages of pedicle flaps over free flaps. Most skin defects, even large ones, of the lower extremities following sarcoma resection can be covered using a single pedicle flap or multiple pedicle flaps.

Patient's quality of life after surgery and radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma - a retrospective single-center study over ten years

Background and objectives

The purpose of this study is to analyze major complication rates and different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with or without radio (chemo) therapy and surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent Extremity STS excision from 2004 to 2014 (182 patients included). Patients’ data were collected from patients’ records. HRQoL was assessed by using EORTC QLQ-C30.

Results

A total of 182 patients underwent sarcoma resection. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT), the major-complication rate amounted to 28% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p <  0.001). Major-complication rates after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) occurred in 8% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p = 0.265). Comparison QoL scores between treating with neoadjuvant RCT or without RT revealed significant worse scores with neoadjuvant RCT. Further stratification of disease control of these patients showed significant reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT compared to irradiated disease-free patients.

Discussion

To date, there have only been a few investigations of QoL in STS. Retrospective study on quality of life have limitations, like a lack of baseline evaluation of QoL. Patient candidated to radiation therapy could have had worse QoL baseline due to more advanced disease. Disease status of the patients who answered the questionnaires could have been an influence of QoL and we could show reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT, but not for the patients with recurrence or metastasis, so it is very hard to discriminate whether radiation therapy could really have an impact or not.

Conclusion

This study might assist in further improving the understanding of QoL in STS patients and may animate for prospective studies examining the oncological therapies impact on HRQoL.

Variables associated with 30-day postoperative complications in lower extremity free flap reconstruction identified in the ACS-NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity free flaps are a common way to treat both traumatic and oncologic lower extremity wounds. These patients often suffer postoperative complications. We sought to use the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to identify variables associated with postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients who had free flap procedure and a primary diagnosis code for lower extremity pathology were identified in the NSQIP database from 2006 to 2017. NSQIP includes data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, including information up to 30 postoperative days. Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for free flaps and international classification of diseases (ICD) 9 and 10 codes for lower extremity pathology were used for our cohort. We examined overall and major complication rates. Major complications were defined as reoperation, readmission, organ space infection, or death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify associations with complications.

RESULTS

Four hundred and eighty-three patients underwent lower extremity free flaps. Overall complication rate was 31.6% and major complication rate was 14.9%. Prolonged operative time (OR = 2.81, CI:1.76-4.48, p < .001), preoperative steroid use (OR = 3.04, CI:1.12-8.29, p = .030), and preoperative anemia (OR = 4.10, CI:2.00-8.41, p < .001) were independently associated with any complication. Diabetes (OR = 2.56, CI:1.24-5.29, p = .011) and prolonged operative time (OR = 3.75, CI:2.17-6.47, p < .001) were independently associated with major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In lower extremity flap reconstruction, associations with overall complications include prolonged operative time, steroid use, and anemia. Associations with major complications included diabetes and prolonged operative time. These associations can be used to guide interventions on patients identified to have greater risk of complications.