Randomized controlled trial of a bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implant in the frontal sinus opening

The impact of middle meatal steroid-eluting implants on the postoperative outcomes of chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has become an established surgical option in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The goal of this review is to assess the impact of steroid-eluting middle meatal implants after ESS. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), SCOPUS, PUBMED, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR were searched from inception to November 2022. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients receiving ESS for CRS utilising a steroid-eluting middle meatal implants were eligible. The primary outcome was adhesion or synechiae. The secondary outcomes were mucosal inflammation, polyp reformation, the need for oral steroids and additional surgery, postoperative bleeding, sinus pain and discomfort, postoperative sinus-related infection, and change in intraocular pressure. Fourteen full articles were examined out of 496 potential abstracts. Seven RCTs satisfied the criteria. At 30days, steroid-eluting implants reduced adhesion (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.56; P<0.001), mucosal inflammation (MD: -13.09, 95% CI: -18.22 to -7.97; P<0.001), polyp reformation (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.44; P<0.001), and requirement of additional oral steroid (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.78; P=0.005) or surgery (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.50; P<0.001). While their use for adhesion (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.54; P<0.001) and polyp reformation (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.51; P<0.001) were favourable, there was no difference in mucosal inflammation (MD: -5.68, 95% CI: -12.39 to 1.03; P=0.100) or the need for surgery (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.07 to 12.37; P=0.980) when evaluated after 30days. Overall, the findings suggest that steroid-eluting middle meatal implants improve ESS outcomes by lowering rates of adhesion formation, postoperative medical and surgical interventions, recurrent polyposis, and inflammation, while having no significant negative impact in the immediate postoperative period. More research is needed into the long-term impacts.

Assessing the effect of absorbable steroid sinus implant: a state-of-the-art systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic sinus surgery is not a definitive treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The use of sinus stents after surgery to maintain sinus patency and deliver local steroids has gained popularity. The first steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implant (SEBI) approved for this indication, later Propel, was developed in 2011. This state-of-the-art review aims to summarize the available evidence, as well as to point out potential pitfalls and lack of specific analyses to guide future research on this new therapeutic option.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO.

REVIEW METHODS

Nine research questions were defined: Are steroid-eluting Sinus implants useful for the control of CRS symptoms after surgery? Do they improve surgical field healing after CRS surgery? Do they decrease polyp regrowth after ESS? Do they decrease the need for ESS? Are they useful in symptom control as in-office procedure? Are they better than other steroid-impregnated resorbable materials? Do they have a positive impact on olfaction? Are they safe? Are they cost-effective? Retrieved articles were reviewed by two authors.

RESULTS

Twenty nine studies were included: 3 metanalysis, 1 systematic review, 10 randomized clinical trials, 4 quasi-experimental studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, 4 cost studies, 3 case series and 2 expert consensus. The review encompassed a population of 3,012 patients treated with SEBI and 2826 controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first state-of-the-art review assessing steroid eluting bioabsorbable stent evidence. Despite the effort in recent years, still several questions remain unanswered. This review will hopefully guide future research efforts to better define the role of SEBI in the otolaryngology practice.

The placebo effect in randomized-controlled trials of medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The placebo effect observed in clinical trials evaluating medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to characterize the placebo effect present within CRS outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Nursing (CINAHL) was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medical treatments for CRS versus placebo were included. We assessed patient-reported (sino-nasal outcome test 22 [SNOT-22], nasal obstruction, sense of smell, nasal obstruction visual analogue score [VAS], sense of smell VAS, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) and objective (Lund-Mackay Computed tomography (CT) score, peak nasal inspiratory flow [PNIF], nasal polyp scores, 40-item Smell Identification Test, serum IgE, and blood eosinophil levels) outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs were included, comprising 1437 patients (mean age 49.2 years). Biologics were the most common treatment investigated (n = 9). Eleven studies administered background steroids along with placebo. Following placebo administration, multiple patient-reported outcomes significantly decreased, including SNOT-22 (mean difference -9.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-11.26, -7.73]), nasal obstruction (-0.33 [-0.54, -0.13]), sense of smell (-0.22 [-0.33, -0.11]), nasal obstruction VAS (-2.47 [-2.87, -2.06]), and loss of smell VAS (-2.31 [-4.14, -0.47]) scores. For objective measures, significant changes occurred in Lund-Mackay CT score (-0.82, [-1.48, -0.16]) and PNIF (4.70, [4.76, 24.64]) with placebo. Placebo arms had the greatest impact when no background medications were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Placebo treatments have a statistically and potentially clinically significant effect on patient-reported and some objective CRS outcomes. Further investigation is required to fully understand placebo effect, which could improve assessment of RCTs and impact patient care.

Outcomes of Frontal Sinus Stenting With Steroid Impregnated Microsponge Versus Steroid-Eluting Implant

BACKGROUND

Mometasone-eluting poly-L-lactide-coglycolide (MPLG) is available commercially for frontal sinus ostium (FSO) stenting. An alternative chitosan polymer-based drug delivery microsponge is also available at a lower cost per unit.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of MPLG stents versus triamcinolone-impregnated chitosan polymer (TICP) microsponge in frontal sinus surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery from December 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed to identify those with the intraoperative placement of TICP microsponge or MPLG stent in the FSO. FSO patency was evaluated by endoscopy at follow-up. Twenty-two-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was also recorded, and complications were noted.

RESULTS

A total of 68 subjects and 96 FSOs were treated. TICP was first used in August 2021 and MPLG in December 2018. MPLG placement in a Draf 3 cavity was excluded since TICP had not been used during Draf 3 procedure. Both cohorts (TICP 20 subjects, 35 FSOs; MPLG 26 subjects, 39 FSOs) had similar clinical characteristics. At a mean total follow-up of 249.2 days for TICP and 490.4 days for MPLG, FSO patency was 82.9% and 87.1%, respectively (P = .265). At an equivalent follow-up of 130.6 days in TICP and 154.0 days in MPLG, patency was 94.3% and 89.7%, respectively (P = .475). Both groups showed significant reductions in SNOT-22 (P < .001). MPLG demonstrated crusting within the FSO at 1 month (none in TICP).

CONCLUSION

FSO patency for both stents was similar, although TICP had significantly lower costs per unit. Additional comparative trials may be helpful for guiding clinicians on the appropriate clinical situations for the use of these devices.

Corticosteroid-eluting implants for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Topical corticosteroid therapies are the most popular prescribed medications for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). While topical corticosteroids effectively reduce the inflammatory burden associated with CRS, their distribution inside the nasal cavity is limited and primarily dependent on their delivery device. Corticosteroid-eluting implants serve as relatively novel technology, allowing targeted, sustained release of a high concentration of corticosteroids directly onto the sinus mucosa. Three types of corticosteroid-eluting implants can be characterized: 1. intraoperatively inserted corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, 2. postoperatively inserted, office-based corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, and 3. office-based corticosteroid-eluting implants for naïve paranasal sinuses.

AREAS COVERED

The review summarizes the different steroid-eluting sinus implants, their indications for use in CRS patients, and the existing evidence regarding their clinical efficacy. We also highlight potential areas for improvement and development.

EXPERT OPINION

Corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants highlight an evolving field that is constantly investigating and adding new treatment options to the market. Presently, corticosteroid-eluting implants for CRS are most commonly applied intraoperatively and postoperatively with endoscopic sinus surgery, providing significant improvements in mucosal healing and reducing the amount of surgical failures. Future development around corticosteroid-eluting implants should focus on strategies to reduce the amount of crusting around the implants.

Maximizing Postoperative Recovery: The Role of Functional Biomaterials as Nasal Packs-A Comprehensive Systematic Review without Meta-Analysis (SWiM)

Numerous biomaterials have been developed over the years to enhance the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. These products are specifically designed to prevent postoperative bleeding, optimize wound healing, and reduce inflammation. However, there is no singular material on the market that can be deemed the optimal material for the nasal pack. We systematically reviewed the available evidence to assess the functional biomaterial efficacy after ESS in prospective studies. The search was performed using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 31 articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to assess each study's risk of bias. The studies were critically analyzed and categorized into types of biomaterial and functional properties, according to synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Despite the heterogeneity between studies, it was observed that chitosan, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and starch-derived materials exhibit better endoscopic scores and significant potential for use in nasal packing. The published data support the idea that applying a nasal pack after ESS improves wound healing and patient-reported outcomes.

Advances in Sinus Surgery for Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is comprised of a diverse group of endotypes that cause significant morbidity for afflicted patients. While endoscopic sinus surgery helps ameliorate the disease, polyps frequently recur. Newer strategies are intended to provide access for topical steroid irrigations in attempts to improve the disease process and quality of life, and decrease overall recurrence of polyps.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature examining the latest surgical approaches for CRSwNP.

METHODS

Review article.

RESULTS

In dealing with the recalcitrant nature of CRSwNP, surgical techniques have simultaneously become more nuanced and aggressive. Bony resection in anatomically unfavorable areas such as the frontal, maxillary, and sphenoid outflow regions, replacing diseased or denuded mucosa with healthy grafts or flaps at the neo-ostia, and introducing drug-eluting biomaterials to newly opened sinus outflow tracts are highlights in the recent advancements in sinus surgery for CRSwNP. The Draf 3 or modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure has become a standard technique and demonstrated to improve quality of life and decrease polyp recurrence. A number of mucosal grafting or mucosal flap techniques have been described that cover exposed bone of the neo-ostium and evidence shows that this improves healing and diameter of the Draf 3. Partial middle turbinectomy, while controversial, appears to help decrease polyp recurrence in long-term follow-up studies. Modified endoscopic medial maxillectomy improves access to the maxillary sinus mucosa, facilitates debridement and, particularly, in the cystic fibrosis nasal polyp patient, improves overall management of the disease. Sphenoid drill-out procedure provides wider access for topical steroid irrigations and also may improve management of CRSwNP.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention remains a mainstay of therapy for CRSwNP. Newer techniques revolve around improving access for topical steroid therapy.

Use of intraoperative frontal sinus mometasone-eluting stents decreased interleukin 5 and interleukin 13 in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Mometasone-eluting stents (MES) have demonstrated improvement in short-term endoscopic outcomes and reduce short- to medium-term rescue interventions. Their effect on the local inflammatory environment, longer-term patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic severity have not been studied.

METHODS

Middle meatal mucus and validated measures of disease severity were collected before and 6 to 12 months after endoscopic surgery in 52 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs). Operative findings, type 2 mediator concentrations, intraoperative variables, and disease severity measures were compared between those who did and those who did not receive intraoperative frontal MES.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients with CRSwNPs were studied; 33 received frontal MES and were compared with 19 who did not. Pre-endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) middle meatus (MM) interleukin (IL) 13 and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were higher in the stented group (p < 0.05), but pre-ESS clinical measures of disease severity were similar as were surgical extent and post-ESS medical management. Intraoperative eosinophilic mucin was more frequent in the stented group (58% vs 11%, p = 0.001). IL-5 (p < 0.05) and IL-13 (p < 0.001) decreased post-ESS in the stented group, but this was not observed in the nonstented group. Post-ESS IL-4 and IL-13 were higher in the nonstented vs stented group (p < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSION

Although patients who received intraoperative frontal MES had significantly higher pre-ESS MM IL-13 and ECP, patients who received frontal MES had lower concentrations of IL-4 and IL-13 than those who did not at a median of 8 months post-ESS. However, these changes did not correspond to significantly different measures of symptomatic or radiographic disease severity.

Short-term postoperative efficacy of steroid-eluting stents for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ECRSwNP) is a refractory clinical phenotype with high symptom burden and relapse rate. Steroid-eluting stents are safe and effective for reducing polyp size, symptom burden, and the need for revision sinus surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of steroid-eluting stent implantation on the surgical outcomes of patients with ECRSwNP.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, intrapatient-controlled trial recruited patients aged 18 to 65 years with ECRSwNP requiring surgery. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled and randomly implanted with absorbable steroid-eluting stents containing mometasone furoate in one sinus at the end of surgery. All patients received standard postoperative care and follow-up. The primary outcome was the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score within 12 weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included nasal symptoms scores, nasal resistance, acoustic rhinometry, nasal nitric oxide levels, 3-dimensional volumetric computed tomography scores, and eosinophil counts in the ethmoid mucosa.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients completed the trial. At postoperative weeks 4, 8, and 12, the Lund-Kennedy scores were significantly lower on the treatment side than on the control side (all p<0.01). Compared with the treatment side, the control side exhibited higher tissue eosinophilia at week 4 and higher volumetric, nasal obstruction, and total nasal symptom scores at postoperative week 8 (p = 0.011, p = 0.011, p<0.01, and p = 0.001, respectively). No adrenal cortical suppression or serious side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Steroid-eluting stents reduce postoperative sinus mucosal edema and eosinophilic inflammation, with persistent effects after stent disintegration, and are a good supplementary post-surgical treatment in patients with ECRSwNP. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the curative effects and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery in children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

At present, the surgical treatment of sinusitis with nasal polyps has made great progress, but its recurrence rate is still high. Therefore, this time, meta-analysis is used to study the therapeutic effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps, analyze its effectiveness and safety, and provide theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

METHODS

Boolean logic searching was adopted to retrieve articles from various databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), published from the establishment of the database to December 30, 2021. The following search terms were used: "endoscopic sinus surgery", "antrochoanal polyps", "chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps", and "nasal polyps". Comparative studies on traditional surgical treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery were also screened out. Review Manager was utilized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 9 references were included in the study, and most of them were low risk bias (medium and high quality). Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical heterogeneity between the control group and the experimental group (Chi²=0.03, I²=0%, P=0.98). According to the fixed effect model analysis, the number of patients with polyp formation in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (Z=2.65, P=0.008). Compared with the control group, there is no statistical heterogeneity in the postoperative recurrence (Chi²=1.59, I²=0%, P=0.45). According to the analysis of fixed effect model, the postoperative recurrence in the experimental group is significantly less than that in the control group (Z=2.92, OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.40-5.52, P=0.004). Compared with the control group, the results of postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) were statistically different (Chi²=12.63, I²=84%, P=0.002). According to the random effect model analysis, the VAS score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (Z=18.06, MD =4.51, 95% CI: 3.96-5.05, P<0.00001).

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic sinus surgery could reduce the postoperative recurrence and pain of patients, and showed high curative effects and safety in the treatment of children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps.

Indications for Absorbable Steroid-Eluting Sinus Implants: Viewpoint via the Delphi Method

Absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants provide targeted corticosteroid release over a sustained period and are designed to prevent both undesirable adhesion formation and sinus ostia restenosis. Here, we highlight the key evidence of these implants to date and query a group of experts via a Delphi process on the indications and optimal timing for intraoperative or in-office placement of these implants. Six of a total of 12 statements reached consensus and were accepted. Overall, experts largely agree that intraoperative or in-office use of steroid-eluting stents could be considered for patients: (1) who are diabetic or intolerant of oral steroids, (2) undergoing extended frontal sinus surgery, and (3) with recurrent stenosis. Given the lack of expert consensus on other key statements, clinicians should carefully consider these treatment options on a case-by-case basis after shared decision-making.

Biocompatible Materials in Otorhinolaryngology and Their Antibacterial Properties

For decades, biomaterials have been commonly used in medicine for the replacement of human body tissue, precise drug-delivery systems, or as parts of medical devices that are essential for some treatment methods. Due to rapid progress in the field of new materials, updates on the state of knowledge about biomaterials are frequently needed. This article describes the clinical application of different types of biomaterials in the field of otorhinolaryngology, i.e., head and neck surgery, focusing on their antimicrobial properties. The variety of their applications includes cochlear implants, middle ear prostheses, voice prostheses, materials for osteosynthesis, and nasal packing after nasal/paranasal sinuses surgery. Ceramics, such as as hydroxyapatite, zirconia, or metals and metal alloys, still have applications in the head and neck region. Tissue engineering scaffolds and drug-eluting materials, such as polymers and polymer-based composites, are becoming more common. The restoration of life tissue and the ability to prevent microbial colonization should be taken into consideration when designing the materials to be used for implant production. The authors of this paper have reviewed publications available in PubMed from the last five years about the recent progress in this topic but also establish the state of knowledge of the most common application of biomaterials over the last few decades.

Bioabsorbable dressing impregnated with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin after endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

In addition to its hemostatic and stabilization role, biodegradable nasal packing can be used as a carrier for drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The aim of this study was to compare the influence of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) soaked with ciprofloxacin, or betamethasone, or both to the same foam soaked with saline after FESS.

METHODS

120 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis, with and without polyps, directed for bilateral full-house FESS were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomized and blinded into 3 groups, depending on the type of postoperative procedure applied. Thus, NasoPore soaked with antibiotic was provided to the first group; in the second group, the steroid was used; and the combination of both, in the third group. In each case, the aforementioned procedure was administered on one side of the nose, while NasoPore was soaked in saline on the other, at the end of the surgery, respectively. The patients were requested to complete a questionnaire during their postoperative visits at 2, 10, 30, 90, and 180 days, scoring the level of complaints on the VAS scale, separately for each side. The evaluation of the healing process was performed at each visit using rigid endoscopy and subsequently rated on numerical scales.

RESULTS

Decreased mucosal edema and secretion; reduced Lund-Kennedy score; and favorable influences on facial pressure, nasal blockage, and smell were most evidently seen in the group receiving the antibioticsteroid combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of biodegradable nasal packing with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin in sino-nasal surgery has positive effects not only on the healing process but also impacts patient's comfort. To optimize it, however, further research is needed.

Corticosteroid Use in Otolaryngology: Current Considerations During the COVID-19 Era

OBJECTIVE

To offer pragmatic, evidence-informed advice on administering corticosteroids in otolaryngology during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, considering therapeutic efficacy, potential adverse effects, susceptibility to COVID-19, and potential effects on efficacy of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and guideline databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Guideline search strategies, supplemented by database searches on sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), idiopathic facial nerve paralysis (Bell's palsy), sinonasal polyposis, laryngotracheal disorders, head and neck oncology, and pediatric otolaryngology, prioritizing systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and COVID-19-specific findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) reduce long-term morbidity in individuals with SSNHL and Bell's palsy, reduce acute laryngotracheal edema, and have benefit in perioperative management for some procedures. Topical or locally injected corticosteroids are preferable for most other otolaryngologic indications. SCSs have not shown long-term benefit for sinonasal disorders. SCSs are not a contraindication to vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted that these vaccines are safe for immunocompromised patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

SCS use for SSNHL, Bell's palsy, laryngotracheal edema, and perioperative care should follow prepandemic standards. Local or topical corticosteroids are preferable for most other otolaryngologic indications. Whether SCSs attenuate response to vaccination against COVID-19 or increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. Immunosuppression may lower vaccine efficacy, so immunocompromised patients should adhere to recommended infection control practices. COVID-19 vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson vaccines is safe for immunocompromised patients.

The development of the mucosal concept in chronic rhinosinusitis and its clinical implications

In the last 2 decades, an increasing understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in chronic rhinosinusitis opened an avenue from phenotyping to endotyping, from eosinophilic inflammation to type 2 immunity, and from the "ventilation and drainage" paradigm to the mucosal concept for therapeutic considerations. With the advent of type 2 endotyping and targeted biomarkers, precise endotype-driven therapeutic options are possible including biologics and adapted surgical approaches. We here aim to focus on the complexity and heterogeneity of the features of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) endotypes, especially for those with nasal polyps, including its history, latest developments, clinical associations and endotype-driven solutions. In order to better manage uncontrolled severe CRS in clinical practice, medical decisions based on a profound understanding of the pathology and immunology of this heterogeneous disease, aiding a precision-medicine based approach for patient's treatment are pivotal.

Biomedical Applications of Supramolecular Materials in the Controllable Delivery of Steroids

Glucocorticoids are a class of steroid hormones secreted from the adrenal glands. The strong anti-inflammatory effects make it be one of the most popular and versatile drugs available to treat chronic inflammatory diseases. Additionally, supramolecular materials have been widely exploited in drug delivery, due to their biocompatibility, tunability, and predictability. Thus, steroid-based supramolecular materials and the release of steroids have been applied in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. This mini-review summarized recent advances in supramolecular materials loaded with glucocorticoid drugs in terms of hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and π-π stackings. We also discussed and prospected the application of the glucocorticoid drugs-based supramolecular system on chronic rhinosinusitis, multifactorial inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal sinuses mucosal membranes. Overall, supramolecular materials can provide an alternative to traditional materials as a novel delivery platform in clinical practice.

Effects of implants with steroids after endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis affects approximately 5%-2% of the general population worldwide. Steroid implants after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have drawn considerable interest for their cost savings, but relevant guidelines indicate that evidence on this topic is of low quality with high heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of steroid implants after ESS by synthesizing relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of potential references from five biomedical databases. They further extracted relevant data from the included studies, including (a) mean, standard deviation, or standard error for Lund-Kennedy endoscopic (LKE) score and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score and (b) events and sample sizes of each group for further intervention. Data were pooled in a random-effects model, and results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and I² .

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (n = 853) were included and showed that the steroid implant group had lower LKE scores (WMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.75 to -0.62; I²  = 0%) and POSE scores (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.47 to -0.76; I²  = 48%) than the placebo implant group at postoperative week 2. Moreover, the reoperation rate in the steroid implant group was also lower than in the placebo implant group (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; I²  = 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in the postoperative oral steroid requirement between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, steroid implant decreases LKE and POSE among patients receiving ESS in the short term, but long-term effects remain unclear. Patient-based outcomes are worth further discussion in the future.

Current Perspective on Nasal Delivery Systems for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis is an upper respiratory disease during which topical drug treatment via the nasal cavity is the most actively utilized therapeutic strategy. In addition to steroids, antibiotics, and antifungal agents, which are widely used in clinical practice, research on novel topical agents to improve the bacterial biofilm or mucociliary clearance remains ongoing. Moreover, owing to the complex structure of the nasal cavity, the effects of nasal drug delivery vary depending on factors related to delivery fluid dynamics, including device, volume, and compounds. In this article, we review methods and compounds that have been applied to chronic rhinosinusitis management and introduce recent advances and future perspectives in nasal drug delivery for upper respiratory diseases.

Intraoperative Applications of Topical Corticosteroid Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of recent techniques and technologies for the application of topical corticosteroid therapy immediately following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

A comprehensive search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify publications between January 2000 and December 2019 detailing clinical trials that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative applications of topical corticosteroids for CRS.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles, all of which highlight a variety of corticosteroid-infused products, including Propel corticosteroid-eluting stents, NasoPore, Merocel, SinuBand, calcium alginate, and bioresorbable gel-type products, are included for review. Propel stents are the only devices that have achieved level 1A evidence in terms of efficacy and have data to support their safety. The remaining products have shown mixed results in terms of efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSION

A wide range of techniques and technologies have been introduced to enhance the topical delivery of corticosteroids into the neosinuses after ESS for CRS. Regarding efficacy, there is level 1A evidence to support the use of Propel stents. Most of the remaining strategies show some degree of efficacy. Direct comparisons across the different strategies are limited owing to the varied uses of delivery vectors, corticosteroid choices, and doses of corticosteroids. Propel stents and SinuBand have sufficient data to support systemic and ocular safety, whereas the remaining products have limited data to support their safety.

Comparison of Bioabsorbable Steroid-Eluting Sinus Stents Versus Nasopore After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents versus absorbable Nasopore packs after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

One hundred eighty-one patients with CRS who underwent ESS were randomly assigned to receive a steroid-eluting sinus stent in one ethmoid sinus cavity, whereas the contralateral control side received a Nasopore pack. Endoscopic evaluations were performed 14, 30, and 90 days after the ESS. Postoperative intervention, polyp formation, adhesions, and middle turbinate (MT) position were assessed as efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS

The stents were successfully deployed in all 181 sinuses. Thirty days after the ESS, the stents significantly reduced the need for surgical intervention compared to the Nasopore (P < .0001). The percentage of cases with polyp formation was significantly lower on the stent sides compared with the Nasopore sides (P < .0001) at 14, 30, and 90 days after ESS. The percentage of severe adhesion was significantly lower on the stents sides than on the Nasopore sides at postoperative day 90 (P = .0003), whereas they were not significantly lower at postoperative days 14 and 30. There were no significant differences between the stent sides and the Nasopore sides regarding the frequency of MT lateralization at all end points. No device-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated significant improvement in the early postoperative outcomes by reducing the need for postoperative surgical intervention and polyp formation using steroid-eluting stents when compared with absorbable Nasopore packs. The steroid-eluting sinus stents and the Nasopore packs were each effective in preserving the ethmoid sinus patency and in preventing MT lateralization. A further prospective cohort study with long-term postoperative outcomes is warranted.

Current and Future Treatments of Rhinitis and Sinusitis

Advances in understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of both rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis have resulted in new treatment options, especially for chronic rhinosinusitis. A review of relevant medical and surgical clinical studies shows that intranasal corticosteroids, antihistamines, and allergen immunotherapy continue to be the best treatments for chronic rhinitis. Dupilumab is the first biologic approved for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps. Omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab may have a future role in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Novel corticosteroid delivery devices such as an exhalation delivery system for fluticasone and bioabsorbable sinus implants provide enhanced and localized distribution of corticosteroids. Surgical management tailored to the underlying disease process improves clinical outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis. Advances in the understanding of the heterogeneous nature of rhinitis and rhinosinusitis have resulted in more precise treatments. Improving the understanding of different endotypes should provide better knowledge to determine appropriate current and new therapies to treat these diseases.

Topical therapies for management of chronic rhinosinusitis: steroid implants

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) causes severe symptoms that lead to poor quality of life. When optimal medical therapy does not improve CRS symptoms, then endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) can be used in patients with persistent symptoms and radiographic evidence of CRS to improve patients' symptoms and quality of life. Despite appropriate and complete sinus surgery, there can be issues after sinus surgery such as synechiae formation and recurrence of polyps in certain CRS patients that can decrease long-term outcomes. Corticosteroids are used to decrease postoperative scarring and edema as well as prevent recurrence of nasal polyp formation after sinus surgery. However, the use of oral or systemic steroid can lead to serious short-term and long-term complications. Therefore, a safer alternative would be the topical delivery of steroid via steroid-eluting sinus implants.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify clinical studies evaluating steroid-eluting implants. Two forms of steroid-eluting implants were identified, Propel family products and Sinuva. The research findings from clinical studies using various steroid-eluting sinus implants are reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

Four prospective randomized clinical studies were identified for the Propel family products. Two prospective randomized clinical studies were identified for Sinuva. The results from the clinical studies showed that the use of the various steroid-eluting sinus implants can improve postoperative results after ESS as well as treat the recurrence of nasal polyps after sinus surgery without the need for additional sinus surgery.

CONCLUSION

The novel steroid-eluting implants appear to be beneficial for CRS patients immediately post-operatively as well as for nasal polyps patients. Interestingly, these implants could be used as a substitute for the beneficial effect of systemic steroid use for CRS patients.

Efficacy of steroid-eluting stents in management of chronic rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery: updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been mounting evidence suggesting the efficacy of steroid-eluting stents (SES) for management of chronic rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This meta-analysis serves to evaluate the efficacy of SES in improving postoperative outcomes after ESS.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed of PubMed for articles published between 1985 and 2018. The outcome variables were reported at, on average, 30 days postintervention.

RESULTS

Seven of the 76 published studies, all of which were industry-sponsored, were included for a collective cohort of 444 SES and 444 control sinuses. In patients who received SES vs controls, collective odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative need for intervention, surgery, and oral steroid were 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.62; p < 0.001), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18-0.52; p < 0.001), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.40-0.84; p = 0.004), respectively. In addition, collective ORs for frontal sinus ostia (FSO) patency, moderate-to-severe adhesion/scarring, and increase in polyp score were 2.53 (95% CI, 1.61-3.97; p < 0.001), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13-0.59; p < 0.001), and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25-0.74; p = 0.002), respectively. Collective mean differences for FSO/ethmoid inflammation and FSO diameter were -10.86 mm (p < 0.001) and +1.34 mm (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Aggregate evidence suggests that SES can improve ESS outcomes by reducing rates of postoperative intervention and recurrent polyposis and inflammation, while promoting FSO patency. All included and analyzed studies were industry-sponsored and ruling-out publication bias was not possible. Future independent and nonsponsored studies to further evaluate SES's long-term efficacy are warranted.

Novel Application of Steroid Eluting Stent in Petrous Apex Cholesterol Granuloma

Objective  This study describes the safety and efficacy of mometasone furoate eluting stents in the management of petrous apex cholesterol granuloma approached through an endonasal endoscopic route and assesses the restenosis rate. Methods  Consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal marsupialization of a petrous apex cholesterol granuloma at a tertiary referral center who had a mometasone furoate eluting stent placed intraoperatively were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. Postoperative endoscopy was used to determine success of surgery and stenting. Results  Five patients were included in the study, three were primary cases and two patients had revision surgeries performed. The steroid eluting stent was placed successfully and safely in all patients with no dural or vascular injuries. The average follow-up duration was 10.6 months. There was no restenosis in three patients and one patient had an immediate restenosis that was debrided in clinic (revision case). This was patent at the 16 months follow-up. One patient also developed stenosis, 4 months after surgery due to sphenoid sinusitis. Conclusion  Mometasone furoate eluting stents are safe and effective in the primary management of petrous apex cholesterol granuloma. Further studies are needed to assess their efficacy in revision cases and for long term results.

Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents for patients with refractory frontal diseases undergoing a revision Draf 3 procedure: a case series

Background: Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents are safe and effective in maintaining the patency of the frontal sinus ostium. Aims/objectives: To assess the efficacy of steroid-eluting sinus stents in improving postoperative outcomes following revision and re-revision Draf 3 procedures in patients with frontal diseases. Material and methods: Patients with recalcitrant chronic frontal rhinosinusitis (FRS) and mucocele who underwent revision and re-revision Draf 3 procedures from 2015 to 2017 were included. Preoperative disease parameters, demographics, and endoscopic and radiographic images were recorded. Results: Seven patients undergoing the Draf 3 procedure for recalcitrant chronic FRS (43%) and mucocele after complete resection of benign tumours in the frontal sinus (57%) were followed up for a mean of 16.5 months. At the end of follow-up, seven (100%) patients were asymptomatic and all patients (100%) had patent neo-ostia. Conclusions and significance: The use of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents had no unanticipated consequences, and the drainage pathways of the frontal neo-ostium remained patent. Steroid-eluting sinus stents may decrease recurrence rates in revision cases where patients have extensive scarring or neo-osteogenesis of the operative field from prior Draf 2 or 3 procedures. Further follow-up of the current cases and studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Multiple bioabsorbable corticosteroid-eluting stent placement with associated skull base injury

Bioabsorbable corticosteroid-eluting sinus stents (BCES) are used to optimize healing after sinus surgery. We report a patient with BCES placed through a dural defect. A 70 year old underwent sinus surgery. Postoperatively, the patient developed mental status changes. The patient was taken to the operating room and eight BCES were identified, with one extending through the skull base. The stents were extracted and the defect was repaired. The patient recovered well. This is the first significant complication associated with BCES. Thorough review of preoperative imaging, understanding of skull base anatomy, and careful use of BCES are critical for safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1494-1496, 2019.

Bioabsorbable Steroid Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Recurrent Rathke's Cleft Cyst

Objectives  Bioabsorbable steroid eluting stents may prevent the stenosis of ostia after sinus surgery. We describe a technique utilizing this technology to prevent the reformation of Rathke's cleft cysts (RCC) after transnasal transsphenoidal surgical drainage. Design  This study is based on retrospective review. Setting  The research took place at Tertiary academic medical center. Participants  Patients who underwent endoscopic marsupialization of RCC with stent placement were participated in this study. Main Outcome Measures  Demographics, surgical history, outcomes, and complications were primary measures of this study. Results  Four patients underwent drainage of a recurrent RCC with subsequent stent placement. All patients consented to off-label use of the stent. The mean age of patients was 42 years old and the number of prior drainage procedures ranged from 1 to 3. The stent was placed directly into the opening of the cyst after drainage with no other tissue placed into the cyst cavity or opening. The stents are bioabsorbable and were not removed after surgery but were evaluated endoscopically at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. The patients have been followed for a mean of 14 months after surgery with no evidence of recurrence on endoscopic exam or imaging. No patient had cerebrospinal fluid leak during or after the operation or permanent endocrinopathy. Conclusion  The use of a bioabsorbable steroid eluting stent had no unanticipated consequences and all drainage pathways of all the RCCs remain patent. The use of this technology may decrease recurrence rates in revision or complex cases where patients have extensive scarring of the operative field from prior drainage procedures. Further follow-up of the current cases and study in a larger cohort are warranted.

Mometasone furoate sinus implant - a new targeted approach to treating recurrent nasal polyp disease

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a broad heterogeneous inflammatory disorder of the nose and paranasal sinuses, resulting from the dysfunctional interplay between host immunity, defective epithelial barrier, and environmental factors. CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is considered a more severe clinical phenotype with greater burden of symptoms and higher relapse rate, especially with comorbid asthma or aspirin sensitivity. Available treatment options after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) - systemic corticosteroids or revision surgery - have significant risks and limitations. Areas covered: Bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting implants have been studied extensively for the ability to dilate and re-establish sinus patency by the localized, controlled delivery of topical corticosteroids to diseased sinonasal lining and nasal polyps. This review provides a comprehensive, up to date analysis of the literature regarding a novel, office-based, mometasone furoate (MF) sinus implant that may treat patients with recurrent CRSwNP after ESS. Expert commentary: Clinical evidence has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of steroid-eluting implant in the reduction of polyp size, symptom burden, and the need for revision sinus surgery. MF sinus implants may play an important role in the management of patients with recurrent polyposis after sinus surgery.

Bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implants in the frontal sinus ostia: a pooled analysis

Background

Bioabsorbable steroid‐releasing implants (mometasone furoate, 370 μg) are effective for improving postsurgical outcomes in the frontal sinus ostia (FSO). In this study we evaluated the effect of these implants on frontal outcomes in various patient subgroups with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) using pooled data from 2 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

A total of 160 subjects were enrolled in 2 RCTs. After surgery, subjects were randomized to receive an implant in 1 FSO with the contralateral side as control. Data through day 90 from the 2 studies were pooled and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

At day 30, relative to controls, steroid‐releasing implants significantly reduced the need for postoperative interventions by 46.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], −60.7 to −27.9), for surgical interventions by 51.2% (95% CI, −68.2 to −25.2), and for oral steroid interventions by 37.2% (95% CI, −54.6 to −13.1) in the pooled data set. At day 90, statistically significant reductions (p < 0.05) in the need for postoperative interventions (relative reduction [RR], 30.2%), restenosis/occlusion rate (RR, 31.7%), and inflammation score (absolute difference, −6.0), and increase in estimated FSO diameter (absolute difference, 1 mm), favoring the treated side, were observed. Subgroup analyses of the pooled data showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) at day 90 in restenosis/occlusion rate, and estimated FSO diameter, favoring the treated side across subgroups, with no statistically significant subgroup‐by‐treatment interactions.

Conclusion

Bioabsorbable steroid‐releasing sinus implants improve outcomes of frontal sinus surgery through 90 days, irrespective of asthma status, previous endoscopic sinus surgery, extent of surgery, extent of polyps, or Lund‐Mackay computed tomography stage in the FSO.

Effects of mometasone furoate-impregnated biodegradable nasal dressing on endoscopic appearance in healing process following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative care is an important factor affecting the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The aim of this study was to test the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)-soaked biodegradable nasal dressings (BNDs) on endoscopic appearance in CRS patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) after ESS.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 64 CRSwNP patients with bilateral ESS were enrolled and randomly given 4 mL or 8 mL of MF-soaked BNDs (NasoPore) in 1 nasal cavity and the same amount of normal saline-soaked BNDs in the contralateral side. The BNDs were removed on the 7th or 14th postoperative day. Perioperative sinus endoscopy (POSE) and Lund-Kennedy scores were collected, on the 7th or 14th postoperative days and at 1, 2, and 3 postoperative months.

RESULTS

The POSE and Lund-Kennedy scores showed that in the 4-mL, 1-week group, no significant differences between the sides treated with MF-soaked BNDs and the normal saline-soaked control were observed at any postoperative visits. In the 4-mL, 2-week group, significant differences were found at the 2-week and 1-month postoperative visits but not at the 2-month and 3-month visits. In the 8-mL, 1-week group, significant differences were found at the 1-week, 1-month, and 2-month postoperative visits but not at the 3-month visit. In the 8-mL, 2-week group, significant differences were found at all postoperative visits.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that MF-impregnated BNDs improve the endoscopic appearance in the healing process of CRSwNP after ESS.

Safety and Effectiveness of a Bioabsorbable Steroid-Releasing Implant for the Paranasal Sinus Ostia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Suboptimal outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are often associated with restenosis and inflammation of frontal sinus ostia. Steroid-releasing sinus implants have been shown to maintain sinus patency by minimizing inflammation and scar tissue formation. An hourglass-shaped, bioabsorbable, steroid-releasing implant was developed to provide mechanical support and optimize drug delivery to paranasal sinus ostia.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of the hourglass-shaped, bioabsorbable, steroid-releasing sinus implant in improving postoperative outcomes when placed in the frontal sinus ostia (FSO) following ESS in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Design, Setting, and Participants

In a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial using an intrapatient control design (ESS followed by implant placement within 1 FSO vs ESS alone on the contralateral side) 80 adult patients, with a mean (SD) age of 49.5 (13.4) years and consisting of 53 (66%) men and 27 (34%) women, were enrolled and underwent bilateral frontal sinusotomies with 1 frontal sinus randomized to receive a steroid-releasing implant. The study was carried out in 12 US centers between July 2015 and March 2016.

Interventions

A bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implant with hourglass shape containing 370 µg of mometasone furoate. All patients received standardized postoperative care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The need for postoperative interventions, medical and surgical, in the FSO at day 30, as determined based on review of video endoscopic findings by an independent blinded surgeon. Also, endoscopic grading by the independent reviewer and clinical investigators at day 30 and day 90 and computed tomographic scan at day 90.

Results

The mean (SD) age of patients was 49.5 (13.4) years, 53 (66%) were men. Implants were successfully placed in all 80 randomized treatment sinuses. At day 30, steroid-releasing implants significantly reduced the need for postoperative interventions to 11.5% compared with 32.8% by surgery alone (mean difference, -21.3%; 95% CI, -35.1% to -7.6%), as assessed by the independent reviewer. Real-time endoscopic assessment by clinical investigators at day 30 demonstrated significant reduction in need for postoperative intervention (mean difference, -17.3%; 95% CI, -27.9% to -6.7%), significant reduction in inflammation score (mean difference, -12.3 mm; 95% CI, -18.3 to -6.4 mm), and significant reduction in rate of frontal restenosis or occlusion (mean difference, -22.7%; 95% CI, -33.5% to -11.9%) on treated compared with control sides. The results favoring the treatment sides were sustained through day 90: reduced need for postoperative interventions (mean difference, -11.7%; 95% CI, -21.0% to -2.4%) and reduction in restenosis and/or occlusion of the frontal ostium (mean difference, -17.4%; 95% CI, -28.6% to -6.1%). No implant-related adverse events were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

The hourglass-shaped steroid-releasing sinus implant was safe and more effective in maintaining FSO patency and improving surgical outcomes compared with surgery alone in the setting where no other immediate postoperative corticosteroids were administered.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02266810.

Randomized controlled trial of steroid-soaked absorbable calcium alginate nasal packing following endoscopic sinus surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the potential efficacy of steroid-soaked, absorbable calcium alginate nasal packing following endoscopic sinus surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (44 nostrils) who had chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps underwent bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery. Only those with an intersinus difference in Lund-Mackay severity score of 1 or less were included. In each patient, one randomly selected nostril was packed with calcium alginate soaked with 2 mL of triamcinolone (40 mg/mL) (triamcinolone group), whereas the contralateral nostril received an identical packing soaked in 2 mL of normal saline (saline group). Two independent investigators blinded to the packing allocation scored the surgical field using the validated Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scores 1, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

All 44 nostrils were analyzed; the Lund-Mackay scores did not differ significantly between the groups before surgery. Eight weeks after surgery, the total POSE scores were significantly lower in the triamcinolone group (P = .014). The POSE scoring parameters were then compared between groups, and the following variables were significantly different: middle turbinate synechiae with the lateral wall (P = .037), polypoid degeneration of the ethmoid cavity (P = .006), and sphenoid sinus severity (P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that steroid-soaked, absorbable nasal packing can be used to enhance wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery and to prevent polypoid changes in the nasal mucosa.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b. Laryngoscope, 128:311-316, 2018.

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Since first described in the 1990s, the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) has been the subject of a growing body of literature. We performed a review to compare indications and outcomes of EMLP in an early cohort of publications (1990-2008) versus a contemporary cohort (2009-2016) and compare outcomes associated with follow-up ≥2 years versus <2 years.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

An English-language search of the PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify publications from 1990 to 2016 reporting clinical outcomes of EMLP. Meta-analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System 9.4.

RESULTS

A total of 1,205 patients were abstracted from 29 articles with a mean follow-up of 29.1 ± 10.3 months. The overall rate of significant or complete symptom improvement was 86.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.2%-88.7%). The overall patency rate was 90.7% (95% CI: 89.1%-92.3%), with a revision rate of 12.6% (95% CI: 10.6%-14.3%). Compared to the early cohort, patients in the contemporary cohort underwent EMLP more often for tumors (P < .001), had higher rates of complete or significant symptom improvement (90.0% vs. 82.6 %, P < .001); and trended toward greater patency rates (92.1% vs. 88.6%, P = .052). Compared to the short-term follow-up cohort, the long-term cohort showed no differences in symptom improvement or patency, but the revision rate was higher (14.5% vs. 9.2%, P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

In the last decade, EMLP has been performed more frequently for tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated improved symptom outcomes and a trend toward improved patency rates. The revision rate increased significantly when follow-up exceeded 2 years. Laryngoscope, 128:317-326, 2018.

Evaluation of a steroid releasing sinus implant for the treatment of patients undergoing frontal sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

INTRODUCTION

Management of the frontal sinus places great demands on the otolaryngologist. Given that the fronto-ethmoidal region is susceptible to recurrent inflammation, scarring, and stenosis, maintaining long-term patency of the frontal sinus is a difficult challenge. Oral and topical anti-inflammatory therapy, post-operative stenting, and 'home-brew' drug elution have been used for the treatment of the frontal sinus with mixed success. Recently an implant has been approved for post-operative placement into the frontal recess. This implant provides reliable and consistent steroid drug elution to address inflammation of the frontal recess secondary to chronic sinusitis. Areas covered: This review discusses the development and application of steroid eluting implants in the postoperative care of patients with chronic frontal sinusitis. All randomized controlled trials evaluating steroid eluting implants are discussed. Relevant supporting material discussing background, economics, safety are included. Expert commentary: Steroid eluting implants fulfill a unique niche in the treatment following frontal sinus surgery. They are shown to decrease the need for post-operative interventions and improve outcomes in patients with chronic sinusitis. There is significant potential for growth in the use of steroid eluting implants.

Evaluation of the PROPEL® mini sinus implant for the treatment of frontal sinus disease

INTRODUCTION

Propel and Propel Mini sinus implants are mometasone furoate-coated bioabsorbable stents used as an adjunct in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery. The original sinus implant was deployed in the ethmoid sinuses to provide medialization of the middle turbinate, decrease scarring and mucosal adhesions, limit polyp regrowth, and reduce mucosal inflammation. A structurally smaller version of the Propel, the Propel Mini, was developed and now has been approved for endoscopic placement in the frontal sinuses. Areas covered: This evaluation will focus on the technical details of the Propel mini, previous studies documenting Propel's success in the ethmoid sinuses, and the safety and efficacy of the Propel mini implants in frontal sinus surgery. Expert opinion: Devices such as the Propel and Propel Mini stents are the beginning of a trend towards medication-coated bioabsorbable implants that can be used for sinonasal disease to minimize complications or possible side effects of surgical treatment by an increase of topical drug delivery locally.