Nerve ultrasound can identify treatment-responsive chronic neuropathies without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination

Treatment response in patients with clinical and supportive laboratory features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy without demyelinative findings on nerve conduction studies: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Not all patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) have evidence of demyelination on nerve conduction studies (NCS). Patients with "supportive" evidence of CIDP on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), or nerve biopsy but not on NCS, often receive immunomodulating therapy. We evaluated the treatment response of patients with clinical and supportive features of CIDP lacking NCS evidence of demyelination.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted on 232 patients who met CIDP clinical criteria and were treated with disease-modifying therapy. Patients included did not have NCS criteria of demyelination, but did have supportive CSF, MRI, or US findings consistent with CIDP. A positive treatment response was defined as at least a one-point improvement in the modified Rankin scale (mRS), or a four-point increase in the Medical Research Council sum score (MRCSS).

RESULTS

Twenty patients met criteria: 17 of the 18 (94%) patients with CSF protein >45 mg/dL, 6 of the 14 (43%) with MRI lumbosacral root or plexus enhancement, and 4 of the 6 (67%) with enlarged proximal nerves on US. Eighteen patients received intravenous immunoglobulin, 10 corticosteroids, one plasma exchange, and six other immunomodulatory therapies. Twelve patients had a positive treatment response on the MRCSS or mRS. The presence of MRI lumbosacral root or plexus enhancement was associated with a positive treatment response.

DISCUSSION

A trial of immunomodulating treatment should be considered for patients with clinical features of CIDP in the absence of NCS evidence of demyelination, particularly when there is MRI lumbosacral root or plexus enhancement.

Neuromuscular Ultrasound in Polyneuropathies

Neuromuscular ultrasound is a painless, radiation-free, high-resolution imaging technique for assessing the peripheral nervous system. It can accurately depict changes in the nerves and muscles of individuals with neuromuscular conditions, and it is therefore a robust diagnostic tool for the assessment of individuals with polyneuropathies. This review will outline the typical ultrasonographic changes found in a wide variety of polyneuropathies. In general, demyelinating conditions result in greater nerve enlargement than axonal conditions, and acquired conditions result in more patchy nerve enlargement compared to diffuse nerve enlargement in hereditary conditions. This review is data-driven, but more nuanced anecdotal findings are also described. The overall goal of this paper is to provide clinicians with an accessible review of the ultrasonographic approaches and findings in a wide variety of polyneuropathies.

Neurophysiological and Ultrasound Correlations in Guillain Barré Syndrome and CIDP-Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are inflammatory polyneuropathies with an autoimmune etiology. These diseases differ mainly in the timing of their course but also in certain clinical differences. Electroneurography and electromyography are crucial for fulfilling the primary (for CIDP) and secondary (for GBS) diagnostic criteria. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is recognized as a complementary method in the diagnosis of CIDP and GBS.

AIM

The aim of this study was to present the neurophysiological and ultrasound findings of patients with clinically diagnosed inflammatory neuropathies (GBS and CIDP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We collected data from clinically confirmed patients with GBS (3 persons) and CIDP (6 persons). The neurography and high-resolution ultrasound examinations according to the UPSS scale were performed.

RESULTS

The neurography tests of GBS and CIDP patients showed mainly demyelinating lesions of the examined nerves, often with abnormal F-wave recordings. Examination using HRUS in GBS patients showed mild and regional nerve swelling with hypoechoic bundles with a predilection for proximal segments and cervical spinal nerve roots. In contrast, CIDP patients had diffused nerve swelling with hypoechoic bundles of greater severity and extent than those with GBS.

CONCLUSION

Neurophysiological tests and HRUS of peripheral nerves, plexi, and roots performed together can be very valuable, complementary diagnostic methods for the early diagnosis and effective treatment of inflammatory polyneuropathies.

Neuromuscular ultrasound in combination with nerve conduction studies helps identify inflammatory motor neuropathies from lower motor neuron syndromes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Identifying patients with inflammatory motor neuropathies (IMNs) is warranted since effective treatments are available and the prognosis of these patients differs from that of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and May 2022, 102 consecutive treatment-naïve lower motor neuron syndrome (LMNS) patients were recruited; these patients were suspected of having multifocal motor neuropathy, pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with initial lower motor neuron presentation. Neuromuscular ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were conducted at baseline. Relevant diagnostic investigations were performed if clinically warranted. The proposed US evidence of IMN was as follows: (i) nerve enlargement at ≥1 of the predetermined sites or (ii) absence of high intensity fasciculations in predefined muscle groups. Final diagnoses were made by experienced physicians after a prolonged follow-up period (≥12 months). IMN patients were defined as LMNS patients who experienced convincing improvements in response to immunotherapies. IMN patients without electrodiagnostic demyelinating features were diagnosed with treatment-responsive LMNS (TR-LMNS).

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients were classified as IMN, including nine chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/multifocal motor neuropathy patients and seven TR-LMNS patients. Six TR-LMNS patients were identified by neuromuscular US. The sensitivity and specificity of NCSs, nerve US and muscle US were 56.3% and 100%, 43.8% and 90.7% and 68.8% and 97.7%, respectively. When these three modalities were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 88.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neuromuscular US studies are supplementary modalities to NCSs, and the combined use of these techniques might improve the identification of IMNs in LMNS patients.

Typical CIDP, distal variant CIDP, and anti-MAG antibody neuropathy: An ultra-high frequency ultrasound comparison of nerve structure

To date, little is known about the usefulness of ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHF-US, 50-70 MHz) in clinical practice for the diagnosis of dysimmune neuropathies. We present a prospective study aimed at comparing UHF-US alterations of nerves and fascicles in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), distal CIDP (d-CIDP) and anti-MAG neuropathy and their relationships with clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDX) features. 28 patients were included (twelve CIDP, 6 d-CIDP and 10 anti-MAG) and ten healthy controls. Each patient underwent neurological examination, EDX and UHF-US study of median and ulnar nerves bilaterally. UHF-US was reliable in differentiating immune neuropathies from controls when using mean and/or segmental nerve and/or fascicle cross-sectional area (CSA); furthermore, fascicle ratio (fascicle/nerve CSA) was a reliable factor for differentiating d-CIDP from other types of polyneuropathies. The fascicle CSA appears to be more increased in CIDP and its variant than in anti-MAG neuropathy. UHF-US offers information beyond simple nerve CSA and allows for a better characterization of the different forms of dysimmune neuropathies.

[Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in children]

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and neuroimaging data and pathogenetic therapy of pediatric patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n=30) were observed in a separate structural unit of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital of the Russian National Research Medical University named after. N.I. Pirogova Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the period from 2006 to 2023. The examination was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society on the Management of CIDP (2021). All patients received immunotherapy, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=1), IVIG and glucocorticosteroids (GCS) (n=17, 56.7%), IVIG+GCS+plasmapheresis (n=12, 40.0%). Alternative therapy included cyclophosphamide (n=1), cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil (n=1), rituximab (n=2, 6.6%), azathioprine (n=3), mycophenolate mofetil (n=2, 6.6%).

RESULTS

In all patients, there was a significant difference between scores on the MRCss and INCAT functional scales before and after treatment. At the moment, 11/30 (36.6%) patients are in clinical remission and are not receiving pathogenetic therapy. The median duration of remission is 48 months (30-84). The longest remission (84 months) was observed in a patient with the onset of CIDP at the age of 1 year 7 months.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of CIDP is important, since the disease is potentially curable; early administration of pathogenetic therapy provides a long-term favorable prognosis.

French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system, primarily affecting the myelin sheath. The pathophysiology of CIDP is complex, involving both humoral and cellular immunity. The diagnosis of CIDP should be suspected in patients with symmetrical proximal and distal motor weakness and distal sensory symptoms of progressive onset, associated with decreased/abolished tendon reflexes. Treatments include intraveinous immunoglobulins, steroids and plasma exchange, with usually an induction phase followed by a maintenance therapy with progressive weaning. Treatment should be rapidly initiated to prevent axonal degeneration, which may compromise recovery. CIDP outcome is variable, ranging from mild distal paresthesiae to complete loss of ambulation. There have been several breakthroughs in the diagnosis and management of CIDP the past ten years, e.g. discovery of antibodies against the node of Ranvier, contribution of nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnosis, and demonstration of subcutaneous immunoglobulins efficiency. This led us to elaborate French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric CIDP patients. These recommendations include diagnosis assessment, treatment, and follow-up.

Cervical Root Enlargement in Segmental Zoster Paresis: A Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nerve Ultrasound

A 72-year-old woman presented with acute-progressive muscle weakness after a rash in the left upper limb. Muscle weakness was restricted to the left C5 innervated muscles. Short inversion time inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a high-intensity signal in the left C5 nerve root, and nerve ultrasound showed its enlargement. She was diagnosed with segmental zoster paralysis (SZP) and treated with acyclovir and methylprednisolone. Her muscle strength gradually recovered, and the abnormal signal and enlargement in the left C5 nerve root improved. This is the first SZP case of confirmed improvement of abnormal findings on MRI and nerve ultrasound in association with muscle power recovery.

Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective two-center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response.

RESULTS

We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing-remitting course predicted the therapeutic response.

DISCUSSION

It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.

Nerve ultrasound characteristics of immunoglobulin M neuropathy associated with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Immunoglobulin M neuropathy associated with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody (IgM/anti-MAG) neuropathy typically presents with chronic, distal-dominant symmetrical sensory or sensorimotor deficits. Ultrasonographic studies of IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy are limited, and were all performed on Western populations. We aimed to characterize the nerve ultrasonographic features of IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy in the Japanese population and evaluate whether they differ from the findings of the common subtypes of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively reviewed medical records and extracted the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of C5-C7 cervical nerve roots and median and ulnar nerves of 6 IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy patients, 10 typical CIDP (t-CIDP) patients, 5 multifocal CIDP (m-CIDP) patients, and 17 healthy controls (HCs).

RESULTS

Cervical nerve root CSAs were significantly larger at every examined site on both sides in IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy than in m-CIDP and HCs but were comparable to those in t-CIDP. Peripheral nerve enlargements were greatest at common entrapment sites (ie, wrist and elbow) in IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy, a pattern shared with t-CIDP but not with m-CIDP. The degree of nerve enlargement at entrapment sites compared to non-entrapment sites was significantly higher in IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy than in t-CIDP.

DISCUSSION

Our study delineated the ultrasonographic features of IgM/anti-MAG neuropathy in the Japanese population and observed similar characteristics to those of t-CIDP, with subtle differences. Further studies comparing results from various populations are required to optimize the use of nerve ultrasound worldwide.

Nerve Ultrasound Performances in Differentiating POEMS Syndrome from CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome are both acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies. We aim to explore the different features of ultrasonographic changes between CIDP and POEMS syndrome. Nerve ultrasonographic studies were performed in 120 patients with CIDP and 34 patients with POEMS syndrome. Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) were measured on the bilateral median nerve, ulnar nerve, and brachial plexus. Nerve conduction studies were performed on median and ulnar nerves to detect motor conduction blocks (CBs). CSAs at all sites were larger in patients with CIDP and POEMS syndrome than in healthy controls. Maximal CSA (median (min to max)) was 14 (6-194) mm2 for median nerve, 9 (4-92) mm2 for ulnar nerve, and 14 (7-199) mm2 for brachial plexus in CIDP and 11 (8-16) mm2 for median nerve, 8.5 (6-13) mm2 for ulnar nerve, and 14 (10-20) mm2 for brachial plexus in POEMS syndrome. The ratio of maximum/minimum CSA of the median nerve was significantly larger in CIDP (2.8 ± 2.8) than in POEMS syndrome (1.7 ± 0.3). CBs or probable CBs were detected in 60 out of 120 CIDP patients but in none of the POEMS syndromes. For distinguishing CIDP and POEMS syndrome, a two-step protocol using CB and maximum/minimum CSA of the median nerve yields a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 79%. In conclusion, compared with CIDP, nerve CSA enlargement was more homogeneous along the same nerve in individual POEMS patients, as well as among different POEMS patients. The addition of nerve ultrasound to nerve conduction studies significantly improves the differential diagnosis between the two diseases.

Contemporary challenges in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research, multiple inter-related diagnostic and management challenges remain for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed on diagnosis and treatment in CIDP. The clinical features and disease course were evaluated. Investigative techniques, including electrophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuropathology, imaging and neuroimmunology, were considered in relation to technical aspects, sensitivity, specificity, availability and cost. Available evidenced-based treatments and those with possible efficacy despite lack of evidence, were considered, as well as current methods for evaluation of treatment effects.

EXPERT OPINION

CIDP remains a clinical diagnosis, supported first and foremost by electrophysiology. Other investigative techniques have limited impact. Most patients with CIDP respond to available first-line treatments and immunosuppression may be efficacious in those who do not. Consideration of the natural history and of the high reported remission rate, of under-recognised associated disabling features, of treatment administration modalities and assessment methods, require enhanced attention.

Nerve Ultrasound Distinguishes Non-Inflammatory Axonal Polyneuropathy From Inflammatory Polyneuropathy With Secondary Axonal Damage

Introduction

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) may have a similar clinical and electrophysiological presentation to non-inflammatory axonal polyneuropathies (NIAPs) when secondary axonal damage occurs. We aimed to investigate if nerve ultrasound can help to differentiate CIDP with additional secondary axonal damage from NIAP.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves measured by ultrasound at six suitable nerve sites was compared in 95 patients with CIDP and 82 patients with NIAP. We developed the adjusted Bochum ultrasound score (aBUS) ranging from 0 to 6 resulting from the number of sites with enlarged CSA (median, ulnar, radial, and sural nerve).

Results

The mean CSA of patients with CIDP was enlarged at all six nerve sites compared with the mean CSA of patients with NIAP. A total of 21 patients with CIDP did not meet 2010 electrophysiological diagnostic criteria (European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline, EFNS/PNS criteria) for CIDP at examination timepoint but only in further follow-up, while 25 patients with NIAP fulfilled electrophysiological EFNS/PNS criteria for CIDP as “possible” or “probable” CIDP. To increase diagnostic power, we included aBUS measured by ultrasound in patients classified as “possible” or “probable” resulting in an improved specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 59%, compared to a specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria alone of 60% and sensitivity of 78%.

Conclusion

Using nerve ultrasound and the aBUS as a complementary method to distinguish CIDP from NIAP in case of secondary axonal damage can facilitate the diagnosis of CIDP.

Sonographic Multifocal Cranial Nerve Enlargement in Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory and Motor Neuropathy

Multifocal enlargements with the alteration of a normal fascicular pattern are considered to be sonographic peripheral nerve features in multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), a subtype of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We herein present the case of an 18-year-old patient with MADSAM in whom intensive sonological assessments revealed multifocal nerve enlargement within clinically affected cranial nerves. Our case demonstrated that, if systematically investigated with ultrasound, morphological changes similar to those in the peripheral nerves may be detected in a large proportion of clinically affected cranial nerves in MADSAM, boosting the future applications of cranial nerve ultrasound in CIDP.

Evaluation of the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria in a cohort of CIDP patients

Objective

To evaluate the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for CIDP in a tertiary university hospital.

Methods

In a monocentric retrospective study of 203 CIDP patients, diagnosed according to expert opinion, we evaluated the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria. Clinical course and nerve conduction studies (NCS) over 1 year from first referral were studied. Secondarily, we compared the clinical and paraclinical characteristics, including nerve ultrasound, of patients who failed with those who fulfilled the criteria in order to identify clinically relevant differences.

Results

At 1 year, 182 (89.7%) patients fulfilled the criteria (156/76.9% definite, 22/10.8% probable, and 4/2% possible). Twenty‐one (10.3%) patients did not because the electrodiagnostic criteria remained negative. These still showed signs of demyelination but did not reach the cut‐off values. They also presented typical, albeit less pronounced, multifocal nerve enlargement in ultrasonography. Mean disability at presentation and 1 year after was significantly lower. Most importantly, a relevant proportion of these patients also responded to therapy (6/21 = 28.6% vs. 82/182 = 45.3% of those fulfilling the criteria).

Interpretation

CIDP diagnosis could be established for 89.7% of patients over the course of 1 year using EFNS/PNS criteria. The remaining patients (10.3%) presented with milder disability, less accentuated demyelination, but otherwise similar characteristics and still considerable probability of treatment response. Failure to fulfill diagnostic criteria should not automatically preclude treatment. Nerve ultrasound should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool to detect signs of inflammation in CIDP.

Nerve Ultrasound Comparison Between Transthyretin Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Backgrounds: Transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP) is frequently misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) because of similar phenotypes in the two diseases. This study was intended to identify the role of nerve ultrasonography in evaluating TTR-FAP and CIDP.

Methods: Eighteen patients with TTR-FAP, 13 patients with CIDP, and 14 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled in this study. Consecutive ultrasonography scanning was performed in six pairs of nerves of bilateral limbs with 30 sites. The cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and CSA variability data of different groups were calculated and compared.

Results: Both TTR-FAP and CIDP showed larger CSAs at most sites of both upper and lower limbs than in HC groups. CIDP patients had larger CSAs than TTR-FAP patients at 8/15 of these sites, especially at U1-3, Sci2 sites (p < 0.01). However, the CSAs at above sites were not a credible index to differentiate TTR-FAP from CIDP with a low area under the curve (<0.8). The CSA variability of median nerves was significantly higher in CIDP than in TTR-FAP and HC groups, with high sensitivity (0.692) and specificity (0.833) to differentiate CIDP from TTR-FAP. The CSA variability of ulnar nerves was not significantly different between the three groups. For the TTR-FAP group, mean CSAs at each site were not correlated with different Coutinho stages, modified polyneuropathy disability, course of sensory motor peripheral neuropathy, Neuropathy Impairment Score, or Norfolk Quality of life-diabetic neuropathy score. The mean compound muscle action potential of ulnar nerves was negatively correlated with the mean CSAs of ulnar nerves.

Interpretation: TTR-FAP patients had milder nerve enlargement with less variability in CSAs of median nerves than those with CIDP, suggesting that nerve ultrasound can be a potential useful auxiliary tool to help differentiate the two neuropathies.

Nerve Ultrasound as Helpful Tool in Polyneuropathies

Background: Polyneuropathies (PNP) are a broad field of diseases affecting millions of people. While the symptoms presented are mostly similar, underlying causes are abundant. Thus, early identification of treatable causes is often difficult. Besides clinical data and basic laboratory findings, nerve conduction studies are crucial for etiological classification, yet limited. Besides Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) has become a noninvasive, fast, economic and available tool to help distinguish different types of nerve alterations in neuropathies. Methods: We aim to describe typical ultrasound findings in PNP and patterns of morphological changes in hereditary, immune-mediated, diabetic, metabolic and neurodegenerative PNP. Literature research was performed in PubMed using the terms ‘nerve ultrasound’, neuromuscular ultrasound, high-resolution nerve ultrasound, peripheral nerves, nerve enlargement, demyelinating, hereditary, polyneuropathies, hypertrophy’. Results: Plenty of studies over the past 20 years investigated the value of nerve ultrasound in different neuropathies. Next to nerve enlargement, patterns of nerve enlargement, echointensity, vascularization and elastography have been evaluated for diagnostic terms. Furthermore, different scores have been developed to distinguish different etiologies of PNP. Conclusions: Where morphological alterations of the nerves reflect underlying pathologies, early nerve ultrasound might enable a timely start of available treatment and also facilitate follow up of therapy success.

Pathophysiology of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Insights into Classification and Therapeutic Strategy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is classically defined as polyneuropathy with symmetric involvement of the proximal and distal portions of the limbs. In addition to this "typical CIDP", the currently prevailing diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) define "atypical CIDP" as encompassing the multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM), distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS), pure sensory, pure motor, and focal subtypes. Although macrophage-induced demyelination is considered pivotal to the pathogenesis of CIDP, recent studies have indicated the presence of distinctive mechanisms initiated by autoantibodies against paranodal junction proteins, such as neurofascin 155 and contactin 1. These findings led to the emergence of the concept of nodopathy or paranodopathy. Patients with these antibodies tend to show clinical features compatible with typical CIDP or DADS, particularly the latter. In contrast, classical macrophage-induced demyelination is commonly found in some patients in each major subtype, including the typical CIDP, DADS, MADSAM, and pure sensory subtypes. Differences in the distribution of lesions and the repair processes underlying demyelination by Schwann cells may determine the differences among subtypes. In particular, the preferential involvement of proximal and distal nerve segments has been suggested to occur in typical CIDP, whereas the involvement of the middle nerve segments is conspicuous in MADSAM. These findings suggest that humoral rather than cellular immunity predominates in the former because nerve roots and neuromuscular junctions lack blood-nerve barriers. Treatment for CIDP consists of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, steroids, and plasma exchange, either alone or in combination. However, patients with anti-neurofascin 155 and contactin 1 antibodies are refractory to IVIg. It has been suggested that rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to CD20, could have efficacy in these patients. Further studies are needed to validate the CIDP subtypes defined by the EFNS/PNS from the viewpoint of pathogenesis and establish therapeutic strategies based on the pathophysiologies specific to each subtype.

Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound imaging of sural nerve: A comparative study with nerve biopsy in progressive neuropathies

INTRODUCTION

Nerve ultrasound has been used increasingly in clinical practice as a complementary test for diagnostic assessment of neuropathies, but nerve biopsy remains invaluable in certain cases. The aim of this study was to compare ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHF-US) to histologic findings in progressive polyneuropathies.

METHODS

Ten patients with severe, progressive neuropathies underwent ultrasound evaluation of the sural nerve before nerve biopsy. Ultrasound data were compared with histologic results in a retrospective manner.

RESULTS

Sural nerves were easily identified on UHF-US. Nerve hyperechogenicity correlated with inflammatory infiltrates on biopsy. Nerve fascicles could be identified and measured on ultrasound in the majority of patients.

DISCUSSION

Hyperechogenicity on UHF-US may be a marker of nerve inflammation in neuropathies. Furthermore, the UHF-US probe allows for evaluation of sensory nerves in spite of their small size, providing valuable information on their size and on their internal structure.

Clinical outcomes in multifocal motor neuropathy: A combined cross-sectional and follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical course of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in a large cohort of patients and to identify predictive factors of a progressive disease course.

METHODS

Between May 2015 and February 2016, we collected clinical data from 100 patients with MMN, of whom 60 had participated in a nationwide cross-sectional cohort study in 2007. We documented clinical characteristics using standardized questionnaires and performed a standardized neurologic examination. We used multiple linear regression analysis to identify factors that correlated with worse outcome.

RESULTS

We found that age at diagnosis (45.2 vs 48.6 years, p < 0.02) was significantly increased between 2007 and 2015-2016, whereas diagnostic delay decreased by 15 months. Seven out of 10 outcome measures deteriorated over time (all p < 0.01). Patients who had a lower Medical Research Council (MRC) sumscore and absence of 1 or more reflexes at the baseline visit showed a greater functional loss at follow-up (p = 0.007 and p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that MMN is a progressive disease. Although 87% of patients received maintenance treatment, muscle strength, reflexes, vibration sense, and the Self-Evaluation Scale score significantly deteriorated over time. Lower MRC sumscore and absence of reflexes predicted a more progressive disease course.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that lower MRC sumscore and the absence of reflexes predict a more progressive disease course in patients with MMN.

Nerve ultrasound for diagnosing chronic inflammatory neuropathy: A multicenter validation study

OBJECTIVE

To validate the diagnostic accuracy of a previously described short sonographic protocol to identify chronic inflammatory neuropathy (CIN), including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Lewis Sumner syndrome, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound to detect treatment-responsive patients compared to nerve conduction studies (NCS) in a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

We included 100 consecutive patients clinically suspected of CIN in 3 centers. The study protocol consisted of neurologic examination, laboratory tests, NCS, and nerve ultrasound. We validated a short sonographic protocol (median nerve at forearm, upper arm, and C5 nerve root) and determined its diagnostic accuracy using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society criteria of CIDP/MMN (reference standard). In addition, to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound in detecting treatment-responsive patients, we used previously published diagnostic criteria based on clinical, NCS, and sonographic findings and treatment response (alternative reference standard).

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic protocol for CIN according to the reference standard were 87.4% and 67.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of this protocol according to the alternative reference standard were 84.6% and 72.8%, respectively, and of NCS 76.1% and 93.4%. With addition of nerve ultrasound, 44 diagnoses of CIN were established compared to 33 diagnoses with NCS alone.

CONCLUSIONS

A short sonographic protocol shows high diagnostic accuracy for detecting CIN. Nerve ultrasound is able to detect up to 25% more patients who respond to treatment.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This multicenter study provides Class IV evidence that nerve ultrasound improves diagnosis of CIN.

Low interrater reliability of brachial plexus MRI in chronic inflammatory neuropathies

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus shows nerve thickening in approximately half of the patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The reliability of qualitative evaluation of brachial plexus MRI has not been studied previously.

Methods

We performed an interrater study in a retrospective cohort of 19 patients with CIDP, 17 patients with MMN, and 14 controls. The objective was to assess interrater variability between radiologists by using a predefined scoring system that allowed the distinction of no, possible, or definite nerve thickening.

Results

Raters agreed in 26 of 50 (52%) brachial plexus images; κ‐coefficient was 0.30 (SE 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.14–0.46, P < .0005).

Discussion

Our results provide evidence that interrater reliability of qualitative evaluation of brachial plexus MRI is low. Objective criteria for abnormality are required to optimize the diagnostic value of MRI for inflammatory neuropathies.

See editorial on pages 679–680 in this issue.

Nerve ultrasound improves detection of treatment-responsive chronic inflammatory neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of nerve ultrasound in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of chronic inflammatory neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Lewis-Sumner syndrome, and multifocal motor neuropathy, and to determine the added value in the detection of treatment-responsive patients.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and July 2018, we included 100 consecutive incident patients with a clinical suspicion of chronic inflammatory neuropathy. All patients underwent nerve ultrasound, extensive standardized nerve conduction studies (NCS), and other relevant diagnostic investigations. We evaluated treatment response using predefined criteria. A diagnosis of chronic inflammatory neuropathy was established when NCS were abnormal (fulfilling criteria of demyelination of the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society) or when the degree of nerve enlargement detected by sonography was compatible with chronic inflammatory neuropathy and there was response to treatment.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of chronic inflammatory neuropathy was established in 38 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of nerve ultrasound and NCS were 97.4% and 69.4% and 78.9% and 93.5%, respectively. The added value of nerve ultrasound in detection of treatment-responsive chronic inflammatory neuropathy was 21.1% compared to NCS alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve ultrasound and NCS are complementary techniques with superior sensitivity in the former and specificity in the latter. Addition of nerve ultrasound significantly improves the detection of chronic inflammatory neuropathies. Therefore, it deserves a prominent place in the diagnostic workup of chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that nerve ultrasound is an accurate diagnostic tool to detect chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

Nerve ultrasound can identify treatment-responsive chronic neuropathies without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination

Introduction

We present a case series of six treatment‐naive patients with clinical phenotypes compatible with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination but with abnormal peripheral ultrasound findings who responded to treatment.

Methods

All six patients underwent a complete set of ancillary investigations, including extensive nerve conduction studies. We also performed standardized nerve ultrasound of median nerves and brachial plexus as part of a larger effort to evaluate diagnostic value of sonography.

Results

Nerve conduction studies did not show conduction block or other signs of demyelination in any of the six patients. Sonographic nerve enlargement was present in all patients and was most prominent in proximal segments of the median nerve and brachial plexus. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin resulted in objective clinical improvement.

Discussion

Our study provides evidence that nerve ultrasound represents a useful complementary diagnostic tool for the identification of treatment‐responsive inflammatory neuropathies.