Receptors involved in microenvironment-driven molecular evolution of cancer cells

Engaging Ly-6A/Sca-1 triggers lipid raft-dependent and -independent responses in CD4+ T-cell lines

INTRODUCTION

The lymphocyte antigen 6 (Ly-6) supergene family encodes proteins of 12-14 kda in molecular mass that are either secreted or anchored to the plasma membrane through a glycosyl-phosphatidylinisotol (GPI) lipid anchor at the carboxy-terminus. The lipidated GPI-anchor allows localization of Ly-6 proteins to the 10-100 nm cholesterol-rich nano-domains on the membrane, also known as lipid rafts. Ly-6A/Sca-1, a member of Ly-6 gene family is known to transduce signals despite the absence of transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. It is hypothesized that the localization of Ly-6A/Sca-1 with in lipid rafts allows this protein to transduce signals to the cell interior.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, we found that cross-linking mouse Ly-6A/Sca-1 protein with a monoclonal antibody results in functionally distinct responses that occur simultaneously. Ly-6A/Sca-1 triggered a cell stimulatory response as gauged by cytokine production with a concurrent inhibitory response as indicated by growth inhibition and apoptosis. While production of interleukin 2 (IL-2) cytokine by CD4⁺ T cell line in response to cross-linking Ly-6A/Sca-1 was dependent on the integrity of lipid rafts, the observed cell death occurred independently of it. Growth inhibited CD4⁺ T cells showed up-regulated expression of the inhibitory cell cycle protein p27^kip but not of p53. In addition, Ly-6A/Sca-1 induced translocation of cytochrome C to the cytoplasm along with activated caspase 3 and caspase 9, thereby suggesting an intrinsic apoptotic cell death mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that opposing responses with differential dependence on the integrity of lipid rafts are triggered by engaging Ly-6A/Sca-1 protein on the membrane of transformed CD4⁺ T cells.

Loss of Nkx3.1 leads to the activation of discrete downstream target genes during prostate tumorigenesis

The expression of NKX3.1, a transcriptional regulator and tumor suppressor gene in prostate cancer, is downregulated during early stages of prostate tumorigenesis. However, little is known of the alterations in gene expression that occur as a result of this event. We combined laser capture microdissection and gene expression profiling to analyze the molecular consequences of Nkx3.1 loss during prostate cancer initiation using Nkx3.1-deficient mice. This analysis identified a cohort of genes (loss-of-Nkx3.1 signature) that are aberrantly overexpressed during loss-of-Nkx3.1 driven tumor initiation. We studied the expression of these same genes in independent loss-of-Pten and c-myc overexpression prostate adenocarcinoma mouse models. Nkx3.1 expression is lost in prostate epithelial proliferation in both of these mouse models. However, Nkx3.1 loss is an early event of tumor development in the loss-of-Pten model, whereas it occurs at later stages in c-myc transgenic mice. A member of genes of the loss-of-Nkx3.1 signature, like clusterin and quiescin Q6, are highly expressed in prostatic hyperplasia and intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions that also lack Nkx3.1 in the Pten-deficient prostate, but not in similar lesions in the c-myc transgenic model. Meta-analysis of multiple prostate cancer gene expression datasets including those from loss-of-Nkx3.1, loss-of-Pten, c-myc overexpression, and constitutively active Akt prostate cancer models, further confirmed that genes associated with the loss-of-Nkx3.1 signature integrate with Pten-Akt signaling pathways, but do not overlap with molecular changes associated with the c-myc signaling pathway. In human prostate tissue samples, loss of NKX3.1 expression and corresponding clusterin overexpression are co-localized at sites of prostatic inflammatory atrophy, a possible very early stage of human prostate tumorigenesis. Collectively, these results suggest that the molecular consequences of NKX3.1 loss depend on the epithelial proliferative stage at which its expression is lost and, that alterations in the Pten-Akt-Nkx3.1 axis are important for prostate cancer initiation.

Tumor-microenvironment interactions: dangerous liaisons

The interaction between microenvironmental components and tumor cells is bidirectional. Tumor cells and their products are capable of regulating and altering gene expression in nontumor cells residing in or infiltrating into the microenvironment and exert selective pressures on such cells, thereby shaping their phenotype. Conversely, microenvironmental components regulate gene expression in tumor cells thereby directing the tumor into one or several possible molecular evolution pathways, some of which may lead to metastasis. This review summarizes six instances in which the tumor liaises with different components of its microenvironment. These liaisons result, in most cases, in enhanced tumor progression. In these cases (responses of tumor and nontumor cells to microenvironmental stress, the interaction of the tumor with fibroblasts, endothelial cells and macrophages, the formation of the metastatic niche, and the interaction of the tumor with immunoglobulins) the tumor, directly or indirectly, alters the phenotype of its interaction partners thereby enlisting them to promote its progression. Does the tumor need all these pathways to form metastasis? Is there a hierarchy of interactions with respect to impact on tumor progression? These questions remain open. They may be answered by approaches employed in the analysis of hypercomplex systems.

The tumor microenvironment in the post-PAGET era

The research area of tumor microenvironment is considered, at present, to be an important factor in tumorigenesis and especially in tumor progression. The present mini review is focused on three principles characterizing the nature of the tumor microenvironment. We first discuss the regulatory functions of the tumor microenvironment and the complexity of the combinatorial signaling pathways operating in it. We then address the aspect that the tumor microenvironment incorporates both pro and anti malignancy factors and that a balance between these factors regulates tumor progression. Thirdly we provide evidence that the non-tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment and their products may be different from those of their counterparts residing in non-tumor microenvironments. The conclusion of this mini review is that the tumor microenvironment, by exerting regulatory functions and selective pressures drives cancer cells into one of several molecular evolution pathways thereby determining and shaping their malignancy phenotype.

Expression of granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor in human colorectal cancer

AIMS

To discover if human colorectal cancer expresses granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) and if granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays an important part in the development and progression of human colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Forty two specimens of colorectal cancer and normal colorectal mucosa were investigated, taken from the colon or rectum in group of colorectal cancer patients. Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique were used to show G-CSFR expression. The relation between expression of G-CSFR and clinical or pathological factors was analysed.

RESULTS

Immucohistochemical analyses showed that G-CSFR was expressed in the human colorectal cancer (25 of 42, 59.52%) and seemed to be up-regulated compared with the normal mucosa (14 of 42, 33.33%, p<0.001). In pronounced contrast with mostly strongly positive tumours, corresponding normal colorectal mucosa was negative or weakly positive. A significant correlation was found between G-CSFR expression and tumour stage (p = 0.001), tumour differentiation (p<0.001), but there was no significant relation between the expression of G-CSFR and the age, sex, and tumour size (p = 0.346, p = 0.686, p = 0.459). In RT-PCR, 21 of all 42 tumours had G-CSFR mRNA expression, while only 11 of 42 normal colorectal mucosa had such expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that G-CSFR is commonly expressed in human colorectal cancers, thus supporting a possible role for G-CSF in colorectal cancer physiology.

Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis formation are associated with individual differences in behavior of inbred Lewis rats

There are large individual differences in cancer progression and it has been suggested that behavioral and psychological characteristics of cancer patients may contribute to the course of the disease. To get more insight in the contribution of behavioral characteristics to cancer progression, we investigated in rats, whether a stable behavioral trait characteristic is associated with NK cell activity, tumor angiogenesis, and tumor metastasis formation. Lewis rats were characterized based on locomotor activity in an open field. Rats in the upper and lower quartile were designated as high and low active rats. Low active animals had higher NK cell activity compared to their high active counterparts. In addition, we examined tumor angiogenesis by using a subcutaneous Matrigel implant containing MADB106 adenocarcinoma cells. Tumor Matrigel implants from low active animals contained significantly more hemoglobin compared to implants from high active animals, indicating a more pronounced angiogenic response in the low active animals. Finally, experimental lung metastasis formation was investigated by injecting MADB106 cells into the tail vein. Low active animals tended to develop more metastases. Moreover, low active animals developed significantly more tumors with a diameter larger than 2 mm, which is in line with higher angiogenic capacity. In conclusion, we demonstrated that individual differences in a stable behavioral trait are linked to individual differences in angiogenic capacity and tumor progression.