Pathophysiological effects of albumin dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a randomized controlled study

Extracorporeal liver support systems in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of extracorporeal liver support systems is increasingly prevalent for the management of acute-on-chronic liver failure in clinical settings. Yet, the efficacy of these interventions in terms of tangible clinical benefits for patients remains a matter of debate, underscoring the need for meta-analysis.

METHODS

An updated meta-analysis was performed to elucidate the relationship between the application of extracorporeal liver support versus standard pharmacological treatment and the prognostic endpoints of patient survival, specifically assessing 1-month and 3-month mortality rates, as well as the incidence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome. Literature were searched via PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis revealed the following: the odds ratio for 1-month mortality was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CIs]: 0.51-0.76), for 3-month mortality was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61-0.81), for hepatic encephalopathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67-0.97), for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.44-0.99), and for hepatorenal syndrome was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.92). These results suggest that patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure undergoing extracorporeal liver support system therapy have significantly better survival rates and lower complication incidences compared to those receiving conventional drug therapy. Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and reduced total bilirubin (Tbil) levels demonstrated greater benefits from extracorporeal hepatic support.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes that in the management of acute-on-chronic liver failure, extracorporeal liver support systems confer a survival advantage and reduce complications relative to standard pharmacotherapy.

Extracorporeal liver support and liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined by acute decompensation, organ failure and a high risk of short-term mortality. This condition is characterized by an overwhelming systemic inflammatory response. Despite treating the precipitating event, intensive monitoring and organ support, clinical deterioration can occur with very poor outcomes. During the last decades, several extracorporeal liver support systems have been developed to try to reduce ongoing liver injury and provide an improved environment for the liver to regenerate or as a bridging therapy until liver transplantation. Several clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal liver support systems, but no clear impact on survival has been proven. DIALIVE is a novel extracorporeal liver support device that has been built to specifically address the pathophysiological derangements responsible for the development of ACLF by replacing dysfunctional albumin and removing pathogen and damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs). In phase II clinical trial, DIALIVE appears to be safe, and it seems to be associated with a faster time to the resolution of ACLF compared with standard medical treatment. Even in patients with severe ACLF, liver transplantation saves lives and there is clear evidence of transplant benefit. Careful selection of patients is required to attain good results from liver transplantation, but many questions remain unanswered. In this review, we describe the current perspectives on the use of extracorporeal liver support and liver transplantation for ACLF patients.

Associations between maternal serum phytoestrogens and liver function markers: a cross-sectional study from China

Phytoestrogens (PEs) may harm liver function. However, studies in pregnant women are limited. Our study was conducted in pregnant women to assess the effect of serum PEs on liver function markers. We conducted a cross-sectional study focusing in the first trimester of pregnancy. A total of 352 pregnant women were enrolled in the study. We used generalized linear model (GLM) to explore the associations between each PE and each marker of liver function. We used Quantile g-computation (Qgcomp) and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) models to explore the associations between mixed exposure to all PEs and liver function markers. The GLM results showed that equol (EQU), daidzein (DAD), genistein (GEN), enterolactone (ENT), and enterodiol (END) were negatively correlated with albumin (ALB). DAD and GEN were associated with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). DAD, GEN, naringin (NAR), and glycitein (GLY) were related to elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Mixed exposure model results showed that the mixture of PEs was associated with reduced ALB. Our results support the existence of associations between PEs and maternal liver function in the first trimester. Emphasizing the detrimental associations between serum PEs and liver function in pregnant women is essential to ensure maternal liver health during pregnancy.

Efficacy of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) mostly occurs when there is an acute insult to the liver in patients with pre-existing liver disease, and it is characterized by a high mortality rate. Various therapeutic approaches have been used thus far, with orthotopic liver transplantation being the only definitive cure. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells. Some studies have suggested that G-CSF may have a significant role in the management and survival of patients with ACLF. However, the results are conflicting, and the efficacy of G-CSF still needs to be confirmed.

AIM

The aim was to assess the efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ACLF.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched until May 2023 for randomized controlled trials investigating the use of G-CSF in adult patients with ACLF. Outcome measures were the effects of G-CSF on overall survival, changes in liver disease severity scores, complications of cirrhosis, other G-CSF-related adverse effects, and all-cause mortality. The study's protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023420273).

RESULTS

Five double-blind randomized controlled trials involving a total of 421 participants met the inclusion criteria. The use of G-CSF demonstrated a significant effect on overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, and I2 48%), leading to a decreased mortality (LogOR-0.97, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.37, and I2 37.6%) and improved Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.13, and I2 87.3%). There was no correlation between the improvement of the Child-Pugh score and the use of G-CSF(SMD -2.47, 95% CI -5.78 to 0.83, and I2 98.1%). The incidence of complications of cirrhosis did not decrease significantly with G-CSF treatment (rate ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01, and I2 90%). A qualitative synthesis showed that the use of G-CSF is safe.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of G-CSF has demonstrated a positive impact on overall survival, liver function, and the MELD score. The presence of heterogeneity in the included studies prohibits conclusive recommendations.

Review article: Emerging and current management of acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinically and pathophysiologically distinct condition from acutely decompensated cirrhosis and is characterised by systemic inflammation, extrahepatic organ failure, and high short-term mortality.

AIMS

To provide a narrative review of the diagnostic criteria, prognosis, epidemiology, and general management principles of ACLF. Four specific interventions that are explored in detail are intravenous albumin, extracorporeal liver assist devices, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, and liver transplantation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published up to July 2023.

RESULTS

Approximately 35% of hospital inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis have ACLF. There is significant heterogeneity in the criteria used to diagnose ACLF; different definitions identify different phenotypes with varying mortality. Criteria established by the European Association for the Study of the Liver were developed in prospective patient cohorts and are, to-date, the most well validated internationally. Systemic haemodynamic instability, renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, neurological dysfunction, and respiratory failure are key considerations when managing ACLF in the intensive care unit. Apart from liver transplantation, there are no accepted evidence-based treatments for ACLF, but several different approaches are under investigation.

CONCLUSION

The recognition of ACLF as a distinct entity from acutely decompensated cirrhosis has allowed for better patient stratification in clinical settings, facilitating earlier engagement with the intensive care unit and liver transplantation teams. Research priorities over the next decade should focus on exploring novel treatment strategies with a particular focus on which, when, and how patients with ACLF should be treated.

High Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index, Predicting Early Allograft Dysfunction, Indicates High 90-Day Mortality for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure after Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and 90-day mortality after liver transplantation (LT) in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

Retrospective record analysis was done on 114 patients who had LT for ACLF. To identify the ideal SII, the receiver operating characteristic curve was used. The incidence of EAD and 90-day mortality following LT were calculated. The prognostic value of SII was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier technique and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The cut-off for SII was 201.5 (AUC = 0.728, p < 0.001). EAD occurred in 40 (35.1%) patients of the high SII group and 5 (4.4%) patients of the normal SII group, p < 0.001. 18 (15.8%) deaths occurred in the high SII group and 2 (1.8%) deaths occurred in the normal SII group, p = 0.008. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that SII ≥201.5, MELD ≥27 were independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality after LT.

CONCLUSION

SII predicts the occurrence of EAD and is an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality after LT.

Artificial Liver Support with CytoSorb and MARS in Liver Failure: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Analysis

Background: Liver failure represents a life-threatening organ dysfunction with liver transplantation as the only proven curable therapy to date. Liver assist devices have been extensively researched to either bridge such patients to transplantation or promote spontaneous recovery. The aim of our study was to compare two such devices, the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and CytoSorb, in patients with liver failure. Methods: We retrospectively included 15 patients who underwent MARS during their intensive care unit stay and matched them to 15 patients who underwent hemoadsorption using CytoSorb. Clinical and paraclinical data obtained after each individual session, after the course of treatment, as well as at the end of the intensive care unit stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Single sessions of CytoSorb and MARS were both associated with a significant decrease in bilirubin (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04, respectively) and ammonia levels (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04, respectively), but only CytoSorb therapy was associated with a decrease in lactate dehydrogenase levels (p = 0.04) and in platelet count (p = 0.04). After the course of treatment, only CytoSorb was associated with a significant decrease in lactate (p = 0.01), bilirubin (p = 0.01), ammonia (p = 0.02), and lactate dehydrogenase levels (p = 0.01), while patients treated with MARS did not show any improvement in paraclinical liver tests. In addition, only CytoSorb treatment was associated with a significant improvement in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score (p = 0.04). Conclusion: In conclusion, our results show a potential benefit of CytoSorb in rebalancing liver functional tests in patients with liver failure compared to MARS but the exact effects on patient outcome, including hospital length of stay and survival, should be further investigated in randomized control trials.

Adverse events, short- and long-term outcomes of extra corporeal liver therapy in the intensive care unit: 16 years experience with MARS® in a single center

Background

Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS®) is a non-biological artificial liver device. The benefit risk ratio between uncertain clinical effects and potential adverse events remains difficult to assess. We sought to describe adverse events related to MARS® therapy as well as biological and clinical effects.

Methods

All intensive care unit (ICU) admissions to whom MARS® therapy was prescribed from March 2005 to August 2021 were consecutively and prospectively included. The main endpoint was the incidence of adverse events related to MARS® therapy. Secondary endpoints were the biological and clinical effects of MARS® therapy.

Results

We reported 180 admissions treated with MARS® therapy. Among the 180 admissions, 56 (31.1%) were for acute-on-chronic liver failure, 32 (17.8%) for acute liver failure, 28 (15.5%) for post-surgery liver failure, 52 (28.9%) for pruritus and 12 (6.7%) for drug intoxication. At least one adverse event occurred in 95 (52.8%) admissions. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent adverse event which was recorded in 55 admissions (30.6%). Overall, platelets count was 131 (± 95) × 10⁹/L before and 106 (± 72) × 10⁹/L after MARS® therapy (p < .001). After MARS® therapy, total bilirubin was significantly decreased in all groups (p < 0.05). Hepatic encephalopathy significantly improved in both the acute-on-chronic and in the acute liver failure group (p = 0.01). In the pruritus group, pruritus intensity score was significantly decreased after MARS® therapy (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In this large cohort of patients treated with MARS® therapy we report frequent adverse events. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent adverse event. In all applications significant clinical and biological improvements were shown with MARS® therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04165-z.

Response Guided Slow Infusion of Albumin, Vasoconstrictors and Furosemide Improves Ascites Mobilization and Survival in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Background and Aims

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) with increasing organ failure is associated with poor outcomes. Severely deranged systemic hemodynamics and decreased effective arterial blood volume contribute to tissue damage and organ failure. Response-guided therapy with albumin, vasoconstrictors, and furosemide may help overcome effective hypovolemia, improve diuresis and impact survival.

Methods

In the observation cohort, 230 patients with ACLF (CANONIC criteria) with ascites (≥Grade II) and ACLF ≥Grade I were enrolled. A total of 136 patients (GROUP I) received response-guided (urine sodium >80mmol/day) slow albumin-furosemide infusion ± terlipressin (SAFI ± T), while 94 patients (GROUP II) received standard medical therapy. Twenty-eight-day survival, ascites mobilization (nil or grade 1), and adverse events were noted. In another mechanistic cohort (n = 40), laboratory evidences for improvement in various pathophysiological alterations; gut permeability, endotoxemia, cytokine storm, neutrophil dysfunction, and hemodynamic alterations following SAFI ± T/Noradrenaline (NAdr) were evaluated.

Results

Age, gender, CLIF-C-ACLF, SOFA and MELD scores, ACLF grades and urine sodium were not different between the two groups in the observation cohort. Ascites was mobilized in 102/136 in GROUP I (SAFI ± T) and 23/94 in GROUP II (p < 0.05). Twenty-eight-day survival was significantly higher in GROUP I = 103/136 (75.7%) vs GROUP II = 50/94 (53.2%), (P = <0.001). All those who were unable to reach urine sodium >80 mmol/day died. Four patients in GROUP I developed scrotal gangrene. In the mechanistic cohort, 72% of patients survived with significant improvement in gut permeability, endotoxemia, serum cytokines, neutrophil dysfunction, and hemodynamic alterations.

Conclusion

Ascitic fluid mobilization by response-guided SAFI ± T/NAdr therapy improves survival by improving splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics, decreasing gut congestion, gut permeability, and endotoxemia, improving neutrophil functions, and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines in circulation.

Extracorporeal Liver Support: A Bridge to Somewhere

Content available: Audio Recording.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography-Based Hepatic Perfusion for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Acute Liver Failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare but dramatic clinical syndrome characterized by massive hepatic necrosis leading to multiorgan failure. It is difficult to predict the outcomes in patients with ALF using existing prognostic models. We aimed to analyze hepatic perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound in patients with ALF and investigate its utility as a prognostic biomarker.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this prospective observational study, 208 patients with acute liver injury/ALF were enrolled from 2015 to 2019. We evaluated 50 consecutive patients with ALF with Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound performed on admission. The cases were divided into the following two groups: survivors (recovered without surgical intervention) and nonsurvivors (died of ALF or underwent liver transplantation). The time to peak and peak intensity of hepatic artery, portal vein, hepatic vein, and liver parenchyma were calculated using the time-intensity curve analysis. The hepatic artery (HA) resistive index was calculated using the fast Fourier transform analysis of Doppler ultrasound. The time interval (TI) between the time to peak of HA and liver parenchyma (LP) was significantly shorter in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors (P < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating curve values for TI (HA, LP), Japanese scoring system, HE prediction model, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and King's College Hospital criteria for the prediction of poor prognosis were 0.953, 0.914, 0.861, 0.816, and 0.731, respectively. The most appropriate cutoff value of TI (HA, LP) was 6.897 seconds; the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 94.4%, 90.6%, 85.0%, and 96.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TI (HA, LP) accurately predicts the outcome in patients with ALF and may be useful in clinical decision making.

Acute Decompensation and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Liver cirrhosis is a major healthcare problem. Acute decompensation, and in particular its interplay with dysfunction of other organs, is responsible for the majority of deaths in patients with cirrhosis. Acute decompensation has different courses, from stable decompensated cirrhosis over unstable decompensated cirrhosis to pre-acute-on-chronic liver failure and finally acute-on-chronic liver failure, a syndrome with high short-term mortality. This review focuses on the recent developments in the field of acute decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Uncertainty in the impact of liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of artificial and bioartificial liver support systems in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is still controversial. We aimed to perform the first network meta-analysis comparing and ranking different liver support systems and standard medical therapy (SMT) in patients with ACLF.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020155850). A systematic search was conducted in five databases. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of artificial or bioartificial liver support systems on survival in patients with ACLF. Ranking was performed by calculating the surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve values. The RoB2 tool and a modified GRADE approach were used for the assessment of the risk of bias and quality of evidence (QE).

RESULTS

In the quantitative synthesis 16 trials were included, using MARS®, Prometheus®, ELAD®, plasma exchange (PE) and BioLogic-DT®. Overall (OS) and transplant-free (TFS) survival were assessed at 1 and 3 months. PE significantly improved 3-month OS compared to SMT (RR 0.74, CrI: 0.6-0.94) and ranked first on the cumulative ranking curves for both OS outcomes (SUCRA: 86% at 3 months; 77% at 1 month) and 3-month TFS (SUCRA: 87%) and second after ELAD for 1-month TFS (SUCRA: 76%). Other comparisons did not reach statistical significance. QE was moderate for PE concerning 1-month OS and both TFS outcomes. Other results were of very low certainty.

CONCLUSION

PE seems to be the best currently available liver support therapy in ACLF regarding 3-month OS. Based on the low QE, randomized trials are needed to confirm our findings for already existing options and to introduce new devices.

Similarities, Differences, and Potential Synergies in the Mechanism of Action of Albumin Dialysis Using the MARS Albumin Dialysis Device and the CytoSorb Hemoperfusion Device in the Treatment of Liver Failure

INTRODUCTION

Liver failure is characterized by compromised hepatic detoxification, protein synthesis, and metabolic derangements leading to an accumulation of a broad spectrum of water-soluble and lipophilic toxins as well as immune system mediators. Exploring complex detoxification mechanisms to therapeutically target those components, this article will focus on similarities, differences, and potential synergies in the mechanism of albumin dialysis and hemoperfusion.

METHODS

An in vitro two-compartment model for the comparison of liver support techniques was used to compare MARS albumin dialysis modified with novel charcoal adsorbents to CytoSorb hemoperfusion with added hemodialysis for effects on marker molecule removal.

RESULTS

MARS and CytoSorb performed similar in the removal of water-soluble toxins. Ammonia removal was increased using CytoSorb. CytoSorb lead to a statistically significant reduction of albumin-bound toxins, total bilirubin and subfractions. Bile acid removal was comparable. MARS demonstrated no removal of cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), whereas CytoSorb allowed for near complete removal. Notably, CytoSorb displayed 50% of lipophilic substance and cytokine removal during the first hour of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Compared to MARS, CytoSorb hemoperfusion leads to an initially fast removal of cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6, as well as reduction of albumin-bound toxins such as indirect bilirubin and bile acids in our model. The initial removal is also associated with removal of albumin.

MARS: Should I Use It?

Severe liver failure, including acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, is associated with high mortality, and many patients die despite aggressive medical therapy. While liver transplantation is a viable treatment option for liver failure patients, a large proportion of these patients die given the shortage in the liver donation and the severity of illness, leading to death while waiting for a liver transplant. Extracorporeal liver support devices, including molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), have been developed as bridge to transplantation (bridge for patients who are decompensating while waiting for liver transplantation) and bridge to recovery (for whom recovery is deemed reasonable). In addition to its uses in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure, the MARS system has also been applied in various clinical settings, such as drug overdosing and poisoning and intractable cholestatic pruritus refractory to pharmacological treatment. This review aims to discuss the controversies, potential benefits, practicalities, and disadvantages of using MARS in clinical practice.

Posthepatectomy liver failure

Liver surgery is one of the most complex surgical interventions with high risk and potential for complications. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication of liver surgery that occurs in about 10% of patients undergoing major liver surgery. It is the main source of morbidity and mortality. Appropriate surgical techniques and intensive care management are important in preventing PHLF. Early start of the liver support systems is very important for the PHLF patient to recover, survive, or be ready for a liver transplant. Nonbiological and biological liver support systems should be used in PHLF to prepare for treatment or organ transplantation. The definition of the state, underlying pathophysiology and treatment strategies will be reviewed here.

Outcome of patients treated with molecular adsorbent recirculating system albumin dialysis: A national multicenter study

Background and Aim

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is the most widely used device to treat liver failure. Nevertheless, data from widespread real‐life use are lacking.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study conducted in all French adult care centers that used MARS between 2004 and 2009. The primary objective was to evaluate patient survival according to the liver disease and listing status. Factors associated with mortality were the secondary objectives.

Results

A total of 383 patients underwent 393 MARS treatments. The main indications were acute liver failure (ALF, 32.6%), and severe cholestasis (total bilirubin >340 μmol/L) (37.2%), hepatic encephalopathy (23.7%), and/or acute kidney injury–hepatorenal syndrome (22.9%) most often among patients with chronic liver disease. At the time of treatment, 34.4% of the patients were listed. Overall, the hospital survival rate was 49% (95% CI: 44–54%) and ranged from 25% to 81% depending on the diagnosis of the liver disease. In listed patients versus those not listed, the 1‐year survival rate was markedly better in the setting of nonbiliary cirrhosis (59% vs 15%), early graft nonfunction (80% vs 0%), and late graft dysfunction (72% vs 0%) (all P < 0.001). Among nonbiliary cirrhotic patients, hospital mortality was associated with the severity of liver disease (HE and severe cholestasis) and not being listed for transplant. In ALF, paracetamol etiology and ≥3 MARS sessions were associated with better transplant‐free survival.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that MARS should be mainly used as a bridge to liver transplantation. Survival was correlated with being listed for most etiologies and with the intensity of treatment in ALF.

Extracorporeal liver support in patients with liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

PURPOSE

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) are associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Extracorporeal liver support (ECLS) devices have been used as a bridge to liver transplant; however, the efficacy and safety of ECLS are unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of ECLS in liver failure.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through March 13, 2019. RCTs comparing ECLS to usual care in ALF or ACLF were included. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

We identified 25 RCTs (1796 patients). ECLS use was associated with reduction in mortality (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74, 0.96, moderate certainty) and improvement in hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60, 0.84, low certainty) in patients with ALF or ACLF. The effect of ECLS on hypotension (RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.98, 2.2, low certainty), bleeding (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.88, 1.66, moderate certainty), thrombocytopenia (RR 1.62; 95% CI 1.0, 2.64, very low certainty) and line infection (RR 1.92; 95% CI 0.11, 33.44, low certainty) was uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

ECLS may reduce mortality and improve HE in patients with ALF and ACLF. The effect on other outcomes is uncertain. However, the evidence is limited by risk of bias and imprecision, and larger trials are needed to better determine the effect of ECLS on patient-important outcomes.

Predictive factors for 28-day mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients admitted to the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an entity comprising an acute deterioration of liver function in cirrhotic patients, associated with organ failure(s) and high short-term mortality. We aimed to identify predictive factors for short-term mortality in patients admitted with ACLF that may benefit most from liver transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients admitted in ACLF to a tertiary intensive care unit between 2013 and 2017 was performed. The EASL-CLIF acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis (CANONIC) criteria were used to define ACLF grade. Multivariable analysis using 28-day mortality as an end-point was performed, including severity-of-disease scores and clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were admitted in ACLF over the study period. The commonest aetiology of liver disease was alcohol related 52/77(68%) and the commonest precipitant of ACLF was variceal haemorrhage 38/77(49%). Overall 28-day mortality was 42/77(55%) [ACLF-(grade)1:3/42(7%); ACLF-2:10/42(24%); and, ACLF-3:29/42(69%);p = 0.002]. On multivariable analysis MELD ≥ 26 [odds ratio(OR) = 11.559; 95% confidence interval(CI):2.820-47.382;p = 0.001], ACLF-3 (OR = 3.287; 95%CI:1.047-10.325;p = 0.042) at admission and requirement for renal replacement therapy (OR = 5.348; 95%CI:1.385-20.645;p = 0.015) were independently associated with 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients admitted with ACLF to intensive care have a high mortality rate. Defined early thresholds at admission can identify patients at the highest risk that may benefit most from liver transplantation.

The immunological roles in acute-on-chronic liver failure: An update

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) refers to the acute deterioration of liver function that occurs in patients with chronic liver disease. ACLF is characterized by acute decompensation, organ failure and high short-term mortality. Numerous studies have been conducted and remarkable progress has been made regarding the pathophysiology and pathogenesis of this disease in the last decade. The present review was to summarize the advances in this field.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted using the medical subject words "acute-on-chronic liver failure", "ACLF", "pathogenesis", "predictors", and "immunotherapy" combined with free text terms such as "systemic inflammation" and "immune paralysis". Relevant papers published before October 31, 2018, were included.

RESULTS

ACLF has two marked pathophysiological features, namely, excessive systemic inflammation and susceptibility to infection. The systemic inflammation is mainly manifested by a significant increase in the levels of plasma pro-inflammatory factors, leukocyte count and C-reactive protein. The underlying mechanisms are unclear and may be associated with decreased immune inhibitory cells, abnormal expression of cell surface molecules and intracellular regulatory pathways in immune cells and increased damage-associated molecular patterns in circulation. However, the main cause of susceptibility to infection is immune paralysis. Immunological paralysis is characterized by an attenuated activity of immune cells. The mechanisms are related to elevations of immune inhibitory cells and the concentration of plasma anti-inflammatory molecules. Some immune biological indicators, such as soluble CD163, are used to explore the pathogenesis and prognosis of the disease, and some immunotherapies, such as glucocorticoids and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, are effective on ACLF.

CONCLUSIONS

Overwhelming systemic inflammation and susceptibility to infection are two key features of ACLF. A better understanding of the state of a patient's immune system will help to guide immunotherapy for ACLF.

Extracorporeal Mass Exchange Technology Platform for Temporary Liver Support: A Clinical Feasibility Study on a Device and the Cell Source Primary Human Liver Cells

Clinical feasibility phase-I study data are discussed on the use and the safety of a modular mass exchanger for temporary extracorporeal treatment of liver failure; and the use of the cell source primary human liver cells isolated from discarded transplant organs as a metabolic module in this mass exchanger. This technology platform can be compared with the mass exchange functions of a human placenta before giving birth. The "maternal blood side" can be used with various sources/modules of metabolic support including artificial (e.g. absorber) or biological elements (e.g. cells), separated by membrane compartments. These keep the source of metabolic support from contact with the patient, including the immune cells, while allowing exchange of soluble or protein-bound plasma components for therapy. Each of the multiple independent membrane compartments are bundled towards the in/outlets but interwoven to form a decentralized multi-compartment mass exchanger within an effector module compartment. The use of liver cells as a metabolic module in this compartment results in its function as a bioreactor. A combination with further modules outside of the mass exchanger was demonstrated through a continuous SPAD for detoxification. Nine patients (5 m, 4 f) with a median age of 43 years (range 11-55 years) were treated with a total of 11 metabolic modules in 12 sessions, with overall treatment times ranging from 11 to 216 hours. Patients suffered from acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF, n=3), acute liver failure (ALF, n=3) and primary non-function graft after liver transplantation (PNF, n=3). Treatment resulted in a one-year survival of 78%. The results showed a significant decrease in thrombocytes and fibrinogen. No severe adverse effects were found. One patient (AoCLF) recovered without transplantation and remained alive for the one-year follow-up. Six patients (3 ALF, 2 PNF, and 1 AoCLF) were successfully bridged to transplantation, and two (1 AoCLF, 1 PNF) died within ten days after termination of therapy. Total and conjugated bilirubin, ammonia, urea and creatinine were significantly reduced by the end of therapy, compared to baseline. The MELD score decreased significantly, whereas no significant improvements were observed in APACHE-II, APACHE-III, SOFA and Child-Pugh scores. Conclusion: The mass exchanger technology platform, the Core Module used with primary human liver cells as Metabolic Module, proved to be clinically feasible and safe. Further clinical studies are required to prove the efficacy of such therapies. However, the clinical impact of using human liver cells as a Metabolic Module is limited and a reliable, biocompatible and effective metabolic source is in need.

Clinical Pearls in Medical Toxicology: Updates Ranging From Decontamination to Elimination

Such as any field of medicine, it is imperative to stay current with the latest advances and treatment modalities in toxicology. With the absence of rigorous randomized controlled trials, many updated guidelines are created by expert consensus and/or case reports and clinical experience. Over the past 10 years, there have been several changes in the management of drug overdoses in light of new data available. Although this is not a comprehensive review of all available antidotes, this article will focus on several important interventions including the use of gastrointestinal decontamination, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic therapy, methylene blue, intravenous lipid emulsion, hemodialysis, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal Devices

Extracorporeal liver support (ECLS) emerged from the need stabilize high-acuity liver failure patients with the highest risk of death. The goal is to optimize the hemodynamic, neurologic, and biochemical parameters in preparation for transplantation or to facilitate spontaneous recovery. Patients with acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure stand to benefit from these devices, especially because they have lost many of the primary functions of the liver, including detoxifying the blood of various endogenous and exogenous substances, manufacturing circulating proteins, secreting bile, and storing energy. Existing ECLS devices are designed to mimic some of these functions.

An evaluation of the usefulness of extracorporeal liver support techniques in patients with severe liver dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

The mortality rate in patients with severe liver dysfunction with no option of transplantation is unacceptably high. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of applying extracorporeal liver support (ECLS) techniques in this group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from hospital admissions of 101 patients with severe liver dysfunction who were admitted to the department of Anaesthesiology and intensive therapy between 2006 and 2015 were retrospectively analysed. The study group was divided into two subgroups. Standard Medical therapy (SMT) was a subgroup of patients receiving standard Medical therapy, and SMT + ECLS was a subgroup containing patients receiving standard medical therapy complemented by at least one extracorporeal liver support procedure.

RESULTS

Significantly lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and 30-day mortality rates were found in the SMT + ECLS subgroup (p = 0.0138 and p = 0.0238 respectively). No difference in 3-month mortality was identified between the two groups. In a multivariate model, independent risk factors for ICU mortality proved to be the SOFA score and prothrombin time. The highest discriminatory power for ICU mortality was demonstrated for the SOFA score, followed by APACHE II, SAPS II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores. For 30-day mortality, however, the best discriminatory power was shown for the SAPS II score, followed by SOFA, APACHE II, MELD UNOS and GCS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to assess the contribution of non-biological extracorporeal liver support procedures to a decrease in mortality rates in the population of patients with severe liver dysfunction.

Artificial liver support systems: what is new over the last decade?

The liver is a complex organ that performs vital functions of synthesis, heat production, detoxification and regulation; its failure carries a highly critical risk. At the end of the last century, some artificial liver devices began to develop with the aim of being used as supportive therapy until liver transplantation (bridge-to-transplant) or liver regeneration (bridge-to-recovery). The well-recognized devices are the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System™ (MARS™), the Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis system and the Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption system (Prometheus™). In the following years, experimental works and early clinical applications were reported, and to date, many thousands of patients have already been treated with these devices. The ability of artificial liver support systems to replace the liver detoxification function, at least partially, has been proven, and the correction of various biochemical parameters has been demonstrated. However, the complex tasks of regulation and synthesis must be addressed through the use of bioartificial systems, which still face several developmental problems and very high production costs. Moreover, clinical data on improved survival are conflicting. This paper reviews the progress achieved and new data published on artificial liver support systems over the past decade and the prospects for these devices.

Identification of key candidate genes and pathways in hepatitis B virus-associated acute liver failure by bioinformatical analysis

Hepatitis B virus-associated acute liver failure (HBV-ALF) is a rare but life-threatening syndrome that carried a high morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to explore the possible molecular mechanisms of HBV-ALF by means of bioinformatics analysis. In this study, genes expression microarray datasets of HBV-ALF from Gene Expression Omnibus were collected, and then we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by the limma package in R. After functional enrichment analysis, we constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network by the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes online database and weighted genes coexpression network by the WGCNA package in R. Subsequently, we picked out the hub genes among the DEGs. A total of 423 DEGs with 198 upregulated genes and 225 downregulated genes were identified between HBV-ALF and normal samples. The upregulated genes were mainly enriched in immune response, and the downregulated genes were mainly enriched in complement and coagulation cascades. Orosomucoid 1 (ORM1), orosomucoid 2 (ORM2), plasminogen (PLG), and aldehyde oxidase 1 (AOX1) were picked out as the hub genes that with a high degree in both PPI network and weighted genes coexpression network. The weighted genes coexpression network analysis found out 3 of the 5 modules that upregulated genes enriched in were closely related to immune system. The downregulated genes enriched in only one module, and the genes in this module majorly enriched in the complement and coagulation cascades pathway. In conclusion, 4 genes (ORM1, ORM2, PLG, and AOX1) with immune response and the complement and coagulation cascades pathway may take part in the pathogenesis of HBV-ALF, and these candidate genes and pathways could be therapeutic targets for HBV-ALF.

Critical care management of the patient with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant in the intensive care unit

Patients with cirrhosis who are awaiting liver transplantation (LT) are at high risk for developing critical illnesses. Current liver allocation policies that dictate a "sickest first" approach coupled with a mismatch between need and availability of organs result in longer wait times, and thus, patients are becoming increasingly ill while awaiting organ transplantation. Even patients with well-compensated cirrhosis may suffer acute deterioration; the syndrome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) results in multisystem organ dysfunction and a marked increase in associated short-term morbidity and mortality. For patients on transplant waiting lists, the development of multisystem organ failure may eliminate candidacy for transplant by virtue of being "too sick" to safely undergo transplantation surgery. The goals of intensive care management of patients suffering ACLF are to rapidly recognize and treat inciting events (eg, infection and bleeding) and to aggressively support failing organ systems to ensure that patients may successfully undergo LT. Management of the critically ill ACLF patient awaiting transplantation is best accomplished by multidisciplinary teams with expertise in critical care and transplant medicine. Such teams are well suited to address the needs of this unique patient population and to identify patients who may be too ill to proceed to transplantation surgery. The focus of this review is to identify the common complications of ACLF and to describe our approach management in critically ill patients awaiting LT in our centers. Liver Transplantation 23 1465-1476 2017 AASLD.

Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System Can Reduce Short-Term Mortality Among Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure-A Retrospective Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives:

Acute-on-chronic liver failure is associated with numerous consecutive organ failures and a high short-term mortality rate. Molecular adsorbent recirculating system therapy has demonstrated beneficial effects on the distinct symptoms, but the associated mortality data remain controversial.

Design:

Retrospective analysis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients receiving either standard medical treatment or standard medical treatment and molecular adsorbent recirculating system. Secondary analysis of data from the prospective randomized Recompensation of Exacerbated Liver Insufficiency with Hyperbilirubinemia and/or Encephalopathy and/or Renal Failure trial by applying the recently introduced Chronic Liver Failure-criteria.

Setting:

Medical Departments of University Hospital Muenster (Germany).

Patients:

This analysis was conducted in two parts. First, 101 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grades 1–3 and Chronic Liver Failure-C-Organ Failure liver subscore equals to 3 but stable pulmonary function were identified and received either standard medical treatment (standard medical treatment, n = 54) or standard medical treatment and molecular adsorbent recirculating system (n = 47) at the University Hospital Muenster. Second, the results of this retrospective analysis were tested against the Recompensation of Exacerbated Liver Insufficiency with Hyperbilirubinemia and/or Encephalopathy and/or Renal Failure trial.

Interventions:

Standard medical treatment and molecular adsorbent recirculating system.

Measurements and Main Results:

Additionally to improved laboratory variables (bilirubin and creatinine), the short-term mortality (up to day 14) of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system group was significantly reduced compared with standard medical treatment. A reduced 14-day mortality rate was observed in the molecular adsorbent recirculating system group (9.5% vs 50.0% with standard medical treatment; p = 0.004), especially in patients with multiple organ failure (acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 2–3). Concerning the affected organ system, this effect of molecular adsorbent recirculating system on mortality was particularly evident among patients with increased kidney, brain, or coagulation Chronic Liver Failure-C-Organ Failure subscores. Subsequent reanalysis of the Recompensation of Exacerbated Liver Insufficiency with Hyperbilirubinemia and/or Encephalopathy and/or Renal Failure dataset with adoption of the Chronic Liver Failure-classification resulted in similar findings.

Conclusions:

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment was associated with an improved short-term survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and multiple organ failure. Among these high-risk patients, molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment might bridge to liver recovery or liver transplantation.

Liver Transplantation for Acute on Chronic Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

Acute-on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined as acute insult on previous liver disease that causes sudden worsening of liver functions.

METHODS

ACLF is characterized by high incidence of organ failure and prognosis is remarkably worse than patients with cirrhosis. Incidence of organ failures is very high despite best medical care and timely liver transplant before development of multi organ failure is associated with good survival rates.

RESULTS

At present, there are no reliable score or ways to correctly identify patients who are going to recover from patients who will need transplantation. Organ failures are important part of prognosis and to define need or futility of early liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) published their recommendations regarding ACLF in 2014. Several important studies regarding course/nature of disease and transplantation for ACLF became available after 2014 APASL recommendations and still there are some unanswered areas. The current review discusses various issues regarding liver transplantation in patients with ACLF.

Current Evidence for Extracorporeal Liver Support Systems in Acute Liver Failure and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Artificial (nonbiological) extracorporeal liver support devices aim to remove albumin-bound and water-soluble toxins to restore and preserve hepatic function and mitigate or limit the progression of multiorgan failure while hepatic recovery or liver transplant occurs. The following beneficial effects have been documented: improvement of jaundice, amelioration of hemodynamic instability, reduction of portal hypertension, and improvement of hepatic encephalopathy. The only randomized prospective multicenter controlled trial to show an improvement in transplant-free survival was for high-volume plasmapheresis. Biological (cell-based) extracorporeal liver support systems aim to support the failing liver through detoxification and synthetic function and warrant further study for safety and benefit.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) in acute liver injury and graft dysfunction: Results from a case-control study

Background

The primary therapeutic goals in the treatment of liver injury are to support liver regeneration or bridge the gap to liver transplantation (LT). Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) therapy has shown beneficial effects for specific symptoms of liver failure; however, general survival advantages have not yet been demonstrated.

Aim

We studied the effects of MARS therapy compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) in two patient cohorts: in patients with an acute liver injury and in those with graft dysfunction (GD).

Methods

We report on our experience over a 6.5-year period with 73 patients treated with SMT or with SMT and MARS (MARS group). In total, 53 patients suffered from acute liver injury in their native liver without a preexisting liver disease (SMT: n = 31, MARS: n = 22), and 20 patients showed a severe GD after LT (SMT: n = 10, MARS: n = 10).

Results

The entire cohort was predominantly characterized by hemodynamically and respiratorily stable patients with a low hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grade and a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 20.57 (MARS) or 22.51 (SMT, p = 0.555). Within the MARS group, the median number of extracorporeal therapy sessions was four (range = 3–5 sessions). Independent of the underlying etiology, MARS improved the patients’ bilirubin values in the short term compared to SMT alone. In patients with acute liver injury, this response was sustained even after the end of MARS therapy. By contrast, the majority of patients with GD and an initial response to MARS therapy experienced worsened hyperbilirubinemia. No differences in 28-day mortality were observed with respect to acute liver injury (MARS 5.3% (95% CI: 0–15.3); SMT 3.3% (95% CI: 0–9.8), p = 0.754) or GD (MARS 20.0% (95% CI: 0–44.7), SMT 11.1% (95% CI: 0–31.7), p = 0.478).

Conclusions

Although it did not improve 28-day mortality, MARS therapy improved the short-term response in patients with acute liver injury as well as in those with GD. In cases of acute hepatic injury, the use of MARS therapy resulted in the sustained stabilization of liver function and improved liver regeneration. A short-term response to MARS may predict the future course of the disease.

First clinical experience in 14 patients treated with ADVOS: a study on feasibility, safety and efficacy of a new type of albumin dialysis

BACKGROUND

Liver failure (LF) is associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased cost and substantial mortality. Due to the limited number of donor organs, extracorporeal liver support is suggested as an appealing concept to "bridge to transplant" or to avoid transplant in case of recovery. ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a new type of albumin dialysis, that provides rapid regeneration of toxin-binding albumin by two purification circuits altering the binding capacities of albumin by biochemical (changing of pH) and physical (changing of temperature) modulation of the dialysate. It was the aim of this study to evaluate feasibility, efficacy and safety of ADVOS in the first 14 patients ever treated with this procedure.

METHODS

Patients included suffered from acute on chronic LF (n = 9) or "secondary" LF (n = 5) which resulted from non-hepatic diseases such as sepsis. The primary endpoint was the change of serum bilirubin, creatinine and serum BUN levels before and after the first treatment with ADVOS. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for paired samples was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 239 treatments (1 up to 101 per patient) were performed in 14 patients (6 female, 8 male). Mean age 54 ± 13; MELD-score 34 ± 7; CLIF-SOFA 15 ± 3. Serum bilirubin levels were significantly decreased by 32% during the first session (26.0 ± 15.4 vs. 17.7 ± 10.5 mg/dl; p = 0.001). Similarly, serum creatinine (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dl; p = 0.005) and serum BUN (49.4 ± 23.3 vs. 31.1 ± 19.7 mg/dl; p = 0.003), were significantly lowered by 27% and 37%, respectively. None of the treatment sessions had to be interrupted due to side effects related to the procedure.

CONCLUSION

ADVOS efficiently eliminates water- and protein-bound toxins in humans with LF. ADVOS is feasible in patients with advanced LF which is emphasized by a total number of more than 100 treatment sessions in one single patient.

[Acute-on-chronic liver failure: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for intensive care]

Das akut-auf-chronische Leberversagen („acute-on-chronic liver failure“, ACLF) ist ein emergentes Krankheitssyndrom, das durch einen oder mehrere akute Trigger bei vorgeschädigter Leber ausgelöst wird und vom progressiven hepatalen und nichthepatalen Organversagen, einem gravierenden Risiko infektiöser Komplikationen sowie hoher kurzfristiger Letalität gekennzeichnet ist. Wenngleich pathophysiologisch noch weitgehend unverstanden erfordert das ACLF frühzeitige diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen, die sich auf zugrunde liegende Ursachen sowie das Verhindern von Komplikationen richten, um die Prognose betroffener Patienten zu verbessern.

Acute-on-chronic hepatitis. A case report of autoimmune hepatitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis overlap syndrome in a 15-year-old patient

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a disease in which a rapid deterioration of liver function occurs in patients with chronic liver disease, and is usually associated with a precipitating event. We present the case of a boy with autoimmune hepatitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis (AIH/PSC/UC) overlap syndrome, in whom liver function was stable for 4.5 years of treatment. At 15 years of age the patient was hospitalized due to a deterioration of his general condition, severe abdominal pain, diarrhoea, vomiting and weight loss. There was also a rapid deterioration of liver function and a deterioration of renal function. Despite a wide spectrum of diagnostic examinations, no precipitating agent was found. After two episodes of massive bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. The patient underwent a successful liver transplantation. ACLF can cause irreversible liver failure with a high mortality rate, which calls for liver transplantation.

Prevalence and risk factors of acute-on-chronic liver failure in a single center from Argentina

AIM

To study the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors and mortality at 28 d of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

A total of 100 cirrhotic patients admitted to our hospital for more than one day were included during the period between June 2013 and December 2015. We used the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure-Consortium diagnostic criteria for ACLF, considering it as the acute decompensation of cirrhosis associated with the presence of one or more organ failure. For the diagnosis of organic failure the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was used. Our population was divided into patients with and without ACLF. Clinical characteristics, presence of precipitating events, potential risk factors for developing ACLF and causes of mortality were analyzed. Mortality at 28 d was evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (29%) developed ACLF criteria. Alcoholism, detected in 58 patients (58%), was the major etiological agent of cirrhosis. Bacterial infections were recognized as a precipitating event in 41.3% of cases and gastrointestinal bleeding in 27.5%. No precipitating event was identifiable in 27.5% of patients with ACLF. Comparing patients with and without ACLF, statistically significant risk factors were: Child Pugh score 10.2 ± 2.1 vs 8.4 ± 1.6 (P ˂ 0.0001), MELD score 20.7 ± 8.5 vs 12.3 ± 4 (P ˂ 0.0001), presence of ascites 27 (93%) vs 43 (60.5%) (P = 0.001), leukocytosis 15300 ± 8033 per cubic millimeter vs 10770 ± 5601 per cubic millimeter (P ˂ 0.0001), and high plasma levels of C reactive protein values 50.9 ± ​​46.4 mg/L vs 28.6 ± 23.4 mg/L (P ˂ 0.0019). Mortality rate was 62% (18 patients) vs 5.6% (4 patients), respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We observed that the ACLF is a frequent entity in this group of patients and has a significantly higher mortality rate.

Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a distinct entity that differs from acute liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis in timing, presence of treatable acute precipitant, and course of disease, with a potential for self-recovery. The core concept is acute deterioration of existing liver function in a patient of chronic liver disease with or without cirrhosis in response to an acute insult. The insult should be a hepatic one and presentation in the form of liver failure (jaundice, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, ascites) with or without extrahepatic organ failure in a defined time frame. ACLF is characterized by a state of deregulated inflammation. Initial cytokine burst presenting as SIRS, progression to CARS and associated immunoparalysis leads to sepsis and multi-organ failure. Early identification of the acute insult and mitigation of the same, use of nucleoside analogue in HBV-ACLF, steroid in severe alcoholic hepatitis, steroid in severe autoimmune hepatitis and/or bridging therapy lead to recovery, with a 90-day transplant-free survival rate of up to 50 %. First-week presentation is crucial concerning SIRS/sepsis, development, multiorgan failure and consideration of transplant. A protocol-based multi-disciplinary approach including critical care hepatology, early liver transplant before multi-organ involvement, or priority for organ allocation may improve the outcome. Presentation with extrahepatic organ involvement or inclusion of sepsis as an acute insult in definition restricts the therapy, i.e., liver transplant or bridging therapy, and needs serious consideration. Augmentation of regeneration, cell-based therapy, immunotherapy, and gut microbiota modulation are the emerging areas and need further research.

[Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension]

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common manifestations encountered in clinical practice. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic pre- and post-transplantation patients. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a special form of AKI in cirrhotic patients, was recognized as a consequence of renal vasoconstriction from systemic/renal hemodynamic alterations developed in advanced cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Recently, multiple factors-such as infection/inflammation, underlying glomerulonephritis, bile cast, or increased abdominal pressure-have been considered to contribute to renal dysfunction in cirrhotic patients, which were presumed to induce HRS. Moreover, in addition to changing the definition of AKI in the nephrologic guidelines, the new AKI definition for early diagnosis and intervention based on characteristics of liver cirrhosis has been proposed in an international meeting. This article provides a comprehensive and recent review of AKI definition, laying out the topics in accordance with the pathophysiologic mechanisms and therapeutic interventions of AKI in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure-What is in a 'Definition'?

Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a recently recognized syndrome and its definition has been evolving over last two decades. Currently, there is no universal consensus about the definition as kind of cases being seen in the Western world appear to be somewhat different from those that are seen in Asia Pacific region. But every one agrees that definition of ACLF should include following components. (a) The status of pre-existing liver disease, (b) defining the acute insult that leads to rapid deterioration of liver status, (c) time frame during which the acute insult can lead to rapid deterioration, (d) the quantification and definition of liver failure status after deterioration, which will determine the severity of ACLF, and (e) prediction of prognosis after analyzing first four components in the short and long terms. There is some consensus that number of organ failures may be the main determinant of prognosis. Whatever the definition is being used, the central role that superadded infections play in ACLF cannot be denied and need to be tackled aggressively. Apart from that, recovery may be possible if the acute insult or the baseline disease is curable, i.e. with the use of nucleoside analogs for hepatitis B, and corticosteroids for severe autoimmune hepatitis. Development of dynamic criteria with observations in Hospital may improve our understanding of prognosis as well as our approach to the management of ACLF.

Extracorporeal liver support devices for listed patients

An alternative to liver transplantation for patients with liver failure remains an unmet need. In acute liver failure, the ideal extracorporeal liver support device (ELSD) would replace the functions of the failing liver in order to permit spontaneous recovery, given the incredible regenerative potential of the liver, negating the need for transplantation. In acute-on-chronic liver failure, an ELSD would ideally support hepatic function until a recovery to liver function before acute decompensation or until liver transplantation. In decompensated cirrhosis, an ELSD could again be used to support hepatic function until transplant. In addition, ELSDs may have the potential to treat the multiorgan failure that accompanies liver failure including hepatic encephalopathy, renal failure, and immune dysfunction or indeed potential to promote liver regeneration. Creation of an extracorporeal bioartificial liver able to completely replace liver function remains an unmet need. This review will describe a number of technologies suitable for clinical trials in humans, which have resulted from decades of engineering and biological research to develop a bioreactor able to adequately sustain functional hepatocytes. In addition, this review will describe artificial liver support devices that are primarily designed to replace the detoxifying functions of the liver and will consider the current data available or studies required to support their use in liver failure patients on the transplant waiting list. Liver Transplantation 22 839-848 2016 AASLD.

Peritoneal Albumin Dialysis as a Novel Approach for Liver Support: Study in a Porcine Model of Acute Hepatic Failure

Artificial liver support gained considerable interest in recent years due to the development of various albumin dialysis systems, which prolong survival of some patients with acute liver failure (ALF). Τhis study aims to examine the role of peritoneal albumin dialysis in a postoperative ALF model. ALF was induced in 14 female Landrace pigs by a combination of major liver resection (70-75% of total parenchyma) and ischemic-reperfusion injury on the liver remnant. Animals were randomly divided in two groups (n = 7 each). Both were monitored for 12 h of reperfusion and received peritoneal dialysis for 6 h, beginning 6 h after reperfusion. The albumin group received an albumin-rich solution and the control group received albumin-free solution. The control group gradually developed intracranial hypertension, whereas, in the albumin group, rise in the intracranial pressure was substantially attenuated (P < 0.01, t = 12 h). Albumin-treated animals had significantly lower levels of ammonia (P < 0.01), total bile acids (P < 0.01), free fatty acids (P < 0.05), lactate (P < 0.01), and total bilirubin (P < 0.05). Liver malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl were significantly reduced (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001 at t = 12 h) after albumin dialysis. Results suggest that this method may become a useful adjunct in the management of ALF, thus, justifying further study.

Overview on acute-on-chronic liver failure

Liver failure (LF) is defined as severe dysfunction in hepatic synthesis, detoxification, and metabolism induced by various etiologies. Clinical presentation of LF typically includes severe jaundice, coagulation disorder, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. LF can be classified into acute LF, acute-on-chronic LF (ACLF), and chronic LF. ACLF has been demonstrated as a distinct syndrome with unique clinical presentation and outcomes. The severity, curability, and reversibility of ACLF have attracted considerable attention. Remarkable developments in ACLF-related conception, diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, and therapy have been achieved. However, this disease, especially its diagnostic criteria, remains controversial. In this paper, we systemically reviewed the current understanding of ACLF from its definition, etiology, pathophysiology, pathology, and clinical presentation to management by thoroughly comparing important findings between east and west countries, as well as those from other regions. We also discussed the controversies, challenges, and needs for future studies to promote the standardization and optimization of the diagnosis and treatment for ACLF.

Extracorporeal support for patients with acute and acute on chronic liver failure

The number of patients developing liver failure; acute on chronic liver failure and acute liver failure continues to increase, along with the demand for donor livers for transplantation. As such there is a clinical need to develop effective extracorporeal devices to support patients with acute liver failure or acute-on-chronic liver failure to allow time for hepatocyte regeneration, and so avoiding the need for liver transplantation, or to bridge the patient to liver transplantation, and also potentially to provide symptomatic relief for patients with cirrhosis not suitable for transplantation. Currently devices can be divided into those designed to remove toxins, including plasma exchange, high permeability dialyzers and adsorption columns or membranes, coupled with replacement of plasma proteins; albumin dialysis systems; and bioartificial devices which may provide some of the biological functions of the liver. In the future we expect combinations of these devices in clinical practice, due to the developments in bioartificial scaffolds.

Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) in Coastal Eastern India: "A Single-Center Experience"

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute-On-Chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an emerging entity. The present study was undertaken to analyze the clinical profile and natural course of ACLF patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ACLF was defined as per Asia Pacific Association for the Study of Liver consensus criteria 2009. Patients fulfilling these criteria with some deviations were included and prospectively evaluated for clinical profile, etiologies of acute decompensation (AD) and underlying chronic liver disease, and short-term natural course [3 months].

RESULTS

Out of 123 patients with ACLF (mean age: 45.83 ± 12.05 years; male:female 109:14), 45.53% cases had prior history of AD, and 54.47% presented for the first time as ACLF. Etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol, cryptogenic, and chronic hepatitis B virus infection in 65.04%, 23.57%, and 11.38% cases, respectively. Recent history of alcohol intake (within 4 weeks) [42.27%] followed by bacterial infections [36.58%] were the common etiologic precipitants for AD. Only 87 (70.73%) out of 123 cases could be followed up for a duration of 3 months; 62 (71.26%) cases died by 3 months. Most deaths occurred in the alcoholics compared to nonalcoholics [(43/53) 81.13% vs. (19/34) 55.88%; P = 0.01]. No significant difference in mortality rate was observed between ACLF cases with history of prior AD compared to newly diagnosed ACLF cases [30/40 (75%) vs. 32/47 (68.09%); P = 0.477]. The prognostic markers [MELD, MELD-Na, CTP] were not significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSION

ACLF patients in our population had high short-term mortality rates with majority of deaths in alcoholics. Alcohol intake and bacterial infections were mainly responsible for AD in our study.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: terminology, mechanisms and management

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a distinct clinical entity and differs from acute liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis in timing, presence of acute precipitant, course of disease and potential for unaided recovery. The definition involves outlining the acute and chronic insults to include a homogenous patient group with liver failure and an expected outcome in a specific timeframe. The pathophysiology of ACLF relates to persistent inflammation, immune dysregulation with initial wide-spread immune activation, a state of systematic inflammatory response syndrome and subsequent sepsis due to immune paresis. The disease severity and outcome can be predicted by both hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure(s). Clinical recovery is expected with the use of nucleoside analogues for hepatitis B, and steroids for severe alcoholic hepatitis and, possibly, severe autoimmune hepatitis. Artificial liver support systems help remove toxins and metabolites and serve as a bridge therapy before liver transplantation. Hepatic regeneration during ongoing liver failure, although challenging, is possible through the use of growth factors. Liver transplantation remains the definitive treatment with a good outcome. Pre-emptive antiviral agents for hepatitis B before chemotherapy to prevent viral reactivation and caution in using potentially hepatotoxic drugs can prevent the development of ACLF.

Liver Support With Albumin Dialysis Reduces Hepatitis C Virus Viremia and Facilitates Antiviral Treatment of Severe Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Patients with severe hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) present an ominous prognosis, rarely achieving sustained virological response (SVR). Dialysis procedures may transiently decrease the HCV viral load, but the effect of albumin dialysis is currently unknown. Here, we evaluated the impact of albumin dialysis using the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) used as a co-adjuvant antiviral treatment for severe HCV recurrence after LT. Thirteen patients (11 males, median age 48 years) with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis or METAVIR fibrosis score ≥ F3 with severe portal hypertension underwent three consecutive MARS sessions. Antiviral therapy was initiated in 11 patients within 24 h after the MARS sessions. A contemporary cohort of seven patients who did not follow the MARS protocol is shown for comparison. MARS treatment resulted in consistent decreases of viral load from 7.59 log10 IU/mL [6.15-8.90] to 6.79 log10 IU/mL [5.18-7.84] (P = 0.003) as well as in decreases of serum bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (all P < 0.05). The overall rate of SVR was 0% in the Control group and 54.6% in patients initiating antiviral therapy within 24 h after MARS. Survival at 1 and 3 years was, respectively, 93% and 70% in patients undergoing MARS, compared with 29% and 14% in the Control group (P = 0.001). No major adverse events related to MARS treatment were observed. In conclusion, the use of MARS may facilitate the achievement of SVR and improve the prognosis of patients with severe HCV-recurrence after LT by reducing viral load and improving liver function prior to antiviral therapy.