Analysis of sumoylation

Stress-induced nuclear condensation of NELF drives transcriptional downregulation

In response to stress, human cells coordinately downregulate transcription and translation of housekeeping genes. To downregulate transcription, the negative elongation factor (NELF) is recruited to gene promoters impairing RNA polymerase II elongation. Here we report that NELF rapidly forms nuclear condensates upon stress in human cells. Condensate formation requires NELF dephosphorylation and SUMOylation induced by stress. The intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in NELFA is necessary for nuclear NELF condensation and can be functionally replaced by the IDR of FUS or EWSR1 protein. We find that biomolecular condensation facilitates enhanced recruitment of NELF to promoters upon stress to drive transcriptional downregulation. Importantly, NELF condensation is required for cellular viability under stressful conditions. We propose that stress-induced NELF condensates reported here are nuclear counterparts of cytosolic stress granules. These two stress-inducible condensates may drive the coordinated downregulation of transcription and translation, likely forming a critical node of the stress survival strategy.

Analysis of Sumoylation

Protein regulation by reversible attachment of SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) plays an important role in several cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, cell-cycle progression, meiosis, and DNA repair. However, most sumoylated proteins are of marginal abundance at steady state levels, which is due to strict regulation and/or rapid turnover of modification and de-modification. Consequently, analysis of protein sumoylation in vivo is very challenging. Nonetheless, a novel method was established that allows detection of sumoylated proteins at endogenous levels from vertebrate cells and tissues. This approach involves the enrichment of sumoylated proteins by immunoprecipitation followed by peptide elution. After endogenous substrate sumoylation is verified, addressing its functional consequences is the next logical step. This requires SUMO site mapping that benefits from larger quantities of modified protein. Here, we shortly describe strategies to achieve efficient in vitro sumoylation of many substrates.

SUMO conjugation - a mechanistic view

The regulation of protein fate by modification with the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) plays an essential and crucial role in most cellular pathways. Sumoylation is highly dynamic due to the opposing activities of SUMO conjugation and SUMO deconjugation. SUMO conjugation is performed by the hierarchical action of E1, E2 and E3 enzymes, while its deconjugation involves SUMO-specific proteases. In this review, we summarize and compare the mechanistic principles of how SUMO gets conjugated to its substrate. We focus on the interplay of the E1, E2 and E3 enzymes and discuss how specificity could be achieved given the limited number of conjugating enzymes and the thousands of substrates.

SUMOylation Regulates Growth Factor Independence 1 in Transcriptional Control and Hematopoiesis

Cell fate specification requires precise coordination of transcription factors and their regulators to achieve fidelity and flexibility in lineage allocation. The transcriptional repressor growth factor independence 1 (GFI1) is comprised of conserved Snail/Slug/Gfi1 (SNAG) and zinc finger motifs separated by a linker region poorly conserved with GFI1B, its closest homolog. Moreover, GFI1 and GFI1B coordinate distinct developmental fates in hematopoiesis, suggesting that their functional differences may derive from structures within their linkers. We show a binding interface between the GFI1 linker and the SP-RING domain of PIAS3, an E3-SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) ligase. The PIAS3 binding region in GFI1 contains a conserved type I SUMOylation consensus element, centered on lysine-239 (K239). In silico prediction algorithms identify K239 as the only high-probability site for SUMO modification. We show that GFI1 is modified by SUMO at K239. SUMOylation-resistant derivatives of GFI1 fail to complement Gfi1 depletion phenotypes in zebrafish primitive erythropoiesis and granulocytic differentiation in cultured human cells. LSD1/CoREST recruitment and MYC repression by GFI1 are profoundly impaired for SUMOylation-resistant GFI1 derivatives, while enforced expression of MYC blocks granulocytic differentiation. These findings suggest that SUMOylation within the GFI1 linker favors LSD1/CoREST recruitment and MYC repression to govern hematopoietic differentiation.

Systematic Localization and Identification of SUMOylation Substrates in Knock-In Mice Expressing Affinity-Tagged SUMO1

Protein SUMOylation is a posttranslational protein modification that is emerging as a key regulatory process in neurobiology. To date, however, SUMOylation in vivo has only been studied cursorily. Knock-in mice expressing His6-HA-SUMO1 from the Sumo1 locus allow for the highly specific localization and identification of endogenous SUMO1 substrates under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. By making use of the HA-tag and using wild-type mice for highly stringent negative control samples, SUMO1 targets can be specifically localized in and purified from cultured mouse nerve cells and mouse tissues.

SUMOylation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) regulates the expression of FXR target genes

BACKGROUND

Small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO) are covalently conjugated to other proteins including nuclear receptors leading to modification of various cellular processes.

RESULTS

Ligand-dependent SUMOylation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) negatively regulates the expression of its target genes.

CONCLUSION

SUMO modification attenuates the capacity of FXR to function as a transcriptional activator.

SIGNIFICANCE

Defining post-translation modification of FXR bySUMOis important to understanding how this nuclear receptor functions in health and disease. The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) belongs to a family of ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate many aspects of metabolism including bile acid homeostasis. Here we show that FXR is covalently modified by the small ubiquitin-like modifier (Sumo1), an important regulator of cell signaling and transcription. Well conserved consensus sites at lysine 122 and 275 in the AF-1 and ligand binding domains, respectively, of FXR were subject to SUMOylation in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis showed that Sumo1 was recruited to the bile salt export pump (BSEP), the small heterodimer partner (SHP), and the OSTα-OSTβ organic solute transporter loci in a ligand-dependent fashion. Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-ReChIP) verified the concurrent binding of FXR and Sumo1 to the BSEP and SHP promoters. Overexpression of Sumo1 markedly decreased binding and/or recruitment of FXR to the BSEP and SHP promoters on ChIP-ReChIP. SUMOylation did not have an apparent effect on nuclear localization of FXR. Expression of Sumo1 markedly inhibited the ligand-dependent, transactivation of BSEP and SHP promoters by FXR/retinoid X receptor α (RXRα) in HepG2 cells. In contrast, mutations that abolished SUMOylation of FXR or siRNA knockdown of Sumo1 expression augmented the transactivation of BSEP and SHP promoters by FXR. Pathways for SUMOylation were significantly altered during obstructive cholestasis with differential Sumo1 recruitment to the promoters of FXR target genes. In conclusion, FXR is subject to SUMOylation that regulates its capacity to transactivate its target genes in normal liver and during obstructive cholestasis.

Lamin A/C mutants disturb sumo1 localization and sumoylation in vitro and in vivo

A-type lamins A and C are nuclear intermediate filament proteins in which mutations have been implicated in multiple disease phenotypes commonly known as laminopathies. A few studies have implicated sumoylation in the regulation of A-type lamins. Sumoylation is a post-translational protein modification that regulates a wide range of cellular processes through the attachment of small ubiquitin-related modifier (sumo) to various substrates. Here we showed that laminopathy mutants result in the mislocalization of sumo1 both in vitro (C2C12 cells overexpressing mutant lamins A and C) and in vivo (primary myoblasts and myopathic muscle tissue from the Lmna(H222P/H222P) mouse model). In C2C12 cells, we showed that the trapping of sumo1 in p.Asp192Gly, p.Gln353Lys, and p.Arg386Lys aggregates of lamin A/C correlated with an increased steady-state level of sumoylation. However, lamin A and C did not appear to be modified by sumo1. Our results suggest that mutant lamin A/C alters the dynamics of sumo1 and thus misregulation of sumoylation may be contributing to disease progression in laminopathies.

Effect of ON 01910.Na, an anticancer mitotic inhibitor, on cell-cycle progression correlates with RanGAP1 hyperphosphorylation

The benzyl styryl sulfone, ON 01910.Na, is a novel anticancer agent that inhibits mitotic progression and induces apoptosis in most cancer cell lines. We examined the effect of ON 01910.Na on DNA damage-signaling molecules upstream of Cdc25C (Chk1, Chk2, and H2AX), as well as on Ran GTPase-activating protein 1 conjugated to small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (RanGAP1·SUMO1), a mitosis coordinator. Prostate cancer, lymphoma, and leukemic cells were incubated with the drug for 4, 16, or 24 hours. Cell lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot. Camptothecin and doxorubicin treatment caused activation/phosphorylation of DNA damage-responsive molecules by 4 hours, whereas ON 01910.Na did not do so. ON 01910.Na caused hyperphosphorylation of RanGAP1·SUMO1 within 4 hours that was sustained for more than 24 hours. Mild phosphorylation of Chk2 was observed only after 24-hour exposure, indicating that DNA damage response was not an initial effect of ON 01910.Na. MOLT-3 cells, synchronized by double-thymidine block, when released into a medium containing ON 01910.Na, accumulated mitotic cell number with a peak from 10 to 14 hours and remained near plateau for 20 hours, which corresponded with the time of RanGAP phosphorylation. ON 01910.Na had minimal effects on tubulin polymerization. These findings imply that ON 01910.Na neither induces DNA damage directly nor acts as a tubulin toxin. Its biological activity appears to rely on prolonged phosphorylation/hyperphosphorylation of RanGAP1·SUMO1. M-phase arrest and the consequent induction of apoptosis that follows could possibly be attributed to it. ON 01910.Na may act as an inhibitor of a RanGAP1·SUMO1 phosphatase or a stimulant of a new kinase. RanGAP1·SUMO1 appears to be a new target pathway for cancer chemotherapy.

SUMOylation modulates the function of Aurora-B kinase

Aurora kinases are central regulators of mitotic-spindle assembly, chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Aurora B is a member of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) with crucial functions in regulation of the attachment of kinetochores to microtubules and in cytokinesis. We report here that Aurora B contains a conserved SUMO modification motif within its kinase domain. Aurora B can bind SUMO peptides in vitro when bound to the IN-box domain of its CPC partner INCENP. Mutation of Lys207 to arginine (Aurora B(K207R)) impairs the formation of conjugates of Aurora B and SUMO in vivo. Expression of the SUMO-null form of Aurora B results in abnormal chromosome segregation and cytokinesis failure and it is not able to rescue mitotic defects in Aurora-B-knockout cells. These defects are accompanied by increased levels of the CPC on chromosome arms and defective centromeric function, as detected by decreased phosphorylation of the Aurora-B substrate CENP-A. The Aurora-B(K207R) mutant does not display reduced kinase activity, suggesting that functional defects are probably a consequence of the altered localization, rather than decreased intrinsic kinase activity. These data suggest that SUMOylation of Aurora B modulates its function, possibly by mediating the extraction of CPC complexes from chromosome arms during prometaphase.

In vitro sumoylation of recombinant proteins and subsequent purification for use in enzymatic assays

The sumoylation reaction is mechanistically similar to ubiquitination. It is ATP-dependent and in vitro can be completed in two steps using purified E1 (SAE1/SAE2), E2 (ubc9), and SUMO. Even without the inclusion of an E3 ligase, many substrates can be modified at the same lysines in vitro as in vivo. Here we describe a simplified in vitro sumoylation protocol using recombinant sumoylation substrate, E1, E2, SUMO, and an ATP-regenerating system. The modified substrate can then be repurified from the reaction mixture in a single step to be used in assays to assess the impact of sumoylation on enzymatic and/or other activities.

Preparation of sumoylated substrates for biochemical analysis

Covalent modification of proteins with SUMO (small ubiquitin related modifier) affects many cellular processes like transcription, nuclear transport, DNA repair and cell cycle progression. Although hundreds of SUMO targets have been identified, for several of them the function remains obscure. In the majority of cases sumoylation is investigated via "loss of modification" analysis by mutating the relevant target lysine. However, in other cases this approach is not successful since mapping of the modification site is problematic or mutation does not cause an obvious phenotype. These latter cases ask for different approaches to investigate the target modification. One possibility is to choose the opposite approach, a "gain in modification" analysis by producing both SUMO modified and unmodified protein in vitro and comparing them in functional assays. Here, we describe the purification of the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2-25K, its in vitro sumoylation with recombinant enzymes and the subsequent separation and purification of the modified and the unmodified forms.