A Phase II Study of Apatinib in Patients with Chemotherapy-Refractory Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESO-Shanghai 11)

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who progressed on prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): a retrospective real-world study (NCT 04984096)

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors is effective for solid tumors, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, most of these studies were focused on immunotherapy-naive patients. This retrospective real-world study offers insights into the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib with ICIs in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC patients who progressed on prior ICI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC patients who had progressed on PD-1 inhibitor. Efficacy was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), while secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Baseline characteristics and adverse events (AEs) were documented throughout the study.

RESULTS

Between July 2020 and March 2022, 29 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, with 23 (79.3%) having previously undergone resection for ESCC. Of these 29 patients, 8 (27.6%) received first-line systemic therapy, 20 (69.0%) received second-line therapy, and 1 patient (3%) received third-line therapy. At the data cutoff, the ORR was 31.0%, and the DCR was 86.2%, with 9 patients achieving partial response (PR), 16 patients with stable disease (SD) and 4 patients with disease progression (PD). The median PFS was 5.33 months (95% CI: 4.28-6.38), and the median OS was 10.37 months (95% CI: 6.26-14.46). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with anemia and lymphopenia being the most common. Only 2 patients (6.9%) experiencing grade 3-4 lymphopenia. All AEs were managed with symptomatic treatment and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and a PD-1 inhibitor demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic ESCC who progressed on prior ICI. This regimen represents a feasible and well-tolerated treatment option for this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04984096.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib plus irinotecan as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab (CAM) combined with apatinib plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment shows good efficacy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. This study aimed to explore the potential of CAM combined with apatinib plus irinotecan (IRT) as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

METHODS

A total of 59 advanced or metastatic ESCC patients receiving CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as second-line treatment were enrolled in this study between January 2020 and March 2024. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and the assessment of toxicity. Concurrently, a model was constructed utilizing patients' clinical characteristics and radiomic features to predict the patients' prognoses.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis, 58 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression (n = 9), death (n = 43), or lost to follow-up (n = 6), and 1 patient was ongoing. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% and 84.9%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 6.3 (95% CI: 4.8-7.8) and 16.7 (95% CI: 13.5-19.9) months, respectively. The most common adverse events of any grade were leukopenia (52.5%), fatigue (25.4%), anemia (23.7%), thrombocytopenia (23.7%), neutropenia (22.0%), and hypoalbuminemia (22.0%). Most of the adverse events were grade I-II. The incidence of grade III-IV adverse events was 20.3%. Predictive models were established based on the outcomes of multivariate Cox analyses. The combined model had an excellent ability to predict the 1-year OS [AUC (95% CI): 0.979 (0.930-1.000)].

CONCLUSION

CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as a second-line treatment exhibits acceptable efficacy and safety in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients. The model that combines clinical and radiomic features has the greatest ability to predict the survival of advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

Comprehensive review of signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal cancers

Targeted therapy, the milestone in the development of human medicine, originated in 2004 when the FDA approved the first targeted agent bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, and several trials have popped up in the last two decades with an unprecedented speed. Specifically, EGF/EGFR, VEGF/VEGFR, HGF/c-MET, and Claudin 18.2 therapeutic targets have been developed in recent years. Some targets previously thought to be undruggable are now being newly explored, such as the RAS site. However, the efficacy of targeted therapy is extremely variable, especially with the emergence of new drugs and the innovative use of traditional targets for other tumors in recent years. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of the major signaling pathway mechanisms and recent advances in targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers, as well as future perspectives.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CAP 02 Re-challenge): A single-arm, phase II study

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Anti-PD-L1 antibody TQB2450 combined with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor AL2846 for immunotherapy-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase 1b cohort study

BACKGROUND

Effective systemic therapy remains limited for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly after prior failed treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Theoretically, a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with ICIs may restore immunotherapy sensitivity.

METHODS

In this phase 1b study, patients received AL2846, an antiangiogenic TKI with multiple targets (c-MET, VEGFR1, c-KIT, Axl, RET, KDR, and VEGFR3), in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (TQB2450) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any cause. The primary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary end points encompassing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response.

RESULTS

Between November 2021 and September 2022, 18 patients with ESCC and 15 patients with HCC, whose ORR was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-32.8%) and 0%, respectively, were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) of any grade and treatment-related AEs were documented in 32 patients (97.0%) and 31 patients (93.9%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher AEs were observed in 10 patients (30.3%), with vomiting (6.1%) and infectious pneumonia (9.1%) being the most prevalent. Median PFS and OS values were 3.22 months (95% CI, 1.35-5.68 months) and 5.98 months (95% CI, 3.71-8.87 months), respectively, in patients with ESCC, and 5.55 months (95% CI, 2.66 months to not evaluable [NE]) and 16.72 months (95% CI, 4.86 months to NE), respectively, in patients with HCC. The DCRs were 66.7% (95% CI, 43.75%-83.72%) in patients with ESCC and 73.3% (95% CI, 48.05%-89.10%) in patients with HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined TQB2450 and AL2846 therapy exhibited a favorable safety profile in immunotherapy-refractory patients with advanced ESCC and HCC.

Paclitaxel/Ramucirumab versus Paclitaxel in 2nd-Line Therapy of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Randomized Phase II IKF-AIO-RAMOS Trial

INTRODUCTION

In squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC), therapeutical options in 2nd-line treatment are scarce with immune checkpoint inhibition being the only approved one. Ramucirumab/paclitaxel is an approved 2nd-line treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. We assessed safety and efficacy of ramucirumab/paclitaxel for ESCC.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluated paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1, 15) (investigational arm A) versus paclitaxel alone (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15) (standard arm B), both q4w, in advanced/metastatic ESCC refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months.

RESULTS

From 3/2019 to 4/2021, 21/186 planned patients were included (arm A 11 patients; arm B 10 patients) in 9 German centers. Due to slow accrual, the study was terminated prematurely. OS at 6 months was 72.7% for ramucirumab/paclitaxel and 50.0% for paclitaxel. The study design did not allow statistical comparison of the arms. PFS (3.8 vs. 3.5 months), OS (12.1 vs. 9.2 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 20.0%) and DCR (54.5% vs. 60.0%) were comparable in both arms. Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in arm A were leucopenia (54.5%), fatigue (27.3%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (18.2%). 27.3% in arm A and 50.0% in arm B had TRAEs ≥ grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab/paclitaxel shows an acceptable tolerability and numerically improved OS at 6 months. Due to the small number of patients, the current trial must be considered exploratory and more data are needed in this indication.

Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158).

RESULTS

IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P = .03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P < .001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P = .27 (consistency P = .26, heterogeneity P = .0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P = .036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P = .003, .012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.

Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common aggressive malignant tumors in the digestive system with a severe epidemiological situation and poor prognosis. The early diagnostic rate of EC is low, and most EC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multiple multimodality treatments have gradually evolved into the main treatment for advanced EC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. And the emergence of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has greatly improved the survival of EC patients. This review highlights the latest advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for EC, discusses the efficacy and safety of relevant drugs, summarizes related important clinical trials, and tries to provide references for therapeutic strategy of EC.

Esophageal cancer in China: Practice and research in the new era

China, as the one of the largest developing countries in the world and with about one-fifth of the global population, is bearing an increasing burden on health from cancer. In the area of esophageal cancer (EC), China accounts for more than 50% of the global cases, with this disease being a particularly worse for those in disadvantaged populations. Along with China's socioeconomic condition, the epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics and research of EC have developed throughout the 21st century. In the current review, existing control measures for EC in China are outlined, including the incidence, mortality, screening, clinical diagnosis, multidisciplinary treatment and research landscape. EC in China are very different from those in some other parts of the world, especially in Western countries. Core measures that could contribute to the prevention of EC and improve clinical outcomes in patients of less developed countries and beyond are recommended. International cooperation among academia, government and industry is especially warranted in global EC control.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.

Immune-based combination therapy for esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive malignancy raising a healthcare concern worldwide. Standard treatment options include surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted molecular therapy. The five-year survival rate for all stages of EC is approximately 20%, ranging from 5% to 47%, with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis after treatment. Immunotherapy has shown better efficacy and tolerance than conventional therapies for several malignancies. Immunotherapy of EC, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy, has shown clinical advantages. In particular, monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 have a satisfactory role in combination therapy and are recommended for first- or second-line treatments. Here, we present a systematic summary and analysis of immunotherapy-based combination therapies for EC.

Real-world experience with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective single-center study

The "real-world" data of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in esophageal cancer (EPC) are still an unmet medical need, including the clinical efficacy and safety. Seventy-seven EPC data were studied retrospectively; the progression-free survival (PFS), risk factors (clinical stages larger than stage II, metastatic sites larger than 2, treatment lines larger than the first line, previous surgical treatment, combined positive score [CPS] expression, etc.), and the safety were analyzed. The median PFS for all patients was 7.2 months, clinical stage > stage II; the number of treatment lines > first line was significantly correlated with prognosis (all P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that the median PFS of patients with clinical stage ≤ II was better; the results were the same for the patients with ≤2 metastatic sites, first-line PD-1 inhibitors, and not previously received radical surgery (all P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of varying degrees was 25.97% (20/77) in 20 patients and 6.49% (5/77) of grade 3/4 AEs. The highest AE was myelosuppression (15.58%), followed by liver function injury (7.79%). In addition, ≥2 lines of treatment and >2 metastatic sites predicted poor outcomes for patients with EPC who had failed first-line therapy or progressed with the combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment strategy (all P < 0.05).

Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus

OPINION STATEMENT

Esophageal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with an increasing incidence in recent decades. The majority of esophageal cancers are squamous cell carcinoma. The 5-year survival rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor, and there remains globally a pressing need for novel treatments that improve patient outcomes and quality of life. In this review, we discuss management of localized ESCC with an update on relevant newly published literature, including targeted therapy and novel biomarkers. The standard treatment approach for locally advanced, resectable ESCC is currently chemoradiation with or without surgery. Here we discuss different approaches to endoscopic resection, surgery, and radiation therapy. Although the typical chemotherapy regimen is a combination of a platinum with a fluoropyrimidine or paclitaxel, different regimens are being evaluated. With the landscape of immunotherapy rapidly evolving, at the forefront of new treatments for ESCC is immunotherapy and other targeted agents. Ultimately, the treatment approach should be individualized to each patient.

Downregulation of fibulin-4 inhibits autophagy and promotes the sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells to apatinib by activating the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway

Background

Fibulin‐4, namely, EFEMP2, is an essential matricellular protein associated with a variety of malignancies. The aim of this study was to explore the role of fibulin‐4 in the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), as well as its effect on ESCC sensitivity to apatinib treatment.

Methods

The expression of fibulin‐4 in ESCC tissues and cell lines was detected. Stably transfected ESCC cells were established by transducing lentiviral vectors for silencing or overexpressing the fibulin‐4 gene into ESCC cells, and a subcutaneous xenograft tumor model of ESCC in mice was successfully established. IHC, RT–qPCR and western blotting were used to detect the expression of related genes and proteins. The CCK8 assay, EdU cell proliferation assay, wound healing assay, transwell assay and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptosis of ESCC cells. After mice were sacrificed, the transplanted tumors were resected, and their volumes were measured.

Results

The expression of fibulin‐4 was significantly increased in both ESCC tissues and cell lines, and the high expression was closely related to the poor clinicopathological features. Downregulation of fibulin‐4 inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of ESCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Meanwhile, fibulin‐4 knockdown inhibited autophagy of tumor cells by activating the Akt–mTOR signaling pathway and significantly promoted apatinib‐induced apoptosis of ESCC cells.

Conclusion

Our study showed that fibulin‐4 is an oncogene that can promote ESCC progression and inhibit apoptosis. Downregulation of fibulin‐4 enhances the sensitivity of ESCC cells to apatinib by inhibiting cellular protective autophagy through activating the Akt–mTOR signaling pathway.

Apatinib Through Activating the RhoA/ROCK Signaling Pathway to Cause Dysfunction of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are associated with differentiated, organized, and contractile phenotype under the effect of various types of physiological conditions those are associated with migratory, proliferative, and synthetic phenotype under the effect of various types of stimuli, which dysfunction drives many cardiovascular diseases. Abnormal cell proliferation and invasion of VSMCs are among the primary causes of hypertension. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that highly selectively binds to and strongly inhibits VEGFR-2. Previous studies have confirmed that the TKIs can raise blood pressure through RhoA/ROCK pathway. LARG is a key gene in the RhoA/ROCK pathway and plays a critical role in the continuous vasoconstriction function because it regulates part of signal transduction in VSMCs. In this study, an in vitro experiment was conducted to observe that apatinib caused dysfunction of MOVAS cells through the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway and Y27632, a nonspecific ROCK inhibitor, and knockout of LARG gene can improve the proliferation, antiapoptosis, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial autophagy of apatinib-induced MOVAS cells. These findings suggest that activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway could be the underlying mechanism of apatinib-induced dysfunction of MOVAS cells, while ROCK inhibitor and knockout of LARG gene have potential therapeutic value.

Epigenetic editing and tumor-dependent immunosuppressive signaling in head and neck malignancies

Head and neck cancer (HNC) comprises a heterogeneous variety of malignant tumors, characterized by a relatively high tumor mutation burden. Previous data have revealed that immune system dysfunction appears to serve a key role in the development and progression of HNC and established immunosuppression is vital for evading the host immune response. Despite progress in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the survival rate of patients with HNC is still low. Therefore, the present review discusses the development of novel immunotherapy approaches based on the various immune cell signaling routes that trigger drug resistance and immunosuppression. Additionally, the present review discusses the epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling and non-coding RNAs that drive and support HNC progression. Furthermore, the role of cancer-associated fibroblasts, tumor macrophages and myeloid cells in tumor-related immunosuppression are considered. Specifically, the molecular immune-related mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment, which lead to decreased drug sensitivity and tumor relapse, and strategies for reversing drug resistance and targeting immunosuppressive tumor networks are discussed. Deciphering these molecular mechanisms is essential for preclinical and clinical investigations in order to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Furthermore, an improved understanding of these immune cell signaling pathways that drive immune surveillance, immune-driven inflammation and tumor-related immunosuppression is necessary for future personalized HNC-based therapeutic approaches.

Shape Designed Implanted Drug Delivery System for In Situ Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy

In this study, an intelligent drug delivery system (DDS) based on implanted triboelectric nanogenerator (iTENG) and red blood cell (RBC) is established for in situ hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy. Apatinib (APA), as an oral antitumor drug, which can inhibit the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) is loaded inside RBC, realizing the transform from oral formulation to injection preparation. Multishape designed iTENG adapted for different implant sites and environments can harvest biomechanical energy efficiently. The electric field (EF) generated by the iTENG can increase the release of APA, and the release will decrease quickly when the EF disappears, which shows that the DDS is highly controllable. The controllable DDS demonstrates an exciting killing ability of HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo with strikingly reduced APA dosage. After implantation, the self-powered DDS has a prominent therapeutic effect of HCC-bearing rabbits, which is expected to be applied in clinical medicine.

Feasibility and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy for Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Objective

This study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of anlotinib monotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) retrospectively.

Methods

This study was designed as a real-world study. A total of 83 patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC who received anlotinib monotherapy were included. Demographic characteristics of the patients, efficacy data of the treatment and adverse reactions during the treatment were documented and analyzed through the electronic medical record system in the hospital. All the patients were followed up regularly. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety profile and PFS analysis according to adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 83 patients with ESCC who received anlotinib monotherapy were included. Partial response was observed in 7 patients, stable disease was noted in 51 patients and progressive disease was found in 25 patients, which yielded an ORR of 8.4% (95% CI: 3.5–16.6%), and a DCR of 69.9% (95% CI: 58.8–79.5%). Furthermore, the median PFS of the 83 patients with advanced ESCC was 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.20–4.40) and the median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.40–10.20). Common adverse reactions among the 83 patients were hypertension (51.8%), fatigue (48.2%), weight loss (41.0%), diarrhea (34.9) and hand-foot syndrome (30.1%). Correlation analysis between hypertension status and PFS suggested that PFS of the patients with hypertension was longer than that of those with non-hypertension (median PFS: 4.5 vs 3.0 months, P = 0.019).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity for patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic ESCC. Hypertension that occurs during anlotinib administration might be used as a potential biomarker to predict PFS of patients with ESCC. The conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Rh-Endostatin Plus Irinotecan/Cisplatin as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

This open-label, phase II study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus irinotecan/cisplatin as second-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Eligible patients received 15mg/m2 Rh-endostatin as a continuous intravenous pump infusion (7 continuous days), 60mg/m2 irinotecan (days 1 and 8), and 60mg/m2 cisplatin (day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were assessable for efficacy and safety analysis. The median follow-up was 10.97 months (95%CI: 7.03-19.42) as the data cutoff. Median PFS was 4.01 months (95% CI: 3.19-5.49), and median overall survival (OS) was 12.32 months (95% CI: 8.21-17.45); 13 (26%; 95% CI: 15.87-39.55) of 50 patients had an objective response, and 31 (62%; 95% CI: 48.15-74.14) had disease control. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 12 (24.0%) patients, and no deaths were reported. The common grade 3 or greater AEs were leucopenia (18.0%) and neutropenia (16.0%). Five (10%) patients discontinued treatment because of AEs.

CONCLUSION

Rh-endostatin plus irinotecan/cisplatin showed promising anti-tumor activity in advanced ESCC patients with a good safety profile in the second-line setting, which warrants further study in this population. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03797625).

Toward Targeted Therapies in Oesophageal Cancers: An Overview

Oesophageal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Oesophageal cancer occurs as squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC). Prognosis for patients with either ESCC or EAC is poor, with less than 20% of patients surviving more than 5 years after diagnosis. A major progress has been made in the development of biomarker-driven targeted therapies against breast and lung cancers, as well as melanoma. However, precision oncology for patients with oesophageal cancer is still virtually non-existent. In this review, we outline the recent advances in oesophageal cancer profiling and clinical trials based on targeted therapies in this disease.

Esophageal cancer: emerging therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a worldwide healthcare concern and represents an aggressive malignancy. Squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC) are the two primary histological subtypes but have yet to vastly differ in management. Outcomes remain poor with current treatment approaches; however, recent progress is focused on distinguishing separate targets based on these histological subtypes.

AREAS COVERED

Here we provide an overview of EC management via a historical review and recent discoveries. As noted in this review, targeted therapy has lagged behind other solid tumors. Over the previous decade, for EACs there were only two targeted therapies used in the advanced setting with limited benefits. ESCC progress was rather non-existent. We present current ongoing advancements that have occurred in the realm of immunotherapy and emerging new agents.

EXPERT OPINION

It is becoming clearer that segregating these two histological subtypes in trials should be the goal of future trial designs. ESCC appears to be more amenable to immune modulation than EAC, however, we are navigating in exciting times as molecular interrogations of EC has expanded with the hopes of making more rapid progress. There is still hard work ahead of us to painfully define subsets representing heterogeneity and then finding appropriate agents.

Efficacy and Response Biomarkers of Apatinib in the Treatment of Malignancies in China: A Review

Apatinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor marketed in China for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has also been used off-label for the treatment of many other malignancies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of apatinib as a targeted therapy in the treatment of malignancies, we conducted systematic online and manual searches of the literature on apatinib in the treatment of malignancies. In this review, we first summarized the efficacy of apatinib against various malignancies based on clinical trials where results have been reported. In prospectively registered trials, apatinib has been proven to be effective against GC, HCC, lung cancer, breast cancer, sarcoma, esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and differentiated thyroid cancer. The response biomarkers for apatinib were also reviewed. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of apatinib in clinical studies and the design of clinical trials.

Apatinib Combined with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: We conducted a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, a tyrosine inhibitor against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty six patients were randomized into two cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) (n = 61) or combined with apatinib (Apa+TP) (n = 65), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR), safety, R0 resection rate, and operative complication rates. Results: Compared with TP chemotherapy alone, adding apatinib to neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased ORR (Apa+TP: 80.0% vs. TP: 54.1%, respectively; p = 0.004). Apa+TP achieved higher pCR rate compared with TP alone (15.4% vs. 4.92%, respectively; p = 0.101). Similar incidences of toxic effects were found between those two groups. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed. Meanwhile, apatinib-related AEs, including hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-and-foot syndrome, were mild. The R0 resection rate was 100% in both groups. No significant differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complications were observed, and no serious complications occurred. Conclusions: Adding apatinib to TP neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased ORR, suggesting an advantage of anti-angiogenesis in ESCC. Clinical Trials.gov ID: ChiCTR-TRC-1800017662.