An equity-based narrative review of barriers to timely postoperative radiation therapy for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Assessing barriers to adjuvant therapy among patients with head and neck cancer in Arkansas

Advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) requires multimodal treatment and in the setting of primary curative intent surgery, adjuvant radiation with pathology-based chemotherapy is necessary for best outcomes. HNC treatment guidelines and best evidence support adjuvant radiation initiated within 6 weeks of surgery [1]. Over half of HNC patients face obstacles delaying adjuvant therapy, especially in rural areas [2]. This study assesses barriers to timely adjuvant therapy, specifically radiation in a rural tertiary setting. The study conducted was a retrospective mixed-methods analysis. The initial cohort consists of patients referred for adjuvant radiation therapy after curative intent head and neck surgery at a tertiary referral center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, between 2020 and 2022. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected and analyzed. Inclusion criteria for the study: patients referred for adjuvant therapy facing delays in treatment (> than 6 weeks) or deferring adjuvant treatment altogether. These patients and/or proxies were surveyed via telephone. Contact was made with 28 of the 46 patients meeting inclusion. 7 declined participation; 21 patients completed the survey personally, by proxy, or via family member. Among the respondents, the primary reasons for delaying adjuvant therapy include travel requirements/distance, general medical health, and financial constraints, with travel requirements/distance rated as the highest concern. Numerous obstacles to timely adjuvant therapy exist within our patient population. Understanding these barriers is crucial for improving timely access to adjuvant therapy and ultimately enhancing patient survivorship. Through individualized risk assessment, patient education, and resource management, we anticipate mitigating barriers to adjuvant therapy.

Implementation Mapping to Identify Strategies to Increase Timely Postoperative Radiotherapy Initiation for Head/Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Timely initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with improved survival, but rates of timely PORT initiation are low. To support uptake in a tertiary academic center, we aimed to identify implementation determinants (eg, barriers and facilitators) to timely PORT initiation and to design context-specific implementation strategies.

METHODS

We created an implementation blueprint through a sequential mixed-methods study where we (1) identified determinants by fielding a 15-item survey based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), (2) prioritized determinants through focus groups with relevant stakeholders, (3) mapped barriers to implementation strategies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool, and (4) operationalized strategies using the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework.

RESULTS

Twenty-three participants from three departments (61% Radiation Oncology, 35% Otolaryngology, 4% Medical Oncology) in a variety of roles (35% physicians, 39% nurses or advanced practice providers, 22% radiation therapists or dosimetrists, and 4% research coordinators) completed surveys. Participants identified 10 determinants affecting timely PORT initiation. After strategy selection and operationalization by focus group participants (n = 13), three ERIC strategies were selected for clinical implementation: remind clinicians, conduct educational meetings, and facilitate relay of clinical data to providers.

DISCUSSION

This work developed a menu of implementation strategies for future deployment to support timely PORT initiation. Codesign centered the voice of frontline workers, increasing the likelihood of successful implementation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The systematic approaches to development can serve as a model for process improvement in other contexts.

Reducing Length of Stay in Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a new preoperative education and discharge planning protocol reduced unexpected discharge delays for patients undergoing reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

A quality improvement (QI) intervention was implemented in January 2021 with several components to address historically prolonged observed lengths of stay (LOS) with head and neck cancer patients. The intervention added a preoperative educational visit with a head and neck cancer advanced practice provider, a standardized preoperative speech and swallow assessment, a personalized patient care plan document, discussion of inpatient hospital stay expectations, and early discharge planning. The intervention group included patients who underwent the preoperative education protocol from February to December 2021. For comparison, an age and sex-matched control group was constructed from inpatients who had been admitted for similar procedures in the 2 years prior to the QI intervention (2019-2020) and received standard of care counseling.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrated a significant reduction in observed to expected LOS ratio after implementation of the intervention (1.24 ± 0.74 control, 0.95 ± 0.52 intervention; P = .012).

DISCUSSION

We discuss a preoperative education QI intervention at our institution. Our findings demonstrate that our intervention was associated with decreased LOS for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This QI study shows the benefit of a new standardized preoperative education and discharge planning protocol for patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive surgeries.

Factors Associated with Head and Neck Cancer Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clincal Practice Guidelines and is a Commission on Cancer quality metric. Factors associated with delays in starting PORT have not been systematically described nor synthesized.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

We included studies describing demographic characteristics, clinical factors, or social determinants of health associated with PORT delay (>6 weeks) in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003. Meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) was performed on nonoverlapping datasets.

RESULTS

Of 716 unique abstracts reviewed, 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 15 in the meta-analysis. Study sample size ranged from 19 to 60,776 patients. In the meta-analysis, factors associated with PORT delay included black race (OR, 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.67), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.17-1.60), Medicaid or no health insurance (OR, 2.01, 95% CI, 1.90-2.13), lower income (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.20-1.59), postoperative admission >7 days (OR, 2.92, 95% CI, 2.31-3.67), and 30-day hospital readmission (OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

Patients at greatest risk for a delay in initiating guideline-adherent PORT include those who are from minoritized communities, of lower socioeconomic status, and experience postoperative challenges. These findings provide the foundational evidence needed to deliver targeted interventions to enhance equity and quality in HNSCC care delivery.

Disparities in Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

This article examines disparities in head and neck cancer across the cancer care continuum. It provides a public health lens to understand multilevel determinants of health behavior and the importance of social determinants of health. This article reviews the evidence base showing profound differences in incidence, treatment, and survival for patients with head and neck cancer by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography. Continued research is needed to understand and address disparities for patients with head and neck cancer.

Factors Contributing to Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays in Head and Neck Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Head and neck cancer encompasses a diverse group of malignancies that pose significant challenges in their management due to their heterogeneity in clinical behavior and treatment response. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is a critical component in the treatment regimen for head and neck cancer, aimed at reducing local recurrence and improving overall survival (OS). However, delays in the initiation of PORT can significantly compromise patient outcomes. This comprehensive review explores the factors contributing to such delays, categorizing them into patient-related, treatment-related, and systemic factors. Patient-related factors include health status, comorbidities, socioeconomic barriers, and psychological issues. Treatment-related factors involve surgical complications, complexities in treatment planning, and coordination challenges between surgical and radiation oncology teams. Systemic and institutional factors encompass hospital resources, staffing levels, administrative and insurance issues, and geographic barriers. The review also examined the impact of these delays on patient outcomes, highlighting the increased risk of recurrence and reduced survival rates. Strategies to mitigate delays are discussed, including improved preoperative and postoperative planning, enhanced multidisciplinary coordination, patient education, and systemic policy changes. Additionally, case studies and real-world examples of successful interventions are presented. Future directions for research and policy recommendations are also outlined, emphasizing the need for continued efforts to ensure timely PORT for head and neck cancer patients. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis that can inform clinical practice and policy, ultimately improving the standard of care and patient outcomes in head and neck cancer treatment.

Association Between Time From Surgery to Radiation Therapy and Multimodality Treatment Outcomes in HPV+ Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Experience

Purpose

Oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCCs) are traditionally managed with surgery and, if indicated, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy. NCCN recommends keeping the time from surgery to the start of RT (TSRT) within 6 weeks to avoid possibly compromising patient outcomes. HPV+ OPSCCs behave more favorably than HPV- OPSCCs. We hypothesized that TSRT beyond 6 weeks may not portend poorer outcomes for the former.

Methods

We identified nonmetastatic, high-risk HPV+ OPSCCs treated with multimodal therapy at 2 institutions. Prolonged TSRT was defined as >6 weeks and was evaluated for association with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Radiation treatment time (RTT; time from the first to the last day of RT), total treatment package time (TTPT; time from surgery to the end of adjuvant treatments), de-escalated RT (dose ≤56 Gy), concurrent chemotherapy, smoking history, and treatment institution were evaluated as possible confounders.

Results

In total, 96 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 62 months (4-123 months); 69 patients underwent transoral robotic surgeries, and 27 received open surgeries. The median postoperative RT dose was 60 Gy (50-70.8 Gy). The median TSRT, RTT, and TTPT were 38 days (11-208), 43 days (26-56 days), and 81 days (40-255 days), respectively. Ten patients failed treatment at a median of 8 months (4-64 months). Two locoregional and 4 distant failures occurred in the group without prolonged TSRT, whereas 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures were recorded in the prolonged TSRT group. Prolonged TTPT, de-escalated RT, chemotherapy, smoking history, and treatment institution were not associated with treatment failure. RTT was dropped from our analyses as no events appeared in the prolonged RTT group, and no reliable hazard ratio could be computed.

Conclusions

TSRT > 6 weeks was not significantly associated with inferior outcomes in the postoperative management of HPV+ OPSCCs. Longer TSRT may facilitate better recovery from surgical toxicity, as needed, without compromising oncologic outcomes. The TSRT goal for these cancers should be investigated in future studies.

Racial Disparities in Head and Neck Cancer: It's Not Just About Access

OBJECTIVE

Medical literature identifies stark racial disparities in head and neck cancer (HNC) in the United States, primarily between non-Hispanic white (NHW) and non-Hispanic black (NHB) populations. The etiology of this disparity is often attributed to inequitable access to health care and socioeconomic status (SES). However, other contributors have been reported. We performed a systematic review to better understand the multifactorial landscape driving racial disparities in HNC.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted in Covidence following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Guidelines. A search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for literature published through November 2022 evaluating racial disparities in HNC identified 2309 publications.

REVIEW METHODS

Full texts were screened by 2 authors independently, and inconsistencies were resolved by consensus. Three hundred forty publications were ultimately selected and categorized into themes including disparities in access/SES, treatment, lifestyle, and biology. Racial groups examined included NHB and NHW patients but also included Hispanic, Native American, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients to a lesser extent.

RESULTS

Of the 340 articles, 192 focused on themes of access/SES, including access to high-quality hospitals, insurance coverage, and transportation contributing to disparate HNC outcomes. Additional themes discussed in 148 articles included incongruities in surgical recommendations, tobacco/alcohol use, human papillomavirus-associated malignancies, and race-informed silencing of tumor suppressor genes.

CONCLUSION

Differential access to care plays a significant role in racial disparities in HNC, disproportionately affecting NHB populations. However, there are other significant themes driving racial disparities. Future studies should focus on providing equitable access to care while also addressing these additional sources of disparities in HNC.

Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT.

DATA SOURCES

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.

Timely delivery of PORT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a county hospital

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) initiation within 6 weeks for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated at a safety net, academic institutio between 2019 and 2021 versus those treated in 2022 after implementation of a new clinical pathway.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was performed at a single tertiary care, safety-net, academic institution. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, dates of surgery, and other treatment dates were collected from the electronic medical record. The time from surgery to PORT was calculated. Patients who started radiation treatment within 42 days of surgery were regarded as having started PORT on time. The demographics, tumor characteristics, and rate of timely PORT for the two cohorts of patients were compared.

Results

From 2018 to 2021, our rate of PORT initiation within 6 weeks of surgery was 12% (n = 57). In 2022, our rate of timely PORT was 88% (n = 16), p < 0.5. Patient demographics and characteristics were similar with the exception of marital status and use of free-flap reconstruction. The 2022 cohort was more likely to be single (p < 0.5), and all patients underwent free-flap reconstruction in 2022 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early referrals, frequent communication, and use of a secure registry were the key to the success found by our group despite the socioeconomic challenges of our underserved, safety-net hospital patient population. The changes made at our institution should serve as a template for other institutions seeking to improve the quality of care for their HNSCC patients.

Racial disparities in the timely receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of socioeconomic and demographic factors which might predict for excessive delays in the receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of 430 consecutive patients referred for adjuvant radiation after surgical resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were reviewed. The number of days from surgery to initiation of radiation was recorded. To study the variability in which adjuvant radiation was delivered, descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of patients who deviated from starting treatment beyond the recommended benchmark of 42 days. The chi-square statistic was used to compare differences in proportion among subsets. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to perform a multi-variate analysis to identify factors which independently influenced the likelihood for non-adherence.

RESULTS

The interval between surgery and the start of radiation therapy ranged from 5 to 128 days (mean, 36 days). The mean number of days from surgery to radiation therapy was 31 days, 35 days, 40 days, and 42 days for Caucasians, Asians, Latino, and Black patients (p = 0.01). In all, 359 of 430 patients (83 %) started adjuvant radiation within 42 days. The proportion of patients who initiated radiation therapy within 42 days of surgery was 91 %, 86 %, 71 %, 65 %, and 80 % for Caucasians, Asians, Latinos, Blacks, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders, respectively (p < 0.001). Patient characteristics associated with higher odds of non-adherence to the timely receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy within then 42-day benchmark from surgery to radiation included race ([OR] = 4.23 95 % CI (1.30-7.97), non-English speaking status ([OR] = 2.38, 95 % CI: 0.61-4.50), and low socioeconomic status ([OR] = 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.86).

CONCLUSION

Underrepresented minorities are more likely to experience delays in the receipt of adjuvant radiation for head and neck cancer. The potential underlying reasons are discussed.

Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC.

RESULTS

Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.

Discharge Disposition After Head and Neck Reconstruction: Effect on Adjuvant Therapy and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Head and neck cancer patients that require major reconstruction often have advanced-stage disease. Discharge disposition of patients can vary and impact time to adjuvant treatment. We sought to examine outcomes in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) compared to those discharged home, including the impact on adjuvant therapy initiation and treatment package time (TPT).

METHODS

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgical resection and microvascular free flap reconstruction from 2019 to 2022 were included. Retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the impact of disposition on time to radiation (RT) and TPT.

RESULTS

230 patients were included, with 165 (71.7%) discharged to home and 65 (28.3%) discharged to SNF. 79.1% of patients were recommended adjuvant therapy. Average time to RT was 59 days for patients discharged to home compared to 70.1 days for patients discharged to SNF. Disposition was an independent risk factor for delays to starting RT (p = 0.03). TPT was 101.7 days for patients discharged to home versus 112.3 days for those who discharged to SNF. Patients discharged to SNF had higher rates of readmission (p < 0.005) compared to patients discharged home in an adjusted multivariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients discharged to an SNF had significantly delayed time to initiation of adjuvant treatment and higher rates of readmission. Timeliness to adjuvant treatment has recently been established as a quality measure, thus identifying delays to adjuvant treatment initiation should be a priority.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2977-2983, 2023.

Update on adherence to guidelines for time to initiation of postoperative radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A prior study reported that over half of patients with HNSCC initiated PORT after 6 weeks from surgery during 2006-2014. In 2022, the CoC released a quality metric for patients to initiate PORT within 6 weeks. This study provides an update on time to PORT in recent years.

METHODS

The NCDB and TriNetX Research Network were queried to identify patients with HNSCC who received PORT during 2015-2019 and 2015-2021, respectively. Treatment delay was defined as initiating PORT beyond 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

In NCDB, PORT was delayed for 62% of patients. Predictors of delay included age >50, female sex, black race, nonprivate insurance/uninsured status, lower education, oral cavity site, negative surgical margins, increased postoperative length of stay, unplanned hospital readmissions, IMRT radiation modality, treatment at an academic hospital or in the Northeast, and surgery and radiation at different facilities. In TriNetX, 64% experienced treatment delay. Additional associations with prolonged time to treatment included never married/divorced/widowed marital status, major surgery (neck dissection/free flaps/laryngectomy), and gastrostomy/tracheostomy dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

There continue to be challenges to timely initiation of PORT.

Association of Social-Ecological Factors With Delay in Time to Initiation of Postoperative Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Importance

Timely initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Measurement of the association of social-ecological variables with PORT delays is lacking.

Objective

To assess individual and community-level factors associated with PORT delay among patients with HNSCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study carried out between September 2018 and June 2022 included adults with untreated HNSCC who were enrolled in a prospective registry at a single academic tertiary medical center. Demographic information and validated self-reported measures of health literacy were obtained at baseline visits. Clinical data were recorded, and participant addresses were used to calculate the area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of community-level social vulnerability. Participants receiving primary surgery and PORT were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PORT delays.

Exposures

Surgical treatment and PORT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was PORT initiation delay (>42 days from surgery). Risk of PORT initiation delay was evaluated using individual-level (demographic, health literacy, and clinical data) and community-level information (ADI and rural-urban continuum codes).

Results

Of 171 patients, 104 patients (60.8%) had PORT delays. Mean (SD) age of participants was 61.0 (11.2) years, 161 were White (94.2%), and 105 were men (61.4%). Insurance was employer-based or public among 65 (38.5%) and 75 (44.4%) participants, respectively. Mean (SD) ADI (national percentile) was 60.2 (24.4), and 71 (41.8%) resided in rural communities. Tumor sites were most commonly oral cavity (123 [71.9%]), with 108 (63.5%) classified as stage 4 at presentation. On multivariable analysis, a model incorporating individual-level factors with health literacy in addition to community-level factors was most predictive of PORT delay (AOC= 0.78; R2, 0.18).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study provides a more comprehensive assessment of predictors of PORT delays that include health literacy and community-level measures. Predictive models that incorporate multilevel measures outperform models with individual-level factors alone and may guide precise interventions to decrease PORT delay for at-risk patients with HNSCC.

Racial survival disparities in head and neck cancer clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Survival disparities between Black and White head and neck cancer patients are well documented, with access to care and socioeconomic status as major contributors. We set out to assess the role of self-reported race in head and neck cancer by evaluating treatment outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trials, where access to care and socioeconomic status confounders are minimized.

METHODS

Clinical trial data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies were obtained. Studies were included if they were therapeutic trials that employed survival as an endpoint. Studies that did not report survival as an endpoint were excluded; 7 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Studies were included for study. For each Black patient enrolled in a clinical trial, a study arm-matched White patient was used as a control.

RESULTS

A total of 468 Black participants were identified and matched with 468 White study arm-specific controls. White participants had better outcomes than Black participants in 60% of matched pairs (P < .001). Black participants were consistently more likely to have worse outcomes. When outcomes were measured by progression-free survival or disease-free survival, the failure rate was statistically significantly higher in Black participants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, P < .001). Failure was largely due to locoregional failure, and Black participants were at higher risk (subdistribution HR =1.51, P = .002). The development of distant metastasis within the paired cohorts was not statistically significantly different.

CONCLUSION

In this study of clinical trial participants using self-reported race, Black participants consistently had worse outcomes in comparison to study arm-specific White controls. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and to explore causes underlying this disparity.