Influence of culture media on the morphological differentiation of the PC-3 and DU145 prostatic neoplastic cell lines

The Apoptotic and Anti-Warburg Effects of Brassinin in PC-3 Cells via Reactive Oxygen Species Production and the Inhibition of the c-Myc, SIRT1, and β-Catenin Signaling Axis

Though Brassinin is known to have antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor effects in colon, prostate, breast, lung, and liver cancers, the underlying antitumor mechanism of Brassinin is not fully understood so far. Hence, in the current study, the apoptotic mechanism of Brassinin was explored in prostate cancer. Herein, Brassinin significantly increased the cytotoxicity and reduced the expressions of pro-Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), pro-caspase 3, and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) in PC-3 cells compared to DU145 and LNCaP cells. Consistently, Brassinin reduced the number of colonies and increased the sub-G1 population and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells in the PC-3 cells. Of note, Brassinin suppressed the expressions of pyruvate kinase-M2 (PKM2), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), hexokinase 2 (HK2), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as glycolytic proteins in the PC-3 cells. Furthermore, Brassinin significantly reduced the expressions of SIRT1, c-Myc, and β-catenin in the PC-3 cells and also disrupted the binding of SIRT1 with β-catenin, along with a protein-protein interaction (PPI) score of 0.879 and spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.47 being observed between SIRT1 and β-catenin. Of note, Brassinin significantly increased the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in the PC-3 cells. Conversely, ROS scavenger NAC reversed the ability of Brassinin to attenuate pro-PARP, pro-Caspase3, SIRT1, and β-catenin in the PC-3 cells. Taken together, these findings support evidence that Brassinin induces apoptosis via the ROS-mediated inhibition of SIRT1, c-Myc, β-catenin, and glycolysis proteins as a potent anticancer candidate.

Action, localization and structure-function relationship of growth factors and their receptors in the prostate

Whereas the direct action of sex steroids, namely of androgens, on prostate cell division was questioned as early as in the 1970s, and remains so, the interest in prostatic growth factors (GFs) is rather recent but has expanded tremendously in the last five years. This lag period can be partly explained by the fact that, at the time, androgen receptors had just been discovered, and newly developed hormonal regimens or strategies to treat patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) or epithelioma had generated great enthusiasm and hopes in the medical and scientific community. Another point to consider was the difficulty in maintaining prostate tissues in organ cultures and the relative novelty of culturing prostate epithelial cells in monolayers. Failures of sex steroids to elicit a direct positive response on prostate cell divisionin vitro, as seenin vivo, were interpreted as resulting from inappropriate models or culture conditions. However, the increasing number of reports confirming the lack of mitogenic activity of sex steroidsin vitro, coupled with the powerful mitogenic activity of GFs displayed in other systems, the discovery of GF receptors (GF-Rs), and the elucidation of their signalling pathways showing sex steroid receptors as potential substrates of GF-activated protein kinases gradually led to an increased interest in the putative role of GFs in prostate physiopathology. Of utmost importance was the recognition that hormone refractiveness was responsible for PCa progression, and for the poor outcome of patients with advanced disease under endocrine therapies. This problem remains a major issue and it raises several key questions that need to be solved at the fundamental and clinical levels.

Adrenal steroids in human prostatic cancer cell lines

Adrenal androgens function as an androgen source within prostate and androgen target tissue. This study compares the ability of three human prostatic cancer cell lines to metabolize the adrenal androgens, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and androstenedione under living culture conditions. Androgen-independent cell lines PC-3 and DU145 and androgen-dependent cell line LNCaP were investigated. The effect of glucuronide and sulfate conjugates was also investigated. There was a strong tendency in PC-3 or DU145 to convert androstenedione to DHEA or DHEA-S reservoir. On the other hand, LNCaP was capable of converting DHEA into androstenedione and subsequently into dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Moreover, androgens were converted into a glucuronide conjugate in LNCaP, but not in PC-3 or DU145. As a result, the metabolism of the adrenal precursor shifted to androgen formation in LNCaP. This could be confirmed by means of reverse transcription-PCR of uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl-transferase (UGT) 2B15. Kinetic properties of UGT activity in LNCaP revealed DHT to be a better substrate than testosterone. In conclusion, the findings show that the adrenal precursor pool has the potential to contribute to the regulation of prostatic cells. Moreover, the presence of UGT activities in LNCaP may have a regulatory effect on the active androgen level in the intracellular environment.

Expression of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha mRNA in human prostate cancer cell lines

Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha (RPTPalpha) is a transmembrane protein phosphatase, and has been proposed to be involved in the differentiation of the neuronal system. In the present study, we demonstrated the expression of RPTPalpha mRNA in several normal human tissues. We further investigated the regulation of expression of RPTPalpha mRNA in epithelial cells utilizing three commercially available human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC-3 and DU145. This is because these cells exhibit different levels of differentiation, defined by the expression of a tissue-specific differentiation antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAcP), and their androgen sensitivity. LNCaP cells express PAcP and are androgen-sensitive cells, while PC-3 and DU145 cells do not express PAcP and are androgen-insensitive cells. Northern blot analyses revealed that, in LNCaP cells, fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) down-regulates RPTPalpha mRNA expression, similar to the effect on PAcP. Contrarily, FBS up-regulated the RPTPalpha mRNA level in PC-3 and DU145 cells. In LNCaP cells, sodium butyrate inhibited cell growth and up-regulated RPTPalpha as well as PAcP mRNA expression. Although, sodium butyrate also inhibited the growth of PC-3 and DU145 cells, the level of RPTPalpha mRNA was decreased in PC-3, while increased in DU145 cells. Thus, data taken together indicate that the expression of RPTPalpha is apparently regulated by a similar mechanism to that of PAcP in LNCaP cells.

Identification of a high frequency of chromosomal rearrangements in the centromeric regions of prostate cancer cell lines by sequential giemsa banding and spectral karyotyping

BACKGROUND

Currently, prostate cancer (CaP) cytogenetics is not well defined, largely because of technical difficulties in obtaining primary tumor metaphases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined three CaP cell lines (LNCaP, DU145, PC-3) using sequential Giemsa banding and spectral karyotyping (SKY) to search for a common structural aberration or translocation breakpoint. No consistent rearrangement common to all three cell lines was detected. A clustering of centromeric translocation breakpoints was detected in chromosomes 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, and 15 in DU145 and PC-3. Both these lines were found to have karyotypes with a greater level of complexity than LNCaP.

CONCLUSION

The large number of structural aberrations present in DU145 and PC-3 implicate an underlying chromosomal instability and subsequent accumulation of cytogenetic alterations that confer a selective growth advantage. The high frequency of centromeric rearrangements in these lines indicates a potential role for mitotic irregularities associated with the centromere in CaP tumorigenesis.

Growth factor PDGF-B/v-sis confers a tumorigenic phenotype to human tumor cells bearing PDGF receptors but not to cells devoid of receptors: evidence for an autocrine, but not a paracrine, mechanism

Numerous established human tumor lines co-express platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and cognate receptors, suggesting that an autocrine and/or paracrine growth mechanism may be a causal or contributing mechanism to their transformed phenotype. Indeed, it is known that a PDGF-autocrine system is functional in several established tumor lines, especially in human gliomas, and a model for a functional paracrine mechanism has been established in a human melanoma line. However, at least 168 human cell lines representing 26 different human tumor types have been reported to continuously express PDGF-A and/or -B chains, and 55 of these also express PDGF receptors. For the majority of these cases, the significance of co-expression and the relative roles of autocrine and paracrine mechanisms in transformation remains unclear. Here, we show that human glioblastoma T98G cells co-express PDGF-B/c-sis and moderate levels of the cognate beta-type PDGF receptor (PR-beta) but are not tumorigenic in athymic mice. In contrast, human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells do not express PR-beta and are tumorigenic. Clonal lines of each cell type with greatly increased secretion of p16w(T98Gsis and MCF-7sis cells) were characterized. T98Gsis cells are 85% tumorigenic and occasionally develop pulmonary metastases, showing that endogenous PR-beta can mediate complete transformation upon sufficient stimulation. In contrast, MCF-7sis cells exhibit some growth slowing in vitro and an exactly proportional decrease in tumor growth rate. We conclude that a PDGF-autocrine, and not a paracrine, mechanism best accounts for the acquired tumorigenicity of T98Gsis cells, thereby emphasizing the potential significance of expression of even moderate levels of PR-beta by human tumor cells.

Computer-assisted microscope characterization of BCNU-induced modifications in the collective behavior of 12 human brain cancer cell lines

The aim of our study is to characterize the disturbance induced by repeated BCNU treatments in 12 human brain tumor cell lines in terms of their collective behavior. This collective behavior was characterized by means of the Delaunay triangulation and Voronoi mathematical paving techniques combined with the computer-assisted microscope analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. This methodology enabled growth to be characterized in terms of cell colony size and density. In addition to this colony pattern characterization, the DNA ploidy level was assessed by means of DNA histogram typing. The cell proliferation level was also determined. Ten astrocytic and two medulloblastoma cell lines treated weekly with BCNU were analyzed. Study of the cell colony architecture and cell proliferation revealed specific BCNU-induced modifications in connection with the origins of the cell lines, i.e. astrocytoma (AST), glioblastoma (GBM), or medulloblastoma (MED). The BCNU-induced effect on GBM (the more malignant of the cell lines) was very different in that proliferation was weakened, but the cell colony density increased after a latency phase. The decrease in cell colony density and cell proliferation of MED seems to indicate that they are more sensitive to BCNU than GBM, but relatively tolerant of this type of chemotherapy in comparison with AST.

In vitro characterization of prolactin-induced effects on proliferation in the neoplastic LNCaP, DU145, and PC3 models of the human prostate

BACKGROUND

Proliferation of normal and tumoral prostate tissue is regulated by androgens and various growth factors. We characterized the in vitro proliferative influence of prolactin (PRL) in androgen-sensitive and androgen-insensitive human prostate cancers.

METHODS

The biologic models employed included the androgen-sensitive LNCaP and the androgen-insensitive DU145 and PC3 cell lines. PRL-induced influences (0.1-10 mIU/ml of medium) on proliferation were assessed using the colorimetric methylthiotetrazole assay. Androgen sensitivity in the three cell lines was determined by assessing the proliferative influence of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (0.1-10 nM). PRL-induced modifications in PC3 cell kinetics were assessed using Feulgen-stained nuclear image cytometry.

RESULTS

Although DHT markedly stimulated LNCaP proliferation, it had no proliferative effect on the DU145 and PC3 cell lines. By contrast, PRL significantly modulated the proliferation of the DU145 and PC3 lines, but exerted weak, if any, effect on the proliferation of the LNCaP cell line. PRL increased the percentage of PC3 proliferating cells (i.e., cells in the S/G2 phases of the cell cycle) at low doses (0.1 mIU/mL) and decreased this percentage at high doses (10 mIU/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Proliferation of androgen-insensitive human prostate cell lines can be significantly modulated by prolactin.

Influence of dihydrotestosterone, epidermal growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor on the cell kinetics of the PC3, DU145, and LNCaP prostatic cancer cell lines: relationship with DNA ploidy level

The cell kinetics (percentage of cells in the S+G2 phases of the cell cycle) and the DNA ploidy levels (nuclear DNA content) were determined in 108 samples each of the PC3, DU145, and LNCaP prostate cancer models. This was carried out by means of the digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. Two to three hundred cell nuclei were analyzed for each of the 324 samples under study. The three cell lines were submitted to experimental conditions including the addition of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), either alone or in combination, to the culture media. The results show that under the present culture conditions, the PC3 cell line was DHT-, EGF- and bFGF-insensitive. In contrast to what is generally reported in the literature, the DU145 cell line was DHT- and EGF-sensitive under the present culture conditions, but bFGF-insensitive. The LNCaP cell line was DHT-sensitive, but EGF- and bFGF-insensitive. While mainly tetraploid, the three cell lines nevertheless exhibited a significant level of heterogeneity in their nuclear DNA content distributions. Indeed, the proportions of non-tetraploid (diploid, hyperdiploid, triploid, hypertriploid, hypertetraploid, polymorphic) DNA histograms were 14% in the PC3, 16% in the DU145, and 29% in the LNCaP cell lines. These results suggest that the DNA ploidy level would not influence the hormone sensitivity level in the cell lines since they had significantly distinct hormone sensitivity profiles while remaining mainly tetraploid.

Relationship between DNA ploidy level and tumor sociology behavior in 12 nervous cell lines

Cell population sociology was studied in two medulloblastomas and 10 astrocytic human tumor cell lines by means of the characterization of the structure of neoplastic cell colonies growing on histological slides. This was carried out via digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei, to which the Delaunay triangulation and Voronoi paving mathematical techniques were applied. Such assessments were compared to the DNA polidy level (assessed by means of DNA histogram typing). The results show that the cell colony architecture characteristics differed markedly according to whether the cell lines were euploid (diploid or tetraploid) or aneuploid (hyperdiploid, triploid, hypertriploid, or polymorphic). In fact, the cell colonies from the euploid cell nuclei populations were larger and more dense than those from the aneuploid ones. Furthermore, for an identical period of culture, the cell lines from high-grade malignant astrocytic tumors (glioblastomas) exhibited cell colonies that were larger and more dense than those in cell lines from low-grade astrocytic tumors (astrocytomas). In each of these two groups, the diploid cell nuclei populations exhibited cell colonies larger and more dense than the nondiploid colonies. The present methodology is now being applied in vivo to histological sections of surgically removed human brain tumors in order to distinguish between high-risk clinical subgroups and medium-risk subgroups in clearly circumscribed histopathological groups.