Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Data from an Academic Central and Eastern European Center

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with High PD-L1 Expression

Before the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of up to 10%. After the positive results of KEYNOTE-024, pembrolizumab was approved in a first-line setting for patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. A small number of patients had a durable response to immunotherapy, and so far it has not been discovered who will benefit. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in a real-world setting. We enrolled 35 patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC who had PD-L1 ≥ 50%. Progression-free survival was 9 months, 95% CI (2.6-15.4). Overall survival was 14 months, 95% CI (0-28.5). Five-year OS rate for the whole group of patients was 20%, and the six-year OS rate was 17.2%. Immunotherapy was a revolution in the treatment of NSCLC. We still do not know which patients will benefit from immunotherapy, but patients who do respond may experience long-term outcomes.

Real-world treatment patterns, biomarker testing, and clinical outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the immunotherapy era

Background

Treatment for first-line (1L) metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC) changed with the introduction of immunotherapy. We describe treatment utilization and clinical outcomes in a real-world mNSCLC cohort in a 2.7-million-member state-mandated health provider.

Methods

Newly diagnosed mNSCLC patients initiating systemic anti-cancer treatment (January 2017-December 2020) were identified from the National Cancer Registry. Real-world time on treatment (rwToT) was defined as the length of time between the first and last administration date of treatment. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up (cutoff: 30 June 2021).

Results

Among 843 patients, 85% had adenocarcinoma (NSQ) and 15% had squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) histology: of these, 43% and 26% were women, median age was 67 and 69 years, and 55% and 48% had 0-1 ECOG performance status, respectively (missing: 27% and 30%, respectively). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 27.1 months (95% CI: 24.7-29.6). NSQ patients with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PDM) (N = 147) or combination (PDC) (N = 194) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC, N = 133). Median rwToT was 4.5 (95% CI: 3.5-7.6), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.6-7.6), and 2.3 (95% CI: 2.1-3.0) months, respectively; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0-1, rwToT was 9.4 (95% CI: 5.0-20.8), 7.1 (95% CI: 5.0-10.1), and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.2-4.1) months, respectively. Median rwOS from 1L was 12.5 (95% CI: 9.9-17.9), 14.8 (95% CI: 10.5-19.4), and 9.1 (95% CI: 7.1-11.5) months; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0-1, median rwOS was 25.1 [95% CI: 14.9-not reached (NR)], 17.6 (95% CI: 14.3-NR), and 11.3 (95% CI: 9.2-21.3) months, respectively. For ECOG PS 0-1 and PD-L1 ≥50% patients, median rwOS was 25.1 months (95% CI: 13.9-NR) and NR for PDM and PDC, respectively. For ECOG PS 0-1 and PD-L1 <50% patients, median rwOS was 14.3 (95% CI: 10.1-NR) and 11.2 (95% CI: 9.1-21.3) months for PDC and PBC, respectively.

Conclusion

Our real-world data support the benefit of single-agent PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high expression or PD-1 inhibitor combination for all patients diagnosed with mNSCLC with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations, initiating 1L treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as subsequent treatment in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastases

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the mainstay treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is a lack of studies assessing ICIs as subsequent treatment in older adults with NSCLC and brain metastasis (BM). This retrospective cohort study compared the real-world survival of older patients with NSCLC and BM at diagnosis [synchronous BM (SBM)] previously treated with chemotherapy receiving ICI versus chemotherapy as subsequent treatment.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC and SBM ≥65 years previously treated with chemotherapy were identified using the SEER-Medicare database (2010-2019). Patients receiving new chemotherapy and/or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ICIs as second/third-line treatment were included, excluding those ever-receiving targeted therapies. Each ICI patient was matched to one chemotherapy patient by time to subsequent treatment (within ±30 days) from diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) time was measured from the start of subsequent treatment to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare Part A/B, enrollment in Part C, or end of study (December 31, 2019), whichever came first. OS curves were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Matched cohorts included 546 patients [273 in each group; median age 71 (range, 65-87) years]. ICI patients were older, more likely non-Hispanic, with squamous cell carcinoma, and liver metastasis compared to chemotherapy. KM estimated better survival in ICI than chemotherapy {median survival: 209 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 160-275] vs. 155 days (95% CI: 135-187); log-rank P<0.001}. ICI was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death [HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.75; P<0.001] compared to subsequent chemotherapy treatment.

Conclusions

In this population-based study of older patients with NSCLC and SBM previously treated with chemotherapy, subsequent treatment with ICI was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab monotherapy survival benefits in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of real-world data

The efficacy of pembrolizumab in the treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was proved in the KEYNOTE-024 randomized trial. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify and summarize the real world evidence (RWE) of overall survival (OS) in previously untreated patients with NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE®) and EMBASE databases. Analyses were focused on survival data (median OS and survival rates at specific time points). To explore the population comparable with the KEYNOTE-024 study, we focused on studies enrolling at least 50% of patients at stage IV of cancer and ECOG performance status 0-2. A total of 41 RWE studies covering over 7600 advanced NSCLC patients naïve to systemic treatment were identified. Overall, survival outcomes reported in those studies vary considerably (median OS range: 3.0-34.6 months). Most RWE studies reported median OS shorter to that reported in KEYNOTE-024 (26.3 months), but about half of reported OS medians were in range of 95% confidence interval for OS as reported in KEYNOTE-024 trial (18.3-40.4 months). Patients with similar characteristics of stage and performance status to those of KEYNOTE-024 trial benefited the same with pembrolizumab monotherapy as their survival outcomes (18.9-22.8 months) were consistent with those reported in the clinical trial. RWE data showed substantially worse outcomes in patients with ECOG-PS 2+ compared to ECOG-PS 0-1 patients.

Immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC in real-world settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) represent the mainstay for the approval of new treatments. However, stringent inclusion criteria often cause them to depart from the daily clinical practice. Real-world (RW) evidence have a complementing role, filling the gap between the efficacy of a treatment and its effectiveness. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment scenario for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could become life-threatening events, when not timely managed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the RW impact of irAEs through the years.

Methods

The systematic review focused on irAEs occurred in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients, treated with ICIs in a RW setting. We queried two electronic databases (Embase and Medline) from 1996 to August 2022. We then conducted a meta-analysis dividing the results in two cohorts (2015-2018 and 2019-2021). We described the prevalence of patients with irAEs of any or severe grade (G). Estimates were expressed as proportions up to the second decimal point (effect size, ES). IrAEs of interest were those involving the skin, the liver, the endocrine system or the gastro-intestinal system.

Results

Overall, 21 RW studies on 5,439 patients were included in the quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The prevalence of G≥3 irAEs was slightly lower in the 2015-2018 subgroup, while the prevalence of irAEs of any grade was similar for both periods. Overall, we observed a higher ES for gastrointestinal, hepatic and lung irAEs, while a lower ES was reported for skin or endocrine irAEs. Endocrine irAEs were reported in 10 out of 21 studies, with a slight increase in the most recent studies, while cutaneous toxicities were mostly reported in two studies lead within the first time-period. Pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hepatic toxicities, showed a more heterogeneous distribution of ES over time.

Discussion

Our findings showed that the frequency of irAEs remained stable across the two calendar periods examined in our meta-analysis. This finding suggests that RW data might not be able to identify a potential learning curve in detection and management of irAEs.

Significant changes in advanced lung cancer survival during the past decade in Hungary: impact of modern immunotherapy and the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

The approval of immunotherapy (I-O) for the treatment of late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) opened new perspectives in improving survival outcomes. However, survival data have not yet been provided from the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. The aims of our study were to assess and compare survival outcomes of patients with advanced LC receiving systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) before and after the approval of immunotherapy in Hungary, and to examine the impact of pandemic on survival outcomes using data from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database.

Methods

This retrospective, longitudinal study included patients aged ≥20 years who were diagnosed with advanced stage lung cancer (LC) (ICD-10 C34) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2021 and received SACT treatment without LC-related surgery. Survival rates were evaluated by year of diagnosis, sex, age, and LC histology.

Results

In total, 35,416 patients were newly diagnosed with advanced LC and received SACT during the study period (mean age at diagnosis: 62.1-66.3 years). In patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma, 3-year survival was significantly higher among those diagnosed in 2019 vs. 2011-2012 (28.7% [95% CI: 26.4%-30.9%] vs. 14.45% [95% CI: 13.21%-15.69%], respectively). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 3-year survival rates were 22.3% (95% CI: 19.4%-25.2%) and 13.37% (95% CI: 11.8%-15.0%) in 2019 and 2011-2012, respectively, the change was statistically significant. Compared to 2011-2012, the hazard ratio of survival change for non-squamous cell carcinoma patients was 0.91, 0.82, and 0.62 in 2015-2016, 2017-2018, and 2019, respectively (p<0.001 for all cases). In the squamous cell carcinoma group, corresponding hazard ratios were 0.93, 0.87, and 0.78, respectively (p<0.001 for all cases). Survival improvements remained significant in both patient populations during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020-2021). No significant improvements were found in the survival of patients with small cell carcinoma. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line treatment in all diagnostic periods, however, the proportion of patients receiving first- or second-line immunotherapy significantly increased during the study period.

Conclusion

3-year survival rates of NSCLC almost doubled among patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma and significantly improved at squamous cell carcinoma over the past decade in Hungary. Improvements could potentially be attributable by the introduction of immunotherapy and were not offset by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Real-World Data: Applications and Relevance to Cancer Clinical Trials

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparative-effectiveness research (CER). Since the 1980s, there has been a rise in the creation and utilization of large national cancer databases to provide readily accessible "real-world data" (RWD). This review article discusses the role of RCTs in oncology, and the role of RWD from the national cancer database in CER. RCTs remain the preferred study type for CER because they minimize confounding and bias. RCTs have challenges to conduct, including extensive time and resources, but these factors do not impact the internal validity of the result. Generalizability and external validity are potential limitations of RCTs. RWD is ideal for studying cancer epidemiology, patterns of care, disparities in care delivery, quality-of-care evaluation, and applicability of RCT data in specific populations excluded from RCTs. However, retrospective databases with RWD have limitations in CER due to unmeasured confounders and are often suboptimal in identifying causal treatment effects.

Atezolizumab Monotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: An Observational Study in Ibaraki Group (ATTENTION-IBARAKI)

BACKGROUND/AIM

Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressed on cancer cells derived from various organs and antigen-presenting cells and is currently commonly used in combination with chemotherapy. We conducted a study to clarify the current status of response to atezolizumab monotherapy in clinical practice and clarify the factors that contribute to long-term response and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with atezolizumab monotherapy from April 2018 to March 2023 at 11 Hospitals.

RESULTS

The 147 patients evaluated had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.0 months and an overall survival of 7.0 months. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were observed in 13 patients (8.8%), grade 3 or higher in nine patients (6.1%), and grade 5 with pulmonary toxicity in one patient (0.7%). Favorable factors related to PFS were 'types of NSCLC other than adenocarcinoma'. Favorable factors for overall survival were 'performance status 0-1' and 'treatment lines up to 3'. There were 16 patients (10.9%) with PFS >1 year. No characteristic clinical findings were found in these 16 patients compared to the remaining 131 patients.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and immune-related adverse events of NSCLC patients associated with atezolizumab monotherapy were comparable to those of previous clinical trial results. Knowledge of characteristics of patients who are most likely to benefit from atezolizumab monotherapy is a crucial step towards implementing appropriate prescribing.

Immune checkpoint therapy for solid tumours: clinical dilemmas and future trends

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs), in addition to targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, novel targeting LAG-3 drugs have also been approved in clinical application. With the widespread use of the drug, we must deeply analyze the dilemma of the agents and seek a breakthrough in the treatment prospect. Over the past decades, these agents have demonstrated dramatic efficacy, especially in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, in the field of a broad concept of solid tumours, non-specific indications, inseparable immune response and side effects, unconfirmed progressive disease, and complex regulatory networks of immune resistance are four barriers that limit its widespread application. Fortunately, the successful clinical trials of novel ICB agents and combination therapies, the advent of the era of oncolytic virus gene editing, and the breakthrough of the technical barriers of mRNA vaccines and nano-delivery systems have made remarkable breakthroughs currently. In this review, we enumerate the mechanisms of each immune checkpoint targets, associations between ICB with tumour mutation burden, key immune regulatory or resistance signalling pathways, the specific clinical evidence of the efficacy of classical targets and new targets among different tumour types and put forward dialectical thoughts on drug safety. Finally, we discuss the importance of accurate triage of ICB based on recent advances in predictive biomarkers and diagnostic testing techniques.

Immune suppressive microenvironment in liver metastases contributes to organ-specific response of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The liver is a frequent site of metastases and liver metastases (LM) correlate with diminished immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to analyze whether tumor response to immunotherapy differs between pulmonary lesions (PL) and LM in NSCLC and to explore potential mechanisms through multiomics analysis.

METHODS

This observational longitudinal clinical cohort study included patients with NSCLC with LM receiving immunotherapy was conducted to evaluate organ-specific tumor response of PL and LM. We collected paired PL and LM tumor samples to analyze the organ-specific difference using whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and multiplex immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients with NSCLC with LM were enrolled to evaluate the organ-specific response of immunotherapy. The objective response rate (21.1% vs 32.7%) and disease control rate of LM were lower than that of PL (67.3% vs 86.5%). One-third of patients showed mixed response, among whom 88.2% (15/17) presented with LM increasing, but PL decreasing, while the others had the opposite pattern (p=0.002). In another independent cohort, 27 pairs of matched PL and LM tumor samples from the same individuals, including six simultaneously collected pairs, were included in the translational part. Genomic landscapes profiling revealed similar somatic mutations, tumor mutational burden, and neoantigen number between PL and LM. Bulk-RNA sequencing showed immune activation-related genes including CD8A, LCK, and ICOS were downregulated in LM. The antigen processing and presentation, natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity and T-cell receptor signaling pathway were enriched in PL compared with LM. Multiplex immunohistochemistry detected significantly lower fractions of CD8⁺ cells (p=0.036) and CD56^dim+ cells (p=0.016) in LM compared with PL. Single-cell RNA sequencing also characterized lower effector CD8⁺ T cells activation and NK cells cytotoxicity in LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PL, LM presents an inferior organ-specific tumor response to immunotherapy. PL and LM showed limited heterogeneity in the genomic landscape, while the LM tumor microenvironment displayed lower levels of immune activation and infiltration than PL, which might contribute to developing precise immunotherapy strategies for patients with NSCLC with LM.

Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Immunotherapy alone (mono-IT) or combined with chemotherapy (chemo-IT) has recently become the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Here, real-world outcomes of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT of advanced NSCLC treated within routine clinical practice at a single academic center in the Central Eastern European (CEE) region are presented.

Materials and methods

A total of 176 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with mono-IT (118 patients) or chemo-IT (58 patients) were included. At the participating institution, all medical data relevant for providing oncology care are collected prospectively and in a standardized manner using purposely created pro-forms. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (mOS) and median duration of treatment (mDOT).

Results

The 118 patients in the mono-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (59%), 20% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 14% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a median follow-up time (mFU) of 24.1 months, the mOS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 11.1-27.6), and the mDOT was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5). The 1-year OS was 62%. The 58 patients in the chemo-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (64%), 9% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 7% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a mFU of 15.5 months, the mOS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 15.9-26.7), and the mDOT was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.6). The 1-year OS was 75%. Adverse events of severe grade were recorded in 18% and 26% of patients, and immunotherapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 19% and 9% in the mono-IT and chemo-IT groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusion

The results from the present real-world observational study from a CEE country suggest similar effectiveness and safety of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT in patients with advanced NSCLC to those observed in randomized clinical trials. However, continuous follow-up will offer better insight into the magnitude of long-term benefits in routine clinical practice.

Overall survival and role of programmed death ligand 1 expression in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and immunotherapy: an observational study from central Switzerland

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials, therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the survival of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These trials were important for drug approval and for defining new treatment standards but the effect of checkpoint inhibitors in patients treated outside of clinical trials is not well known. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of immunotherapy on the overall survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC in the region of central Switzerland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 274 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC in central Switzerland in the years 2015 to 2018. Patients with NSCLC and actionable driver mutations were excluded. Patients with checkpoint inhibitor treatment (immuno-oncology [IO] group, n = 122) were compared with patients without checkpoint inhibitor treatment (no-IO group, n = 152). Baseline demographics, disease characteristics and therapies applied were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was median overall survival calculated either from diagnosis or from the start of checkpoint inhibitor therapy to death or data cut-off (21 July 2021). We used the Kaplan-Meier method and an adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression model. The expression of programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumour cells was used for exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Patients had a median age of 68.4 years, most were male (61.7%) and more than half were current or former smokers (65%). A test for PD-L1 expression was available for 55.8% of the tumours. Patients in the IO group were younger than patients in the no-IO group. Among the 122 patients in the IO group, the median overall survival was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-20). In the no-IO group, the median overall survival was 4 months (95% CI 3-7) with chemotherapy and 2 months (95% CI 1-2) with best supportive care. Patients with high (≥50%) PD-L1 expression and checkpoint inhibitor therapy had a slightly longer overall survival than patients with low PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that treatment with checkpoint inhibitors improves overall survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC and that PD-L1 expression could have a predictive value in patients treated outside of clinical trials. Further studies are needed to study the magnitude of the benefit of checkpoint inhibitors according to molecular NSCLC subtype.

Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Second-Line Treatment of KRAS-Mutated Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-Data from Daily Practice

Background The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) into daily practice allows for the identification of a greater number of molecular abnormalities. We aimed to confirm the benefits of immunotherapy in the group of patients with KRAS aberrations treated within clinical practice. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of the patients (pts) treated in routine practice within the National Drug Programme in Poland. The NGS was performed using a FusionPlex Comprehensive Thyroid and Lung (CTL) kit (ArcherDx) and sequenced using a MiniSeq (Illumina). The analyses were performed with the R language environment, version 4.1.3. Results A total of 96 pts with chemotherapy-pre-treated advanced NSCLC (CS III−IV) were qualified for nivolumab or atezolizumab treatment following a molecular diagnosis by the NGS and the exclusion of EGFR and ALK gene abnormalities. A mutation in the KRAS gene was found in 26 patients (27%); among them, the variant p.Gly12Cyc (G12C) was the most common (42%). The median PFS and OS for the overall population were 2 months (95% CI: 1.8−2.75) and 10 months (95% CI: 6.9−16.2), respectively. No differences were observed in terms of the mPFS between the KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type (WT) patients. A trend toward a longer OS was observed in the group of patients with the KRAS mutation, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.43). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of mutations in the KRAS gene had no prognostic significance, while the occurence of grade 3 toxicity and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3.5 were found as statistically significant factors. Conclusions Immunotherapy in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC allows for a benefit regardless of the KRAS gene mutation status. The treatment sequence, including molecularly targeted drugs such as sotorasib and adagrasib, is still discussed. The NGS is a valuable method to identify a variety of molecular abnormalities in patients with NSCLC in daily practice.

Organ-specific efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Real-World Analysis of Nivolumab and Atezolizumab Efficacy in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) have shown superior survival outcomes and improved adverse effects compared to standard chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of both treatments has not been directly compared in clinical trials. This retrospective, single-centre study was performed from June 2015 to December 2020 and included a cohort of 158 previously treated patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC who received PD-1 (nivolumab) (n = 89) or PD-L1 (atezolizumab) (n = 69) inhibitors at the Virgen del Rocío Hospital in Seville. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22.5% in the nivolumab group and 14.5% in the atezolizumab group (p = 0.140). Multivariate analysis did not show significant differences between the two groups for PFS and OS (PFS hazard ratio (HR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55−1.17, p = 0.260; OS HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52−1.21, p = 0.281). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 68 patients in the nivolumab group (76.4%) and in 34 patients in the atezolizumab group (49.3%) (p < 0.001). Atezolizumab and nivolumab did not show statistically significant differences in survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC, even when stratified by histological subtype (squamous versus nonsquamous). However, the safety analysis suggested a more favourable toxicity profile for atezolizumab.