1
|
Kielly M, Caracciolo A, Chacon A, Vohradsky J, Di Vita D, Hamato A, Tashima H, Franklin DR, Yamaya T, Rosenfeld A, Carminati M, Fiorini C, Guatelli S, Safavi-Naeini M. First experimental demonstration of real-time neutron capture discrimination in helium and carbon ion therapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2601. [PMID: 38297114 PMCID: PMC10831067 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52162-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
This work provides the first experimental proof of an increased neutron capture photon signal following the introduction of boron to a PMMA phantom during helium and carbon ion therapies in Neutron Capture Enhanced Particle Therapy (NCEPT). NCEPT leverages [Formula: see text]B neutron capture, leading to the emission of detectable 478 keV photons. Experiments were performed at the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba, Japan, with two Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) targets, one bearing a boron insert. The BeNEdiCTE gamma-ray detector measured an increase in the 478 keV signal of 45 ± 7% and 26 ± 2% for carbon and helium ion irradiation, respectively. Our Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation model, developed to investigate photon origins, found less than 30% of detected photons originated from the insert, while boron in the detector's circuit boards contributed over 65%. Further, the model investigated detector sensitivity, establishing its capability to record a 10% increase in 478 keV photon detection at a target [Formula: see text]B concentration of 500 ppm using spectral windowing alone, and 25% when combined with temporal windowing. The linear response extended to concentrations up to 20,000 ppm. The increase in the signal in all evaluated cases confirm the potential of the proposed detector design for neutron capture quantification in NCEPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Kielly
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Anita Caracciolo
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrew Chacon
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, Australia
| | - James Vohradsky
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Davide Di Vita
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Akram Hamato
- Imaging Physics Group, Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Inage-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideaki Tashima
- Imaging Physics Group, Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Inage-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel R Franklin
- School of Electrical and Data Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Taiga Yamaya
- Imaging Physics Group, Department of Advanced Nuclear Medicine Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Inage-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Marco Carminati
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fiorini
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Guatelli
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Mitra Safavi-Naeini
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Lucas Heights, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ekinci F, Acici K, Asuroglu T, Emek Soylu B. MC TRIM Algorithm in Mandibula Phantom in Helium Therapy. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2523. [PMID: 37761719 PMCID: PMC10530776 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy, one of the particle therapies developed and studied in the 1950s for cancer treatment, resulted in clinical trials starting at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 1975. While proton and carbon ion therapies have been implemented in research institutions and hospitals globally after the end of the trials, progress in comprehending the physical, biological, and clinical findings of helium ion beam therapy has been limited, particularly due to its limited accessibility. Ongoing efforts aim to establish programs that evaluate the use of helium ion beams for clinical and research purposes, especially in the treatment of sensitive clinical cases. Additionally, helium ions have superior physical properties to proton beams, such as lower lateral scattering and larger LET. Moreover, they exhibit similar physical characteristics to carbon, oxygen, and neon ions, which are all used in heavy ion therapy. However, they demonstrate a sharper lateral penumbra with a lower radiobiological absence of certainties and lack the degradation of variations in dose distributions caused by excessive fragmenting of heavier-ion beams, especially at greater depths of penetration. In this context, the status and the prospective advancements of helium ion therapy are examined by investigating ionization, recoil, and lateral scattering values using MC TRIM algorithms in mandible plate phantoms designed from both tissue and previously studied biomaterials, providing an overview for dental cancer treatment. An average difference of 1.9% in the Bragg peak positions and 0.211 mm in lateral scattering was observed in both phantoms. Therefore, it is suggested that the 4He ion beam can be used in the treatment of mandibular tumors, and experimental research is recommended using the proposed biomaterial mandible plate phantom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Ekinci
- Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey;
| | - Koray Acici
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| | - Tunc Asuroglu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland
| | - Busra Emek Soylu
- Computer Engineering Department, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Missaglia A, Bourkadi-Idrissi A, Casamichiela F, Mazzucconi D, Carminati M, Agosteo S, Fiorini C. Prompt-gamma fall-off estimation with C-ion irradiation at clinical energies, using a knife-edge slit camera: A Monte Carlo study. Phys Med 2023; 107:102554. [PMID: 36907030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In-vivo range verification has been a hot topic in particle therapy since two decades. Many efforts have been done for proton therapy, while fewer studies were conducted considering a beam of carbon ions. In the present work, a simulation study was performed to show whether it is possible to measure the prompt-gamma fall-off inside the high neutron background typical of carbon-ion irradiation, using a knife-edge slit camera. In addition to this, we wanted to estimate the uncertainty in retrieving the particle range in the case of a pencil beam of C-ions at clinically relevant energy of 150 MeVu. METHODS For these purposes, the Monte Carlo code FLUKA was adopted for simulations and three different analytical methods were implemented to get the accuracy in the range retrieval of the simulated set-up. RESULTS The analysis of simulation data has brought to the promising and desired precision of about 4 mm in the determination of the dose profile fall-off in case of a spill irradiation, for which all the three cited methods were coherent in their predictions. CONCLUSIONS The Prompt Gamma Imaging technique should be further studied as a tool to reduce range uncertainties affecting carbon ion radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Missaglia
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria - Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio, 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Aicha Bourkadi-Idrissi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria - Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio, 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy; INFN - sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria, 16, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Casamichiela
- Dipartimento di Energia - Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini, 4, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Davide Mazzucconi
- INFN - sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria, 16, 20133, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Energia - Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini, 4, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marco Carminati
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria - Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio, 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy; INFN - sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria, 16, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stefano Agosteo
- INFN - sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria, 16, 20133, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Energia - Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini, 4, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carlo Fiorini
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria - Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio, 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy; INFN - sezione di Milano, Via Giovanni Celoria, 16, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mairani A, Mein S, Blakely E, Debus J, Durante M, Ferrari A, Fuchs H, Georg D, Grosshans DR, Guan F, Haberer T, Harrabi S, Horst F, Inaniwa T, Karger CP, Mohan R, Paganetti H, Parodi K, Sala P, Schuy C, Tessonnier T, Titt U, Weber U. Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35395649 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac65d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd) ranging from ∼4 keVμm-1to ∼40 keVμm-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LETdincreases beyond 100 keVμm-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany.,Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ferrari
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - David R Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Fada Guan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Radhe Mohan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Paola Sala
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schuy
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Titt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ulrich Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freitas H, Magalhaes Martins P, Tessonnier T, Ackermann B, Brons S, Seco J. Dataset for predicting single-spot proton ranges in proton therapy of prostate cancer. Sci Data 2021; 8:252. [PMID: 34588458 PMCID: PMC8481263 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01028-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of radiotherapy patients treated with protons has increased from less than 60,000 in 2007 to more than 220,000 in 2019. However, the considerable uncertainty in the positioning of the Bragg peak deeper in the patient raised new challenges in the proton therapy of prostate cancer (PCPT). Here, we describe and share a dataset where 43 single-spot anterior beams with defined proton energies were delivered to a prostate phantom with an inserted endorectal balloon (ERB) filled either with water only or with a silicon-water mixture. The nuclear reactions between the protons and the silicon yield a distinct prompt gamma energy line of 1.78 MeV. Such energy peak could be identified by means of prompt gamma spectroscopy (PGS) for the protons hitting the ERB with a three-sigma threshold. The application of a background-suppression technique showed an increased rejection capability for protons hitting the prostate and the ERB with water only. We describe each dataset, document the full processing chain, and provide the scripts for the statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Freitas
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paulo Magalhaes Martins
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ackermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Magalhaes Martins P, Freitas H, Tessonnier T, Ackermann B, Brons S, Seco J. Towards real-time PGS range monitoring in proton therapy of prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15331. [PMID: 34321492 PMCID: PMC8319377 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy of prostate cancer (PCPT) was linked with increased levels of gastrointestinal toxicity in its early use compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The higher radiation dose to the rectum by proton beams is mainly due to anatomical variations. Here, we demonstrate an approach to monitor rectal radiation exposure in PCPT based on prompt gamma spectroscopy (PGS). Endorectal balloons (ERBs) are used to stabilize prostate movement during radiotherapy. These ERBs are usually filled with water. However, other water solutions containing elements with higher atomic numbers, such as silicon, may enable the use of PGS to monitor the radiation exposure of the rectum. Protons hitting silicon atoms emit prompt gamma rays with a specific energy of 1.78 MeV, which can be used to monitor whether the ERB is being hit. In a binary approach, we search the silicon energy peaks for every irradiated prostate region. We demonstrate this technique for both single-spot irradiation and real treatment plans. Real-time feedback based on the ERB being hit column-wise is feasible and would allow clinicians to decide whether to adapt or continue treatment. This technique may be extended to other cancer types and organs at risk, such as the oesophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Magalhaes Martins
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Hugo Freitas
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
- Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ackermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dal Bello R, Magalhaes Martins P, Brons S, Hermann G, Kihm T, Seimetz M, Seco J. Prompt gamma spectroscopy for absolute range verification of 12C ions at synchrotron-based facilities. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:095010. [PMID: 32092707 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The physical range uncertainty limits the exploitation of the full potential of charged particle therapy. In this work, we face this issue aiming to measure the absolute Bragg peak position in the target. We investigate p, 4He, 12C and 16O beams accelerated at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. The residual range of the primary 12C ions is correlated to the energy spectrum of the prompt gamma radiation. The prompt gamma spectroscopy method was demonstrated for proton beams accelerated by cyclotrons and is developed here for the first time for heavier ions accelerated by a synchrotron. We develop a detector system that includes (i) a spectroscopic unit based on cerium(III) bromide and bismuth germanium oxide scintillating crystals, (ii) a beam trigger based on an array of scintillating fibers and (iii) a data acquisition system based on a FlashADC. We test the system in two different scenarios. In the first series of experiments, we detect and identify 19 independent spectral lines over a wide gamma energy spectrum in the presence of the four ion species for different targets, including a water target with a titanium insert. In the second series of experiments, we introduce a collimator aiming to relate the spectral information to the range of the primary particles. We perform extensive measurements for a 12C beam and demonstrate submillimetric precision for the measurement of its Bragg peak position in the experimental setup. The features of the energy and time spectra for gamma radiation induced by p, 4He and 16O are investigated upstream and downstream from the Bragg peak position. We conclude the analysis by extrapolating the required future developments, which would be needed to achieve range verification with a 2 mm accuracy during a single fraction delivery of [Formula: see text] physical dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Dal Bello
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
PIBS: Proton and ion beam spectroscopy for in vivo measurements of oxygen, carbon, and calcium concentrations in the human body. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7007. [PMID: 32332815 PMCID: PMC7181859 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63215-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton and ion beam therapy has proven to benefit tumour control with lower side-effects, mostly in paediatrics. Here we demonstrate a feasible technique for proton and ion beam spectroscopy (PIBS) capable of determining the elemental compositions of the irradiated tissues during particle therapy. This follows the developments in prompt gamma imaging for online range verification and the inheritance from prompt gamma neutron activation analysis. Samples of water solutions were prepared to emulate varying oxygen and carbon concentrations. The irradiation of those samples and other tissue surrogate inserts by protons and ion beams under clinical conditions clearly showed a logarithmic relationship between the target elemental composition and the prompt gamma production. This finding is in line with the known logarithmic dependence of the pH with the proton molar concentration. Elemental concentration changes of 1% for calcium and 2% for oxygen in adipose, brain, breast, liver, muscle and bone-related tissue surrogates were clearly identified. Real-time in vivo measurements of oxygen, carbon and calcium concentrations will be evaluated in a pre-clinical and clinical environment. This technique should have an important impact in the assessment of tumour hypoxia over the course of several treatment fractions and the tracking of calcifications in brain metastases.
Collapse
|