Immunoreactivity for the beta chain of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor in malignant mesothelioma and non-neoplastic mesothelium

High tumor cell platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta expression is associated with shorter survival in malignant pleural epithelioid mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a rich stromal component containing mesenchymal fibroblasts. However, the properties and interplay of MPM tumor cells and their surrounding stromal fibroblasts are poorly characterized. Our objective was to spatially profile known mesenchymal markers in both tumor cells and associated fibroblasts and correlate their expression with patient survival. The primary study cohort consisted of 74 MPM patients, including 16 patients who survived at least 60 months. We analyzed location-specific tissue expression of seven fibroblast markers in clinical samples using multiplexed fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) and digital image analysis. Effect on survival was assessed using Cox regression analyses. The outcome measurement was all-cause mortality. Univariate analysis revealed that high expression of secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich (SPARC) and fibroblast activation protein in stromal cells was associated with shorter survival. Importantly, high expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) in tumor cells, but not in stromal cells, was associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, p < 0.001). A multivariable survival analysis adjusted for clinical parameters and stromal mfIHC markers revealed that tumor cell PDGFRB and stromal SPARC remained independently associated with survival (HR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.03 and HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00-1.11, respectively). The prognostic effect of PDGFRB was validated with an artificial intelligence-based analysis method and further externally validated in another cohort of 117 MPM patients. In external validation, high tumor cell PDGFRB expression associated with shorter survival, especially in the epithelioid subtype. Our findings suggest PDGFRB and SPARC as potential markers for risk stratification and as targets for therapy.

Overexpressed genes in malignant pleural mesothelioma: implications in clinical management

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a very aggressive cancer poorly responsive to current therapies. MPM patients have a very poor prognosis with a median survival of less than one year from the onset of symptoms. The biomarkers proposed so far do not lead to a sufficiently early diagnosis for a radical treatment of the disease. Thus, the finding of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets is needed. Gene overexpression has been frequently associated with a malignant phenotype in several cancer types; therefore the identification of overexpressed genes may lead to the detection of novel prognostic or diagnostic marker and to the development of novel therapeutic approaches, based on their inhibition. In the last years, several overexpressed genes have been identified in MPM through gene expression profiling techniques: among them it has been found a group of 51 genes that resulted overexpressed in more than one independent study, revealing their consistency among studies. This article reviews the clinical implications of confirmed overexpressed genes in MPM described so far in literature.

Inhibition of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) using gene silencing, crenolanib besylate, or imatinib mesylate hampers the malignant phenotype of mesothelioma cell lines

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a cancer of the pleural cavity resistant to chemotherapy. The identification of novel therapeutic targets is needed to improve its poor prognosis. Following a review of literature and a screening of specimens we found that platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) is over-expressed, but not somatically mutated, in MPM tissues. We aimed to ascertain whether PDGFRB is a MPM-cancer driver gene. The approaches employed included the use of gene silencing and the administration of small molecules, such as crenolanib and imatinib (PDGFR inhibitors) on MPM cell lines (IstMes2, Mero-14, Mero-25). Met5A cells were used as non-malignant mesothelial cell line. PDGFRB-silencing caused a decrease in the proliferation rate, and a reduced colony formation capacity, as well as an increase of the share of cells in sub-G₁ and in G₂ phase, and increased apoptotic rate of MPM cell lines. Loss of migration ability was also observed. Similar, or even further enhanced, results were obtained with crenolanib. Imatinib showed the least effective activity on the phenotype. In conclusion, our study highlights PDGFRB as target with a clear role in MPM tumorigenesis and provided a rationale to explore further the efficacy of crenolanib in MPM patients, with promising results.

Use of Anti-Noxa Antibody for Differential Diagnosis between Epithelioid Mesothelioma and Reactive Mesothelial Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

The histological differential diagnosis between epithelioid mesothelioma (EM) and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) is not always straightforward. The aim of the present study was to search for new immunohistochemical markers to distinguish EM from RMH.

METHODS

We evaluated and compared the expression of apoptosis-related genes in EM and RMH by real-time RT-PCR array analysis followed by clustering of significant gene expression. Immunohistochemical staining and statistical analysis of Noxa expression in 81 cases of EM and 55 cases of RMH were performed and compared with the utility of other previously reported antibodies such as Desmin, EMA, GLUT-1, IMP-3 and CD146.

RESULTS

Noxa mRNA expression levels were found to be increased in EM when compared to RMH by RT-PCR array analysis. In the immunohistochemical analysis, Noxa showed sensitivity of 69.0%, specificity of 93.6% and positive predictive value of 93.0% as a positive marker of EM in distinguishing it from RMH, and these values were almost similar to IMP-3.

CONCLUSION

Noxa is a marker with relatively high specificity, and can be used to distinguish EM from RMH. It would be a valuable addition to the current antibody panel used for the differential diagnosis of EM and RMH.

Elevated PDGFRB gene copy number gain is prognostic for improved survival outcomes in resected malignant pleural mesothelioma

PDGF/PDGFR pathway has been implicated in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) carcinogenesis, and evidence suggests autocrine mechanisms of proliferation. We sought to evaluate the incidence of PDGFRB gene copy number gain (CNG) by fluorescence in situ hybridization and PDGFR pathway protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and correlate it to patient clinical outcome. Eighty-eight archived tumor blocks from resected MPM with full clinical information were used to perform IHC biomarkers (PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, p-PDGFRβ) and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of PDGFRB gene CNG. Spearman rank correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, BLiP plots, and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze the biomarkers and correlation to clinical outcome. Several correlations between the IHC biomarkers were seen; however, none correlated to clinically relevant patient demographics or histology. In the CNG analysis, PDGFRB gene CNG in >10% of tumor cells had lower cytoplasmic p-PDGFRβ (P=.029), while PDGFRB gene CNG in >40% of tumor cells had a higher cytoplasmic PDGFRβ (P=.04). PDGFRB gene CNG status did not associate with patient demographics or tumor characteristics. PDGFR pathway IHC biomarkers did not associate with survival outcomes. However, patients with PDGFRB CNG >40% of tumor cells had improved relapse-free survival (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.09-0.72], P=.0096) and improved overall survival (HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.11-0.89], P=.029). PDGFRB CNG >40% of MPM tumor cells is a potential prognostic biomarker for surgery and may identify a unique population of mesothelioma patients. Future validation of this biomarker in prospective trials is needed. From a retrospective review of archived tissue specimens from patients with resected malignant pleural mesothelioma tumors, we show that patients with PDGFRB CNG >40% of tumor cells had improved relapse-free survival (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.09-0.72], P=.0096) and improved overall survival (HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.11-0.89], P=.029). PDGFRB CNG >40% of MPM tumor cells is a potential prognostic biomarker for surgery and may identify a unique population of mesothelioma patients.

Molecular changes in mesothelioma with an impact on prognosis and treatment

CONTEXT

In recent decades, research on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been developed to improve patients' outcomes by increasing the level of confidence in MPM diagnosis and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize data on genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in MPM that may be of interest for a better management of patients with MPM.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from scientific publications on genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in MPM by studying gene mutations, DNA methylation, and gene and microRNA expression profiling.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular changes in MPM consist in altered expression and in activation or inactivation of critical genes in oncogenesis, especially tumor suppressor genes at the INK4 and NF2 loci. Activation of membrane receptor tyrosine kinases and deregulation of signaling pathways related to differentiation, survival, proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle control, metabolism, migration, and invasion have been demonstrated. Alterations that could be targeted at a global level (methylation) have been recently reported. Experimental research has succeeded especially in abolishing proliferation and triggering apoptosis in MPM cells. So far, targeted clinical approaches focusing on receptor tyrosine kinases have had limited success. Molecular analyses of series of MPM cases have shown that defined alterations are present in MPM subsets, consistent with interindividual variations of molecular alterations, and suggesting that identification of patient subgroups will be essential to develop more specific therapies.

FISH assay development for the detection of p16/CDKN2A deletion in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Aims

To develop a fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) assay for detecting p16/CDKN2A deletion on paraffin tissue sections for use as an ancillary test to distinguish reactive from malignant mesothelial proliferations.

Method

Dual-colour FISH for p16/CDKN2A and chromosome 9 (CEP-9) was performed on 11 benign mesothelial proliferations and 54 malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) cases to establish cut-off values for p16/CDKN2A deletion. A third MYC probe was used to verify cases showing homozygous deletion. Eight equivocal biopsies were used for assay testing.

Results

Cut-off values for p16/CDKN2A deletion were calculated based on FISH signalling patterns obtained from the benign controls (mean percent nuclei plus three standard deviations). Hemizygous deletion was defined as >44% of nuclei showing the hemizygous (one p16/CDKN2A, two CEP-9 signals) or >15% of nuclei showing the monosomy (one p16/CDKN2A, one CEP-9 signal) deletion patterns. None of the benign cases showed a homozygous deletion pattern (no p16/CDKN2A, at least one CEP-9 signal). In the malignant cases, the percentage of nuclei showing homozygous deletion ranged from 1% to 87%. Therefore, the cut-off value for homozygous deletion was defined as >10%. P16/CDKN2A deletion was detected in 61% (33/54) of MPM cases. Among the equivocal biopsies, four showed homozygous and one showed hemizygous p16/CDKN2A deletion. Age over 60 years, asbestos exposure and p16/CDKN2A deletion were associated with a worse prognosis.

Conclusion

Distinction between benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations can be diagnostically challenging. FISH for p16/CDKN2A deletion is a useful test for confirming the diagnosis of MPM.

Combined inhibition of MET and EGFR suppresses proliferation of malignant mesothelioma cells

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasm associated with asbestos exposure. Although expression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including MET, have been reported in most MPM, specific RTK inhibitors showed less than the expected response in MPM cells. To determine whether the lack of response of MET inhibitors was due to cooperation with other RTKs, we determined activation status of MET and other RTKs, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of 20 MPM cell lines, and tested whether dual RTK inhibition is an effective therapeutic strategy. We detected MET upregulation and phosphorylation (thus indicating activation) in 14 (70%) and 13 (65%) cell lines, but treatment with MET-specific inhibitors showed weak or modest effect of suppression in most of the cell lines. Phospho-RTK array analysis revealed that MET was simultaneously activated with other RTKs, including EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta. Combination of MET and EGFR inhibitors triggered stronger inhibition on cell proliferation and invasion of MPM cells than that of each in vitro. These results indicated that coactivation of RTKs was essential in mesothelioma cell proliferation and/or survival, thus suggesting that simultaneous inhibition of RTKs may be a more effective strategy for the development of molecular target therapy for MPM.

Usefulness of EMA, GLUT-1, and XIAP for the cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in body cavity fluids

We compared the effectiveness of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) with 2 newly described markers, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) and an isoform of glucose transporter (GLUT-1), in the distinction between malignant mesothelioma (MM) and benign effusion (BE) in body cavity fluids. Immunohistochemical studies were performed on cell block sections from 35 cases of histologically confirmed MM and 38 BEs, using antibodies to EMA, XIAP, GLUT-1 (GLUT-1m, monoclonal; GLUT-1p, polyclonal). Results were graded based on the percentage of cells staining: negative (0%), 1+ (<25%), 2+ (25%-49%), 3+ (50%-74%), and 4+ (75%-100%). The performance of each marker was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. EMA demonstrated the best accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.91 as compared with XIAP (0.67), GLUT-1m (0.74), and GLUT-1p (0.80). Based on these findings, EMA is a better marker than XIAP or GLUT-1 for the diagnosis of MM.

Immunohistochemical detection of GLUT-1 can discriminate between reactive mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma

The separation of benign reactive mesothelium (RM) from malignant mesothelial proliferation can be a major challenge. A number of markers have been proposed, including epithelial membrane antigen, p53 protein, and P-glycoprotein. To date, however, no immunohistochemical marker that allows unequivocal discrimination of RM from malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been available. A family of glucose transporter isoforms (GLUT), of which GLUT-1 is a member, facilitate the entry of glucose into cells. GLUT-1 is largely undetectable by immunohistochemistry in normal epithelial tissues and benign tumors, but is expressed in a variety of malignancies. Thus, the expression of GLUT-1 appears to be a potential marker of malignant transformation. Recently, in fact, some studies have shown that GLUT-1 expression is useful for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression for diagnostic differentiation between RM and MPM. Immunohistochemical staining for GLUT-1 was performed in 40 cases of RM, 48 cases of MPM, and 58 cases of lung carcinoma. Immunohistochemical GLUT-1 expression was seen in 40 of 40 (100%) MPMs, and in all cases the expression was demonstrated by linear plasma membrane staining, sometimes with cytoplasmic staining in addition. GLUT-1 expression was also observed in 56 out of 58 (96.5%) lung carcinomas. On the other hand, no RM cases were positive for GLUT-1. GLUT-1 is a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker enabling differential diagnosis of RM from MPM, whereas it cannot discriminate MPM from lung carcinoma.

Expression of Cancer-Associated Molecules in Malignant Mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a malignant tumor derived from mesothelial cells, native cells of the body cavities. Exposure to asbestos is the most strongly established etiologic factor, predominantly for the most common disease form, pleural mesothelioma. The pathogenesis of MM involves the accumulation of extensive cytogenetic changes, as well as cancer-related phenotypic alterations that facilitate tumor cell survival, invasion and metastasis. This review presents current knowledge regarding the biological characteristics of this disease that are linked to the so-called hallmarks of cancer. In addition, data suggesting that the anatomic site (solid tumor vs. effusion) affects the expression of metastasis-associated and regulatory molecules in MM are presented. Finally, recent work in which high-throughput methodology has been applied to MM research is reviewed. The data obtained in the reviewed research may aid in defining new prognostic markers and therapeutic targets for this aggressive disease in the future.

Serum PDGF-AB in pleural mesothelioma

Overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) has been observed in lung and pleural tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of serum PDGF in pleural mesothelioma (PM). Four groups of subjects were studied: 93 malignant PM patients, 33 primary non small cell lung cancer patients, 51 subjects exposed to asbestos, defined as high-risk controls, and 24 healthy controls. PDGF-AB mean concentration was higher in PM patients (45.8 ng/ml) than in high-risk controls (33.1 ng/ml) and healthy controls (26.8 ng/ml). Using the cut-off level of 49.8 ng/ml, corresponding to the mean+2SD of PDGF-AB in healthy controls, 43% of PM patients showed positive PDGF-AB levels. Survival was evaluated in 82 PM patients. At the end of the follow-up (median 9.8 months) 80.5% of patients had died. Median survival was 13.1 and 7.9 months for patients with PDGF-AB lower and higher than the cut-off, respectively. Adjusting for age, sex, histology and platelet count, positive PDGF-AB levels were associated with lower survival (OR=1.2, 95%CI: 0.9-1.6), even if not significantly so. In conclusion, serum PDGF may represent a useful additional parameter to prognostic factors already available for PM.

Pathology of malignant mesothelioma

The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma relies firstly on the identification of the mesothelial nature of the neoplastic cell and secondly on the demonstration of the invasive properties of the proliferation. The latter aspect cannot be achieved by studying cellular material yet, in the right clinical setting, it is often possible to make a presumptive diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma based on exudates. Differentiation between mesothelial hyperplasia and metastatic adenocarcinoma by cytological examination alone is unreliable, so further evidence can be gathered from techniques such as histopathology, histochemistry and electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry aims to confirm the mesothelial nature of the neoplastic cells while ruling out metastatic lesions. At present there is no single reliable marker for neoplastic mesothelioma, although evidence has been presented on a large variety of gene products. In an attempt to differentiate between hyperplastic mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma, Dhaene has been able to show that over 90% of malignant mesotheliomas show telomerase activity and express telomerase subunits.

The use of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium. A novel use for desmin and comparative evaluation with epithelial membrane antigen, p53, platelet-derived growth factor-receptor, P-glycoprotein and Bcl-2

AIMS

To evaluate the expression of the intermediate filament desmin in reactive mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma and to compare its utility with five other previously reported immunomarkers claimed to be of use in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma and 40 cases of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia formed the study group. Cases were immunohistochemically stained with desmin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), p53, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) beta-chain by the avidin-biotin complex method. The cohort of malignant pleural mesotheliomas were immunoreactive to desmin, EMA and p53 in 6/60 (10%), 48/60 (80%) and 27/60 (45%), respectively. In comparison, the cohort of reactive mesothelial hyperplasias were immunoreactive to desmin, EMA and p53 in 34/40 (85%), 8/40 (20%) and 0/40 (0%), respectively. In a smaller cohort (n = 15) of malignant pleural mesotheliomas, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R beta-chain were expressed in 0/15 (0%), 2/15 (13%) and 15/15 (100%), respectively. In a small cohort (n = 15) of reactive mesothelial hyperplasias, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R beta-chain were immunoreactive in 0/15 (0%), 0/15 (0%) and 6/15 (40%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Desmin and EMA appear to be the most useful markers in distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. Desmin appears to be preferentially expressed in reactive mesothelium and EMA appears to be preferentially expressed in neoplastic mesothelium. The complementary use of both markers is advocated in ascertaining the nature of mesothelial proliferations. Immunohistochemical detection of mutated p53 oncoprotein appeared to be of less utility in this study on account of the low marker sensitivity for malignant mesothelioma. However, p53 antibody may be of use as a second-line marker of neoplastic mesothelium within a standard immunohistochemical panel of antibodies. In this study, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R beta-chain appear to be of no use in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium, although more formal evaluation of these markers is required.

Immunohistochemical analysis still has a limited role in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. A study of thirteen antibodies

To identify the most accurate and useful panel to diagnose mesothelioma, we immunostained sections from 112 mesotheliomas, 18 adenocarcinomas, and 11 reactive pleural specimens with 13 antibodies. Positive results for mesotheliomas, adenocarcinomas, and reactive pleura, respectively, were CAM5.2, 111, 18, and 11; vimentin, 30, 3, and 3; HBME-1, 75, 10, and 8; thrombomodulin, 31, 2, and 2; calretinin, 43, 6, and 11; and CD44H, 68, 10, and 4. Positive results for adenocarcinoma markers in mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas, respectively, were carcinoembryonic antigen, 1 and 15; LeuM1, 7 and 9; and Ber-EP4, 5 and 12. All reactive pleura were negative. Positive results for markers to help distinguish mesothelioma from reactive pleura in mesotheliomas, adenocarcinomas, and reactive pleura, respectively, were epithelial membrane antigen, 76, 17, and 6; p53, 78, 16, and 9; P-170 glycoprotein, 37, 4, and 2; and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta, 31, 1, and 2. The differential diagnosis of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma is based on negative markers. Individual mesothelial markers are of low sensitivity and specificity for mesothelioma. However, diagnostic accuracy is improved by the use of antibody panels. To date there are no antibodies that help distinguish mesothelioma from reactive pleura.

Primary malignant gonadal mesotheliomas and asbestos

AIMS

The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and aetiological aspects, with respect to asbestos, of seven primary gonadal mesotheliomas (three intratesticular, four ovarian) are described and compared. These tumours are extremely rare, poorly described and the knowledge of their natural history is very limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The cases were collated from the UK Health and Safety Executive Mesothelioma Register over a 24-year period (1968-91). Primary mesotheliomas of the tunica vaginalis and ovary comprised 0. 09% (10 cases) and 0.03% (three cases) of mesothelioma deaths, respectively. No primary intratesticular (non-tunica vaginalis) malignant mesotheliomas have been described. In this study, we present seven (three intratesticular, four ovarian) primary malignant gonadal mesotheliomas. In both genders the tumours show a similar age distribution (with median onset in the sixth decade), a similar association with asbestos (in approximately 50% cases), a diverse histological spectrum (with predominantly tubulopapillary epithelial subtype tumours) and an immunophenotype that is comparable with malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma. The clinical course appears variable (mean, 26 months; range, 9-50 months). All tumours in the study presented as localized masses and their prognosis appeared more favourable than that of diffuse pleural and peritoneal cases.

CONCLUSIONS

An awareness of the existence of these rare forms of malignant mesothelioma is important to prevent misdiagnosis. Immunohistochemistry has an important role in confirmation of the diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis of primary gonadal mesothelioma has potentially important medicolegal compensation considerations as a significant proportion of these cases are associated with asbestos.

Expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and PDGF receptors in human malignant mesothelioma in vitro and in vivo

The expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and PDGF receptors was studied in human normal and malignant mesothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Staining with anti-cytokeratin and ME1 antibodies and ultrastructural analysis confirmed the mesothelial nature of the cell lines used to study PDGF and PDGF receptor expression in vitro. Using antibodies, mesothelioma cell lines were found to express PDGF and both the PDGF alpha- and the PDGF beta-receptor, whereas cultured normal mesothelial cells expressed PDGF and PDGF alpha-receptor. This PDGF and PDGF receptor staining pattern largely reflects the earlier described mRNA expression in these cell lines. The only exception was the immunocytochemical detection of PDGF alpha-receptors in the mesothelioma cell lines, which is different from the inability to detect alpha-receptor transcripts on Northern blots. Expression was also investigated in mesothelial cells in vivo. Expression of PDGF was observed in malignant mesothelioma cells on frozen tissue sections. In pleural effusions, a double immunofluorescence staining procedure for PDGF and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) revealed PDGF expression by EMA-positive malignant mesothelioma cells. PDGF beta-receptors and occasionally PDGF alpha-receptors were detected in frozen tissue sections of malignant mesotheliomas, whereas mesothelioma cells in effusions showed faint expression of only the PDGF beta-receptor. In contrast, in effusions containing non-malignant mesothelial cells, only a very low level of PDGF alpha-receptor could be detected. Taken together, these results indicate that the pattern of PDGF and PDGF receptor expression in mesothelial cells in vivo largely corresponds to expression of PDGF and its receptors in vitro. Malignant mesothelioma cell lines thus constitute a good model system for studies on the role of PDGF in this malignancy. Furthermore, the data reported in this paper are consistent with the idea that an autocrine growth stimulatory effect of PDGF via PDGF receptors may play a role in the pathogenesis of malignant mesothelioma.

Proliferation in malignant mesothelioma as determined by mitosis counts and immunoreactivity for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)

In order to assess its discriminating and prognostic value, we studied immunoreactivity for proliferating nuclear cell antigen (PCNA) in human malignant mesothelioma (31 cases) and in human non-neoplastic mesothelium (33 cases with reactive mesothelium and 20 cases of normal mesothelium) using the murine monoclonal antibody PC10. We also compared it with mitosis counts expressed as the mitotic volume index (MV index). There were differences between malignant mesothelioma, reactive mesothelium, and normal mesothelium for percentage of PCNA immunoreactive cells (mean +/- SD; 27 +/- 9, 9.5 +/- 5.1, and 3.6 +/- 1.6, respectively) and for their MV index (20.3 +/- 4.5, 9.4 +/- 2.1, and 3.6 +/- 0.6, respectively). The median actuarial survival was 10.1 months for patients with less than 25 per cent PCNA immunoreactive cells, 9.4 months for patients with less than 20 mitoses per mm2 of tumoural tissue, 5.9 months for patients with more than 25 per cent PCNA immunoreactive cells, and 5.3 months for patients with more than 20 mitoses per mm2 of tumoural tissue. Our results suggest that PCNA immunoreactivity is useful in discriminating between neoplastic and non-neoplastic mesothelium and that it may have prognostic value in malignant mesothelioma.

Immunohistochemical staining of ras oncogene product in neoplastic and non-neoplastic mesothelial tissues: immunoreactivity for N-ras and lack of immunohistochemical staining for Ha-ras and K-ras

Immunohistochemical staining of 36 malignant mesotheliomas and 45 cases of non-neoplastic mesothelium including 20 specimens with signs of hyperplasia were investigated using murine monoclonal antibodies directed against p21 ras protein, Ha-ras protein, K-ras protein, and N-ras protein. All cases of non-neoplastic mesothelium and the majority of the malignant mesotheliomas (78 per cent) showed cytoplasmic and often submembranous immunoreactivity in more than 50 per cent of the cells with both the pan-ras and N-ras antibody. No immunoreactivity was observed for Ha- and K-ras. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to immunoreactivity between neoplastic and non-neoplastic mesothelium or between the various mesothelioma subtypes.