Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty in Pediatric Patients: Is it Safe?

Safety Outcomes of Balloon Dilation Eustachian Tuboplasty in Pediatric Patients: A Follow-Up Study

OBJECTIVES

Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty (BDET) has gained popularity as a treatment modality for chronic eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) in both adults and children. Although its safety and efficacy in the adult population have been well described, very few large-sample studies assessing its safety profile have been performed in the pediatric population. This study serves as a follow-up to a previously published analysis assessing the safety of BDET in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 71 pediatric patients (139 ears) aged 11 ± 7 years who underwent BDET from 2019 to 2023. Medical records were reviewed from the extended postoperative period. A standardized grading scale that assesses severity of surgical complications was used.

RESULTS

A total of five minor complications (7%) were noted. These included transient postoperative tinnitus, hyperacusis, otalgia, nausea, and epistaxis. There were no major complications requiring repeat intervention or need for imaging or hospital admission. In all cases, these symptoms had resolved in the postoperative time frame, with majority of them demonstrating complete resolution before the first postoperative visit.When combining these findings with the previously published paper by the same institution, the overall complication rate is 6.1% with 114 total patients. All complications between both papers are considered minor with no long-term effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, BDET is shown to be a relatively safe procedure when performed in the pediatric population. Upon review of the literature, this is the largest safety analysis of exclusively pediatric patients who underwent BDET.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Eustachian Tube Dilation Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether balloon dilation of Eustachian tube (BDET) improves postoperative audiology and quality of life scores in children with chronic Eustachian tube dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric center.

METHODS

Eligible participants were patients 8 years or older, with a history of 2 prior tubes placement. Group 1-patients completed pre-and post-Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Quality of Life Survey (ETDQ-7) survey scores, Group 2-patients had available pre- and postdilation tympanogram data (TD), and Group 3-patients had both ETDQ-7 survey and TD. The average time for the first and subsequent follow-ups was 3.8 and 12.9 months, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients (85 ears) underwent BDET. The mean age was 13.3 years (8-18 years). Twenty-four patients were male (55.8%) and over 80% were Caucasian. The average mean ETDQ-7 score before and after dilation was 3.9 and 2.5, respectively. Ninety-three percent experienced improvement of their postoperative ETDQ-7 scores and 53% had normal postdilation ETDQ-7 score (P < .0001). Thirty-seven ears in Group 2 (60.7%) had improvement in postdilation TD. A greater proportion of ears showed improvement of 62.3% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) [50.1%-74.5%] compared to 37.7% without improvement, 95% CI [25.5%-49.87%]. Ears with type A or B TD were more likely to show improvement than ears with type C, perforated, or with tubes (P < .0001). Eighteen out of 30 ears in Group 3 (60%) experienced an improvement in both ETDQ-7 and tympanogram.

CONCLUSION

BDET is a safe, efficacious alternative to tubes in selected pediatric patients.

Outcomes of Concurrent Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty and Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children

OBJECTIVES

Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty (BDET) has been proven to be a safe treatment option for children with eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). This study aims to analyze the long-term outcomes of children who underwent concurrent BDET and tympanostomy tube (TT) placement. We hypothesize that patients who underwent simultaneous therapy have experienced a low overall rate of middle ear pathology and have consistent hearing quality at subsequent office visits.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 19 pediatric patients (36 ears) who previously underwent concurrent BDET and TT placement. Patient charts within the extended postoperative period were reviewed. Specific data points included need for reoperation, rates of middle ear pathology, audiological outcomes, and number of previous TT placements.

RESULTS

Pediatric patients who underwent concurrent BDET and TT placement had long-term success in 34/36 ears (94.4%). All postoperative tympanograms and audiograms (100%) were normal when performed within 12 months after the procedure. Notably, 34/36 ears (94.4%) had history of tube placement in the past. Patients had an average of three sets of tympanostomy tubes prior to undergoing concurrent BDET and TT.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent BDET and TT placement may be an effective treatment option for pediatric patients with persistent eustachian tube dysfunction. Specifically, BDET may be a useful adjunct tool in pediatric patients with refractory ETD despite having multiple sets of tympanostomy tubes. This study aims to strengthen the argument of performing multimodal therapy in pediatric patients with recurrent middle ear disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:4799-4802, 2024.

A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Objective Performance Criteria-Controlled Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Double-Lumen Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter

BACKGROUND

To prospectively evaluate the technical efficacy and safety of the double-lumen eustachian tube (ET) balloon catheter in patients with ET dysfunction.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with ET dysfunction and needed balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) were prospectively enrolled. A double-lumen ET balloon catheter was used to dilate the ET and inject medicine. Efficacy results were assessed by the injection channel patency (ICP) rate, the injection reached the expected site (IRES) rate, and the improvement in eustachian tube function was evaluated by the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) score. Safety results were assessed in terms of adverse events and device defects.

RESULTS

BET was successfully attempted in 87 patients from April 2022 to August 2022 at two academic medical centers in China (01, 02). The ICP rate was 100%, and the IRES rate was 88.51%. The overall ETDQ-7 score was significantly reduced ( p < 0.001) postsurgically at both centers. There were no major complications or device defects.

CONCLUSION

The double-lumen ET balloon catheter is technically effective and safe for the treatment of ET dysfunction.

The case for balloon eustachian tuboplasty in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Balloon dilation of the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube has increasingly gained acceptance among otolaryngologists in the treatment of obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction. There is however little data on the procedure performed in children. The purpose of this study is to review the recent developments regarding balloon dilation in pediatric patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube is safe in pediatric patients. The effects of the procedure are durable during long term follow-up. Diagnosing obstructive dysfunction remains challenging. There is no single test or questionnaire for diagnosing the condition; instead a series of appropriate tests should be used. The pediatric Eustachian tube is very responsive to the effects of balloon dilation. While the treatment is effective, overtreatment can have unwanted results such as patulous symptoms. Reducing the time of dilation should therefore be considered.

SUMMARY

Otolaryngologists performing the procedure should be familiar with the effects of balloon dilation on the pediatric Eustachian tube and consider altering the duration of dilation accordingly. Further studies are needed especially regarding patient selection, optimal age for dilation and balloon parameters for pediatrics (e.g. dimensions, inflation duration, inflation pressure).

Informed consent in balloon Eustachian tuboplasty: a systematic review of possible complications and preventive measures

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify the complications associated with balloon Eustachian tuboplasty and their frequency of occurrence. This study will also highlight the measures that can be employed to avoid these complications and perform this procedure more safely.

METHODS

Systematically reviewed relevant papers published until January 2023. Each reference was checked and evaluated for any potential manuscripts. There was no registered protocol; the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine publications were found, from which 14 publications met our inclusion criteria: 2 randomised clinical trials, 5 retrospective studies, 2 systematic reviews, 2 case series and 3 case reports. Studies with balloon Eustachian tuboplasty procedure only were included, regardless of ethnicity, gender and age. All studies were excluded in which more than one procedure was performed.

CONCLUSION

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty is a relatively safe procedure with an overall complication risk of 1.66 per cent. Major complication rate was 0.43 per cent. Surgical emphysema was the most common, around 0.40 per cent.

Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty-A Feasible Double-Blinded Sham Surgery Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol to Study Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is used to treat obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) and recurrent otitis media with effusion (OME). However, there are no indisputable evidence of its efficacy. Here, we present a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MDRCT) design to evaluate the efficacy of BET, and the results of a pilot trial with 3- and 12-months' follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective MDRCT. For a pilot study, OETD (n = 10) and OME (n = 5) patients were recruited and followed. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Participants were randomized at beginning of the operation to active or sham surgery. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia. Controls were performed in double-blinded manner (both patient and physician), at 3 and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Altogether, 20 ears were treated and followed for 12 months, including 14 active BETs and 6 sham surgeries. Both the active and sham surgery were performed under local anesthesia without problems or deviations from the protocol. There were no differences in the preoperative symptoms (ETDQ-7) or objective measures (tympanometry, Valsalva and Toynbee maneuvers, tubomanometry, Eustachian tube score) between active and sham surgery arms. During follow-up, we noticed largely similar reduction in subjective symptoms and improvement in Eustachian tube score both in active and sham surgery arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study demonstrates that our MDRCT protocol is feasible, and that blinded RCTs are dearly needed to objectively measure the efficacy of BET.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:1874-1881, 2024.

Dilatation Eustachian tuboplasty with a Eustachian tube video endoscope and supporting balloon

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of employing a Eustachian tube video endoscope with a supporting balloon as a viable treatment and examination option for patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction.

METHODS

A study involving nine fresh human cadaver heads was conducted to investigate the potential of balloon dilatation Eustachian tuboplasty using a Eustachian tube video endoscope and a supporting balloon catheter. The Eustachian tube cavity was examined with the Eustachian tube video endoscope during the procedure, which involved the dilatation of the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube with the supporting balloon catheter.

RESULTS

The utilisation of the Eustachian tube video endoscope in conjunction with the supporting balloon catheter demonstrated technical ease during the procedure, with no observed damage to essential structures, particularly the Eustachian tube cavity.

CONCLUSION

This newly introduced method of dilatation and examination of the Eustachian tube cavity using a Eustachian tube video endoscope and the supporting balloon is a feasible, safe procedure.

Delayed extensive surgical emphysema after Valsalva manoeuvre post Eustachian tuboplasty

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports a case of balloon Eustachian tuboplasty with delayed presentation of extensive surgical emphysema.

METHODS

This is a clinical case report with a review of literature.

RESULTS

Eustachian tube dysfunction is a functional disorder that results in inadequate middle-ear ventilation, causing aural fullness and tinnitus. A 36-year-old male presented with the sudden onset of an isolated, painful, left-sided neck swelling. The patient underwent balloon Eustachian tuboplasty, which was uneventful, but subsequently developed a sudden onset of isolated left-sided neck swelling on the 5th post-operative day during Valsalva manoeuvre. Neck examination revealed extensive crepitus on the left side of the neck. Examination findings were confirmed by imaging. The patient was conservatively managed and subsequently discharged home.

CONCLUSION

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty is a safe procedure; however, extra care must be taken to avoid possible complications. Patients should be counselled against Valsalva manoeuvre and heavy weightlifting. They also should be instructed to sneeze with an open mouth and consider the use of stool softeners.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty Combined With Ventilation Tubes Insertion in Children: A Retrospective Study

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) combined with ventilation tube (VT) insertion in pediatric population and to identify the predictive factors for symptom recurrence. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study between August 2018 and February 2022 at Shenzhen Children's Hospital. The study analyzed the data of pediatric patients who underwent BET + VT insertion, as well as the data of pediatric patients who underwent VT insertion alone. The outcomes were efficacy, safety, and predictive factors of BET combined with VT. Kaplan‒Meier curves were used to examine the failure-free survival rate. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of BET failure. Results: We evaluated the data of 29 pediatric patients (48 ears) who underwent BET with VT insertion (BET + VT group) and the data of 29 pediatric patients (46 ears) who underwent VT insertion alone (VT group). The total effectiveness rates at the first follow-up after VT removal and at 12 months in the BET + VT group were 90.9% and 84.6%, respectively. The decrease in the air-bone gap (ABG) was more significant in the BET + VT group at 12 months (13.7 ± 10.8 vs 6.4 ± 15.3, P < .05). The subgroup analyses did not show any significant difference between the groups in high-risk. For non-high-risk patients, the decrease in the ABG was more significant in the BET + VT group (14.2 ± 10.6 vs 4.3 ± 13.1, P < .05) at 12 months. The multivariate analysis showed that a history of VT insertion was independently associated with a higher rate of recurrence in the BET + VT group (hazard ratio 3.177; 95% CI, 1.027-9.826; P < .05). Conclusions: BET + VT insertion is an effective procedure to decrease the ABG in pediatric patients with eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) who have no risk factors for conventional therapy failure. Treatment of patients with ETDs who have coexisting risk factors remains a challenge that warrants further high-quality prospective research.

The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Children: Anatomical Considerations and Current Trends in Invasive Therapeutic Approaches

The eustachian tube (ET) has a crucial role in the physiology of the middle ear. Thus, any condition that renders the tube dysfunctional is directly implicated with middle ear pathophysiology, like in the case of acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion. Children are more vulnerable to pathologies of the middle ear, primarily due to the immature development of their eustachian tubes. Otitis media with effusion, apart from being a burden for hearing, with direct consequences for speech development, may also be implicated in cholesteatoma formation. Medical therapy is not practically effective for the treatment of effusion. Moreover, the established surgical approaches, like grommets and adenoidectomy, deal only indirectly with the problem since they are not addressing the dysfunctional ET itself. An emerging interventional approach that intends to restore the function of the tube is the transnasal balloon dilation of the cartilaginous part of the ET. Growing international experience indicates that this promising technique is safe and effective. In the current review, we aim to provide background information on the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the ET and to present the progress of the balloon dilation technique with emphasis on pediatric patients.

Outcome of Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation in Children: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a chronic entity that has been historically managed with adenoidectomy and ventilation tube insertion. Recently, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube has shown promising results in recalcitrant eustachian tube dysfunction. We reviewed the literature to determine the outcome of eustachian tube balloon dilation in children.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for the period from 1990 to 2020 by searching several databases over a 1-month period (January 2021) according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews for Interventions. Primary outcome was defined as the success of the intervention determined by the resolution of symptoms, and secondary outcome was determined by revisions surgery and presence of complications.

RESULTS

Only 7 articles were identified based on our objectives and selection criteria. All studies included are retrospective cohort case series (Level IV) and 1 cohort of matched controls (Level III). A total of 284 patients were included in this review, with a mean age of 7.8 years. A total of 463 balloon dilation were performed either bilaterally or unilaterally. The most common finding of ETD is middle ear effusion in 5 studies. Balloon dilation of eustachian tube was second-line treatment in 6 studies and first-line treatment in 1 study. Improvement of symptoms was identified in all studies through various assessments performed. Revision surgery was performed in 1 study with no major complications reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon dilation of the eustachian tube may be considered as an alternative procedure following failed standard treatment in children. The quality of evidence is inadequate to recommend widespread use of the technique until a better-quality study has been completed. Future randomized controlled studies with a large sample size are warranted to determine the efficacy of this procedure amongst children.