Is the Combination of Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Vancomycin Associated with Development of Acute Kidney Injury? A Meta-analysis

A National Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Effects of Cefepime Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam on the Development of Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Septic Shock

BACKGROUND

Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics used to treat patients with potential gram-negative bacterial sepsis. Piperacillin-tazobactam has been shown to be associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, it has not been compared with cefepime in patients with septic shock. We compared the effects of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam on the incidence of severe AKI in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter, inverse probability-of-treatment weighted cohort study conducted in 220 geographically diverse community and teaching hospitals across the United States. Adult patients were included if they had septic shock on hospital admission and received cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. The proportions of patients in whom stage 3 AKI occurred during hospitalization were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 8427 patients included in the final cohort, 4569 received cefepime and 3858 received piperacillin-tazobactam. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 66.2 (15.2) years, and 45.3% were female; the mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 48 (24) mL/min/1.73 m2 on the day of admission. In the weighted cohort, stage 3 AKI occurred in 9.9% receiving cefepime and 9.8% receiving piperacillin-tazobactam (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, .84-1.15]; P = .82). In terms of secondary outcomes, there was no significant difference between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam with regard to renal replacement therapy, in-hospital death, major adverse kidney events, stage 1 AKI, stage 2 AKI, maximum recorded serum creatinine, or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hospitalized patients with septic shock, there was no difference between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam in the occurrence of severe AKI.

Comparison of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin (TZP-VAN) with piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin (TZP-TEI) for the risk of acute kidney injury (CONCOMITANT): A prospective observational, multinational, multi-centre cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Both vancomycin (VAN) and teicoplanin (TEI) augment the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) when combined with piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). We aimed to compare the risk of AKI among patients receiving TZP-VAN vs. TZP-TEI.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multinational, multicentre cohort study conducted in 12 centres from Turkiye, Italy, and Spain between 1 June 2022, and 31 December 2023. The primary outcome was the occurrence of AKI between the first day of antibiotic treatment and the third day after completing therapy, according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score match analyses were employed to adjust for confounding variables. Stratified Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the time-to-AKI between the comparison groups.

RESULTS

Of 187 patients (TZP-TEI, n = 102; TZP-VAN, n = 85), the AKI occurred in 21 patients (24.7%) who received TZP-VAN and in 15 patients (14.7%) with TZP-TEI (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% CI: 0.91-3.97; P = 0.087). After adjusting for confounding variables with multivariable analysis, TZP-VAN was not associated with increased odds of AKI compared with TZP-TEI; with an adjusted OR of 2.24 (95% CI: 0.78-6.42; P = 0.133). In propensity-score matched analysis (n = 49 pairs), the AKI risk was similar between the two groups (OR, 2.10; 95% CI: 0.67-6.50; P = 0.199). The stratified Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no difference between the treatment groups in terms of time-to-AKI (log-rank test, P = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of AKI in TZP-VAN was similar to that in TZP-TEI. These results should be confirmed in randomized controlled trials.

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes of AKI in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Key Points

The cumulative incidence of AKI diagnosis post–hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 12.9%. Calcineurin inhibitor use was associated with the highest cumulative incidence, 21.6%, after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients with AKI with hypertension/hypertensive disease had a 30-day survival probability of 63.9% (hazard ratio, 4.86, 95% confidence interval, 3.58 to 6.60). Patients with AKI were 2.5 times more likely to experience composite hospitalization and/or mortality at 30 days. Of patients who developed AKI, dialysis dependence has nearly tripled since 2014.

Background

AKI is a common complication in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with a reported prevalence ranging from 68% to 84%. Few multicenter pediatric studies comprehensively assess the epidemiologic associations and clinical outcomes associated with AKI development.

Methods

An observational, retrospective analysis was conducted using an aggregated electronic health record data platform. The study population consisted of pediatric patients (age <18 years) who underwent HSCT over a 20-year period. The study groups consisted of patients with an encounter diagnosis of AKI (n =713) and those without AKI (n =4455). Both groups were propensity matched for age, sex, race, prior cancer diagnosis, and other comorbidities. End points were incidence, mortality risk, clinical outcomes, and prevalence of dialysis dependence. Competing risks analysis, Cox proportional hazard analyses, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and incidence/prevalence rates were calculated.

Results

After matching, 688 patients were identified. Cumulative incidence of AKI diagnosis post-HSCT was 13.7%. Hypertensive disease, calcineurin inhibitors, and vancomycin were the most prevalent risk factors for AKI, with calcineurin inhibitors showing the highest cumulative incidence (21.6%). Patients with AKI with hypertensive disease had a survival probability of 63.9% at 30 days, followed by calcineurin inhibitors (64.4%) and vancomycin (65.9%). Patients with AKI were 1.7 times more likely to experience composite hospitalization and/or mortality at 30 days. At 365 days post-HSCT, patients with AKI had higher rates of all-cause emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, and mechanical ventilation compared with non-AKI. Of patients who developed AKI, the prevalence of dialysis dependence has nearly tripled since 2014.

Conclusions

The findings highlight a strong association between specific risk factors, such as hypertension, calcineurin inhibitor use, and vancomycin use, with increased mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AKI after HSCT. These results emphasize the need for preventative actions such as 24-hour BP monitoring and discontinuation of potential nephrotoxic medications.

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Association of piperacillin and vancomycin exposure on acute kidney injury during combination therapy

Objectives

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-documented adverse effect observed with piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with vancomycin. The pharmacokinetics of these antibiotics when given in combination have not been previously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with and without AKI.

Methods

Ninety adult patients, who received at least 72 h of vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam combination therapy and had available serum concentrations of vancomycin and piperacillin were included in the study. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine within 7 days from baseline. Median daily AUCs were calculated in those with nephrotoxicity (vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'N') versus those without nephrotoxicity (vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'WN') during the first 7 days of combination therapy.

Results

The overall incidence of AKI in those receiving vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam was 20% (18/90). The median daily vancomycin AUCs did not differ between the vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'WN' and vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'N' groups. Although not statistically significant, the median daily vancomycin AUCs in the vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'N' group were numerically greater on Day 5 and trended downwards thereafter. For the piperacillin group, the median daily AUCs did not vary between groups, except on Day 7 where the vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'WN' group had statistically greater median piperacillin AUC than the vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam 'N' group (P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Utilizing serum creatinine-defined AKI, our study did not find any significant differences in vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam exposure between the groups with and without nephrotoxicity. These data indicate that vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam should not be avoided due to the risk of overexposure; instead, clinicians should continue to use these therapies cautiously.

Iohexol-Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate and Urinary Biomarker Changes between Vancomycin and Vancomycin Plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in a Translational Rat Model

Recent clinical studies have reported additive nephrotoxicity with the combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, preclinical models have failed to replicate this finding. This study assessed differences in iohexol-measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary injury biomarkers among rats receiving this antibiotic combination. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received either intravenous vancomycin, intraperitoneal piperacillin-tazobactam, or both for 96 h. Iohexol-measured GFR was used to quantify real-time kidney function changes. Kidney injury was evaluated with the urinary biomarkers kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Compared to the control, rats that received vancomycin had numerically lower GFRs after drug dosing on day 3. Rats in this group also had elevations in urinary KIM-1 on experimental days 2 and 4. Increasing urinary KIM-1 was found to correlate with decreasing GFR on experimental days 1 and 3. Rats that received vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (vancomycin+piperacillin-tazobactam) did not exhibit worse kidney function or injury biomarkers than rats receiving vancomycin alone. The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam does not cause additive nephrotoxicity in a translational rat model. Future clinical studies investigating this antibiotic combination should employ more sensitive biomarkers of kidney function and injury, similar to those utilized in this study.

A Large-Scale Multicenter Retrospective Study on Nephrotoxicity Associated With Empiric Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in the ICU.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a difference exist in the association between commonly prescribed empiric antibiotics on ICU admission (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, and vancomycin and meropenem) and acute kidney injury?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the eICU Research Institute, which contains records for ICU stays between 2010 and 2015 across 335 hospitals. Patients were enrolled if they received vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, or vancomycin and meropenem exclusively. Patients initially admitted to the ED were included. Patients with hospital stay duration of < 1 h, receiving dialysis, or with missing data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 based on serum creatinine component. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the control (vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime) and treatment (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) groups, and ORs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the effect of longer courses of combination therapy and patients with renal insufficiency on admission.

RESULTS

Thirty-five thousand six hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, n = 27,459; vancomycin and cefepime, n = 6,371; vancomycin and meropenem, n = 1,824). Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury and initiation of dialysis when compared with that of both vancomycin and cefepime (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.49]; dialysis: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]) and vancomycin and meropenem (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.27 [95%, 1.06-1.52]; dialysis: OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.23-2.00]). The odds of acute kidney injury developing was especially pronounced in patients without renal insufficiency receiving a longer duration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy compared with vancomycin and meropenem therapy.

INTERPRETATION

VPT is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than both vancomycin and cefepime and vancomycin and meropenem in patients in the ICU, especially for patients with normal initial kidney function requiring longer durations of therapy. Clinicians should consider vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity for patients in the ICU.

Mechanisms of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Nephrotoxicity: Piperacillin/Tazobactam-Induced Direct Tubular Damage in Mice

Piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) is one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics for critically ill patients in intensive care. PT has been reported to cause direct nephrotoxicity; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We investigated the mechanisms underlying PT nephrotoxicity using a mouse model. The kidneys and sera were collected 24 h after PT injection. Serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and renal pathologies, including inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis, were examined. Serum BUN, creatinine, and NGAL levels significantly increased in PT-treated mice. We observed increased IGFBP7, KIM-1, and NGAL expression in kidney tubules. Markers of oxidative stress, including 8-OHdG and superoxide dismutase, also showed a significant increase, accompanied by mitochondrial damage and apoptosis. The decrease in the acyl-coA oxidase 2 and Bcl2/Bax ratio also supports that PT induces mitochondrial injury. An in vitro study using HK-2 cells also demonstrated mitochondrial membrane potential loss, indicating that PT induces mitochondrial damage. PT appears to exert direct nephrotoxicity, which is associated with oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in the kidney tubular cells. Given that PT alone or in combination with vancomycin is the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in patients at high risk of acute kidney injury, caution should be exercised.

Iohexol-measured glomerular filtration rate and urinary biomarker changes between vancomycin and vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam in a translational rat model

Recent clinical studies have reported additive nephrotoxicity with the combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. However, preclinical models have failed to replicate this finding. This study assessed differences in iohexol-measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary injury biomarkers among rats receiving this antibiotic combination. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received either intravenous vancomycin, intraperitoneal piperacillin-tazobactam, or both for 96 hours. Iohexol-measured GFR was used to quantify real-time kidney function changes. Kidney injury was evaluated via the urinary biomarkers: kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Compared to the control, rats that received vancomycin had numerically lower GFR after drug dosing on day 3. Rats in this group also had elevations in urinary KIM-1 on experimental days 2 and 4. Increasing urinary KIM-1 was found to correlate with decreasing GFR on experimental days 1 and 3. Rats that received vancomycin+piperacillin-tazobactam did not exhibit worse kidney function or injury biomarkers compared to vancomycin alone. The combination of vancomycin+piperacillin-tazobactam does not cause additive nephrotoxicity in a translational rat model. Future clinical studies investigating this antibiotic combination should employ more sensitive biomarkers of kidney function and injury, similar to those utilized in this study.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury and Fracture-Related Infection After Antibiotic Prophylaxis With Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Open Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of prophylactic piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) on inpatient acute kidney injury (AKI) and fracture-related infection (FRI) in patients with open fractures.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

We reviewed 358 Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures at our institution from January 2013 to December 2017.

INTERVENTION

Administration of PT (the PT group) or antibiotics other than PT (the historical control group) during the first 48 hours of arrival for open fracture antibiotic prophylaxis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome measurements were rates of inpatient AKI and FRI within six months after definitive fixation.

RESULTS

There were 176 patients in the PT group and 182 patients in the historical control group. The PT group had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists class ( P = 0.004) and injury severity scores ( P < 0.001), a higher average number of debridements before closure/coverage ( P = 0.043), and higher rates of gross soil contamination ( P = 0.049) and staged procedures ( P = 0.008) compared with the historical control group.There was no difference in the rate of AKI between the PT and historical control groups (5.7% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.166) nor when stratified by Gustilo-Anderson fracture classification (type II: 5.8% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.702; type III: 5.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.283). There was no significant difference in the rate of FRI between the PT and historical control groups (23.6% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.469).

CONCLUSION

The use of PT in prophylactic antimicrobial treatment in patients with Gustilo-Anderson type II and III open fractures does not increase the rate of AKI or FRI. We believe PT can be used as an effective monotherapy in these patients without an increased risk of renal injury, but future investigations are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Relationship between piperacillin concentrations, clinical factors and piperacillin/tazobactam-associated acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam, a commonly used antibiotic, is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). The relationship between piperacillin concentrations and AKI remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Estimate piperacillin exposures in critically ill children and young adults administered piperacillin/tazobactam to identify concentrations and clinical factors associated with piperacillin-associated AKI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed piperacillin pharmacokinetics in 107 patients admitted to the paediatric ICU who received at least one dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Piperacillin AUC, highest peak (Cmax) and highest trough (Cmin) in the first 24 hours of therapy were estimated. Piperacillin-associated AKI was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Stage 2/3 AKI present >24 hours after initial piperacillin/tazobactam dose. Likelihood of piperacillin-associated AKI was rated using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify patient and clinical predictors of piperacillin-associated AKI.

RESULTS

Out of 107 patients, 16 (15%) were rated as possibly or probably having piperacillin-associated AKI. Estimated AUC and highest Cmin in the first 24 hours were higher in patients with piperacillin-associated AKI (2042 versus 1445 mg*h/L, P = 0.03; 50.1 versus 10.7 mg/L, P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed predictors of piperacillin-associated AKI included higher Cmin (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.7-23) and age (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

We show a relationship between estimated piperacillin AUC and highest Cmin in the first 24 hours of piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and piperacillin-associated AKI, suggesting total piperacillin exposure early in the course is associated with AKI development. These data could serve as the foundation for implementation of model-informed precision dosing to reduce AKI incidence in patients given piperacillin/tazobactam.

Impact of Respiratory Viral Panel Results on Piperacillin-Tazobactam Use in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

In critically ill patients with acute respiratory infection, antibiotic stewardship can be challenging given the acuity and complexities of such patients, and the associated high mortality. This study determined the impact of respiratory viral panel (RVP) testing on piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) use in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit (MICU).

METHODS

This retrospective chart review used data from adults admitted to a MICU between January 1, 2017, and January 31, 2018, and with findings from at least one RVP available.

FINDINGS

RVP testing was performed on samples from 90 patients admitted to the MICU. RVP was positive in 41% (37/90) of patients, and 53.3% (48/90) received PT during their MICU stay. PT was discontinued in 25.5% (23/90) of patients, 16.2% (6/37) with a positive RVP and 32.1% (17/53) with a negative RVP. Overall mortality was significantly lower in the positive RVP group versus the negative RVP group (odds ratio = 0.28; P = 0.001). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted for acute kidney injury and culture positivity), the risk for PT discontinuation was significantly less in patients with a positive RVP compared to those with a negative RVP (primary outcome). Overall mortality rate and median length of stay were significantly lower in patients with a positive RVP compared to those in patients with a negative RVP (secondary outcomes). The 30-day hospital readmission rate and the risk for AKI were not significantly different between those with positive versus negative RVP.

IMPLICATIONS

Reasons for these observations are currently unclear, but deserve further exploration in future studies. It is hypothesized that the treating providers were concerned about the presence of concurrent bacterial infections along with the diagnosed viral infections given that the patients were critically ill. This suggests that RVP results did not impact PT-prescribing practices in the MICU, and thus that the routine use of RVP solely for guiding antimicrobial-stewardship practices may not be effective.

Piperacillin–Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?

Numerous observational studies and meta-analyses have suggested that combination therapy consisting of piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) augments acute kidney injury (AKI) risk when compared to viable alternatives, such as cefepime–vancomycin (FEP–VAN) and meropenem–VAN. However, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear. One major limitation of the existing studies is the utilization of serum creatinine to quantify AKI since serum creatinine is not a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker to truly define the causal relationship between TZP–VAN exposure and nephrotoxicity. Even so, some preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of AKI when TZP–VAN is preferred. These measures include limiting the administration of TZP–VAN to 72 h, choosing FEP–VAN in place of TZP–VAN in appropriate cases, monitoring the VAN area under the curve level rather than the VAN trough level, avoiding exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and minimizing the prescription of TZP–VAN for patients with a high risk of AKI. More data are needed to comment on the beneficial impact of the extended-infusion regimen of TZP on nephrotoxicity. Additionally, TZP and teicoplanin can be reasonable alternatives to TZP–VAN for the purpose of lowering AKI risk. However, the data are scarce to advocate this practice convincingly.

Comparative Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Concurrent Administration of Vancomycin with Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

The study aims to comparatively assess the nephrotoxicity of vancomycin when combined with piperacillin-tazobactam (V + PT) or meropenem (V + M) in adult patients hospitalized in general wards or intensive care units. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for observational studies evaluating incidences of AKI in adult patients receiving V + PT or V + M for at least 48 h in general wards or intensive care units. The primary outcome was AKI events, while the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality events. The odds ratio (OR), or mean difference for the hospital length of stay, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) from the inverse variance weighting random-effects model were estimated for the risk of AKI, RRT, and mortality. Of the 112 studies identified, twelve observational studies were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 14,511 patients. The odds of having AKI were significantly higher in patients receiving V + PT compared with V + M (OR = 2.31; 95%CI 1.69–3.15). There were no differences between V + PT and V + M in the hospital length of stay, RRT, or mortality outcomes. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant while using V + PT, especially in patients who are at high risk of AKI.

Glomerular Function and Urinary Biomarker Changes between Vancomycin and Vancomycin plus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in a Translational Rat Model

Clinical studies have reported additive nephrotoxicity associated with the combination of vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). This study assessed differences in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary biomarkers between rats receiving VAN and those receiving VAN + TZP. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 26) were randomized to receive 96 h of intravenous VAN at 150 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal TZP at 1,400 mg/kg/day, or VAN + TZP. Kidney function was evaluated using fluorescein-isothiocyanate sinistrin and a transdermal sensor to estimate real-time glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Kidney injury was evaluated via urinary biomarkers, including kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), clusterin, and osteopontin. Compared to a saline control, only rats in the VAN group showed significant declines in GFR by day 4 (-0.39 mL/min/100 g body weight; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.68 to -0.10; P = 0.008). When the VAN + TZP and VAN alone treatment groups were compared, significantly higher urinary KIM-1 marginal linear predictions were observed in the VAN alone group on day 1 (18.4 ng; 95% CI, 1.4 to 35.3; P = 0.03), day 2 (27.4 ng; 95% CI, 10.4 to 44.3; P = 0.002), day 3 (18.8 ng; 95% CI, 1.9 to 35.8; P = 0.03), and day 4 (23.2 ng; 95% CI, 6.3 to 40.2; P = 0.007). KIM-1 was the urinary biomarker that most correlated with decreasing GFR on day 3 (Spearman's rho, -0.45; P = 0.022) and day 4 (Spearman's rho, -0.41; P = 0.036). Kidney function decline and increased KIM-1 were observed among rats that received VAN only but not those that received TZP or VAN + TZP. The addition of TZP to VAN does not worsen kidney function or injury in our translational rat model.

The association of high Vancomycin trough concentration with acute kidney injury during combination therapy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Vancomycin

Background

Co-administration of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) and Vancomycin (VCM) as an antibiotic therapy for severe infectious diseases increases the risk of nephrotoxicity. We retrospectively investigated the utility of monitoring VCM trough concentration in early stage of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) on this combination therapy.

Methods

We enrolled all infectious disease patients who were managed with concurrent PIPC/TAZ and VCM. The record of dosage and the administration interval of each antibiotic and its clinical parameters, as well as the VCM trough concentrations, blood culture for bacteria, and serum creatinine values, were collected. VCM trough concentration was measured during the initial 48–72 h of VCM administration. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated as the degree of AKI.

Results

A total of 47 patients fulfilling the criteria were registered, and AKI developed in 10 patients. There was no statistical difference between the AKI and non-AKI groups with regard to age, height, weight, basal creatinine level, body surface area, body mass index, PIPC/TAZ dose, VCM dose, gender, artificial management, and death within around 30 days. The VCM trough level was increased significantly in the AKI group (mean [standard deviation {SD}]: 25.9 [7.8] μg/mL) compared to that in the non-AKI group (mean [SD]: 15.7 [6.9] μg/mL) (p = 0.003). During the clinical course, renal function returned to normal levels in three out of four AKI stage 2 patients, whereas only partial recovery was achieved in all AKI stage 3 patients.

Conclusions

A high VCM trough concentration may have an influence on the occurrence of AKI during combination therapy of PIPC/TAZ and VCM. Careful monitoring of VCM trough concentration will be required to prevent AKI progression.

Association of antibiotic use and acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to estimate and compare the risk of AKI for various antibiotic combinations in adults hospitalized for CAP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Premier Healthcare Database containing all admissions for 660 US hospitals from 2010 to 2015. We included adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized with CAP and considered 6 different antibiotic combinations based on continuous use in the first 3 hospital days. The primary outcome was incident AKI, defined by ICD-9 codes 584.5-584-9. We evaluated associations of AKI with in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay. We excluded patients who were admitted directly to the intensive care unit, had AKI codes present on admission or had dialysis in the first 2 days. We used generalized linear mixed models with the hospital as a random effect and covariate adjustment for patient demographics, comorbidities, other treatments on day 0/1, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

The total sample included 449,535 patients, 3.15% of whom developed AKI. All other regimens but fluoroquinolones exhibited higher AKI odds than 3rd generation cephalosporin with or without macrolide. The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin with or without other antibiotics was associated with the highest AKI odds (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.73-2.06). Patients with incident AKI had an increased odds of hospital mortality (OR = 6.37; 95% CI: 6.07-6.69) and longer length-of-stay (mean multiplier = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.82, 1.86).

CONCLUSION

Compared to 3rd generation cephalosporin with or without macrolide, piperacillin/tazobactam, vancomycin, and their combination were associated with higher odds of developing AKI, which in turn were associated with worse clinical outcomes.

The concomitant use of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW)

BACKGROUND

Late-onset sepsis is common in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, and it leads to the use of antibiotics to cover resistant organisms, which can be nephrotoxic. Here we have investigated the role of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam on the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, medical records of all ELBW infants who were admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with late onset sepsis who were prescribed vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam were reviewed for demographics, clinical characteristics, use of potential nephrotoxic medications and outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 264 patients were admitted, of whom 28.4%(75/264) received vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam and were matched with 64 controls. There were no differences in gestational age or birth weight between cases and controls [688±160 vs. 689±162 grams (p = 0.99), and 24.7±1.8 vs. 24.7±1.6 weeks (p = 0.99) respectively]. There was no difference in the rate of sepsis between cases and controls [76%(55/72) vs. 64%(41/64) respectively, p = 0.11]. Infants exposed to vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam had a higher percentage of concomitant use of vasopressors and amphotericin. To adjust for confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted with AKI as the dependent variable. Use of vasopressors and vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam were the only risk factors associated with AKI with an adjusted OR (95%CI) of 4.08 (1.90-8.74), p <  0.001; and 2.87 (1.26-6.53), p = 0.01 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam in ELBW infants is associated with an increased risk for AKI.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies

Patients with infection can develop sepsis, and their mortality can be high. An important aspect in the treatment of sepsis is adequate management of the infection.

Intravenous magnesium sulfate for prevention of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam induced acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: An open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) combination. In this study, the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in prevention of VPT induced AKI in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU has been evaluated.

METHODS

In an open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 72 adults (≥ 18 years old) who had indications to receive VPT as empiric therapy were assigned to the magnesium or control group in 1:1 ratio. Concomitant with VPT, intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate was started for patients in the magnesium group. The target serum level of magnesium was defined 3 mg/dl. Patients in the control group received normal saline as placebo. The target serum level of magnesium was defined 1.9 mg/dl in this group. The study's primary outcome was incidence of AKI during and up to 48 h after the treatment course. Escalation and de-escalation of VPT regimen, duration of hospitalization, length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty patients in each group completed the examination. Five patients in the magnesium group and 11 patients in the control group experienced AKI (p = 0.072). De-escalation of VPT regimen was done approximately in 60% of patients. Duration of hospitalization and length of ICU stay were not statistically different between the groups. Finally, 28-day mortality was 23.33% in each group. Although the incidence of AKI was not statistically different between the groups in unadjusted logistic regression model, it became significant after adjusting for confounding factors [unadjusted model (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.10-1.16, p = 0.084), adjusted model: (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.96, p = 0.04)].

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of magnesium sulfate with the target serum levels around 3 mg/dL reduced the incidence of AKI in critically ill patients who were receiving VPT as empric therapy.

Comparative incidence of acute kidney injury in patients on vancomycin therapy in combination with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem

Recent studies have shown that the incidence of nephrotoxicity increases when vancomycin is combined with a beta-lactam antibiotic. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients who received vancomycin with either piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT), cefepime (VC), or meropenem (VM). This was a single center retrospective chart review. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, received 48 hours of combination therapy and antibiotics were started within 24 hours of each other. Exclusion criteria were receiving more than one combination of antibiotics, serum creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, AKI at the time of inclusion, or any form of renal replacement therapy. Two hundred patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 (13%) patients experienced AKI. The incidence of AKI was 21.6%, 9%, and 7.4% in the VPT, VC and VM groups, respectively. A patient who received VPT was 5 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to a patient who received VC (adjusted OR 5.09 95% CI (1.51-17.08), p = 0.008) and 7 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to VM (adjusted OR 7.03 95% CI (1.97-28.08), p = 0.002). This study found a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AKI in patient receiving VPT when compared to VC or VM. This finding supports the need for careful monitoring of renal function in patients receiving VPT therapy and routine evaluation for de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy.

Tolerance and microbiological efficacy of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy of prosthetic joint infection: a propensity-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), leading us to propose cefepime as an alternative since 2017 in our reference centre.

OBJECTIVES

To compare microbiological efficacy and tolerance of these two EAT strategies.

METHODS

All adult patients with PJI empirically treated with vancomycin+cefepime (n = 89) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and matched with vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam-treated historical controls (n = 89) according to a propensity score including age, baseline renal function and concomitant use of other nephrotoxic agents. The two groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and non-parametric tests regarding the proportion of efficacious empirical regimen and the incidence of empirical therapy-related adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Among 146 (82.0%) documented infections, the EAT was considered efficacious in 77 (98.7%) and 65 (98.5%) of the piperacillin/tazobactam- and cefepime-treated patients, respectively (P = 1.000). The rate of AE, particularly AKI, was significantly higher in the vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam group [n = 27 (30.3%) for all AE and 23 (25.8%) for AKI] compared with the vancomycin+cefepime [n = 13 (14.6%) and 6 (6.7%)] group (P = 0.019 and <0.001, respectively), leading to premature EAT discontinuation in 20 (22.5%) and 5 (5.6%) patients (P = 0.002). The two groups were not significantly different regarding their comorbidities, and AKI incidence was not related to vancomycin plasma overexposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from included patients, microbiological efficacy of both strategies was expected to be similar, but vancomycin + cefepime was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI.

Development of the Three Antimicrobial Stewardship E's (TASE) framework and Association between Stewardship Interventions and intended Results (ASIR) analysis to identify key facility-specific interventions and strategies for successful antimicrobial stewardship

BACKGROUND

Successful antimicrobial stewardship (AS) interventions have been described previously. Currently, a uniform operational approach to planning and implementing successful AS interventions does not exist. From 2015 to 2019, concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam use (CVPTU) for >48 hours at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) significantly decreased through AS efforts. We analyzed the interventions that led to this change and created a model to inform future intervention planning and development.

METHODS

VUMC adult admissions from January 2015 to August 2019 were evaluated for CVPTU. Percentage of admissions receiving CVPTU >48 hours, the primary outcome, was evaluated using statistical process control charts. We created the Three Antimicrobial Stewardship E's (TASE) framework and Association between Stewardship Interventions and intended Results (ASIR) analysis to assess potential intensity and impact of interventions associated with successful change during this time period and to identify guiding principles for development of future initiatives.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of admissions receiving CVPTU per month declined from 4.2% to 0.7%. Over 8 time periods, we identified 4 high, 3 moderate and 1 low intervention intensity periods. Continuous provider-level AS education was present throughout. Creation and dissemination of division and department algorithms and reinforcement via computerized provider order entry sets preceded the largest reduction in CVPTU and sustained prescribing practice changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The TASE framework and ASIR analysis successfully identified pivotal interventions and strategies needed to effect and sustain change at VUMC. Further research is needed to validate its effectiveness as a stewardship intervention planning tool at our institution and others.

Comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for the risk of acute kidney injury

We compared the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), 7-day and 30-day mortalities, and resolution of AKI at discharge in combination therapies involving either teicoplanin (TEI) or vancomycin (VAN) with piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) or meropenem (MER). In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, adult patients (>18 years) who had a baseline serum creatinine level within 24 h of admission and who received study antibiotics for at least 48 h were included. The primary outcome was AKI incidence after therapy per RIFLE criteria. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score match analyses were employed for statistical comparisons. Data from 379 patients were evaluated. In multivariate analysis (MVA) of the whole cohort, TZP-VAN combination was associated with significantly higher rate of AKI as compared with TZP-TEI (aOR: 3.21, 95% CI, 1.36-7.57; p = 0.008) or with MER-VAN (aOR: 2.28, 95% CI, 1.008-5.18; p = 0.048). In MVA of the matched cohorts, TZP-VAN as compared with TZP-TEI and MER-VAN was associated with 3.96 times (95% CI, 1.48-10.63, p = 0.006) and 3.11 times (95% CI, 1.12-8.62; p = 0.028) increased risk of AKI, respectively. No differences between MER-TEI and MER-VAN combinations were detected. Seven-day and 30-day mortalities and resolution rates of AKI were similar in all comparisons. Teicoplanin can be preferred instead of VAN when combination with TZP is used particularly for patients with high AKI risk.

Nephrotoxicity from Vancomycin Combined with Piperacillin-Tazobactam: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have identified the combination of vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) to be associated with increased nephrotoxicity. Multiple, large cohort studies have found this widely used combination to have a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than other regimens in a variety of populations.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the epidemiology and clinical features of VPT-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are also discussed. Key Message: VPT-associated nephrotoxicity is a recently recognized clinical entity. Clinical strategies to minimize the risk of toxicity in this setting include antimicrobial stewardship, monitoring of kidney function, and emerging data supporting the potential role for novel biomarkers in predicting and managing AKI.

Risk of acute kidney injury and Clostridioides difficile infection with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime and meropenem with or without vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Empiric antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-acquired infections often includes vancomycin plus an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (AP-BL). These agents vary in risk for adverse events, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Studies have only examined these risks separately; thus, our objective was to simultaneously evaluate AKI and CDI risks with AP-BL in the same patient cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 789,200 Veterans Health Administration medical admissions from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2016. The antimicrobials examined were vancomycin, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to contrast risks for AKI and CDI across individual target antimicrobials and vancomycin combination therapies, including adjustment for known confounders.

RESULTS

With respect to the base rate of AKI among patients who did not receive a target antibiotic (4.6%), the adjusted hazards ratios for piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, and meropenem were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.43-1.54), 1.00 (0.95-1.05), 0.92 (0.83-1.01), respectively. Co-administration of vancomycin increased AKI rates (data not shown). Similarly, against the base rate of CDI (0.7%), these ratios were 1.21 (1.07-1.36), 1.89 (1.62-2.20), and 1.99 (1.55-2.56), respectively. Addition of vancomycin had minimal impact on CDI rates (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

Piperacillin/tazobactam increased AKI risk, which was exacerbated by concurrent vancomycin. Cefepime and meropenem increased CDI risk relative to piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians should consider the risks and benefits of AP-BL when selecting empiric regimens. Further well-designed studies evaluating the global risks of AP-BL and patient specific characteristics that can guide empiric selection are needed.

Evaluation of the risk of acute kidney injury with the use of piperacillin/tazobactam among adult critically ill patients

PURPOSE

Piperacillin/tazobactam (PT), when combined with vancomycin, is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is not known whether PT alone is associated with a higher incidence of AKI compared to other β-lactams among critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of AKI associated with the use of PT to other β-lactams among adult critically ill patients METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in the surgical and the medical intensive care units at two hospitals within Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) in Qatar and included adult critically ill patients who received at least one dose of anti-pseudomonal β-lactams. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury, defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Multiple logistic regression with adjustment for pre-specified potential confounders was used for the primary outcome analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 669 patients were included in the analysis: 507 patients in the PT group and 162 patients in the control (meropenem/cefepime) group. AKI occurred in 136 (26.8%) members of the PT group and 38 (23.5%) members of the control group [odds ratio (OR) 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.8]. The results were not significantly altered after adjusting for the pre-specified potential confounders (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.88-2.15).

CONCLUSION

In this study, PT was not associated with a higher risk of AKI compared to cefepime or meropenem among adult critically ill patients.

Vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam and acute kidney injury risk: A review of the literature

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury is a devastating consequence observed with antibiotic therapy. The objective of this review was to summarize available data regarding the rates of acute kidney injury with vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam compared to other beta-lactam combinations.

METHODS

A PubMed search from 2011 to May 2020 was conducted using the following search terms: vancomycin AND piperacillin/tazobactam AND acute kidney injury. Additional references were identified from a review of citations. Articles evaluating exclusively paediatric patients and articles evaluating vancomycin monotherapy as the comparator group were excluded. Case reports and case series were also excluded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were 18 studies included. Ten studies adjusted for potential confounders of acute kidney injury. Fourteen retrospective studies, one prospective study and three meta-analyses found the combination of vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam to be associated with a higher rate of acute kidney injury than the comparator group(s).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Although there are data to support that the combination of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of acute kidney, much of the data come from small retrospective studies with variable adjustment for confounders. Furthermore, study heterogeneity on inclusion criteria and evaluation of long-term outcomes should be cautiously interpreted. Finally, additional data suggest that the risk of acute kidney injury seems to be minimized with shorter courses of therapy. Without prospective studies available, antimicrobial stewardship efforts should continue to target reducing broad-spectrum regimens, often limiting the need for long-term vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam combination.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Critically Ill Patients With Brief Empiric Use of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams With Vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxins contribute to 20%-40% of acute kidney injury (AKI) cases in the intensive care unit (ICU). The combination of piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and vancomycin (VAN) has been identified as nephrotoxic, but existing studies focus on extended durations of therapy rather than the brief empiric courses often used in the ICU. The current study was performed to compare the risk of AKI with a short course of PTZ/VAN to with the risk associated with other antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combinations.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective cohort of 3299 ICU patients who received ≥24 but ≤72 hours of an antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combination: PTZ/VAN, cefepime (CEF)/VAN, or meropenem (MER)/VAN. The risk of developing stage 2 or 3 AKI was compared between antibiotic groups with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for relevant confounders. We also compared the risk of persistent kidney dysfunction, dialysis dependence, or death at 60 days between groups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of stage 2 or 3 AKI was 9%. Brief exposure to PTZ/VAN did not confer a greater risk of stage 2 or 3 AKI after adjustment for relevant confounders (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for PTZ/VAN vs CEF/VAN, 1.11 [.85-1.45]; PTZ/VAN vs MER/VAN, 1.04 [.71-1.42]). No significant differences were noted between groups at 60-day follow-up in the outcomes of persistent kidney dysfunction (P = .08), new dialysis dependence (P = .15), or death (P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Short courses of PTZ/VAN were not associated with a greater risk of short- or 60-day adverse renal outcomes than other empiric broad-spectrum combinations.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Combat-Injured Patients Associated With Concomitant Vancomycin and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotic Use

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant infections complicating combat-related trauma necessitate the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Recent literature posits an association between vancomycin (VANC) and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) combination therapy and acute kidney injury (AKI). We examined whether therapy with VPT was associated with an increased risk of AKI compared to VANC and other broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics (VBL) following combat-related injuries.

METHODS

Patients within the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) who received ≥48 hours concomitant VPT or VBL started within 24 hours of each other were assessed. Exclusion criteria were receipt of renal replacement therapy and baseline creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. Acute kidney injury was defined by meeting any of the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage Renal Disease (RIFLE), AKIN, or VANC consensus guidelines criteria 3 to 7 days after therapy initiation. Variables significantly associated with AKI were used in inverse probability treatment weighting to perform univariate and subsequent logistic regression multivariate modeling to determine significant risk factors for AKI.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients who received VPT and 207 who received VBL were included. Both groups had a median age of 24 years and initial median creatinine of 0.7 mg/dL. The VBL patients were more likely to have sustained blast injuries (P = .001) and received nephrotoxic agents (amphotericin [P = .002] and aminoglycosides [P < .001]). In the VBL group, AKI incidence was 9.7% compared to 13.1% in the VPT group (P = .438). Multivariate analysis identified a relative risk of 1.727 (95% CI: 1.027-2.765) for AKI associated with VPT exposure. Acute kidney injury severity generally met RIFLE Risk criteria and was 1 day in duration. Only 1 patient had persistent renal dysfunction 30 days after therapy completion.

CONCLUSION

In this young and previously healthy, severely ill combat-injured population, VPT was associated with nearly twice the risk of AKI compared to VBL. Nevertheless, AKI was of low severity, short duration, and had high rates of renal recovery.

[Combinatorial Vancomycin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam Results in Elevated Vancomycin Trough Concentration and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report]

In the hospital, antibiotics are widely used to treat infections. We report a case of acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by an antibiotic drug combination. A 30-year-old Japanese male presented with lung metastases, pneumothorax, empyema, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The patient received a combination of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam, which resulted in elevated vancomycin trough concentration and subsequently in AKI. Renal function was restored upon vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam cessation. Though this patient had AKI most likely due to the combined use of two agents as has been reported in many cases, vancomycin trough concentration showed an unexpected abnormal increase when halting vancomycin treatment. This is the first report indicating a drug-drug interaction between vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam with unexpected abnormal vancomycin trough concentration, leading to AKI, additionally we think that there was a situation that he stressed against the kidney by a history of medications caused renal dysfunction and co-administration. We suggest that when using vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam, the trough concentration of vancomycin must be confirmed simultaneously with renal function and evaluation, and that the combination of these two drugs should be minimized.

An acute kidney injury prediction nomogram based on neurosurgical intensive care unit profiles

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious complication with high mortality within the neural-critical care unit, and can limit the treatment of osmotic diuresis and body fluid equilibrium. Given its seriousness, it is necessary to find a tool to predict the likelihood of AKI and to prevent its occurrence.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients’ clinical profiles, laboratory test results, and doctors’ prescriptions were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select variables, and a logistic regression model was then applied to find independent risk factors for AKI. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, we established a nomogram to evaluate the probability of AKI, which was verified through the use of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and its calibration curves.

Results

Risk factors given by logistic regression were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) classification (1.593; 95% CI: 0.995–2.549; P=0.0523), coefficient of variation (CV) of GCS (1.017; 95% CI: 0.995–1.04; P=0.1367), hypertension (2.238; 95% CI: 1.124–4.456; P=0.0219), coronary heart disease (2.924; 95% CI: 1.2–7.126; P=0.0182), pneumonia within 7 days (3.032; 95% CI: 1.511–6.085; P=0.0018), heart failure within 7 days (6.589; 95% CI: 2.235–19.42; P=0.0006), furosemide (1.011; 95% CI: 1.005–1.016; P<0.0001), torasemide (1.028; 95% CI: 0.976–1.082; P=0.297), dopamine (1; 95% CI: 1–1.001, P=0.3297), and norepinephrine (1.007; 95% CI: 1–1.015; P=0.0474). The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.8786, and the calibration curves showed that the model had a good ability to predict AKI occurrence.

Conclusions

This study presents an AKI prediction nomogram based on LASSO, logistic regression, and clinical risk factors. The clinical use of the nomogram may allow for the timely detection of AKI occurrence and thus improve the prognosis of patients.

Impact of total body weight on rate of acute kidney injury in patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin

PURPOSE

Results of a study to determine whether obesity is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients receiving combination therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients who received combination therapy for at least 48 hours was conducted using data from the University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science's Enterprise Data Trust. Patients with chronic kidney disease, baseline creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min, cystic fibrosis, or missing height or weight information were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 8,125 patients were included in the cohort. Among the variables evaluated, total body weight of 91 kg or more was the variable most predictive of AKI. Patients with a weight of 91 kg or higher were more likely than lower-weight patients to have diabetes (39% versus 21%, p < 0.00001), hypertension (64% versus 47%, p < 0.00001), and heart failure (15% versus 13%, p = 0.007). The median daily vancomcyin dose was lower in patients with a weight of less than 91 kg (2,000 mg versus 3,000 mg, p < 0.00001); however, weight-based doses were lower in patients weighing 91 kg or more (25.5 mg/kg/day versus 27.9 mg/kg/day, p < 0.00001). AKI was more common in patients weighing 91 kg or more (24% versus 18%, p < 0.00001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.66]).

CONCLUSION

Increased total body weight increased the rate of AKI among patients concurrently treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin independent of clinically important confounders, with an important breakpoint occurring at 91 kg.

Effect of concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam on frequency of acute kidney injury in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Results of a study of rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients treated with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or vancomycin plus alternative antipseudomonal β-lactams (APBLs) are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Pediatric patients were included in the study cohort if they received combination therapy for at least 48 hours, had documented baseline and follow-up serum creatinine levels, and had a documented serum vancomycin trough concentration. The primary outcome was the frequency of AKI, defined as a 50% or greater increase in serum creatinine concentration from baseline or an increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL from baseline. The secondary outcome was time to AKI onset.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients were included. Among 100 patients who received vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam, the rate of AKI was higher than the rate in the group treated with vancomycin plus alternative APBLs (27% versus 7%, p < 0.0001). The median time to AKI onset was shorter in the piperacillin-tazobactam group versus the alternative APBL group (3.8 versus 7.9 days, p = 0.0065). Patients who were administered piperacillin-tazobactam were almost 6 times as likely to develop AKI (odds ratio [OR], 5.955; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.774-12.784), and patients who had a maximum vancomycin trough concentration greater than 20 mg/L were 7.5 times as likely to develop AKI (OR, 7.552; 95% CI, 3.625-15.734).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients treated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam had a higher rate of AKI, with faster AKI onset, than those who received vancomycin in combination with other APBLs.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Added to Vancomycin Increases Risk for Acute Kidney Injury: Fact or Fiction?

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam are 2 of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in hospitals. Recent data from multiple meta-analyses suggest that the combination increases the risk for vancomycin-induced kidney injury when compared to alternative viable options. However, these studies are unable to prove biologic plausibility and causality as randomized controlled trials have not been performed. Furthermore, these studies define acute kidney injury according to thresholds of serum creatinine rise. Serum creatinine is not a direct indicator of renal injury, rather a surrogate of glomerular function. More reliable, specific, and sensitive biomarkers are needed to truly define if there is a causal relationship with increased toxicity when piperacillin-tazobactam is added to vancomycin. This viewpoint will explore the available evidence for and against increased acute kidney injury in the setting of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam coadministration.

The association of acute kidney injury with the concomitant use of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Concomitant use of vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) has been associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized adults. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and EMBASE for pediatric studies examining this hypothesis, with reference to vancomycin monotherapy or in combination with another beta-lactam antibiotic. Out of 1381 non-duplicate studies, 10 met our inclusion criteria. We performed a random effects meta-analysis, based on crude odds ratios, and we accounted for both quality of included studies and publication bias. In primary analysis, concomitant vancomycin and TZP use yielded a statistically significant association with the development of AKI. More specifically, children with AKI had higher odds to have been exposed to vancomycin plus TZP, in comparison with vancomycin monotherapy (OR 8.15; 95% CI: 3.49-18.99), or vancomycin plus any other beta-lactam antibiotic (OR 3.48; 95% CI: 2.71-4.46). Based on the results of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale quality assessment, a secondary analysis including only higher quality studies (6 out of 10 studies) yielded again higher odds of exposure to vancomycin plus TZP, compared to vancomycin plus another beta-lactam antibiotic (OR 3.76; 95% CI: 2.56-5.51). Notably, even after controlling for possible publication bias our results remained statistically significant (OR 3.09; 95% CI: 2.30-4.14). In conclusion, the concomitant use of vancomycin and TZP could be associated with AKI development and the clinical significance of this potential association needs to be studied further in the pediatric population.

Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Antibiotic-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children

BACKGROUND

There continues to be uncertainty about whether piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) increases the risk of AKI in critically ill pediatric patients. We sought to compare rates of AKI among critically ill children treated with TZP or cefepime, an alternative frequently used in intensive care units, with and without vancomycin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study assessing the risk of AKI in pediatric intensive care unit patients after exposure to vancomycin, TZP, and cefepime, alone or in combination, within 48 hours of admission. The primary outcome was development of stage 2 or 3 AKI or an increase in AKI stage from 2 to 3 within the 6 days after the 48-hour exposure window. Secondary outcomes included lengths of stay, need for RRT, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 5686 patients included, 494 (8.7%) developed stage 2 or 3 AKI. The adjusted odds of developing AKI after medication exposure were 1.56 for TZP (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.99), 1.13 for cefepime (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.64), and 0.86 for vancomycin (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.07). The adjusted odds of developing AKI for vancomycin plus TZP versus vancomycin plus cefepime was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.85 to 2.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Observational data in critically ill children show that TZP use is associated with increased odds of AKI. A weaker, nonsignificant association between vancomycin plus TZP and AKI compared with vancomycin plus cefepime, creates some uncertainty about the nature of the association between TZP and AKI. However, cefepime is an alternative not associated with AKI.

Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in Children: a Reappraisal of Vancomycin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last 50 years, vancomycin has been the agent of choice to treat infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, vancomycin treatment failure is not uncommon, even when MRSA strains are fully susceptible to vancomycin. Treatment with vancomycin requires careful monitoring of drug levels as there is a potential for nephrotoxicity. Resistance to clindamycin is not infrequent, which also limits therapeutic options for treating infections due to MRSA in children. This paper reviews the current data on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of vancomycin in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Resistance to vancomycin in MRSA (MIC >2 mg/L) is infrequent; there is increasing evidence in the literature that vancomycin maybe ineffective against increasing proportion of isolates with MICs between 1 and 2 mg/L. Recent studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated that strains with high vancomycin MICs are associated with poor outcomes especially in patients with bacteremia and deep tissue infections due to MRSA. This gradual increase in vancomycin MIC has been reported as MIC creep or vancomycin heteroresistance. Patients infected with MRSA isolates that exhibit MIC creep experience poorer clinical outcomes, including delayed treatment response, increased mortality, increase rate of relapse, and extended hospitalization. There are limited data to guide vancomycin dosing in children with MRSA. Although the vancomycin area under the curve AUC₂₄/MIC ratio > 400 has been shown to predict clinical efficacy in adults, this relationship has not been documented very well for treatment outcomes in MRSA infections in children. Use of higher vancomycin dosages in attempts to achieve higher trough concentrations has been associated with increased nephrotoxicity. New recently approved antibiotics including ceftaroline, dalbavancin, and tedizolid offer a number of advantages over vancomycin to treat staphylococcal infections: improved antimicrobial activity, superior pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and dosing, including once-daily and weekly regimens, and less need for monitoring drug levels.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Cefepime, or Meropenem

Critically ill patients are frequently treated with empirical antibiotic therapy, including vancomycin and β-lactams. Recent evidence suggests an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who received a combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) compared with patients who received vancomycin alone or vancomycin in combination with cefepime (VC) or meropenem (VM), but most studies were conducted predominately in the non-critically ill population. A retrospective cohort study that included 2,492 patients was conducted in the intensive care units of a large university hospital with the primary outcome being the development of any AKI. The rates of any AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, were 39.3% for VPT patients, 24.2% for VC patients, and 23.5% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Similarly, the incidences of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI were also significantly higher for VPT patients than for the patients in the other groups. The rates of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI, respectively, were 15% and 6.6% for VPT patients, 5.8% and 1.8% for VC patients, and 6.6% and 1.3% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In multivariate analysis, the use of vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam was found to be an independent predictor of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 2.161; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.620 to 2.883). In conclusion, critically ill patients receiving the combination of VPT had the highest incidence of AKI compared to critically ill patients receiving either VC or VM.

The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin With Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among critically ill patients receiving combination therapy with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) against patients receiving vancomycin plus cefepime (VC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit between September 2012 and December 2016 was conducted. Patients were included if they received combination therapy with VPT or VC for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if creatinine clearance was <60 mL/min or received renal replacement therapy prior to the initiation of therapy. The primary end point was AKI, as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification, during or within 48 hours of completion of therapy. The incidence of AKI was compared between groups and multivariate analysis was performed to control for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients received either VPT (n = 258) or VC (n = 136). There were no differences in baseline serum creatinine (0.8 [0.3]mg/dL vs 0.7 [0.3] mg/dL, P = 0.207), use of vasopressors (44% vs 38%, P = 0.255), mechanical ventilation (45% vs 40%, P = 0.350), or initial vancomycin trough (11.2 [5] mg/L vs 11 [4.8] mg/L, P = 0.668) between VPT and VC groups, respectively. The incidence of AKI was 28.7% for VPT patients versus 21.3% for VC patients (P = 0.114). Multivariate analysis revealed vancomycin trough >20 mg/L (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 2.69 [1.62-4.47]), baseline SCr (OR [95% CI] = 3.34 [1.43-7.80]), vasopressors (OR [95% CI] = 1.77 [1.04-3.04]), and duration of combination therapy (OR [95% CI] = 1.009 [1.003-1.015]) as independent risk factors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

The risk of AKI was similar between VPT and VC groups in critically ill patients. Risk factors for AKI were related to baseline renal function, duration of combination therapy, supratherapeutic vancomycin troughs, and severity of illness.

Supratherapeutic Vancomycin Concentrations Associated With Hypothermia in a Burn Patient

Hypothermia is a dangerous adverse effect that occurs in burn patients. Hypothermia leads to decreased renal blood flow and may decrease renal clearance of medications. Few human studies examine the effect of hypothermia on drug clearance and no known studies examine its effect on vancomycin clearance in burn patients. This case report describes a 39-year-old female who suffered 60% total body surface area third-degree burns. The patient required vancomycin, empirically, and for definitive treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. During three of the vancomycin courses, the patient experienced significant hypothermia. Vancomycin concentrations obtained during normothermia were found to be subtherapeutic or therapeutic. Concentrations obtained during hypothermia were found to be supratherapeutic and rate elimination constants were found to be significantly decreased by 45, 25, and 31%, respectively. These patient data suggest that hypothermia can decrease vancomycin clearance in burn patients as evidenced by supratherapeutic vancomycin concentrations and decreased rate elimination constants. Burn patients should be monitored closely for hypothermia. If hypothermia occurs during treatment, vancomycin concentrations should be obtained frequently, even if renal function appears stable. Dosing based on concentrations may be necessary in order to avoid supratherapeutic vancomycin concentrations and associated adverse drug events.

Prospective Cohort Study of the Tolerability of Prosthetic Joint Infection Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy

The empirical use of vancomycin in combination with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is currently recommended after the initial surgery of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the tolerability of such high-dose intravenous regimens is poorly known. Adult patients receiving an empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for a PJI were enrolled in a prospective cohort study (2011 to 2016). EAT-related adverse events (AE) were described according to the common terminology criteria for AE (CTCAE), and their determinants were assessed by logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. The EAT of the 333 included patients (median age, 69.8 years; interquartile range [IQR], 59.3 to 79.1 years) mostly relies on vancomycin (n = 229, 68.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 131, 39.3%), and/or third-generation cephalosporins (n = 50, 15%). Forty-two patients (12.6%) experienced an EAT-related AE. Ten (20.4%) AE were severe (CTCAE grade ≥ 3). The use of vancomycin (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 2.1 to 22.9), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 3.7; 95%CI, 1.8 to 7.2), or the combination of both (OR, 4.1; 95%CI, 2.1 to 8.2) were the only AE predictors. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common AE (n = 25; 51.0% of AE) and was also associated with the use of the vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam combination (OR, 6.7; 95%CI, 2.6 to 17.3). A vancomycin plasma overexposure was noted in nine (37.5%) of the vancomycin-related AKIs only. Other vancomycin-based therapies were significantly less at risk for AE and AKI. The EAT of PJI is associated with an important rate of AE, linked with the use of the vancomycin and the piperacillin-tazobactam combination. These results corroborate recent findings suggesting a synergic toxicity of these drugs in comparison to vancomycin-cefepime, which remains to be evaluated in PJI. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03010293.).

Comparative incidence and excess risk of acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients receiving vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in combination or as monotherapy

Combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) has been associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with monotherapy with either agent. This retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted to assess the comparative incidence of AKI due to combination therapy in patients receiving vancomycin and TZP in combination or as monotherapy. Patients aged ≥18 years admitted to Albany Medical Center (Albany, NY) between September 2013 and August 2014 who had received therapy for at least two consecutive days were included. Patients who were pregnant, neutropenic, had AKI on admission or with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Patients were matched on baseline risk of AKI. The main outcome of interest was AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/L or ≥50% within 48 h. Secondary outcomes evaluated were length of hospital and ICU stay and inpatient mortality associated with AKI. The risk of AKI was 7.0%, 8.5% and 26.8% in the vancomycin monotherapy, TZP monotherapy and combination groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, combination therapy was independently associated with an increased odds of AKI (adjusted odds ratio = 4.406, 95% confidence interval 1.472-13.188) compared with vancomycin monotherapy. The excess risk of combination therapy was 11.3%. In this matched cohort study, there was an increased incidence of AKI in patients receiving vancomycin and TZP combination therapy. Further research is needed to determine the individual strategies to best prevent inpatient AKI in patients receiving this combination therapy.

Drug-induced kidney disease in the ICU: mechanisms, susceptibility, diagnosis and management strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in the critically ill population, is multifactorial and associated with increased mortality. Drug-induced kidney injury is a significant contributor to the development of AKI. The purpose of this review is to provide updates in the epidemiology, susceptibility and management of drug-induced kidney disease (DIKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent changes in guidelines for the management of serious infections in the critically ill have resulted in an increased frequency of DIKD. Varying definitions employed in clinical trials has complicated the awareness of this adverse event. Causality assessment is often missing from studies as it is complicated by the need to evaluate competing AKI risk factors. This has led to uncertainty in the nephrotoxic risk of commonly used drugs.

SUMMARY

Standard criteria for DIKD should be applied in clinical trials to improve our understanding of the frequency of these events. Adjudication of these events will improve the clinician's ability to evaluate the causal relationship and relative contribution of specific drugs to the AKI event.

Microbiologic epidemiology depending on time to occurrence of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The high microbiologic diversity encountered in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) makes the choice of empirical antimicrobial therapies challenging, especially in cases of implant retention or one-stage exchange. Despite the risk of dysbiosis and toxicity, the combination of vancomycin with a broad-spectrum β-lactam is currently recommended in all cases, even if Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) might be less represented in late PJI. In this context, this study aimed to describe the microbiologic epidemiology of PJI according to the chronology of infection.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study (2011-2016) evaluated the microbiologic aetiology of 567 PJI according to time of occurrence from prosthesis implantation-early (<3 months), delayed (3-12 months) and late (>12 months)-as well as mechanism of acquisition.

RESULTS

Initial microbiologic documentation (n = 511; 90.1%) disclosed 164 (28.9%) Staphylococcus aureus (including 26 (16.1%) methicillin-resistant S. aureus), 162 (28.6%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (including 81 (59.1%) methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci), 80 (14.1%) Enterobacteriaceae, 74 (13.1%) streptococci and 60 (10.6%) Cutibacterium acnes. Considering nonhaematogenous late PJI (n = 182), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 7; 3.8%) were less represented than in the first year after implantation (n = 56; 17.2%; p <0.001), without difference regarding nonfermenting GNB (4.6% and 2.7%, respectively). The prevalence of anaerobes (n = 40; 21.9%; including 32 (80.0%) C. acnes) was higher in late PJI (p <0.001). Consequently, a broad-spectrum β-lactam might be useful in 12 patients (6.6%) with late PJI only compared to 66 patients (20.3%) with early/delayed PJI (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the minority amount of GNB in late postoperative PJI, the empirical use of a broad-spectrum β-lactam should be reconsidered, especially when a two-stage exchange is planned.