Modulation of Lrp action in Escherichia coli by leucine: effects on non-specific binding of Lrp to DNA

A computational model of Pseudomonas syringae metabolism unveils a role for branched-chain amino acids in Arabidopsis leaf colonization

Bacterial pathogens adapt their metabolism to the plant environment to successfully colonize their hosts. In our efforts to uncover the metabolic pathways that contribute to the colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000), we created iPst19, an ensemble of 100 genome-scale network reconstructions of Pst DC3000 metabolism. We developed a novel approach for gene essentiality screens, leveraging the predictive power of iPst19 to identify core and ancillary condition-specific essential genes. Constraining the metabolic flux of iPst19 with Pst DC3000 gene expression data obtained from naïve-infected or pre-immunized-infected plants, revealed changes in bacterial metabolism imposed by plant immunity. Machine learning analysis revealed that among other amino acids, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) metabolism significantly contributed to the overall metabolic status of each gene-expression-contextualized iPst19 simulation. These predictions were tested and confirmed experimentally. Pst DC3000 growth and gene expression analysis showed that BCAAs suppress virulence gene expression in vitro without affecting bacterial growth. In planta, however, an excess of BCAAs suppress the expression of virulence genes at the early stages of infection and significantly impair the colonization of Arabidopsis leaves. Our findings suggesting that BCAAs catabolism is necessary to express virulence and colonize the host. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how plant immunity impacts Pst DC3000 metabolism, and how bacterial metabolism impacts the expression of virulence.

Escherichia coli Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein Bridges DNA In Vivo and Tunably Dissociates in the Presence of Exogenous Leucine

Feast-famine response proteins are a widely conserved class of global regulators in prokaryotes, the most highly studied of which is the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Lrp senses the environmental nutrition status and subsequently regulates up to one-third of the genes in E. coli, either directly or indirectly. Lrp exists predominantly as octamers and hexadecamers (16mers), where leucine is believed to shift the equilibrium toward the octameric state. In this study, we analyzed the effects of three oligomerization state mutants of Lrp in terms of their ability to bind to DNA and regulate gene expression in response to exogenous leucine. We find that oligomerization beyond dimers is required for Lrp's regulatory activity and that, contrary to previous speculation, exogenous leucine modulates Lrp activity at its target promoters exclusively by inhibiting Lrp binding to DNA. We also show evidence that Lrp binding bridges DNA over length scales of multiple kilobases, revealing a new range of mechanisms for Lrp-mediated transcriptional regulation. IMPORTANCE Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is one of the most impactful regulators in E. coli and other bacteria. Lrp senses nutrient conditions and responds by controlling strategies for virulence, cellular motility, and nutrient acquisition. Despite its importance and being evolutionarily highly conserved across bacteria and archaea, several mysteries remain regarding Lrp, including how it actually responds to leucine to change its regulation of targets. Previous studies have led to the hypothesis that Lrp switches between two states, an octamer (8 Lrp molecules together) and a hexadecamer (16 Lrp molecules together), upon exposure to leucine; these are referred to as different oligomerization states. Here, we show that contrary to previous expectations, it is Lrp's propensity to bind DNA, rather than its oligomerization state, that is directly affected by leucine in the cell's environment. Our new understanding of Lrp activity will aid in identifying and disrupting pathways used by bacteria to cause disease.

Sensory Systems and Transcriptional Regulation in Escherichia coli

In free-living bacteria, the ability to regulate gene expression is at the core of adapting and interacting with the environment. For these systems to have a logic, a signal must trigger a genetic change that helps the cell to deal with what implies its presence in the environment; briefly, the response is expected to include a feedback to the signal. Thus, it makes sense to think of genetic sensory mechanisms of gene regulation. Escherichia coli K-12 is the bacterium model for which the largest number of regulatory systems and its sensing capabilities have been studied in detail at the molecular level. In this special issue focused on biomolecular sensing systems, we offer an overview of the transcriptional regulatory corpus of knowledge for E. coli that has been gathered in our database, RegulonDB, from the perspective of sensing regulatory systems. Thus, we start with the beginning of the information flux, which is the signal’s chemical or physical elements detected by the cell as changes in the environment; these signals are internally transduced to transcription factors and alter their conformation. Signals transduced to effectors bind allosterically to transcription factors, and this defines the dominant sensing mechanism in E. coli. We offer an updated list of the repertoire of known allosteric effectors, as well as a list of the currently known different mechanisms of this sensing capability. Our previous definition of elementary genetic sensory-response units, GENSOR units for short, that integrate signals, transport, gene regulation, and the biochemical response of the regulated gene products of a given transcriptional factor fit perfectly with the purpose of this overview. We summarize the functional heterogeneity of their response, based on our updated collection of GENSORs, and we use them to identify the expected feedback as part of their response. Finally, we address the question of multiple sensing in the regulatory network of E. coli. This overview introduces the architecture of sensing and regulation of native components in E.coli K-12, which might be a source of inspiration to bioengineering applications.

Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein in Acetic Acid Bacteria Is Stable and Functions at a Wide Range of Intracellular pH Levels

Acetic acid bacteria grow while producing acetic acid, resulting in acidification of the culture. Limited reports elucidate the effect of changes in intracellular pH on transcriptional factors. In the present study, the intracellular pH of Komagataeibacter europaeus was monitored with a pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein, showing that the intracellular pH decreased from 6.3 to 4.7 accompanied by acetic acid production during cell growth. The leucine-responsive regulatory protein of K. europaeus (KeLrp) was used as a model to examine pH-dependent effects, and its properties were compared with those of the Escherichia coli ortholog (EcLrp) at different pH levels. The DNA-binding activities of EcLrp and KeLrp with the target DNA (Ec-ilvI and Ke-ilvI) were examined by gel mobility shift assays under various pH conditions. EcLrp showed the highest affinity with the target at pH 8.0 (K_d [dissociation constant], 0.7 μM), decreasing to a minimum of 3.4 μM at pH 4.0. Conversely, KeLrp did not show significant differences in binding affinity between pH 4 and 7 (K_d, 1.0 to 1.5 μM), and the highest affinity was at pH 5.0 (K_d, 1.0 μM). Circular dichroism spectroscopy revealed that the α-helical content of KeLrp was the highest at pH 5.0 (49%) and was almost unchanged while being maintained at >45% over a range of pH levels examined, while that of EcLrp decreased from its maximum (49% at pH 7.0) to its minimum (36% at pH 4.0). These data indicate that KeLrp is stable and functions over a wide range of intracellular pH levels. IMPORTANCE Lrp is a highly conserved transcriptional regulator found in bacteria and archaea and regulates transcriptions of various genes. The intracellular pH of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) changes accompanied by acetic acid production during cell growth. The Lrp of AAB K. europaeus (KeLrp) was structurally stable over a wide range of pH and maintained DNA-binding activity even at low pH compared with Lrp from E. coli living in a neutral environment. An in vitro experiment showed DNA-binding activity of KeLrp to the target varied with changes in pH. In AAB, change of the intracellular pH during a cell growth would be an important trigger in controlling the activity of Lrp in vivo.

Escherichia coli Lrp Regulates One-Third of the Genome via Direct, Cooperative, and Indirect Routes

The global regulator Lrp plays a crucial role in regulating metabolism, virulence, and motility in response to environmental conditions. Lrp has previously been shown to activate or repress approximately 10% of the genes in Escherichia coli However, the full spectrum of targets, and how Lrp acts to regulate them, have stymied earlier study. We have combined matched chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) under nine physiological conditions to comprehensively map the binding and regulatory activity of Lrp as it directs responses to nutrient abundance. In addition to identifying hundreds of novel Lrp targets, we observe two new global trends, as follows: first, that Lrp will often bind to promoters in a poised position under conditions when it has no regulatory activity to enable combinatorial interactions with other regulators, and second, that nutrient levels induce a global shift in the equilibrium between less-sequence-specific and more-sequence-specific DNA binding. The overall regulatory behavior of Lrp, which as we now show extends to 38% of E. coli genes directly or indirectly under at least one condition, thus arises from the interaction between changes in Lrp binding specificity and cooperative action with other regulators.IMPORTANCE To survive, bacteria such as E. coli must rapidly respond to changing environmental conditions, including nutrient levels. A decrease in nutrient availability causes bacteria to stop rapid replication and enter stationary phase, where they perform limited to no cell division. The E. coli global regulatory protein Lrp has been previously implicated in modulating the expression of genes particularly important at this transition from rapid to slowed growth. Here, we monitor Lrp's DNA binding locations and effect on gene expression under three different nutrient conditions across three growth stages. We find that Lrp's role is even broader than previously suspected and that it appears to interact with many other bacterial regulators to perform its function in a condition-specific manner.

Expression of the alaE gene is positively regulated by the global regulator Lrp in response to intracellular accumulation of l-alanine in Escherichia coli

The alaE gene in Escherichia coli encodes an l-alanine exporter that catalyzes the active export of l-alanine using proton electrochemical potential. In our previous study, alaE expression was shown to increase in the presence of l-alanyl-l-alanine (Ala-Ala). In this study, the global regulator leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) was identified as an activator of the alaE gene. A promoter less β-galactosidase gene was fused to an alaE upstream region (240 nucleotides). Cells that were lacZ-deficient and harbored this reporter plasmid showed significant induction of β-galactosidase activity (approximately 17-fold) in the presence of 6 mM l-alanine, l-leucine, and Ala-Ala. However, a reporter plasmid possessing a smaller alaE upstream region (180 nucleotides) yielded transformants with strikingly low enzyme activity under the same conditions. In contrast, lrp-deficient cells showed almost no β-galactosidase induction, indicating that Lrp positively regulates alaE expression. We next performed an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and a DNase I footprinting assay using purified hexahistidine-tagged Lrp (Lrp-His). Consequently, we found that Lrp-His binds to the alaE upstream region spanning nucleotide -161 to -83 with a physiologically relevant affinity (apparent K_D, 288.7 ± 83.8 nM). Furthermore, the binding affinity of Lrp-His toward its cis-element was increased by l-alanine and l-leucine, but not by Ala-Ala and d-alanine. Based on these results, we concluded that the gene expression of the alaE is regulated by Lrp in response to intracellular levels of l-alanine, which eventually leads to intracellular homeostasis of l-alanine concentrations.

Expanded roles of leucine-responsive regulatory protein in transcription regulation of the Escherichia coli genome: Genomic SELEX screening of the regulation targets

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a transcriptional regulator for the genes involved in transport, biosynthesis and catabolism of amino acids in Escherichia coli. In order to identify the whole set of genes under the direct control of Lrp, we performed Genomic SELEX screening and identified a total of 314 Lrp-binding sites on the E. coli genome. As a result, the regulation target of Lrp was predicted to expand from the hitherto identified genes for amino acid metabolism to a set of novel target genes for utilization of amino acids for protein synthesis, including tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthases and rRNAs. Northern blot analysis indicated alteration of mRNA levels for at least some novel targets, including the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes. Phenotype MicroArray of the lrp mutant indicated significant alteration in utilization of amino acids and peptides, whilst metabolome analysis showed variations in the concentration of amino acids in the lrp mutant. From these two datasets we realized a reverse correlation between amino acid levels and cell growth rate: fast-growing cells contain low-level amino acids, whilst a high level of amino acids exists in slow-growing cells. Taken together, we propose that Lrp is a global regulator of transcription of a large number of the genes involved in not only amino acid transport and metabolism, but also amino acid utilization.

Recognition of DNA by the helix-turn-helix global regulatory protein Lrp is modulated by the amino terminus

The AsnC/Lrp family of regulatory proteins links bacterial and archaeal transcription patterns to metabolism. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates approximately 400 genes, over 200 of them directly. In earlier studies, lrp genes from Vibrio cholerae, Proteus mirabilis, and E. coli were introduced into the same E. coli background and yielded overlapping but significantly different regulons. These differences were seen despite amino acid sequence identities of 92% (Vibrio) and 98% (Proteus) to E. coli Lrp, including complete conservation of the helix-turn-helix motifs. The N-terminal region contains many of the sequence differences among these Lrp orthologs, which led us to investigate its role in Lrp function. Through the generation of hybrid proteins, we found that the N-terminal diversity is responsible for some of the differences between orthologs in terms of DNA binding (as revealed by mobility shift assays) and multimerization (as revealed by gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifugation). These observations indicate that the N-terminal tail plays a significant role in modulating Lrp function, similar to what is seen for a number of other regulatory proteins.

An overview of prokaryotic transcription factors : a summary of function and occurrence in bacterial genomes

Transcriptional initiation is arguably the most important control point for gene expression. It is regulated by a combination of factors, including DNA sequence and its three-dimensional topology, proteins and small molecules. In this chapter, we focus on the trans-acting factors of bacterial regulation. Initiation begins with the recruitment of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme to a specific locus upstream of the gene known as its promoter. The sigma factor, which is a component of the holoenzyme, provides the most fundamental mechanisms for orchestrating broad changes in gene expression state. It is responsible for promoter recognition as well as recruiting the holoenzyme to the promoter. Distinct sigma factors compete with for binding to a common pool of RNA polymerases, thus achieving condition-dependent differential expression. Another important class of bacterial regulators is transcription factors, which activate or repress transcription of target genes typically in response to an environmental or cellular trigger. These factors may be global or local depending on the number of genes and range of cellular functions that they target. The activities of both global and local transcription factors may be regulated either at a post-transcriptional level via signal-sensing protein domains or at the level of their own expression. In addition to modulating polymerase recruitment to promoters, several global factors are considered as "nucleoid-associated proteins" that impose structural constraints on the chromosome by altering the conformation of the bound DNA, thus influencing other processes involving DNA such as replication and recombination. This chapter concludes with a discussion of how regulatory interactions between transcription factors and their target genes can be represented as a network.

Unexpected coregulator range for the global regulator Lrp of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis

The Lrp/AsnC family of transcription factors links gene regulation to metabolism in bacteria and archaea. Members of this family, collectively, respond to a wide range of amino acids as coregulators. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates over 200 genes directly and is well known to respond to leucine and, to a somewhat lesser extent, alanine. We focused on Lrp from Proteus mirabilis and E. coli, orthologs with 98% identity overall and identical helix-turn-helix motifs, for which a previous study nevertheless found functional differences. Sequence differences between these orthologs, within and adjacent to the amino acid-responsive RAM domain, led us to test for differential sensitivity to coregulatory amino acids. In the course of this investigation, we found, via in vivo reporter fusion assays and in vitro electrophoretic mobility shift experiments, that E. coli Lrp itself responded to a broader range of amino acids than was previously appreciated. In particular, for both the E. coli and P. mirabilis orthologs, Lrp responsiveness to methionine was similar in magnitude to that to leucine. Both Lrp orthologs are also fairly sensitive to Ile, His, and Thr. These observations suggest that Lrp ties gene expression in the Enterobacteriaceae rather extensively to physiological status, as reflected in amino acid pools. These findings also have substantial implications for attempts to model regulatory architecture from transcriptome measurements or to infer such architecture from genome sequences, and they suggest that even well-studied regulators deserve ongoing exploration.

Dissecting the expression patterns of transcription factors across conditions using an integrated network-based approach

In prokaryotes, regulation of gene expression is predominantly controlled at the level of transcription. Transcription in turn is mediated by a set of DNA-binding factors called transcription factors (TFs). In this study, we map the complete repertoire of ∼300 TFs of the bacterial model, Escherichia coli, onto gene expression data for a number of nonredundant experimental conditions and show that TFs are generally expressed at a lower level than other gene classes. We also demonstrate that different conditions harbor varying number of active TFs, with an average of about 15% of the total repertoire, with certain stress and drug-induced conditions exhibiting as high as one-third of the collection of TFs. Our results also show that activators are more frequently expressed than repressors, indicating that activation of promoters might be a more common phenomenon than repression in bacteria. Finally, to understand the association of TFs with different conditions and to elucidate their dynamic interplay with other TFs, we develop a network-based framework to identify TFs which act as markers, defined as those which are responsible for condition-specific transcriptional rewiring. This approach allowed us to pinpoint several marker TFs as being central in various specialized conditions such as drug induction or growth condition variations, which we discuss in light of previously reported experimental findings. Further analysis showed that a majority of identified markers effectively control the expression of their regulons and, in general, transcriptional programs of most conditions can be effectively rewired by a very small number of TFs. It was also found that closeness is a key centrality measure which can aid in the successful identification of marker TFs in regulatory networks. Our results suggest the utility of the network-based approaches developed in this study to be applicable for understanding other interactomic data sets.

Transcriptional regulation shapes the organization of genes on bacterial chromosomes

Transcription factors (TFs) are the key elements responsible for controlling the expression of genes in bacterial genomes and when visualized on a genomic scale form a dense network of transcriptional interactions among themselves and with other protein coding genes. Although the structure of transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) is well understood, it is not clear what constrains govern them. Here, we explore this question using the TRNs of model prokaryotes and provide a link between the transcriptional hierarchy of regulons and their genome organization. We show that, to drive the kinetics and concentration gradients, TFs belonging to big and small regulons, depending on the number of genes they regulate, organize themselves differently on the genome with respect to their targets. We then propose a conceptual model that can explain how the hierarchical structure of TRNs might be ultimately governed by the dynamic biophysical requirements for targeting DNA-binding sites by TFs. Our results suggest that the main parameters defining the position of a TF in the network hierarchy are the number and chromosomal distances of the genes they regulate and their protein concentration gradients. These observations give insights into how the hierarchical structure of transcriptional networks can be encoded on the chromosome to drive the kinetics and concentration gradients of TFs depending on the number of genes they regulate and could be a common theme valid for other prokaryotes, proposing the role of transcriptional regulation in shaping the organization of genes on a chromosome.

Regulation of virulence by butyrate sensing in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) colonizes and proliferates at the mucosal surface, inducing severe diarrhoea. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are abundant in the intestine owing to the metabolic activity of microflora, and are important for colonic health. We found that, although a high concentration of SCFAs inhibited the growth of EHEC, at low concentrations, the SCFAs markedly enhanced the expression of the virulence genes required for cell adherence and the induction of attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions. Of the SCFAs tested, butyrate markedly enhanced the expression of these virulence-associated genes, even at the low concentration of 1.25 mM, but acetate and propionate showed only a small effect at concentrations higher than 40 mM. Butyrate enhanced the promoter activity of the LEE1 operon, which encodes a global regulator of the LEE genes, Ler. This enhancement was dependent on a regulator, PchA. Butyrate sensing was completely abrogated by the deletion of lrp, the gene for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp. Expression of a constitutively active mutant of Lrp enhanced the expression of the LEE genes in the absence of butyrate, and a response-defective Lrp derivative reduced the response to butyrate. Thus, upon entering the distal ileum, EHEC may respond to the higher butyrate level via Lrp by increasing its virulence expression, leading to efficient colonization of the target niche.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) acts as a virulence repressor in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global gene regulator that influences expression of a large number of genes including virulence-related genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. No systematic studies examining the regulation of virulence genes by Lrp have been reported in Salmonella. We report here that constitutive expression of Lrp [lrp(Con)] dramatically attenuates Salmonella virulence while an lrp deletion (Deltalrp) mutation enhances virulence. The lrp(Con) mutant caused pleiotropic effects that include defects in invasion, cytotoxicity, and colonization, whereas the Deltalrp mutant was more proficient at these activities than the wild-type strain. We present evidence that Lrp represses transcription of key virulence regulator genes--hilA, invF, and ssrA--in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and 2 (SPI-2), by binding directly to their promoter regions, P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). In addition, Western blot analysis showed that the expression of the SPI-1 effector SipA was reduced in the lrp(Con) mutant and enhanced in the Deltalrp mutant. Computational analysis revealed putative Lrp-binding consensus DNA motifs located in P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). These results suggest that Lrp binds to the consensus motifs and modulates expression of the linked genes. The presence of leucine enhanced Lrp binding to P(invF) in vitro and the addition of leucine to growth medium decreased the level of invF transcription. However, leucine had no effect on expression of hilA and ssrA or on cellular levels of Lrp. In addition, Lrp appears to be an antivirulence gene, since the deletion mutant showed enhanced cell invasion, cytotoxicity, and hypervirulence in BALB/c mice.

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, modulates microcin J25 intrinsic resistance in Escherichia coli by regulating expression of the YojI microcin exporter

Many Escherichia coli K-12 strains display an intrinsic resistance to the peptide antibiotic microcin J25. In this study, we present results showing that the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, is involved in this phenotype by acting as a positive regulator of YojI, a chromosomally encoded efflux pump which expels microcin out of cells. Exogenous leucine antagonizes the effect of Lrp, leading to a diminished expression of the pump and an increased susceptibility to microcin J25.

Competitive Lrp and Dam assembly at the pap regulatory region: implications for mechanisms of epigenetic regulation

Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) and Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) are key regulators of the pap operon, which codes for the pilus proteins necessary for uropathogenic E. coli cellular adhesion. The pap operon is regulated by a phase variation mechanism in which the methylation states of two GATC sites in the pap regulatory region and the binding position of Lrp determine whether the pilus genes are expressed. The post-replicative reassembly of Dam, Lrp, and the local regulator PapI onto a hemimethylated pap intermediate is a critical step of the phase variation switching mechanism and is not well understood. We show that Lrp, in the presence and in the absence of PapI and nonspecific DNA, specifically protects pap regulatory GATC sites from Dam methylation when allowed to compete with Dam for assembly on unmethylated and hemimethylated pap DNA. The methylation protection is dependent upon the concentration of Lrp and does not occur with non-regulatory GATC sites. Our data suggest that only at low Lrp concentrations will Dam compete effectively for binding and methylation of the proximal GATC site, leading to a phase switch resulting in the expression of pili.

The role of high affinity non-specific DNA binding by Lrp in transcriptional regulation and DNA organization

Transcriptional regulatory proteins typically bind specific DNA sequences with approximately 10(3)-10(7)-fold higher affinity than non-specific DNA and this discrimination is essential for their in vivo function. Here we show that the bacterial leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) does not follow this trend and has a approximately 20-400-fold binding discrimination between specific and non-specific DNA sequences. We suggest that the dual function of Lrp to regulate genes and to organize DNA utilizes this unique property. A approximately 20-fold decrease in binding affinity from specific DNA is dependent upon cryptic binding sites, including the sequence GN(2-3)TTT and A-tracts. Removal of these sites still results in high binding affinity, only approximately 70-fold weaker than that of specific sites. Similar to Lrp's binding of specific sites in the pap and ilvIH promoters, Lrp binds cooperatively to non-specific DNA; thus, protein/protein interactions are important for both specific and non-specific DNA binding. When considering this cooperativity of Lrp binding, the binding selectivity to specific sites may increase to a maximum of approximately 400-fold. Neither leucine nor the pap-specific local regulator PapI alter Lrp's non-specific binding affinity or cooperative binding of non-specific DNA. We hypothesize that Lrp combines low sequence discrimination and relatively high intracellular protein concentrations to ensure its ability to regulate the transcription of specific genes while also functioning as a nucleoid-associated protein. Modeling of Lrp binding data and comparison to other proteins with regulatory and nucleoid-associated properties suggests similar mechanisms.

Structure of the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein Lrp reveals a novel octameric assembly

The structure of Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) co-crystallized with a short duplex oligodeoxynucleotide reveals a novel quaternary assembly in which the protein octamer forms an open, linear array of four dimers. In contrast, structures of the Lrp homologs LrpA, LrpC and AsnC crystallized in the absence of DNA show that these proteins instead form highly symmetrical octamers in which the four dimers form a closed ring. Although the DNA is disordered within the Lrp crystal, comparative analyses suggest that the observed differences in quaternary state may arise from DNA interactions during crystallization. Interconversion of these conformations, possibly in response to DNA or leucine binding, provides an underlying mechanism to alter the relative spatial orientation of the DNA-binding domains. Breaking of the closed octamer symmetry may be a common essential step in the formation of active DNA complexes by all members of the Lrp/AsnC family of transcriptional regulatory proteins.

Role of LrpC from Bacillus subtilis in DNA transactions during DNA repair and recombination

Bacillus subtilis LrpC is a sequence-independent DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein, which binds both single-stranded (ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA and facilitates the formation of higher order protein–DNA complexes in vitro. LrpC binds at different sites within the same DNA molecule promoting intramolecular ligation. When bound to separate molecules, it promotes intermolecular ligation, and joint molecule formation between a circular ssDNA and a homologous ssDNA-tailed linear dsDNA. LrpC binding showed a higher affinity for 4-way (Holliday) junctions in their open conformation, when compared with curved dsDNA. Consistent with these biochemical activities, an lrpC null mutant strain rendered cells sensitive to DNA damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, and showed a segregation defect. These findings collectively suggest that LrpC may be involved in DNA transactions during DNA repair and recombination.

Stochastic modeling of the phase-variable pap operon regulation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Regulation of the pap operon in uropathogenic Escherichia coli is phase variable. This phase variation arises from competition between regulatory proteins at two sites within the regulatory region, GATC(dist) and GATC(prox). We have used the available literature data to design a stochastic model of the molecular interactions of pap regulation and expression during growth in a non-glucose environment at 37 degrees C. The resulting wild-type model is consistent with reported data. The wild-type model served as a basis for two "in silico" mutant models for investigating the role of key regulatory components, the GATC(dist) binding site and the PapI interaction with Lrp at the GATC(prox) site. Our results show that competition at GATC(dist) is required for phase variation, as previously reported. However, our results suggest that removal of competition at GATC(dist) does not affect initial state dependence. Additionally, the PapI involvement in Lrp translocation from GATC(prox) to GATC(dist) is required for the initial state dependence but not for phase variation. Our results also predict that pap expression is maximized at low growth rates and minimized at high growth rates. These predictions provide a basis for further experimental investigation.

Markov Chain modeling of pyelonephritis-associated pili expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli

Pyelonephritis-associated pili (Pap) expression in uropathogenic Escherichia coli is regulated by a complex phase variation mechanism involving the competition between leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and DNA adenine methylase (Dam). Population dynamics of pap gene expression has been studied extensively and the detailed molecular mechanism has been largely elucidated, providing sufficient information for mathematical modeling. Although the Gillespie algorithm is suited for modeling of stochastic systems such as the pap operon, it becomes computationally expensive when detailed molecular steps are explicitly modeled in a population. Here we developed a Markov Chain model to simplify the computation. Our model is analytically derived from the molecular mechanism. The model presented here is able to reproduce results presented using the Gillespie method, but since the regulatory information is incorporated before simulation, our model runs more efficiently and allows investigation of additional regulatory features. The model predictions are consistent with experimental data obtained in this work and in the literature. The results show that pap expression in uropathogenic E. coli is initial-state-dependent, as previously reported. However, without environment stimuli, the pap-expressing fraction in a population will reach an equilibrium level after approximately 50-100 generations. The transient time before reaching equilibrium is determined by PapI stability and Lrp and Dam copy numbers per cell. This work demonstrates that the Markov Chain model captures the essence of the complex molecular mechanism and greatly simplifies the computation.

Cooperative binding of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) to DNA

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) of Escherichia coli activates expression of a number of operons and represses expression of others. For some members of the Lrp regulon, exogenous leucine mitigates the effect of Lrp, for some it potentiates the effect of Lrp, and for others it has no effect on Lrp action. For the ilvIH operon that we study, Lrp activates expression in vivo and mediates the repression of the operon by exogenous leucine. We studied Lrp-1, a leucine-insensitive variant, to investigate mechanisms by which leucine alters Lrp action as an activator of ilvIH expression. The Asp114Glu change did not have much effect on the amount of total Lrp-1 in cells but decreased the amount of free Lrp-1 two- to threefold. Lrp monomers associate to form octamers and hexadecamers (hexadecamer form predominates at micromolar concentrations; Kd=5.27x10(-8) M), and leucine promotes the dissociation of Lrp hexadecamer to a leucine-bound octamer. By contrast, Lrp-1 exists primarily as an octamer in solution (equilibrium dissociation constant 6.5x10(-5) M) and leucine had little effect on the equilibrium. Thus, the hexadecameric form that Lrp assumes in the absence of DNA is not required for activation of the ilvIH operon. Both leucine and the lrp-1 mutation reduced the apparent affinity of Lrp binding to ilvIH DNA (contains two groups of binding sites separated by 136 bp) but they have different effects on intrinsic binding affinity and binding cooperativity. Whereas leucine reduced intrinsic binding affinities and interactions of Lrps bound at upstream and downstream regions of ilvIH DNA, it increased cooperative dimer-dimer interactions of Lrps bound to two adjacent sites. By contrast, the lrp-1 mutation did not have much effect on intrinsic binding affinities but it decreased cooperative adjacent dimer-dimer interactions and enhanced interactions of Lrps bound at upstream and downstream regions of ilvIH DNA. Our analysis is consistent with the idea that leucine enhances dimer-dimer interactions that contribute to octamer formation, concomitantly reducing dimer-dimer interactions that contribute to the longer range interactions of Lrps that are required for activation of the ilvIH promoter.

Influence of environmental cues on transcriptional regulation of foo and clp coding for F165(1) and CS31A adhesins in Escherichia coli

F165(1) (foo) and CS31A (clp) are bacterial adhesins synthesized by Escherichia coli strains associated with diarrhea and septicemia in piglets and calves. They belong to the P-regulatory family and as such are subject to a phase variation control mediated by Lrp (leucine responsive regulatory protein) and regulators homologous to PapI. Analysis of expression of transcriptional fusions between the fooB or fooI promoters and lacZ showed that Lrp is an activator of foo and fooI transcription, whereas it represses clp transcription. Furthermore, foo phase variation leads to a large majority of phase-ON cells, whereas clp phase variation leads to a majority of phase-OFF cells. We compared the influence of several environmental cues on foo and clp expression, with special attention to the effects of leucine and alanine known to be mediated by Lrp. Inhibition or significant repression of foo and clp transcription was observed at low temperature, in LB medium, and in the presence of glucose, alanine, or leucine. Glucose repression of foo but not of clp was totally relieved by addition of cAMP. Osmolarity and pH had little effect. Alanine but not leucine, and LB medium inhibited foo and clp phase variation, locking cells in the OFF phase. Low temperature inhibited clp phase variation and altered the switch frequency of foo phase variation, leading to more phase-OFF cells. Glucose altered the phase variation of both operons, increasing the number of phase-OFF cells in the population. The regulation pattern of foo and clp is consistent with F165(1) and CS31A production in low nutrient environments, even at moderately acidic pH or high osmolarity.

The Lrp family of transcriptional regulators

Genome analysis has revealed that members of the Lrp family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, both bacteria and archaea. The archetype Leucine-responsive Regulatory Protein from Escherichia coli is a global regulator involved in modulating a variety of metabolic functions, including the catabolism and anabolism of amino acids as well as pili synthesis. Most Lrp homologues, however, appear to act as specific regulators of amino acid metabolism-related genes. Like most prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, Lrp-like regulators consist of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain. The crystal structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA revealed an N-terminal domain with a common helix-turn-helix fold, and a C-terminal domain with a typical alphabeta-sandwich fold. The latter regulatory domain constitutes a novel ligand-binding site and has been designated RAM. Database analysis reveals that the RAM domain is present in many prokaryotic genomes, potentially encoding (1) Lrp-homologues, when fused to a DNA-binding domain (2) enzymes, when fused as a potential regulatory domain to a catalytic domain, and (3) stand-alone RAM modules with unknown function. The architecture of Lrp regulators with two distinct domains that harbour the regulatory (effector-binding) site and the active (DNA-binding) site, and their separation by a flexible hinge region, suggests a general allosteric switch of Lrp-like regulators.

Self-perpetuating epigenetic pili switches in bacteria

Bacteria have developed an epigenetic phase variation mechanism to control cell surface pili-adhesin complexes between heritable expression (phase ON) and nonexpression (phase OFF) states. In the pyelonephritis-associated pili (pap) system, global regulators [catabolite gene activator protein (CAP), leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), DNA adenine methylase (Dam)] and local regulators (PapI and PapB) control phase switching. Lrp binds cooperatively to three pap DNA binding sites, sites 1-3, proximal to the papBA pilin promoter in phase OFF cells, whereas Lrp is bound to sites 4-6 distal to papBA in phase ON cells. Two Dam methylation targets, GATC(prox) and GATC(dist), are located in Lrp binding sites 2 and 5, respectively. In phase OFF cells, binding of Lrp at sites 1-3 inhibits methylation of GATC(prox), forming the phase OFF DNA methylation pattern (GATC(dist) methylated, GATC(prox) nonmethylated). Binding of Lrp at sites 1-3 blocks pap pili transcription and reduces the affinity of Lrp for sites 4-6. Together with methylation of GATC(dist), which inhibits Lrp binding at sites 4-6, the phase OFF state is maintained. We hypothesize that transition to the phase ON state requires DNA replication to dissociate Lrp and generate a hemimethyated GATC(dist) site. PapI and methylation of GATC(prox) act together to increase the affinity of Lrp for sites 4-6. Binding of Lrp at the distal sites protects GATC(dist) from methylation, forming the phase ON methylation pattern (GATC(dist) nonmethyated, GATC(prox) methylated). Lrp binding at sites 4-6 together with cAMP-CAP binding 215.5 bp upstream of the papBA transcription start, is required for activation of pilin transcription. The first gene product of the papBA transcript, PapB, helps maintain the switch in the ON state by activating papI transcription, which in turn maintains Lrp binding at sites 4-6.

ilvIH operon expression in Escherichia coli requires Lrp binding to two distinct regions of DNA

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein Lrp regulates the expression of a number of operons in Escherichia coli, including the ilvIH operon. Earlier in vitro experiments showed purified Lrp binding to two regions of DNA proximal to the ilvIH promoter, an upstream region (-260 to -190) and a downstream region (-150 to -40). The effect of mutations in these regions on ilvIH promoter expression in vivo led to the proposal that activation of transcription required Lrp binding to downstream sites 3, 4, 5, and 6. Binding of Lrp to upstream sites 1 and 2 seemed to enhance promoter expression but was not absolutely required (Q. Wang and J. M. Calvo, J. Mol. Biol. 229:306-318, 1993). Here we present data that require a reevaluation of the above conclusion. Constructs having either a deletion of DNA or a 100-bp substitution of DNA upstream of position -160 showed no ilvIH promoter activity in vivo. These results unambiguously establish that DNA at or upstream of position -160 is required for ilvIH promoter expression. Together with previous results, we conclude that Lrp bound at downstream sites is necessary but not sufficient for promoter activation. In addition, insertion of 4, 6, 8, or 10 bp between the upstream and downstream regions also resulted in a very strong reduction of in vivo promoter expression, even though the binding of Lrp in vitro was not greatly affected by these mutations. Closer inspection showed that the affinity of Lrp for the upstream region of all of these constructs was about the same but that Lrp bound to the downstream region of the wild-type construct with a higher degree of cooperativity than in the case of the others. These mutations may have reduced promoter activity in vivo by eliminating a binding site for some transcription factor other than Lrp. Alternatively, the small-addition mutations may have affected the geometry of these complexes, preventing either an interaction between Lrps bound at upstream and downstream sites (which might be necessary for promoter expression) or preventing the positioning of Lrp bound at upstream sites for productive interaction with the promoter.

Leucine-induced dissociation of Escherichia coli Lrp hexadecamers to octamers

Lrp is a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli that helps cells respond to changes in environmental conditions. The action of Lrp as a transcriptional activator or repressor is sometimes affected when the medium contains exogenous leucine. In this study, we examined the thermodynamics of leucine binding to Lrp and to a leucine response mutant, Lrp-1, and leucine-induced dissociation of Lrp hexadecamer to leucine-bound octamer. The results of dynamic light-scattering and fluorescence measurements suggest that Lrp has two leucine-binding sites, one a high-affinity site and the other a low-affinity site that is coupled to the dissociation reaction. The Gibbs free energy change for leucine binding to the high-affinity site is about -7.0 kcal/mol. Binding of two leucine molecules to low-affinity sites on the hexadecamer or one leucine molecule to one octamer induces the dissociation of hexadecamer to leucine-bound octamer. The Gibbs free energy change for leucine binding to the low-affinity site was estimated to be in the range -4.66 to -5.03 kcal/mol for leucine binding to an octamer or -6.01 to -6.75 kcal/mol for leucine binding to a hexadecamer. The thermodynamic parameters derived from this study were used together with other data to estimate the distribution of free Lrp hexadecamer, octamer, leucine-bound hexadecamer, and leucine-bound octamer in cells. Mathematical modeling, employed to simulate modulation of Lrp action in response to growth conditions, gave results that are consistent with known patterns of Lrp action on different operons.