The assessment of mucosal surgical margins in head and neck cancer surgery with narrow band imaging

Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In oral cancers, tumour borders are typically defined by white light (WL). Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an optical endoscopic technique commonly used for the larynx and for cancers of unknown primary. However, evidence for using NBI in oral cancers is insufficient.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether NBI is a better predictor of the true mucosal tumour borders than WL in oral cancers. Additionally, we examined the agreement between NBI-based Takano intrapapillary capillary loop classifications and pathology reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, the tumour borders were assessed by both NBI and WL at the time of surgical resection and then compared. Pathology reports of the examined areas were used as gold standard.

RESULTS

Forty-nine participants were included. After exclusion of 15 patients due to missing data, 34 were included in analyses. In 26.5% of the assessments, the tumour borders defined by NBI were outside the borders defined by WL. However, 55.5% of these were false-positives.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The delineation of mucosal tumour borders in oral cancers by NBI was not better than that by WL in this study. Several methodological challenges may have influenced the findings of this study, similar to the limitations reported in previous studies.

Endoscopic In Vivo Hyperspectral Imaging for Head and Neck Tumor Surgeries Using a Medically Approved CE-Certified Camera with Rapid Visualization During Surgery

Background: In vivo visualization of malignant tumors remains the main challenge during head and neck cancer surgery. This can result in inadequate tumor margin assessment and incomplete tumor resection, adversely affecting patient outcomes. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a promising approach to address this issue. However, its application in surgery has been limited by the lack of medically approved HSI devices compliant with MDR regulations, as well as challenges regarding the integration into the surgical workflow. Methods: In this feasibility study, we employed endoscopic HSI during surgery to visualize the tumor sites of 12 head and neck cancer patients. We optimized the HSI workflow to minimize time required during surgery and to reduce the adaptation period needed for surgeons to adjust to the new workflow. Additionally, we implemented data processing to enable real-time classification and visualization of HSI within the intraoperative setting. HSI evaluation was conducted using principal component analysis and k-means clustering, with this clustering validated through comparison with expert annotations. Results: Our complete HSI workflow requires two to three minutes, with each HSI measurement-including evaluation and visualization-taking less than 10 s, achieving an accuracy of 79%, sensitivity of 72%, and specificity of 84%. Medical personnel became proficient with the HSI system after two surgeries. Conclusions: This study presents an HSI workflow for in vivo tissue differentiation during head and neck cancer surgery, providing accurate and visually accessible results within minimal time. This approach enhances the in vivo evaluation of tumor margins, leading to more clear margins and, consequently, improved patient outcomes.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery

This paper is a transcript of the 29 th Eugene N. Myers, MD International Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) in 2020. By the end of the 19 th century, the survival rate in treated patients was 10%. With the improvements in surgical techniques, currently, about two thirds of patients survive for > 5 years. Teamwork and progress in surgical reconstruction have led to advancements in ablative surgery; the associated adjuvant treatments have further improved the prognosis in the last 30 years. However, prospective trials are lacking; most of the accumulated knowledge is based on retrospective series and some real-world data analyses. Current knowledge on prognostic factors plays a central role in an efficient treatment decision-making process. Although the influence of most tumor- and patient-related prognostic factors in head and neck cancer cannot be changed by medical interventions, some environmental factors-including treatment, decision-making, and quality-can be modified. Ideally, treatment strategy decisions should be taken in dedicated multidisciplinary team meetings. However, evidence suggests that surgeons and hospital volume and specialization play major roles in patient survival after initial or salvage head and neck cancer treatment. The metrics of surgical quality assurance (surgical margins and nodal yield) in neck dissection have a significant impact on survival in head and neck cancer patients and can be influenced by the surgeon's expertise. Strategies proposed to improve surgical quality include continuous performance measurement, feedback, and dissemination of best practice measures.

Margins in Stage I and II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review From the American Head and Neck Society

Importance

The assessment and management of surgical margins in stage I and II oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most important perioperative aspects of oncologic care, with profound implications for patient outcomes and adjuvant therapy. Understanding and critically reviewing the existing data surrounding margins in this context is necessary to rigorously care for this challenging group of patients and minimize patient morbidity and mortality.

Observations

This review discusses the data related to the definitions related to surgical margins, methods for assessment, specimen vs tumor bed margin evaluation, and re-resection of positive margins. The observations presented emphasize notable controversy within the field about margin assessment, with early data coalescing around several key aspects of management, although studies are limited by their design.

Conclusions and Relevance

Stage I and II oral cavity cancer requires surgical resection with negative margins to obtain optimal oncologic outcomes, but controversy persists over margin assessment. Future studies with improved, well-controlled study designs are required to more definitively guide margin assessment and management.

TransOral UltraSonic surgery (TOUSS) for oral cavity, oropharyngeal and supraglottic malignancy: A prospective study of feasibility, safety, margins, functional and survival outcomes

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

With the advent of TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) the ease of transoral procedures has been dramatically improved. TORS is already established for its feasibility, functional and oncological outcomes for selected lesions of oral cavity, oropharynx and laryngopharynx. This study reports on preliminary results with TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS) for oncologic resections of oral cavity, oropharyngeal and supraglottic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with malignancies of oral cavity, oropharynx and supraglottis underwent TOUSS with simultaneous neck dissection and adjuvant therapy as indicated, from January 2018 to April 2019. Essential equipment included the FK-retractor (Gyrus Medical, Tuttilngen, Germany) for TransOral exposure, the Olympus ENDOEYE Flex 5 mm 2D/10 mm 3D deflecting tip video laparoscopes, and 35 cm long ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (Thunderbeat). Parameters evaluated include tumor staging, mouth opening, TOUSS setup time, TOUSS primary removal time, surgical margins, blood transfusions, tracheostomy, postoperative complications, enteral feeding and resumption of oral diet, duration of hospital stay, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent complete TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS), with simultaneous unilateral or bilateral neck dissection. No procedure was abandoned intraoperatively due to difficulty in extirpation of the tumor. Margins were negative for ten patients (55.6%), close in five (27.8%), and positive in three patients (16.7%). Average TOUSS set-up time was 22.5 min (range, 10-30 min) and average TOUSS primary tumor removal time was 35.3 min (range, 15-60 min). Patients started tolerating oral feeds even in the second post op day (mean 6 days), and transitioning to complete oral feeds with removal of the nasogastric tube was achieved in all (mean, 16 days). The average hospital stay was 7.4 days (range 2-16 days). Secondary hemorrhage occurred in two cases and required an emergency tracheostomy and ligation of lingual artery. Minor cervicopharyngeal fistula occurred in four cases and settled in all with conservative non-surgical treatment. Overall survival at 3 years was 70.5%, and disease-specific survival was 94.4%.

CONCLUSION

TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS) is a safe and sound alternative method of endoscopic surgical treatment of oral cavity, oropharynx and supraglottic neoplasms. Advantages of this technique include faster resection time, intraoperative assistance from Narrow Band Imaging, easy affordability compared to TORS, and excellent functional outcomes.

Current Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Improve Surgical Resection of Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Laryngeal cancer is a prevalent head and neck malignancy, with poor prognosis and low survival rates for patients with advanced disease. The recurrence rate for advanced laryngeal cancer is between 25 and 50%. In order to improve surgical resection of laryngeal cancer and reduce local recurrence rates, various intraoperative optical imaging techniques have been investigated. In this systematic review we identify these technologies, evaluating the current state and future directions of optical imaging for this indication. Evidently, the investigated imaging modalities are generally unsuitable for deep margin assessment, and, therefore, inadequate to guide resection in advanced laryngeal disease. We discuss two optical imaging techniques that can overcome these limitations and suggest how they can be used to achieve adequate margins in laryngeal cancer at all stages.

Abstract

Laryngeal cancer is a prevalent head and neck malignancy, with poor prognosis and low survival rates for patients with advanced disease. Treatment consists of unimodal therapy through surgery or radiotherapy in early staged tumors, while advanced stage tumors are generally treated with multimodal chemoradiotherapy or (total) laryngectomy followed by radiotherapy. Still, the recurrence rate for advanced laryngeal cancer is between 25 and 50%. In order to improve surgical resection of laryngeal cancer and reduce local recurrence rates, various intraoperative optical imaging techniques have been investigated. In this systematic review, we identify these technologies, evaluating the current state and future directions of optical imaging for this indication. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) and autofluorescence (AF) are established tools for early detection of laryngeal cancer. Nonetheless, their intraoperative utility is limited by an intrinsic inability to image beyond the (sub-)mucosa. Likewise, contact endoscopy (CE) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are technically cumbersome and only useful for mucosal margin assessment. Research on fluorescence imaging (FLI) for this application is sparse, dealing solely with nonspecific fluorescent agents. Evidently, the imaging modalities that have been investigated thus far are generally unsuitable for deep margin assessment. We discuss two optical imaging techniques that can overcome these limitations and suggest how they can be used to achieve adequate margins in laryngeal cancer at all stages.

Narrow-Band Imaging in oncologic otorhinolaryngology: State of the art

OBJECTIVES

To describe the diagnostic performance of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) combined with White Light Imaging (WLI) in the diagnosis of mucosal lesions at each location of the upper aerodigestive tract, for detection of primary tumor in case of carcinoma of unknown primary, for determination of intraoperative resection margins, and to describe its main diagnostic pitfalls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out according to the PRISMA method.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-seven articles published between 2007 and 2020 were identified, 133 of which met the study inclusion criteria and were assessed.

CONCLUSION

The current literature seems to support the use of NBI in diagnosis and/or follow-up of (pre-)malignant head & neck tumors, and in the determination of intraoperative resection margins.

NBI utility in oncologic surgery: An organ by organ review

The main aims of the oncologic surgeon should be an early tumor diagnosis, complete surgical resection, and a careful post-treatment follow-up to ensure a prompt diagnosis of recurrence. Radiologic and endoscopic methods have been traditionally used for these purposes, but their accuracy might sometimes be suboptimal. Technological improvements could help the clinician during the diagnostic and therapeutic management of tumors. Narrow band imaging (NBI) belongs to optical image techniques, and uses light characteristics to enhance tissue vascularization. Because neoangiogenesis is a fundamental step during carcinogenesis, NBI could be useful in the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of tumors. Since its introduction in 2001, NBI use has rapidly spread in different oncologic specialties with clear advantages. There is an active interest in this topic as demonstrated by the thriving literature. It is unavoidable for clinicians to gain in-depth knowledge about the application of NBI to their specific field, losing the overall view on the topic. However, by looking at other fields of application, clinicians could find ideas to improve NBI use in their own specialty. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature on NBI use in oncology, with the aim of providing the state of the art: we present an overview on NBI fields of application, results, and possible future improvements in the different specialties.

Diagnosis and Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on the diagnosis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP).

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2008 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, local and regional disease control, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 100 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Four main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate pathology techniques, and adjuvant therapy.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address preoperative evaluation for patients with a neck mass, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate treatment options in unilateral versus bilateral SCCUP.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Surgical margins in oral squamous cell cancer: intraoperative evaluation and prognostic impact

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent findings regarding surgical management of oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC) through analysis of different intraoperative techniques for assessment of margins, evaluate the pros and cons of each, and ensuing prognostic impact.

RECENT FINDINGS

'En bloc' OSCC resection and histopathologic evaluation of margins on the formalin-fixed specimen remain the 'gold standard' for oral oncologic surgery, whereas assessment of intraoperative surgical margins and its overall clinical value are still questioned and debated in the literature. The commonly applied evaluation of frozen sections still raises concerns regarding its efficacy and reproducibility; therefore, several ancillary diagnostic methods have entered the field of head and neck oncology in the last decades, aiming to support the surgeon in achieving tumor-free margins during ablative procedures.

SUMMARY

Poor prognosis of OSCC is strongly associated with residual tumor after surgery. Negative surgical margins are one of the strongest prognosticators for disease-free survival and locoregional control, but their intraoperative determination seems still to be suboptimal and needs better refinement. The most studied techniques to assess intraoperative margins include fluorescence, Raman spectroscopy, narrow band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and cytological bone margins analysis; each has its unique characteristics that are described in detail herein.