Prospective randomized trial of two different immunoadsorbers in severe systemic lupus erythematosus

The development of immunosorbents for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus via hemoperfusion

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease (AID) that involves multiple organ systems and is characterized by elevated levels of autoantibodies (ANA) and immune complexes. The immunoadsorption technique uses an extracorporeal clearance process to remove pathogenic toxins from patients' blood and alleviate disease symptoms. An immunosorbent is a key component of the immunoadsorption system that determines therapeutic efficacy and safety. Immunosorbents are prepared by immobilizing antibodies, antigens, or ligands with specific physicochemical affinities on a supporting matrix. Immunosorbents and pathogenic toxins bind via affinity adsorption, which involves electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and van der Waals forces. Immunosorbents are classified on the basis of their interaction mechanism with toxins into three categories: non-selective, semi-selective, and highly selective. This review aimed to summarize the current status of various commercial immunosorbents that are used to treat SLE. Moreover, recent developments in immunosorbents have heightened the need for a brief discussion about specific ligands and a supporting matrix.

Therapeutic apheresis in kidney diseases: an updated review

Besides conventional medical therapies, therapeutic apheresis has become an important adjunctive or alternative therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents for primary or secondary kidney diseases and kidney transplantation. The available therapeutic apheresis techniques used in kidney diseases, including plasma exchange, double-filtration plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, and low-density lipoprotein apheresis. Plasma exchange is still the leading extracorporeal therapy. Recently, growing evidence supports the potential benefits of double-filtration plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption for more specific and effective clearance of pathogenic antibodies with fewer side effects. However, more randomized controlled trials are still needed. Low-density lipoprotein apheresis is also an important supplementary therapy used in patients with recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. This review collects the latest evidence from recent studies, focuses on the specific advantages and disadvantages of these techniques, and compares the discrepancy among them to determine the optimal therapeutic regimens for certain kidney diseases.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Increased frequency of GM-CSF secreting PBMC in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus can be reduced by immunoadsorption

An objective was to determine the frequency of GM-CSF secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and their relation to other cytokine secreting PBMC, activation markers on lymphocytes/monocytes, clinical manifestations and anti- dsDNA antibodies.A second objectivewas to further investigatethe influence of immunoadsorption(IA) therapy on these parameters.The number of GM-CSF, interleukin-1b (IL-1b), IL-6, interferon-g (INF-g) or tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) secreting PBMC was assessed by ELISPOT assay in 10 patients with active SLE. Further, the expression of activation markers on lymphocytes and monocytes was determined by flow cytometry. Three courses of IA were performed in the patients. Seventeen healthy, age- and sex-matched volunteers served as controls. GM-CSF secreting PBMC were significantly increased whereas INF-g secreting cells were decreased in SLE patients. The expression of CD71 (transferrin receptor) on CD4 + T-cells and of the costimulatorymolecule CD86 on B-lymphocyteswas significantly increased in SLE patients. GM-CSF secreting PBMC and CD4 + /CD71 + T-cells correlated with anti-dsDNA antibody titres and decreased towards levels of controls during IA. Disease activity and anti-dsDNA autoantibody titres were significantly reduced after the treatment. Our results demonstrate significant alterations of cellular and humoral immunity in SLE patients. The impaired immunity can be modulated by IA. Thus IA may prove an immunomodulatory therapeutic option in addition to the mere depletion of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies.

[Clinical practice guidelines for systemic lupus erythematosus: Recommendations for general clinical management]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex rheumatic multisystemic disease of autoimmune origin with significant potential morbidity and mortality. It is one of the most common autoimmune diseases with an estimated prevalence of 20-150 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The clinical spectrum of SLE is wide and variable both in clinical manifestations and severity. This prompted the Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality to promote and fund the development of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the clinical care of SLE patients within the Programme of CPG in the National Health System which coordinates GuiaSalud. This CPG is is intended as the reference tool in the Spanish National Health System in order to support the comprehensive clinical management of people with SLE by all health professionals involved, regardless of specialty and level of care, helping to standardize and improve the quality of clinical decisions in our context in order to improve the health outcomes of the people affected. The purpose of this document is to present and discuss the rationale of the recommendations on the general management of SLE, specifically, clinical follow-up, general therapeutic approach, healthy lifestyles, photoprotection, and training programmes for patients. These recommendations are based on the best available scientific evidence, on discussion and the consensus of expert groups.

Efficacy of plasma exchange and immunoadsorption in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

Extracorporeal treatments have been used since the 1970s in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of standard of care (SOC) combined with plasma exchange against SOC alone in patients with lupus nephritis revealed no difference in terms of renal outcome. Subsequently, initial expectations have been dampened and further experience with plasma exchange is mainly limited to observational studies and single case reports. Beneficial effects have been reported in patients with refractory disease course or in pregnancy with prior complications due to SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome. A more specific form of extracorporeal treatment, immunoadsorption (IAS), has emerged as a valuable option in the treatment of SLE. In line with the plasma exchange experience, IAS seems to have beneficial effects in patients with refractory disease, contraindications to standard immunosuppression or during pregnancy. The mechanism IAS relates to autoantibody removal but for plasma exchange removal of activated complement components, coagulation factors, cytokines and microparticles may also be relevant. Both treatment forms have good safety profiles although reactions to blood product replacement in plasma exchange and procedure related complications such as bleeding or catheter-related infections have occurred. There is a need to more clearly define the clinical utility of plasma exchange and IAS in refractory lupus and APS subgroups.

Immunoadsorption (IAS) for systemic lupus erythematosus

Immunoadsorption (IAS) is used as a rescue therapy in severely ill SLE patients who are refractory to conventional therapies. This extracorporeal method aims at the rapid and extensive removal of pathogenic immunocomplexes (ICs) and (auto-)antibodies (Abs). Although past data have shown short- to mid-term efficacy and biocompatibility of IAS in (renal) SLE, it is still an experimental and rather expensive procedure – and evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking. Nevertheless, IAS is successfully used in life-threatening situations because of its fast mode of action and its acceptable safety profile.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which patients develop autoantibodies to DNA, histones, and often to neutrophil proteins. These form immune complexes that are pathogenic and may cause lupus nephritis. In SLE patients, infections can initiate flares and are a major cause of mortality. Neutrophils respond to infections and release extracellular traps (NETs), which are antimicrobial and are made of DNA, histones, and neutrophil proteins. The timely removal of NETs may be crucial for tissue homeostasis to avoid presentation of self-antigens. We tested the hypothesis that SLE patients cannot clear NETs, contributing to the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Here we show that serum endonuclease DNase1 is essential for disassembly of NETs. Interestingly, a subset of SLE patients' sera degraded NETs poorly. Two mechanisms caused this impaired NET degradation: (i) the presence of DNase1 inhibitors or (ii) anti-NET antibodies prevented DNase1 access to NETs. Impairment of DNase1 function and failure to dismantle NETs correlated with kidney involvement. Hence, identification of SLE patients who cannot dismantle NETs might be a useful indicator of renal involvement. Moreover, NETs might represent a therapeutic target in SLE.

Learning from past mistakes: assessing trial quality, power and eligibility in non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the post hoc study power of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the treatment of non-renal SLE and to determine the generalizability of these RCTs using an SLE database.

METHODS

RCTs in non-renal SLE were identified using PubMed (1975-2007). Inclusion/exclusion criteria, trial quality (5-point scale) and results of each study were recorded. The inclusion/exclusion criteria were compared with an SLE database to determine the proportion of patients from the database who would theoretically be eligible for these trials. For each negative study, we calculated the post hoc study power. We also looked for temporal improvements of trials in the literature and examined if pharmaceutical involvement influenced trial quality.

RESULTS

Sixty-four articles were included; the mean power of 30 negative studies was 24.6 +/- s.e.m. 3.9% (range 2.5-81.1%). Only one study had a power > 80%. Overall, potential eligibility of SLE patients in the database was 45.1 +/- s.e.m. 3.6%. Only 14 studies (21.9%) were of good quality. Fortunately, RCT quality is improving over time (trials <1995, compared with 1996-2002 and >2003; P < 0.001). Trials with pharmaceutical involvement had a significantly higher number of enrollees and better study quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative RCTs in SLE were mostly underpowered but the generalizability of these trials was high. Determination of study power and the impact of eligibility criteria on generalizability of study results are crucial in the design of clinical trials to ensure applicability to clinical practice.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American society for apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. This elaborate process had been undertaken every 7 years resulting in three prior publications in 1986, 1993, and 2000 of "The ASFA Special Issues." This article is the integral part of the Fourth ASFA Special Issue. The Fourth ASFA Special Issue is significantly modified in comparison to the previous editions. A new concept of a fact sheet has been introduced. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. A detailed description of the fact sheet is provided. The article consists of 53 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA. Categories I, II, and III are defined as previously in the Third Special Issue. However, a few new therapeutic apheresis modalities, not yet approved in the United States or are currently in clinical trials, have been assigned category P (pending) by the ASFA Clinical Categories Subcommittee. The diseases assigned to category IV are discussed in a separate article in this issue.

Immunoadsorption Plasmapheresis Using a Phenylalanine Column as an Effective Treatment for Lupus Nephritis

Immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IAPP) is effective for eliminating pathogenic molecules such as anti-DNA antibody (anti-DNA Ab) and immune complexes from the serum of patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. The purpose of this study was to assess patients with lupus nephritis (LN) treated by IAPP using a phenylalanine column and determine its efficacy with respect to conventional therapies. Six patients (M = 1, F = 5) with histologically proven LN associated with proteinuria and abnormal sedimentation on urinalysis were the subjects for this study. All were treated with oral corticosteroid (prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day) and IAPP (Immusorba PH - 350; 2 L of plasma twice weekly for 2 weeks). Serum anti-DNA Ab and complement, urinary protein, and creatinine clearance were measured over 6 weeks (pretreatment, before and after each of 2 IAPP sessions, and 1 and 4 weeks after the second IAPP session). Clinical efficacy of IAPP was compared with conventional pharmacotherapy regimes by conducting a retrospective review of 23 LN patients treated at our hospital using corticosteroid pulse therapy (CSPT, N = 7, intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 3 days), intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (IVCY, N = 7), or corticosteroid monotherapy (CSMT, N = 9, oral prednisone 1 mg/kg body weight daily, for 4 weeks). Immunosuppressants and anticoagulants were not used. With IAPP, mean urinary protein excretion decreased from 2.2 +/- 1.7 g/day pretreatment to 0.4 +/- 0.6 g/day post-treatment (P < 0.001). Mean serum anti-DNA Ab also decreased from 84.0 +/- 88.1 U/mL pretreatment to 5.8 +/- 5.5 U/mL post-treatment (P < 0.05). In combination with corticosteroid therapy, IAPP would appear to be an effective and safe treatment for LN.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

IgG immunoadsorption reduces systemic lupus erythematosus activity and proteinuria: a long term observational study

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the effects of rigorous immunoglobulin removal by immunoadsorption (IAS) on proteinuria (primary outcome variable), disease activity (SIS, SLEDAI, ECLAM), and autoantibodies to double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

16 patients with severe SLE and renal disease, in whom cyclophosphamide was contraindicated or failed to halt disease progression, were treated with IAS for 3 months. Patients achieving at least 20% improvement in two or more of the outcome measures were considered responders and offered a 9 months' extension period.

RESULTS

Within 3 months, 14 patients responded and 11 opted for an extension. Proteinuria decreased from 6.7 (4.6) g/day (mean (SD)) at baseline to 4.3 (3.5) g/day at 3 months and 2.9 (2.4) g/day at 12 months (p<0.001). From baseline to 3 and 12 months, disease activity improved independently of scoring by SIS (15 (5) to 5 (2) and to 5 (2), p<0.0001), SLEDAI (21 (7) to 5 (4) and to 5 (4), p<0.0001), or ECLAM (7 (2) to 2 (1) and to 3 (1), p<0.0001). Anti-dsDNA fell from 391 (647) IU/ml to 146 (218) and to 53 (50) IU/ml at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Steroids could be tapered from 117 (159) mg/day at baseline to 29 (17) mg/day at 3 months and 9 (2) mg/day at 12 months. IAS was not associated with an excess of infections. However, one patient died of septicaemia after 1 month of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this negatively selected cohort of patients with SLE, IAS was associated with a significant response shown by reduced proteinuria, improved global disease activity, decreased anti-dsDNA, and lower glucocorticoid dosages, suggesting therapeutic benefit.

Are better endpoints and better design of clinical trials needed?

For the clinician it is important to know whether a new drug works, and how the new drug performs against other drugs. However, new drugs are typically tested in placebo-controlled trials without active comparison. New drugs are often tested in a population with high levels of disease activity. Clinicians, however, may also seek the optimal treatment for patients with persistent moderate levels of disease activity. An answer may come from clinical trials that compare two effective drugs in patients with moderate disease activity. A main consequence, however, is that trial endpoints are needed that can detect small but relevant differences in efficacy. An ideal endpoint for trials in rheumatic diseases may be a marker that continually follows short-term changes in the disease process. The levels of the marker should be strongly associated with long-term outcome, thus prognosticating the future. When it can be measured truly and feasible, the marker would be useful as an endpoint in trials and for supporting treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Development of an in vitro miniature model to simulate immunoadsorption in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

In SLE, immunoadsorption is used as an adjuvant therapy; however, adsorption profiles and binding mechanisms have not yet been completely investigated. Using a minicolumn filled with the sorbent IMPH with or without the ligand phenylalanine, we developed a model simulating clinical conditions in a reduced scale with a constant ratio of plasma to column volume and a constant plasma flow at room temperature. By desorbing the column, the adsorption efficacy for different antibodies could be measured directly. We demonstrate that the adsorption rate can be increased by a low plasma flow and by covering the column surface. Double perfusion of the same column did not increase the amount of adsorbed antibodies. We further demonstrate that the carrier material without a ligand is unable to bind antibodies or protein. In the IMPH sorbent anti-dsDNA antibodies were significantly better adsorbed than total IgG or total protein. After a single perfusion of 21 samples, we estimated a mean anti-dsDNA antibody adsorption rate of 22.5% (+/-13.6). A group of ten responders with a medium adsorption rate of 35.4% (+/-6.5) clearly differed from a second group of eleven nonresponders (10.9% +/- 4.2). Anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACA) were adsorbed in a wide range (IgG type, 2.5-52.7%, IgM type, 1.1-37.8%) while anti-Ro (SSA) antibody adsorption was negligible. This in vitro minimodel provides a precise simulation of therapeutic immunoadsorption and helps to analyze the binding characteristics of the sorbent IMPH and shows its effectiveness in several antibody subsets of different patients.

Lowering anti-dsDNA antibodies--what's new?

Antibodies to dsDNA are specific to SLE and are pathogenic, both due to their ability to deposit in tissues through a variety of mechanisms, and to their ability, when present in immune complexes, to activate inflammatory cells. The relationship of serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels to disease activity is a complex one and the factors that determine whether or not such antibodies will be pathogenic in an individual SLE patient are incompletely understood. Although anti-dsDNA antibodies can be made by naïve B cells and B cells belonging to the B1 and marginal zone subsets, pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies have the hallmarks of germinal center development and exposure to T cell help, including accumulation of somatic mutations and class switching to the IgG isotype. Epitope spreading may result in aquisition of cross-reactivities with multiple target organ antigens and aquisition of a memory phenotype will allow these B cells to acquire antigen presentation functions that amplify the autoreactive response. In the early stages of disease, or after remission induction protocols, autoreactive B cells may be susceptible to treatments that target T cell costimulation or that deplete or tolerize naïve and mature B cells. Therapeutic approaches targeting innate immune responses or regulatory T cells are starting to be tested in pre-clinical models. In later disease stages, memory and plasma cell accumulation may render patients more resistant to this type of therapeutic approach. Deposition of anti-dsDNA antibodies in target tissues can stimulate an inflammatory cascade that leads to tissue damage. A number of murine models have now been developed that show that interruption of this cascade can prevent or reverse such damage. This type of approach may be beneficial for individuals with established disease. As we learn more about the specific defects that cause SLE, it may become possible to individualize therapy based on patient specific biologic markers.

Immunoadsorption in systemic lupus erythematosus: different techniques and their current role in medical therapy

In the last 30 years, several studies have documented the effect of plamapheresis and immunoadsorption in eliminating pathogenic autoantibodies (AB) and immune complexes (IC) from circulation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, these extracorporeal therapies are still not accepted as first line options, which may be because of existing controlled studies failing to confirm any obvious benefit. Immunoadsorption offers some advantages compared with plasmapheresis, but until today only the avoidance of any substitution fluids has really been used. The new therapeutic options given by immunoadsorbers--a continuous application in acute disease states or chronic use instead of immunosuppressive drugs--have still to be evaluated in systemic autoimmune diseases. To date published studies of immunoadsorption in patients with SLE reveal good efficacy in a majority of patients combined with excellent biocompatibility. Randomized controlled trials are mandatory to give continued support to the therapeutic opportunities offered only by immunoadsorption; the limited number of patients suitable for this therapy necessitates multicentric cooperation.

Peptide based adsorbers for therapeutic immunoadsorption

Peptides as ligands for immunoadsorption exhibit several potential advantages over native proteins. Two newly developed adsorbers are based on peptides covalently coupled to sepharose CL-4B. Globaffin is capable of binding immunoglobulins independent from their antigen specificity and thus, applicable in transplant recipients and several antibody mediated autoimmune diseases. Among others, the most important disorders suitable for the treatment with Globaffin are rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and acute renal transplant rejection. Coraffin is a specific adsorber using two linear peptide ligands mimicking epitopes of the beta1-adrenergic receptor, that bind corresponding autoantibodies from patients suffering from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Specific immunoadsorption has been shown to be beneficial for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Coraffin can be used as a new therapeutic option for these patients, who get only limited benefit from medical therapy. Both adsorbers may be combined with all approved apheresis control devices available.

New therapies: plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and monoclonal antibodies

Rheumatologic emergencies may pose a serious threat to life, and the treatment of patients with these illnesses continues to be challenging. In the last decade extensive animal and human research has led to development of new therapies. Considerable progress has been made in the therapy for RA. Newly developed biologic therapies have shown promising results in clinical studies, and two agents have already been approved by the FDA. These drugs are currently available for therapy and are under close postmarketing scrutiny to assess long-term efficacy and safety. Similar therapies are under investigation for SLE. Plasmapheresis, once used for many diseases, is now restricted mostly to conditions for which its use has been shown to be beneficial in randomized, controlled studies. Immunoadsorption is used to target specific disease-producing pathogens for removal during extracorporeal therapy. Evidence is accumulating for the use of IVIGs in several immune-mediated conditions. The outlook for some emergencies continues be grim, however, and various therapies are used based on evidence from anecdotal case reports and case series. The new therapies are relatively safe, but careful monitoring is needed, because there is potential for serious adverse events.

Immunoadsorption therapy (therasorb) in patients with severe lupus erythematosus

Therapeutic removal of immune complexes and antibodies by plasmapheresis has been used in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) since 1974. Modern methods of selective adsorption of immunoglobulins from the patient plasma (immunoadsorption, IAS) have been developed; they deserve to be investigated as a tool in the management of difficult cases of SLE. We report our experience in an uncontrolled series of five consecutive SLE patients, in whom cytotoxic immunosuppression was contraindicated or not sufficient to control the disease. Ig-Therasorb columns containing polyclonal sheep antihuman immunoglobulin antibodies were used for IAS for periods of 4 to 54 weeks. In order to prevent rebound autoantibody production, low doses of normal human immunoglobulin were substituted. Improvement in clinical and laboratory signs of disease activity was observed in all patients. In two patients the effect of cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus pneumonitis and lupus-associated thrombopenic purpura was consolidated. In three patients suffering from pancytopenia or lupus vasculitis, the use of cytotoxic substances could be avoided for more than a year. IAS seems to be a safe replacement of conventional plasmapheresis in difficult cases of severe lupus complications. Although controlled studies are lacking, this method may occupy a few important niches as an adjunct in managing immune complex mediated diseases.

Mizoribine as an effective combined maintenance therapy with prednisolone in child-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the major collagen diseases in childhood. However, the pathogenesis of this disease still remains unknown. The disease is known as a chronic inflammatory disease. Since oral and intravenous corticosteroid therapy has been introduced into the treatment of SLE, the prognosis of patients has improved significantly. However, it has now become clear that there are limitations in the effectiveness, as well as adverse reactions when corticosteroids therapy is administered for a long-term period. Therefore, we have been attempting to improve the maintenance therapy of child-onset SLE.

METHODS

We have proposed and tested a new type of combination therapy using prednisolone (PSL) and mizoribine (MZR) in pediatric patients with SLE for maintenance therapy after the induction of remission.

RESULTS

Our results showed that this combination therapy is more effective than the previous regimen. In addition, no significant side-effects were observed in our study.

CONCLUSION

This combination therapy is still not perfect. Efforts should be continued to establish an optimal therapy regimen for child-onset SLE.

Development of cellulose-DNA immunoadsorbent

The aim of this study was to prepare a DNA immunoadsorbent for the specific, extracorporeal removal of anti-DNA antibodies from the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Two kinds of cellulose beads were applied as a carrier. Calf thymus DNA was covalently coupled to the carrier using the epichlorohydrin method. Efforts were focused on optimization of conditions for activation and coupling, trying to couple as much DNA as possible to a certain amount of carrier. It was found that the activation level increased with the increase of NaOH concentration and the amount of epichlorohydrin used. The mole of epichlorohydrin must be in excess of that of NaOH because excess NaOH could react further with the epoxy groups in the beads resulting in a decrease of activation level. High activation level could be obtained in a medium of 3.0 M NaOH. The DNA coupling was found to be mainly temperature and pH dependent. Using 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8 at a temperature of 50-90 degrees C, more than 3 mg of DNA could be coupled to 1 ml of wet beads. Prolonging the coupling reaction under 50 degrees C to 72 h resulted in the same coupling capacity as that obtained under 90 degrees C. To evaluate the adsorption ability for anti-DNA of this immunoadsorbent, batch and circulation tests were applied using SLE patient plasma. The immunoadsorbents showed excellent adsorption capacity, especially the cellulose with smaller size (200-300 microm). The incubation of 20 ml of patient's plasma with 1 ml of adsorbent resulted in an 80% decline in the anti-DNA antibody level. In the circulation tests, 30 ml of plasma was circulated through a column containing 3 ml of adsorbent. The maximum decline in anti-DNA level, 80%, was obtained after 60 min. Such high adsorption capacity and high adsorption rate suggest this immunoadsorbent may be used for treatment. For comparison, 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether activation method and other DNA sources were tested with the same protocol.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus by immunoadsorption in a patient suffering from tuberculosis

We report on a 40-year-old man, admitted with fever and weight loss, in whom systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus nephritis World Health Organization type IV) and concomitant acute lung tuberculosis were diagnosed. Conventional treatment of diffuse proliferative nephritis with cytotoxic drugs was thought to be too dangerous in the presence of active tuberculosis. A combination of immunoadsorption and steroids was instituted for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Antibodies against double-stranded DNA decreased, and proteinuria decreased from 10 g/24 hours to less than 1 g/24 hours. Tuberculosis was treated initially with quadruple-drug therapy, then a triple-drug protocol. Primarily enlarged lymph nodes decreased to normal size after 3 months. The combined treatment modality of steroids and immunoadsorption was effective and safe, even in this patient with active tuberculosis.

Development of affinity microparticles for extracorporeal blood purification based on crystalline bacterial cell surface proteins

In this article, the development of specific adsorbents for extracorporeal blood purification are described. Affinity microparticles were prepared by linking Protein A to crystalline cell surface layers (S-layers) from Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus 1111-69. S-layers were used in the form of cell wall fragments obtained by breaking whole cells by ultrasonification, resulting in cup-shaped structures (average size 0.5 x 1 microm) completely covered with S-layer protein. Protein A was covalently bound to carboxylic acid groups of the S-layer protein after activation with 1-ethyl-3,3'(dimethylamino)propylcarbodiimide. In batch adsorption experiments with fresh frozen human plasma, the resulting S-layer based affinity microparticles showed a high adsorption capacity for IgG (40 mg IgG were bound per g wet pellet of S-layer based affinity microparticles). Fractions eluted from the microparticles were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. They contained only IgG demonstrating that adsorption was specific. In biocompatibility tests, preparations of the S-layer microparticles showed no low-density lipoprotein-reactivity, no cytotoxicity, and no cytokine inducing activity.

Intravenous immunoglobulin application following immunoadsorption: benefit or risk in patients with autoimmune diseases?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate infection rates, side-effects and autoantibody resynthesis after immunoadsorption with and without intravenous immunoglobulin substitution.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with autoimmune diseases who were on long-term immunoadsorption therapy participated in a prospective, randomized study. Results and conclusions. Infections were rare but similar in frequency in patients receiving combined immunoadsorption and intravenous immunoglobulins (intervention group, n=17, 1.3 infections per patient-year) and in a control group (n=18, 0.9 infections per patient-year) treated by immunoadsorption alone. The reduction in IgG achieved with two immunoadsorptions within 3 days was 95.0+/-2.5%. The extent of removal of pathogenic autoantibodies was similar to the removal of IGG: Substitution of immunoglobulins was not associated with an increased circulating IgG level before the following immunoadsorption. Infusion of immunoglobulins at a dose of 0.14 g/kg (interquartile range 0.12-0.16) body weight in patients in whom circulating immunoglobulins had been depleted was associated with a high incidence of serious side-effects; these necessitated the termination of treatment in 24% of the patients. No evidence was found that immunoglobulin administration had any beneficial effect with respect to autoantibody resynthesis after immunoadsorption.

Apheresis

The removal of pathologic humors by various methods is an ancient medical remedy used in the management of diseases whose pathophysiology is poorly understood and whose effective treatment modalities are lacking. The contemporary means for such an approach involves apheresis, which is now possible due to advances in blood banking technologies. Apheresis has been used in most of the major rheumatic diseases, in particular systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Although numerous case reports describe clinical benefits of apheresis in rheumatologic disorders, data from clinical trials are discouraging and suggest a limited role for apheresis in rheumatic disease management.

Methodological issues of corticosteroid use in SLE clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyze how investigators handled concurrent steroid intake in SLE clinical trials; to identify remaining methodological problems and to discuss potential solutions.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed in Medline to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) in lupus published during the past decade. A set of criteria was defined a priori to analyze these trials covering different aspects of steroid use in RCTs with regard to eligibility, randomization, post-randomization steroid use, analysis and reporting.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Median sample size was 30, ranging from 10-71. In three trials corticosteroid application was the study intervention. Three reports did not address steroid use among study subjects at all. In seven trials steroid use was part of the eligibility criteria in some way. Of the trials that allowed concurrent steroid use, seven checked for equal distribution of baseline steroids. In some cases clinically relevant differences did not reach statistical significance as sample sizes were very small. In only one study was randomization stratified for steroid use. Instructions for post-randomization steroid use were specified in only 3 of 14 trials where steroids were not part of the intervention. In 11 RCTs concurrent steroid use was free or no information was provided. Steroid dosing during the intervention was reported as a secondary outcome measure in four trials.

CONCLUSIONS

As sample sizes are often small, simple randomization is not reliable to avoid relevant between-group differences in baseline steroids. The power of statistical testing for group differences is limited for the same reason. Stratified randomization is rarely used. Free concurrent steroid use during the intervention is frequently allowed in lupus RCTs despite the risk of bias. Better data and accepted standards for a priori specified steroid regimens in RCTs are highly warranted.

Evaluation of recent clinical trials in lupus

Clinical trials in lupus pose many challenges, ranging from small numbers of subjects to endpoints that are difficult to quantify. Improved standardization of both design and appropriate endpoints is necessary. Recent trials have been small in number, with few randomized controlled trials. These trials have evaluated therapies such as methotrexate, cyclosporine A, bromocriptine, immunoadsorption columns, and hydroxychloroquine withdrawal. With the advent of improved techniques as well as newer therapeutic agents, options for the treatment of lupus should begin to grow over the next several years in a fashion similar to that which has been seen in rheumatoid arthritis.