Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with multiple mucosal involvement in mucous membrane pemphigoid

A systematic review on efficacy, safety and treatment durability of intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune bullous dermatoses: Special focus on indication and combination therapy

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are a group of rare blistering dermatoses of the mucous membrane and/or skin. The efficacy, safety and treatment durability of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as an alternative treatment should be explored to systematically review the available literature regarding treatment outcomes with IVIg in AIBD patients. The predefined search strategy was incorporated into the following database, MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science on 18 July 2022. Sixty studies were enrolled using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The use of IVIg alone or combined with rituximab was reported in 500 patients with pemphigus, 82 patients with bullous pemphigoid, 146 patients with mucous membranes pemphigoid and 19 patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Disease remission with IVIg therapy and RTX + IVIg combination therapy were recorded as 82.8% and 86.7% in pemphigus, 88.0% and 100% in bullous pemphigoid and 91.3% and 75.0% in mucous membrane pemphigoid, respectively. In epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, treatment with IVIg led to 78.6% disease remission; no data were available regarding the treatment with RTX + IVIg in this group of patients. Among all the included patients, 37.5% experienced at least one IVIg-related side effect; the most common ones were headaches, fever/chills and nausea/vomiting. The use of IVIg with or without rituximab had a favourable clinical response in patients with AIBDs. IVIg has no major influence on the normal immune system, which makes its utilization for patients with AIBDs reasonable.

European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I

This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono- or multisite involvement. Patients' autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the 'Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool' and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.

World Workshop of Oral Medicine VII: A systematic review of immunobiologic therapy for oral manifestations of pemphigoid and pemphigus

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence for treatment of oral involvement of pemphigus and pemphigoid with biologics.

STUDY DESIGN

This systematic review used a comprehensive search strategy to identify literature describing oral involvement of pemphigus or pemphigoid treated with a biologic agent. The primary outcome measures were efficacy and safety of biologic therapy.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 154 studies including over 1200 patients. Treatment of pemphigus with a total of 11 unique biologic agents and 3 unique combinations of agents is reported. Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included in the final analysis that investigated infliximab, IVIg, rituximab, and autologous platelet-rich plasma therapy for pemphigus vulgaris. Three non-RCT studies reported on successful rituximab or IVIg therapy for mucous membrane pemphigoid. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in agent, methods, and quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence clearly describing oral tissue response to biologic therapy is sparse. Two RCTs support use of rituximab, one supports use of IVIg, and one pilot study suggests intralesional injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma aids healing of oral PV lesions. As oral lesions of pemphigus and pemphigoid can be refractory to systemic therapy, drug trials including biologic therapies should document details regarding response of the oral lesions to therapy.

Targeted Therapies for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: Current Status

Autoimmune bullous skin disorders are rare but meaningful chronic inflammatory diseases, many of which had a poor or devastating prognosis prior to the advent of immunosuppressive drugs such as systemic corticosteroids, which down-regulate the immune pathogenesis in these disorders. Glucocorticoids and adjuvant immunosuppressive drugs have been of major benefit for the fast control of most of these disorders, but their long-term use is limited by major side effects such as blood cytopenia, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and gastrointestinal ulcers. In recent years, major efforts were made to identify key elements in the pathogenesis of autoimmune bullous disorders, leading to the identification of their autoantigens, which are mainly located in desmosomes (pemphigus) and the basement membrane zone (pemphigoids). In the majority of cases, immunoglobulin G, and to a lesser extent, immunoglobulin A autoantibodies directed against distinct cutaneous adhesion molecules are directly responsible for the loss of cell-cell and cell-basement membrane adhesion, which is clinically related to the formation of blisters and/or erosions of the skin and mucous membranes. We describe and discuss novel therapeutic strategies that directly interfere with the production and regulation of pathogenic autoantibodies (rituximab), their catabolism (intravenous immunoglobulins), and their presence in the circulation and extravascular tissues such as the skin (immunoadsorption), leading to a significant amelioration of disease. Moreover, we show that these novel therapies have pleiotropic effects on various proinflammatory cells and cytokines. Recent studies in bullous pemphigoid suggest that targeting of immunoglobulin E autoantibodies (omalizumab) may be also beneficial. In summary, the introduction of targeted therapies in pemphigus and pemphigoid holds major promise because of the high efficacy and fewer side effects compared with conventional global immunosuppressive therapy.

Spectrum of orocutaneous disease associations: Immune-mediated conditions

There are a number of diseases that manifest both on the skin and the oral mucosa, and therefore the importance for dermatologists in clinical practice to be aware of these associations is paramount. In the following continuing medical education series, we outline orocutaneous disease associations with both immunologic and inflammatory etiologies.

Shifting Focus in the Therapeutics of Immunobullous Disease

Therapeutics of autoimmune bullous disease has seen a major shift of focus from more global immunosuppression to targeted immunotherapy. Anti CD 20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab revolutionized the therapeutics of autoimmune bullous disease particularly pemphigus. Though it is still being practiced off-label, evidences in the form of RCT and meta analysis are now available. Other novel anti CD 20 monoclonal antibodies like ofatumumab, veltuzumab, and ocrelizumab, tositumomab or obinutuzumab/GA101 may add to the therapeutic options in coming days. Beyond anti CD 20 monoclonal antibodies other options that show promise at least in select scenario are omalizumab, TNF inhibitors plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. The present article will discuss the role of rituximab and other newer therapeutics in the treatment of autoimmune blistering disease, especially pemphigus and suggests their positions in the therapeutic ladder.

Paraneoplastic Pemphigus and Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Associated with Neoplasm: Characteristics, Diagnosis, Associated Neoplasms, Proposed Pathogenesis, Treatment

Autoimmune paraneoplastic and neoplasm-associated skin syndromes are characterized by autoimmune-mediated cutaneous lesions in the presence of a neoplasm. The identification of these syndromes provides information about the underlying tumor, systemic symptoms, and debilitating complications. The recognition of these syndromes is particularly helpful in cases of skin lesions presenting as the first sign of the malignancy, and the underlying malignancy can be treated in a timely manner. Autoimmune paraneoplastic and neoplasm-associated bullous skin syndromes are characterized by blister formation due to an autoimmune response to components of the epidermis or basement membrane in the context of a neoplasm. The clinical manifestations, histopathology and immunopathology findings, target antigens, associated neoplasm, current diagnostic criteria, current understanding of pathogenesis, and treatment options for a selection of four diseases are reviewed. Paraneoplastic pemphigus manifests with clinically distinct painful mucosal erosions and polymorphic cutaneous lesions, and is often associated with lymphoproliferative neoplasm. In contrast, bullous pemphigoid associated with neoplasm presents with large tense subepidermal bullae of the skin, and mild mucosal involvement, but without unique clinical features. Mucous membrane pemphigoid associated with neoplasm is a disorder of chronic subepithelial blisters that evolve into erosions and ulcerations that heal with scarring, and involves stratified squamous mucosal surfaces. Linear IgA dermatosis associated with neoplasm is characterized by annularly grouped pruritic papules, vesicles, and bullae along the extensor surfaces of elbows, knees, and buttocks. Physicians should be aware that these autoimmune paraneoplastic and neoplasm-associated syndromes can manifest distinct or similar clinical features as compared with the non-neoplastic counterparts.

Efficacy of Various Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy Protocols in Autoimmune and Chronic Inflammatory Disorders

Objective:

To determine the efficacy of various intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) protocols used in the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders.

Data Sources:

Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (November 1984–March 2007) and a search was conducted using the term intravenous immunoglobulin. References cited in the selected articles were also reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Inclusion criteria for studies were (1) English language, (2) randomized controlled trials, (3) defined protocols, (4) a minimum of 15 patients, and (5) objective criteria provided to assess clinical outcomes and course.

Data Synthesis:

The therapeutic efficacy of IVIG therapy is well established, and defined protocols exist for treatment of Kawasaki disease, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Guillain–Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, and autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases. In the absence of a defined protocol, studies have demonstrated that IVIG therapy is effective in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, dermatomyositis, stiff person syndrome, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive systemic vasculitides, Graves' ophthalmopathy, and certain forms of systemic lupus erythematosus. It might also be of benefit in some patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. The outcomes are variable in these studies. In toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens–Johnson syndrome, use of IVIG has dramatically influenced clinical response and reduced mortality.

Conclusions:

The cumulative evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes observed are significantly influenced by the use of a defined protocol. There is a need for multicenter trials approved by the Food and Drug Administration to better define the role of IVIG in many disease states. Such studies would be able to establish the indications for use, optimal dose, frequency of infusions, duration of therapy, and need for gradual withdrawal versus sudden cessation. Defined protocols resulting from the study of a large cohort of patients often convince insurance companies to create policies that provide access to IVIG therapy.

The role of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid: A review of literature

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is considered an autoimmune blistering disease that predominantly affects mucous membranes. Various treatments are available for controlling the diseases, but not all of them may respond.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for all the associated studies until 2015, using the keywords such as "cicatricial pemphigoid" or "ocular pemphigoid" or "mucous membrane pemphigoid" or "MMP" and "intravenous immunoglobulin" or "IVIg" to find all the relevant studies. The last search update was for September 2, 2015. Among the searched items, only English studies were included in the review.

RESULTS

After excluding nonrelevant studies, 13 studies with a total number of seventy patients with MMP who were under treatment with IVIg were analyzed. The 65 patients responded completely, one did not respond, two had partially responded, and the remaining two patients stopped IVIg therapy, which resulted in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid progression. Majority of the studies reported mild adverse effects while two of them did not report any unwanted side effect. The most common side effect was headache, followed by nausea. Most of the patients who had a cessation of IVIg therapy before achieving clinical remission experienced the disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Overall, it can be concluded that IVIg therapy was very helpful in treatment of MMP patients who did not respond to conventional therapy or stopped using them for various side effects. Adverse effects associated with IVIg therapy were considerably lower than conventional therapy that can lead toward treatment with this agent in patients who suffer from severe side effects.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins: Mode of Action and Indications in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Dermatoses

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), a mixture of variable amounts of proteins (albumin, IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE antibodies), as well as salt, sugar, solvents, and detergents, are successfully used to treat a variety of dermatological disorders. For decades, IVIGs have been administered for treatment of infectious diseases and immune deficiencies, since they contain natural antibodies that represent a first-line defense against pathogens. Today their indication has expanded, including the off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In dermatology, IVIGs are administered for treatment of different disorders at different therapeutic regimens, mostly with higher doses then those administered for treatment of infectious diseases. The aim of this prospective review is to highlight the indications, effectiveness, side effects, and perspectives of the systemic treatment with IVIGs for patients with severe, life-threatening, and resistant to conventional therapies autoimmune or inflammatory dermatoses.

Mucous membranepemphigoid in two half-sisters. The potential roles of autoantibodies to β4 integrin subunits and HLA-DQβ1*0301

BACKGROUND

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a subepithelial autoimmune mucocutaneous disease. It most frequently affects the oral mucosa, followed by ocular and nasal mucosa, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, skin, laryngeal and esophageal mucosa.

MAIN OBSERVATION

Two half-sisters developed mucous membrane pemphigoid at approximately the same age. The older sister presented with primarily mucosal disease, while the younger had a more cutaneous disease. The histopathology demonstrated a subepithelial blister and direct immunofluorescence showed deposition of IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone of perilesional tissues in both sisters. Antibodies to human β4 integrin were present in the sera of both patients and correlated with disease activity. Both sisters carried the same HLADQβ1* 0301 allele.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case of mucous membrane pemphigoid occurring in two half-sisters. Perhaps, it is the low incidence of mucous membrane pemphigoid that may account for the lack of reports on familial cases of the disease.

Biological agents for the treatment of uveitis

INTRODUCTION

The conventional treatment of uveitis includes corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, which are highly efficacious, but can be associated with serious systemic side effects. Over the last two decades, advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, as well as improved biotechnology, have enabled selective targeting of the chemical mediators of diseases. Recently, a new class of drugs called biologics, that target the various mediators of the inflammation cascade, may potentially provide more effective and less toxic treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This article is a review and summary of the peer-reviewed evidence for biologic agents in the treatment of various forms of ocular inflammation and it focuses on the potential use of other biologic agents that have been tested in experimental autoimmune uveitis. Pubmed was used as our main tool for our literature search. Some additional references were taken from books written on the subject.

EXPERT OPINION

There are a wide variety of new and emerging biological agents currently being used in the treatment of uveitis which has expanded the therapeutic horizons far beyond previous limitations.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: an update

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is being increasingly utilized as an off-label therapy for a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions across various specialties. Numerous reports have shown that it is an effective treatment for autoimmune skin blistering disorders. Unlike most therapies for blistering disorders, IVIg is not immunosuppressive and has a favorable side effect profile. This has allowed its use to expand dramatically over the last decade. However, due to the rarity and severity of autoimmune skin blistering diseases, well-designed prospective trials are generally lacking. This work highlights major research developments and the best evidence to date regarding the treatment of autoimmune pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, pemphigoid gestationis, and linear IgA dermatosis with IVIg, providing an update on its efficacy, proposed mechanisms of action, side effect profile, and indications for use.

The management of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus

Mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris are autoimmune blistering disorders in which many similar drugs and therapeutic strategies are utilized. In general, localized disease can be treated with topical agents. In contrast, patients with more severe and progressive disease usually require a combination of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive medications. Oral corticosteroids, adjuvant immunosuppressive agents, antibiotics such as dapsone and immunomodulatory procedures like intravenous immunoglobulin are the main therapeutic agents used in treating these two disorders. Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with these disorders are related to the sites involved and to the drugs used for therapy. Treatment should be individualized based on severity, extent, and rate of progression of disease, comorbidities, and age of the patient. Serum levels of specific autoantibodies and indirect immunofluorescence titers, in certain cases, can be used to monitor response to therapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: a review of the evidence for its efficacy and safety

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a biologic agent that is being increasingly used in the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders. It is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, Kawasaki disease, bone marrow transplantation in patients aged over 20 years, chronic B-cell lymphocytic leukemia, and pediatric AIDS. IVIg has been used off-label for several diseases, clinical symptoms and syndromes. Our aim was to determine if there is evidence to support the efficacy of IVIg therapy in autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs). We searched the PubMed database for studies on pemphigus and pemphigoid using the following criteria: (i) English language; (ii) minimum of five patients; (iii) diagnosis based on histology and immunopathology; and (iv) statistical analysis of data for comparison of efficacy provided. We evaluated the data and present information on the number of participants in each study, pre-IVIg therapy, indications for the use of IVIg, IVIg protocol (dose and interval) used, concomitant therapies, clinical outcome, follow-up period, and serologic studies. The quality of the evidence presented in this review is at Level A according to the UK National Health Service criteria. Twenty-three studies that were published between May 1999 and April 2010 were identified. One randomized controlled trial was found and all other studies were case series. Data on 260 patients treated with IVIg were analyzed: 191 patients with pemphigus and 69 patients with pemphigoid. Overall, 245 patients showed improvement with IVIg therapy. IVIg demonstrated a corticosteroid-sparing effect. In the studies presented, the incidence of serious adverse effects was not significant. The best available evidence in the literature indicates that IVIg is efficacious and has a good safety profile in the treatment of AMBDs.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in autoimmune skin blistering diseases

Treatment of autoimmune bullous skin diseases can often be challenging and primarily consists of systemic corticosteroids and a variety of immunosuppressants. Current treatment strategies are effective in most cases but hampered by the side effects of long-term immunosuppressive treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is one potential promising therapy for patients with autoimmune bullous skin diseases, and evidence of its effectiveness and safety is increasing. A number of autoimmune bullous skin diseases have been identified in which IVIG treatment may be beneficial. However, experience with IVIG in patients with autoimmune skin blistering disease is limited, where it is recommended for patients not responding to conventional therapy. The mode of action of IVIG in autoimmune diseases, including bullous diseases is far from being completely understood. We here summarize the clinical evidence supporting the notion, that IVIG is a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of patients with autoimmune bullous skin disease. In addition, we review the proposed modes of action. In the future, randomized controlled trials are necessary to better determine the efficacy and adverse effects of IVIG in the treatment of autoimmune bullous skin diseases. In addition, insights into IVIG's mode of action might enable us to develop novel therapeutics to overcome the current shortage of IVIG.

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in the elderly: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

Elderly individuals are susceptible to autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABDs), which may be associated with high morbidity and mortality. ABDs result from an autoimmune response to components of the basement membrane zone at the dermal-epidermal junction or desmosomes. Bullous pemphigoid results from autoimmunity to hemidesmosomal proteins present in the basement membrane of stratified squamous epithelia. Patients present with tense blisters in flexural areas of the skin. Mild disease may be treated with potent topical corticosteroids, while extensive disease usually requires systemic corticosteroids or systemic immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine. Mucosal pemphigoid affects one or more mucous membranes that are lined by stratified squamous epithelia. The two most commonly involved sites are the eye and the oral cavity. Lesions frequently result in scar formation that may cause blindness. Patients with severe disease or ocular involvement require aggressive therapy with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita results from autoimmunity to type VII collagen in the anchoring fibrils of the basement membrane. Lesions may either arise on an inflammatory base or be non-inflammatory and result primarily from trauma. Treatment options include corticosteroids, dapsone, ciclosporin, methotrexate and plasmapheresis/immunoapheresis. Paraneoplastic pemphigus results from autoimmunity to multiple desmosomal antigens. The disorder is associated with neoplasms, especially leukaemia, lymphoma and thymoma. Patients present with stomatitis and polymorphous skin eruption. The disease may respond to successful treatment of the underlying neoplasm or may require immunosuppressive therapy.

Oral mucosal diseases: Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Subepithelial vesiculobullous conditions are chronic autoimmune disorders that arise from reactions directed against components of the hemidesmosomes or basement membrane zones (BMZ) of stratified squamous epithelium to which the term immune-mediated subepithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has been given. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the most common, but variants do exist. Non-immune disorders that involve these epithelial components typically have a genetic basis--the main example being epidermolysis bullosa. All subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders present as blisters and erosions, and diagnosis must be confirmed by biopsy examination with immunostaining, sometimes supplemented by other investigations. No single treatment reliably controls all subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders; the immunological differences within IMSEBD may account for differences in responses to treatment. Currently, as well as improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory treatment is used to control the oral lesions of MMP, but it is not known if its specific subsets reliably respond to different agents.

The use of i.v. IG therapy in dermatology

The intravenous administration of exogenous pooled human immunoglobulin (i.v. IG) was originally licensed as antibody replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies and there are currently six FDA-approved uses for this agent. Despite a current lack of FDA approval, off-label treatment of a multitude of dermatologic disorders with i.v. IG has shown exciting potential for this unique treatment modality. The diseases successfully treated with i.v. IG include autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, vasculitides, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and infectious disorders (such as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome). Currently the biggest drawback in the consideration of i.v. IG therapy in dermatologic disorders is the lack of randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, there is a significant body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of i.v. IG in patients with dermatologic disorders that are resistant to treatment with standard agents. In summary, i.v. IG constitutes a valuable and potentially life-saving agent in managing patients with a variety of dermatologic disorders under the appropriate circumstances.

Human immunoglobulins in intraocular inflammation

Chronic intraocular inflammation (IOI) is a heterogeneous group of rare diseases, which represents one of the leading causes of acquired and treatable blindness in adults. The main anatomical site of inflammation is the uveal tract, which is the vascular organ of the eye, but uveitis is now used to describe IOI more globally. In around 40% of the cases of uveitis an underlying systemic disease, often of autoimmune origin, can be identified. In autoimmune diseases with IOI, uveitis may be the first clinical manifestation and may represent the most severe sign. Studies in animal models, especially in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), offer the opportunity to investigate the pathogenicity of these disorders. The conventional treatment of IOI includes corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, which are efficient in around one-half of the patients, but their effectiveness is also limited by their iatrogenicity. The effects of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) on ocular inflammation have been investigated in a wide spectrum of autoimmune/systemic diseases. Most of the publications are case series or open trials. They show favorable results in a subset of indications, including mainly ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome, or birdshot disease. Efficacy results are more debated in other conditions such as inflammatory demyelinating optic neuritis. In other diseases with IOI only case reports are available, suggesting that IVIGs may be of some interest. These observations support the need for controlled trials to demonstrate the efficacy of IVIGs and assess their potential steroid-sparing effect.

Canadian consensus statement on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in dermatology

BACKGROUND

As a safe, well-tolerated, and potentially beneficial therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been increasingly used by dermatologists to treat immune-mediated skin disease. However, practical and comprehensive guidelines for the use of IVIG have yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

To develop the first Canadian consensus statement on the use of IVIG therapy in skin disease.

METHODS

A group of Canadian dermatologists convened to discuss current issues in IVIG therapy. The participants reviewed and evaluated the literature and shared clinical experience. Using a modified Delphi process, a consensus statement was developed.

RESULTS

Herein we provide a brief overview of pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Recommendations for the management of these diseases are detailed, and therapeutic algorithms for the treatment of various autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases are presented. The appropriate use of IVIG therapy is placed in context for each disease.

CONCLUSION

Although preliminary data suggest that IVIG is a safe and effective therapy for many skin disorders, uncontrolled clinical trials, case series, and anecdotal case reports dominate the literature. Collaborative randomized controlled trials are required to firmly establish the role of IVIG in dermatology.

Therapy of autoimmune bullous diseases

Autoimmune bullous diseases result from an immune response to molecular components of the desmosome or basement membrane. Bullous diseases are associated with a high degree of morbidity and occasional mortality. Therapy of bullous diseases consists of suppressing the immune system, controlling inflammation and improving healing of erosions. The therapeutic agents used in the treatment of bullous diseases may be associated with high morbidity and occasional mortality. Successful treatment requires understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process and the pharmacology of the drugs being used.

Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: Interferon and intravenous immunoglobulin (Part 1 of 2)

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include interferons, intravenous immunoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab, alefacept, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of these medications. However, numerous off-label uses have evolved. As part 1 of a 2-part series, this article will review the literature regarding the off-label uses of the interferons and intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.

Variations in serum hemoglobin, albumin, and electrolytes in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a real clinical threat?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a solution of globulins containing antibodies derived from pooled human plasma of donors and used in the treatment of a number of immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases. However, several investigators have reported biochemical alterations with use of IVIg. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of IVIg therapy on selected biochemical and hematologic parameters in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs).

METHODS

In this preliminary clinical study, ten patients with AMBDs (seven with pemphigus vulgaris and three with mucous membrane pemphigoid) received 133 cycles of IVIg for a total of 399 infusions. We evaluated the effects of IVIg therapy on serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, and electrolyte levels, including sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-) and calcium (Ca2+). Values of these parameters were measured 24 hours before, during, and 24 hours and 4 weeks after the 3-day infusion period.

RESULTS

The observed variations in serum electrolyte levels were physiologically and clinically negligible. Furthermore, 24 hours after the last infusion, mean electrolyte values had spontaneously returned to normal levels without the need for additional supplementation: Na+ 137.59+/-1.42 mmol/L (p=0.6091 vs baseline); K+ 3.97+/-0.5 mmol/L (p=0.2689); Cl- 103.4+/-2.69 mmol/L (p=0.0388); and Ca2+ 9.07+/-0.44 mg/dL (p=0.5332). Conversely, significant variations in mean Hb and albumin levels were observed. When measured 24 hours after the last infusion, mild/moderate decreases in Hb (11.62+/-2.12 g/dL; p=0.009 vs baseline) and/or albumin (mean 3.14+/-0.24 g/dL; p=0.0016 vs baseline) were evident. Such changes may, albeit very rarely, be of sufficient clinical significance in individual patients as to necessitate additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving intravenous IVIg for AMBDs, electrolyte values should be monitored but do not represent a real clinical threat. Hemoglobin and albumin values may be altered sufficiently to require additional treatment but this is a very rare occurrence. These findings confirm and extend previous reports of the safety of IVIg therapy.

Off-Label Uses of Biologic Agents in Dermatology: A 2006 Update

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include adalimumab, alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, IVIg, omalizumab, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the indications of these medications that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration; however, numerous off-label uses have evolved. To update the reader on more recent uses of the biologics for off-label dermatologic use, this article will emphasize more recent published data from 2005 through the date of submission in May 2006.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in autoimmune blistering diseases

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBD) are an interesting group of rare diseases that affect the mucous membranes and the skin and are frequently or potentially fatal. The clinical presentation is significantly variable, as is the course and prognosis. The immunopathology is well characterized and the target antigens to which the autoantibodies are directed have been studied by various investigators. A significant majority of the patients respond to conventional therapy, which consists of high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This treatment program has significantly improved the prognosis in many patients. In such patients, significant side effects of the drugs may appear and produce a very poor quality of life. In patients with progressive diseases, especially those with mucous membrane pemphigoid, the significant sequela; such as blindness, aphonia, and stenosis of the anal and vaginal canals can occur. In several patients treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy, death occurs as a consequence of prolonged immune suppression leading to opportunistic infections. In this manuscript, the published data on the use of immunoglobulins intravenous (IGIV) in patients with AMBD is presented. The most important features of IGIV in patients with AMBD are: 1) the ability to clinically control the disease; 2) the ability to induce and maintain a long-term clinical remission; 3) a lower incidence of side effects; and 4) a higher quality of life. The important characteristic of the IGIV therapy in the AMBD is two-fold. First, the therapy, when given according to a published protocol, produces a lasting and long-term clinical remission, rather than a temporary arrest of the disease. Second, the therapy, as described in the protocol, has a very definitive endpoint. Consequently, once the patients are treated and go into long-term remission, the therapy is no longer required. The significant positive results obtained with IGIV are to a large extent also due to the associated aggressive topical therapy that was used and the frequent use of sublesional injections with triamcinolone. The rapid and early detection of cutaneous and mucosal infections and their treatment with systemic antibiotics is also a very important feature of IGIV therapy. When patients are under long-term conventional therapy, the infections are often not detected because they lack the ability to mount signs of inflammation. It is also becoming increasingly clear for patients to have a successful outcome, in treatment with IGIV therapy, it is critical that the physician spends a significant amount of time with each patient, monitor the therapy closely, and be familiar with the overall health of the patient. It is also best if the therapies are instituted by a physician who has significant interest and experience in blistering diseases and IGIV therapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in eye involvement

Ocular inflammation may affect all eye layers: conjunctiva, sclera, uvea, and orbital tissues. The main eye involvement requiring a systemic treatment is uveitis, which represents a heterogeneous group of rare diseases, most of which are sight-threatening. In around 40% of uveitis cases an underlying systemic disease, often of autoimmune origin, can be identified. In autoimmune diseases with intraocular inflammation (IOI), uveitis may be the first clinical manifestation and may represent the most severe sign. Studies in animal models, especially in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), offer the opportunity to investigate the pathogenicity of these disorders. The conventional treatment of IOI includes corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, which are efficient in around one-half of the patients; however, their effectiveness is also limited by their iatrogenicity. The effects of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) on ocular inflammation have been investigated in a wide spectrum of autoimmune/systemic diseases. Most publications are case series or open trials. They show favorable results in a subset of indications including mainly ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, or birdshot disease. Efficacy results are more debated in other conditions, such as inflammatory demyelinating optic neuritis. In other diseases with IOI (Wegener disease, Behcet's disease, inflammatory myositis), only case reports are available, suggesting that IVIg may be of some interest. These observations support the need for controlled trials to demonstrate the efficacy of IVIg and assess their potential steroid-sparing effect.

Comparison of cost of immune globulin intravenous therapy to conventional immunosuppressive therapy in treating patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBD) are a group of potentially fatal diseases that affect the skin and mucous membranes. AMBD have different target antigens as well as variable clinical presentation, course, and prognosis. The mainstay of conventional immunosuppressive therapy (CIST) for AMBD is long-term high-dose systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Such therapy has proven effective in many patients; however, in some patients, the disease continues to progress with significant sequelae such as blindness, loss of voice, anal, and vaginal stenosis which causes poor quality of life. Furthermore, the CIST may have some serious side effects including opportunistic infections which may cause death. Immune globulin intravenous (IGIV) therapy has been reportedly used in the management of patients with AMBD refractory to CIST. IGIV has shown to be more clinically beneficial than CIST by bringing about long-term clinical remission and less recurrence. The high cost of the IGIV is of concern to patients, physicians, and insurance companies. In this report, we compare the cost of IGIV to that of CIST in treating a cohort of 15 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), 10 ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), 15 bullous pemphigoid (BP), and 32 pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients. In each cohort of patients, CIST had significant side effects, many of which were hazardous and required prolonged and frequent hospitalizations. Some of these side effects were severe enough to require discontinuation of the treatment. We consider the total cost of CIST to be the actual cost of the drug, plus the cost of management of the side effects produced by CIST. In the same patient cohort, no significant side effects to IGIV were observed. None of the IGIV treated patients required physician visits, laboratory tests, or hospitalizations specifically related to IGIV therapy. Hence, the total cost of the IGIV therapy is the actual cost of the IGIV only. The mean total cost of treatment of IGIV therapy is statistically significantly less than that of CIST during the entire course of the disease and on an annual basis. In conclusion, IGIV therapy is a safe, clinically beneficial, and a cost effective alternative treatment in patients with AMBD, non-responsive to CIST.

Cost of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy Versus Conventional Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is an expensive biologic agent used to treat patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (CIST). The high cost of IVIG is of concern to healthcare providers and insurance companies.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost of IVIG with that of CIST in treating a cohort of 15 patients with severe and extensive MMP.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with biopsy-proven MMP nonresponsive to CIST were subsequently treated with IVIG and demonstrated a positive clinical response. This was a comparative, retrospective study; the mean total duration of the observation period was 8.4 years. A comparison of the cost of IVIG with that of CIST during the study period and the annual cost was performed. The cost of CIST was defined as the actual cost of the drug plus the cost of management of the multiple adverse effects, including hospitalizations, produced by CIST. In the same patient cohort, no significant adverse effects to IVIG were observed and no hospitalizations were required. Hence, the cost of IVIG therapy is simply the actual cost of the IVIG.

RESULTS

In this cohort of patients, CIST had significant adverse effects, many of which were hazardous and required prolonged and frequent hospitalizations. The mean total cost using IVIG therapy was significantly less than that of CIST during the entire course of the disease (p < 0.001) and on an annual basis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IVIG therapy is a safe, clinically beneficial, and less-expensive alternative treatment in patients with progressive MMP that is nonresponsive to CIST.

Number III Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorder. It is now quite evident that a number of sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorders may produce similar clinical pictures, and also that a range of variants of MMP exist, with antibodies directed against various hemidesmosomal components or components of the epithelial basement membrane. The term immune-mediated sub-epithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has therefore been used. Immunological differences may account for the significant differences in their clinical presentation and responses to therapy, but unfortunately data on this are few. The diagnosis and management of IMSEBD on clinical grounds alone is impossible and a full history, general, and oral examination, and biopsy with immunostaining are now invariably required, sometimes supplemented with other investigations. No single treatment regimen reliably controls all these disorders, and it is not known if the specific subsets of MMP will respond to different drugs. Currently, apart from improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory-especially immunosuppressive-therapy is typically used to control oral lesions. The present paper reviews pemphigoid, describing the present understanding of this fascinating clinical phenotype, summarising the increasing number of subsets with sometimes-different natural histories and immunological features, and outlining current clinical practice.

Effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for skin disease other than toxic epidermal necrolysis: a retrospective review of Mayo Clinic experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine retrospectively the use and effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment of various skin diseases, primarily immunobullous disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients who had received IVIg therapy for skin disease between 1996 and 2003 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, Scottsdale, Ariz, and Jacksonville, Fla, and retrospectively reviewed their medical records.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated with IVIg for various skin diseases: immunobullous disease in 11 adults (pemphigus vulgaris [7 patients], bullous pemphigold [3], and cicatricial pemphigoid [1]); dermatomyositis (2); mixed connective tissue disease (1); chronic urticaria (1); scleromyxedema (1); leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1); and linear IgA bullous disease (1). Responses of patients by type of disease were as follows: pemphigus vulgaris, 1 partial response (PR) and 6 no response (NR); bullous pemphigoid, 1 complete response (CR) and 2 NR; cicatricial pemphigoid, 1 NR; dermatomyositis, 1 CR and 1 PR; mixed connective tissue disease, 1 CR; chronic urticaria, 1 CR; scleromyxedema, 1 CR; leukocytoclastic vasculitis, 1 PR; and linear IgA bullous disease, 1 CR. Six patients (33%) experienced CR, 3 (17%) had PR, and 9 (50%) had NR to IVIg therapy. All 9 nonresponders were adult patients with immunobullous disease.

CONCLUSION

Although this was a retrospective study of a small cohort of a mixture of patients, the findings emphasize that our experience with IVIg treatment for skin disease, particularly immunobullous disease, is less favorable than that reported previously. Further studies are needed to verify the efficacy of IVIg for skin disease.

Management of autoimmune bullous diseases: Pharmacology and therapeutics

Bullous diseases are associated with high morbidity and mortality. They result from autoimmune response to one or more components of the basement membrane or desmosomes. Management consists of treating the immunologic basis of the disease, treating the inflammatory process involved in lesion formation, and providing supportive care both locally and systemically. Therapeutic agents are chosen based on their known pharmacologic properties and evidence of effectiveness derived from observations and studies. Learning objectives At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be able to understand the pharmacology of drugs used in the treatment of bullous diseases, the principles of therapy for various such diseases, and a practical approach to the management of these diseases.

Profile of autoantibody to basement membrane zone proteins in patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid: long-term follow up and influence of therapy

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease characterized by autoantibodies to components within the basement membrane zone. In this study, we report the titers of autoantibodies to antigens in the BMZ, in the sera of 13 patients, treated with intravenous immunoglobulin as monotherapy over a consecutive 18-month period. Using bovine gingiva lysate as substrate in an immunoblot assay, autoantibodies to human bullous pemphigoid antigens (BPAg1 and BPAg2), human beta4 integrin, and laminin 5 were measured. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) decline in the autoantibody titers to beta4-integrin was observed after 3.42 months of initiating the IVIg therapy. These titers were undetectable after 13 months of therapy. The titers of antibodies to BPAg1 and BPAg2 did not correlate with disease activity or response to therapy. Antibodies to laminins were not detected. In patients with MMP, autoantibody titers to beta4-integrin correlate with disease activity and response to therapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with Ocular–Cicatricial pemphigoid

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical outcome and long-term follow-up of 10 patients with progressive ocular-cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), nonresponsive to conventional therapy and treated with IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, reported earlier as a preliminary study.

DESIGN

Noncomparative, prospective, interventional case series according to a defined protocol for IVIg therapy.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten patients, with a diagnosis of OCP present bilaterally confirmed by both biopsy and immunofluorescence studies and who had failed conventional therapy and had objectively demonstrated a positive response to IVIg therapy in a preliminary study, published in 1999.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of objective clinical outcome parameters before and after IVIg therapy, including visual acuity (VA) and prevention of progression of subepithelial conjunctival fibrosis and blindness.

RESULTS

All 10 patients initially demonstrated signs of clinical improvement with IVIg therapy. The total number of IVIg cycles ranged from 20 to 42 (mean, 32), and the total duration of IVIg therapy ranged from 25 to 43 months (mean, 35). Eight patients who completed the protocol had an improvement in their VA and did not have further progression of subepithelial conjunctival fibrosis. These 8 patients have been maintained in a sustained remission for a total follow-up period ranging from 24 to 48 months (mean, 35) after the discontinuation of IVIg therapy. Two patients did not complete the protocol. Both had initially demonstrated a positive clinical response. One patient had worsening of the OCP and, after IVIg therapy, was abruptly and involuntarily withdrawn. In the second patient, deterioration occurred after ocular surgery. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was not provided postoperatively. These 2 patients who did not complete the protocol lost vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is an effective treatment in OCP in patients nonresponsive to conventional therapy. In 8 patients who completed the protocol, progression of the disease was not observed. A gradual withdrawal of IVIg therapy, as described in the protocol, may be beneficial in maintaining a sustained clinical remission. Abrupt cessation or discontinuation can result in a severe recurrence that may possibly progress to blindness.

Blistering disorders: diagnosis and treatment

Blistering diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that can affect either skin and mucous membrane, or both, varying in presentation, clinical course, pathohistology, immunopathology and treatment. Not infrequently the diagnosis is delayed. This can result in severe, and sometimes fatal consequences. Although these diseases are rare, it is very important to make an accurate diagnosis based on a combination of clinical profile and laboratory observations. A brief review is presented of the following bullous diseases: pemphigus, paraneoplastic pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, dermatitis herpetiformis, linear IgA bullous disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, and subcorneal pustular dermatitis. Their clinical, pathohistologic and immunopathologic features and recommendations for therapy are discussed.

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in the elderly: diagnosis and management

Elderly individuals are susceptible to autoimmune bullous dermatoses (in particular, pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and paraneoplastic pemphigus). Bullous dermatoses are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Bullous dermatoses result from autoimmune responses to one or more components of the basement membrane or desmosomes. Pemphigoid results from autoimmunity to hemidesmosomal proteins present in the basement membrane of stratified squamous epithelia. Patients present with tense blisters in flexural areas of the skin. Mild or moderate bullous pemphigoid may be treated with potent topical corticosteroids while extensive disease usually requires systemic corticosteroids or systemic immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine. Mucosal pemphigoid affects one or more mucous membranes that are lined by stratified squamous epithelia. The two most commonly involved sites are the eye and the oral cavity. Lesions frequently result in scar formation, which may cause blindness. Patients with severe disease or ocular involvement require aggressive therapy with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita results from autoimmunity to type VII collagen in the anchoring fibrils of the basement membrane area. Lesions may either arise on an inflammatory base or be non-inflammatory and result primarily from trauma. The inflammatory type of the disease is more responsive to therapy than the non-inflammatory type. Treatment options include corticosteroids, dapsone, cyclosporin, plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin G. Paraneoplastic pemphigus results from autoimmunity to multiple antigens within the desmosomes. The disorder is associated with neoplasms, especially leukaemia and lymphoma. Patients present with severe stomatitis and polymorphous skin eruption. The mucosal and cutaneous involvement may respond to successful treatment of the underlying neoplasm or may require immunosuppressive therapy.

Treatment of oral pemphigoid with intravenous immunoglobulin as monotherapy. Long-term follow-up: influence of treatment on antibody titres to human alpha6 integrin

SUMMARY

Oral pemphigoid (OP) is a chronic autoimmune disease, involving the oral cavity, characterized by a homogenous linear deposition of immunoglobulins, complement, or both along the basement membrane zone (BMZ) and a subepithelial blister formation. The alpha6/beta4 heterodimer is an integrin family of adhesion receptors, which mediates basal cell to matrix interactions. Recent evidence suggests a pathophysiologic role for antibodies against human alpha6 integrin in blister formation in OP, in organ culture studies. Fifty percent of OP patients have been reported to experience disease progression to involve other mucosal tissues, including the eye and larynx. To prevent this extension of disease, systemic therapy with systemic corticosteroids, dapsone, and immunosuppressive agents has been recommended. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the treatment of pemphigoid has been recently described. In this study, we present the use of IVIg, in a group of seven patients, with severe OP, in whom systemic conventional treatment was contraindicated. To determine the influence of treatment on antibodies to human alpha6 integrin in OP, seven patients with OP treated with IVIg therapy and a comparable control group of seven patients with OP, treated with conventional therapy, were evaluated at monthly intervals, for a 12 consecutive month treatment period. An effective clinical response was observed in all seven patients treated with IVIg therapy, after a mean treatment period of 4.5 months. IVIg therapy induced a prolonged and sustained clinical remission in all seven patients after a mean treatment period of 26.9 months. A statistically significant difference was observed in the quality of life pre- and post-IVIg therapy (P < 0.001). Both the study and the control groups had a very similar initial serological response to treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the antibody titres was observed after four months of treatment, in both groups (P = 0.015). Thereafter, patients treated with IVIg therapy had a faster rate of decline in the antibody titres, and the difference in the rate of decline between the study and control groups became statistically significant after six months of treatment (P = 0.03). The use of IVIg therapy resulted in reduction of antialpha6 antibody titres and in inducing and maintaining both a sustained, clinical and serological remission.