Human herpesvirus 6 infection in adult living related liver transplant recipients

Post liver transplant recurrent and de novo viral infections

Survival following liver transplantation has changed dramatically owing to improvement in surgical techniques, peri-operative care and optimal immunosuppressive therapy. Post-Liver transplant (LT) de novo or recurrent viral infection continues to cause major allograft dysfunction, leading to poor graft and patient survival in untreated patients. Availability of highly effective antiviral drugs has significantly improved post-LT survival. Patients transplanted for chronic hepatitis B infection should receive life-long nucleos(t)ide analogues, with or without HBIg for effective viral control. Patients with chronic hepatitis C should be commenced on directly acting antiviral (DAA) drugs prior to transplantation. DAA therapy for post-LT recurrent hepatitis C infection is associated with close to 100% sustained virological response (SVR), irrespective of genotype. De novo chronic Hepatitis E infection is an increasingly recognised cause of allograft dysfunction in LT recipients. Untreated chronic HEV infection of the graft may lead to liver fibrosis and allograft failure. CMV and EBV can reactivate leading to systemic illness following liver transplantation. With COVID-19 pandemic, post-transplant patients are at risk of SARS-Co-V2 infection. Majority of the LT recipients require hospitalization, and the mortality in this population is around 20%. Early recognition of allograft dysfunction and identification of viral aetiology is essential in the management of post-LT de novo or recurrent infections. Optimising immunosuppression is an important step in reducing the severity of allograft damage in the treatment of post-transplant viral infections. Viral clearance or control can be achieved by early initiation of high potency antiviral therapy.

Comparative Analysis of Roseoloviruses in Humans, Pigs, Mice, and Other Species

Viruses of the genus Roseolovirus belong to the subfamily Betaherpesvirinae, family Herpesviridae. Roseoloviruses have been studied in humans, mice and pigs, but they are likely also present in other species. This is the first comparative analysis of roseoloviruses in humans and animals. The human roseoloviruses human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A), 6B (HHV-6B), and 7 (HHV-7) are relatively well characterized. In contrast, little is known about the murine roseolovirus (MRV), also known as murine thymic virus (MTV) or murine thymic lymphotrophic virus (MTLV), and the porcine roseolovirus (PRV), initially incorrectly named porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV). Human roseoloviruses have gained attention because they can cause severe diseases including encephalitis in immunocompromised transplant and AIDS patients and febrile seizures in infants. They have been linked to a number of neurological diseases in the immunocompetent including multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's. However, to prove the causality in the latter disease associations is challenging due to the high prevalence of these viruses in the human population. PCMV/PRV has attracted attention because it may be transmitted and pose a risk in xenotransplantation, e.g., the transplantation of pig organs into humans. Most importantly, all roseoloviruses are immunosuppressive, the humoral and cellular immune responses against these viruses are not well studied and vaccines as well as effective antivirals are not available.

Human herpesvirus 6, 7, and 8 in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of HHV-6A, HHV-6B, HHV-7, and HHV-8 in the pre- and post-transplant period. The majority of HHV-6 (A and B) and HHV-7 infections in transplant recipients are asymptomatic; symptomatic disease is reported infrequently across organs. Routine screening for HHV-6 and 7 DNAemia is not recommended in asymptomatic patients, nor is prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. Detection of viral nucleic acid by quantitative PCR in blood or CSF is the preferred method for diagnosis of HHV-6 and HHV-7 infection. The possibility of chromosomally integrated HHV-6 DNA should be considered in individuals with persistently high viral loads. Antiviral therapy should be initiated for HHV-6 encephalitis and should be considered for other manifestations of disease. HHV-8 causes Kaposi's sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman disease and is also associated with hemophagocytic syndrome and bone marrow failure. HHV-8 screening and monitoring may be indicated to prevent disease. Treatment of HHV-8 related disease centers on reduction of immunosuppression and conversion to sirolimus, while chemotherapy may be needed for unresponsive disease. The role of antiviral therapy for HHV-8 infection has not yet been defined.

Clinical course of human herpesvirus 6 infection in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Differentiation between active and latent viral infection is critical for analysis of HHV-6-associated disease. HHV-6 infection has been associated with several clinical manifestations; however, the precise role of HHV-6 in pediatric LDLT remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 33 pediatric patients who received LDLT. All of the recipients were monitored for HHV-6 infection using viral isolation and real-time PCR. HHV-6 infection was observed in 14 of 33 (42.4%) recipients, and HHV-6B infection occurred within 2 weeks after LDLT in 10 of 14 (71.4%) recipients. HHV-6 was isolated from 10 of 33 (30.3%) recipients. Multivariate analysis showed that independent predictors of HHV-6B infection were age (OR 0.975; 95% CI 0.943-0.999; P = .041), PELD (OR 1.091; P = .038), and biliary atresia (OR 16.48; P = .035). The occurrence of unexplained fever was significantly higher in recipients with HHV-6B infection (11/14) compared with uninfected recipients (6/19) (P = .013). Additionally, ALT levels at 8 and 9 weeks after transplantation were significantly higher in the recipients with HHV-6B infection. Younger age, high MELD/PELD score, and biliary atresia as an underlying disease were identified as risk factors for viral infection.

Fatal outcome after reactivation of inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6A (iciHHV-6A) transmitted through liver transplantation

HHV-6A and HHV-6B are found as inherited and chromosomally integrated forms (iciHHV-6A and -6B) into all germinal and somatic cells and vertically transmitted in a Mendelian manner in about 1% of the population. They were occasionally shown to be horizontally transmitted through hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Here, we present a clinical case of horizontal transmission of iciHHV-6A from donor to recipient through liver transplantation. Molecular analysis performed on three viral genes (7.2 kb) in the recipient and donor samples supports transmission of iciHHV-6A from the graft. Transmission was followed by reactivation, with high viral loads in several compartments. The infection was uncontrollable, leading to severe disease and death, despite antiviral treatments and the absence of resistance mutations. This case highlights the fact that physicians should be aware of the possible horizontal transmission of iciHHV-6 and its consequences in case of reactivation in immunocompromised patients.

HHV-6 in liver transplantation: A literature review

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6A and HHV-6B) can cause primary infection or reactivate from latency in liver transplant recipients, which can result in a variety of clinical syndromes, including fever, hepatitis, encephalitis and higher rates of graft dysfunction as well as indirect effects including increased risks of mortality, CMV disease, hepatitis C progression and greater fibrosis scores. Although HHV-6 infection is currently diagnosed by quantifying viral DNA in plasma or blood, biopsy to demonstrate histopathological effects of HHV-6 remains the gold standard for diagnosis of end-organ disease. HHV-6 reactivation may be restricted to the infected organ with no evidence of active infection in the blood. HHV-6 infections in liver transplant patients are mostly asymptomatic, but clinically significant tissue-invasive infections have been treated successfully with ganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir. Inherited chromosomally integrated HHV-6 (ciHHV-6), in either the recipient or the donor organ, may create confusion about systemic HHV-6 infection. Recipients with inherited ciHHV-6 may have an increased risk of opportunistic infection and graft rejection. This article reviews the current scientific data on the clinical effects, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of HHV-6 infections in liver transplant recipients.

Human herpes virus 6 infection in pediatric organ transplant patients

Transplant patients need lifelong immunosuppressive medication, but this reduces their defense mechanisms, making them prone to viral infections and reactivations. We aimed to clarify the prevalence and clinical manifestations of the human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) infection in children after pediatric solid organ transplants. Clinical findings and viral loads were compared between primary HHV-6 infections and reactivations. The study comprised 47 kidney, 25 liver, and 12 heart transplant patients who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2014. HHV-6 antibodies were analyzed before surgery, and HHV-6 DNAemia tests were regularly carried out after the transplant using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction method. We found the primary HHV-6 infection in 19 of 22 (86%) seronegative patients, and it was more common in patients under 3 years of age (79%) than over 3 (38%, P=.0002). Post-transplant HHV-6 DNAemia affected 48 of 84 (57%) patients and was significantly higher in primary infections than reactivations (P=.001), and 17 of 48 (35%) patients had symptoms when it was detected at a median of 2 weeks post-transplant. The HHV-6 infection was common after solid organ transplants, especially under 3 years of age, and it typically started 2 weeks after surgery. Testing for HHV-6 DNAemia is recommended shortly after transplantation, especially in patients with fever, diarrhea, rash, seizures, or abnormal liver enzyme tests.

Infections due to human herpesvirus 6 in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the current state of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection after solid organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

HHV-6 reactivates commonly during the early weeks after solid organ transplantation. However, disease due to HHV-6 is uncommon and is manifested as a febrile illness associated with rash and tissue-invasive manifestations such as encephalitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and gastrointestinal disease. HHV-6 has also been indirectly associated with other opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus and fungal infections. Molecular tests such as PCR assays are preferred methods for the diagnosis of HHV-6 infection. Recent guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Disease Community of Practice does not recommend specific antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for HHV-6 infection. For established disease, intravenous ganciclovir and foscarnet are considered first-line agents.

SUMMARY

Infection due to HHV-6 is a common after transplantation, but clinical disease is rare. Nonetheless, this infection has been indirectly associated with poor allograft and patient survival after transplantation. No specific prevention strategy is recommended, but treatment of established HHV-6 disease consists of antiviral therapy with intravenous ganciclovir and/or foscarnet, and reduction in immunosuppression.

Virus specific cell-mediated immunity may play a role in controlling reactivated human herpesvirus 6B in patients under measles induced immunosuppression

For a better understanding of the cellular immune responses to reactivated HHV 6B the lymphoproliferative response to human herpesvirus 6B (HHV 6B) antigen was measured in three consecutive specimens obtained biweekly from 22 young children and infants suffering from acute measles, and in 19 influenza patients and nine healthy control subjects. HHV 6B DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was detected in 18 of 22 subjects with measles, but not in the influenza patients or the healthy population. A novel reactivation profile of HHV 6B was found in patients with measles in the milder form of immunosuppression than in patients with organ transplantation. HHV 6B specific lymphoproliferation activities increased correspondingly with reactivation of HHV 6B assessed by detecting HHV 6B DNA in PBMCs in patients with measles, but no significant change in either the antibody response to HHV 6B or DNAemia occurred in serial specimens obtained either from patients with influenza or healthy subjects. This novel form of HHV 6B reactivation without antibody response was observed in patients with measles. The dynamic fluctuations in lymphoproliferative responses in measles may represent the balance between HHV 6B reactivation and its suppression by the host immune system.

Drug-induced severe adverse reaction enhanced by human herpes virus-6 reactivation

Reactivation of certain latent viruses has been linked with a more severe course of drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). For example, reactivation of human herpes virus (HHV)-6 is associated with severe organ involvement and a prolonged course of disease. The present study discusses an HSR developed in a previously healthy male exposed to ceftriaxone, doxycycline, vancomycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole; TMP/SMX). Initially, the patient presented clinical manifestations of HSR, as well as clinical and laboratory measurements compatible with liver and renal failure. Moreover, the patient presented skin desquamation compatible with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis. During the reaction, it was observed HHV-6 reactivation. The severity of clinical symptoms is correlated with HHV-6 titer, as well as with results of the in vitro lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA). Serum levels of a large panel of cytokines are compared between the patient, a large population of SJS patients, and a cohort of healthy controls, using data collected by our laboratory over the years. HHV-6 was measured in the cell culture media from lymphocytes incubated with each of the 4 drugs. Moreover, we describe a new assay using cytokines released by patient lymphocytes following in vitro exposure to the incriminated drugs as biomarkers of HSR. Based on LTA results, HHV-6 reactivation and cytokine measurements, we establish that only doxycycline and TMP/SMX were involved in the HSR. As result of this analysis, the patient could continue to use the other 2 antibiotics safely.

Rhabdomyolysis in an infant with primary human herpesvirus 6 infection

We report here the first case of rhabdomyolysis at the time of primary human herpesvirus 6 infection. The patient was a previously healthy 1-year-old girl who developed rhabdomyolysis 4 days after the onset of the primary human herpesvirus 6 infection. No other etiologic agent that might cause rhabdomyolysis was identified.

Early HHV-6 replication is associated with morbidity non-related to CMV infection after kidney transplantation

Human herpesvirus type 6-(HHV-6) has been associated with morbidity after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the HHV-6 seroprevalence among donor-recipient pairs, analyze the incidence of early active infection, its clinical manifestation, interaction with CMV, and the related morbidity in the first year after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

46 donor-recipient pairs had IgG evaluated by ELISA before transplantation: HHV-6(Pambio - USA) and CMV-(Roche - USA). A frozen whole blood sample collected weekly (from the 1st to the 6th week) was retrospectively tested for HHV-6 viral load (VL) determination by real time quantitative PCR (qPCR, Nanogen - Italy). Patients were preemptively surveyed for CMV by pp65 antigenemia (Ag, APAAP, immunohistochemistry, Biotest - Germany) from the 4th to the 12th week after transplantation. Active infection was defined as qPCR-HHV6+ (viral-load/mL-VL) and Ag+ (+cells/100.000 granulocytes), for HHV-6 and CMV, respectively. DCMV was defined as simultaneous positive antigenemia and suggestive signs/symptoms. Concerning +qPCR-HHV6, associated factors, clinical manifestation, interaction with CMV and morbidity were searched.

RESULTS

Pre-transplant HHV-6 seroprevalence was significantly higher among kidney recipients compared to their donors (82.6x54.8%; p = 0.005 [3.9 (1.4-10.4)]). Active infection by this virus occurred in 26.1% (12/46), with no association with previous IgG (p = 0.412). Median VL was 125 copies/mL (53-11.264), and the median Ag was 21 +cells (2-740). There was no association between HHV-6 and CMV activation after transplantation (p = 0.441), neither concerning DCMV (p = 0.596). Median highest Ag+ and days of ganciclovir treatment were similar between qPCR-HHV6 + or - (p = 0.206 and p = 0.124, respectively). qPCR-HHV6+ was associated with higher incidence of bacterial (p = 0.009) and fungal (p = 0.001) infections, and higher number (p = 0.001) of hospital admission and longer duration of hospitalization over the first 6 and 12 months post-transplantation (p = 0.033 and p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Latent HHV-6 infection is more common among recipients than donors before transplantation. Early active infection by this pathogen after transplantation does not increase DCMV incidence or severity during the first 3 months of follow-up. However, early HHV-6 replication is associated with other infections and hospitalizations in the first year.

High intrahepatic HHV-6 virus loads but neither CMV nor EBV are associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis, the relevance of herpesviruses is not well defined.

METHODS

Viral loads of CMV, EBV, and HHV-6 were determined in blood and liver biopsies of 170 liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

HHV-6-, CMV-, and EBV-DNA were detected in 58%, 14%, and 44% of the biopsies, respectively, with coinfections in 34%. High intrahepatic HHV-6 DNA levels (>75th percentile, 11.27 copies/1000 cells) and detection of HHV-6 DNAemia were significantly associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis (p=0.014 and p=0.003, respectively, median follow-up was 23.8 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed high intrahepatic HHV-6 loads as an independent factor associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.61, 95%confidence interval 1.16-5.87). Low concentrations of HHV6 DNA in the liver, indicating latent infection, did not influence graft survival. Neither CMV nor EBV (qualitative detection and high virus loads) nor acute rejection (according to the BANFF score) affected graft survival. However, patients had been treated for CMV reactivations and acute rejections in this retrospective study. High age and high bilirubin levels were the other independent factors associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 3.56CI 1.52-8.34 and 3.23CI 1.50-6.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High intrahepatic HHV-6-DNA levels are associated with decreased graft survival in liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis. The significance of HHV-6 as potential etiology of graft hepatitis needs further evaluation.

Prospective monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus and other herpesviruses in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with methotrexate and tocilizumab

Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used for the treatment of articular-type juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), but patients receiving MTX for rheumatoid arthritis have been reported to be at increased risk of reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and the development of lymphoproliferative disorder. The association between MTX and reactivation of herpesviruses in pediatric patients is not yet understood. We prospectively monitored the viral load of EBV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) in four JIA patients treated with MTX for 12-24 months. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody, was added to the therapeutic regimen in three patients during the observation period. Prior to the administration of MTX, EBV and HHV-6 were detected by PCR in two patients. Significant increases in EBV and HHV-6 load were not observed following the administration of MTX or tocilizumab. In one patient, a relatively high EBV load remained detectable during 21 months of observation in the absence of clinical symptoms. CMV was not detected throughout the observation period in any patient. This is the first report monitoring the longitudinal DNA loads of EBV and other herpesviruses in JIA patients. EBV and HHV-6 were often detectable, but treatment with MTX and tocilizumab did not appear to influence the viral load.

Primary HHV 6 infection after liver transplantation with acute graft rejection and multi-organ failure: successful treatment with a 2.5-fold dose of cidofovir and reduction of immunosuppression

HHV type 6 has been reported with enhanced pathogenicity in immunocompromised patients. Herein, we report about a two-yr-old girl who experienced primary HHV 6 infection after liver transplantation. She clinically presented with graft rejection and necrotic hepatitis as well as high fever, pneumonitis with respiratory failure and a rash. Therapy with cidofovir of 5 mg/kg per wk did not show improvement, so that a full pharmacokinetic profile of cidofovir was performed. It demonstrated enhanced body weight normalized clearance of cidofovir and cidofovir dosage was augmented to 12 mg/kg per wk to reach adequate drug exposure. With additional reduction of immunosuppression, the patient dramatically improved and liver function stabilized.

Kinetics of cytokine and chemokine responses in patients with primary human herpesvirus 6 infection

BACKGROUND

Cytokines and chemokines induced by human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection may play an important role in the observed HHV-6-associated clinical complications. However, basic data for cytokine and chemokine synthesis in primary HHV-6 infected patient without complication is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to elucidate basic kinetic data for expressions of cytokines and chemokines in patients with primary HHV-6 infection without complication.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-six patients suffering from fever were enrolled in this study. Fourteen biomarkers were measured in 74 serially collected sera samples from 26 patients. Additionally, serum samples obtained from 14 healthy children were used for control.

RESULTS

Twenty of the 26 patients were diagnosed with primary HHV-6 infection based on viral isolation and serological analysis. The mean age (P=0.1289) and proportion of males to females (P=0.9999) between the patients with and without primary HHV-6 infection were not statistically different. At the acute phase of the disease, three cytokines (IFN-γ; P=0.0046, IL-2; P=0.0366, and IL-4; P=0.0255) and one chemokine (MCP-1; P=0.0019) were significantly higher in patients with primary HHV-6 infection compared to those without infection. Interleukin-5 levels during the convalescent period were significantly higher in patients with HHV-6 infection (P=0.0205). By 1 month post-infection, cytokine and chemokine expression had returned to almost basal levels.

CONCLUSION

As suggested by the previous in vitro studies, present in vivo analysis also suggests that HHV-6 has potency for induction of cytokines and chemokines.

Impact of human herpes virus 6 in liver transplantation

Human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) infects > 95% of humans. Primary infection which occurs mostly during the first 2 years of life in the form of roseola infantum, non-specific febrile illness, or an asymptomatic illness, results in latency. Reactivation of latent HHV-6 is common after liver transplantation. Since the majority of human beings harbor the latent virus, HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are most probably caused by endogenous reactivation or superinfection. In a minority of cases, primary HHV-6 infection may occur when an HHV-6-seronegative individual receives a liver allograft from an HHV-6-seropositive donor. The vast majority of HHV-6 infections after liver transplantation are asymptomatic. Only in a minority of cases, when HHV-6 causes a febrile illness associated with rash and myelosuppression, hepatitis, gastroenteritis, pneumonitis, and encephalitis after liver transplantation. In addition, HHV-6 has been implicated in a variety of indirect effects, such as allograft rejection and increased predisposition to and severity of other infections, including cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C virus, and opportunistic fungi. Because of the uncommon nature of the clinical illnesses directly attributed to HHV-6, there is currently no recommended HHV-6-specific approach prevention after liver transplantation. Asymptomatic HHV-6 infection does not require antiviral treatment, while treatment of established HHV-6 disease is treated with intravenous ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir and this should be complemented by a reduction in immunosuppression.

Different expression of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) load in whole blood may have a significant impact on the diagnosis of active infection

BACKGROUND

Viral load in whole blood is the main virological marker for assessing HHV-6 infection and is used as an indication to begin antiviral therapy. Results are usually expressed as the number of genomic equivalent copies (gec) per mL of blood, although HHV-6 DNA in blood is mainly localized in lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

OBJECTIVES

Since leukocyte counts vary in immunocompromised patients, especially in stem cell transplant recipients, the aim of this study was to compare HHV-6 load expressed as gec per mL with load expressed as gec per million cells (mc), using quantitative real-time PCR for HHV-6 and cell DNA.

STUDY DESIGN

194 blood samples from 101 patients were analyzed. Leukocyte count was obtained for 142 samples.

RESULTS

The two modes of expression were incompletely correlated (p<0.0001; R(2)=0.732). To understand this relative discrepancy, samples were classified according to hematological criteria (normal leukocyte count, leukopenia, agranulocytosis, lymphopenia). The expression modes were correlated in all cases except for agranulocytosis (p=0.21; R(2)=0.087). Moreover, the median of ratio between gec per mc and gec per mL ranged from 0.5 when leukocyte count was normal, to 8.2 in cases of agranulocytosis. HHV-6 load follow-up suggested that in agranulocytosis expressing results as gec per mc tended to provide a more representative result.

CONCLUSIONS

The different expression of HHV-6 load in whole blood, as either gec per mL or gec per mc resulted in different estimations of infection in the case of agranulocytosis. In this situation, the latter mode of expression is preferred.

Simultaneous monitoring by real-time polymerase chain reaction of epstein-barr virus, human cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus-6 in juvenile and adult liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) cause symptomatic diseases in liver transplant recipients. The loads of these viruses, the associations between viral DNAemia, serologic status, and acute rejection reactions were investigated in a group of 17 juvenile and 17 adult recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for a median of 8 weeks posttransplantation. At least 1 plasma sample from 15/34 (44.1%) patients was positive for CMV DNA. For most of the CMV-positive patients, the CMV DNA appeared in the second week of LDLT, and disappeared by the eighth week. A minimum of 200 EBV DNA copies/mug peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA (defined as positive for EBV) was detected in 5/34 (14.7%) patients, and the number of EBV-positive children was significantly greater than the number of EBV-positive adults. In most of the EBV-positive patients, the EBV loads increased after 4 weeks posttransplantation. Plasma HHV-6 was detected in 7/34 (20.6%) patients. HHV-6 DNA appeared for a short period from the second week of LDLT. In addition, 8 of the 19 virus-positive recipients carried 2 viruses, with the combination of CMV and HHV-6 being the most frequent. Serologic status seemed to be an important factor for all 3 viral infections. The rate of acute cellular rejection was not significantly higher in the CMV-, EBV-, or HHV-6-positive groups. Simultaneous monitoring for 3 herpesviruses revealed the impact of these viruses on LDLT recipients.

Human herpesvirus-6 infections and infection-preventative measures in transplant recipients

Like the other herpesviruses, human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 is capable of persisting in the host after primary infection and can reactivate under immunosuppressed conditions. In stem cell transplantation recipients, HHV-6 reactivation is observed in 40–50% of patients and is linked to various clinical manifestations, including rash, delayed platelet engraftment and encephalopathy. HHV-6 reactivation is also relatively common in solid organ transplantation recipients, and is associated with graft dysfunction and subsequent development of human cytomegalovirus disease. In particular, HHV-6 has been recognized as a life-threatening pathogen for the development of encephalopathy after stem cell transplantation. Ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir are effective against HHV-6 in vitro. However, success rates are not high for patients who have developed encephalopathy. Plasma HHV-6 DNA-guided pre-emptive approaches have not been successful owing to the dynamic kinetics of HHV-6 reactivation. Establishment of optimal strategies is needed to prevent HHV-6-associated complications, in particular encephalopathy.