Factors related to lipohypertrophy in insulin-treated diabetic patients: role of educational intervention

J. Schreiber L, Wallace EJ, Wylie R, O'Sullivan J, Dolan EB, Duffy GP. Medical devices, smart drug delivery, wearables and technology for the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of metabolic disorders which affect how the body uses glucose impacting approximately 9% of the population worldwide. This review covers the most recent technological advances envisioned to control and/or reverse Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), many of which will also prove effective in treating the other forms of diabetes mellitus. Current standard therapy for T1DM involves multiple daily glucose measurements and insulin injections. Advances in glucose monitors, hormone delivery systems, and control algorithms generate more autonomous and personalised treatments through hybrid and fully automated closed-loop systems, which significantly reduce hypo- and hyperglycaemic episodes and their subsequent complications. Bi-hormonal systems that co-deliver glucagon or amylin with insulin aim to reduce hypoglycaemic events or increase time spent in target glycaemic range, respectively. Stimuli responsive materials for the controlled delivery of insulin or glucagon are a promising alternative to glucose monitors and insulin pumps. By their self-regulated mechanism, these "smart" drugs modulate their potency, pharmacokinetics and dosing depending on patients' glucose levels. Islet transplantation is a potential cure for T1DM as it restores endogenous insulin and glucagon production, but its use is not yet widespread due to limited islet sources and risks of chronic immunosuppression. New encapsulation strategies that promote angiogenesis and oxygen delivery while protecting islets from recipients' immune response may overcome current limiting factors.

The Economic Burden of Insulin Injection-Induced Lipohypertophy. Role of Education: The ISTERP-3 Study

Introduction

The history of insulin-induced skin lipohypertrophy (LH) runs parallel to that of insulin's 100 years, and an average of 47% of insulin-treated patients still suffer from it today. The metabolic and economic effects of LH are significant, with hypoglycemia being the most striking. The objective of the study was to perform a 52-week follow-up of 713 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and LH to detect any differences in the occurrence of hypoglycemic events (HYPOs) and related healthcare costs as well as in LH rates and injection habits between an intensive education intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) provided with a single educational session at the starting point.

Methods

All participants were trained in accurately self-monitoring blood glucose and recording all HYPOs for 6 months, which allowed baseline recordings before they were randomized into the IG, comprising 395 insulin-treated subjects undergoing repeated, structured multimodal education on correct injection techniques as a longstanding behavioral rehabilitation strategy, and the CG, comprising 318 subjects receiving the same structured, multimodal educational session, but only initially.

Results

Changes in LH rate and size and in performance were large in the IG and only slight and transient in the CG. A striking difference in the rate of decrease of HYPOs was also apparent between groups. Indeed, estimated costs of health interventions for severe and symptomatic HYPOs, which were on the order of €70,000 and €9300, respectively, in the two groups at baseline decreased by 5.9 times and 13.7 times, respectively, at the end of follow-up in the IG and by only approximately half in the CG. Full details of the changes occurring as a result of intensive education are provided in the text.

Conclusions

The effect of only initial education in the CG was not significant, thus providing evidence of the virtual worthlessness of a single training session on injection techniques, typical of worldwide daily clinical practice, and easily explaining the extremely high prevalence of LH in insulin-treated patients. Conversely, highly positive effects on LH prevalence and size as well as costs expected from decreased HYPO rate were obtained in the IG. To our knowledge, ours is the first 18-month randomized trial in the field. If our experimental model were to be used as an effective, longstanding behavioral rehabilitation strategy and therefore adapted to real-world settings universally, LH prevalence and costs related to their clinical consequences would be drastically reduced. However, only with a strong, relentless commitment of universities, scientific societies, and patient associations can we achieve this ambitious goal, which would provide great institutional savings and improved quality of life for people with diabetes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02105-5.

Characteristics and morphology of lipohypertrophic lesions in adults with type 1 diabetes with ultrasound screening: an exploratory observational study

INTRODUCTION

Lipohypertrophy is a common complication of exposure to insulin therapy. Despite the prevalence of lipohypertrophy and its potentially hazardous effects on glucose regulation, it remains a relatively understudied problem in diabetes. The objective of this study was to characterize lipohypertrophic tissue using ultrasound in adults with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational study of 74 people with type 1 diabetes from a diabetes center in South East London. Participants' insulin exposed areas were scanned with ultrasound, with a high-frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz). The observed tissue changes were described, measured and graded according to nodule size and thickness of the dermal layer.

RESULTS

Participants mean age and diabetes duration were 40.6 (±14.2) and 18.3 (±10.9) years, respectively, and 60% (n=44) were male. A total of 740 lipohypertrophic nodules were observed, ranging from 1.8 mm to 40 mm in width. The mean (SD/range) number of nodules per participants was 10.4 (±6.2/1-29). Delineation between the dermal layers was disrupted in all current injection sites. In 52 participants (70%), there was a 30% increase in dermal thickness compared with local none injected tissue, and in 36 participants (48%) the increase was 50%. The level of thickness was >3 mm in the abdominal areas of 22 (40%) of these participants and in thighs of eight participants (17.8%). Hypoechogenic areas suggestive of necrotic tissue were observed within the lipohypertrophic nodules of 22 (30%) participants. Needle length and nodule depth were correlated (r=0.69, p<0.001). A conceptual model of the insulin exposed tissue changes observed was constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that insulin-exposed tissue changes are heterogenous and has provided conceptual and grading frameworks for classifying these changes. Further studies are required to establish the clinical implications of these classifications, in relation to glucose regulation and other clinical parameters.

Early detection of cutaneous complications of insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous insulin therapy is associated with important injection site complications, which can influence insulin pharmacokinetics resulting in glycemic fluctuations above and below target levels for blood glucose.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the prevalence and risk factors of cutaneous complications including insulin derived amyloidosis in insulin-injecting diabetes patients and to study the role of ultrasonography (in comparison to gel-assisted palpation) in early diagnosis of lipohypertrophy (LH).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in India, wherein 500 patients injecting insulin for ≥2 years were randomly enrolled and evaluated for the presence of cutaneous complications of insulin therapy through clinical examination, ultrasonography and punch biopsy of skin.

RESULTS

Clinical examination detected LH in 44.6% of patients. Ultrasonography diagnosed additional 13.4% of patients with LH which were missed on clinical examination. Incorrect rotation of sites (P < 0.001) and insulin syringe reusage for more than five times (P < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of LH. Skin biopsy was performed in 100 cases, out of which two patients showed apple green birefringence and its association with insulin was confirmed by positive staining with anti insulin antibody in these two patients.

CONCLUSION

Improper rotation of sites and reuse of needles were the leading causes of LH in Indian diabetic patients. Ultrasonography is more objective and reliable method of detecting LH. Insulin-derived amyloidosis may be a more common complication of insulin therapy than previously thought.

A meta-analysis and meta-regression on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients on insulin therapy

AIMS OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of lipohypertrophy (LH) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients on insulin therapy and identify factors influencing the prevalence rates through a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened from inception to 20th Aug 2020. Data on prevalence was transformed using the logit transformation for pooling the proportions using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. Random-effects meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of the following moderators on the pooled prevalence: male gender, mean age, type of DM, DM duration, duration of insulin therapy, needle re-users, rotation of injection site, HbA_1c, insulin dose, ≥8mm needle users and mean number of injections/day.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included. LH was diagnosed by observation and palpation by all studies. On meta-analysis of data from 26,865 participants, the overall prevalence of LH was found to be 41.8% (95% CI: 35.9% to 47.6%). On region-wise analysis, pooled prevalence of LH in Europe was 44.6% (95% CI: 37.5% to 51.8%) in Africa was 34.8% (95% CI: 16.9% to 52.8%) and in Asia was 41.3% (95% CI: 27.2% to 55.3%). The pooled prevalence of LH in studies only on type 1 and type 2 DM patients was 39.9% (95% CI: 28.3% to 51.6%) and 45.9% (95% CI: 29.5% to 62.4%) respectively. Only insulin duration was found to significantly influence the prevalence of LH on meta-regression.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the prevalence of LH in DM patients on insulin therapy is estimated to be 41.8%. The longer the duration of insulin therapy, the higher is the prevalence of LH.

Insulin Injection Practice and Injection Complications - Results from the Bangladesh Insulin Injection Technique Survey

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is highly prevalent in Bangladesh and insulin is often needed for diabetes control. We lack sufficient data on the insulin injection technique and injection-related complications.

METHODS

The Bangladesh Insulin Injection Technique Survey (BIITS) was conducted in 2018 in 18 centres throughout Bangladesh, involving 847 patients taking insulin for at least 6 months. All of the study subjects were interviewed using a structured questionnaire focusing on key insulin injection parameters.

RESULTS

The mean duration of insulin use by the study subjects was 3.84 (± 4.05) years and the mean daily dose of insulin was 41 (± 25) units. A total of 71.6% participants performed ≤2 injections/day and premixed insulins were the most commonly used insulins. Mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 9.5% (± 2%). The proportion of syringe users and pen-device users was 68.1% and 31.9%, respectively. Most of the participants injected in the abdomen and rotated the injection site(s). The majority lifted the skinfold correctly and inserted the needle at a 90-degree angle, but their dwell times after injections were not adequate. A total of 9.2% of the subjects had injection-site lipohypertrophy (LH) and among them, 38.5% injected into the lesion. Patients with LH had higher HbA1c. Higher duration of insulin use (≥5 years), reusing needles more often (>10 times), and injecting at angles other than 90 degrees were independent predictors of LH. The incidences of hypoglycaemia (36.7%) and hyperglycaemia (67.4%) were very high, and subjects with LH had higher chances of both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Though most (92.1%) of the patients received education about insulin injection initially, it was not repeated in the recent follow-up and was found to be ineffective.

CONCLUSION

A huge gap between the insulin administration guidelines and current practice was observed in this study. Complications of insulin injections were also common. Healthcare providers should pay more attention to insulin education and re-evaluate injection practices from time to time.

Insulin-induced lypodistrophy in hemodialyzed patients: A new challenge for nephrologists?

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common cause of renal failure and ESRD all over the world, and often requires an individualized insulin treatment regimen. Malnutrition, depression-related eating behavior changes, high on-off-dialysis day-to-day glycemic variability and frequent hypoglycemic events occurring during or immediately after dialysis make it hard to identify best insulin dosage in hemodialyzed patients. This suggests a prudent attitude including non-stringent control, despite which repeated hypoglycemia quite often occurs in such patients. When looking for possible sources of hypoglycemia, health professionals too often overlook the identification of skin lipodystrophy (LD) due to an incorrect insulin injection technique. This mini-review focuses on the high frequency (57%) of LD in a cohort of 1004 insulin-treated people with DM on dialysis consecutively referring to our joint medical centers, and on its relationship with hypoglycemia and glycemic control/variability. When taking on such patients, care team members accept to face a complex disease burdened with several risk factors requiring high professional skills, and have to keep in mind also the possible presence of any LD areas eventually interfering with expected results. A timely educational intervention on the correct injection technique can help reduce the high risk of hypoglycemia and large glycemic variability in dialysed people with DM.

The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don't Know or Teach Can Make a Difference

IN BRIEF To be consistently effective, insulin must be delivered into subcutaneous tissue. If insulin is delivered intramuscularly, its uptake and action become variably faster, leading to suboptimal, inconsistent glucose control. The best strategy to avoid intramuscular injection is to use the shortest needles available. Injection sites should be rotated systematically to prevent lipohypertrophy, which also substantially affects insulin uptake and action. New evidence-based insulin delivery recommendations are available, and awareness of them should lead to more effective use of insulin therapy, improved clinical outcomes, and considerable cost savings.

Insulin Injection Technique in China Compared with the Rest of the World

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 9 million people in China use insulin but little is known of their injection techniques (IT). Our aim was to understand IT in China via direct examination and a detailed survey.

METHODS

Injection Technique Questionnaire (ITQ) results of 3853 patients from 20 representative centers in China were compared with the Rest of World (ROW).

RESULTS

Insulin pens are used by 92% of Chinese insulin injectors, with > 3/4 using 4- or 5-mm pen needles. This is consistent with Chinese BMI values (and thus subcutaneous fat thickness) being lower than in ROW, raising the risk of IM (intramuscular) injections with longer needles. Total daily insulin dose is ~ 33 IU in China vs. 45 IU elsewhere. Lipohypertrophy (LH) rates are lower than in ROW, but still found in at least 25% of Chinese patients. Patients apparently do not realize they have LH or are unaware of the hazards of injecting into LH since many of them do so, and those who do use a mean of 11 IU more of insulin than non-LH patients. This incremental insulin use possibly costs the Chinese health care service around 2 billion RMB annually. Needle reuse is also frequent in China (78% vs. 48% ROW), and the high cost of pen needles is the main reason patients cite for reusing (25% use a single needle > 10×).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals many areas in which Chinese professionals and patients can optimize injection practices and thereby improve outcomes and reduce costs. The official guidelines of the Chinese Diabetes Society, based on the FITTER recommendations, offer a roadmap for reaching this goal.

FUNDING

BD Diabetes Care. Plain language summary available for this article.

Ultrasound detection of insulin-induced lipohypertrophy in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To define standard criteria for the detection of lipohypertrophy using ultrasonography and to determine the accuracy of this method.

METHOD

Individuals using insulin therapy for ≥2 years with unknown lipohypertrophy status were enrolled at a diabetes education centre. A team of diabetes educator nurses performed a clinical examination for evidence of lipohypertrophy and a separate team of ultrasonographers examined participants in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

The echo signature for lipohypertrophy consisted of location in the subcutaneous layer and lesions that were 1) well circumscribed either by hyperechoic foci with defined borders or a nodular shape with a hypoechoic halo, 2) heterogeneous in echotexture compared with surrounding tissue, 3) associated with distortion of surrounding connective tissue with 4) absence of vascularity and 5) absence of capsule. Ultrasonography identified individuals with lipohypertrophy significantly more frequently than inspection or palpation (P<0.0001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate (κ=0.50) and limited by the presence of subclinical lesions in 73% of the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound detection of lipohypertrophy is consistent with clinical examination and is reproducible using a defined echo signature. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no: NCT02348099).

Turkish Insulin Injection Techniques Study: Complications of Injecting Insulin Among Turkish Patients with Diabetes, Education They Received, and the Role of Health Care Professional as Assessed by Survey Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

Using the Turkish and rest of world (ROW) Injection Technique Questionnaire (ITQ) data we address key insulin injection complications.

METHODS

Summarized in first ITQ paper.

RESULTS

Nearly one-third of Turkish insulin users described lesions consistent with lipohypertrophy (LH) at their injection sites and 27.4% were found to have LH by the examining nurse (using visual inspection and palpation). LH lesions in the abdomen and thigh of Turkish patients are slightly smaller than those measured in ROW but more than half of Turkish patients who have LH continue to inject into them at least daily. More than a quarter of Turkish patients have frequent unexplained hypoglycemia and nearly 2 out of 5 have glycemic variability, both of which have been linked to the presence of LH and the habit of injecting into it. Nearly half of Turkish injectors report having pain on injection. Of these, just over half report having painful injections only several times a month or year (i.e., not with every injection). In Turkey the diabetes nurse has by far the major role in teaching patients how to inject. Nearly 40% of Turkish injectors get their sites checked at least annually, and a larger proportion than ROW had received recent (within the last 12 months) instruction on how to inject properly.

CONCLUSION

Turkish patients and professionals have clearly made progress in injection technique, but there are still considerable challenges ahead which the new Turkish guidelines will help address.

FUNDING

BD Diabetes Care.

Effect of Insulin-Induced Lipodystrophy on Glycemic Control among Children and Adolescents with Diabetes in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Lipodystrophy is one of the clinical complications of insulin injection that affects insulin absorption and leads to poor glycemic control.

OBJECTIVE

To assess insulin-induced lipodystrophy and glycemic control.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was done on 176 diabetic children and adolescents who inject insulin for a minimum of one year. First, anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded in questionnaire, and then observation and palpation techniques were used in assessing lipodystrophy.

RESULT

Out of the total 176 participants, 103 (58.5%) had insulin-induced lipodystrophy, of them 100 (97.1%) had lipohypertrophy and 3 (2.9%) had lipoatrophy. Being younger, failure to rotate the injection site every week and multiple reuse of insulin syringe had significant influence in development of insulin-induced lipohypertrophy. Lipohypertrophy in turn was associated with the use of higher dose of insulin and nonoptimal glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

Findings of this study revealed that in spite of using recombinant human insulin, the magnitude of the lipohypertrophy still remained high. Therefore, a routine workup of insulin-injecting patients for such complication is necessary, especially in the individuals who have a nonoptimal glycemic control.

Clinical Implications of Lipohypertrophy Among People with Type 1 Diabetes in India

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) at insulin injection sites is a common but preventable complication in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We evaluated the prevalence, contributing risk factors, and consequences of LH, specifically the glycemic variability (GV) among T1DM patients.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in India, wherein 139 subjects with T1DM were randomly selected and evaluated for the presence of LH through visual and palpation examinations. Demography, anthropometry, and injecting practices were evaluated using a validated questionnaire and their effect on LH was determined. Subsequently, the effect of LH on GV and unexplained hypoglycemia (UH) was studied. Mean glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGEs), and continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA) were assessed in a subset of patients who injected insulin alternately in LH and non-LH sites.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LH was 69.8%, and was significantly higher in adults than in children (P = 0.038). Improper rotation of sites (P < 0.0001) and insulin syringe reusage for more than five times (P = 0.009) significantly increase the risk of LH. The presence of LH has a significant effect on GV and UH with adjusted odds ratios of 17.65 (P < 0.0001) and 28.02 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Ambulatory glucose monitoring on a subset of patients confirmed that the mean glucose, MAGE, and CONGA were higher when subjects injected insulin at LH sites than at non-LH sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Improper rotation of sites and reuse of needles are the leading causes of LH in Indian T1DM patients, which, in turn, significantly increases the risk of GV and UH.

Insulin-Related Lipohypertrophy: Lipogenic Action or Tissue Trauma?

Lipohypertrophy has been suggested as an outcome of lipogenic action of insulin and/or injection-related tissue trauma. In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the predictors of lipohypertrophy in 372 type 1 diabetes patients (mean age 17.1 years) receiving subcutaneous insulin with pen and/or syringes for ≥3 months. On examining injection sites with inspection and palpation technique, 62.1% patients demonstrated lipohypertrophy. Univariate analysis showed that gender, BMI, HbA1c, injection device, rotation, injection area, needle length, insulin regimen, and total daily dose of insulin were associated with lipohypertrophy (p < 0.05). Notably, the mean needle reuse was comparable in patients with or without lipohypertrophy (8.1 vs. 7.2, p = 0.534). In multivariate logistic regression, gender, HbA1c, TDD, injection devices, and needle length lost its significance. Further, injections over smaller area (≤8.5 × 5.5 cm) and non-rotation of sites were found to be strongest independent predictor of lipohypertrophy (p < 0.0005 for both) with increased odds of 23.2 (95% CI 9.1-59.2) and 6.3 (95% CI 3.4-11.9) times, respectively. Being underweight was also a significant independent predictor (odds ratio [OR] 13.0 [95% CI 2.2-75.2], p = 0.004). Compared to rapid plus long-acting analogs, regular insulin plus long-acting analogs and conventional premixed insulin users had 3.2 (95% CI 1.5-6.8, p = 0.003) and 4.6 (95% CI 1.4-15.7, p = 0.014) fold higher risk of lipohypertrophy (mean injection frequency 4.01 vs. 4.01 vs. 2.09, respectively). Sub-group analysis showed that lipohypertrophy was 79% less likely in patients with multiple daily injections (≥4) than twice-daily regimen (OR 0.21, p < 0.0005). Moreover, lipohypertrophy was reduced to half with bolus doses of rapid-acting insulin analogs than regular insulin (p = 0.003), even though mean injection frequency was comparable (4.01 vs. 3.93, p = 0.229). This difference was statistically insignificant for basal doses with NPH or long-acting analogs (p = 0.069). Therefore, injection area, rotation, BMI, and insulin regimen are the best predictors of lipohypertrophy and together could correctly identify lipohypertrophy status in 84.4% patients with excellent discrimination capability (AUC = 0.906, p < 0.0005). In conclusion, findings of our study suggest that delivering rapidly absorbed insulin analogs over large injection area along with greater split of total daily doses reduce insulin-induced lipogenesis and outplay tissue trauma added through frequent injections and needle reuse.

An Effective Intervention for Diabetic Lipohypertrophy: Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Multicenter Study in France

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is highly prevalent and is potentially harmful to insulin-injecting patients.

METHODS

In this study, we assessed the impact of injection technique (IT) education, including use of a 4-mm pen needle on insulin-treated patients with clinically observed LH in a randomized, controlled, prospective multicenter study in France with follow-up of 6 months. Intensive education and between-visit reinforcement were given to the intervention group. Control patients received similar messages at study outset.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were recruited (age 52.1 ± 15.7 years; men 70.7%; body mass index >30 kg/m²: 34.2%; type 1: 53.7%; years with diabetes mellitus: 18.1 ± 10.5), of which 109 patients were included in the final analysis. The intervention group (n = 53) showed a significant decrease of total daily dose of insulin (average at baseline: 54.1 IU) at 3 months (T-3) and 6 months (T-6), reaching just over 5 IU versus baseline (P = 0.035). Corresponding, although not significant, decreases occurred in controls (n = 56); between-group differences were not significant. There were significant decreases in HbA1c (up to 0.5%) at T-3 and T-6 in both groups, with no significant differences between groups. A significant number of intervention patients improved their IT habits; about half achieved ideal IT habits by T-3 versus a quarter of control patients. By T-6, 2/3 of intervention patients achieved either ideal or acceptable IT habits, while only 1/3 of control patients did.

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention was effective in both study arms, however, to a greater degree and more rapidly in the intervention group. Widespread application of this intervention could be highly cost-effective.

Efecto de la lipohipertrofia en el control metabólico de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2

La lipodistrofia (lipohipertrofia, lipoatrofia) es una complicación dada por la técnica inadecuada de inyección subcutánea de insulina. Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 46 años con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 descontrolada, en tratamiento con insulina glargina 45UI/día, sin control glucométrico y con múltiples ajustes y hospitalizaciones. Al ingreso, el automonitoreo muestra glucometrías basales y posprandiales fuera de metas, glucemia basal de 299 mg/dL y HbA1c de 11%. Al interrogatorio, se evidencian fallas en la técnica de aplicación de insulina, en particular falta de rotación del sitio de aplicación. En el examen físico se encuentra lipohipertrofia dada por panículo adiposo infraumbilical prominente bilateral e induración del tejido celular subcutáneo; en ecografía se visualiza infiltración grasa de rectos anteriores. Se da instrucción a la paciente sobre la correcta técnica de aplicación de insulina con rotación diaria del sitio de aplicación, descanso de zonas con lipohipertrofia y guía para automonitoreo.El automonitoreo en los 10 primeros días mostró mejoría de glucometrías basales hasta 116 mg/dL y valor limítrofe de 75 mg/dL, comparados con promedio de glucometría basal previa de 242 mg/dL con la misma insulina y dosis. Se hizo seguimiento estrecho para definir dosis requerida de insulina y vigilar posible hipoglucemia, con mejoría en la HbA1c de 9.2% y 8.8% a los 4 y 11 meses, respectivamente.

Prevalence of lipohypertrophy in insulin-treated diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Insulin-treated diabetes patients are at high risk for lipohypertrophy (LH), but this clinical problem has been overlooked by some medical professionals. In addition, studies differed from each other significantly in regard to the prevalence of LH. The present systematic review aimed to determine pooled prevalence levels of LH among insulin-injecting diabetes patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Scopus) were searched for eligible studies from their inception until April 2017, and reference lists were searched manually to identify additional studies. Studies containing data on LH in patients with diabetes mellitus were included. Meta-analysis was carried out with a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies with a total of 12,493 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of LH was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-46%, I2 = 99.1%). The main influence on LH was the type of diabetes mellitus. The pooled prevalence of LH among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was higher than patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (49%, 95% CI 23-74% vs 34%, 95% CI 19-49%). The pooled prevalence of LH of studies involving a mixed type of diabetes mellitus was 37% (95% CI 25-48%, I2 = 98.3%).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LH was high in insulin-treated diabetes patients. It showed that diabetes nurses should screen for LH regularly in their patients, and teach them how to prevent LH in their daily management of diabetes mellitus.

Indian Injection Technique Study: Injecting Complications, Education, and the Health Care Professional

INTRODUCTION

Using the Indian and rest of world (ROW) injection technique questionnaire (ITQ) data, we address key insulin injection complications.

METHODS

In 2015 we conducted an ITQ survey throughout India involving 1011 patients. Indian values were compared with those from 41 other countries participating in the ITQ, known here as ROW.

RESULTS

More than a quarter of Indian insulin users described lesions consistent with lipohypertrophy (LH) at their injection sites and approximately 1 in 5 were found to have LH by the examining nurse (using visual inspection and palpation). Just over half of Indian injectors report having pain on injection. Of these, 4 out of 5 report having painful injections only several times a month or year (i.e., not with every injection). Doctors and diabetes educators in India (as opposed to nurses) have a larger role in teaching patients how to inject than they do in ROW. Despite this specialized approach, a very high percentage of patients report that they have not been trained (at least cannot remember being trained) in a wide range of essential injection topics. Only about 30% of Indian injectors get their sites checked at least annually, with nearly a third only having sites checked when they specifically complained and nearly 4 out of 10 never having had their sites checked.

CONCLUSION

Indian HCPs can clearly do a better job covering all the vital topics essential to proper injection habits.

Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices

INTRODUCTION

It was estimated that 3.2 million Indians with diabetes injected insulin in 2010, but little is known about the techniques used.

METHODS

In 2015 we conducted an injection technique questionnaire (ITQ) survey throughout India involving 1011 patients. Indian values were compared with those from 41 other countries participating in the ITQ, known here as rest of world (ROW).

RESULTS

Mean HbA1c was 8.6. BMI values in India were 1.5-3 units lower than in ROW depending on patient group, meaning the risk of intramuscular (IM) injections is high in India. The mean total daily dose (TDD) of insulin was lower in every category of Indian patient than in ROW, perhaps reflecting the lower BMI. Needle reuse, whether with pens or syringes, is much higher in India than ROW and so is the number of times the needle is used. The majority (56.8%) of Indian insulin users performed only 2 injections/day as opposed to ROW where 45% of patients performed at least 4 injections/day. Indian patients inject insulin in the thighs more often than patients in ROW, a site where IM injections are more risky. Many patients do not have proper access to sharps containers or have other risk factors that could lead to blood-borne pathogen spread. More than 60% of used sharps in India go into the rubbish, with nearly 12% not even having the minimum protection of a cap.

DISCUSSION

The shortest needles are very common in India; however, the level of needle reuse is high. Multiple daily injections therapy is not as common in India as ROW. More focus needs to be given to dwell times under the skin, reconstitution of cloudy insulins, skinfolds, and safe sharps disposal.

UK lipohypertrophy interventional study

INTRODUCTION

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is one of the most common complications of insulin therapy. We conducted a prospective study in 18 UK centres to assess the impact of a targeted LH intervention on a range of clinical, biological and socio-economic parameters.

METHODS

Seventy-five insulin-injecting patients were recruited randomly and were followed prospectively for 3-6months, with results compared to baseline values. Interventions included the use of an intensive education program and a switch to a 4mm pen needle.

RESULTS

At all injection sites LH decreased significantly by the end of the study, either disappearing completely or shrinking by approximately 50% from its original diameter. Injections into LH decreased by more than 75% by the end. Most patients were not correctly rotating injection sites at the beginning but by the end most were, by a 5-fold margin. Only 1/3 of our subjects used the 4mm needle at the beginning of the study, however, virtually all did by study end. The mean HbA1c improved by more than 4mmol/L and there were significantly lower levels of unexpected hypoglycaemia and glucose variability. Total daily doses of insulin dropped by an average of 5.6 IU by study end.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe the impressive clinical improvements seen with training to prevent LH can be achieved by wide adoption of the interventions outlined in this study.

Lipohypertrophy in China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Insulin Consumption, and Clinical Impact

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a complication of insulin therapy. We assessed LH prevalence, risk factors, insulin usage, and clinical and health economic effects in China.

METHODS

In four cities, 401 adult patients injecting insulin ≥1 year were surveyed for diabetes/insulin injection history and practices, pen needle reimbursement (PNR), and health resource utilization, followed by structured examination and HbA1c testing. Differences between those with and without LH were evaluated by Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Insulin costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients were 59.6 ± 11.5 years old; 50% male; 93.5% type 2 diabetes. LH prevalence was 53.1%. Compared to those without LH, patients with LH had higher body mass index (BMI; 26 vs. 24.8 kg/m²) and HbA1c (8.2% vs. 7.7% [66 vs. 61 mmol/mol]), took 11 IU (0.13 IU/kg or 31.7%) more insulin costing $1.4 versus $1.0 (RMB 9.5 vs. 6.8) daily, reused PNs more times, and had less PNR (all P ≤ 0.003). LH patients correctly rotated injection sites less often (67.6% vs. 92.3%, P < 0.0001). By stepwise logistic regression, BMI, needle reuse frequency, and PNR remained modestly associated with LH prevalence (odds ratios [OR] <1.9; P ≤ 0.03); weight-adjusted insulin dose and incorrect site rotation showed ORs of nearly 7 and 8.4, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Extrapolated to 9 million insulin-injecting patients in China and adjusted for therapy adherence, LH-related excess annual insulin consumption cost is estimated at nearly $297 million (RMB 2 billion).

CONCLUSIONS

LH is common in China and associated with worse glycemic control, despite nearly one-third greater insulin consumption, with large cost implications. Proper injection technique education may reduce LH prevalence.

New Insulin Delivery Recommendations

Many primary care professionals manage injection or infusion therapies in patients with diabetes. Few published guidelines have been available to help such professionals and their patients manage these therapies. Herein, we present new, practical, and comprehensive recommendations for diabetes injections and infusions. These recommendations were informed by a large international survey of current practice and were written and vetted by 183 diabetes experts from 54 countries at the Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy: Expert Recommendations (FITTER) workshop held in Rome, Italy, in 2015. Recommendations are organized around the themes of anatomy, physiology, pathology, psychology, and technology. Key among the recommendations are that the shortest needles (currently the 4-mm pen and 6-mm syringe needles) are safe, effective, and less painful and should be the first-line choice in all patient categories; intramuscular injections should be avoided, especially with long-acting insulins, because severe hypoglycemia may result; lipohypertrophy is a frequent complication of therapy that distorts insulin absorption, and, therefore, injections and infusions should not be given into these lesions and correct site rotation will help prevent them; effective long-term therapy with insulin is critically dependent on addressing psychological hurdles upstream, even before insulin has been started; inappropriate disposal of used sharps poses a risk of infection with blood-borne pathogens; and mitigation is possible with proper training, effective disposal strategies, and the use of safety devices. Adherence to these new recommendations should lead to more effective therapies, improved outcomes, and lower costs for patients with diabetes.

Insulin administration: selecting the appropriate needle and individualizing the injection technique

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes who receive insulin therapy often fail to meet their targets for metabolic control with insulin injections. Their inadequate glycemic control may be related to incorrect injection procedure.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the latest data related to insulin injection and needle characteristics, which play an integral role in patient satisfaction. Searches of Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were conducted. Results show that optimal insulin injection can facilitate glycemic control in pediatric and adult patients. In general, needles shorter than 8 mm are appropriate for normal weight, obese pediatric and adult patients. However, body mass index, gender, race, age and injection site can influence the depth of subcutaneous tissue and thus, the desired needle size and injection technique. Although the abdomen, thighs and buttocks are all recommended injection sites, abdominal injections disperse insulin slightly more rapidly than thigh injections.

EXPERT OPINION

Wider acceptance of needles shorter than 6 mm will occur with more evidence of their safety and efficacy, particularly in children. Development of shorter and thinner needles to make injections even easier and less burdensome may be expected in the future.

The Third Injection Technique Workshop in Athens (TITAN)

The first Injection Technique workshop brought together endocrinologists and injection experts from around the world in Strasbourg in 1997. From its work came groundbreaking recommendations which advanced best practices in areas such as the use of a skin fold when injecting. The second Injection Technique workshop, with an expanded format including nurses and diabetes educators, took place in Barcelona in 2000. The initial stimulus to use shorter injecting needles can be said to date from this meeting. The third Injection Technique workshop was held in Athens in September 2009 and involved 127 experts from across the globe. After a comprehensive review of all publications since 2000 as well as several unpublished studies, the attendees divided into smaller groups to debate and draft new injecting recommendations based on the new data and their collective experience. This paper summarizes all the formal presentations given at this practical consensus workshop.

New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes

AIM

Injections administered by patients are one of the mainstays of diabetes management. Proper injection technique is vital to avoiding intramuscular injections, ensuring appropriate delivery to the subcutaneous tissues and avoiding common complications such as lipohypertrophy. Yet few formal guidelines have been published summarizing all that is known about best practice. We propose new injection guidelines which are thoroughly evidence-based, written and vetted by a large group of international injection experts.

METHODS

A systematic literature study was conducted for all peer-reviewed studies and publications which bear on injections in diabetes. An international group of experts met regularly over a two-year period to review this literature and draft the recommendations. These were then presented for review and revision to 127 experts from 27 countries at the TITAN workshop in September, 2009.

RESULTS

Of 292 articles reviewed, 157 were found to meet the criteria of relevance to the recommendations. Each recommendation was graded by the weight it should have in daily practice and by its degree of support in the medical literature. The topics covered include The Role of the Professional, Psychological Challenges, Education, Site Care, Storage, Suspension and Priming, Injecting Process, Proper Use of Pens and Syringes, Insulin analogues, Human and Pre-mixed Insulins, GLP-1 analogs, Needle Length, Skin Folds, Lipohypertrophy, Rotation, Bleeding and Bruising, Pregnancy, Safety and Disposal.

CONCLUSION

These injecting recommendations provide practical guidance and fill an important gap in diabetes management. If followed, they should help ensure comfortable, effective and largely complication-free injections.

The management of lipohypertrophy in diabetes care

Lipohypertrophy has been a recognized complication of insulin therapy for many years, yet research shows that its prevalence in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes remains high. The problem for the patient is that the injection of insulin into a site of lipohypertrophy, although painless, may lead to erratic absorption of the insulin, with the potential for poor glycaemic control and unpredictable hypoglycaemia. Despite the important implications of this for diabetes control in insulin-injecting patients, there is a dearth of information and completed research into the condition. This article raises awareness of lipohypertrophy by reviewing the available literature on the prevention, identification and management of the condition from a nursing perspective. Recommendations for medical and nursing practice in diabetes care to improve prevention and management of lipohypertrophy are made.