Basic mechanism of button battery ingestion injuries and novel mitigation strategies after diagnosis and removal

Nasal Disorders

Nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and epistaxis are common presenting concerns in primary care clinics. Nasal disorders affect the quality of life for many children and families. Rarely, these complaints may represent a life-threatening condition among infant obligate nasal breathers or cases of unusual pathology. The most common causes of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction vary by age and include physiologic, infectious, allergic, foreign body, irritant, and traumatic causes. Less commonly, children may have congenital malformations, sinonasal masses, or autoimmune disease. The most common causes of epistaxis are inflammatory, environmental, and traumatic causes and medication misuse, but rarely, children may have predisposing anatomic, hematologic, or vascular abnormalities or even sinonasal tumors. In this article, we provide a thorough review of the common nasal disorders treated every day in primary care clinics and mention briefly some of the rare but serious cases that may be overlooked without considering a full differential diagnosis.

Public knowledge of button battery ingestions: A social media based cross-sectional analysis

INTRODUCTION

Button battery (BB) ingestion injuries are a devastating and preventable event within the pediatric population. Efforts to reduce the prevalence of esophageal button battery ingestion injuries include primary preventative measures. It is integral to assess the public's baseline knowledge about BB injuries to tailor future primary prevention efforts.

METHODS

This is a crowdsourcing survey-based study. Participants were notified through our institution's Twitter and Instagram accounts.

RESULTS

There were 930 completed survey responses from May to June 2022. The survey found that 87% (791/910) knew that swallowing a BB could cause injury and 71% knew that it could cause death (642/905). Eight-five percent of respondents did not know what signs and symptoms to look for after BB ingestion, only 30% (99/340) of healthcare professionals felt they would know. Only 10.1% (94/930) of participants knew to give children over 12 months old honey after suspected BB ingestion. Thirty-four percent (311/930) knew that complications could still occur even after BB were removed. Seventy-seven percent (719/930) knew that a dead BB could cause injury but only 17% knew the correct way to dispose of a dead button battery (158/930). Only 8% (72/930) of participants were knew that wrapping dead BB in tape could potentially prevent injury.

CONCLUSION

The current study reveals gaps in the public's understanding of BB injury including: the presentation of BB injuries; the delayed harm of BB impactions; management and mitigation strategies, and BB disposal methods. This survey provided imperative insights to help guide future education and primary prevention initiatives.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Home Therapies to Neutralize Button Battery Injury in a Porcine Esophageal Model

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Button battery ingestion can cause alkaline esophageal injury. There is interest in first-aid household products to neutralize the injury. The objective was to investigate which household products are effective at reducing button battery injury.

METHODS

Two cadaveric porcine experiments were performed. Experiment 1 utilized esophageal mucosal segments. A button battery (3VCR2032) was placed onto the mucosa, and substances (saline control, honey, jam, orange juice, yogurt, milk, and cola) were applied every 10 minutes for 6 applications. Tissue pH was measured every 10 minutes, and macroscopic ulceration size was assessed at 120 minutes. Experiment 2 used an intact esophageal model with a battery inserted into the lumen and jam, honey, and saline irrigation as per experiment 1. Tissue pH, macroscopic and histopathology changes were evaluated at 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, only honey and jam had a lower mean tissue pH at 120 minutes (8.0 [standard deviation [SD] 0.9, n=12] and 7.1 [SD 1.7, n=12], respectively) compared to saline solution 11.9 (SD 0.6, n=6, P<.0001). Both honey (0.24 cm2, SD 0.17) and jam (0.37 cm2, SD 0.40) had smaller mean areas of ulceration compared to saline solution (3.90 cm2, SD 1.03, P<.0001). In experiment 2, honey and jam had significantly lower mean tissue pH at all timepoints compared to saline solution. Histologic changes were evident at 60 minutes in the saline group, whereas honey and jam exhibited no or minimal changes until 120 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Honey and jam were able to neutralize injury caused by a button battery resulting in a smaller area of ulceration. Jam should be further explored as a possible first-aid option as an alternative to honey in suspected button battery ingestion prior to definitive management.

Day to Day Advocacy by Pediatric Health Care Providers

This manuscript highlights the impressive advocacy work that members of the American Academy of Pediatrics have achieved and serves to inspire pediatric health care providers of all specialties to pursue such efforts beyond the acute physical need of the child. This article represents one of the Symposia presented at the 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery.

Animal study: Basic mechanism of vocal cord paralysis caused by button battery ingestion in children

PURPOSE

Vocal cord paralysis has been reported as a common complication of button battery (BB) ingestion, and there is a need to confirm the mechanism of vocal cord paralysis for the development of a standardized treatment.

METHODS

A new CR2032 BB and artificial saliva were placed in a fresh pig esophagus with the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN); the negative electrode faced the nerve in the experimental group, while the positive electrode faced the nerve in the control group. The pH values of the intra- and extraesophageal walls were measured simultaneously. Pathological examination was performed after the esophagus and nerves were damaged.

RESULTS

After BB ingestion, the pH near the intraesophageal negative electrode increased rapidly, reaching 11.5 at 30 min and over 14 at 6 h, while the extraesophageal pH did not change at 1 h and began to accelerate after 2 h, reaching 10 at 6 h. After 6 h of exposure, the pathological section showed that the structure of the mucosa, submucosa, and muscle layer were destroyed; chromatin in the nucleus faded, and part of the nerve bundle in the adventitia had liquefaction necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The basic mechanism of vocal cord paralysis caused by BB ingestion is that the OH- generated by the electrolytic reaction of the negative electrode penetrates the esophageal wall and corrodes the RLN, which may be the cause of vocal cord paralysis caused by BB ingestion without esophageal perforation.

Can We Do Anything Else before Removing a Button Battery from the Esophagus?-Hyaluronic Acid

OBJECTIVE

 This article tests the protective effect of a commercially available mixture of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 on the damage caused by the exposure of esophageal mucosa to button batteries in an animal model.

METHODS

 Experimental study. Sixty porcine esophageal samples were distributed in three groups: control (CG), exposure (EG), and exposure-protection (EPG). In EG and EPG, one CR2032 button battery per sample was inserted, both were subdivided into 2-, 4-, 6-, and 24-hour exposure subgroups, with subsequent battery removal. EPG samples were irrigated with the solution 1 hour after battery exposure. Esophageal pH and final voltage of the battery were measured.

RESULTS

 pH in CG remained stable. No significant differences in pH at 1 hour were found between EG and EPG. In EPG, the pH of the mucosa exposed to the anode was lower than in GE at 2 hours (12.44 vs. 11.89, p = 0.203) and 4 hours (13.78 vs. 11.77, p < 0.0001). In the cathode pH was significantly higher in EG at 2 hours (2.5 vs. 4.11, p < 0.0001), 4 hours (2.33 vs. 4.78, p < 0.0001), and 6 hours (2.17 vs. 2.91, p < 0.0001). Significant voltage reduction at 1 hour was found in EG compared to EPG (0.48 vs. 1.08 V, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

 Exposure to hyaluronic acid solution buffers the acidification on the side exposed to the cathode and basification on the anode. This effect can be maintained up to 3 to 5 hours, even after stopping its application. Our results suggest that a solution containing hyaluronic acid could be used as an esophageal protector after accidental ingestion of button batteries.

Anatomic Considerations of esophageal button battery ingestion for outcomes and imaging

INTRODUCTION

Button batteries (BB) are a source of significant morbidity and mortality in young children. Little data is available regarding associations between esophageal impaction location and outcomes or need for surveillance imaging.

METHODS

All patients treated at a single institution following BB ingestion between 2018 and 2022 were included for retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated at our institution BBs were located, or most significant damage observed, in the cervical esophagus (n = 10, 50 %), followed by thoracic esophagus (n = 6, 30 %), and abdominal esophagus (n = 4, 20 %). Patients with cervical esophageal impaction were younger (482 [370-866] days), than those with thoracic (1395 [871-2369] days) or abdominal esophageal impaction (2021.5 [1230.5-3419.5] days) (p = 0.003). Zargar Mucosal Injury Grade was significantly more severe in patients with cervical button battery impaction; 8/10 (80 %) had a ≥Grade IIIB injury, compared to 2/6 (33.3 %) thoracic impactions and 0/4 (0 %) abdominal impactions (p = 0.002). All patients who developed persistent esophageal stenosis (n = 6) had cervical battery impactions (6, 60 %, p = 0.015). Both TEFs (2/2) had anterior facing anode, while both (2/2) esophageal perforations had posterior. Only 1/20 (5 %) patients, and 1/7 (14.3 %) with serious complications, had a serious complication detected on routine, rather than clinically indicated follow-up surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, cervical BB impaction occurred more frequently in younger children, was associated with more severe mucosal injury, and had higher risk of stenosis. Nearly all complications were detected on clinically indicated rather than postoperative surveillance imaging.

Pre-hospital triage of children at risk of oesophageal button battery impaction: the button battery impaction score

INTRODUCTION

Button battery ingestion in children can be fatal if oesophageal perforation occurs. Such children require chest radiography in the emergency department to determine the button battery position and number. Current guidelines recommend that a button battery impacted in the oesophagus should be removed within two hours. We developed a clinical tool (the button battery impaction score) to estimate the risk of oesophageal impaction and help determine the most appropriate healthcare facility for initial assessment, either a local medical centre or a medical centre with the infrastructure for endoscopic retrieval.

METHODS

A multi-centre retrospective study was conducted over seven years in eight French poison centres. We included patients aged less than 12 years with radiography showing the button battery position and a symptom description before radiography. Button battery impaction scores were calculated using backward stepwise selection.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 1,430 patients were included, of whom 86, 461, and 375 had a button battery in their oesophagus, stomach, and post-pyloric position, respectively. No button batteries were identified by radiography in 508 patients. Sixteen of thirty-five factors independently predicted oesophageal impaction before chest radiography (P < 0.05). After the backward stepwise selection, the following seven factors contributed to the button battery impaction score: cough, drooling, dysphagia/food refusal, fever, pain (unspecified location), vomiting, and button battery ≥ 15 mm. The button battery impaction score showed an area under the curve value of 0.87, a negative predictive value of 0.98, and a sensitivity of 0.86. No cases of death, stricture, or haemorrhage were observed in patients with negative scores, including those with oesophageal impaction.

CONCLUSIONS

A button battery impaction score used readily available data to predict the risk of oesophageal impaction after button battery ingestion and before chest radiography. When further validated, this rapid tool may be widely applicable in determining an appropriate facility for patient transfer to either a local medical centre or a medical centre with the infrastructure for endoscopic retrieval.

The use of honey in button battery ingestions: a systematic review

Background

Button battery (BB) ingestions may cause severe and possibly fatal complications, especially if the battery is located in the esophagus. The application of oral honey has recently been proposed by the National Capital Poison Center in the USA and in an ESPGHAN position paper in Europe, but clinical trials and experimental studies are limited. The goal of this systematic review was to analyze the evidence for this approach.

Materials and methods

A systematic review of clinical trials and experimental studies on the oral application of honey after BB ingestion in children was performed. Inclusion criteria according to the PICO format were patient age 0-18 years, ingestion of BB, oral administration of honey or other substances, all in vivo and in vitro studies, as well as reported complication rate, esophageal injury, and mortality. A manual search in the databases MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane was performed to identify relevant search terms to form the following queries and to construct the extensive search. Furthermore, the search was extended by using snowballing on the reports reference lists. The review is registered at Research Registry. The identifying number is reviewregistry1581.

Results

We found four publications that investigated the effects of honey after button battery ingestion. Three of these presented experimental in vitro and in vivo results and one reported a clinical retrospective study of 8 patients.

Conclusion

Follow up studies are required to further elucidate the effectiveness of the treatment with honey. The time intervals in which the use of honey is effective is not clear. Furthermore, a physiological model is needed for in vitro testing, preferably mimicking peristalsis and dynamic flow of the applied substances. However, since it is easy to apply and of minimal risk in patients over one year of age, honey should be considered a possible treatment option during the interval between presentation and endoscopic removal of the retained BB.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/643e9df96750410027ee11b0/, identifier: reviewregistry1581.

Wound pH and temperature as predictors of healing: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to measure wound pH, wound temperature and wound size together to gain further understanding of their impact as predictors of wound healing outcomes.

METHOD

This study employed a quantitative non-comparative, prospective, descriptive observational design. Participants with both acute and hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds were observed weekly for four weeks. Wound pH was measured using pH indicator strips, wound temperature was measured using an infrared camera and wound size was measured using the ruler method.

RESULTS

Most of the 97 participants (65%, n=63) were male; participant's ages ranged between 18 and 77 years (mean: 42±17.10. Most of the wounds observed were surgical 60%, (n=58) and 72% (n=70) of the wounds were classified as acute, with 28% (n=27) classified as hard-to-heal wounds. At baseline, there was no significant difference in pH between acute and hard-to-heal wounds; overall the mean pH was 8.34±0.32, mean temperature was 32.86±1.78°C) and mean wound area was 910.50±1132.30mm2. In week 4, mean pH was 7.71±1.11, mean temperature was 31.90±1.76°C and mean wound area was 339.90±511.70mm2. Over the study follow-up period, wound pH ranged from 5-9, from week 1 to week 4, mean pH reduced by 0.63 units from 8.34 to 7.71. Furthermore, there was a mean 3% reduction in wound temperature and a mean 62% reduction in wound size.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that a reduction in pH and temperature was associated with increased wound healing as evidenced by a corresponding reduction in wound size. Thus, measuring pH and temperature in clinical practice may provide clinically meaningful data pertaining to wound status.

Single-Center Retrospective Review of the Presentation and Initial Care of Esophageal Button Battery Impactions 2007-2020

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to characterize the patient population and initial presentation and care of esophageal button battery ingestion and provide descriptive data including factors affecting accurate diagnosis, duration of battery exposure, and battery removal.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from 2007 to 2020 at a single-center, large-volume, urban academic pediatric hospital system. Included participants were children 6 months to 18 years old who underwent removal of an esophageal button battery impaction at our institution.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 63 patients; ages ranged from 7 to 87 months with a median of 27 months. Median button battery size was 2.12 cm with 59% lodged in the proximal esophagus. A prolonged impaction, greater than 12 hours, occurred in 46% of patients. Risk ratio analysis demonstrated that lack of caregiver suspicion of ingestion was associated with prolonged impaction (risk ratio, 3.39; confidence interval, 2.15-5.34). Misdiagnosis of button battery ingestion occurred in 10% of cases. The majority of patients, 87%, required transfer from a referring facility with a median total distance of 37 miles (range, 1.4-160 miles) from home to facility where battery was removed.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study describes the initial presentation and care of a large cohort of pediatric esophageal button battery ingestion. It emphasizes the continued need for primary prevention, prompt identification, and removal of these batteries. There are many challenges in caring for these patients involving multiple pediatric disciplines, and guidelines encompassing a multidisciplinary approach would be beneficial.

Histopathologic Findings of Button Battery-Related Changes in a Perforated Meckel's Diverticulum: Report of Three Cases

Background: A button battery can cause perforation of Meckel's diverticulum if sequestered in this blind ending bowel segment. Reported cases focused on clinical manifestations, management options, radiologic and intraoperative findings. We highlight the histopathologic features in perforated Meckel's diverticula due to ingested button batteries. Case report: Three toddlers presented with perforated Meckel's diverticula after button battery ingestion. Histologic examination of the diverticula showed multiple burn-like mucosal ulcerations and liquefactive wall perforations of the tips, associated with prominent siderotic pigment deposits and calcifications. There were various residual materials with variable staining patterns in the luminal debris, necrotic tissue and adjacent to submucosal blood vessels. Conclusion: There is accelerated deposition of iron and calcium associated with button batteries.

Effectiveness of sucralfate in preventing esophageal stricture in children after ingestion of caustic agents

Ingestion of caustic agents by children is a serious health issue that can affect the patient for the rest of his life. The role of sucralfate in preventing stricture caused by caustic agents is controversial, and limited studies have been conducted in this field. We aimed to investigate the effect of sucralfate on preventing esophageal stricture in children. Sixty children with mean age of 36.69 ± 20.50 months and grade II B esophageal burns due to ingestion of caustic agents were enrolled in the study. In the intervention group, in addition to the usual treatment, sucralfate was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/kg every 2 h for 3 days. For the control group, only the usual treatment was prescribed. Stricture development was compared between groups based on endoscopic and radiologic findings. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 53 were examined. The incidence of esophageal stricture in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group (37% versus 67%, P-value = 0.042). In addition, the odds of esophageal stricture after sucralfate intervention was significantly reduced after adjustment for potential confounders (OR = 0.198, P-value = 0.031).  Conclusions: The results of this study showed that sucralfate may reduce the development of esophageal stricture in children when used to manage IIB esophageal burns due to ingestion of caustic agents. What is Known: • Ingestion of caustic agents by children is a serious health issue that can affect the patient for the rest of his life. • The role of sucralfate in preventing stricture caused by caustic agents is controversial and limited studies have been conducted in this field. What is New: • It seems that sucralfate significantly reduces the incidence of esophageal stricture following the ingestion of caustic agents in children compared to the control group. • We believe that the prognosis may be improved and the risk of stricture formation may be reduced with high doses of sucralfate therapy in grade IIB esophageal injury.

Button Battery Ingestions cause the Majority of Severe Complications

BACKGROUND

Foreign body ingestion in children is a clinically important reason for presentation to the emergency department. The individual outcome ranges from benign spontaneous courses to severe complications. Fatal outcomes occur rarely and complications are related to patient's age as well as type and location of the foreign body. The aim of our present study was to evaluate the outcome of children and adolescents with foreign body ingestion with a focus on complications, which mainly occurred after button battery ingestion.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients between 0 and 18 years of age who had presented to the paediatric emergency department of our hospital with suspected foreign body ingestion between January 2011 and March 2021 (123 months). Clinical, imaging, and endoscopic data as well as treatment modalities were analysed.

RESULTS

In the ten10 year period under review, a total of 1,162 children and adolescents (6 months - 18 years) presented to our emergency room with suspected foreign body ingestion. Among those, 398 ingestions (34%) could be verified radiologically and/or endoscopically, while in the remaining 764 cases (66%) the suspicion could not be confirmed. The majority of patients with verified ingestion (n=324; 81%) presented with ingestion of a metallic foreign body. We observed 55 cases with verified ingestion of a button battery. Five of these cases had severe complications, with a near-fatal course in two patients who developed an oesophageal-tracheal fistula.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to all other ingestions of foreign bodies in children, button battery ingestions lead to mucosal damage and severe complications in a significant number of children.

Button Battery Ingestion in Children (PilBouTox®): A Prospective Study Describing the Clinical Course and Identifying Factors Related to Esophageal Impaction or Severe Cases

In this study, we aimed to identify the factors related to esophageal impaction following button battery (BB) ingestion in children. PilBouTox, a prospective multicentric observational cohort study, was conducted from French Poison Control Centers between June 1, 2016 and May 31, 2018. Children (0-12 years old) with BB ingestion were included. After ingestion, patients were monitored for 21 days or more if they remained symptomatic (maximum 1 year). Causes of ingestion, clinical manifestations, medical management, and the outcomes were recorded. In total, 415 patients were included; among them, 35 had esophageal impaction and 14 had severe complications or died. Seven symptoms were closely related (relative risk (RR) > 30) to esophageal impaction: anorexia, drooling, dyspnea, fever, hemodynamic instability, pallor, and pain. Furthermore, BBs > 15 mm were related to esophageal impaction (RR = 19, CI_95% [4.1; 88]). The absence of initial symptoms was a protective factor for esophageal impaction (RR = 0.013, CI_95% [0.002; 0.1]). Nine symptoms were closely related (RR > 30) to major effects and death: dyspnea, cough, dysphagia, drooling, fever, hemodynamic instability, pain, pallor, and vomiting. Seven symptoms were related to esophageal impaction and their rapid recognition could help to ensure that the patient is taken to a health care facility. Nine factors were related to the major effects of BB ingestion. We recommended an X-ray as soon as possible to determine the position of the BB.Trial Registry: Clinical Trial ID: NCT03708250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03708250.

Electronic medical record based tools: Not a panacea in the diagnosis of coin-shaped foreign bodies

INTRODUCTION

Electronic medical record-based tools have been demonstrated to improve timeliness of x-ray order placement in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with coin-shaped foreign body ingestion. Similar efforts directed towards downstream processes are necessary to expedite diagnosis of an esophageal button battery. We predicted that improvement tools such as electronic medical record-based alerts and process standardization could be utilized to expedite x-ray completion.

METHODS

Using Plan, Do, Study, Act methodology, iterative interventions were implemented. In July 2017 a previously designed best practice advisory was linked to an automated notification page to the x-ray technician. Next, a standardized process was created where patients were gowned in triage and placed in a designated space awaiting x-ray. Workflow planning began in December 2018 and was formalized in February 2019. Time from arrival to x-ray completion was tracked for patients presenting with coin-shaped foreign body ingestion. Control charts were used to determine special cause variation.

RESULTS

An average of 10.1 patients (Range 4-21) presented monthly to the ED with coin-shaped foreign body ingestion. Automated pages to the x-ray technician were not associated with improved time to x-ray completion. Upon initiation of the new patient workflow, median time to x-ray completion decreased from 37.4 to 23.3 min.

CONCLUSION

Time to x-ray completion in children presenting to the ED with ingestion of coin-shaped foreign bodies is not improved solely through electronic notification of the imaging technologist. Efforts to standardize processes for patient intake and placement are associated with more timely completion of imaging studies. Generalizability of findings may depend on contextual elements of individual healthcare units.

MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING BUTTON BATTERY INGESTION

Ingestion of button batteries by children is increasing every year, which is becoming a clinical problem for pediatricians. The number of complications and mortality when using batteries exceeds similar indicators when accidentally swallowing other foreign bodies. This is due to the electrochemical and mechanical effect of the battery on the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract and especially the esophagus. With a late diagnosis, an ordinary battery leads to the development of fatal complications. In modern literature, there are no protocols that would relate to the treatment of similar situations, in particular, in the development of a tracheoesophageal fistula. The article describes a case of successful treatment of a tracheoesophageal fistula due to a long-term stay of a battery in the esophagus. This condition was also complicated by the development of bilateral tension pneumothorax. The dilemma in such cases is always difficult: to choose operative or conservative treatment. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. In this clinical case, preference was given to conservative treatment, which ended quite successfully. But the main goal is to prevent such situations. This can be achieved by raising parents' awareness of the risks of battery ingestion. Also, the efforts of a doctor who is faced with a similar situation should be directed to the fastest possible diagnosis and removal of such a foreign body as a battery.

Role of Honey and Acetic Acid in Mitigating the Effects of Button Battery in Esophageal Mucosa: A Cadaveric Animal Model Experimental Study

The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of honey and acetic acid in mitigating the mucosal injury posed by button battery using esophagus specimens from goat cadavers. This was an in vitro experimental cadaveric animal model laboratory study. We used 40 specimens of cadaveric goat esophagus and divided into four groups (A, B, C and D). The first comparison was between group A (specimens with button battery only) and group B (specimens with button battery coated with honey) for the difference in the degree of mucosal injury and change in pH and temperature. The second comparison was between group C (specimens with button battery removed after six hours) and group D (specimens with 5% acetic acid applied following the removal of the battery after six hours) for the difference in the progression of the mucosal injury and change in pH and temperature. The observer was blinded regarding the allocation of the groups. We used Fisher's exact test and independent sample t-test, to evaluate the statistical association. There was a statistically significant reduction in the degree of mucosal injury in specimens applied with button battery coated with honey compared to the specimens applied with button battery only. Similarly, progression of the mucosal injury was halted in specimens with the application of acetic acid following the removal of the button battery. Honey and acetic acid can mitigate the mucosal effects posed by the button battery in cadaveric goat esophageal specimens.

A Rare Incidence of Neonatal Button Battery Ingestion: A Case of Child Abuse and Neglect

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is not uncommon, especially when the child beings coordination of the hands and mouth from 6 months to 5 years of age. However, FB ingestion in the neonatal period is extremely rare. We present a one-month-old baby with button battery ingestion to report the unusual age of presentation, unusual clinical findings, and child abuse. A radiopaque, spherical FB was visible in the upper chest on the chest X-ray. After performing an oesophagoscopy, the battery was removed, and the patient was put on a plan of anti-GERD medications and gradual nasogastric tube feeding. The patient was coping well under the supervision of the healthcare professional. However, the patient’s father decided to take the patient home against medical advice, and since then, no follow-up has been conducted by the patient’s guardians. In conclusion, neonatal foreign body ingestion is rare, and early detection and management can save neonates’ lives. Saudi Arabia’s national child protection teams, working under the National Family Safety Program, should strictly implement approved programs to prevent child abuse and teach positive parenting skills.

Time Is Money in Case of a Button Battery Ingestion

Button battery (BB) ingestion is a preventable pediatric health hazard with important morbidity and mortality due to complications. We present 3 pediatric patients with a complicated course after BB ingestion and discuss current guidelines. Urgent endoscopic removal is necessary for every BB impacted in the esophagus. A new strategy before endoscopic removal is the administration of honey or sucralfate. During endoscopy, rinsing the esophageal mucosae with acetic acid can neutralize the alkalic environment and prevent late complications. Prevention of ingestion needs to be pursued by increasing awareness and changing legislation of packaging of BB.

Management of oesophageal foreign bodies in children: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center

OBJECTIVE

Oesophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are a common emergency issue in paediatrics, and few studies have revealed its clinical features and treatment methods. We conducted this retrospective study to provide our 10-year clinical evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of EFB and reduce the incidence of complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all paediatric cases diagnosed with EFB from January 2012 to December 2021 at Shenzhen Children's Hospital. The age and sex of the patients, types of foreign bodies (FBs), preoperative examination, location and duration of FB impaction, clinical symptoms, surgical methods, therapeutic effects and complications were analysed.

RESULTS

Among the 1355 cases, 759 were boys and 596 were girls, with a median age of 2.9 years (4 months to 16 years). The shortest FB lodged time was 1 hour, while the longest time was 3 months. The types of foreign bodies included coins and blunt objects (812,59.9%), bones and sharp objects (278,20.5%), button batteries (86,6.3%), food impactions (84,6.2%), toys (51,3.8%) and plastic objects (44,3.2%). A total of 720 of 812 cases impacted by coins and blunt subjects were successfully treated with a Foley catheter without any complications. A total of 558 patients underwent rigid oesophageal endoscopy under general anaesthesia, and foreign bodies were successfully removed in 525 cases. No FB was found in 33 cases, and FBs pushed into the lower digestive tract during operation in 5 cases. Oesophageal injury was found in 130 cases (23.3%). Our study showed that the age of the patient, time of foreign body incarceration, type of foreign body, location of the lodged foreign body, and fever or cough were risk factors leading to oesophageal foreign body complications, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Children with EFB have a risk of complications, especially if the FB is a button battery. The appropriate surgical method should be selected through the analysis of the clinical characteristics of the foreign body in the oesophagus and the risk factors for complications to reduce the incidence of complications. Health education and effective care are the keys to the prevention of EFB.

Toxicology in the emergency department: what's new?

Intentional and accidental drug overdose, recreational drug use and exposure to toxic substances are common reasons for people presenting to emergency departments. Although the mortality rate associated with these presentations is low in the UK, they can lead to significant morbidity and prolonged hospital admissions.

This review discusses new developments in the management of paracetamol overdose. Several new protocols for the infusion of acetylcysteine, the antidote for paracetamol overdose, have been proposed in the past decade and evaluated in clinical studies. The 12-hour Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol regimen and 20-hour Australian two-infusion bag protocol have been widely adopted into clinical practice and endorsed in national guidelines because of their shorter duration, reduction in adverse effects and efficacy in treating overdose. This article includes a care pathway that can facilitate the implementation of the Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol.

This article also discusses the emergency management of ingested button batteries, describes the emerging threat of novel psychoactive substances, and provides an update on new UK antidote guidelines. Further up-to-date guidance on management of clinical toxicology is available to healthcare professionals on the internet database TOXBASE.

Protocol of care for foreign-body ingestion in children: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to suggest a care protocol for foreign-body ingestion, address the clinical aspects, and identify the ingested object, severity, and professional conduct.

METHODS:

This is a qualitative study. We used books and original articles published in national and international journals (BIREME, SCIELO, LILACS, and MEDLINE/PubMed) in Portuguese, Spanish, and English.

RESULTS:

The ingestion of a radiolucent object should be evaluated radiographically and with endoscopy for cases with symptoms of impaction and radiolucent objects. Coins are the most commonly involved foreign bodies. In asymptomatic patients, it often requires only a conservative form of management. Ingestion of batteries, magnets, and sharp objects carries a high risk of serious clinical complications and should have an endoscopic or surgical approach. In view of this, each pediatric emergency service, based on these recommendations, has the possibility to develop an individual protocol to identify and remove the ingested foreign body.

CONCLUSIONS:

Protocol of care for foreign-body ingestion in children depends on the object ingested, time of ingestion, symptoms, and local epidemiological context. This study provides some suggestions for decision-making in the conduct of health professionals.

Pediatric Battery-Related Emergency Department Visits in the United States: 2010-2019

OBJECTIVES

To describe the epidemiology of battery-related emergency department (ED) visits among children aged <18 years in the United States from 2010 to 2019 and compare with previous study findings.

METHODS

Data on ED visits were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Using narrative descriptions and diagnosis codes, battery-related cases were coded into four exposure routes: (1) ingestion, (2) mouth exposure, (3) ear insertion, and (4) nasal insertion.

RESULTS

An estimated 70 322 (95% confidence interval: 51 275-89 369) battery-related ED visits among children aged <18 years occurred during the study period, or 9.5 per 100 000 children annually. Button batteries were implicated in 84.7% of visits where battery type was described. A statistically significant increase in the ED visit rate occurred from 2010 to 2017 (P = .03), followed by a nonstatistically significant decrease from 2017 to 2019. The ED visit rate was highest among children aged ≤5 years compared with those 6 to 17 years (24.5 and 2.2 per 100 000 children, respectively). The mean patient age was 3.2 years (95% confidence interval: 2.9-3.4). Ingestions accounted for 90.0% of ED visits, followed by nasal insertions (5.7%), ear insertions (2.5%), and mouth exposures (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric battery-related ED visit rates continued to significantly increase from 2010 to 2017, with children aged ≤5 years having the highest rates. Prevention efforts have not significantly reduced injury rates; therefore, regulatory efforts are needed. Ultimately, hazard reduction or elimination through safer button battery design is critical and should be adopted by the battery industry.

Button Battery Ingestion: A Case Report

This case report describes a 17-month-old child with ingestion of a button battery. The clinical presentation, diagnostic reasoning, national guidelines, hospital course, and follow-up are discussed. Between 1995 and 2015, an estimated 759,074 children aged < 6 years were seen in emergency departments for suspected or confirmed foreign body ingestions, representing a 93.3% increase in cases . The most common objects ingested were coins, toys, jewelry, and batteries. The most common battery ingested was a button battery. Although 80% to 90% of ingested foreign objects pass without intervention, a button battery positioned in the esophagus is an emergency requiring immediate removal.

Button battery taping prevents oesophageal injury

AIM

Most button battery (BB) ingestions in children are unwitnessed leading to prolonged exposures and severe complications. One third of ingestions occur from free BB, that are stored or awaiting disposal. Recommendations have been made to cover the terminals of discarded BB with adhesive tape; however, it is unclear if this practice prevents injury. Our aim was to determine if tape could prevent oesophageal injury in a cadaveric porcine model.

METHODS

Electrical, masking, packing and duct tape were compared. One BB was left untaped. Taped BBs were placed in a cadaveric porcine oesophagus controlled for temperature and humidification. Specimens were assessed at 0, 0.5, and hourly for 6 h by visual inspection, temperature and pH. BB voltage was measured before and after testing. All tests were repeated in triplicate.

RESULTS

Oesophageal specimens demonstrated burn prevention in the packing and duct tape trials. Burns were seen in 2/3 trials with electrical tape and 3/3 trials with masking tape. pH remained neutral throughout the study for all packing and duct tape specimens. pH remained neutral initially for masking tape but increased rapidly to 12 by 2 h. There was no change in battery voltage for the packing tape and duct tape trials. There was a 16.3% reduction in voltage for masking tape which was similar to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Taping BB with packing tape and duct tape prevented oesophageal burns. This may provide a novel method of burn prevention for loose BB intended for disposal.

Airway Complications Resulting From Pediatric Esophageal Button Battery Impaction: A Systematic Review

Importance

Button batteries (BBs) are commonly found in many household items and present a risk of severe injury to children if ingested. The direct apposition of the trachea and recurrent laryngeal nerves with the esophagus puts children at risk of airway injury secondary to the liquefactive necrotic effects of BB impactions.

Objective

To review airway injuries, including long-term sequelae, after BB ingestion in children.

Evidence Review

For this systematic review, a comprehensive strategy was designed to search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) from inception to July 31, 2021, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Additional cases were identified from the National Capital Poison Center BB registry. Individual authors were contacted for additional information. Studies with pediatric patients (<18 years) who developed airway injuries after BB ingestion were included. A total of 195 patients were included in the analysis; 95 were male. The mean (SD) age at BB ingestion was 17.8 (10.2) months. The mean (SD) time from BB ingestion to removal was 5.8 (9.0) days. The 2 most common airway sequelae observed in our series were 155 tracheoesophageal fistulae and 16 unilateral vocal cord paralyses. Twenty-three children had bilateral vocal cord paralysis. The mean (SD) duration of ingestion leading to vocal cord paralysis was shorter than that of the general cohort (17.8 [22.5] hours vs 138.7 [216.7] hours, respectively). Children presenting with airway symptoms were likely to have a subsequent tracheoesophageal fistula or vocal cord paralysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

Airway injuries are a severe consequence of BB ingestion, occurring more often in younger children. This systematic review found that tracheoesophageal fistulae and vocal cord paralyses were the 2 most common airway injuries, often requiring tracheostomy. Vocal cord injury occurred after a shorter BB exposure time than other airway injuries. Continued efforts should be directed toward prevention strategies to avoid the devastating sequelae of BB-associated airway injury.

[Treatment of complications following esophageal electrochemical burns by batteries in children]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal treatment of patients with complications of esophageal electrochemical burns by batteries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 75 children with esophageal electrochemical burns by batteries between 2010 and 2019. All children underwent X-ray of the cervical spine, chest and abdomen, esophagoscopy with removal of the battery, tracheoscopy. Complications occurred in 39 children: TEF - 21, esophageal stenosis - 19, laryngeal paresis - 14, esophageal perforation - 3. Patients with TEF were divided into 2 groups: clinically stable children without respiratory failure and severe illness with respiratory failure including mechanical ventilation. Group I consisted of 6 children, four of them underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and gastrostomy. Group II consisted of 15 children. In acute period, 3 children underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and gastrostomy, 8 ones - TEF ligation, 4 patients - tracheal repair with esophageal flap and esophageal extirpation. Patients with esophageal stenosis underwent bougienage. Patients with esophageal perforation required therapy. Tracheostomy was necessary for respiratory failure and bilateral laryngeal paresis. Lateralization procedures were performed in patients with negative course of disease.

RESULTS

In the 1st group, spontaneous closure of TEF was found in 3 children after fundoplication and gastrostomy. One child underwent thoracoscopic disconnection of TEF after reduction of fistula. In the 2nd group, fundoplication resulted spontaneous closure of fistula after 2-5 months. In 4 children, recanalization of the fistula or esophageal failure were observed in acute period after TEF ligation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic fundoplication and gastrostomy are optimal for TEF and can result complete or partial spontaneous closure of TEF. If radical procedure is necessary in acute period, tracheal repair with esophageal flap and extirpation of the esophagus with subsequent coloesophagoplasty should be considered.

Disc battery ingestion in paediatric age

AIM

The aim of the present study was to analyse clinical data of children referred for disc battery ingestion in order to assess short- and long-term reported injuries and to identify outcome predictors and trends, define the urgency of intervention and refine treatment guidelines.

METHODS

The records of all children admitted to Santobono-Pausilipon Children's Hospital, Naples, Italy for disc battery ingestion from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Odds ratio were computed to assess the association between the different study variables and the rate of complications.

RESULTS

We enrolled 118 children. Mild to major complications related to the ingested disc batteries were reported in 12/118 (10.2%) patients. Disc battery oesophageal retention, disc battery diameter >20 mm, together with age below 1 year and symptomatic presentation were the most important factors associated with poor clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm that ingested disc batteries are a serious health hazard and require a timely and qualified medical evaluation. We have identified three predictors of outcome severity: oesophageal retention, large-diameter cells and symptom onset. Disc batteries lodged beyond the oesophagus appear substantially harmless and we may support a more conservative approach.

Management of oesophageal impaction of button batteries in Queensland

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal button battery impaction (OBBI) is a medical emergency requiring timely removal due to rapid oesophageal tissue injury. The aim of this study was to characterize circumstances of OBBI and identify potential barriers to timely removal of button batteries (BB) in the paediatric population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of OBBI cases between January 2018 to June 2019. Medical records were used to obtain patient demographics, battery size and type, battery source, location of initial presentation and outcomes. Time to obtaining x-ray, transfer to tertiary centre and to removal of button battery were recorded.

RESULTS

Eight cases of OBBI were recorded during the 18 months study timeframe. Six patients were male and two were female, aged 0.97 to 2.8 years. Six were from an English-speaking background and two were from families of non-English speaking background. Battery removal occurred at Queensland Children's Hospital (QCH) in seven of eight cases. Time from ingestion to initial presentation to hospital ranged from 39 min to 123 h with a mean time of 2 h and 13 min. Overall, the total time from ingestion of BB to removal ranged from 2 h 54 min to 126 h 51 min.

CONCLUSION

Despite being recognized as a time critical emergency, diagnostic, geographic and logistic challenges in Queensland make optimal care a challenge. Primary prevention strategies coupled with an expanded network for safe battery removal, and novel management strategies such as honey and acetic acid could improve care and reduce morbidity.

Button battery taping and disposal: Risk reduction strategies for the household setting

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric esophageal button battery (BB) injury occurs rapidly and continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, a BB that no longer supplies power to a device can still have enough residual voltage to cause injury within the body. Development of additional prevention strategies for consumers may reduce esophageal injury risk.

METHODS

In this study, 24 commercially available button batteries (BBs) were horizontally and vertically wrapped (2 layers, full circumferential coverage, 90° apart) with 6 different types of common household tapes (Scotch®/clear, Scotch®/Magic, masking tape, packing tape/clear, packing tape/brown, black electrical tape) and left at room temperature for 30 days. In addition, 6 of the CR2032 batteries covered with each type of tape were placed in a cadaveric piglet esophageal model for a 4-h period and then compared to controls without tape for tissue pH changes and visible tissue injury.

RESULTS

None of the tape-wrapped batteries showed voltage changes nor presented any hazard stemming from BB ingestion. All 6 tape covered batteries placed in the cadaveric piglet esophageal tissue model demonstrated no visible tissue injury and no change in tissue pH in contrast to the controls. Review of BB packaging language from various brands of commercially available CR2032 batteries showed that none had specific disposal recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Both BB and electronics manufacturers should consider instructing the use of common household tape options to cover these BB immediately after removal from a device for either recycling or disposal. Such precautions may help to reduce related ingestion injuries in children.

Evolving Clinical Care in Esophageal Button Batteries: Impact of Expert-Opinion Guideline Adoption and Continued Gaps in Care

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Esophageal button battery impactions (BBI) in children pose a significant danger to children. Although there are expert-opinion guidelines to help manage this population, few studies detail the impact of guidelines on the clinical care of these patients. With this study, we aimed to describe the care of these patients before and following adoption of guidelines at a single center.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with esophageal BBI at a single center, large volume, urban academic pediatric hospital system before adoption of expert-opinion guidelines (2007-2017) and following adoption (2018-2020).

RESULTS

Cohort was comprised of 31 patients before adoption and 32 patients following adoption of guidelines. Patient characteristics did not differ between groups. After 2018, significantly more patients received acetic acid irrigation, initial cross-sectional imaging, and serial cross-sectional imaging. There was also an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) stays, number of intubations, nil per os time, and hospital length of stay. There was no difference in patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study describes a large cohort of pediatric esophageal BBI before and following adoption of guidelines. Findings detail increased adherence to guidelines resulting in more cross-sectional imaging which led to ICU stays, longer length of stays, and more nil per os time. This study emphasizes the need for multi-disciplinary guidelines as well as further multi-institutional study.

Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity related to childhood battery ingestions (BI) has increased recently due to the expanding use of larger lithium cells. A prompt endoscopic removal is vital to prevent severe complications in cases of esophageal batteries (EB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive study of admissions for BI requiring endoscopic removal in a tertiary hospital's pediatric emergency department (Jan. 2011/Dec. 2020).

RESULTS

We had 35 cases, with an increasing incidence in the last 6 years; median age, 26 m (8 m-10 years), witnessed ingestion in 86%. On the X-ray: 14 (40%) had an EB, 21 (60%), a gastric battery (GB). Symptoms were present in 57% (100% EB/24% GB), and vomiting was the most frequent (50%). Endoscopy revealed: EB, 13 (37%); GB, 17 (49%); duodenal battery, 1 (3%); no battery, 4 (11%). Median time to removal: EB, 7 h (2 h-21days); GB, 12 h (2 h-3 days). All the patients with EB on the X-ray (14) had severe mucosal injury (Zargar classification): Grade IIIa, 7 (50%); IIIb, 5 (36%); IV, 2 (14%). CT-scan showed perforation in 2 patients (total, 4; 29% of EB). In patients with GB (21), 14 (67%) had mucosal damage; 13 (93%), mild (< Grade III, two esophageal erosions); 1 (7%) IIIa (esophageal ulceration). A statistically significant association between exposure time, younger age or battery size and severity of endoscopic lesions was found in EB location. There were no mortality cases. Acute complications occurred in 57% of EB: infection, 50%; perforation, 29%; pneumomediastinum/stridor, 14%; pneumothorax/subglottic stenosis/hemodynamic instability, 7 vs. 0% GB. Stenosis subsequently developed in 6 (43%) of EB: mild, 4 cases (29%); severe, 2 cases (14%, one resolved after endoscopic dilation; one needed a gastrostomy and esophagocoloplasty).

CONCLUSION

We verified recent increase in admissions due to battery ingestions and associated complications, despite the availability of an emergency pediatric endoscopy team. The patients with EB had more severe mucosal injury and poorer short/long-term outcomes. Children with GB had milder lesions, although the presence of a GB did not exclude esophageal injury. The availability of actual data from national referral centers will support advocacy efforts among stakeholders, including industry representatives and policy makers, in preventing worldwide button battery injury.

Electric Insulating Irrigations Mitigates Esophageal Injury Caused by Button Battery Ingestion

OBJECTIVE

Accidental ingestion of button batteries (BB), usually occurred in children and infants, will rapidly erode the esophagus and result in severe complications, even death. It has been recommended that treatment of this emergent accident as soon as possible with drinking of pH-neutralizing viscous solutions such as honey and sucralfate before surgical removal can mitigate the esophageal injury. Recently, we reported that the electric insulating solutions such as edible oils could mitigate tissue damage in BB-exposed esophageal segments. In this study, we compared the protective effect of kitchen oil with honey or sucralfate, the recommended pH-neutralizing beverages, and with their mixture on esophageal injury caused by BB ingestion in pig esophageal segments and in living piglets.

METHODS

Effect of olive oil irrigations was compared to that of honey or sucralfate irrigations in the BB-damaged esophageal segments freshly collected from the local abattoir and in live Bama miniature piglets with the proximal esophagus exposed to BB for 60 min. Also, the effect of olive oil and honey mixture (MOH) irrigations was assessed in live animals. The BB voltage was recorded before insertion and after its removal. Gross and histological analysis of the esophageal injury was performed after BB exposure in segmented fresh esophagus and 7 days after BB exposure in live animals, respectively.

RESULTS

Olive oil irrigations demonstrated better protective effect against BB-induced esophageal damage, compared to honey or sucralfate for BB-induced esophageal damage in vitro. But in vivo study showed that olive oil alone exacerbated esophageal injury because all esophagi irrigated with olive oil perforated. Surprisingly, irrigations with the MOH showed considerable protective effect for BB-induced esophageal damage in live animals, significantly better than irrigations with honey alone. The MOH decreased BB discharge, reduced area of surface injury, attenuated injured depth of esophageal wall thickness, and downed the mucosal injury index in comparison to using honey alone.

CONCLUSION

Irrigations with olive oil alone couldn't prevent the BB discharge and is harmful for BB ingestion before surgical removal. However, mixed with honey, olive oil very effectively prevents the BB discharging and produces better esophageal protection than honey.

What's Inside of a AA Battery? An Unusual Caustic Ingestion in an Infant

Current guidelines for the management of battery ingestions in children focus on button batteries due to the risk of morbidity and mortality. In our review of the literature, there is little information on the ingestion of cylindrical AA or AAA battery contents. We report a case of an 11-month-old female who ingested the internal alkaline contents of a AA battery. The ingestion resulted in oropharyngeal and esophageal caustic injuries visualized on upper endoscopy. Imaging has long been used for localizing ingested whole batteries. In our case, standard radiograph confirmed that internal battery contents were ingested. Advanced imaging modalities, including computed tomography, have been suggested as methods to investigate the degree of caustic injury and were utilized in this case. Our case is one of the few reported cases of the ingestion of alkaline battery contents alone.

"Black ring-shaped burn" in button battery ingestion is not a burn - Comparison with charring using spectral CT

OBJECTIVES

To compare "black ring-shaped burn" (BRSB) and charring using spectral computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Spectral CT was performed using chicken pectoralis minor muscle, processed in three ways and unprocessed as a control: a) BRSB generated by bringing the negative pole surface of a 3 V button battery (BB) into contact with the muscle; b) BRSB caused by a 1.5 V BB; c) charring caused by broiling; and d) control. Attenuation values were compared between BRSB and charring. Muscles were formalin-fixed and stained with Perls' Prussian blue.

RESULTS

Attenuation values from polychromatic 120-kVp images were significantly higher for BRSBs than for charring. In the spectral Hounsfield unit curve, attenuation values for BRSBs were higher for lower energy. Histopathologically, BRSBs stained positively with Perls' Prussian blue.

CONCLUSIONS

This study using spectral CT revealed that BRSB contains metal and confirmed the presence of Fe³⁺ histopathologically. BRSB differs from charring due to burns.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The exact composition of BRSB remains unclear, but this report is the first to show that BRSB differs from charring using spectral CT. Clarification of the composition of BRSB is expected to facilitate the development of more effective BRSB removal therapy.

Survival of Toddler with Aortoesophageal Fistula after Button Battery Ingestion

Button batteries (BBs) are found in many households and are a source of esophageal foreign body in the pediatric population. Upon ingestion, significant caustic injury can occur within 2 hours leading to tissue damage and severe, potentially fatal sequelae. Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication that nearly always results in mortality. We report a rare case of a toddler who developed an AEF after BB ingestion and survived following staged aortic repair. There should be a high index of suspicion for this complication with the history of BB ingestion and presence of hematemesis, hemoptysis, or melena.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings following button battery ingestion

BACKGROUND

Lithium button battery ingestions have been increasing in frequency since the early 2000s and can develop severe and sometimes fatal complications from caustic injury even after rapid battery removal. To aid in clinical decision-making, we began obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/MR angiography in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to review MRI/MR angiography imaging in button battery ingestion cases and compare with other imaging, clinical data and outcomes in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective institutional-review-board-approved study, we reviewed all button battery ingestion cases with MRI from April 2012 to September 2018. Clinical data, endoscopic findings and all imaging studies were rereviewed. MRIs were evaluated for inflammation, blooming artifact and complications including vascular injury, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal perforation and spondylodiscitis, and compared to endoscopy, esophagram and bronchoscopy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with button battery ingestions had a total of 51 MRI/MR angiograms. Seventy percent of the cohort was male with a median age of 2 years (range: 0.94-17 years). Severe complications were found in 48% of patients (11/23), including esophageal perforation (n=11), tracheoesophageal fistula (n=3) and spondylodiscitis (n=1). No patients had vascular injury. Cervical location of the battery was significantly associated with severe complications (10/11 cases). The length of the blooming artifact was greater than 2 cm in those with severe complications and, in most cases, <2 cm in those without severe complications. All complications were seen on initial screening MR exam with serial exams showing decreased inflammation.

CONCLUSION

MRI/MR angiography can provide valuable information about complications, including esophageal perforation, tracheoesophageal fistula and spondylodiscitis. Decreasing inflammation surrounding the esophagus and vasculature is believed to be clinically reassuring and aids in managing button battery ingestion patients.

Endoscopic Evaluation for Stricture Formation Post Button Battery Ingestion

Every year, there are over 3300 ingestions of button batteries, mostly by young children. Initial presentation of button battery ingestion may be nonspecific, with a delay in diagnosis and removal resulting in increased risk of complications. We present the case of a five-year-old female who presented with vomiting following unwitnessed button battery ingestion. The battery was impacted in the middle esophagus for at least six hours. Endoscopy was performed for immediate removal and showed a Grade 2B erosion, warranting nasogastric tube placement. The patient remained asymptomatic following discharge and had a barium swallow that was read as normal. However, a repeat endoscopy one month later visualized stricture formation at the previous battery injury site. This case highlights the importance of both clinician and parent awareness of button battery ingestion and demonstrates that endoscopy provides the most accurate assessment of esophageal injury and complication development, even in asymptomatic patients.

Ingestion von Knopfzellen – Spannung für alle Beteiligten

Es werden 3 klinische Fälle im Ösophagus feststeckender Knopfzellen mit endoskopischer Entfernung 5 h sowie 3 und 12 Monate nach Ingestion präsentiert. Bei zunehmender Verweildauer der Knopfzelle kam es zu immer stärker ausgeprägten ösophagealen Kolliquationsnekrosen bis hin zu fast vollständiger Stenose des Ösophagus mit Verdrängung der Trachea.

Successful management of an aorto-esophageal fistula following button battery ingestion: A case report and review of the literature

Foreign body ingestion is a common event among pediatric patients, especially in children less than 6 years of age. Although most cases are relatively benign, with the foreign body passing spontaneously or requiring a brief endoscopic procedure for removal, button battery ingestion is known to cause significant morbidity with the potential for mortality. Although aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication following button battery ingestion, its clinical manifestations are significant and outcomes are poor. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are key in preventing fatal complications. We describe the successful management of an AEF which presented with hematemesis 8 days after removal of a button battery in a 17-month-old female. The literature regarding button battery ingestion and AEF is reviewed and treatment options including intraoperative anesthetic care discussed.

Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Button Battery Ingestion in Childhood: A European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition Position Paper

ABSTRACT

Button batteries (BB) remain a health hazard to children as ingestion might lead to life-threatening complications, especially if the battery is impacted in the esophagus. Worldwide initiatives have been set up in order to prevent and also timely diagnose and manage BB ingestions. A European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) task force for BB ingestions has been founded, which aimed to contribute to reducing the health risks related to this event. It is important to focus on the European setting, next to other worldwide initiatives, to develop and implement effective management strategies. As one of the first initiatives of the ESPGHAN task force, this ESPGHAN position paper has been written. The literature is summarized, and prevention strategies are discussed focusing on some controversial topics. An algorithm for the diagnosis and management of BB ingestions is presented and compared to previous guidelines (NASPGHAN, National Poison Center). In agreement with earlier guidelines, immediate localization of the BB is important and in case of esophageal impaction, the BB should be removed instantly (preferably <2 hours). Honey and sucralfate can be considered in ingestions ≤12 hours while waiting for endoscopic removal but should not delay it. In case of delayed diagnosis (first confirmation of the BB on X-ray >12 hours after ingestion or time point of removal >12 hours after ingestion) and esophageal impaction the guideline suggests to perform a CT scan in order to evaluate for vascular injury before removing the battery. In delayed diagnosis, even if the battery has passed the esophagus, endoscopy to screen for esophageal damage and a CT scan to rule out vascular injury should be considered even in asymptomatic children. In asymptomatic patients with early diagnosis (≤12 hours after ingestion) and position of the BB beyond the esophagus, one can monitor with repeat X-ray (if not already evacuated in stool) in 7 to 14 days, which is different from previous guidelines where repeat X-ray and removal is recommended after 2-4 days and is also based on age. Finally, prevention strategies are discussed in this paper.

Bilateral vocal fold palsy due to ingested battery in the postcricoid area/proximal esophagus

Stridor is a common symptom associated with foreign body aspiration. In most cases, this is due to the foreign bodies lodging in the supraglottis, glottis, subglottis, or high extra-thoracic trachea. Infrequently, foreign bodies located in the esophagus cause stridor. The ingestion of button batteries (BBs) has been reported to cause multiple problems. The incidence has been estimated at 10.5 per million people per year with a case fatality rate of 0.5%. BBs predominantly cause esophageal mucosal injury. Mechanisms of injury include pressure necrosis, electrolysis, caustic exposure, or heavy metal toxicity. The reported complications include severe esophageal ulceration, trachea-esophageal fistula or aorto-esophageal fistula, and pneumonia. Vocal fold pathology after battery ingestion, other than edema of cords, has been rarely reported. We describe a case of acute bilateral vocal fold dysfunction and review the literature.

Current management of aerodigestive foreign bodies in children

Foreign bodies ingestion or aspiration events in children can be a source of morbidity and mortality. In most cases, removal by a coordinated endoscopy can be performed when there is the availability of equipment and support staff for pediatric care. Close communication with the anesthesia, surgeon and operating room support staff is essential and rehearsing with a facsimile of the foreign body is useful. In certain cases, such as sharp foreign bodies or button batteries the endoscopy should be performed immediately.

Current management of button battery injuries

Button batteries (BB) are found in common household items and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population when ingested. BBs are made of various chemistries and have a unique size and shape that yield significant injury when lodged in the pediatric esophagus. BBs create a local tissue pH environment of 10 to 13 and can induce liquefactive necrosis at the negative pole. This initial injury can progress with further tissue breakdown even after removal. Unfortunately, patients may present with vague symptoms similar to viral illnesses and there is not always a known history of ingestion. Plain film X-ray can be diagnostic. Exposure can lead to caustic injury within 2 hours. Thus, timely endoscopic removal is the mainstay of treatment. Novel mitigation and neutralization strategies have been implemented into treatment guidelines. These include the preremoval ingestion of honey or sucralfate and intraoperative irrigation with acetic acid. Depending on the severity of injury following removal, careful consideration should be given for potential delayed complications including fistulization into major vessels which often leads to death. The National Button Battery Taskforce and several industry members have implemented prevention strategies such as educational safety outreach campaigns, child-resistant packaging changes, and warning labels. Governmental regulation and industry changes are key to limit not only the amount of BB ingestions, but also the devastating consequences that can result. Anonymous reporting of BB injuries through the Global Injury Research Collaborative has been made convenient and centralized through the advent of a user-friendly smartphone iOS/App Store and Android/GooglePlay application called the "GIRC App"; all specialists who manage foreign body cases should contribute their cases to help prevent future injuries. BB ingestion must be recognized and treated promptly using a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes for these patients. Ultimately, a safer BB technology is critically needed to reduce or eliminate the severe and life-threatening injuries in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.