Donor factor V Leiden mutation and vascular thrombosis following liver transplantation

Donor-derived disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis in liver transplantation: Considerations for deceased donor liver selection

OLT is known to be associated with a precarious perioperative hemostatic state due to dysregulation of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, endothelial injury, and inflammation. Transmission of inherited bleeding and clotting disorders from the liver donor to the recipient may further complicate hemostasis during and after transplantation. As a result, consideration of congenital coagulation disorders in the liver donor is a practical concern for donor selection. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the selection of donors with known or suspected thrombophilia or bleeding disorders. While multiple case reports and retrospective studies, subject to reporting bias, describe donor-derived thrombophilic and bleeding disorders, there are no large-scale studies in the adult liver transplant literature that examine the frequency of transmission, utility of donor screening, or clinical impact of donor hemostatic disorders. Based on the reported literature, we summarize our approach for donor selection with an aim to balance improved organ utility and optimal post-transplant outcomes.

Complications of Factor V Leiden in Adults Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Factor V Leiden is the commonest hereditary prothrombotic allele, affecting 1% to 5% of the world's population. The objective of this study was to characterize the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with Factor V Leiden compared to patients without a diagnosis of hereditary thrombophilia. This was a focused systematic review of studies including adult (>18 years) patients with Factor V Leiden (heterozygous or homozygous) undergoing noncardiac surgery. Included studies were either randomized controlled trials or observational. The primary clinical outcomes of interest were thromboembolic events occurring from the perioperative period up to 1 year postoperatively, defined as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other clinically significant thrombosis occurring during or after a surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events, cardiac events, death, transplant-related outcomes, and surgery-specific morbidity. Pediatric and obstetrical patients were excluded, as were case reports and case series. Databases searched included MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until August 2021. Study bias was assessed through the CLARITY (Collaboration of McMaster University researchers) Risk of Bias tools, and heterogeneity through analysis of study design and end points, as well as the I 2 statistic with its confidence interval and the Q statistic. A total of 5275 potentially relevant studies were identified, with 115 having full text assessed for eligibility and 32 included in the systematic review. On the whole, the literature suggests that patients with Factor V Leiden have an increased risk of perioperative and postoperative thromboembolic events compared to patients without the diagnosis. Increased risk was also seen in relation to surgery-specific morbidity and transplant-related outcomes, particularly arterial thrombotic events. The literature did not support an increased risk for mortality, cerebrovascular, or cardiac complications. Limitations of the data include predisposition toward bias due in many study designs and small sample sizes across the majority of published studies. Variable outcome definitions and durations of patient follow-up across different surgical procedures resulted in high study heterogeneity precluding the effective use of meta-analysis. Factor V Leiden status may confer additional risk for surgery-related adverse outcomes. Large, adequately powered studies are required to accurately estimate the degree of this risk by zygosity.

Donor genetic variants as risk factors for thrombosis after liver transplantation: A genome-wide association study

Thrombosis after liver transplantation substantially impairs graft- and patient survival. Inevitably, heritable disorders of coagulation originating in the donor liver are transmitted by transplantation. We hypothesized that genetic variants in donor thrombophilia genes are associated with increased risk of posttransplant thrombosis. We genotyped 775 donors for adult recipients and 310 donors for pediatric recipients transplanted between 1993 and 2018. We determined the association between known donor thrombophilia gene variants and recipient posttransplant thrombosis. In addition, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and meta-analyzed 1085 liver transplantations. In our donor cohort, known thrombosis risk loci were not associated with posttransplant thrombosis, suggesting that it is unnecessary to exclude liver donors based on thrombosis-susceptible polymorphisms. By performing a meta-GWAS from children and adults, we identified 280 variants in 55 loci at suggestive genetic significance threshold. Downstream prioritization strategies identified biologically plausible candidate genes, among which were AK4 (rs11208611-T, p = 4.22 × 10^-05 ) which encodes a protein that regulates cellular ATP levels and concurrent activation of AMPK and mTOR, and RGS5 (rs10917696-C, p = 2.62 × 10^-05 ) which is involved in vascular development. We provide evidence that common genetic variants in the donor, but not previously known thrombophilia-related variants, are associated with increased risk of thrombosis after liver transplantation.

Perioperative Thromboelastometry for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tendency to Hypercoagulability: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Hypercoagulability can lead to serious thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative coagulation status in liver transplant recipients with a tendency to hypercoagulability.

Methods

In a prospective observational study (South African Cochrane Registry 201405000814129), 151 potential liver transplant recipients were screened for thrombophilic factors from October 2014 to June 2017, and 57 potential recipients fulfilled the inclusion criterion of presenting two or more of the following thrombophilic factors: low protein C, low protein S, low anti-thrombin, increased homocystein, increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, increased lupus anticoagulant, and positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Seven patients were excluded from the study because they fulfilled the exclusion criteria of cancelling the liver transplantation, oral anticoagulation, or intraoperative treatment with rFVIIa. Accordingly, 50 patients were included in the final analysis. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM) and conventional coagulation tests (CCT) were performed preoperatively, during the anhepatic phase, post reperfusion, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 7. ROTEM was used to guide blood product transfusion. Heparin was infused (60-180 U/kg/day) postoperatively for 3 days and then was replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (20 mg/12 h).

Results

FIBTEM MCF significantly increased postoperatively above reference range on POD 7 despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations (p < 0.05). Both EXTEM and INTEM demonstrated significant changes with the phases of transplantation (p < 0.05), but with no intra- or postoperative hypercoagulability observed. INTEM CT (reference range, 100-240 s) normalized on POD 3 and 7 (196.1 ± 69.0 and 182.7 ± 63.8 s, respectively), despite prolonged aPTT (59.7 ± 18.7 and 46.4 ± 15.7 s, respectively; reference range, 20-40 s). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were reported in 12.0% and 2.0%, respectively, mainly after critical care discharge and with high FIBTEM MCF values in 57% on POD 3 and 86% on POD 7. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses of FIBTEM MCF were significant predictors for thromboembolic events with optimum cut-off, area under the curve and standard error on POD 3 (>23 mm, 0.779 and 0.097; p = 0.004) and POD 7 (>28 mm, 0.706 and 0.089; p = 0.020). Red blood cells (mean ± SD, 8.68 ± 5.81 units) were transfused in 76%, fresh frozen plasma (8.26 ± 4.14 units) in 62%, and cryoprecipitate (12.0 ± 3.68 units) in 28% of recipients. None of the recipients received intraoperative platelet transfusion or any postoperative transfusion. Main transplant indication was hepatitis C infection in 82%. 76% of recipients included in this highly selected patient population showed increased lupus anticoagulant, 2% increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, 20% increased homocysteine, 74% decreased anti-thrombin, 78% decreased protein C, 34% decreased protein S, and 24% a positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Overall 1-year survival was 62%.

Conclusion

A significant postoperative step-wise increase in FIBTEM MCF beyond the reference range was observed despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations, and FIBTEM MCF was a predictor for thromboembolic events in this study population, particularly after POD 3 and 7 on surgical wards when CCTs failed to detect this condition. However, the predictive value of FIBTEM MCF for postoperative HAT and PVT needs to be confirmed in a larger patient population. A ROTEM-guided anticoagulation regime needs to be developed and investigated in future studies.

Perioperative Thromboelastometry for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tendency to Hypercoagulability: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Hypercoagulability can lead to serious thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative coagulation status in liver transplant recipients with a tendency to hypercoagulability.

Methods

In a prospective observational study (South African Cochrane Registry 201405000814129), 151 potential liver transplant recipients were screened for thrombophilic factors from October 2014 to June 2017, and 57 potential recipients fulfilled the inclusion criterion of presenting two or more of the following thrombophilic factors: low protein C, low protein S, low anti-thrombin, increased homocystein, increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, increased lupus anticoagulant, and positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Seven patients were excluded from the study because they fulfilled the exclusion criteria of cancelling the liver transplantation, oral anticoagulation, or intraoperative treatment with rFVIIa. Accordingly, 50 patients were included in the final analysis. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM) and conventional coagulation tests (CCT) were performed preoperatively, during the anhepatic phase, post reperfusion, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 7. ROTEM was used to guide blood product transfusion. Heparin was infused (60-180 U/kg/day) postoperatively for 3 days and then was replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (20 mg/12 h).

Results

FIBTEM MCF significantly increased postoperatively above reference range on POD 7 despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations (p < 0.05). Both EXTEM and INTEM demonstrated significant changes with the phases of transplantation (p < 0.05), but with no intra- or postoperative hypercoagulability observed. INTEM CT (reference range, 100-240 s) normalized on POD 3 and 7 (196.1 ± 69.0 and 182.7 ± 63.8 s, respectively), despite prolonged aPTT (59.7 ± 18.7 and 46.4 ± 15.7 s, respectively; reference range, 20-40 s). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were reported in 12.0% and 2.0%, respectively, mainly after critical care discharge and with high FIBTEM MCF values in 57% on POD 3 and 86% on POD 7. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses of FIBTEM MCF were significant predictors for thromboembolic events with optimum cut-off, area under the curve and standard error on POD 3 (>23 mm, 0.779 and 0.097; p = 0.004) and POD 7 (>28 mm, 0.706 and 0.089; p = 0.020). Red blood cells (mean ± SD, 8.68 ± 5.81 units) were transfused in 76%, fresh frozen plasma (8.26 ± 4.14 units) in 62%, and cryoprecipitate (12.0 ± 3.68 units) in 28% of recipients. None of the recipients received intraoperative platelet transfusion or any postoperative transfusion. Main transplant indication was hepatitis C infection in 82%. 76% of recipients included in this highly selected patient population showed increased lupus anticoagulant, 2% increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, 20% increased homocysteine, 74% decreased anti-thrombin, 78% decreased protein C, 34% decreased protein S, and 24% a positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Overall 1-year survival was 62%.

Conclusion

A significant postoperative step-wise increase in FIBTEM MCF beyond the reference range was observed despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations, and FIBTEM MCF was a predictor for thromboembolic events in this study population, particularly after POD 3 and 7 on surgical wards when CCTs failed to detect this condition. However, the predictive value of FIBTEM MCF for postoperative HAT and PVT needs to be confirmed in a larger patient population. A ROTEM-guided anticoagulation regime needs to be developed and investigated in future studies.

Recipient and donor thrombophilia and the risk of portal venous thrombosis and hepatic artery thrombosis in liver recipients

Background

Vascular complications, such as HAT, are an important cause of graft loss and recipient mortality. We aimed to characterize post-transplant thrombotic events in a cohort of liver transplant recipients, and identify independent risk factors for these complications.

Methods

We conducted a thrombophilic study of 293 orthotopic liver transplants performed in the Digestive Surgery Department of the 12 de Octubre Hospital (Madrid, Spain) between January 2001 and December 2006.

Results

The most frequent post-transplant thrombotic events were HAT (9%) and PVT (1.7%). The one variable associated with post-transplant thrombotic event was a high fibrinogen level in the global cohort of liver transplantation. But toxicity as event post-OLT has been associated with post-transplant thrombotic event in the retrospective group and high fibrinogen level and low protein C levels were associated post-transplant thrombotic event in the prospective group. Liver disease relapse (HR 6.609, p < 0.001), high levels of FVIII (HR 1.008, p = 0.019)) and low levels of antithrombin (HR 0.946, p < 0.001) were associated with poor overall survival (OS).

In conclusion, high fibrinogen and decreased protein C levels were associated with allograft thrombosis. Further studies are required in order to assess the clinical relevance of these parameters in prospective studies and to study the effect of anticoagulation prophylaxis in this group of risk.

Genetic polymorphisms and the fate of the transplanted organ

There has been an abundance of publications describing genetic variability in molecules affecting innate and adaptive immunity, pharmacogenetics, and other nonimmunological factors like the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system, coagulation, and fibrosis markers. Studies indicated some associations between polymorphisms in these candidate genes with outcomes in organ transplantation and underlined a potential role of genetic variability in transplantation. To be clinically applicable, large prospective studies must be performed to better define the potential benefits of genotyping on these genetic markers and clinical outcomes. The purposes of this review are to summarize recent data describing associations of polymorphisms in both immunological and nonimmunological molecules with transplant outcomes, with a particular emphasis on renal transplantation, and discuss limitations and clinical implications.

Meta-analysis of risk for relapse to substance use after transplantation of the liver or other solid organs

For patients receiving liver or other organ transplants for diseases associated with substance use, risk for relapse posttransplantation is a prominent clinical concern. However, there is little consensus regarding either the prevalence or risk factors for relapse to alcohol or illicit drug use in these patients. Moreover, the evidence is inconsistent as to whether patients with pretransplantation substance use histories show poorer posttransplantation medical adherence. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies published between 1983 and 2005 to estimate relapse rates, rates of nonadherence to the medical regimen, and the association of potential risk factors with these rates. The analysis included 54 studies (50 liver, 3 kidney, and 1 heart). Average alcohol relapse rates (examined only in liver studies) were 5.6 cases per 100 patients per year (PPY) for relapse to any alcohol use and 2.5 cases per 100 PPY for relapse with heavy alcohol use. Illicit drug relapse averaged 3.7 cases per 100 PPY, with a significantly lower rate in liver vs. other recipients (1.9 vs. 6.1 cases). Average rates in other areas (tobacco use, immunosuppressant and clinic appointment nonadherence) were 2 to 10 cases per 100 PPY. Risk factors could be examined only for relapse to any alcohol use. Demographics and most pretransplantation characteristics showed little correlation with relapse. Poorer social support, family alcohol history, and pretransplantation abstinence of < or =6 months showed small but significant associations with relapse (r = 0.17-0.21). Future research should focus on improving the prediction of risk for substance use relapse, and on testing interventions to promote continued abstinence posttransplantation.

Management of Hereditary Hypercoagulable Disorders

The clinical management of individuals with hereditary hypercoaguable disorders has evolved from initial broad recommendations of lifelong anticoagulation after first event of venous thromboembolism to a more intricate individualized risk-benefit analysis as studies have begun to delineate the complexity of interactions of acquired and hereditary factors which determine the predilection to thrombosis. The contribution of thrombophilic disorders to risk of thrombotic complications of pregnancy, organ transplantation, central venous catheter and dialysis access placement have been increasingly recognized. The risk of thrombosis must be weighed against risk of long-term anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism. Thrombophilia screening in select populations may enhance outcome.

Factor V Leiden and hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and other thrombophilias can be acquired during liver transplantation and can have a significant impact on clinical outcomes as well as cost. Standard practice does not include screening deceased donors for heritable thrombophilias, even if they have a personal history of thrombosis. Here we report a case of hepatic artery thrombosis in a liver recipient whose native and donor livers were heterozygous for FVL. The patient subsequently underwent a successful retransplant. FVL and its variants are expressed phenotypically as activated protein C (APC) resistance. We believe that testing liver donors (deceased or living) for APC resistance - a surrogate marker for the most common liver-based thrombophilia - will reduce the incidence of thrombotic events by identifying a need for posttransplant prophylactic anticoagulation in patients at risk. The estimated cost of testing all liver donors in the US for APC resistance is less than the cost of two complications secondary to thrombosis. Testing for APC resistance may further improve outcome and reduce cost after liver transplantation.

Resistance to Activated Protein C Caused by Factor V Leiden Mutation and Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Factor V (FV)-dependent resistance to activated protein C (APCR) is most likely caused by a point mutation in the FV gene, the so-called FV Leiden mutation (FV:Q506), which is a common risk factor predisposing to venous thromboembolism. Little is known about the role of FV:Q506 in recipients of human liver grafts and the significance of acquired APCR caused by orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

We screened blood samples of 720 patients who underwent OLT by genotyping for FV:Q506 and by testing for APCR with two highly FV-specific tests. Apart from the existing medical records, we obtained clinical data from 551 patients on thromboembolic events (TEs) by means of a questionnaire.

RESULTS

We found 49 (6.8%) heterozygous carriers of FV:Q who did not show APCR after OLT. One patient, heterozygous for FV:Q506, displayed APCR after OLT. In 35 (4.9%) noncarriers of FV:Q we detected APCR after OLT. In comparison with noncarriers, carriers of FV:Q506 demonstrated more TE before transplantation (7% vs. 28%, P<0.0005; relative risk 4.0 [95% confidence interval, 2.3-6.9]); this was also true for Budd-Chiari syndrome (1.8% vs. 10%, P<0.005). At a median follow-up of 5 years (0, 13-12 years), we found a higher incidence of TE after transplantation in patients with "acquired" APCR (16.7% vs. 4,3%; P=0.01; relative risk 3.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.7-9.0]), which included one patient with life-threatening TE during the early postoperative phase.

CONCLUSIONS

APCR caused by FV:Q506 before OLT is a risk factor for TE. OLT-related "acquired" APCR should be considered a risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

Activated protein C resistance acquired through liver transplantation

Coagulation factors are produced by the liver. It is well recognized that liver transplantation can cure haemophilia. We described a case of thrombophilia acquired due to liver transplantation from a donor with heritable thrombophilia.

Liver transplantation as definitive treatment for a factor V Leiden mutation

Liver transplantation (LT) was achieved for factor V Leiden-induced thrombophilia in a neonate with hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Initial LT was performed with a liver segment removed from a child with primary oxalosis. Four months later, a second, definitive LT was performed. The child remains well without recurrent thrombosis.

Coagulation: consultative hemostasis

Clinical hematologists are frequently consulted for the care of hospitalized patients with complicated coagulopathies. This chapter provides an update on the scientific and clinical advances noted in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and discusses the challenges in hemostasis consultation. In Section I, Dr. Marcel Levi reviews advances in our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of DIC. Novel therapeutic strategies that have been developed and evaluated in patients with DIC are discussed, as are the clinical trials performed in patients with sepsis. In Section II, Dr. Lawrence Leung provides an overview of the challenging problems in thrombosis encountered in the inpatient setting. Patients with deep vein thrombosis that is refractory to conventional anticoagulation and those with extensive mesenteric thrombosis as well as the evaluation of a positive PF4/heparin ELISA in a post-operative setting are discussed. Novel treatments for recurrent catheter thrombosis in dialysis patients is addressed as well. In Section III, Dr. Julie Hambleton reviews the hemostatic complications of solid organ transplantation. Coagulopathy associated with liver transplantation, contribution of underlying thrombophilia to graft thrombosis, drug-induced microangiopathy, and the indication for postoperative prophylaxis are emphasized. Dr. Hambleton reviews the clinical trials evaluating hemostatic agents in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Recurrent deep-vein thrombosis based on homozygous factor V Leiden mutation acquired after liver transplantation

Several genetic liver diseases can be treated by liver transplantation (LT). However, some genetic defects also may be acquired by this procedure. We describe a patient who developed recurrent deep-vein thromboses after LT for hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma on the basis of a homozygous Leiden mutation of the factor V gene in the donor liver. Liver donors with a history of venous thrombosis should be screened for the presence of activated protein C (APC) resistance. In addition, we recommend looking for APC resistance in liver recipients who develop venous thromboembolic disease in the post-LT course. Molecular analysis of donor tissue may be necessary to make a definite diagnosis of factor V Leiden mutation in these patients. As a consequence, intensified postoperative thromboprophylaxis or lifelong anticoagulant therapy may be necessary if this thrombophilic gene defect is detected.

Activated protein C resistance acquired through liver transplantation and associated with recurrent venous thrombosis

We report a new case of recurrent, extra-hepatic, deep vein thrombosis occurring after orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma complicating 'mixed' alcoholic and post-hepatitic C cirrhosis. Coagulation tests showed activated protein C resistance. The patient's genomic DNA was negative for the factor V Leiden mutation. Analysis of the grafted liver DNA showed that the donor was a heterozygous carrier of the factor V Leiden mutation and that the recipient's activated protein C resistance was acquired through the transplantation. Screening of candidate liver donors for a prothrombotic tendency is controversial. However, this case suggests that patients who develop venous thrombosis after liver transplantation should be screened for thrombophilic abnormalities, bearing in mind that genetic abnormalities which do not affect clotting test results, such as the G20210A mutation in the factor II gene, can only be diagnosed by testing the donor or graft.

Genetic variability and transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances within the area of genetic polymorphisms with a specific emphasis on renal transplantation, and to discuss the potential clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to recent advances in molecular techniques, there has been an abundance of publications describing genetic variability in molecules relevant to transplant outcome. Many studies are now demonstrating associations between polymorphisms in these candidate genes and outcomes in organ transplantation.

SUMMARY

These studies emphasize the potential role of genetic variability in transplantation, and provide the rationale for large prospective studies to clearly define the potential benefits of genotyping in the risk stratification of transplant recipients.

Psychosocial challenges in transplantation

The authors review the psychosocial aspects of transplantation. They first review psychosocial risk factors that place transplant patients at higher risk for noncompliance and negative outcomes. They then discuss what assessments should be included in a pretransplantation psychosocial evaluation. Goals of the psychosocial evaluation include selection of candidates most likely to benefit from transplantation and identification of areas for psychosocial intervention, both before and after transplantation. The assessment should address the patient's premorbid psychiatric state, past adaptation to stressors, history of compliance with treatment, substance abuse history, and level of social support, including community and faith-based support systems. Results of psychometric assessments may be helpful when considered in conjunction with a clinical interview and other sources of information about the patient. It may also be helpful to use a screening tool developed specifically to evaluate psychosocial factors relevant to transplantation, such as the Psychological Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) scale and the Transplantation Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS). The authors then review issues related to psychopharmacologic interventions in transplant patients, including the use of antidepressant medication pre- and post-transplant, strategies for avoiding delirium associated with immunosuppressive medications immediately post-transplantation, neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with interferon alpha therapy for hepatitis C, and interactions between over-the-counter and herbal agents (e.g., St. John's Wort) and immunosuppressive agents. Although limited research has been done on nonpharmacologic interventions, such as transplant support groups, it appears that certain types of group therapy, in particular, cognitive-behavioral groups that target specific risk factors such as depression, distress, and compliance, may also offer promising approaches for dealing with the problems of transplant patients. The authors then focus on two special situations that create particular problems for transplantation teams: liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and obesity in transplant patients. The authors conclude that the prognosis for patients with ALD who receive liver transplantation is similar to that of non-alcoholics and that alcoholism is not a contraindication for liver transplantation. However, careful preliminary psychosocial assessment is essential to review candidates for factors that are predictive of relapse, while close follow-up post-transplantation can help improve outcomes. It appears that obesity can increase the risk of negative outcomes in transplant patients, although there is currently no consensus on the use of obesity as an exclusion criteria. Interventions that take into account the special psychological and medical needs of transplant patients need to be developed for treating obesity both pre- and post-transplantation. Improved strategies for identifying high-risk patients and finding ways to intervene both pre- and post-transplantation can not only help lengthen transplant recipients' life spans, but also improve their adaptation to transplantation and lead to improved quality of life.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: long term follow-up and impact of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND

Alcoholic liver disease has emerged as a leading indication for hepatic transplantation, although it is a controversial use of resources. We aimed to examine all aspects of liver transplantation associated with alcohol abuse.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of 123 alcoholic patients with a median of 7 years follow-up at one center.

RESULTS

In addition to alcohol, 43 (35%) patients had another possible factor contributing to cirrhosis. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates were, respectively, 84% and 81% (1 year); 72% and 66% (5 years); and 63% and 59% (7 years). After transplantation, 18 patients (15%) manifested 21 noncutaneous de novo malignancies, which is significantly more than controls (P=0.0001); upper aerodigestive squamous carcinomas were overrepresented (P=0.03). Thirteen patients had definitely relapsed and three others were suspected to have relapsed. Relapse was predicted by daily ethanol consumption (P=0.0314), but not by duration of pretransplant sobriety or explant histology. No patient had alcoholic hepatitis after transplantation and neither late onset acute nor chronic rejection was significantly increased. Multiple regression analyses for predictors of graft failure identified major biliary/vascular complications (P=0.01), chronic bile duct injury on biopsy (P=0.002), and pericellular fibrosis on biopsy (P=0.05); graft viral hepatitis was marginally significant (P=0.07) on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for liver transplantation in those without coexistent conditions. Recurrent alcoholic liver disease alone is not an important cause of graft pathology or failure. Potential recipients should be heavily screened before transplantation for coexistent conditions (e.g., hepatitis C, metabolic diseases) and other target-organ damage, especially aerodigestive malignancy, which are greater causes of morbidity and mortality than is recurrent alcohol liver disease.

Risk factors for failure to meet listing requirements in liver transplant candidates with alcoholic cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The majority of liver transplant centers require a 6-month abstinence period before listing candidates for liver transplantation with alcoholic cirrhosis and a persistent sobriety thereafter. We attempted to identify risk factors for failure to comply with these requirements.

METHODS

Ninety-nine consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were referred for liver transplant evaluation between September 1996 and May 1998. The mean age was 49 years, 74% were male, and 54% were hepatitis C virus positive. To be listed, patients had to meet the following requirements. All patients received extensive psychosocial evaluations and were frequently monitored with random urine and blood alcohol tests; patients found positive were excluded or removed from the liver transplant waiting list. Detailed patient information was entered into a computerized database, and 36 discreet variables were analyzed in relation to success (patient listed and remained on the list) or failure (not listed or removed from the list based on noncompliance).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were successfully listed. Nineteen received a transplant, with a 95% 1-year patient and graft survival rate and 21% alcohol relapse rate after transplantation. Twenty-two patients had either medical contraindication and/or died before transplant listing. Twenty-four patients were never listed and four were removed from the list due to recurrent alcoholism, for a total of 28 failures. Our statistical analysis identified five significant risk factors for failure: (I) living arrangement (alone/family versus community/friend), P=0.006; (II) history of suicide ideation, P=0.03; (III) history of previous alcohol-related hospitalization, P=0.01; (IV) lack of previous alcoholic rehabilitation before transplant evaluation, P=0.001; and (V) failure to accept further alcoholic rehabilitation before orthotopic liver transplantation, P=0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience confirms that transplantation can be extremely successful in properly selected patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. We identified several predictive psychosocial factors of early alcoholic recidivism in transplant candidates.

Employment and alcohol use after liver transplantation for alcoholic and nonalcoholic liver disease: a systematic review

The purpose of the study is to evaluate patterns of employment and alcohol use among liver transplant recipients with alcoholic (ALD) and nonalcoholic liver disease (non-ALD). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographic searches identified 5,505 potentially relevant articles published between January 1966 and October 1998. Eighty-two studies reporting data on 5,020 transplant recipients met our inclusion criteria. Pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), 29% of transplant recipients with ALD and 59% of those with non-ALD worked versus 33% and 80% at 3 years for transplant recipients with ALD and non-ALD, respectively (P <.00001 for each interval). We found no difference in the proportion of transplant recipients with ALD and non-ALD reporting early alcohol use post-OLT: 4% versus 5% at 6 months and 17% versus 16% at 12 months. However, among post-OLT drinkers, transplant recipients with non-ALD were more likely to drink moderately and those with ALD to drink excessively. At 7 years post-OLT, 32% of the patients with ALD reported using alcohol. The odds ratio for alcohol use among patients who maintained abstinence for fewer than 6 months pre-OLT versus those who maintained abstinence for greater than 6 months was 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 4.0 to 15.3). Before OLT and at long-term follow-up, substantially more transplant recipients with non-ALD than ALD were employed. The proportions of transplant recipients with ALD and non-ALD reporting alcohol use did not differ, although those with ALD tended to consume greater quantities.

Hepatic artery thrombosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of nonsurgical causes

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the principal causes of morbidity and graft loss following liver transplantation. There are several risk factors for the development of HAT; technical aspects of the arterial anastomosis are important particularly for early thrombosis, but the improvement of surgical technique has lessened this problem. Apart from technical causes, other risk factors include a variety of conditions such as low donor/recipient age ratio, immunologic factors, clotting abnormalities, tobacco use, and infections. In particular, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of endothelial cells has been recently suggested as an infective cause of HAT, as it is known to be followed by a rapid procoagulant response. Thus, latent CMV in an allograft may become activated and promote or contribute to vascular thrombosis. This review evaluates these aspects, focusing on data relating CMV infection or viremia to HAT following liver transplantation.

Quality of life after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

There are few data on predictive factors for alcohol relapse or long-term functional outcome after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). In all 56 surviving UK patients (47 men, 9 women; mean age: 51 years; range: 33 to 69 years) who underwent transplantation for ALD at King's College Hospital over a 10-year period, alcohol relapse and outcome were assessed by outpatient and case-note review and by postal questionnaire containing (1) the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), (2) the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, and (3) a drug and alcohol questionnaire. At a median of 2.5 years (range: 0.5 to 10 years), 13 of the 47 respondents (28%) and 2 of the 9 nonrespondents (22%) had evidence of potentially harmful drinking (>3 units daily) at some time posttransplantation. An additional 13 patients admitted to drinking some alcohol at least once, corresponding to an overall relapse rate of 50%. The patients with harmful drinking (1) had started drinking regularly at a younger age (18 v 25 years; P =.01), (2) began drinking heavily at a younger age (30 v 40 years; P =.01), (3) had shorter pretransplantation abstinence periods (10 v 23 months; P =.02), and (4) had a longer time since transplantation (median, 5.7 v 1.5 years; P =.0004) than those with no or mild alcohol relapse. They were also more likely to report sleep disturbance (NHP sleep problem score, 45 v 16; P =.01) and use benzodiazepines regularly (7 of 13 v 3 of 34 patients; P =.002). Despite these differences, health dimension scores in the SF-36 and NHP posttransplantation were similar between the groups and to those of UK community controls. In the long term, at least 50% of the patients will drink again at some time posttransplantation, although at lower levels of alcohol intake than previously. Those patients with multiple predictive factors for alcohol relapse may be at greatest risk for harmful drinking and be the group that would benefit most from professional counseling. Overall, the quality of life after liver transplantation for ALD is high and broadly similar to the levels expected in the normal population.

Allograft loss in renal transplant recipients with Fabry's disease and activated protein C resistance

INTRODUCTION

Fabry's disease is associated with an increased incidence of thrombotic events and rejection. Spontaneous thrombosis of a functioning cadaveric renal allograft in a recipient with Fabry's disease prompted prospective evaluation of all transplant candidates with Fabry's disease for hypercoagulability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transplant candidates with Fabry's disease were tested for hypercoagulability, analyzed for HLA-type and ABO group, and comorbid conditions suggestive of hypercoagulability.

RESULTS

A unique association of Fabry's disease with activated protein C Resistance was documented in a cohort of Caucasian male renal transplant recipients with Fabry's disease. Four of five patients were blood group A and had no significant comorbid conditions suggestive of hypercoagulability. The resistance to activation of protein C (APCR)(+) patients shared HLA loci-B8 and Dr3, although the APCR(-) patients shared HLA loci-B27 and -B38.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the observed increase in the incidence of APCR in our Fabry's cohort, we suggest screening all patients with Fabry's disease for APCR. Because factor V and factor Va receptors are found on vascular endothelium and peripheral blood monocytes, APCR in the presence of Fabry's disease may be a nonimmunological stimulus for rejection. Analysis of HLA typing in patients with Fabry's disease may further elucidate HLA-based association of Fabry's disease and resistance to activated protein C with the risk of thrombosis and rejection.

The factor V Leiden mutation: a possible contributor to the hepatic artery thrombosis encountered after liver transplantation in a child

A 10-year-old girl has experienced 3 recurrences of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after a liver transplantation. She responded to intraarterial administrations of urokinase after the first 2 attacks. However, the restoration of the arterial flow was not possible after the third attack. The child and her father were both heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation. In addition to the technical factors, the factor V Leiden mutation should be considered as a factor that plays a role in HAT.