1
|
Luo S, Wohl S, Zheng W, Yang S. Biophysical and Integrative Characterization of Protein Intrinsic Disorder as a Prime Target for Drug Discovery. Biomolecules 2023; 13:biom13030530. [PMID: 36979465 PMCID: PMC10046839 DOI: 10.3390/biom13030530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Protein intrinsic disorder is increasingly recognized for its biological and disease-driven functions. However, it represents significant challenges for biophysical studies due to its high conformational flexibility. In addressing these challenges, we highlight the complementary and distinct capabilities of a range of experimental and computational methods and further describe integrative strategies available for combining these techniques. Integrative biophysics methods provide valuable insights into the sequence–structure–function relationship of disordered proteins, setting the stage for protein intrinsic disorder to become a promising target for drug discovery. Finally, we briefly summarize recent advances in the development of new small molecule inhibitors targeting the disordered N-terminal domains of three vital transcription factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuqi Luo
- Center for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Samuel Wohl
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Wenwei Zheng
- College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA
- Correspondence: (W.Z.); (S.Y.)
| | - Sichun Yang
- Center for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Correspondence: (W.Z.); (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hancock M, Peulen TO, Webb B, Poon B, Fraser JS, Adams P, Sali A. Integration of software tools for integrative modeling of biomolecular systems. J Struct Biol 2022; 214:107841. [PMID: 35149213 PMCID: PMC9278553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Integrative modeling computes a model based on varied types of input information, be it from experiments or prior models. Often, a type of input information will be best handled by a specific modeling software package. In such a case, we desire to integrate our integrative modeling software package, Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP), with software specialized to the computational demands of the modeling problem at hand. After several attempts, however, we have concluded that even in collaboration with the software's developers, integration is either impractical or impossible. The reasons for the intractability of integration include software incompatibilities, differing modeling logic, the costs of collaboration, and academic incentives. In the integrative modeling software ecosystem, several large modeling packages exist with often redundant tools. We reason, therefore, that the other development groups have similarly concluded that the benefit of integration does not justify the cost. As a result, modelers are often restricted to the set of tools within a single software package. The inability to integrate tools from distinct software negatively impacts the quality of the models and the efficiency of the modeling. As the complexity of modeling problems grows, we seek to galvanize developers and modelers to consider the long-term benefit that software interoperability yields. In this article, we formulate a demonstrative set of software standards for implementing a model search using tools from independent software packages and discuss our efforts to integrate IMP and the crystallography suite Phenix within the Bayesian modeling framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hancock
- Biophysics Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, MC 2240 1600 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF Box 0775 1700 4th St, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
| | - Thomas-Otavio Peulen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF Box 0775 1700 4th St, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
| | - Benjamin Webb
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF Box 0775 1700 4th St, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
| | - Billy Poon
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 33 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94270, United States.
| | - James S Fraser
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF Box 0775 1700 4th St, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States; Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| | - Paul Adams
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 33 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94270, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, MC 1762 306 Stanley Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF Box 0775 1700 4th St, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Box 2880 600 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States; Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), University of California, San Francisco, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McKenzie-Coe A, Montes NS, Jones LM. Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting: A Mass Spectrometry-Based Structural Method for Studying the Higher Order Structure of Proteins. Chem Rev 2021; 122:7532-7561. [PMID: 34633178 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Hydroxyl radical protein footprinting (HRPF) coupled to mass spectrometry has been successfully used to investigate a plethora of protein-related questions. The method, which utilizes hydroxyl radicals to oxidatively modify solvent-accessible amino acids, can inform on protein interaction sites and regions of conformational change. Hydroxyl radical-based footprinting was originally developed to study nucleic acids, but coupling the method with mass spectrometry has enabled the study of proteins. The method has undergone several advancements since its inception that have increased its utility for more varied applications such as protein folding and the study of biotherapeutics. In addition, recent innovations have led to the study of increasingly complex systems including cell lysates and intact cells. Technological advances have also increased throughput and allowed for better control of experimental conditions. In this review, we provide a brief history of the field of HRPF and detail recent innovations and applications in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan McKenzie-Coe
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
| | - Nicholas S Montes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
| | - Lisa M Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kursula P. Small-angle X-ray scattering for the proteomics community: current overview and future potential. Expert Rev Proteomics 2021; 18:415-422. [PMID: 34210208 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2021.1951242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Proteins are biological nanoparticles. For structural proteomics and hybrid structural biology, complementary methods are required that allow both high throughput and accurate automated data analysis. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is a method for observing the size and shape of particles, such as proteins and complexes, in solution. SAXS data can be used to model both the structure, oligomeric state, conformational changes, and flexibility of biomolecular samples.Areas covered: The key principles of SAXS, its sample requirements, and its current and future applications for structural proteomics are briefly reviewed. Recent technical developments in SAXS experiments are discussed, and future potential of the method in structural proteomics is evaluated.Expert opinion: SAXS is a method suitable for several aspects of integrative structural proteomics, with current technical developments allowing for higher throughput and time-resolved studies, as well as the analysis of complex samples, such as membrane proteins. Increasing automation and streamlined data analysis are expected to equip SAXS for structure-based screening workflows. Originally, structural genomics had a heavy focus on folded, crystallizable proteins and complexes - SAXS is a method allowing an expansion of this focus to flexible and disordered systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petri Kursula
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Biocenter Oulu & Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sali A. From integrative structural biology to cell biology. J Biol Chem 2021; 296:100743. [PMID: 33957123 PMCID: PMC8203844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrative modeling is an increasingly important tool in structural biology, providing structures by combining data from varied experimental methods and prior information. As a result, molecular architectures of large, heterogeneous, and dynamic systems, such as the ∼52-MDa Nuclear Pore Complex, can be mapped with useful accuracy, precision, and completeness. Key challenges in improving integrative modeling include expanding model representations, increasing the variety of input data and prior information, quantifying a match between input information and a model in a Bayesian fashion, inventing more efficient structural sampling, as well as developing better model validation, analysis, and visualization. In addition, two community-level challenges in integrative modeling are being addressed under the auspices of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB). First, the impact of integrative structures is maximized by PDB-Development, a prototype wwPDB repository for archiving, validating, visualizing, and disseminating integrative structures. Second, the scope of structural biology is expanded by linking the wwPDB resource for integrative structures with archives of data that have not been generally used for structure determination but are increasingly important for computing integrative structures, such as data from various types of mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, optical microscopy, proteomics, and genetics. To address the largest of modeling problems, a type of integrative modeling called metamodeling is being developed; metamodeling combines different types of input models as opposed to different types of data to compute an output model. Collectively, these developments will facilitate the structural biology mindset in cell biology and underpin spatiotemporal mapping of the entire cell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Sali
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, the Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, the Quantitative Biosciences Institute (QBI), and the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chance MR, Farquhar ER, Yang S, Lodowski DT, Kiselar J. Protein Footprinting: Auxiliary Engine to Power the Structural Biology Revolution. J Mol Biol 2020; 432:2973-2984. [PMID: 32088185 PMCID: PMC7245549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Structural biology is entering an exciting time where many new high-resolution structures of large complexes and membrane proteins are determined regularly. These advances have been driven by over fifteen years of technology advancements, first in macromolecular crystallography, and recently in Cryo-electron microscopy. These structures are allowing detailed questions about functional mechanisms of the structures, and the biology enabled by these structures, to be addressed for the first time. At the same time, mass spectrometry technologies for protein structure analysis, "footprinting" studies, have improved their sensitivity and resolution dramatically and can provide detailed sub-peptide and residue level information for validating structures and interactions or understanding the dynamics of structures in the context of ligand binding or assembly. In this perspective, we review the use of protein footprinting to extend our understanding of macromolecular systems, particularly for systems challenging for analysis by other techniques, such as intrinsically disordered proteins, amyloidogenic proteins, and other proteins/complexes so far recalcitrant to existing methods. We also illustrate how the availability of high-resolution structural information can be a foundation for a suite of hybrid approaches to divine structure-function relationships beyond what individual techniques can deliver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Chance
- Case Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, USA; Case Center for Synchrotron Biosciences, USA; Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | | | - Sichun Yang
- Case Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, USA; Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - David T Lodowski
- Case Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, USA; Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Janna Kiselar
- Case Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, USA; Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rout MP, Sali A. Principles for Integrative Structural Biology Studies. Cell 2020; 177:1384-1403. [PMID: 31150619 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Integrative structure determination is a powerful approach to modeling the structures of biological systems based on data produced by multiple experimental and theoretical methods, with implications for our understanding of cellular biology and drug discovery. This Primer introduces the theory and methods of integrative approaches, emphasizing the kinds of data that can be effectively included in developing models and using the nuclear pore complex as an example to illustrate the practice and challenges involved. These guidelines are intended to aid the researcher in understanding and applying integrative structural methods to systems of their interest and thus take advantage of this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Rout
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, Byers Hall, 1700 4th Street, Suite 503B, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berman HM, Adams PD, Bonvin AA, Burley SK, Carragher B, Chiu W, DiMaio F, Ferrin TE, Gabanyi MJ, Goddard TD, Griffin PR, Haas J, Hanke CA, Hoch JC, Hummer G, Kurisu G, Lawson CL, Leitner A, Markley JL, Meiler J, Montelione GT, Phillips GN, Prisner T, Rappsilber J, Schriemer DC, Schwede T, Seidel CAM, Strutzenberg TS, Svergun DI, Tajkhorshid E, Trewhella J, Vallat B, Velankar S, Vuister GW, Webb B, Westbrook JD, White KL, Sali A. Federating Structural Models and Data: Outcomes from A Workshop on Archiving Integrative Structures. Structure 2019; 27:1745-1759. [PMID: 31780431 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Structures of biomolecular systems are increasingly computed by integrative modeling. In this approach, a structural model is constructed by combining information from multiple sources, including varied experimental methods and prior models. In 2019, a Workshop was held as a Biophysical Society Satellite Meeting to assess progress and discuss further requirements for archiving integrative structures. The primary goal of the Workshop was to build consensus for addressing the challenges involved in creating common data standards, building methods for federated data exchange, and developing mechanisms for validating integrative structures. The summary of the Workshop and the recommendations that emerged are presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Berman
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Bridge Institute, Michelson Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | - Paul D Adams
- Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720-8235, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Alexandre A Bonvin
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Stephen K Burley
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Bridget Carragher
- Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Wah Chiu
- Department of Bioengineering, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5447, USA; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Thomas E Ferrin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Margaret J Gabanyi
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Thomas D Goddard
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | - Juergen Haas
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Hanke
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jeffrey C Hoch
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
| | - Gerhard Hummer
- Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Institute for Biophysics, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Genji Kurisu
- Protein Data Bank Japan (PDBj), Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Catherine L Lawson
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Alexander Leitner
- Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - John L Markley
- BioMagResBank (BMRB), Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, 465 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37221, USA
| | - Gaetano T Montelione
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytech Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
| | - George N Phillips
- BioSciences at Rice and Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, USA
| | - Thomas Prisner
- Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Center of Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Juri Rappsilber
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, Scotland
| | - David C Schriemer
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Robson DNA Science Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Torsten Schwede
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Dmitri I Svergun
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Hamburg Outstation, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Emad Tajkhorshid
- Department of Biochemistry, NIH Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics, Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Jill Trewhella
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Brinda Vallat
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Geerten W Vuister
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Leicester Institute of Structural and Chemical Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Benjamin Webb
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - John D Westbrook
- Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Kate L White
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Bridge Institute, Michelson Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vallat B, Webb B, Westbrook J, Sali A, Berman HM. Archiving and disseminating integrative structure models. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2019; 73:385-398. [PMID: 31278630 PMCID: PMC6692293 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-019-00264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Limitations in the applicability, accuracy, and precision of individual structure characterization methods can sometimes be overcome via an integrative modeling approach that relies on information from all available sources, including all available experimental data and prior models. The open-source Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) is one piece of software that implements all computational aspects of integrative modeling. To maximize the impact of integrative structures, the coordinates should be made publicly available, as is already the case for structures based on X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and electron microscopy. Moreover, the associated experimental data and modeling protocols should also be archived, such that the original results can easily be reproduced. Finally, it is essential that the integrative structures are validated as part of their publication and deposition. A number of research groups have already developed software to implement integrative modeling and have generated a number of structures, prompting the formation of an Integrative/Hybrid Methods Task Force. Following the recommendations of this task force, the existing PDBx/mmCIF data representation used for atomic PDB structures has been extended to address the requirements for archiving integrative structural models. This IHM-dictionary adds a flexible model representation, including coarse graining, models in multiple states and/or related by time or other order, and multiple input experimental information sources. A prototype archiving system called PDB-Dev ( https://pdb-dev.wwpdb.org ) has also been created to archive integrative structural models, together with a Python library to facilitate handling of integrative models in PDBx/mmCIF format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brinda Vallat
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Piscataway, USA
| | - Benjamin Webb
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - John Westbrook
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Piscataway, USA
- RCSB Protein Data Bank, Piscataway, USA
| | - Andrej Sali
- RCSB Protein Data Bank, Piscataway, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
- Lead Contacts, San Francisco, USA.
| | - Helen M Berman
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
- Lead Contacts, Piscataway, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A Metastable Contact and Structural Disorder in the Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Domain. Structure 2018; 27:229-240.e4. [PMID: 30581045 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2018.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The N-terminal transactivation domain (NTD) of estrogen receptor alpha, a well-known member of the family of intrinsically disordered proteins, mediates the receptor's transactivation function. However, an accurate molecular dissection of NTD's structure-function relationships remains elusive. Here, we show that the NTD adopts a mostly disordered, unexpectedly compact conformation that undergoes structural expansion on chemical denaturation. By combining small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical protein footprinting, and computational modeling, we derive the ensemble-structures of the NTD and determine its ensemble-contact map revealing metastable long-range contacts, e.g., between residues I33 and S118. We show that mutation at S118, a known phosphorylation site, promotes conformational changes and increases coactivator binding. We further demonstrate via fluorine-19 (19F) nuclear magnetic resonance that mutations near I33 alter 19F chemical shifts at S118, confirming the proposed I33-S118 contact in the ensemble of structural disorder. These findings extend our understanding of how specific contact metastability mediates critical functions of disordered proteins.
Collapse
|
11
|
Multidomain architecture of estrogen receptor reveals interfacial cross-talk between its DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains. Nat Commun 2018; 9:3520. [PMID: 30166540 PMCID: PMC6117352 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06034-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human estrogen receptor alpha (hERα) is a hormone-responsive nuclear receptor (NR) involved in cell growth and survival that contains both a DNA-binding domain (DBD) and a ligand-binding domain (LBD). Functionally relevant inter-domain interactions between the DBD and LBD have been observed in several other NRs, but for hERα, the detailed structural architecture of the complex is unknown. By utilizing integrated complementary techniques of small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical protein footprinting and computational modeling, here we report an asymmetric L-shaped “boot” structure of the multidomain hERα and identify the specific sites on each domain at the domain interface involved in DBD–LBD interactions. We demonstrate the functional role of the proposed DBD–LBD domain interface through site-specific mutagenesis altering the hERα interfacial structure and allosteric signaling. The L-shaped structure of hERα is a distinctive DBD–LBD organization of NR complexes and more importantly, reveals a signaling mechanism mediated by inter-domain crosstalk that regulates this receptor’s allosteric function. The human estrogen receptor alpha (hERα) is a hormone-responsive transcription factor. Here the authors combine small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical protein footprinting and computational modeling and show that multidomain hERα adopts an L-shaped boot-like architecture revealing a cross-talk between its DNA-binding domain and Ligand-binding domain.
Collapse
|