Montelukast administered in the morning or evening to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

Exploration of Parteck® SRP 80 and Hypromellose for Chronomodulated Release of LTD4 Receptor Antagonist and Statistical Optimization Using Central Composite Design

To manage early morning symptoms of nocturnal bronchial asthma, a chronotherapeutic drug delivery system (ChrDDS) of montelukast sodium was designed and developed utilizing non-saccharide, fully synthetic Parteck® SRP 80, and hydrophilic cellulose derivative hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Recurrent lag phase, each followed by the release of a fraction of the drug dose, can be achieved by formulating a "tablets in a capsule" system containing more than one compressed coated tablet encapsulated in an enteric-coated capsule. Lag time in this study was controlled by the compressed coating of HPMC K4M and a blend of ethyl cellulose and Carbopol polymer. Assembly of the system includes two compressed coated tablets encapsulated in a capsule which was further proceeded for enteric coating in a conventional, a novel wax-based, and a Eudracap™ enteric-coated capsule. The optimized formulation of directly compressed tablets of Parteck ® SRP 80 showed a hardness of 8.8 kg/cm² which is 1.25-fold higher than wet granulated tablets of HPMC. In vitro release data of matrix tablets of Parteck® SRP 80 demonstrated controlled release of drug for a duration of up to 10.8-11 h with changing ratio of polymer and filler. Eudracap™ capsule showed a minimum acid uptake value of 1.75%. The current approach can open a path for the time-regulated release of montelukast that may be beneficial for individuals with episodes of asthma attacks mostly in the early morning.

Circadian Variation in Efficacy of Medications

Although much has been learned about circadian clocks and rhythms over the past few decades, translation of this foundational science underlying the temporal regulation of physiology and behavior to clinical applications has been slow. Indeed, acceptance of the modern study of circadian rhythms has been blunted because the phenomenology of cyclic changes had to counteract the 20th century dogma of homeostasis in the biological sciences and medicine. We are providing this review of clinical data to highlight the emerging awareness of circadian variation in efficacy of medications for physicians, clinicians, and pharmacists. We are suggesting that gold-standard double-blind clinical studies should be conducted to determine the best time of day for optimal effectiveness of medications; also, we suggest that time of day should be tracked and reported as an important biological variable in ongoing clinical studies hereafter. Furthermore, we emphasize that time of day is, and should be considered, a key biological variable in research design similar to sex. In common with biomedical research data that have been historically strongly skewed toward the male sex, most pharmaceutical data have been skewed toward morning dosing without strong evidence that this is the optimal time of efficacy.

Circadian rhythms and medical diseases: does it matter when drugs are taken?

BACKGROUND

Chronobiology is devoted to the study of biological rhythms. It is possible that a given medication may be therapeutic and safe when administered at some time, but subtherapeutic or poorly tolerated at another.

METHODS

We focused on some classes of drugs, widely used by the internists, performing a PubMed search with the single drugs associated with the MeSH terms "Chronotherapy", "Circadian rhythm", and "Chronobiology, phenomena". Among the studies found, we considered only those provided with discrete numerosity or clearly stated methodological characteristics.

RESULTS

The results of available studies were given, along with a series of short take-home messages at the end of each mini-chapter devoted to: antihypertensives, statins, anticoagulants, analgesics, drugs for acid-related disorders, and anti-asthmatic drugs. In particular, evidence of morning vs. evening administration, when applicable, was given for each medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate evidence seems to support that at least ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, simvastatin, corticosteroids (slow-release formulation) for arthritic patients, and ranitidine should preferably be administered in the evening. Morning dosing could be better for proton pump inhibitors, whereas time of administration is not crucial for asthma inhalation drugs. Studies are available for other drugs, but not so strong enough to draw definite conclusions. For now, we need prospective intervention trials specifically designed to investigate the long-term effects of a temporal approach to medical therapy. However, since switching to morning-evening administration or vice versa is simple and inexpensive, in some cases it could be considered, remembering that, in any case, adherence remains the crucial point.

Impact of montelukast on asthma associated with rhinitis, and other triggers and co-morbidities

INTRODUCTION

Rhinitis and other specific triggers or co-morbidities (tobacco exposure, excess weight, aspirin sensitivity or heredity factors) are frequently associated with uncontrolled asthma. Asthma associated with these exacerbating factors appears to be related to an increase in leukotriene-mediated inflammation.

METHODS

We reviewed the role of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in the treatment of asthma associated with these factors by using the PubMed database to search the English and French biomedical literature for articles describing randomized-controlled trials, large observational studies and reviews (published up to May 2012, inclusive).

RESULTS

Montelukast, either alone or in combination with other drugs, is an effective treatment against rhinitis-associated asthma. Montelukast also offers therapeutic benefits against exercise-induced asthma or in cases of asthma linked to tobacco exposure, excess weight or aspirin hypersensitivity. Thus, for some patients, montelukast may constitute an alternative to the gold-standard treatment of inhaled corticosteroids. Polymorphisms in several genes encoding proteins of the leukotriene signaling pathway may contribute to the variability in response to montelukast.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we have shown that montelukast treatment could be of particular benefit to subgroups of patients with asthma associated with rhinitis, exercise, tobacco exposure, being overweight or aspirin hypersensitivity.

Pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma: allowing normal levels of activity and sport

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is experienced by the majority of an estimated 300 million individuals who have asthma, a condition that affects all ages and is increasing globally. Respiratory water loss with dehydration of the airways causing mediator release and airway narrowing is considered the cause of EIB, the severity of which will be increased if the inhaled air is cold or polluted. Adequate control of asthma is essential to minimize or prevent EIB and permit normal levels of physical activity and sport. This is important because exercise is a necessary component of daily living, assists in obtaining and maintaining a healthy body and has been demonstrated to benefit asthmatics. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids and inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (IβA) are the pharmacological agents of choice to manage asthma and minimize EIB, assisted when necessary, by other drugs including leukotriene receptor antagonists and chromones. Tolerance from daily use of IβA is of concern and more flexible drug therapy needs to be considered. Optimal use of inhalers to deliver drugs effectively requires closer attention. Pharmacogenetics may hold the key to future drug therapy.

Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in the management of pediatric asthma: an update

At present, the main indications for leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) in pediatric asthma are as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and as initial controller therapy in children with mild asthma, especially those who cannot or will not use ICS. LTRA are also useful for patients who have concomitant rhinitis, and patients with viral-induced wheeze and exercise-induced asthma. It should be noted that the benefits of LTRA therapy have been demonstrated in children as young as 6 months of age and recent clinical trials have further proven the benefits of LTRA in acute asthma exacerbations. However, considering the important pro-inflammatory effects that leukotrienes (LT) have in experimental models of asthma, it may seem surprising that LTRA treatment outcomes are not better and that in some clinical trials only a minority of patients could be classified as full responders. This could be explained by potential additional LT receptors that are not affected by LTRA. Such receptors could represent new therapeutic targets in asthma. Furthermore, progress in differentiating between asthma phenotypes that result from different pathogenic mechanisms, some of which may involve LT to a lesser degree, should lead to an improved, personalized use of LTRA for treating asthma.

Chronotherapeutics--a chronopharmaceutical approach to drug delivery in the treatment of asthma

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways associated with airflow obstruction that is reversible spontaneously or with treatment. Bronchial asthma is a disease based on established circadian rhythm. The symptoms of asthma worsen during midnight to early morning and therefore it is required to deliver the drug in such fashion that effective treatment can be obtained during the time of asthma attacks. Chronotherapy is an approach that fulfills the criteria of drug delivery at a specific time as per the pathophysiological need of the disease, to improve patient compliance. The current article focuses on the chronotherapy of bronchial asthma, methodologies involved for the existing systems, recent updates and different chronopharmaceutical technologies currently available in the market. Chronotherapy with different categories of bronchial asthma medications also has been reviewed.

Montelukast in childhood asthma: what is the evidence for its use?

Asthma is a complex process involving extensive infiltration of the airway mucosa and lumen by activated inflammatory cells and release of mediators that result in airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Leukotrienes are mediators believed to play a major role in this process. At present, inhaled corticosteroids are the cornerstone of asthma management. However, asthma control may remain suboptimal and there is well-documented concern regarding adverse events with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in children. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, provide a safe and effective treatment option with ease of administration, particularly in preschool children and as add-on therapy in patients with difficult-to-control asthma.

Exercise increases exhaled breath condensate cysteinyl leukotriene concentration in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Although the importance of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is supported by various sources of evidence, how the concentration of these mediators change during the development of EIB has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to determine the effect of exercise on the concentration of airway Cys-LT in asthmatic patients by measuring Cys-LT in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

Seventeen atopic asthmatic patients with a previous history of EIB and six healthy volunteers were studied. Before and two times within 10 minutes after exercise challenge, FEV₁ was measured and EBC was collected for Cys-LT measurement. Exhaled nitric oxide level, a marker of airway inflammation, was also determined at baseline.

RESULTS

Baseline Cys-LT level was higher in the asthmatic group versus healthy subjects (168 pg/mL /112-223/ vs. 77 pg/mL /36-119/, p = .03). EBC Cys-LT concentration increased in all asthmatic patients post-exercise (n = 17, p = .03), with the increase significantly greater in patients developing exercise-induced bronchospasm (n = 7, p = .03), whereas no change was observed in healthy controls (p = .59). The exercise-induced fall in FEV(1) in asthmatics was related to the increase in EBC Cys-LT concentration (r = -0.40, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that Cys-LT concentration of EBC is elevated minutes after physical exercise in asthmatic patients and strongly supports the concept that the release of this mediator is involved in the development of EIB.

Effect of montelukast or salmeterol added to inhaled fluticasone on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of montelukast, 5 mg, or inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg, added to inhaled fluticasone in reducing the maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after a standardized exercise challenge and response to rescue bronchodilation with albuterol in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 2-period, 4-week, crossover study conducted between December 22, 2005 and November 14, 2008 at 30 centers in Europe, Asia, Mexico, and South America. Patients with asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated an FEV1 of 70% or higher of the predicted value and EIB (defined as a decrease in FEV1 > or = 15% compared with preexercise baseline FEV1 on 2 occasions before randomization). Standardized exercise challenges were performed at baseline (prerandomization) and at the end of each active treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 154 patients randomized, 145 completed the study. Montelukast, compared with salmeterol, significantly reduced the mean maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 (10.6% vs 13.8%; P = .009), mean area under the curve for the first 20 minutes after exercise (116.0% x min vs 168.8% x min; P = .006), and median time to recovery (6.0 vs 11.1 minutes; P = .04). Response to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge was significantly greater (P < .001) with montelukast. Montelukast and salmeterol were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuation and response of EIB to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge were significantly better with montelukast than with salmeterol after 4 weeks of treatment.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children: a comparative systematic review of the available treatment options

The aim of this article is to critically review the efficacy and safety data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), long- or short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs, SABAs), parasympatholytics and oral leukotriene receptor antagonists in the management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with persistent asthma (EIA). The studies with sufficient information on patient characteristics and outcomes were chosen using a MEDLINE search. Results from the individual searches were combined and repeated. Studies were also found by reviewing the reference lists of the articles not included in this review. Studies focusing solely on individuals with asthma and other allergic co-morbidities (i.e. a degree of bronchial reversibility) were considered in this review. To make the paper evidence-based, the design and the quality of different studies were assessed employing the Sign criteria (evidence level [EL] and grades of recommendation [GR]). No additional statistical analyses were performed. Most of studies included paediatric patients with underlying EIA. We need to distinguish children with recurrent asthma symptoms in whom EIB is also present (patients with EIA) from asthmatic subjects whose symptoms appear only as a result of exercise (patients with EIB). Further controller treatment is indicated in patients with EIA and further reliever treatment in patients with EIB. ICSs are the first-choice controller drugs for EIA in children with persistent asthma (Sign grade of recommendation [GR]:A). In children with EIA without complete control with ICSs, SABAs (GR:A), leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) [GR:A] or LABAs (GR:A) may be added to gain control. Treatment with relievers such as SABAs (GR:A), parasympatholytics (GR:B) or, eventually, LABAs (GR:A), administered 10-15 minutes before exercise is the most preferable method of preventing EIB symptoms in children; however, not as monotherapy in children with EIA. The disadvantages and controversy relating to inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use lie in the development of tolerance to their effect when they are used on a regular basis, and the possibility of a resulting underuse of ICSs in patients with EIA. Researchers and guidelines recommend that if any patient requires treatment with a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist more than twice weekly, a low dose of ICSs should be administered. Inhaled parasympatholytics may be effective as preventive relievers in some children with EIB or EIA, especially among those with increased vagal activity. LTRAs have a well balanced efficacy-safety profile in preventing the occurrence of EIB symptoms in children. Compared with LABAs, LTRAs produce persistent attenuation of EIB and possess an additional effect with rescue SABA therapy in persistent asthmatic patients with EIA. A disadvantage of LTRAs is a non-response phenomenon. There are still insufficient data on the efficacy-safety profiles of ICS/LABA combination drugs in the treatment of EIA in children to recommend this treatment without caution. Safety profiles of inhaled SABAs, anticholinergics and montelukast in approved dosages seem sufficient enough to recommend use of these drugs in the prevention of EIB symptoms in children. Many researchers agree that treatment of EIA in children should always be individualized.

Exercise-induced asthma: critical analysis of the protective role of montelukast

Exercise-induced asthma/exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIA/EIB) is a prevalent and clinically important disease affecting young children through older adulthood. These terms are often used interchangeably and the differences are not clearly defined in the literature. The pathogenesis of EIA/EIB may be different in those with persistent asthma compared to those with exercise-induced symptoms only. The natural history of EIA is unclear and may be different for elite athletes. Leukotriene biology has helped the understanding of EIB. The type and intensity of exercise are important factors for EIB. Exercise participation is necessary for proper development and control of EIA is recommended. Symptoms of EIB should be confirmed by proper testing. Biologic markers may also be helpful in diagnosis. Not all exercise symptoms are from EIB. Many medication and nonpharmacologic treatments are available. Asthma education is an important component of managing EIA. Many medications have been tested and the comparisons are complicated. Montelukast is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved asthma and EIB controller and has a number of potential advantages to other asthma medications including short onset of action, ease of use, and lack of tolerance. Not all patients improve with montelukast and rescue medication should be available.

Leukotriene modifiers in the treatment of asthma in children

Asthma is one of the most common respiratory disorders in clinical practice, affecting up to 13% of people worldwide. Inflammation is the most important component of asthma and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended as the first line controller treatment for patients of all ages. Treatment with corticosteroids is often unable to fully control asthma symptoms and progression. Recently, leukotrienes have come to the forefront of research as they have been found play a pivotal role in the airway inflammatory process, and specific drugs have been developed to target them. Cysteiny leukotriene antagonists (LTRAs) have recently emerged as important therapeutic options that show a large potential clinical utility. Three specific LTRAs are licensed for clinical use: montelukast, zafirlukast and pranlukast, although montelukast is the only drug approved in the paediatric age range. It is well tolerated (although adverse effects such as headaches, abdominal pain, rashes, angioedema, pulmonary eosinophilia and arthralgia have been reported) and shows many positive effects in asthmatic patients. Current Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines recommend LTRAs as: (1) a second choice treatment to ICS for patients with mild persistent asthma, (2) an add-on therapy to reduce the dose of ICS in patients with moderate or severe asthma, due to the different and complementary mechanisms of action of these agents. LTRAs may be particularly appropriate choices in a number of clinical situations, including the following: patients with concomitant rhinitis; patients with viral-induced wheeze; patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and, in children aged 2-5 years, to reduce the frequency of asthma exacerbations.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma

Study of the chronobiology of allergic rhinitis (AR) and bronchial asthma (BA) and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the medications used in their treatment began five decades ago. AR is an inflammatory disease of the upper airway tissue with hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in further local inflammation, vasomotor changes, and mucus hypersecretion. Symptoms include sneezing, nasal congestion, and runny and itchy nose. Approximately 25% of children and 40% of adults in USA are affected by AR during one or more seasons of the year. The manifestation and severity of AR symptoms exhibit prominent 24-h variation; in most persons they are worse overnight or early in the morning and often comprise nighttime sleep, resulting in poor daytime quality of life, compromised school and work performance, and irritability and moodiness. BA is also an inflammatory medical condition of the lower airways characterized by hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in greater local inflammation as well as bronchoconstriction, vasomotor change, and mucus hypersecretion. In USA an estimated 6.5 million children and 15.7 million adults have BA. The onset and worsening of BA are signaled by chest wheeze and/or croupy cough and difficult and labored breathing. Like AR, BA is primarily a nighttime medical condition. AR is treated with H1-antagonist, decongestant, and anti-inflammatory (glucocorticoid and leukotriene receptor antagonist and modifier) medications. Only H1-antagonist AR medications have been studied for their chronopharmacology and potential chronotherapy. BA is treated with some of the same medications and also theophylline and beta2-agonists. The chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of many classes of BA medications have been explored. This article reviews the rather extensive knowledge of the chronobiology of AR and BA and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the various medications used in their treatment.

Update on montelukast and its role in the treatment of asthma, allergic rhinitis and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Montelukast sodium (Singulair, Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) is a selective and orally-active leukotriene receptor antagonist with demonstrated effectiveness for treating allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children as young as 12 months of age for allergic asthma and 6 months of age for allergic rhinitis. It was recently approved in the US for prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients who are > or = 15 years of age. This paper updates a prior review of the data on the clinical efficacy of montelukast published in this journal.

Exercise challenge test in 3- to 6-year-old asthmatic children

RATIONALE

The exercise challenge test (ECT) is a common tool to assess exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in school-aged children. EIA has not been explored in the early childhood setting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the existence of EIA in children in this age group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 6-min, controlled, free-run test was performed in 55 children (age range, 3 to 6 years old) who were classified into the following groups: 30 children in whom asthma had been previously diagnosed (group A); and 25 children with prolonged coughing (group B). Spirometry measurements were obtained before the run, and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20 min after the run. A positive finding of EIA was defined as a 13% decrease from baseline FEV(1) or baseline forced expiratory volume in the first 0.5 s (FEV(0.5)). The actual duration of each run was age-related (mean [+/- SD] duration, 4.8 +/- 0.8 min). The nadir in indexes occurred after a mean time of 2.98 +/- 1.31 min. A positive EIA finding determined by FEV(1) was present in 15 children, and by FEV(0.5) in 34 children. Twenty-six children were from group A, but only 8 children were from group B. Wheezing and/or prolonged expiration were associated with a positive test result in 31 of 34 children. Coughing was frequent in children with both negative and positive ECT findings.

CONCLUSION

The present study documents for the first time the presence of EIA in response to a free-run test in early childhood. Our findings suggest that a free-run test for the presence of EIA is suitable, but that the running duration is limited by age. The duration of airflow limitation after exercise is significantly earlier and shorter in young children with asthma compared with older children. FEV(0.5) is a better index than the traditional FEV(1) for describing positive ECT results in young children. The association of wheezing and/or prolonged expiration may help in defining EIA in early childhood in the absence of a spirometer.

Montelukast in pediatric asthma management

Leukotriene modifiers (receptor antagonist and biosynthesis inhibitor) represent the first mediator specific therapeutic option for asthma. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist is the only such agent approved for use in pediatric patients. Montelukast modifies action of leukotrienes, which are the most potent bronchoconstrictors, by blocking Cysteinyl leukotriene receptors. Systemic drug like mountelukast can reach lower airways and improves the peripheral functions which play a crucial role in the evolution of asthma. Review of existing literature showed that montelukast compared to placebo has proven clinical efficacy in better control of day time asthma symptoms, percentage of symptom free days, need for rescue drugs and improvement in FEV 1. Studies also demonstrated improvement in airway inflammation as indicated by reduction in fractional exhaled nitric oxide, a marker of inflammation. Studies comparing low dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with montelukast are limited in children and conclude that it is not superior to ICS. For moderate to severe persistent asthma, montelukast has been compared with long acting beta agonists (LABA) as an add-on therapy to ICS, montelukast was less efficacious and less cost-effective. It has beneficial effects in exercise induced asthma and aspirin-sensitive asthma. Montelukast has onset of action within one hour. Patient satisfaction and compliance was better with montelukast than inhaled anti-inflammatory agents due to oral, once a day administration. The recommended doses of montelukast in asthma are- children 1-5 years: 4 mg chewable tablet, children 6-14 years: 5mg chewable tablet,

ADULTS

10mg tablet; administered once daily. The drug is well tolerated. Based on the presently available data montelukast may be an alternative treatment for mild persistent asthma as monotherapy where ICS cannot be administered. It is also an alternative to LABA as an add-on therapy to ICS for moderate to severe persistent asthma. The other indications for use of montelukast include: allergic rhinitis, exercise induced bronchoconstriction and aspirin-induced asthma.