Each administration of cyclosporin A enhances skin microvascular reactivity in renal transplant recipients

Effect of cyclosporine on blood pressure

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent used for different autoimmune diseases. The official Canadian indications for cyclosporine are solid organ transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and nephritic syndrome (e-CPS 2008). The expanding range of indications for cyclosporine therapy will lead to more patients receiving chronic therapy with possible side effects, hypertension being one of the most common. Therefore it is essential to know the magnitude of increase of blood pressure (BP) associated with cyclosporine in order to appropriately manage patients receiving the drug.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine on blood pressure, compared to placebo in randomized trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE (2000-2008) and EMBASE (1980-2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Selection was made using double-blind, randomized, controlled trials comparing cyclosporine to placebo. All patients treated with cyclosporine were included without restriction by type of disease or by age and sex.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Blood pressure measurements in any setting and by any means were acceptable including the auscultatory or oscillometric method with a preference for the sitting position. Mean blood pressure results were entered as mean change from placebo and standard error of the mean (SEM). If blood pressure data was provided at different times after the initiation of cyclosporine therapy the weighted mean BP change from placebo from all measurements was used.

MAIN RESULTS

The search yielded 1340 citations, of which 17 trials met the inclusion criteria. We created dose-ranges according to the usual dose administration recommended by the manufacturer and allocated the 17 included trials to the corresponding dose-range. The results demonstrate a highly statistically significant increase in blood pressure associated with cyclosporine. There appears to be a dose-related effect with lower doses (1-4 mg/kg/d) increasing mean BP by an average of 5 mmHg and higher doses (>10 mg/kg/d) increasing mean BP by 11 mmHg on average. Furthermore in 3 trials the effect appears to be similar after a single dose as with chronic therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine statistically significantly increases blood pressure compared to placebo in a dose-related fashion. The magnitude of increase in blood pressure is clinically significant and increases the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure and other adverse cardiovascular events associated with elevated BP. Consequently prescribers should try to find the lowest effective dose in all patients receiving cyclosporine chronically.

Calcineurin inhibitor effects on glucose metabolism and endothelial function following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are involved in the development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Changes in insulin secretion and sensitivity contribute to the development of PTDM and are associated with endothelial function.

METHODS

In a pre-defined substudy of a previously published randomized trial in renal transplant recipients we compared the effect of CNI treatment (n = 23) with complete CNI-avoidance (n = 21) on insulin secretion and sensitivity (oral glucose tolerance test) as well as endothelial function (laser Doppler flowmetry), 10 wk and 12 months following transplantation.

RESULTS

Insulin sensitivity differed 10 wk post-transplant and was significantly better after 12 months in patients never treated with CNI drugs [0.091 (0.050) vs. 0.083 (0.036) micromol/kg/min/pmol/L, p = 0.043]. Insulin secretion tended to be higher in CNI treated patients at both time points (p = 0.068). Endothelial function was not significantly different at week 10 [540 (205) vs. 227 (565) arbitary units x minutes, p = 0.35] or month 12 [510 (620) vs. 243 (242), p = 0.33].

CONCLUSIONS

Findings in the present study indicate that long-term CNI treatment negatively affects glucose metabolism and this may contribute to the increased risk for premature cardiovascular disease in CNI treated renal transplant recipients. Further studies to elucidate this hypothesis are, however, needed.

Association between insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is a common finding in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and is related to impaired local regulation of vasodilative and vasoconstrictive substances, such as nitric monoxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1). In non-transplanted patients, an association between impaired endothelial function and insulin resistance has been shown. Whether such an association also exists in RTR is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to examine whether insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction in RTR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 47 RTR in a stable phase six yr post-transplant were included in the statistical analysis. The immunosuppressive therapy was based on cyclosporine and prednisolone. Non-invasive assessment of endothelial function was performed with laser Doppler flowmetry of the forearm skin vasculature after local acetylcholine stimulation. Oral glucose tolerance tests comprising both glucose and insulin measurements were used to calculate insulin sensitivity (IS) indices. NO, ET-1 and von Willebrand factor were measured in fasting plasma samples.

RESULTS

Normal glucose tolerance was found in 31 RTR. In these subjects, both IS (r(2) = 0.164, p = 0.044) and plasma NO (r(2) = 0.326, p = 0.002) were significantly correlated with endothelial function. Patients with glucose intolerance (n = 16) had higher plasma ET-1 and lower NO levels, but the association between IS and endothelial function was not significant in these subjects. In the total patient cohort, IS and endothelial function tended to be correlated (p = 0.127).

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial dysfunction is significantly associated with insulin resistance in normoglycemic RTR but explains a rather small part of the variation. In glucose-intolerant recipients, IS appears to be more critically dependent on other factors not revealed in the present study.

Fluvastatin reduces atherogenic lipids without any effect on native endothelial function early after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular risk is greatly increased in renal transplant recipients. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy may reduce cardiovascular risk by improving both dyslipidemia and endothelial function. We therefore performed this study to assess the effect of fluvastatin on endothelial function in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind designed study investigated the effect of fluvastatin on endothelial function. Thirty-seven recipients received fluvastatin 40 mg/d and 35 received placebo during the first 12 wk following transplantation. All patients initially received cyclosporin A, prednisolone and azathioprine. At the end of treatment, endothelial function was assessed in the forearm skin microvasculature by laser Doppler flowmetry following acetylcholine stimulation. Samples were taken for measurements of serum lipids and vasoactive markers.

RESULTS

There were no differences in endothelial function between fluvastatin recipients and controls, AUCACh was 656 +/- 479 and 627 +/- 518 AU min, respectively (fluv vs. control, p > 0.65). In the placebo limb, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol increased 22 +/- 12% and 22 +/- 18%, respectively in the first 12 wk following transplantation. The respective values were 18 +/- 13% (p = 0.010) and 34 +/- 19% (p = 0.0013) lower at 12 wk in the fluvastatin treated patients. Plasma ET-1, BigET-1 and urinary excretion of cGMP were not significantly different between treatment groups (p > 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Although fluvastatin 40 mg/d significantly lowers cholesterol it does not affect endothelial function the first 3 months after renal transplantation. The lack of effect on endothelial function is consistent with a lack of effect on vasoactive substances.

Atorvastatin improves endothelial function in renal-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidaemia and endothelial dysfunction are common features in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients. Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the risk of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular death in these patients. A beneficial effect of statin therapy beyond cholesterol lowering may be an improvement of endothelial function. The present study was designed to assess the effect of atorvastatin on serum lipids and endothelial function in CsA treated renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

This pilot study was an open trial of 4 weeks atorvastatin (10 mg per day) treatment in renal transplant recipients (n=22). All patients received a CsA- and prednisolone-based immunosuppressive regimen. Endothelial function was assessed in the forearm skin microvasculature by acetylcholine stimulation and laser Doppler flowmetry, before and after atorvastatin treatment. Serum lipids, plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), and von Willebrand factor (vWF) were also measured.

RESULTS

Both total and LDL cholesterol were significantly reduced by 26.8 +/- 8.4 and 41.5 +/- 11.0% respectively, after 4 weeks of treatment. Endothelial function was significantly improved during atorvastatin treatment, area under the flux versus time curve (AUC)(ACh) was 538 +/- 362 AU x min before and 682 +/- 276 AU x min after treatment (P=0.042). Plasma NO levels also showed a borderline significant increase from 49 +/- 30 to 57 +/- 37 micromol/l during the treatment period (P=0.051), though plasma ET-1 (0.37+/-0.08 vs 0.37+/-0.12 fmol/ml) and vW (196+/-57 vs 197+/-37%) were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin lowered serum cholesterol significantly and improved endothelial function in renal transplant recipients after 4 weeks of treatment. Plasma NO levels were increased during atorvastatin treatment, indicating a possible endothelial protective effect through an "endothelial-NO pathway".

Better microvascular function on long-term treatment with lisinopril than with nifedipine in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of hypertension in renal transplant recipients is high but the pathophysiology is poorly defined. Impaired endothelial function may be a factor of major importance. The present study addresses the effects of long-term treatment with either lisinopril or slow-release nifedipine on microvascular function and plasma endothelin in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporin A (CsA).

METHODS

Seventy-five hypertensive renal transplant recipients were double-blind randomized to receive slow-release nifedipine (NIF, n=40) or lisinopril (LIS, n=35). Ten normotensive, age-matched recipients served as controls. All patients received CsA-based immunosuppressive therapy including prednisolone and azathioprine. Microvascular function was assessed in the forearm skin vasculature, using laser Doppler flowmetry in combination with post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia and endothelial-dependent function during local acetylcholine (ACh) stimulation.

RESULTS

The analysis of microvascular function (AUC(rh)) showed that nifedipine-treated patients had significantly lower responses compared with lisinopril-treated patients (20+/-17 and 43+/-20 AU x min respectively, P=0.0016). Endothelial function was borderline significantly lower in the NIF group compared with the LIS group (640+/-345 and 817+/-404 AU x min respectively, P=0.056). The responses in the LIS group were comparable with those in non-hypertensive controls (AUC(rh) was 37+/-16 and AUC(ACh) was 994+/-566 AU x min). Plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were significantly higher in the NIF group compared with the LIS group (0.44+/-0.19 vs. 0.34+/-0.10 fmol/ml respectively, P=0.048), and were 0.29+/-0.09 fmol/ml in the control patients. AUC(ACh) was associated with plasma endothelin-1 (P=0.0053), while AUC(rh) was not (P=0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates that long-term treatment with lisinopril, when compared with nifedipine, yields a more beneficial effect on microvascular function in hypertensive renal transplant recipients on CsA. The beneficial microvascular effect may be mediated in part by an endothelin-1-associated effect on the endothelium.