Major identity determinants in the "augmented D helix" of tRNA(Glu) from Escherichia coli

Engineering tRNAs for the Ribosomal Translation of Non-proteinogenic Monomers

Ribosome-dependent protein biosynthesis is an essential cellular process mediated by transfer RNAs (tRNAs). Generally, ribosomally synthesized proteins are limited to the 22 proteinogenic amino acids (pAAs: 20 l-α-amino acids present in the standard genetic code, selenocysteine, and pyrrolysine). However, engineering tRNAs for the ribosomal incorporation of non-proteinogenic monomers (npMs) as building blocks has led to the creation of unique polypeptides with broad applications in cellular biology, material science, spectroscopy, and pharmaceuticals. Ribosomal polymerization of these engineered polypeptides presents a variety of challenges for biochemists, as translation efficiency and fidelity is often insufficient when employing npMs. In this Review, we will focus on the methodologies for engineering tRNAs to overcome these issues and explore recent advances both in vitro and in vivo. These efforts include increasing orthogonality, recruiting essential translation factors, and creation of expanded genetic codes. After our review on the biochemical optimizations of tRNAs, we provide examples of their use in genetic code manipulation, with a focus on the in vitro discovery of bioactive macrocyclic peptides containing npMs. Finally, an analysis of the current state of tRNA engineering is presented, along with existing challenges and future perspectives for the field.

Ser/Leu-swapped cell-free translation system constructed with natural/in vitro transcribed-hybrid tRNA set

The Ser/Leu-swapped genetic code can act as a genetic firewall, mitigating biohazard risks arising from horizontal gene transfer in genetically modified organisms. Our prior work demonstrated the orthogonality of this swapped code to the standard genetic code using a cell-free translation system comprised of 21 in vitro transcribed tRNAs. In this study, to advance this system for protein engineering, we introduce a natural/in vitro transcribed-hybrid tRNA set. This set combines natural tRNAs from Escherichia coli (excluding Ser, Leu, and Tyr) and in vitro transcribed tRNAs, encompassing anticodon-swapped tRNASerGAG and tRNALeuGGA. This approach reduces the number of in vitro transcribed tRNAs required from 21 to only 4. In this optimized system, the production of a model protein, superfolder green fluorescent protein, increases to 3.5-fold. With this hybrid tRNA set, the Ser/Leu-swapped cell-free translation system will stand as a potent tool for protein production with reduced biohazard concerns in future biological endeavors.

Signatures of tRNAGlx -specificity in proteobacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases

The canonical function of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is to glutamylate tRNAGlu . Yet not all bacterial GluRSs glutamylate tRNAGlu ; many glutamylate both tRNAGlu and tRNAGln , while some glutamylate only tRNAGln and not the cognate substrate tRNAGlu . Understanding the basis of the unique specificity of tRNAGlx is important. Mutational studies have hinted at hotspot residues, both on tRNAGlx and GluRS, which play crucial roles in tRNAGlx -specificity. However, its underlying structural basis remains unexplored. The majority of biochemical studies related to tRNAGlx -specificity have been performed on GluRS from Escherichia coli and other proteobacterial species. However, since the early crystal structures of GluRS and tRNAGlu -bound GluRS were from non-proteobacterial species (Thermus thermophilus), proteobacterial biochemical data have often been interpreted in the context of non-proteobacterial GluRS structures. Marked differences between proteobacterial and non-proteobacterial GluRSs have been demonstrated; therefore, it is important to understand tRNAGlx -specificity vis-a-vis proteobacterial GluRS structures. To this end, we solved the crystal structure of a double mutant GluRS from E. coli. Using the solved structure and several other currently available proteo- and non-proteobacterial GluRS crystal structures, we probed the structural basis of the tRNAGlx -specificity of bacterial GluRSs. Specifically, our analyses suggest a unique role played by the tRNAGlx D-helix contacting loop of GluRS in the modulation of tRNAGln -specificity. While earlier studies have identified functional hotspots on tRNAGlx that control the tRNAGlx -specificity of GluRS, this is the first report of complementary signatures of tRNAGlx -specificity in GluRS.

The tRNA identity landscape for aminoacylation and beyond

tRNAs are key partners in ribosome-dependent protein synthesis. This process is highly dependent on the fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and relies primarily on sets of identities within tRNA molecules composed of determinants and antideterminants preventing mischarging by non-cognate synthetases. Such identity sets were discovered in the tRNAs of a few model organisms, and their properties were generalized as universal identity rules. Since then, the panel of identity elements governing the accuracy of tRNA aminoacylation has expanded considerably, but the increasing number of reported functional idiosyncrasies has led to some confusion. In parallel, the description of other processes involving tRNAs, often well beyond aminoacylation, has progressed considerably, greatly expanding their interactome and uncovering multiple novel identities on the same tRNA molecule. This review highlights key findings on the mechanistics and evolution of tRNA and tRNA-like identities. In addition, new methods and their results for searching sets of multiple identities on a single tRNA are discussed. Taken together, this knowledge shows that a comprehensive understanding of the functional role of individual and collective nucleotide identity sets in tRNA molecules is needed for medical, biotechnological and other applications.

Short tRNA anticodon stem and mutant eRF1 allow stop codon reassignment

Cognate tRNAs deliver specific amino acids to translating ribosomes according to the standard genetic code, and three codons with no cognate tRNAs serve as stop codons. Some protists have reassigned all stop codons as sense codons, neglecting this fundamental principle^1-4. Here we analyse the in-frame stop codons in 7,259 predicted protein-coding genes of a previously undescribed trypanosomatid, Blastocrithidia nonstop. We reveal that in this species in-frame stop codons are underrepresented in genes expressed at high levels and that UAA serves as the only termination codon. Whereas new tRNAs^Glu fully cognate to UAG and UAA evolved to reassign these stop codons, the UGA reassignment followed a different path through shortening the anticodon stem of tRNA^Trp_CCA from five to four base pairs (bp). The canonical 5-bp tRNA^Trp recognizes UGG as dictated by the genetic code, whereas its shortened 4-bp variant incorporates tryptophan also into in-frame UGA. Mimicking this evolutionary twist by engineering both variants from B. nonstop, Trypanosoma brucei and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and expressing them in the last two species, we recorded a significantly higher readthrough for all 4-bp variants. Furthermore, a gene encoding B. nonstop release factor 1 acquired a mutation that specifically restricts UGA recognition, robustly potentiating the UGA reassignment. Virtually the same strategy has been adopted by the ciliate Condylostoma magnum. Hence, we describe a previously unknown, universal mechanism that has been exploited in unrelated eukaryotes with reassigned stop codons.

Biochemistry of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase and tRNAs and Their Engineering for Cell-Free and Synthetic Cell Applications

Cell-free biology is increasingly utilized for engineering biological systems, incorporating novel functionality, and circumventing many of the complications associated with cells. The central dogma describes the information flow in biology consisting of transcription and translation steps to decode genetic information. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and tRNAs are key components involved in translation and thus protein synthesis. This review provides information on AARSs and tRNA biochemistry, their role in the translation process, summarizes progress in cell-free engineering of tRNAs and AARSs, and discusses prospects and challenges lying ahead in cell-free engineering.

An Amino Acid-Swapped Genetic Code

Preventing the escape of hazardous genes from genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment is one of the most important issues in biotechnology research. Various strategies were developed to create "genetic firewalls" that prevent the leakage of GMOs; however, they were not specially designed to prevent the escape of genes. To address this issue, we developed amino acid (AA)-swapped genetic codes orthogonal to the standard genetic code, namely SL (Ser and Leu were swapped) and SLA genetic codes (Ser, Leu, and Ala were swapped). From mRNAs encoded by the AA-swapped genetic codes, functional proteins were only synthesized in translation systems featuring the corresponding genetic codes. These results clearly demonstrated the orthogonality of the AA-swapped genetic codes against the standard genetic code and their potential to function as "genetic firewalls for genes". Furthermore, we propose "a codon-bypass strategy" to develop a GMO with an AA-swapped genetic code.

Bacterial Aspartyl-tRNA Synthetase Has Glutamyl-tRNA Synthetase Activity

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are well established as the translators of the genetic code, because their products, the aminoacyl-tRNAs, read codons to translate messenger RNAs into proteins. Consequently, deleterious errors by the aaRSs can be transferred into the proteome via misacylated tRNAs. Nevertheless, many microorganisms use an indirect pathway to produce Asn-tRNA^Asn via Asp-tRNA^Asn. This intermediate is produced by a non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-AspRS) that has retained its ability to also generate Asp-tRNA^Asp. Here we report the discovery that ND-AspRS and its discriminating counterpart, AspRS, are also capable of specifically producing Glu-tRNA^Glu, without producing misacylated tRNAs like Glu-tRNA^Asn, Glu-tRNA^Asp, or Asp-tRNA^Glu, thus maintaining the fidelity of the genetic code. Consequently, bacterial AspRSs have glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-like activity that does not contaminate the proteome via amino acid misincorporation.

Coevolution of specificity determinants in eukaryotic glutamyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases

The glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) enzyme, which pairs glutamine with tRNA(Gln) for protein synthesis, evolved by gene duplication in early eukaryotes from a nondiscriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) that aminoacylates both tRNA(Gln) and tRNA(Glu) with glutamate. This ancient GluRS also separately differentiated to exclude tRNA(Gln) as a substrate, and the resulting discriminating GluRS and GlnRS further acquired additional protein domains assisting function in cis (the GlnRS N-terminal Yqey domain) or in trans (the Arc1p protein associating with GluRS). These added domains are absent in contemporary bacterial GlnRS and GluRS. Here, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzymes as models, we find that the eukaryote-specific protein domains substantially influence amino acid binding, tRNA binding and aminoacylation efficiency, but they play no role in either specific nucleotide readout or discrimination against noncognate tRNA. Eukaryotic tRNA(Gln) and tRNA(Glu) recognition determinants are found in equivalent positions and are mutually exclusive to a significant degree, with key nucleotides located adjacent to portions of the protein structure that differentiated during the evolution of archaeal nondiscriminating GluRS to GlnRS. These findings provide important corroboration for the evolutionary model and suggest that the added eukaryotic domains arose in response to distinctive selective pressures associated with the greater complexity of the eukaryotic translational apparatus. We also find that the affinity of GluRS for glutamate is significantly increased when Arc1p is not associated with the enzyme. This is consistent with the lower concentration of intracellular glutamate and the dissociation of the Arc1p:GluRS complex upon the diauxic shift to respiratory conditions.

Preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of an engineered glutamyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli

The nature of interaction between glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) and its tRNA substrate is unique in bacteria in that many bacterial GluRS are capable of recognizing two tRNA substrates: tRNAGlu and tRNAGln. To properly understand this distinctive GluRS-tRNA interaction it is important to pursue detailed structure-function studies; however, because of the fact that tRNA-GluRS interaction in bacteria is also associated with phylum-specific idiosyncrasies, the structure-function correlation studies must also be phylum-specific. GluRS from Thermus thermophilus and Escherichia coli, which belong to evolutionarily distant phyla, are the biochemically best characterized. Of these, only the structure of T. thermophilus GluRS is available. To fully unravel the subtleties of tRNAGlu-GluRS interaction in E. coli, a model bacterium that can also be pathogenic, determination of the E. coli GluRS structure is essential. However, previous attempts have failed to crystallize E. coli GluRS. By mapping crystal contacts of a homologous GluRS onto the E. coli GluRS sequence, two surface residues were identified that might have been hindering crystallization attempts. Accordingly, these two residues were mutated and crystallization of the double mutant was attempted. Here, the design, expression, purification and crystallization of an engineered E. coli GluRS in which two surface residues were mutated to optimize crystal contacts are reported.

Structural and functional consequences of mutating a proteobacteria-specific surface residue in the catalytic domain of Escherichia coli GluRS

Nucleotides whose mutations seriously affect glutamylation efficiency are experimentally known for Escherichia coli tRNA(Glu). However, not much is known about functional hotspots on the complementary enzyme, glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). From structural and functional studies on an Arg266Leu mutant of E. coli GluRS, we demonstrate that Arg266 is essential for efficient glutamylation of tRNA(Glu). Consistent with this result, we found that Arg266 is a conserved signature of proteobacterial GluRS. In contrast, most non-proteobacterial GluRS contain Leu, and never Arg, at this position. Our results imply a unique strategy of glutamylation of tRNA(Glu) in proteobacteria under phylum-specific evolutionary compulsions.

Mapping hidden potential identity elements by computing the average discriminating power of individual tRNA positions

The recently published discrete mathematical method, extended consensus partition (ECP), identifies nucleotide types at each position that are strictly absent from a given sequence set, while occur in other sets. These are defined as discriminating elements (DEs). In this study using the ECP approach, we mapped potential hidden identity elements that discriminate the 20 different tRNA identities. We filtered the tDNA data set for the obligatory presence of well-established tRNA features, and then separately for each identity set, the presence of already experimentally identified strictly present identity elements. The analysis was performed on the three kingdoms of life. We determined the number of DE, e.g. the number of sets discriminated by the given position, for each tRNA position of each tRNA identity set. Then, from the positional DE numbers obtained from the 380 pairwise comparisons of the 20 identity sets, we calculated the average excluding value (AEV) for each tRNA position. The AEV provides a measure on the overall discriminating power of each position. Using a statistical analysis, we show that positional AEVs correlate with the number of already identified identity elements. Positions having high AEV but lacking published identity elements predict hitherto undiscovered tRNA identity elements.

Post-translational control of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria

The tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway provides the vital cofactors and pigments for photoautotrophic growth (chlorophyll), several essential redox reactions in electron transport chains (haem), N- and S-assimilation (sirohaem), and photomorphogenic processes (phytochromobilin). While the biochemistry of the pathway is well understood and almost all genes encoding enzymes of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis have been identified in plants, the post-translational control and organization of the pathway remains to be clarified. Post-translational mechanisms controlling metabolic activities are of particular interest since tetrapyrrole biosynthesis needs adaptation to environmental challenges. This review surveys post-translational mechanisms that have been reported to modulate metabolic activities and organization of the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway.

Exit strategies for charged tRNA from GluRS

For several class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), the rate-determining step in aminoacylation is the dissociation of charged tRNA from the enzyme. In this study, the following factors affecting the release of the charged tRNA from aaRSs are computationally explored: the protonation states of amino acids and substrates present in the active site, and the presence and the absence of AMP and elongation factor Tu. Through molecular modeling, internal pK(a) calculations, and molecular dynamics simulations, distinct, mechanistically relevant post-transfer states with charged tRNA bound to glutamyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus (Glu-tRNA(Glu)) are considered. The behavior of these nonequilibrium states is characterized as a function of time using dynamical network analysis, local energetics, and changes in free energies to estimate transitions that occur during the release of the tRNA. The hundreds of nanoseconds of simulation time reveal system characteristics that are consistent with recent experimental studies. Energetic and network results support the previously proposed mechanism in which the transfer of amino acid to tRNA is accompanied by the protonation of AMP to H-AMP. Subsequent migration of proton to water reduces the stability of the complex and loosens the interface both in the presence and in the absence of AMP. The subsequent undocking of AMP or tRNA then proceeds along thermodynamically competitive pathways. Release of the tRNA acceptor stem is further accelerated by the deprotonation of the alpha-ammonium group on the charging amino acid. The proposed general base is Glu41, a residue binding the alpha-ammonium group that is conserved in both structure and sequence across nearly all class I aaRSs. This universal handle is predicted through pK(a) calculations to be part of a proton relay system for destabilizing the bound charging amino acid following aminoacylation. Addition of elongation factor Tu to the aaRS.tRNA complex stimulates the dissociation of the tRNA core and the tRNA acceptor stem.

Recognition of tRNAGln by Helicobacter pylori GluRS2--a tRNAGln-specific glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Accurate aminoacylation of tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) plays a critical role in protein translation. However, some of the aaRSs are missing in many microorganisms. Helicobacter pylori does not have a glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) but has two divergent glutamyl-tRNA synthetases: GluRS1 and GluRS2. Like a canonical GluRS, GluRS1 aminoacylates tRNA^Glu1 and tRNA^Glu2. In contrast, GluRS2 only misacylates tRNA^Gln to form Glu-tRNA^Gln. It is not clear how GluRS2 achieves specific recognition of tRNA^Gln while rejecting the two H. pylori tRNA^Glu isoacceptors. Here, we show that GluRS2 recognizes major identity elements clustered in the tRNA^Gln acceptor stem. Mutations in the tRNA anticodon or at the discriminator base had little to no impact on enzyme specificity and activity.

Crystal structure of human selenocysteine tRNA

Selenocysteine (Sec) is the 21st amino acid in translation. Sec tRNA (tRNA^Sec) has an anticodon complementary to the UGA codon. We solved the crystal structure of human tRNA^Sec. tRNA^Sec has a 9-bp acceptor stem and a 4-bp T stem, in contrast with the 7-bp acceptor stem and the 5-bp T stem in the canonical tRNAs. The acceptor stem is kinked between the U6:U67 and G7:C66 base pairs, leading to a bent acceptor-T stem helix. tRNA^Sec has a 6-bp D stem and a 4-nt D loop. The long D stem includes unique A14:U21 and G15:C20a pairs. The D-loop:T-loop interactions include the base pairs G18:U55 and U16:U59, and a unique base triple, U20:G19:C56. The extra arm comprises of a 6-bp stem and a 4-nt loop. Remarkably, the D stem and the extra arm do not form tertiary interactions in tRNA^Sec. Instead, tRNA^Sec has an open cavity, in place of the tertiary core of a canonical tRNA. The linker residues, A8 and U9, connecting the acceptor and D stems, are not involved in tertiary base pairing. Instead, U9 is stacked on the first base pair of the extra arm. These features might allow tRNA^Sec to be the target of the Sec synthesis/incorporation machineries.

The role of the catalytic domain of E. coli GluRS in tRNAGln discrimination

Discrimination of tRNA(Gln) is an integral function of several bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRS). The origin of the discrimination is thought to arise from unfavorable interactions between tRNA(Gln) and the anticodon-binding domain of GluRS. From experiments on an anticodon-binding domain truncated Escherichia coli (E. coli) GluRS (catalytic domain) and a chimeric protein, constructed from the catalytic domain of E. coli GluRS and the anticodon-binding domain of E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS), we show that both proteins discriminate against E. coli tRNA(Gln). Our results demonstrate that in addition to the anticodon-binding domain, tRNA(Gln) discriminatory elements may be present in the catalytic domain in E. coli GluRS as well.

Dynamical networks in tRNA:protein complexes

Community network analysis derived from molecular dynamics simulations is used to identify and compare the signaling pathways in a bacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS):tRNA(Glu) and an archaeal leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS):tRNA(Leu) complex. Although the 2 class I synthetases have remarkably different interactions with their cognate tRNAs, the allosteric networks for charging tRNA with the correct amino acid display considerable similarities. A dynamic contact map defines the edges connecting nodes (amino acids and nucleotides) in the physical network whose overall topology is presented as a network of communities, local substructures that are highly intraconnected, but loosely interconnected. Whereas nodes within a single community can communicate through many alternate pathways, the communication between monomers in different communities has to take place through a smaller number of critical edges or interactions. Consistent with this analysis, there are a large number of suboptimal paths that can be used for communication between the identity elements on the tRNAs and the catalytic site in the aaRS:tRNA complexes. Residues and nucleotides in the majority of pathways for intercommunity signal transmission are evolutionarily conserved and are predicted to be important for allosteric signaling. The same monomers are also found in a majority of the suboptimal paths. Modifying these residues or nucleotides has a large effect on the communication pathways in the protein:RNA complex consistent with kinetic data.

Crystal structure of glutamyl-queuosine tRNAAsp synthetase complexed with L-glutamate: structural elements mediating tRNA-independent activation of glutamate and glutamylation of tRNAAsp anticodon

Glutamyl-queuosine tRNA(Asp) synthetase (Glu-Q-RS) from Escherichia coli is a paralog of the catalytic core of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) that catalyzes glutamylation of queuosine in the wobble position of tRNA(Asp). Despite important structural similarities, Glu-Q-RS and GluRS diverge strongly by their functional properties. The only feature common to both enzymes consists in the activation of Glu to form Glu-AMP, the intermediate of transfer RNA (tRNA) aminoacylation. However, both enzymes differ by the mechanism of selection of the cognate amino acid and by the mechanism of its activation. Whereas GluRS selects l-Glu and activates it only in the presence of the cognate tRNA(Glu), Glu-Q-RS forms Glu-AMP in the absence of tRNA. Moreover, while GluRS transfers the activated Glu to the 3' accepting end of the cognate tRNA(Glu), Glu-Q-RS transfers the activated Glu to Q34 located in the anticodon loop of the noncognate tRNA(Asp). In order to gain insight into the structural elements leading to distinct mechanisms of amino acid activation, we solved the three-dimensional structure of Glu-Q-RS complexed to Glu and compared it to the structure of the GluRS.Glu complex. Comparison of the catalytic site of Glu-Q-RS with that of GluRS, combined with binding experiments of amino acids, shows that a restricted number of residues determine distinct catalytic properties of amino acid recognition and activation by the two enzymes. Furthermore, to explore the structural basis of the distinct aminoacylation properties of the two enzymes and to understand why Glu-Q-RS glutamylates only tRNA(Asp) among the tRNAs possessing queuosine in position 34, we performed a tRNA mutational analysis to search for the elements of tRNA(Asp) that determine recognition by Glu-Q-RS. The analyses made on tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) show that the presence of a C in position 38 is crucial for glutamylation of Q34. The results are discussed in the context of the evolution and adaptation of the tRNA glutamylation system.

A rationally engineered misacylating aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

Information transfer from nucleic acid to protein is mediated by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, which catalyze the specific pairings of amino acids with transfer RNAs. Despite copious sequence and structural information on the 22 tRNA synthetase families, little is known of the enzyme signatures that specify amino acid selectivities. Here, we show that transplanting a conserved arginine residue from glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) to glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) improves the K(M) of GlnRS for noncognate glutamate. Two crystal structures of this C229R GlnRS mutant reveal that a conserved twin-arginine GluRS amino acid identity signature cannot be incorporated into GlnRS without disrupting surrounding protein structural elements that interact with the tRNA. Consistent with these findings, we show that cumulative replacement of other primary binding site residues in GlnRS, with those of GluRS, only slightly improves the ability of the GlnRS active site to accommodate glutamate. However, introduction of 22 amino acid replacements and one deletion, including substitution of the entire primary binding site and two surface loops adjacent to the region disrupted in C229R, improves the capacity of Escherichia coli GlnRS to synthesize misacylated Glu-tRNA(Gln) by 16,000-fold. This hybrid enzyme recapitulates the function of misacylating GluRS enzymes found in organisms that synthesize Gln-tRNA(Gln) by an alternative pathway. These findings implicate the RNA component of the contemporary GlnRS-tRNA(Gln) complex in mediating amino acid specificity. This role for tRNA may persist as a relic of primordial cells in which the evolution of the genetic code was driven by RNA-catalyzed amino acid-RNA pairing.

Structural bases of transfer RNA-dependent amino acid recognition and activation by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that require the cognate tRNA for specific amino acid recognition and activation. We analyzed the role of tRNA in amino acid recognition by crystallography. In the GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*Glu structure, GluRS and tRNA(Glu) collaborate to form a highly complementary L-glutamate-binding site. This collaborative site is functional, as it is formed in the same manner in pretransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ATP*Eol (a glutamate analog), and posttransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ESA (a glutamyl-adenylate analog) structures. In contrast, in the GluRS*Glu structure, only GluRS forms the amino acid-binding site, which is defective and accounts for the binding of incorrect amino acids, such as D-glutamate and L-glutamine. Therefore, tRNA(Glu) is essential for formation of the completely functional binding site for L-glutamate. These structures, together with our previously described structures, reveal that tRNA plays a crucial role in accurate positioning of both L-glutamate and ATP, thus driving the amino acid activation.

Emergence of the universal genetic code imprinted in an RNA record

The molecular basis of the genetic code manifests itself in the interaction of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their cognate tRNAs. The fundamental biological question regarding these enzymes' role in the evolution of the genetic code remains open. Here we probe this question in a system in which the same tRNA species is aminoacylated by two unrelated synthetases. Should this tRNA possess major identity elements common to both enzymes, this would favor a scenario where the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases evolved in the context of preestablished tRNA identity, i.e., after the universal genetic code emerged. An experimental system is provided by the recently discovered O-phosphoseryl-tRNA synthetase (SepRS), which acylates tRNA(Cys) with phosphoserine (Sep), and the well known cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase, which charges the same tRNA with cysteine. We determined the identity elements of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii tRNA(Cys) in the aminoacylation reaction for the two Methanococcus maripaludis synthetases SepRS (forming Sep-tRNA(Cys)) and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (forming Cys-tRNA(Cys)). The major elements, the discriminator base and the three anticodon bases, are shared by both tRNA synthetases. An evolutionary analysis of archaeal, bacterial, and eukaryotic tRNA(Cys) sequences predicted additional SepRS-specific minor identity elements (G37, A47, and A59) and suggested the dominance of vertical inheritance for tRNA(Cys) from a single common ancestor. Transplantation of the identified identity elements into the Escherichia coli tRNA(Gly) scaffold endowed facile phosphoserylation activity on the resulting chimera. Thus, tRNA(Cys) identity is an ancient RNA record that depicts the emergence of the universal genetic code before the evolution of the modern aminoacylation systems.

Visualizing bacterial tRNA identity determinants and antideterminants using function logos and inverse function logos

Sequence logos are stacked bar graphs that generalize the notion of consensus sequence. They employ entropy statistics very effectively to display variation in a structural alignment of sequences of a common function, while emphasizing its over-represented features. Yet sequence logos cannot display features that distinguish functional subclasses within a structurally related superfamily nor do they display under-represented features. We introduce two extensions to address these needs: function logos and inverse logos. Function logos display subfunctions that are over-represented among sequences carrying a specific feature. Inverse logos generalize both sequence logos and function logos by displaying under-represented, rather than over-represented, features or functions in structural alignments. To make inverse logos, a compositional inverse is applied to the feature or function frequency distributions before logo construction, where a compositional inverse is a mathematical transform that makes common features or functions rare and vice versa. We applied these methods to a database of structurally aligned bacterial tDNAs to create highly condensed, birds-eye views of potentially all so-called identity determinants and antideterminants that confer specific amino acid charging or initiator function on tRNAs in bacteria. We recovered both known and a few potentially novel identity elements. Function logos and inverse logos are useful tools for exploratory bioinformatic analysis of structure–function relationships in sequence families and superfamilies.

A tRNA(Glu) that uncouples protein and tetrapyrrole biosynthesis

Glu-tRNA is either bound to elongation factor Tu to enter protein synthesis or is reduced by glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) in the first step of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in most bacteria, archaea and in chloroplasts. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, a bacterium that synthesizes a vast amount of heme, contains three genes encoding tRNA(Glu). All tRNA(Glu) species are substrates in vitro of GluRS1 from A. ferrooxidans.Glu-tRNA(3)(Glu), that fulfills the requirements for protein synthesis, is not substrate of GluTR. Therefore, aminoacylation of tRNA(3)(Glu) might contribute to ensure protein synthesis upon high heme demand by an uncoupling of protein and heme biosynthesis.

Transfer RNA recognition by class I lysyl-tRNA synthetase from the Lyme disease pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi

Borrelia burgdorferi and other spirochetes contain a class I lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS), in contrast to most eubacteria that have a canonical class II LysRS. We analyzed tRNA(Lys) recognition by B. burgdorferi LysRS, using two complementary approaches. First, the nucleotides of B. burgdorferi tRNA(Lys) in contact with B. burgdorferi LysRS were determined by enzymatic footprinting experiments. Second, the kinetic parameters for a series of variants of the B. burgdorferi tRNA(Lys) were then determined during aminoacylation by B. burgdorferi LysRS. The identity elements were found to be mostly located in the anticodon and in the acceptor stem. Transplantation of the identified identity elements into the Escherichia coli tRNA(Asp) scaffold endowed lysylation activity on the resulting chimera, indicating that a functional B. burgdorferi lysine tRNA identity set had been determined.

Role of Arc1p in the modulation of yeast glutamyl-tRNA synthetase activity

Yeast methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) and glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) possess N-terminal extensions that bind the cofactor Arc1p in trans. The strength of GluRS-Arc1p interaction is high enough to allow copurification of the two macromolecules in a 1:1 ratio, in contrast to MetRS. Deletion analysis from the C-terminal end of the GluRS appendix combined with previous N-terminal deletions of GluRS allows restriction of the Arc1p binding site to the 110-170 amino acid region of GluRS. This region has been shown to correspond to a novel protein-protein interaction domain present in both GluRS and Arc1p but not in MetRS [Galani, K., Grosshans, H., Deinert, K., Hurt, E. C., and Simos, G. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 6889-6898]. The GluRS apoenzyme fails to show significant kinetics of tRNA aminoacylation and charges unfractionated yeast tRNA at a level 10-fold reduced compared to Arc1p-bound GluRS. The K(m) values for tRNA(Glu) measured in the ATP-PP(i) exchange were similar for the two forms of GluRS, whereas k(cat) is increased 2-fold in the presence of Arc1p. Band-shift analysis revealed a 100-fold increase in tRNA binding affinity when Arc1p is bound to GluRS. This increase requires the RNA binding properties of the full-length Arc1p since Arc1p N domain leaves the K(d) of GluRS for tRNA unchanged. Transcripts of yeast tRNA(Glu) were poor substrates for measuring tRNA aminoacylation and could not be used to clarify whether Arc1p has a specific effect on the tRNA charging reaction.

Nanoarchaeum equitans creates functional tRNAs from separate genes for their 5'- and 3'-halves

Analysis of the genome sequence of the small hyperthermophilic archaeal parasite Nanoarchaeum equitans has not revealed genes encoding the glutamate, histidine, tryptophan and initiator methionine transfer RNA species. Here we develop a computational approach to genome analysis that searches for widely separated genes encoding tRNA halves that, on the basis of structural prediction, could form intact tRNA molecules. A search of the N. equitans genome reveals nine genes that encode tRNA halves; together they account for the missing tRNA genes. The tRNA sequences are split after the anticodon-adjacent position 37, the normal location of tRNA introns. The terminal sequences can be accommodated in an intervening sequence that includes a 12-14-nucleotide GC-rich RNA duplex between the end of the 5' tRNA half and the beginning of the 3' tRNA half. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and aminoacylation experiments of N. equitans tRNA demonstrated maturation to full-size tRNA and acceptor activity of the tRNA(His) and tRNA(Glu) species predicted in silico. As the joining mechanism possibly involves tRNA trans-splicing, the presence of an intron might have been required for early tRNA synthesis.

Divergent anticodon recognition in contrasting glutamyl-tRNA synthetases

The pathogenic bacterium Helicobacter pylori utilizes two essential glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRS1 and GluRS2). These two enzymes are closely related in evolution and yet they aminoacylate contrasting tRNAs. GluRS1 is a canonical discriminating GluRS (D-GluRS) that biosynthesizes Glu-tRNA(Glu) and cannot make Glu-tRNA(Gln). In contrast, GluRS2 is non-canonical as it is only essential for the production of misacylated Glu-tRNA(Gln). The co-existence and evident divergence of these two enzymes was capitalized upon to directly examine how GluRS2 acquired tRNA(Gln) specificity. One key feature that distinguishes tRNA(Glu) from tRNA(Gln) is the third position in the anticodon of each tRNA (C36 versus G36, respectively). By comparing sequence alignments of different GluRSs, including GluRS1s and GluRS2s, to the crystal structure of the Thermus thermophilus D-GluRS:tRNA(Glu) complex, a divergent pattern of conservation in enzymes that aminoacylate tRNA(Glu)versus those specific for tRNA(Gln) emerged and was experimentally validated. In particular, when an arginine conserved in discriminating GluRSs and GluRS1s was inserted into Hp GluRS2 (Glu334Arg GluRS2), the catalytic efficiency of the mutant enzyme (k(cat)/K(Mapp)) was reduced by approximately one order of magnitude towards tRNA(Gln). However, this mutation did not introduce activity towards tRNA(Glu). In contrast, disruption of a glycine that is conserved in all GluRS2s but not in other GluRSs (Gly417Thr GluRS2) generated a mutant GluRS2 with weak activity towards tRNA(Glu1). Synergy between these two mutations was observed in the double mutant (Glu334Arg/Gly417Thr GluRS2), which specifically and more robustly aminoacylates tRNA(Glu1) instead of tRNA(Gln). As GluRS1 and GluRS2 are related by an apparent gene duplication event, these results demonstrate that we can experimentally map critical evolutionary events in the emergence of new tRNA specificities.

Shape-selective RNA recognition by cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structure of Escherichia coli cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) bound to tRNA(Cys) at a resolution of 2.3 A reveals base-specific and shape-selective interactions across an extensive protein-RNA recognition interface. The complex contains a mixed alpha/beta C-terminal domain, which is disordered in the unliganded enzyme. This domain makes specific hydrogen bonding interactions with all three bases of the GCA anticodon. The tRNA anticodon stem is bent sharply toward the enzyme as compared with its conformation when bound to elongation factor Tu, providing an essential basis for shape-selective recognition. The CysRS structure also reveals interactions of conserved enzyme groups with the sugar-phosphate backbone in the D loop, adjacent to an unusual G15.G48 tertiary base pair previously implicated in tRNA aminoacylation. A combined mutational analysis of enzyme and tRNA groups at G15.G48 supports the notion that contacts between CysRS and the sugar-phosphate backbone contribute to recognition by indirect readout.

The affinity of elongation factor Tu for an aminoacyl-tRNA is modulated by the esterified amino acid

When different mutations were introduced into the anticodon loop and at position 73 of YFA2, a derivative of yeast tRNA(Phe), a single tRNA body was misacylated with 13 different amino acids. The affinities of these misacylated tRNAs for Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu).GTP were determined using a ribonuclease protection assay. A range of 2.5 kcal/mol in the binding energies was observed, clearly demonstrating that EF-Tu specifically recognizes the side chain of the esterified amino acid. Furthermore, this specificity can be altered by introducing a mutation in the amino acid binding pocket on the surface of EF-Tu. Also, when discussed in conjunction with the previously determined specificity of EF-Tu for the tRNA body, these experiments further demonstrate that EF-Tu uses thermodynamic compensation to bind cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs similarly.

tRNA recognition by glutamyl-tRNA reductase

During the first step of porphyrin biosynthesis in Archaea, most bacteria, and in chloroplasts glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of glutamyl-tRNA to glutamate-1-semialdehyde. Elements in tRNA(Glu) important for utilization by Escherichia coli GluTR were determined by kinetic analysis of 51 variant transcripts of E. coli Glu-tRNA(Glu). Base U8, the U13*G22**A46 base triple, the tertiary Watson-Crick base pair 19*56, and the lack of residue 47 are required for GluTR recognition. All of these bases contribute to the formation of the unique tertiary core of E. coli tRNA-(Glu). Two tRNA(Glu) molecules lacking the entire anticodon stem/loop but retaining the tertiary core structure remained substrates for GluTR, while further decreasing tRNA size toward a minihelix abolished GluTR activity. RNA footprinting experiments revealed the physical interaction of GluTR with the tertiary core of Glu-tRNA(Glu). E. coli GluTR showed clear selectivity against mischarged Glu-tRNA(Gln). We concluded that the unique tertiary core structure of E. coli tRNA(Glu) was sufficient for E. coli GluTR to distinguish specifically its glutamyl-tRNA substrate.

The Escherichia coli YadB gene product reveals a novel aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase like activity

In the course of a structural genomics program aiming at solving the structures of Escherichia coli open reading frame products of unknown function, we have determined the structure of YadB at 1.5A using molecular replacement. The YadB protein is 298 amino acid residues long and displays 34% sequence identity with E.coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). It is much shorter than GluRS, which contains 468 residues, and lacks the complete domain interacting with the tRNA anticodon loop. As E.coli GluRS, YadB possesses a Zn2+ located in the putative tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain. The YadB cluster uses cysteine residues as the first three zinc ligands, but has a weaker tyrosine ligand at the fourth position. It shares with canonical amino acid RNA synthetases a major functional feature, namely activation of the amino acid (here glutamate). It differs, however, from GluRSs by the fact that the activation step is tRNA-independent and that it does not catalyze attachment of the activated glutamate to E.coli tRNAGlu, but to another, as yet unknown tRNA. These results suggest thus a novel function, distinct from that of GluRSs, for the yadB gene family.

Coevolution of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with its tRNA substrates

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRSs) occur in two types, the discriminating and the nondiscriminating enzymes. They differ in their choice of substrates and use either tRNAGlu or both tRNAGlu and tRNAGln. Although most organisms encode only one GluRS, a number of bacteria encode two different GluRS proteins; yet, the tRNA specificity of these enzymes and the reason for such gene duplications are unknown. A database search revealed duplicated GluRS genes in >20 bacterial species, suggesting that this phenomenon is not unusual in the bacterial domain. To determine the tRNA preferences of GluRS, we chose the duplicated enzyme sets from Helicobacter pylori and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. H. pylori contains one tRNAGlu and one tRNAGln species, whereas A. ferrooxidans possesses two of each. We show that the duplicated GluRS proteins are enzyme pairs with complementary tRNA specificities. The H. pylori GluRS1 acylated only tRNAGlu, whereas GluRS2 was specific solely for tRNAGln. The A. ferrooxidans GluRS2 preferentially charged tRNA(UUG)(Gln). Conversely, A. ferrooxidans GluRS1 glutamylated both tRNAGlu isoacceptors and the tRNA(CUG)(Gln) species. These three tRNA species have two structural elements in common, the augmented D-helix and a deletion of nucleotide 47. It appears that the discriminating or nondiscriminating natures of different GluRS enzymes have been derived by the coevolution of protein and tRNA structure. The coexistence of the two GluRS enzymes in one organism may lay the groundwork for the acquisition of the canonical glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase by lateral gene transfer from eukaryotes.

ATP binding by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase is switched to the productive mode by tRNA binding

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the formation of an aminoacyl-AMP from an amino acid and ATP, prior to the aminoacyl transfer to tRNA. A subset of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), have a regulation mechanism to avoid aminoacyl-AMP formation in the absence of tRNA. In this study, we determined the crystal structure of the 'non-productive' complex of Thermus thermophilus GluRS, ATP and L-glutamate, together with those of the GluRS.ATP, GluRS.tRNA.ATP and GluRS.tRNA.GoA (a glutamyl-AMP analog) complexes. In the absence of tRNA(Glu), ATP is accommodated in a 'non-productive' subsite within the ATP-binding site, so that the ATP alpha-phosphate and the glutamate alpha-carboxyl groups in GluRS. ATP.Glu are too far from each other (6.2 A) to react. In contrast, the ATP-binding mode in GluRS.tRNA. ATP is dramatically different from those in GluRS.ATP.Glu and GluRS.ATP, but corresponds to the AMP moiety binding mode in GluRS.tRNA.GoA (the 'productive' subsite). Therefore, tRNA binding to GluRS switches the ATP-binding mode. The interactions of the three tRNA(Glu) regions with GluRS cause conformational changes around the ATP-binding site, and allow ATP to bind to the 'productive' subsite.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNAs are substrates for translation and are pivotal in determining how the genetic code is interpreted as amino acids. The function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is to precisely match amino acids with tRNAs containing the corresponding anticodon. This is primarily achieved by the direct attachment of an amino acid to the corresponding tRNA by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, although intrinsic proofreading and extrinsic editing are also essential in several cases. Recent studies of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, mainly prompted by the advent of whole genome sequencing and the availability of a vast body of structural data, have led to an expanded and more detailed picture of how aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized. This article reviews current knowledge of the biochemical, structural, and evolutionary facets of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

Crucial role of the high-loop lysine for the catalytic activity of arginyl-tRNA synthetase

The presence of two short signature sequence motifs (His-Ile-Gly-His (HIGH) and Lys-Met-Ser-Lys (KMSK)) is a characteristic of the class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These motifs constitute a portion of the catalytic site in three dimensions and play an important role in catalysis. In particular, the second lysine of the KMSK motif (K2) is the crucial catalytic residue for stabilization of the transition state of the amino acid activation reaction (aminoacyl-adenylate formation). Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) is unique among all of the class I enyzmes, as the majority of ArgRS species lack canonical KMSK sequences. Thus, the mechanism by which this group of ArgRSs achieves the catalytic reaction is not well understood. Using three-dimensional modeling in combination with sequence analysis and site-directed mutagenesis, we found a conserved lysine in the KMSK-lacking ArgRSs upstream of the HIGH sequence motif, which is likely to be a functional counterpart of the canonical class I K2 lysine. The results suggest a plausible partition of the ArgRSs into two major groups, on the basis of the conservation of the HIGH lysine.

Evidence for unfolding of the single-stranded GCCA 3'-End of a tRNA on its aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase from a stacked helical to a foldback conformation

The conformation of a tRNA in its initial contact with its cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase was investigated with the Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Glu) complex. Covalent complexes between the periodate-oxidized tRNA(Glu) and its synthetase were obtained. These complexes are specific since none were formed with any other oxidized E. coli tRNA. The three major residues cross-linked to the 3'-terminal adenosine of oxidized tRNA(Glu) are Lys115, Arg209, and Arg48. Modeling of the tRNA(Glu)-glutamyl-tRNA synthetase based on the known crystal structures of Thermus thermophilus GluRS and of the E. coli tRNA(Gln)-glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase complex shows that these three residues are located in the pocket that binds the acceptor stem, and that Lys115, located in a 26 residue loop closed by coordination to a zinc atom in the tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain, is the first contact point of the 3'-terminal adenosine of tRNA(Glu). In our model, we assume that the 3'-terminal GCCA single-stranded segment of tRNA(Glu) is helical and extends the stacking of the acceptor stem. This assumption is supported by the fact that the 3' CCA sequence of tRNA(Glu) is not readily circularized in the presence of T4 RNA ligase under conditions where several other tRNAs are circularized. The two other cross-linked sites are interpreted as the contact sites of the 3'-terminal ribose on the enzyme during the unfolding and movement of the 3'-terminal GCCA segment to position the acceptor ribose in the catalytic site for aminoacylation.

Influence of transfer RNA tertiary structure on aminoacylation efficiency by glutaminyl and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases

The position of the tertiary Levitt pair between nucleotides 15 and 48 in the transfer RNA core region suggests a key role in stabilizing the joining of the two helical domains, and in maintaining the relative orientations of the D and variable loops. E. coli tRNA(Gln) possesses the canonical Pu15-Py48 trans pairing at this position (G15-C48), while the tRNA(Cys) species from this organism instead features an unusual G15-G48 pair. To explore the structural context dependence of a G15-G48 Levitt pair, a number of tRNA(Gln) species containing G15-G48 were constructed and evaluated as substrates for glutaminyl and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases. The glutaminylation efficiencies of these mutant tRNAs are reduced by two to tenfold compared with native tRNA(Gln), consistent with previous findings that the tertiary core of this tRNA plays a role in GlnRS recognition. Introduction of tRNA(Cys) identity nucleotides at the acceptor and anticodon ends of tRNA(Gln) produced a tRNA substrate which was efficiently aminoacylated by CysRS, even though the tertiary core region of this species contains the tRNA(Gln) G15-C48 pair. Surprisingly, introduction of G15-G48 into the non-cognate tRNA(Gln) tertiary core then significantly impairs CysRS recognition. By contrast, previous work has shown that CysRS aminoacylates tRNA(Cys) core regions containing G15-G48 with much better efficiency than those with G15-C48. Therefore, tertiary nucleotides surrounding the Levitt pair must significantly modulate the efficiency of aminoacylation by CysRS. To explore the detailed nature of the structural interdependence, crystal structures of two tRNA(Gln) mutants containing G15-G48 were determined bound to GlnRS. These structures show that the larger purine ring of G48 is accommodated by rotation into the syn position, with the N7 nitrogen serving as hydrogen bond acceptor from several groups of G15. The G15-G48 conformations differ significantly compared to that observed in the native tRNA(Cys) structure bound to EF-Tu, further implicating an important role for surrounding nucleotides in maintaining the integrity of the tertiary core and its consequent ability to present crucial recognition determinants to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Transfer RNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are an ancient group of enzymes that catalyze the covalent attachment of an amino acid to its cognate transfer RNA. The question of specificity, that is, how each synthetase selects the correct individual or isoacceptor set of tRNAs for each amino acid, has been referred to as the second genetic code. A wealth of structural, biochemical, and genetic data on this subject has accumulated over the past 40 years. Although there are now crystal structures of sixteen of the twenty synthetases from various species, there are only a few high resolution structures of synthetases complexed with cognate tRNAs. Here we review briefly the structural information available for synthetases, and focus on the structural features of tRNA that may be used for recognition. Finally, we explore in detail the insights into specific recognition gained from classical and atomic group mutagenesis experiments performed with tRNAs, tRNA fragments, and small RNAs mimicking portions of tRNAs.

Effect of modified nucleotides on Escherichia coli tRNAGlu structure and on its aminoacylation by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. Predominant and distinct roles of the mnm5 and s2 modifications of U34

Overproducing Escherichia coli tRNAGlu in its homologous host results in the presence of several distinctly modified forms of this molecule that we name modivariants. The predominant tRNAGlu modivariant in wild-type E. coli contains five modified nucleosides: Psi13, mnm5s2U34, m2A37, T54 and Psi55. Four other overproduced modivariants differ from it by, respectively, either the presence of an additional Psi, or the presence of s2U34, or the lack of A37 methylation combined with either s2U34 or U34. Chemical probing reveals that the anticodon loop of the predominant modivariant is less reactive to the probes than that of the four others. Furthermore, the modivariant with neither mnm5s2U34 nor m2A37 has additional perturbations in the D- and T-arms and in the variable region. The lack of a 2-thio group in nucleoside 34, which is mnm5s2U in the predominant tRNAGlu modivariant, decreases by 520-fold the specificity of E. coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase for tRNAGlu in the aminoacylation reaction, showing that this thio group is the identity element in the modified wobble nucleotide of E. coli tRNAGlu. The modified nucleosides content also influences the recognition of ATP and glutamate by this enzyme, and in this case also, the predominant modivariant is the one that allows the best specificity for these two substrates. These structural and kinetic properties of tRNAGlu modivariants indicate that the modification system of tRNAGlu optimizes the stability of tRNAGlu and its action as cofactor of the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase for the recognition of glutamate and ATP.

tRNA glycylation system from Thermus thermophilus. tRNAGly identity and functional interrelation with the glycylation systems from other phylae

The systems of tRNA glycylation belong to the most complex aminoacylation systems since neither the oligomeric structure of glycyl-tRNA synthetases (GlyRS) nor the discriminator bases in tRNAGly are conserved in the phylae. To better understand the structure-function relationship in glycylation systems of various origins and the functional peculiarities related to their structural divergences, the elements in tRNA conferring its glycine identity in Thermus thermophilus were characterized and compared to those of other systems. Thermophilic identity is conferred by the G1-C72, C2-G71, G3-C70, and C50-G64 pairs together with the G10, U16, C35, and C36 single residues. In contrast to most other aminoacylation systems, the discriminator base is not directly involved in identity. Transplantation of these elements in tRNAAsp and tRNAPhe converts specificity toward glycine albeit conservation of nucleotide 73. Analysis of the functional interrelation of the identity elements shows coupling in synthetase recognition of the elements from anticodon and G10 whereas those from acceptor arm are recognized independently. Despite nondirect implication in identity, the discriminator base contributes cooperatively with C36 in specificity of glycylation. The link between the structural heterogeneity and the functional divergence of the glycylation systems and the phylogenic interrelation of these systems were approached by comparing the ability of GlyRSs of various phylae to glycylate heterologous tRNAGly. Dimeric GlyRSs from mammalian and archaebacteria acylate efficiently only eukaryotic and archaebacterial tRNAGly with a discriminatory A73, whereas tetrameric Escherichia coli GlyRS acylates only eubacterial tRNAGly with a discriminatory U73. In contrast, dimeric yeast GlyRS acylates efficiently both eukaryotic and archaebacterial tRNAGly as well as peculiar prokaryotic isoacceptors. Species specificity is lost with the dimeric GlyRS from Thermus thermophilus that acylates efficiently eubacterial, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic tRNAGly. These features are discussed in the context of the evolution of the glycylation systems and the phylogenic interrelation of the organisms.

Magnesium-dependent alternative foldings of active and inactive Escherichia coli tRNA(Glu) revealed by chemical probing

A stable conformer of Escherichia coli tRNA(Glu), obtained in the absence of Mg(2+), is inactive in the aminoacylation reaction. Probing it with diethylpyrocarbonate, dimethyl sulfate and ribonuclease V1 revealed that it has a hairpin structure with two internal loops; the helical segments at both extremities have the same structure as the acceptor stem and the anticodon arm of the native conformer of tRNA(Glu)and the middle helix is formed of nucleotides from the D-loop (G15-C20:2) and parts of the T-loop and stem (G51-C56), with G19 bulging out. This model is consistent with other known properties of this inactive conformer, including its capacity to dimerize. Therefore, this tRNA requires magnesium to acquire a conformation that can be aminoacylated, as others require a post-transcriptional modification to reach this active conformation.

Synthetase recognition determinants of E. coli valine transfer RNA

We have studied the interactions between Escherichia coli tRNAVal and valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS) by enzymatic footprinting with nuclease S1 and ribonuclease V1, and by analysis of the aminoacylation kinetics of mutant tRNAVal transcripts. Valyl-tRNA synthetase specifically protects the anticodon loop, the 3' side of the stacked T-stem/acceptor-stem helix, and the 5' side of the anticodon stem of tRNAVal against cleavage by double- and single-strand-specific nucleases. Increased nuclease susceptibility at the ends of the anticodon- and T-stems in the tRNAVal.ValRS complex is indicative of enzyme-induced conformational changes in the tRNA. The most important synthetase recognition determinants are the middle and 3' anticodon nucleotides (A35 and C36, respectively); G20, in the variable pocket, and G45, in the tRNA central core, are minor recognition elements. The discriminator base, position 73, and the anticodon stem also are recognized by ValRS. Replacing wild-type A73 with G73 reduces the aminoacylation efficiency more than 40-fold. However, the C73 and U73 mutants remain good substrates for ValRS, suggesting that guanosine at position 73 acts as a negative determinant. The amino acid acceptor arm of tRNAVal contains no other synthetase recognition nucleotides, but regular A-type RNA helix geometry in the acceptor stem is essential [Liu, M., et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4883-4890]. In the anticodon stem, converting the U29:A41 base pair to C29:G41 reduces the aminoacylation efficiency 50-fold. This is apparently due to the rigidity of the anticodon stem caused by the presence of five consecutive C:G base pairs, since the A29:U41 mutant is readily aminoacylated. Identity switch experiments provide additional evidence for a role of the anticodon stem in synthetase recognition. The valine recognition determinants, A35, C36, A73, G20, G45, and a regular A-RNA acceptor helix are insufficient to transform E. coli tRNAPhe into an effective valine acceptor. Replacing the anticodon stem of tRNAPhe with that of tRNAVal, however, converts the tRNA into a good substrate for ValRS. These experiments confirm G45 as a minor ValRS recognition element.

The identity determinants required for the discrimination between tRNAGlu and tRNAAsp by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli

We previously elucidated the major determinant set for Escherichia coli tRNAGlu identity (U34, U35, C36, A37, G1*C72, U2*A71, U11*A24, U13*G22**Alpha46, and Delta47) and showed that the set is sufficient to switch the identity of tRNAGln to Glu [Sekine, S., Nureki, O., Sakamoto, K., Niimi, T., Tateno, M., Go, M., Kohno, T., Brisson, A., Lapointe, J. & Yokoyama, S. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 256, 685-700]. In the present study, we attempted to switch the identity of tRNAAsp, which has a sequence similar to that of tRNAGlu, and consequently possesses many nucleotide residues corresponding to the Glu identity determinants (U35, C36, A37, G1*C72, and U11*A24). A simple transplantation of the rest of the major determinants (U34, U2*A71, U13*G22**Alpha46, and Delta47) to the framework of tRNAAsp did not result in a sufficient switch of the tRNAAsp identity to Glu. To confer an optimal glutamate accepting activity to tRNAAsp, two other elements, C4*G69 in the middle of the acceptor stem and C12*G23**C9 in the augmented D helix, were required. Consistently, the two base pairs, C4*G69 and C12*G23, in tRNAGlu had been shown to exist in the interface with glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) by phosphate-group footprinting. We also found the two elements in the framework of tRNAGln, and determined that their contributions successfully changed the identity of tRNAGln to Glu in the previous study. By the identity-determinant set (C4*G69 and C12*G23**C9 in addition to U34, U35, C36, A37, G1*C72, U2*A71, U11*A24, U13*G22**Alpha46, and Delta47) the activity of GluRS was optimized and efficient discrimination from the noncognate tRNAs was achieved.

Aminoacylation of hypomodified tRNAGlu in vivo

The highly specific interaction of each aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and its substrate tRNAs constitutes an intriguing problem in protein-RNA recognition. All tRNAs have the same overall three-dimensional structure in order to fit interchangeably into the translational apparatus. Thus, the recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase must be more or less limited to discrimination between bases at specific positions within the tRNA. The hypermodified nucleotide 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine (mnm5s2U) present at the wobble position of bacterial tRNAs specific for glutamic acid, lysine and possibly glutamine has been shown to be important in the recognition of these tRNAs by their synthetases in vitro. Here, we have determined the aminoacylation level in vivo of tRNAGlu, tRNALys, and tRNA1GIn in Escherichia coli strains containing undermodified derivatives of mnm5s2U34. Lack of the 5-methylaminomethyl group did not reduce charging levels for any of the three tRNAs. Lack of the s2U34 modification caused a 40% reduction in the charging level of tRNAGlu. Charging of tRNALys and tRNA1Gln were less affected. There was no compensating regulation of expression of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase because the relative synthesis rate was the same in the wild-type and mutant strains. These results indicate that the mnm5U34 modification is not an important recognition element in vivo for the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. In contrast, lack of the s2U34 modification reduced the efficiency of charging by at least 40%. This is the minimal estimate because the turn-over rate of Glu-tRNAGlu was also reduced in the absence of the 2-thio group. Lack of either modification did not affect mischarging or mistranslation.

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity

Correct expression of the genetic code at translation is directly correlated with tRNA identity. This survey describes the molecular signals in tRNAs that trigger specific aminoacylations. For most tRNAs, determinants are located at the two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few tRNAs, however, major identity signals are found in the core of the molecule. Identity elements have different strengths, often depend more on k cat effects than on K m effects and exhibit additive, cooperative or anti-cooperative interplay. Most determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases, and chemical groups on bases or ribose moieties that make functional interactions have been identified in several systems. Major determinants are conserved in evolution; however, the mechanisms by which they are expressed are species dependent. Recent studies show that alternate identity sets can be recognized by a single synthetase, and emphasize the importance of tRNA architecture and anti-determinants preventing false recognition. Identity rules apply to tRNA-like molecules and to minimalist tRNAs. Knowledge of these rules allows the manipulation of identity elements and engineering of tRNAs with switched, altered or multiple specificities.

Aminoacylation of tRNA gene transcripts is strongly affected by 3'-extended and dimeric substrate RNAs

Kinetic parameters of aminoacylation by E. coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase vary for phage T5 tRNA(Phe) gene transcript from 0.950 to 2.545 microM for Km and from 550 to 400 min(-1) for kcat. To reveal the source of this variability for various RNA preparations, homogeneity of the transcripts has been examined. Presence of 3' extensions and dimer formation in transcript preparations reduced the catalytic efficiency kcat/Km several-fold. We have shown that the proportion of dimers and 3'-extended transcripts in tRNA preparations is sensitive to single-base substitutions in tRNA. While wild-type phage T5 tRNA(Phe) gene transcript contains about half of dimeric molecules, for some mutants this value increases up to 90% or drops to 0%. Phage T5 tRNA(Phe) gene with anticodon stem nucleotide substitutions used as a template in run-off transcription produces 5 times less 3'-extended molecules than the wild-type gene. In view of all these results kinetic parameters of aminoacylation reaction for many wild-type and mutant tRNA gene transcripts should be reevaluated.

Mirror image alternative interaction patterns of the same tRNA with either class I arginyl-tRNA synthetase or class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Gene cloning, overproduction and an efficient purification protocol of yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) as well as the interaction patterns of this protein with cognate tRNAArgand non-cognate tRNAAspare described. This work was motivated by the fact that the in vitro transcript of tRNAAspis of dual aminoacylation specificity and is not only aspartylated but also efficiently arginylated. The crystal structure of the complex between class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and tRNAAsp, as well as early biochemical data, have shown that tRNAAspis recognized by its variable region side. Here we show by footprinting with enzymatic and chemical probes that transcribed tRNAAspis contacted by class I ArgRS along the opposite D arm side, as is homologous tRNAArg, but with idiosyncratic interaction patterns. Besides protection, footprints also show enhanced accessibility of the tRNAs to the structural probes, indicative of conformational changes in the complexed tRNAs. These different patterns are interpreted in relation to the alternative arginine identity sets found in the anticodon loops of tRNAArgand tRNAAsp. The mirror image alternative interaction patterns of unmodified tRNAAspwith either class I ArgRS or class II AspRS, accounting for the dual identity of this tRNA, are discussed in relation to the class defining features of the synthetases. This study indicates that complex formation between unmodified tRNAAspand either ArgRS and AspRS is solely governed by the proteins.

Identity elements of Thermus thermophilus tRNA(Thr)

In this study, we identified nucleotides that specify aminoacylation of tRNA(Thr) by Thermus thermophilus threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) using in vitro transcripts. Mutation studies showed that the first base pair in the acceptor stem as well as the second and third positions of the anticodon are major identity elements of T. thermophilus tRNA(Thr), which are essentially the same as those of Escherichia coli tRNA(Thr). The discriminator base, U73, also contributed to the specific aminoacylation, but not the second base pair in the acceptor stem. These findings are in contrast to E. coli tRNA(Thr), where the second base pair is required for threonylation, with the discriminator base, A73, playing no roles. In addition, among several mutations at the third base pair in the acceptor stem, only the G3-U70 mutant was a poor substrate for ThrRS, suggesting that the G3-U70 wobble pair, which is the identity determinant of tRNA(Ala), acts as a negative element for ThrRS. Similar results were obtained in E. coli and yeast. Thus, this manner of rejection of tRNA(Ala) is also likely to have been retained in the threonine system throughout evolution.