Knowledge of diagnosis, treatment history, and risk of late effects among childhood cancer survivors and parents: The impact of a survivorship clinic

Patient preferences and comfort for cancer survivorship models of care: results of an online survey

PURPOSE

Workforce shortages will impact oncologists' ability to provide both active and survivorship care. While primary care provider (PCP) or survivorship clinic transition has been emphasized, there is little evidence regarding patient comfort.

METHODS

We developed an online survey in partnership with patient advocates to assess survivors' comfort with PCP or survivorship clinic care and distributed the survey to online, cancer-specific patient communities from June to August 2020. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 975 surveys were complete. Most respondents were women (91%) and had private insurance (65%). Thirty-six cancer types were reported. Ninety-three percent had a PCP. Twenty-four percent were comfortable seeing a PCP for survivorship care. Higher odds of comfort were seen among respondents who were Black or had stage 0 cancer; female sex was associated with lower odds. Fifty-five percent were comfortable with a survivorship clinic. Higher odds of comfort were seen with lymphoma or ovarian cancer, > 15 years from diagnosis, and non-US government insurance. Lower odds were seen with melanoma, advanced stage, Medicaid insurance, and one late effect. Preference for PCP care was 87% for general health, 32% for recurrence monitoring, and 37% for late effect management.

CONCLUSIONS

One quarter of cancer survivors were comfortable with PCP-led survivorship care and about half with a survivorship clinic. Most preferred oncologist care for recurrence monitoring and late-effect management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Patient preference and comfort should be considered when developing survivorship care models. Future efforts should focus on facilitating patient-centered transitions to non-oncologist care.

Identifying contributors to disparities in patient access of online medical records: examining the role of clinician encouragement

Objective

The aim of this study was to understand the influence of clinician encouragement and sociodemographic factors on whether patients access online electronic medical records (EMR).

Materials and Methods

We analyzed 3279 responses from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 cycle 4 survey, a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey administered by the National Cancer Institute. Frequencies and weighted proportions were calculated to compare clinical encouragement and access to their online EMR. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified factors associated with online EMR use and clinician encouragement.

Results

In 2020, an estimated 42% of US adults accessed their online EMR and 51% were encouraged by clinicians to access their online EMR. In multivariate regression, respondents who accessed EMR were more likely to have received clinician encouragement (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-14.0), college education or higher (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7), history of cancer (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.3), and history of chronic disease (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-3.2). Male and Hispanic respondents were less likely to have accessed EMR than female and non-Hispanic White respondents (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8, and OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8, respectively). Respondents receiving encouragement from clinicians were more likely to be female (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3), have college education (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), history of cancer (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), and greater income levels (OR, 1.8-3.6).

Discussion

Clinician encouragement of patient EMR use is strongly associated with patients accessing EMR, and there are disparities in who receives clinician encouragement related to education, income, sex, and ethnicity.

Conclusions

Clinicians have an important role to ensure that all patients benefit from online EMR use.

Family perspectives on the transition from active treatment to survivorship for children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Completing therapy for childhood cancer is an exciting milestone. However, this adjustment can be extremely stressful for patients and their families as they transition from cancer patient to survivor. A better understanding of the patient and family experience and their needs during this transition is crucial for developing guidelines and leveraging support for future patients and families.

PROCEDURE

Participants were recruited from across the United States using a maximum variation sampling strategy. Families were eligible if they had a child diagnosed with cancer before age 15 and had completed treatment at least 1 year prior to their interview. Participants completed a 90-180-minute semi-structured interview either in person or virtually. Interviews focused on the experiences of getting a diagnosis, experiences with treatment, information seeking, impact of cancer on the family, social support, and transitions to survivorship. Inductive thematic analysis revealed a wide variety of themes. This paper examines the transition from active cancer therapy into survivorship.

RESULTS

Identified primary themes included (i) feelings about transitioning off therapy; (ii) coping with lingering effects; and (iii) experiences of transitioning off therapy and survivorship care. Subthemes highlighted the need for more support for both patients and families during this transition.

CONCLUSION

Patients and families desire more support during the transition off therapy. Suggestions included access to additional resources, earlier transition to receiving survivorship care, and more holistic survivorship care. Further research is needed to determine best models and feasibility of delivering this desired support to all patients and families.

Examining the Role of Post-Treatment Family Support in Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Families play a critical role in the health and well-being of adolescent and young adult (AYA)-aged survivors (13-39 years) of pediatric and AYA cancers during cancer treatment. However, little is known about the roles that families play post-treatment. It is important to expand an understanding on the roles of family support on post-treatment psychosocial health outcomes. This review aims to synthesize the current literature on family support on post-treatment psychosocial health outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search utilizing PubMed returned n = 15 peer-reviewed journal articles investigating parent and family psychosocial support roles post-treatment. Results: Parental support, family functioning, parental knowledge, and education in survivorship care are critical factors in lowering psychological and emotional distress, increasing identification of long-term risks associated with cancer treatment, and increasing autonomy and psychological growth and development. Conclusion: Results suggest that health care professionals should consider integrating factors such as assessment of family functioning and increasing parent education in post-treatment clinical assessments. Integrating family support when assessing a survivor's post-treatment supportive care needs may strengthen psychosocial survivorship care.

Survivorship, Quality of Life, and Transition to Adult Care for Pediatric and Adolescent Thyroid Cancer Survivors

The importance of long-term survivorship care to reduce survivor and family anxiety and burden, decrease emergency visits and health care costs, improve knowledge, as well as implement timely surveillance is widely accepted. Most childhood cancer survivors suffer from an increased number of medical and psychosocial comorbidities as they age and are at a higher risk for early mortality, which differs by cancer diagnosis. Childhood thyroid cancer survivors fall within this spectrum. Some have significant complications and/or late effects from treatment, whereas others have no long-term medical late effects, but almost all will require life-long thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Therefore, providing survivorship and transitional care, including a survivorship and/or transitional care plan (SCP/TCP), as well as periodically assessing the needs and quality of life for the patient and their family, should be implemented for our young thyroid cancer survivors.

Cancer knowledge and health-consciousness in childhood cancer survivors following transition into adult care—results from the ACCS project

Background

Knowledge on chronic medical conditions in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) is constantly growing and underlines that long-term follow-up (LTFU) care is often mandatory, also in adulthood. However, many CCSs discontinue follow-up care after transition to adult care. One reason might be that the current transition practices do not meet the needs of adolescent and young adult CCSs. We therefore aim to evaluate different transition models for Swiss CCSs by assessing their cancer knowledge, cancer worries, self-management skills, and expectations for LTFU care, following transition in two different hospital-based models.

Methods

Within the Aftercare of Childhood Cancer Survivors (ACCS) study, we performed a questionnaire-based survey with a cross-sectional and longitudinal part. We included 5-year CCSs aged >16 years at recruitment who were transitioned to adult care in two hospitals between 2014 and 2021. Here, we report the results of the cross-sectional part. We compared the survivors’ cancer knowledge with medical record data and assessed cancer worries (6 questions), self-management skills (15 questions), and expectations (12 questions) by validated scales. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, and t-tests to describe the results.

Results

We analyzed 57 CCSs (response rate 44%), 60% of those were female, had a median age of 9 years at diagnosis and 23 years at the questionnaire. Most CCSs recalled their diagnosis (95%) and exposure to treatment modalities (98%) correctly. CCSs worried the most about potential late effects (47%) and issues with having children in the future (44%). At least 75% of CCSs agreed to 12 of the 15 self-management questions, indicating high self-management skills. The top three expectations included that physicians know the survivors’ cancer history, that visits start on time, and that physicians can always be called in case of questions.

Conclusion

CCSs receiving hospital-based LTFU care have good cancer knowledge and high self-management skills. The identified worries and expectations will help to improve the LTFU care of CCSs who transition to adult care, to further inform and educate survivors and healthcare professionals about and might be relevant for other countries with a similar healthcare system.

Early parental knowledge of late effect risks in children with cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Despite the pervasiveness of late effects in childhood cancer survivors, many parents feel inadequately informed about their child's risks. We assessed early parental knowledge of risks of late effects and predictors of increased knowledge.

DESIGN/METHODS

Parents of children receiving cancer treatment at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center were surveyed about their knowledge of their child's likelihood of eight late effects. Individual risk for each late effect (yes/no) was assessed using the Children's Oncology Group's Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines v5 as a reference. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize knowledge scores; ordinal logistic regression was used to identify predictors of higher knowledge.

RESULTS

Of 96 parent participants, 11 (11.46%) correctly identified all of their child's risks for the eight late effects. Five of eight was the median number of correctly identified late effect risks. Among 21 parents whose children were at risk for ototoxicity, 95% correctly identified this risk. Conversely, parents of at-risk children were less knowledgeable about risks of secondary malignancy (63% correct identification, of N = 94 at risk), cardiac toxicity (61%; N = 71), neurocognitive impairment (56%; N = 63), and infertility (28%; N = 61). Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified no significant differences in parental knowledge of late effect risks by any factors evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Gaps in parental knowledge of potential late effects of childhood cancer treatment emerge early in a child's care, and parents are more knowledgeable about some late effects, such as ototoxicity, than others, such as infertility. As no child- or parent-specific factors were associated with increased knowledge of late effect risks, interventions must be applied broadly.

The untold story of late effects: a qualitative analysis of breast cancer survivors' emotional responses to late effects

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, called late effects, years after the completion of active treatment. Late effects can significantly impair physical functioning. The current study aimed to explore breast cancer survivors' experiences of late effects, their emotional responses to existing or potential late effects and their perceived impact.

METHODS

A total of 36 women treated for breast cancer in the last 10 years participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participant views were sought with respect to knowledge, experience, and perceived longer-term risk. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management. There was a range of emotional responses to late effects; however, many participants reported being unaware of their risk of late effects. Participants conceptualised late effects as any long-term effect of treatment regardless of the time of onset. Women reported living with constant uncertainty and feared cancer recurrence. Many were focused on managing long-term treatment side effects, rather than late effects.

CONCLUSION

Many women undergo treatment and remain unaware of associated late effect risks. National guidelines recommend patients be informed about late effects; however, the results of this study suggest a gap between policy and practice. Evidence-based interventions are needed to equip women with strategies to physically and emotionally manage late effects.

Thinking ahead: Parents' worries about late effects of childhood cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Many childhood cancersurvivors experience at least one late effect of treatment, and both late effects and persistent cancer-related worry can negatively impact quality of life in survivorship. Little is known about the prevalence or impact of parental worry about late effects early in treatment. This study evaluated parental perceived likelihood, impact, and worry about late effects of childhood cancer.

PROCEDURE

We surveyed 96 parents of pediatric cancer patients at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center within a year of diagnosis. Parents were asked about their experiences with late effects communication, general worry about late effects, and specific late effect worries.

RESULTS

Most (96%) parents valued information about late effects, and 93% considered late effects in their treatment decision-making. Yet, 24% could not recall receiving any information about late effects, and only 51% felt well prepared for potential late effects. Though only 20% of parents considered their child at high risk of experiencing late effects, 61% were extremely/very worried about late effects. Those who felt their child was at high risk of experiencing late effects were more likely to worry (OR = 4.7, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Many parents feel inadequately informed about late effects of cancer treatment, and only one-fifth of parents consider late effects to be likely for their child. However, a majority of parents worry about late effects, including ones they think their child is unlikely to experience. Although some worry is anticipated, disproportionate worry may be mitigated by addressing both educational shortfalls and emotional concerns.

Long-term Follow-up Care for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Progress in therapy has made survival into adulthood a reality for most children, adolescents, and young adults with a cancer diagnosis today. Notably, this growing population remains vulnerable to a variety of long-term therapy-related sequelae. Systematic ongoing follow-up of these patients is, therefore, important to provide for early detection of and intervention for potentially serious late-onset complications. In addition, health counseling and promotion of healthy lifestyles are important aspects of long-term follow-up care to promote risk reduction for physical and emotional health problems that commonly present during adulthood. Both general and subspecialty health care providers are playing an increasingly important role in the ongoing care of childhood cancer survivors, beyond the routine preventive care, health supervision, and anticipatory guidance provided to all patients. This report is based on the guidelines that have been developed by the Children's Oncology Group to facilitate comprehensive long-term follow-up of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (www.survivorshipguidelines.org).

Emerging and Ongoing Survivorship Challenges Among Childhood Cancer Survivors and Providing Risk-Based Focused Follow-Up Care

OBJECTIVES

To provide a summary of the emerging and ongoing survivorship challenges facing childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors and their families.

DATA SOURCES

Research and review articles, websites, and clinical guidelines specific to childhood cancer survivorship were used.

CONCLUSION

Many challenges exist in assuring quality long-term follow-up and risk-based screening for childhood cancer survivors. Although many childhood cancer survivors survive well into adulthood, they are at risk for a vast number of later complications of their cancer treatment necessitating annual cancer surveillance. In addition, many childhood cancer survivors are not engaging in long-term follow-up recommendations for clinic attendance, risk-based surveillance, and screening for potentially life-ending events. Pediatric oncology nurses and advanced practice nurses have played an enormous role in the design of childhood cancer survivorship programs and are an integral member of the multidisciplinary health care team who care for this population. Nurses have an obligation to continue to advance the survivorship care of childhood cancer survivors and lead interventional opportunities to improve the lifelong health-related quality of life and overall physical health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Pediatric oncology nurses and advanced practice registered nurses must have a working knowledge of the many late effects that childhood cancer treatment has on the long-term health of childhood cancer survivors. Nurses are well-placed in positions to continue the efforts begun more than 2 decades prior by pediatric oncology nurses who saw the value and necessity of designated survivorship programs.

Unmet rehabilitation needs in 86% of Norwegian paediatric embryonal brain tumour survivors

AIM

To study incidence, types and degrees of late effects in a geographical cohort of paediatric medulloblastoma and central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumour (CNS-PNET) survivors, and identify the need for rehabilitation.

METHODS

Between 1974 and 2013, 63 patients survived treatment for paediatric medulloblastoma and CNS-PNET at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Of these, 50 accepted invitation and were included in this study.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 20 years (range 3.2-41), and 96% of participants had developed late effects. Cognitive impairment was found in 72%, reduced hearing in 68%, endocrine deficits in 66%, epilepsy in 32% and another 30% had been diagnosed with one or more second primary neoplasms. Radiotherapy significantly increased risk of secondary primary neoplasms and endocrinological deficits, chemotherapy risk of ototoxicity and endocrinological deficits, and epilepsy was found significantly more often in CNS-PNET than medulloblastoma patients. Epilepsy was the main cause of cognitive impairments (full-scale IQ) in our study. 86% of participants had an unmet rehabilitation need.

CONCLUSION

Significant late effects and unmet rehabilitation needs were documented in the large majority of survivors after treatment for paediatric medulloblastoma and CNS-PNET.

Re-Engage: A Novel Nurse-Led Program for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Who Are Disengaged From Cancer-Related Care

Background:Survivors of childhood cancer often experience treatment-related chronic health conditions. Survivorship care improves survivors’ physical and mental health, yet many are disengaged from care. Innovative models of care are necessary to overcome patient-reported barriers to accessing survivorship care and to maximize survivors’ health.Methods:We piloted a novel survivorship program, called “Re-engage,” a distance-delivered, nurse-led intervention aiming to engage, educate, and empower survivors not receiving any cancer-related care. Re-engage involves a nurse-led consultation delivered via telephone/online to establish survivors’ medical history and needs. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, 1 month postintervention, and 6-month follow-up.Results:A total of 27 survivors who had not accessed survivorship care in the last 2 years participated (median age, 31 years; interquartile range [IQR], 27–39 years); of which, 82% were at high-risk for treatment-related complications. Participation in Re-engage was high (75%) and there was no attrition once survivors enrolled. At 1 month postintervention, 92% of survivors reported that Re-engage was “beneficial,” which all survivors reported at 6-month follow-up. Survivors’ overall satisfaction with their care increased from 52% before Re-engage to 84% at 1 month postintervention. Survivors’ mean self-efficacy scores remained similar from baseline to 1 month postintervention (b = −0.33, 95% CI, −1.31 to 0.65), but increased significantly from baseline to 6-month follow-up (b = 1.64, 95% CI, 0.28–3.00). At 6-month follow-up, 73% of survivors showed an increase in health-related self-efficacy compared with baseline.Conclusions:Re-engage is a highly acceptable and feasible intervention and promotes health-related self-efficacy, which is integral to survivors being advocates for their own health. Further empirical work is needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of Re-engage.

Trial registration:ACTRN12618000194268

Parental Considerations Regarding Cure and Late Effects for Children With Cancer

BACKGROUND

More than 80% of children with cancer become long-term survivors, yet most survivors experience late effects of treatment. Little is known about how parents and physicians consider late-effects risks against a potential survival benefit when making treatment decisions.

METHODS

We used a discrete choice experiment to assess the importance of late effects on treatment decision-making and acceptable trade-offs between late-effects risks and survival benefit. We surveyed 95 parents of children with cancer and 41 physicians at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center to assess preferences for 5 late effects of treatment: neurocognitive impairment, infertility, cardiac toxicity, second malignancies, and impaired growth and development.

RESULTS

Each late effect had a statistically significant association with treatment choice, as did survival benefit (P < .001). Avoidance of severe cognitive impairment was the most important treatment consideration to parents and physicians. Parents also valued cure and decreased risk of second malignancies; physician decision-making was driven by avoidance of second malignancies and infertility. Both parents and physicians accepted a high risk of infertility (parents, a 137% increased risk; physicians, an 80% increased risk) in exchange for a 10% greater chance of cure.

CONCLUSIONS

Avoidance of severe neurocognitive impairment was the predominant driver of parent and physician treatment preferences, even over an increased chance of cure. This highlights the importance of exploring parental late-effects priorities when discussing treatment options.

A study of childhood cancer survivors' engagement with long-term follow-up care: 'To attend or not to attend, that is the question'

PURPOSE

In the UK, there are over 40,000 childhood cancer survivors (CCS); this figure grows approximately 1300 annually. Two-thirds are at risk of developing serious disabling or life-threatening conditions due to adverse late effects of the cancer or treatment received in childhood. Life-long, follow-up care for the surveillance and management of late effects is recommended. This study explored CCS' views and experiences of long-term follow-up (LTFU) care within a cancer centre.

METHODS

Paper questionnaires (n = 113) and qualitative interviews (n = 13).

RESULTS

The majority (n = 83, 80%) of CCS reported being satisfied with their LTFU care and felt that it was important to attend long-term survivorship follow-up (n = 97, 86%). However, some were not well informed about their cancer treatment history, purpose for attending the clinic or the potential for late effects. Barriers associated with LTFU included; provision of information, lack of interpersonal relationships, practical and logistic challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers identified can be addressed through strategies including provision of verbal and written information and care plans to increase CCS' knowledge of their cancer history, risk of late effects and the purpose of LTFU care, both at transition and throughout their survivorship journey; patient-centred services that enhance patient choice and flexibility of access to multiple specialities; and use of risk stratified pathways to encourage supported self-management based on cancer type, co-morbidity, and level of professional involvement required. Improving regular provision of information at critical time-points, and exploring a flexible, patient-centred delivery of LFTU care based on risk, could increase attendance and self-management in CCS.

Using Quality Improvement Methodology to Implement Survivorship Care Plans

PURPOSE:

Accreditation requirements for cancer centers by the American College of Surgeons’ Commission on Cancer have included provision of survivorship care plans (SCPs) to patients treated with curative intent soon after completion of therapy. These were traditionally provided in a dedicated survivorship clinic for our pediatric oncology patients later in the survivorship time period. Our goal was to increase timely provision of SCPs to eligible patients in our acute care pediatric oncology clinic and to have this serve as a bridge to longer-term survivorship care.

METHODS:

Our pediatric oncology clinic used quality improvement methodology to implement a process for creation of SCPs. We defined eligible patients on the basis of curative intent. Cancer registry data were queried to find eligible patients, and chart reviews were done weekly. A P chart and run chart were used to monitor our process for creation of plans and overall completion rate, respectively.

RESULTS:

During the intervention period, we increased the percentage of eligible patients with an SCP from 28% on June 30, 2017, to 53% by December 31, 2017. Since that time, we have continued to increase the percentage of patients with SCPs, reaching 69% by June 30, 2019.

CONCLUSION:

By using quality improvement methodology, our pediatric oncology clinic was able to change its clinical practice and implement a sustainable process for provision of SCPs and survivorship planning earlier in the post-treatment course, and meet the Commission on Cancer accreditation standard.

Survivors' knowledge of their diagnosis, treatment and possible late adverse effects after autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma

Purpose: Lymphoma survivors after high dose therapy with autologous stem cell therapy (HD-ASCT) are at high risk for late adverse effects (AEs). Information patients receive and collect throughout their cancer trajectory about diagnosis, treatment schedule and risks of AEs may influence attitudes and health-related behavior in the years after treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore level of knowledge in lymphoma survivors after HD-ASCT at a median of 12 years after primary diagnosis. Material and methods: From a national study on the effects of HD-ASCT for lymphomas, 269 survivors met for an outpatient examination, including a structured interview addressing knowledge about diagnosis and treatment. Survivors were also asked whether they knew and/or had experienced certain common late AEs. Numbers of recognized and experienced late AEs were presented as sum scores. Factors associated with the level of knowledge of late AEs were analyzed by linear regression analysis. Results: Eighty-one percent of the survivors knew their diagnosis, 99% knew the components of HD-ASCT and 97% correctly recalled having had radiotherapy. Ninety percent reported awareness of late AEs, but the level of knowledge and personal experience with specified AEs varied. Thirty-five percent of survivors stated to have received follow-up for late AEs. In multivariable analysis younger age at diagnosis, having received mediastinal radiotherapy, higher mental health related quality of life, a higher number of self-experienced late AEs and having received follow-up care for late AEs were significantly associated with a higher level of knowledge of AEs. Conclusion: The majority of lymphoma survivors treated with HD-ASCT correctly recalled diagnosis and treatment, while knowledge of late AEs varied. Our findings point to information deficits in survivors at older age and with lower mental health related quality of life. They indicate benefit of follow-up to enhance education on late AEs in lymphoma survivors.

Bridging the Gap: A Pilot Program to Understand and Meet the Needs of Pediatric Patients and Families as They Transition Off Cancer-Directed Therapy

Background: With improved curative therapies, over 80% of children and adolescent/young adults diagnosed with cancer are expected to live into adulthood. This population is at risk for increased morbidity and early mortality and requires ongoing health care and surveillance for late effects of treatment. This pilot study assessed the acceptability of a structured medical visit at the completion of cancer-directed therapy as well as patient/family's knowledge of diagnosis and other aspects of care. Method: Patients/families who were 0 to 6 months from completion of cancer-directed therapy attended a one-time transition visit during which they completed a series of questionnaires assessing knowledge about diagnosis, treatment, potential late effects, and duration of ongoing care. They were then given treatment summaries, a plan for follow-up care, information about care after treatment as well as late effects. They completed a questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with this visit. Results: The majority of patients/families knew their diagnosis and treatment modalities. Less knew that their treatment put them at risk for cardiac toxicity or problems with future fertility. A significant number thought follow-up care would continue for only 5 years. Overall participants were satisfied with the visit. Conclusion: The transition period from on to off therapy may be a critical time point to provide patients with cancer and their families with information regarding treatment, follow-up care and testing, and potential late effects. Future studies should assess if this intervention improves compliance with recommended care and surveillance, and improved outcomes.

A brief survey of health habits among childhood cancer survivors

Using a survey, we assessed four health habits in 468 pediatric cancer survivors. Approximately 75% were at goal for ≥1 behavior-44% were active ≥1 hr per day, 40% engaged in ≤1 hr of screen time a day, 34% consumed sweetened beverages not often, and 4% ate >4 servings of fruits and vegetables per day. Survivors' age was associated with being active (P < 0.001) and limited screen time (P = 0.001). Males were more likely to be active (P = 0.003). The most common combination of goal behaviors was activity and screen time. Encouraging healthy behaviors may decrease the burden of late effects in survivors.

Assessment of end-of-treatment transition needs for pediatric cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and their families

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The transition off active treatment is a time of significant stress for pediatric cancer patients and families. Providing information and support at this time is among the new psychosocial standards of care in pediatric oncology. This study sought to explore patient and family needs and concerns at the end of their active cancer treatment.

DESIGN/METHODS

Forty-nine caregiver-child dyads completed semi-structured interviews and surveys 1-2 months before ending treatment, and again 3-7 months after treatment concluded.

RESULTS

Patients and caregivers reported a moderate level of understanding of follow-up care needs, late effects, and perceived preparation. Altogether, child, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients and parents identified similar priorities for information needed during the transition off active treatment. The most essential pieces of information desired by patients and families across time points included reviews of late effects, schedules for follow-up care, health and physical restrictions, communication with the patient's primary care provider, and provision of a treatment summary. At Time 2, patients and families reported a greater retrospective desire for emotional health resources. Most patients and caregivers wanted information from a variety of sources, but the desired timing to receive this information varied and was dependent on disease group.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many essential components to end-of-treatment care that are not consistently provided to pediatric cancer patients and families. Formalized programs offering education and support should be provided by multidisciplinary teams prior to the end of active treatment.

Parent understanding of the risk of future limitations secondary to pediatric cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Parents and physicians may have different understandings of a child's risk of future limitations due to cancer or cancer treatment. We evaluated alignment between parent- and physician-estimated risk of late effects.

METHODS

We surveyed 352 parents of children with cancer within 12 weeks of diagnosis, and the children's oncologists, at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. We assessed parent and physician estimations of the child's risk of future limitations in physical abilities, intelligence, or quality of life (QOL) due to cancer treatment. Physician-estimated risk of limitations ≥50% was considered high risk.

RESULTS

Physicians considered 22% of children at high risk of physical impairments, 9% at high risk for impaired intelligence, and 6% at high risk for impaired QOL. Among high-risk children, 38% of parents recognized this risk in physical abilities, 21% in intelligence, and 5% in QOL. In multivariable analysis, parental understanding of risk, defined as concordant parent and physician estimates, was greater among parents of children at lower risk of future limitations (odds ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 1.35-4.96). Regardless of risk, 92% of parents considered it very/extremely important to receive information about potential health implications of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most parents want information about life after cancer, most parents of children at high risk of future impairment do not recognize this risk. Strategies to improve communication about late effects throughout pediatric cancer treatment should prioritize meeting information needs and improving parent understanding of the risk of impairment.

Models of Care for Survivors of Childhood Cancer From Across the Globe: Advancing Survivorship Care in the Next Decade

With improvements in cancer treatment and supportive care, a growing population of survivors of childhood cancer at risk for significant and potentially life-threatening late effects has been identified. To provide a current snapshot of the models of care from countries with varying levels of resources and health care systems, stakeholders in childhood cancer survivorship clinical care and research were identified from 18 countries across five continents. Stakeholders responded to a survey and provided a brief narrative regarding the current state of survivorship care. Findings indicate that among pediatric-age survivors of childhood cancer (allowing for differences in age cutoffs across countries), resources are generally available, and a large proportion of survivors are seen by a physician familiar with late effects in most countries. After survivors transition to adulthood, only a minority are seen by a physician familiar with late effects. Despite the need to improve communication between pediatric oncology and primary care, only a few countries have existing national efforts to educate primary care physicians, although many more reported that educational programs are in development. These data highlight common challenges and potential solutions for the lifelong care of survivors of childhood cancer. Combining risk-based and patient-oriented solutions for this population is likely to benefit both providers and patients.

Parent perspectives on information about late effects of childhood cancer treatment and their role in initial treatment decision making

BACKGROUND

Though most childhood cancer survivors experience late effects of treatment, we know little about parent preferences for late effects information during therapy, or how parents weigh late effects when making treatment decisions. Our objective was to explore how parents of children with cancer consider late effects in initial treatment decision making and during active cancer treatment.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 parents of children with cancer who were actively receiving treatment at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten of 12 parents reported that they had to decide between two or more treatment options for their child's cancer. Of those, 50% (5/10) considered late effects to be an important factor in their decision making. Most parents wanted early and detailed information about their child's risk of late effects to make treatment decisions and to feel prepared for the future. However, a few parents felt too overwhelmed to focus on late effects at diagnosis. While many recalled extensive late effects information in informed consent discussions, some parents felt these issues were minimally addressed.

CONCLUSION

Parents desire detailed information about late effects to make informed treatment decisions and prepare for the future. Despite the role of late effects in treatment decision making, some parents feel that late effects are either inadequately addressed or too overwhelming to process at diagnosis. Parents may benefit from early assessment of their information needs and a return to these issues over time.

Perceptions of risk of infertility among male survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to characterize and identify factors associated with perceptions of risk of infertility among adult male survivors of childhood cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1233 adult male survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who were without a history of disease recurrence or subsequent malignancy reported their perceptions of their risk of infertility compared with men never diagnosed with cancer. Survivors were a median age of 37.8 years (range, 22.0-58.7 years) and were 28.4 years from their diagnosis (range, 21.4-39.2 years). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with perceptions of risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 35.9% of the survivors (443 of 1233 survivors) reported perceptions of their risk of infertility that were discordant with their actual risk based on previous cancer treatment exposures. Discordant perceptions were equally common among men exposed to gonadotoxic therapies (36.3%; 311 of 857 men) and those with no history of gonadotoxic exposure (35.1%; 132 of 376 men). Survivors who fathered children (odds ratio [OR], 4.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.74-6.24), had no survivor-focused health care (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.57-5.99), were nonwhite (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.10-4.75), and were of lower income were more likely to report no increased risk of infertility after gonadotoxic treatment. Perceptions of increased risk of infertility among men with no history of gonadotoxic treatment were predicted by never having fathered a child (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.17-3.03), recent participation in survivor-focused health care (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.01-4.42), and higher educational achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

Many male survivors of childhood cancer are unaware of how their cancer treatments could impact their reproductive health, underscoring the need for all patients to receive education regarding their risk of infertility throughout the continuum of cancer care. Cancer 2018;124:2447-55. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

A pilot investigation on impact of participation in a long-term follow-up clinic (LTFU) on breast cancer and cardiovascular screening among women who received chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Women treated with chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at significantly increased risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. HL survivors are recommended to have annual dual screening with mammogram (MMG) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They are also recommended to undergo echocardiogram (echo) 5 years after completion of radiation. We performed a pilot study to characterize the women who are and are not receiving proper dual screening for breast cancer and baseline echo, and to examine the impact of a LTFU clinic consultation on screening.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 114 women treated for HL at University of Minnesota (UMN) between 1993 and 2009 was performed. Demographics, disease and treatment history (age at diagnosis, stage, radiation dose and field, chemotherapy, recurrence) were assessed, as well as screening practices (MMG, MRI, both and echo), participation in LTFU clinic, and recommendations from providers. Data was summated in yes/no (y/n) format; statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Breast cancer and cardiovascular screening outcomes were compared by participation in the LTFU clinic (y/n) using Fisher's exact tests. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty-one of 114 women met inclusion criteria and had follow-up data for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 29 years; 67.6% were diagnosed at stage IIa. Median dose of radiation was 3570 cGy. 56.1% participated in the LTFU clinic at the UMN. 36.6% had dual screening with both MMG and MRI, 41.5% had screening with only MMG, and 19.5% had no screening performed. Women were more likely to have dual screening if they were seen in LTFU clinic vs not seen in LTFU clinic (52.2 vs 16.7%, p = 0.02). 67.5% of women were screened with echo; women were also more likely to have screening with echo if seen in LTFU clinic vs not seen (86.4 vs 44.4%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Many women are not getting the proper dual screening for breast cancer despite their increased risk, with only 36.6% of our study sample getting dual screening. Having a consultation in a LTFU clinic increases dual screening for breast cancer and echo screening for cardiovascular disease. Proper screening allows for detection of secondary breast cancer at earlier stages where treatment can be local therapy. Diagnosing CV disease early could allow for proper preventative treatment or intervention.

An investigation of survivorship clinic attendance among childhood cancer survivors living in a five-state rural region

PURPOSE

Cancer survivorship clinics manage cancer-related health complications and are available primarily in urban areas. We examine how demographic, clinical, and geographic-based characteristics are associated with attendance at the only pediatric survivorship clinic in a largely rural, multistate region.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred sixteen cancer survivors were diagnosed at age ≤ 25 from 1986 to 2005 while living in the region. Cox models incorporating death as a competing risk and generalized estimating equations calculated hazards ratios (HR) for characteristics measured at the clinic's opening. Subjects were followed from the clinic opening their first visit, death, emigration from the catchment area, or December 31, 2014.

RESULTS

Five percent of survivors visited the clinic. Attendance is positively associated with a leukemia or lymphoma diagnosis (HR = 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.72-6.78 vs CNS tumors), previous relapse (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.00-3.19), and residing >100 mi from the clinic (HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.03-4.10). Survivors aged ≥ 31 years at clinic opening (HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.07-0.54) are less likely to attend than younger survivors. Residence between 16 and 100 mi had an inverse association with attendance, although not significant.

CONCLUSION

Survivorship clinics are not widely attended by survivors in this catchment region. Efforts should be made to recruit survivors aged ≥ 31 and diagnosed with CNS tumors. Distance has a complex association with attendance, which could be attributed to the limited availability of preventative services in regions > 100 mi from the clinic.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Survivors living in this catchment region may not be receiving care necessary to prevent severe late effects.

Comparing the Knowledge of Parents and Survivors Who Attend a Survivorship Clinic

Background: This study underscores the importance of the survivor/parent dynamic in understanding the knowledge level of childhood cancer survivors and their parents with regard to cancer diagnosis, treatments, and potential late effects, and to assess the impact of parental knowledge on survivor’s knowledge. Procedure: A convenience sample (N = 219 dyads) consisting of childhood cancer survivors with a parent match was used. Survivors 2 years out from completion of therapy, aged 16 to 25 years, and fluent in English or Spanish completed 2 questionnaires to assess adolescent and young adult and parental knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment, and long-term risks. Results: Data from the survivor/parent dyad confirm that parents are more knowledgeable than their child regarding treatment specifics. However, survivors are more accurate when assessing second tumor and fertility risk. More knowledgeable parents led to more knowledgeable survivors. Conclusions: Although parents were well-informed about treatment specifics, they were not as accurate in identifying risks appropriately. Therefore, education must be directed at both parent and survivors to maximize knowledge.

Impact of shared care program in follow-up of childhood cancer survivors: An intervention study

BACKGROUND

With the growing rate of childhood cancer cure and the risks of sequelae, long-term follow-up (FU) of survivors is a central issue. Several models have been proven far from satisfactory. Shared care FU is the result of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and cancer centers. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of setting up a shared care program based on the patient-centered education of GPs and to evaluate the impact of this model in an intervention study.

METHODS

We compared the FU care achievement in two childhood cancer survivor cohorts in the same pediatric oncology center, (i) control group (n = 134) and (ii) intervention study cohort (n = 137), after setting up the program.

RESULTS

The rate of survivors answering the survey and the rate of patients involved in FU by their GPs were higher in intervention study cohort than in baseline one (132/137 vs. 72/134 and 110/132 vs. 13/72; P ≤ 0.0001). The lack of any FU was definitely lower (10/132 vs. 18/72; P = 0.001) in the intervention study cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this shared care program, survivors overcame distrust in their GP's knowledge and entered the FU program after their GPs had been involved in patient-centered education. Personalized and incentive-based guidance was very useful in helping survivors to adhere to FU. Support of a dedicated long-term FU team was very useful. A nationwide organization, consideration of special needs in subgroups of survivors and sustained funding are needed to adjust the program in the very long term.

Preparing childhood cancer survivors for transition to adult care: The young adult perspective

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) remain at risk for developing treatment-associated health conditions as they age; however, many do not obtain recommended follow-up, putting them at unnecessary risk for morbidity. Educational interventions targeted at providing survivors with the knowledge and skills necessary for healthcare independence might improve adherence and outcomes as they transition care to the adult medical system.

OBJECTIVE

To identify informational needs, educational preferences, and support that young adult CCSs perceive as beneficial for transition from pediatric to adult medical care.

DESIGN/METHOD

Sixteen young adult CCSs (ages 22-39 years) who have transitioned to adult care participated in focus groups led by a trained moderator and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Four major themes emerged: (1) education preferences-pediatric oncology provider as the primary source of information and guidance, enhanced by other formats, and early and ongoing engagement in education; (2) family role in transition-desire for independence and acknowledgement of need for ongoing parental support; (3) expectations for adult providers, such as close relationships, open communication, and care coordination; and (4) knowledge deficits regarding disease/treatment history, risk for long-term complications, and navigation of the adult medical system.

CONCLUSION

Transition education as described by young adult CCSs should be a developmentally appropriate process beginning in early adolescents, primarily administered by pediatric oncology providers, and delivered in multiple formats. While healthcare independence is a goal for young adult CCSs, all stakeholders must recognize that families and providers continue to have an important role supporting survivors with transition logistics and medical decision-making.

Factors Associated With Noncompliance With Long-term Follow-up Care Among Pediatric Cancer Survivors

Most childhood cancer survivors do not receive risk-based care through a survivorship program, but factors associated with dropping out of care are unclear. This study aimed to identify characteristics of pediatric cancer survivors who do not return to a cancer center survivorship program for recommended care after at least 1 visit compared with those who continue to attend. Patient characteristics (demographics, school functioning, psychiatric history) and treatment characteristics (diagnosis, treatment) were abstracted from medical records for all eligible patients. Unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the associations among patient and treatment characteristics and nonattendance. The charts of 400 eligible patients (children below 18, n=123; adults, n=277) were reviewed. Of these, 60.3% of patients had not been seen in clinic within 1 year of their last recommended follow-up appointment. Adult-aged survivors were less likely to return to clinic than child-aged survivors (P<0.001). For child survivors, longer time off treatment was associated with noncompliance with follow-up. For adult survivors, current age, nonwhite race, and longer time off treatment were associated with noncompliance. Additional methods to identify survivors at risk for noncompliance with follow-up and interventions for at-risk survivors are needed to improve survivorship care.

Identifying Barriers Among Childhood Cancer Survivors Transitioning to Adult Health Care

The aim of this study was to identify and describe barriers of young adult childhood cancer survivors transitioning to adult health care within 5 years of leaving a pediatric oncology practice. Several barriers have been identified in the literature, but other obstacles as to why this vulnerable population may be avoiding health care are unknown. This is a descriptive pilot study of a convenience sample of childhood cancer survivors, currently 20 to 25 years of age, who were diagnosed at less than 21 years of age. The Transition to Adult Care Survey assessing survivor barriers is an online survey consisting of 15 questions, with a drop-down menu for answers and 2 open-ended questions. The survey was accessible by smartphone or computer. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe variables of interest. Our population consisted of 48 childhood cancer survivors. Their mean age was 23.21 years. Only 74% reported following through with annual preventive screening, and 57% reported that they consider themselves at risk for further medical problems as a result of their cancer treatment. Lack of knowledge of the importance of health screening may be a potential barrier to consistent follow-up care.

Parental preparedness for late effects and long-term quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Parents of children with cancer desire information regarding the late effects of treatment. In the current study, the authors assessed parents' preparedness for late effects at least 5 years after their child's diagnosis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of all eligible parents of children with cancer between April 2004 and September 2005 at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center within 1 year of diagnosis, and a follow-up questionnaire was administered at least 5 years later.

RESULTS

Approximately 66% of parents of children who were still living, and who were able to be contacted, completed the follow-up questionnaire (91 of 138 parents). Approximately 77% of respondents (70 of 91 respondents) were parents of disease-free survivors and 23% (21 of 91 respondents) were parents of children with recurrent disease. The majority of parents believed they were well prepared for their child's oncology treatment (87%), but fewer felt prepared for future limitations experienced by their children (70%; P = .003 using the McNemar test) or for life after cancer (62%; P<.001). On bivariable analysis among parents of disease-free survivors, parents were more likely to believe themselves to be prepared for future limitations when they also reported that communication with the oncologist helped to address worries regarding the future (odds ratio, 4.50; P = .01). At the time of diagnosis, both parents and physicians underestimated a child's risk of future limitations; 45% of parents and 39% of clinicians predicted future limitations in physical abilities, intelligence, or quality of life, but at the time of the follow-up questionnaire >5 years later, 72% of children experienced limitations in at least 1 domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents believe themselves to be less prepared for survivorship than for treatment. High-quality communication may help parents to feel more prepared for life after cancer therapy. Cancer 2016;122:2587-94. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Skin Cancer Surveillance Behaviors Among Childhood Cancer Survivors

The risk of developing skin cancer is elevated among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), particularly among those treated with radiation. This survey study examined the skin cancer surveillance behaviors of 94 CCS. Approximately 48% of CCS had ever conducted skin self-examination (SSE) and 31% had ever received a physician skin examination. Rates of physician skin examination were 2.5 times higher among CCS treated with radiation compared to those without radiation. However, rates of SSEs did not differ based on treatment history. These findings highlight the need to promote skin cancer surveillance as an important aspect of CCS survivorship care.