A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR and its therapeutic applications: From viral infections to cancer immunotherapy

Unveiling RNA Editing by ADAR and APOBEC Protein Gene Families

RNA editing is a crucial post-transcriptional modification that alters the transcriptome and proteome and affects many cellular processes, including splicing, microRNA specificity, stability of RNA molecules, and protein structure. Enzymes from the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) protein families mediate RNA editing and can alter a variety of non-coding and coding RNAs, including all regions of mRNA molecules, leading to tumor development and progression. This review provides novel insights into the potential use of RNA editing parameters, such as editing levels, expression of ADAR and APOBEC genes, and specifically edited genes, as biomarkers for cancer progression, distinguishing it from previous studies that focused on isolated aspects of RNA editing mechanisms. The methodological section offers clues to accelerate high-throughput analysis of RNA or DNA sequencing data for the identification of RNA editing events.

Methylations in dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by impaired expansion or contraction of the left or both ventricles in the absence of abnormal load conditions (such as primary valve disease) or severe coronary artery disease that can lead to ventricular remodeling. Genetic mutations, infections, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, exposure to toxins, and endocrine or neuromuscular factors have all been implicated in the causation of DCM. Cardiomyopathy, particularly DCM, often has genetic underpinnings, with established or suspected genetic origins. Up to 40% of DCM cases involve probable or confirmed genetic variations. The significance of RNA modification in the pathogenesis of hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and atherosclerosis is well-established. Of late, RNA methylation has garnered attention for its involvement in DCM. This review examines the biological mechanisms and effects of RNA methylation in DCM and heart failure.

ADAR1 Promotes NUPR1 A-to-I RNA Editing to Exacerbate Ischemic Brain Injury by Microglia Mediated Neuroinflammation

Microglial cells occupy a crucial position as potential therapeutic targets in the context of ischemic stroke (IS). Nonetheless, the intrinsic mechanisms that govern microglial activation in the aftermath of IS remain incompletely elucidated. ADAR1 p150 plays a significant role in immune regulation and stress responses; however, the specific pathways through which it modulates microglial activation and the subsequent mechanisms that unfold following IS have yet to be clearly delineated. The distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO) mouse model was utilized to induce IS. The evaluation of infarct volume was conducted through TTC staining, while neurological function was assessed using the modified Neurological Severity Score (mNSS). To evaluate the expression of ADAR1 and apoptosis-related proteins, immunofluorescence and Western blot techniques were employed. BV2 cells were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation followed by reperfusion (OGD/R). Additionally, a co-culture system of BV2 cells and neurons was established, and subsequent assessments of neuronal viability and apoptosis were performed using CCK-8 assays and LDH release assays. ADAR1 p150 expression was significantly upregulated in the brains of ischemic mice, particularly within microglial cells. The overexpression of ADAR1 p150 was found to promote microglial activation and enhance pro-inflammatory responses, whereas the knockdown of ADAR1 p150 yielded the opposite effect. Additionally, the knockdown of ADAR1 p150 in microglia resulted in a marked reduction in neuronal apoptosis within the co-culture system. Rescue experiments indicated that the knockdown of NUPR1 partially reinstated the inflammatory response previously induced by ADAR1 p150 knockdown. Notably, ADAR1 p150 knockdown also inhibited A-to-I RNA editing while simultaneously upregulating NUPR1. Furthermore, the reduction of ADAR1 expression was associated with decreased infarct volume, improved neurological outcomes, and a significant attenuation of neuroinflammation in dMCAO mice. ADAR1 p150 enhances the microglial inflammatory response and neuronal apoptosis in IS by facilitating A to I RNA editing of NUPR1.

Role of circular RNAs in cancer therapy resistance

Over the past decade, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have gained recognition as a novel class of genetic molecules, many of which are implicated in cancer pathogenesis via different mechanisms, including drug resistance, immune escape, and radio-resistance. ExosomalcircRNAs, in particular, facilitatecommunication between tumour cells and micro-environmental cells, including immune cells, fibroblasts, and other components. Notably, micro-environmental cells can reportedly influence tumour progression and treatment resistance by releasing exosomalcircRNAs. circRNAs often exhibit tissue- and cancer-specific expression patterns, and growing evidence highlights their potential clinical relevance and utility. These molecules show strong promise as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, this review aimed to briefly discuss the latest findings on the roles and resistance mechanisms of key circRNAs in the treatment of various malignancies, including lung, breast, liver, colorectal, and gastric cancers, as well as haematological malignancies and neuroblastoma.This review will contribute to the identification of new circRNA biomarkers for the early diagnosis as well as therapeutic targets for the treatment of cancer.

An exploration of the natural and acquired immunological mechanisms to high-risk human papillomavirus infection and unmasking immune escape in cervical cancer: A concise synopsis

The most common STD that triggers cervical cancer is the human papillomavirus. More than 20 types of human papillomavirus (HPV) can induce uterine cervical cancer. Almost all women acquire genital HPV infection soon after their first intercourse, with most of them clearing the virus within 3 years. An immune response is necessary to clear. The first responders to HPV infection are the innate immune system elements composed of macrophages, keratinocytes, natural killer cells, and natural killer T-lymphocytic (NKT) cells. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) comprise the second line of defense and kill HPV16-infected cells expressing various peptides derived from their transforming early viral oncoproteins, mainly E2•E6. Even though HPV can manage to trick away our immune systems, first of all, it is important to emphasize that HPV replication does not kill the host cells. It does not replicate viral antigens or cause inflammation. The HPV16 E6 and E7 genes suppress host cell type 1 interferons (IFNs), which are detectable after infection. The patient may have immunological tolerance; hence, there are no costimulatory signals from inflammatory cytokines like IFNs during antigen recognition. Evidence shows that HlA class I generations have been inhibited by HPV16 E5, which could protect this tumor cell from CTL attack. HPV16 E7 is responsible for initiating immunotolerance and increasing regulatory T cells (Treg) to repress immunological regression. Evasion from immune system protection plays a critical role in the outcome of persistent HPV infection and the development of cervical cancer. Vaccination against HPV16 and 18 during adolescence is the most effective method for preventing cervical cancer in women, considering the immunological processes involved.

RNA modifications in cancer

RNA modifications are emerging as critical cancer regulators that influence tumorigenesis and progression. Key modifications, such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and 5-methylcytosine (m5C), are implicated in various cellular processes. These modifications are regulated by proteins that write, erase, and read RNA and modulate RNA stability, splicing, translation, and degradation. Recent studies have highlighted their roles in metabolic reprogramming, signaling pathways, and cell cycle control, which are essential for tumor proliferation and survival. Despite these scientific advances, the precise mechanisms by which RNA modifications affect cancer remain inadequately understood. This review comprehensively examines the role RNA modifications play in cancer proliferation, metastasis, and programmed cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis. It explores their effects on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the immune microenvironment, particularly in cancer metastasis. Furthermore, RNA modifications' potential in cancer therapies, including conventional treatments, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies, is discussed. By addressing these aspects, this review aims to bridge current research gaps and underscore the therapeutic potential of targeting RNA modifications to improve cancer treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Dimerization of ADAR1 modulates site-specificity of RNA editing

Adenosine-to-inosine editing is catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) regions. Although three ADARs exist in mammals, ADAR1 is responsible for the vast majority of the editing events and acts on thousands of sites in the human transcriptome. ADAR1 has been proposed to form a stable homodimer and dimerization is suggested to be important for editing activity. In the absence of a structural basis for the dimerization of ADAR1, and without a way to prevent dimer formation, the effect of dimerization on enzyme activity or site specificity has remained elusive. Here, we report on the structural analysis of the third double-stranded RNA-binding domain of ADAR1 (dsRBD3), which reveals stable dimer formation through a large inter-domain interface. Exploiting these structural insights, we engineered an interface-mutant disrupting ADAR1-dsRBD3 dimerization. Notably, dimerization disruption did not abrogate ADAR1 editing activity but intricately affected editing efficiency at selected sites. This suggests a complex role for dimerization in the selection of editing sites by ADARs, and makes dimerization a potential target for modulating ADAR1 editing activity.

Writers, readers, and erasers RNA modifications and drug resistance in cancer

Drug resistance in cancer cells significantly diminishes treatment efficacy, leading to recurrence and metastasis. A critical factor contributing to this resistance is the epigenetic alteration of gene expression via RNA modifications, such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N1-methyladenosine (m1A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), 7-methylguanosine (m7G), pseudouridine (Ψ), and adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing. These modifications are pivotal in regulating RNA splicing, translation, transport, degradation, and stability. Governed by "writers," "readers," and "erasers," RNA modifications impact numerous biological processes and cancer progression, including cell proliferation, stemness, autophagy, invasion, and apoptosis. Aberrant RNA modifications can lead to drug resistance and adverse outcomes in various cancers. Thus, targeting RNA modification regulators offers a promising strategy for overcoming drug resistance and enhancing treatment efficacy. This review consolidates recent research on the role of prevalent RNA modifications in cancer drug resistance, with a focus on m6A, m1A, m5C, m7G, Ψ, and A-to-I editing. Additionally, it examines the regulatory mechanisms of RNA modifications linked to drug resistance in cancer and underscores the existing limitations in this field.

Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA editing in cancer: molecular mechanisms and downstream targets

Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I), one of the most prevalent RNA modifications, has recently garnered significant attention. The A-to-I modification actively contributes to biological and pathological processes by affecting the structure and function of various RNA molecules, including double stranded RNA, transfer RNA, microRNA, and viral RNA. Increasing evidence suggests that A-to-I plays a crucial role in the development of human disease, particularly in cancer, and aberrant A-to-I levels are closely associated with tumorigenesis and progression through regulation of the expression of multiple oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Currently, the underlying molecular mechanisms of A-to-I modification in cancer are not comprehensively understood. Here, we review the latest advances regarding the A-to-I editing pathways implicated in cancer, describing their biological functions and their connections to the disease.

Identification of prognostic RNA editing profiles for clear cell renal carcinoma

Objective

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of renal cancer and currently lacks effective biomarkers. This research aims to analyze and identify RNA editing profile associated with ccRCC prognosis through bioinformatics and in vitro experiments.

Methods

Transcriptome data and clinical information for ccRCC were retrieved from the TCGA database, and RNA editing files were obtained from the Synapse database. Prognostic models were screened, developed, and assessed using consistency index analysis and independent prognostic analysis, etc. Internal validation models were also constructed for further evaluation. Differential genes were investigated using GO, KEGG, and GSEA enrichment analyses. Furthermore, qPCR was performed to determine gene expression in human renal tubular epithelial cells HK-2 and ccRCC cells A-498, 786-O, and Caki-2.

Results

An RNA editing-based risk score, that effectively distinguishes between high and low-risk populations, has been identified. It includes CHD3| chr17:7815229, MYO19| chr17:34853704, OIP5-AS1| chr15:41590962, MRI1| chr19:13883962, GBP4| chr1:89649327, APOL1| chr22:36662830, FCF1| chr14:75203040 edited sites or genes and could serve as an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC patients. qPCR results showed significant up-regulation of CHD3, MYO19, MRI1, APOL1, and FCF1 in A-498, 786-O, and Caki-2 cells, while the expression of OIP5-AS1 and GBP4 was significantly down-regulated.

Conclusion

RNA editing site-based prognostic models are valuable in differentiating between high and low-risk populations. The seven identified RNA editing sites may be utilized as potential biomarkers for ccRCC.

Significant Variations in Double-Stranded RNA Levels in Cultured Skin Cells

Endogenous double-stranded RNA has emerged as a potent stimulator of innate immunity. Under physiological conditions, endogenous dsRNA is maintained in the cell nucleus or the mitochondria; however, if protective mechanisms are breached, it leaches into the cytoplasm and triggers immune signaling pathways. Ectopic activation of innate immune pathways is associated with various diseases and senescence and can trigger apoptosis. Hereby, the level of cytoplasmic dsRNA is crucial. We have enriched dsRNA from two melanoma cell lines and primary dermal fibroblasts, including a competing probe, and analyzed the dsRNA transcriptome using RNA sequencing. There was a striking difference in read counts between the cell lines and the primary cells, and the effect was confirmed by northern blotting and immunocytochemistry. Both mitochondria (10-20%) and nuclear transcription (80-90%) contributed significantly to the dsRNA transcriptome. The mitochondrial contribution was lower in the cancer cells compared to fibroblasts. The expression of different transposable element families was comparable, suggesting a general up-regulation of transposable element expression rather than stimulation of a specific sub-family. Sequencing of the input control revealed minor differences in dsRNA processing pathways with an upregulation of oligoadenylate synthase and RNP125 that negatively regulates the dsRNA sensors RIG1 and MDA5. Moreover, RT-qPCR, Western blotting, and immunocytochemistry confirmed the relatively minor adaptations to the hugely different dsRNA levels. As a consequence, these transformed cell lines are potentially less tolerant to interventions that increase the formation of endogenous dsRNA.

The role of dsRNA A-to-I editing catalyzed by ADAR family enzymes in the pathogeneses

The process of adenosine deaminase (ADAR)-catalyzed double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I) editing is essential for the correction of pathogenic mutagenesis, as well as the regulation of gene expression and protein function in mammals. The significance of dsRNA A-to-I editing in disease development and occurrence is explored using inferential statistics and cluster analyses to investigate the enzymes involved in dsRNA editing that can catalyze editing sites across multiple biomarkers. This editing process, which occurs in coding or non-coding regions, has the potential to activate abnormal signalling pathways that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Notably, the ADAR family enzymes play a crucial role in initiating the editing process. ADAR1 is upregulated in most diseases as an oncogene during tumorigenesis, whereas ADAR2 typically acts as a tumour suppressor. Furthermore, this review also provides an overview of small molecular inhibitors that disrupt the expression of ADAR enzymes. These inhibitors not only counteract tumorigenicity but also alleviate autoimmune disorders, neurological neurodegenerative symptoms, and metabolic diseases associated with aberrant dsRNA A-to-I editing processes. In summary, this comprehensive review offers detailed insights into the involvement of dsRNA A-to-I editing in disease pathogenesis and highlights the potential therapeutic roles for related small molecular inhibitors. These scientific findings will undoubtedly contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine based on dsRNA A-to-I editing.