Robotic-assisted repair of iatrogenic common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Surgical technique and outcomes

Surgical Management of Postcholecystectomy Strasberg Type E4 Bile Duct Injuries

INTRODUCTION

High-biliary injuries are associated with worse outcomes. Most series do not mention failure rates specific to the injury grade. In our experience, Strasberg E4 injuries are associated with a higher failure rate. This study shares our experience with the surgical management of postcholecystectomy Strasberg E4 injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient demographics, radiological findings, operative details, and postoperative complications were collected for patients with Strasberg E4 injury from October 2003 to December 2020. Between 2003 and 2010, the preferred operation was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). In cases of right lobe atrophy or an isolated right hepatic duct injury, a primary hepatic resection was considered. From 2010 onward, Strasberg E4 injuries were considered for a right hepatectomy with the left duct HJ. Patients were followed up at six monthly intervals with liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had Strasberg E4 injuries, thirteen presented with an external biliary fistula and three presented with obstructive jaundice. Nine of the ten patients who underwent HJ before 2010 developed cholangitis at a median follow-up of 14 months (2-28 months). Five of these subsequently underwent a hepatectomy, one underwent a liver transplant, and the other three underwent radiological dilatation of their anastomoses. From 2010 onward, six patients underwent an upfront right hepatectomy with left duct anastomosis. At a median follow-up of 40 months (10-74 months), 3 patients had minor derangement of liver enzymes, and none required an endoscopic or radiological intervention.

CONCLUSION

HJ in E4 injuries often produces poor long-term results. An upfront right hepatectomy with left duct anastomosis might be considered.

Real-Time Navigation in Liver Surgery Through Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: An Updated Analysis of Worldwide Protocols and Applications

BACKGROUND

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has seen extensive application across medical and surgical fields, praised for its real-time navigation capabilities and low toxicity. Initially employed to assess liver function, ICG fluorescence is now integral to liver surgery, aiding in tumor detection, liver segmentation, and the visualization of bile leaks. This study reviews current protocols and ICG fluorescence applications in liver surgery, with a focus on optimizing timing and dosage based on clinical indications.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the literature up to 27 January 2024, using PubMed and Medline to identify studies on ICG fluorescence used in liver surgery. A systematic review was performed to evaluate dosage and timing protocols for ICG administration.

RESULTS

Of 1093 initial articles, 140 studies, covering a total of 3739 patients, were included. The studies primarily addressed tumor detection (40%), liver segmentation (34.6%), and both (21.4%). The most common ICG fluorescence dose for tumor detection was 0.5 mg/kg, with administration occurring from days to weeks pre-surgery. Various near-infrared (NIR) camera systems were utilized, with the PINPOINT system most frequently cited. Tumor detection rates averaged 87.4%, with a 10.5% false-positive rate. Additional applications include the detection of bile leaks, lymph nodes, and vascular and biliary structures.

CONCLUSIONS

ICG fluorescence imaging has emerged as a valuable tool in liver surgery, enhancing real-time navigation and improving clinical outcomes. Standardizing protocols could further enhance ICG fluorescence efficacy and reliability, benefitting patient care in hepatic surgeries.

Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature

BACKGROUNDS

Laparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).

RESULTS

36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.

Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the established gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder diseases. However, robotic cholecystectomy is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in LC and robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in patients with nonmalignant gallbladder conditions. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing RAC to LC in patients with benign gallbladder disease. Only randomized trials and non-randomized studies with propensity score matching were included. Mean differences (MDs) were computed for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.2.3. A total of 13 studies comprising 22,440 patients were included, of whom 10,758 patients (47.94%) underwent RAC. The mean age was 48.5 years and 65.2% were female. Compared with LC, RAC significantly increased operative time (MD 12.59 min; 95% CI 5.62-19.55; p < 0.01; I2 = 79%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in hospitalization time (MD -0.18 days; 95% CI - 0.43-0.07; p = 0.07; I2 = 89%), occurrence of intraoperative complications (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.38-1.15; p = 0.14; I2 = 35%) and bile duct injury (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.64, 1.55; p = 0.97; I2 = 0%). RAC was associated with an increase in operative time compared with LC without increasing hospitalization time or the incidence of intraoperative complications. These findings suggest that RAC is a safe approach to benign gallbladder disease.

Minimally invasive surgery for post cholecystectomy biliary stricture: current evidence and future perspectives

Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) remains a devastating iatrogenic complication that adversely impacts the quality of life with high healthcare costs. Despite a decrease in the incidence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related BDI, the absolute number remains high as cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure. Open Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with meticulous surgical technique remains the gold standard surgical procedure with excellent long-term results in most patients. As with many hepatobiliary disorders, a minimally invasive approach has been recently explored to minimize access-related complications and improve postoperative recovery. Since patients with gallstone disease are often admitted for a minimally invasive cholecystectomy, laparoscopic and robotic approaches for repairing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture are attractive. While recent series have shown the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive post-cholecystectomy biliary stricture management, most are retrospective analyses with small sample sizes. Also, long-term follow-up is available only in a limited number of studies. The principles and technique of minimally invasive repair resemble open repair except for the extent of adhesiolysis and the suturing technique with continuous sutures commonly used in minimally invasive approaches. The robotic approach overcomes key limitations of laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to become the preferred minimally invasive approach for the repair of postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. Despite increasing use, lack of prospective studies and selection bias with available evidence precludes definitive conclusions regarding minimally invasive surgery for managing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. High-volume prospective studies are required to confirm the initial promising outcomes with minimally invasive surgery.

Hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury: state of the art

BACKGROUND

Hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) is the gold standard procedure for the reconstruction of the bile duct in many benign and malignant situations. One of the major situation is the bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy, either for early or late repair. This procedure presents some specificities associated to a debated management of BDI.

PURPOSE

This article provides a state-of-the-art of the hepaticojejunostomy procedure focusing on bile duct injury including its indications and outcomes CONCLUSION: Performed at the right moment and respecting the technical rules, HJ provides a restoration of the biliary patency in the long term of 80 to 90%. It is the main surgical technique to repair BDI. Complications and failure of this procedure can be difficult to manage. That is why the primary repair requires an appropriate multidisciplinary approach associated with an expert high quality surgical technique.

Robotic biliary surgery for benign and malignant bile duct obstruction: a case series

The majority of patients with benign or malignant biliary obstruction require surgical treatment with a bilio-enteric anastomosis. This requires fine dissection and advanced suturing. Robotic surgery may overcome some major limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery. The precise role of robotic biliary surgery is, however, still to be defined. In our institution, patients requiring complex bile duct surgery were consecutively selected for minimally invasive robotic surgery from September 2020. All surgeries were undertaken using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System^® (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Intra-operative technique and postoperative outcome were analyzed. A total number of 14 patients underwent robotic biliary surgery for a variety of benign and malignant indications between September 2020 and May 2021. Six of fourteen patients (43%) had previous open abdominal surgery. Median blood loss was 25 mL (range 10-120 mL). There were no intra-operative complications and no conversions. Length of stay was between 3 and 11 days without major postoperative morbidity. Robotic surgery for benign and malignant bile duct obstruction is efficient and safe in experienced hands. Referral to a high-volume expert center is, however, advised.

Minimally invasive biliary anastomosis after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a systematic review

Major bile duct injuries (BDIs) may require complex surgical repairs that are usually performed with a conventional open approach. This study aims to analyze current evidence concerning the safety and the outcomes of the minimally invasive (MI) approach for biliary anastomosis in post-cholecystectomy BDIs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web-Of-Science indexed studies involving MI (laparoscopic or robotic) biliary anastomosis in patients with iatrogenic BDIs was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. A total of 13 studies involving 198 patients were included. One hundred and twenty-five patients (63.1%) underwent a laparoscopic biliary anastomosis, while 73 (36.1%) received an analogue robotic procedure. All the included BDIs were types D and E (E1-E5). The mean OT varied between 190 and 330 (mean = 227) minutes. Ten studies reported the mean intraoperative blood loss that ranged between 50 and 252 (mean = 135.9) mL. No conversions occurred in the robotic series, while four patients required conversion to open surgery among the laparoscopic ones. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.3 days. The reported overall morbidity was similar among the robotic and laparoscopic series. During the follow-up period, no surgery-related mortality occurred. A growing number of referral centers are showing the safety and feasibility of the MI approach for biliary anastomosis in patients with major BDIs. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

When should endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis transection Glissonean pedicle not be used in hepatectomy? A case report

BACKGROUND

The literature on post-hepatectomy bile duct injury (PHBDI) is limited, lacking large sample retrospective studies and high-quality experience summaries. Therefore, we reported a special case of iatrogenic bile duct injury caused by Glissonean pedicle transection with endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (endo-GIA) during a right hepatectomy, analyzed the causes of this injury, and summarized the experience with this patient.

CASE SUMMARY

We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with recurrent abdominal pain and cholangitis due to intrahepatic cholangiectasis (Caroli's disease). Preoperative evaluation revealed that the lesion and dilated bile ducts were confined to the right liver, with right hepatic atrophy, left hepatic hypertrophy, and hilar translocation. This problem can be resolved by performing a standard right hepatectomy. Although the operation went well, jaundice occurred soon after the operation. Iatrogenic bile duct injury was considered after magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography review, and the second operation were performed 10 d later. During the second operation, it was found that the endo-GIA had damaged the lateral wall of the hepatic duct and multiple titanium nails remained in the bile duct wall. This led to severe stenosis of the duct wall, and could not be repaired. Therefore, the injured bile duct was transected, and a hepatic-jejunal-lateral Roux-Y anastomosis was performed at the healthy part of the left hepatic duct. After this surgery, the patient had a smooth postoperative recovery, and the total bilirubin gradually decreased to normal. The patient was discharged 41 d after operation. No anastomotic stenosis was found at the 6 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Not all cases are suitable for endo-GIA transection of Glissonean pedicle, especially in cases of intrahepatic bile duct lesions. PHBDI caused by endo-GIA is very difficult to repair due to extensive ischemia, which requires special attention.

Comparison of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine and Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background

Postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) arises from incision sites and residual intraperitoneal CO2 gas. Opioids as a class of pain-relieving drugs are broadly used to control pain after LC; however, these drugs can cause various side effects.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine with that of intravenous ketorolac in managing postoperative pain in patients who had undergone LC.

Methods

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out on patients who had undergone LC. Ninety patients who had undergone elective LC were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 30 for each group). Group A received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine solution intraperitoneally at the end of the operation; group B received 30 mg of ketorolac intravenously 30 minutes before surgery and every 8 hours after surgery, and patients in group C received normal saline intraperitoneally and intravenous injection. The patients were postoperatively assessed for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, postoperative opioid consumption, shoulder pain, side effects (sedation, nausea, and vomiting), and satisfaction. The data were analyzed using SPSS. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine and intravenous injection of ketorolac were significantly effective in reducing postoperative abdominal pain, shoulder pain, and incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to the placebo group (P < 0.001). Although intraperitoneal bupivacaine and intravenous ketorolac had no significant difference in pain relief compared with each other, patients in both bupivacaine and ketorolac groups were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia compared to the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraperitoneal injection of bupivacaine and intravenous injection of ketorolac both are safe and effective methods to control pain, nausea, and vomiting after LC.

2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.

Minimally invasive surgery for the management of major bile duct injury due to cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been a growing interest in the application of minimally invasive surgery in the management of cholecystectomy-related injury to the biliary tract. The aim of this analysis was to identify and combine the available evidence on the argument, with particular reference to major injuries to the main bile duct requiring biliodigestive anastomosis.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were queried through May 2019. Inclusion criteria considered all studies reporting detailed data about patients with bile duct injury following cholecystectomy receiving minimally invasive (both laparoscopic and robotic) surgical repair. Clinical outcomes data were pooled and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies reporting on the outcomes of 218 patients were eventually included in the analysis, whereby 148 patients with type D or E injury. Of these, there were 31 patients (21%) receiving direct bile duct repair and 117 patients (79%) undergoing bilioenteric reconstruction. Among patients with major bile duct injury, postoperative morbidity was 24%, being 12% the incidence of major complications and 6% the rate of patients requiring subsequent, further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of high-level evidences precludes the possibility to draw definitive conclusions. However, the available data derived from a growing number of centers demonstrate that minimally invasive surgery may offer its well-known advantages on postoperative outcomes also in the setting of severe iatrogenic injury to the bile ducts.

Robotic Biliary Surgery

Robotic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible approach and can be combined with common bile duct exploration to address complicated pathology in a single setting. This article summarizes reported outcomes after robotic biliary surgery. A technical overview of robotic multiport and single port cholecystectomy is provided. Last, the approach to benign bile duct disease during robotic cholecystectomy, including reconstruction of the biliary tree, is described.

Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison

Robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is progressively gaining momentum. It seems to provide some potential advantages over open approach. Unfortunately, only few studies investigated the impact of RPD on the oncologic outcomes. We performed a 1:1 case-matched comparison between two groups of 35 patients affected by a malignant tumor who underwent RPD and open (OPD) pancreaticoduodenectomy from August 2014 to April 2016. Operative time was longer in the RPD group compared to OPD (355 vs 262 min, p = 0.023), whereas median blood loss (235 vs 575 ml, p = 0.016) and length of hospitalization (6.5 vs 8.9 days, p = 0.041) were lower for RPD. A significant reduction of overall postoperative morbidity rate was found in the RPD group compared to the OPD group (31.4% vs 48.6% p = 0.034). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of overall pancreatic fistula rate, R0 resection rate, and number of harvested lymph nodes. The overall and disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years were similar. RPD is a safe and effective technique. It reduces the estimated blood loss, the length hospital of stay and the rate of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, while preserving a good oncologic adequacy.