1
|
Van Rhijn I, Le Nours J. CD1 and MR1 recognition by human γδ T cells. Mol Immunol 2021; 133:95-100. [PMID: 33636434 PMCID: PMC8075093 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The two main T cell lineages, αβ and γδ T cells, play a central role in immunity. Unlike αβ T cells that recognize antigens bound to the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) or MHC class I-like antigen-presenting molecules, the ligands for γδ T cell receptors (TCRs) are much more diverse. However, it is now clear that γδ TCRs can also recognize MHC class I-like molecules, including CD1b, CD1c, CD1d and the MHC class I-related protein 1 (MR1). Yet, our understanding at the molecular level of γδ T cell immunity to CD1 and MR1 is still very limited. Here, we discuss new molecular paradigms underpinning γδ TCRs recognition of antigens, antigen-presenting molecules or both. The recent discovery of recognition of MR1 by a γδ TCR at a position located underneath the antigen display platform reinforces the view that γδ TCRs can approach their ligands from many directions, unlike αβ TCRs that bind MHC, CD1 and MR1 targets in an aligned, end to end fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ildiko Van Rhijn
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jérôme Le Nours
- Infection and Immunity Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Novel Molecular Insights into Human Lipid-Mediated T Cell Immunity. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22052617. [PMID: 33807663 PMCID: PMC7961386 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
T cells represent a critical arm of our immune defense against pathogens. Over the past two decades, considerable inroads have been made in understanding the fundamental principles underpinning the molecular presentation of peptide-based antigens by the Major Histocompatibility Complex molecules (MHC-I and II), and their molecular recognition by specialized subsets of T cells. However, some T cells can recognize lipid-based antigens presented by MHC-I-like molecules that belong to the Cluster of Differentiation 1 (CD1) family. Here, we will review the advances that have been made in the last five years to understand the molecular mechanisms orchestrating the presentation of novel endogenous and exogenous lipid-based antigens by the CD1 glycoproteins and their recognition by specific populations of CD1-reactive T cells.
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark K, Yau J, Bloom A, Wang J, Venzon DJ, Suzuki M, Pasquet L, Compton BJ, Cardell SL, Porcelli SA, Painter GF, Zajonc DM, Berzofsky JA, Terabe M. Structure-Function Implications of the Ability of Monoclonal Antibodies Against α-Galactosylceramide-CD1d Complex to Recognize β-Mannosylceramide Presentation by CD1d. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2355. [PMID: 31649670 PMCID: PMC6794452 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
iNKT cells are CD1d-restricted T cells recognizing lipid antigens. The prototypic iNKT cell-agonist α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) alongside compounds with similar structures induces robust proliferation and cytokine production of iNKT cells and protects against cancer in vivo. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that detect CD1d-α-GalCer complexes have provided critical information for understanding of antigen presentation of iNKT cell agonists. Although most iNKT cell agonists with antitumor properties are α-linked glycosphingolipids that can be detected by anti-CD1d-α-GalCer mAbs, β-ManCer, a glycolipid with a β-linkage, induces strong antitumor immunity via mechanisms distinct from those of α-GalCer. In this study, we unexpectedly discovered that anti-CD1d-α-GalCer mAbs directly recognized β-ManCer-CD1d complexes and could inhibit β-ManCer stimulation of iNKT cells. The binding of anti-CD1d-α-GalCer mAb with β-ManCer-CD1d complexes was also confirmed by plasmon resonance and could not be explained by α-anomer contamination. The binding of anti-CD1d-α-GalCer mAb was also observed with CD1d loaded with another β-linked glycosylceramide, β-GalCer (C26:0). Detection with anti-CD1d-α-GalCer mAbs indicates that the interface of the β-ManCer-CD1d complex exposed to the iNKT cell TCR can assume a structure like that of CD1d-α-GalCer, despite its disparate carbohydrate structure. These results suggest that certain β-linked monoglycosylceramides can assume a structural display similar to that of CD1d-α-GalCer and that the data based on anti-CD1d-α-GalCer binding should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Clark
- Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jessica Yau
- Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Anja Bloom
- Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Division of Immune Regulation, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - David J Venzon
- Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Motoshi Suzuki
- Biochemistry and Biophysics Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Lise Pasquet
- Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Benjamin J Compton
- The Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Susanna L Cardell
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Steven A Porcelli
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Gavin F Painter
- The Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Dirk M Zajonc
- Division of Immune Regulation, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jay A Berzofsky
- Vaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Masaki Terabe
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Natural killer T (NKT) cells are innate-like T cells that rapidly produce a variety of cytokines following T cell receptor (TCR) activation and can shape the immune response in many different settings. There are two main NKT cell subsets: type I NKT cells are typically characterized by the expression of a semi-invariant TCR, whereas the TCRs expressed by type II NKT cells are more diverse. This Review focuses on the defining features and emerging generalities regarding how NKT cells specifically recognize self, microbial and synthetic lipid-based antigens that are presented by CD1d. Such information is vitally important to better understand, and fully harness, the therapeutic potential of NKT cells.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wun KS, Ross F, Patel O, Besra GS, Porcelli SA, Richardson SK, Keshipeddy S, Howell AR, Godfrey DI, Rossjohn J. Human and mouse type I natural killer T cell antigen receptors exhibit different fine specificities for CD1d-antigen complex. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:39139-48. [PMID: 22995911 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.412320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Human and mouse type I natural killer T (NKT) cells respond to a variety of CD1d-restricted glycolipid antigens (Ags), with their NKT cell antigen receptors (NKT TCRs) exhibiting reciprocal cross-species reactivity that is underpinned by a conserved NKT TCR-CD1d-Ag docking mode. Within this common docking footprint, the NKT TCR recognizes, to varying degrees of affinity, a range of Ags. Presently, it is unclear whether the human NKT TCRs will mirror the generalities underpinning the fine specificity of the mouse NKT TCR-CD1d-Ag interaction. Here, we assessed human NKT TCR recognition against altered glycolipid ligands of α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) and have determined the structures of a human NKT TCR in complex with CD1d-4',4″-deoxy-α-GalCer and CD1d-α-GalCer with a shorter, di-unsaturated acyl chain (C20:2). Altered glycolipid ligands with acyl chain modifications did not affect the affinity of the human NKT TCR-CD1d-Ag interaction. Surprisingly, human NKT TCR recognition is more tolerant to modifications at the 4'-OH position in comparison with the 3'-OH position of α-GalCer, which contrasts the fine specificity of the mouse NKT TCR-CD1d-Ag recognition (4'-OH > 3'-OH). The fine specificity differences between human and mouse NKT TCRs was attributable to differing interactions between the respective complementarity-determining region 1α loops and the Ag. Accordingly, germline encoded fine-specificity differences underpin human and mouse type I NKT TCR interactions, which is an important consideration for therapeutic development and NKT cell physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwok S Wun
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antigen recognition by CD1d-restricted NKT T cell receptors. Semin Immunol 2009; 22:61-7. [PMID: 19945889 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2009] [Accepted: 10/26/2009] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
alphabeta T cell receptors (TCRs) have traditionally been viewed as receptors for peptide antigens presented by either Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I (for CD8 T cells) or MHC class II (for CD4 T cells) antigen-presenting molecules. However, it is now clear that some T cell lineages express TCRs that are specialized for recognition of lipid-based antigens presented by the MHC class I-like CD1 family. Recently, the molecular basis for the TCR recognition of glycolipid antigens presented by CD1d has revealed an evolutionarily conserved-docking mode that is distinct from that of peptide-based recognition. T cells carrying these receptors follow a unique developmental pathway that results not only in unconventional antigen specificity, but also seemingly exaggerated functional capabilities, which makes these cells and their antigens highly attractive targets for immunotherapeutic manipulation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Garcia KC, Adams JJ, Feng D, Ely LK. The molecular basis of TCR germline bias for MHC is surprisingly simple. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:143-7. [PMID: 19148199 PMCID: PMC3982143 DOI: 10.1038/ni.f.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The elusive etiology of germline bias of the T cell receptor (TCR) for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) has been clarified by recent 'proof-of-concept' structural results demonstrating the conservation of specific TCR-MHC interfacial contacts in complexes bearing common variable segments and MHC allotypes. We suggest that each TCR variable-region gene product engages each type of MHC through a 'menu' of structurally coded recognition motifs that have arisen through coevolution. The requirement for MHC-restricted T cell recognition during thymic selection and peripheral surveillance has necessitated the existence of such a coded recognition system. Given these findings, a reconsideration of the TCR-peptide-MHC structural database shows that not only have the answers been there all along but also they were predictable by the first principles of physical chemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Christopher Garcia
- Department of Molecular & Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|