Validation of a computerized scoring system for foreign body aspiration: An observational study

Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS)-a prospectively validated algorithm for the management and prediction of foreign body aspiration in children

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is a common cause of pediatric morbidity, but a standardized protocol to guide decision-making about bronchoscopy is lacking. We aimed to validate a new Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS) for the pediatric emergency department (ED). Patients aged 0-18 years referred to the ED for suspected FBA were prospectively enrolled. FOBAS was calculated according to clinical features of a choking episode, sudden cough, exposure to nuts, absence of fever and rhinitis, stridor, and unilateral auscultatory and radiological findings. FBA risk was evaluated based on the total score (low, 1-3; moderate, 4-6; high, 7-10). Low-risk children were discharged from the ED and followed clinically. Moderate-risk children were hospitalized and evaluated by a pediatric pulmonologist, and high-risk children were referred directly for therapeutic bronchoscopy. Among the 100 enrolled children (59% males; median age 20 [interquartile range 11-39] months), a foreign body was diagnosed in 1/49 (2%), 14/41 (34.1%), and 9/10 (90%) with low, moderate, and high FOBAS, respectively (P < .001). Logistic regression indicated a higher risk for FBA with higher scores. The odds ratio for each additional point was 2.75 (95% confidence interval 1.78-4.24), and FOBAS showed a high predictive value for FBA (area under the curve 0.89). FOBAS implementation significantly reduced the rate of negative bronchoscopies, from 67.4% annually during 2016-2019 to 50% in 2020 (P = .042).

CONCLUSION

FOBAS reliably predicts FBA in cases of suspected FBA and improves management and in-hospital decision-making.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Foreign body aspiration is a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. • Currently, there is no unified protocol for children referred to the emergency department for suspected FBA, therefore, a well-defined algorithm is needed to improve the decision-making process.

WHAT IS NEW

• The pediatric Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS) is a new, prospectively validated clinical score that shows high sensitivity and specificity for the presence of FBA in children. • FOBAS reduces unnecessary admissions and invasive procedures and leads to better clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of Foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS) in children- A retrospective cohort study

Foreign Body Aspiration (FBA) is a common medical emergency among young children, but the evaluation and management of a suspected FBA case can vary across physicians and centers. We aimed to identify which clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings can predict FBA in children and to evaluate a clinical score to improve FBA prediction. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-18 years admitted to Soroka University Medical Center between 2010 and 2020 with suspected FBA. All patients underwent flexible bronchoscopy and were divided into positive and negative FBA groups. A newly developed foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS), based on medical history, physical examination, and chest X-ray findings, was evaluated for its predictability. The study included 412 children (median age 21 months, 56.8% females), of whom 154 (37.4%) had FBA and 258 (62.6%) did not. Multivariate regression analysis showed exposure to nuts/seeds, unilateral wheezing or decreased breath sounds, stridor, and suggestive findings on chest X-ray were significant risk factors for FBA (OR [95%CI] -1.994[1.290-3.082], 1.487[1.206-1.832], 1.883 [1.011-3.509] and 2.386[1.917-2.970], respectively). However, a choking episode, acute cough, and absence of fever and rhinorrhea did not predict FBA. FOBAS showed an increased risk of FBA for each additional point of the score, with an odds ratio of 1.572 (95% CI-1.389-1.799).  Conclusion: FOBAS is a good predictor for the presence of FBA in children. Once prospectively validated, FOBAS could aid in decision-making at the emergency department, enabling more standardized care, reducing unnecessary procedures, and leading to better clinical outcomes. What is Known: • The evaluation and management of a child with suspected foreign body aspiration (FBA) vary across physicians and centers, without a consensus regarding the indications and criteria for performing bronchoscopy. • Flexible bronchoscopy is the standard procedure for the diagnosis and sometimes treatment of FBA in children, but it may hold potential complications. What is New: • We propose a newly developed foreign body aspiration score (FOBAS), based on medical history, physical examination, and chest X-ray findings, for the prediction of FBA in children at the emergency department. • The FOBAS is a good predictor of FBA in children. The score enables more standardized care and may reduce unnecessary procedures.

Using Machine Learning Technique to Predict the Most Reliable Diagnostic Finding for Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: Symptoms, Chest X-ray, or Auscultation?

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is one of the most critical and life-threatening pediatric emergency situations. Prompt diagnosis in these cases is very important as they are associated with high mortality among children. When diagnosing FBA, symptoms of the patient, auscultation findings, and chest X-ray findings are usually evaluated. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of all the cases involving suspicion of FBA in children under the age of 18 years who were hospitalized in the Department of Pediatric Surgery at Denizli Pamukkale University Hospital, Turkey from January 2005 to September 2020. Instead of traditional statistical methods, we used machine learning techniques such as random forest and logistic regression to determine which finding was diagnostically the most reliable. The variables included in the analysis that were considered to be significant were as follows: symptoms, auscultation findings, chest X-ray findings, patient gender, age, location of the foreign body, and the time of admission. For the purpose of this study, we developed four different models. Model 1 included gender, age, time of admission, location, and symptoms as variables; the correct classification rate of the model was found to be 82.3%. Model 2 included auscultation findings in addition to Model 1, and the correct classification rate of the model was 84.8%. Model 3 included chest X-ray findings in addition to Model 1, and the correct classification rate of the model was 87.4%. Model 4, on the other hand, included both auscultation findings and chest X-ray findings in addition to Model 1, and the correct classification rate of the model was 87.6%. Based on our findings, a definitive diagnosis of FBA using only symptoms, auscultation findings, or chest X-ray findings in isolation does not seem possible. Additionally, using only symptoms and chest X-ray findings is also insufficient to make a diagnosis.

Diagnostic Errors in Initial Misdiagnosis of Foreign Body Aspiration in Children: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in China

Background: Foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children is a common emergency that can easily be missed, leading to delays in treatment. Few large cohort studies have focused on errors in diagnostic assessment. The main purpose of this study was to analyze factors contributing to the initial misdiagnosis of FBA in children. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 226 children diagnosed with FBA at the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2018 to November 2020. Cases were divided into two groups according to whether or not patients were initially misdiagnosed. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were then compared. The Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy tool was applied to cases with initial misdiagnosis. Results: Of the 226 included children with a final diagnosis of FBA, 153 (67.7%) were boys. Ninety percent of patients were under 3 years old. More than half (61.9%) of the children were referred from primary institutions, and 38.1% visited tertiary hospitals directly. A total of 80 (35.4%) patients were initially misdiagnosed. More than half of misdiagnosed children received an alternative diagnosis of bronchiolitis (51.3%), the most common alternative diagnosis. Test failures (i.e., errors in test ordering, test performance, and clinician processing) were primarily responsible for the majority of initial diagnostic errors (76.3%), followed by failure or delay in eliciting critical case history information (20.0%). Characteristics significantly associated with initial misdiagnosis were: presentation over 24 h (OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.8-17.5), being referred from primary institutions (OR 8.8, 4.1-19.0), no witnessed aspiration crisis (OR 7.8, 3.0-20.3), (4) atypical signs or symptoms (OR 3.2, 1.8-5.7), foreign body not visible on CT (OR 36.2, 2.1-636.8), foreign body located in secondary bronchi (OR 4.8, 1.3-17.2), organic foreign body (OR 6.2, 1.4-27.2), and history of recurrent respiratory infections (OR 2.7, 1.4-5.3). Children with misdiagnosis tended to have a longer time from symptom onset to the definitive diagnosis of FBA (P < 0.001). Conclusions: More than one-third of children with FBA were missed at first presentation. Errors in diagnostic testing and history taking were the main reasons leading to initial misdiagnosis.

A new scoring system and clinical algorithm for the management of suspected foreign body aspiration in children: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cases of foreign body aspiration in children may be encountered in emergency departments. A suggestive history is important in diagnosing aspirated foreign body owing to the difficulty in making a diagnosis on the basis of an abnormal physical examination or chest radiography alone. The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the presenting symptoms, physical examination, and radiologic findings as predictors of foreign body aspiration in children. In addition, a feasible simple algorithm with a scoring system was generated to indicate bronchoscopic investigation.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort, medical records of patients aged less than 16 years with suspected foreign body aspiration who underwent flexible or rigid bronchoscopy were included. Data including age, sex, symptoms, physical examination findings, radiological features, nature and location of the foreign body, and outcome of the bronchoscopy were collected, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was employed for prediction of foreign body aspiration.

RESULTS

A total of 203 children were included, and the model showed excellent discrimination power for positive foreign body aspiration (area under the curve = 0.911) with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 86.2, 90.6, and 76.6%, respectively. The total weighted risk score at a cut-off > 2 showed a significant good power of discrimination (area under the curve = 0.879), with a sensitivity of 79.9% and specificity of 84.4%. Accordingly, a clinical algorithm was recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed scoring system and clinical algorithm might help in decision making with regard to the need and type of bronchoscopy in children presenting with potential foreign body aspiration. However, further prospective multicenter studies should be conducted to validate this scoring system.