Neopterin in tuberculous and neoplastic pleural fluids

Elevated neopterin in tuberculosis and co-infection with HIV and the effect of treatment: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Neopterin (NEO) is a marker of immune stimulation. Increased NEO levels have been associated with autoimmune diseases, infections, and malignancies. Studies of NEO alterations in tuberculosis (TB) with or without HIV co-infection show inconsistent results. Moreover, challenges exist regarding TB diagnosis in people with HIV.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing urinary, pleural, and blood NEO levels between patients with TB or HIV-TB co-infection as the case group and subjects without TB and HIV or subjects with HIV without TB as the control group, respectively.

RESULTS

Blood NEO levels in patients with active TB were higher than healthy controls, with a large effect size of 1.99. Patients with TB had higher blood NEO levels before anti-tuberculosis therapy (ATT) than after ATT for months or when treatment ended with moderate effect sizes (1.13-1.46). meta-analysis of studies of patients with HIV-TB co-infection yielded similar results, with higher blood NEO levels in patients than controls that remained significant in subgroups of studies on pulmonary TB (PTB) patients and serum NEO and higher blood NEO levels in patients before than after ATT.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses reveal alteration in NEO levels in different specimens, e.g., blood, urine, and pleural fluid, in patients with TB with or HIV-TB co-infection compared to the control groups. Future studies need to investigate the utility of NEO as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for TB. Also, cellular and molecular mechanisms linking NEO and TB remain to be addressed.

Diagnostic Potential of Circulating Biomarkers in Adenosine Deaminase Diagnosed Pleural Tuberculosis Cases

Pleural tuberculosis accounts for nearly 20% of Extra pulmonary tuberculosis. Adenosine deaminase, commonly used biomarker for the diagnosis, is non specific and there is paucity of literature on its correlation with conventional or newer methods for the diagnosis of extra pulmonary forms of TB. The aim of the study was to assess diagnostic potential of T cell function markers [interferon (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL-2) and IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio]; macrophage activation marker [neopterin]; and oxidative stress markers [protein carbonyl and malondialdehyde (MDA)] in pleural tuberculosis. 26 pleural TB cases diagnosed on the basis of suggestive chest X-ray and raised serum ADA levels and healthy controls were included in the study. Pleural fluid specimens were subjected to Zeihl Neelsen staining and culture on Lowenstein Jensen medium. Serum IFN-γ, IL-2, neopterin and protein carbonyl levels detection were done by ELISA and MDA levels were determined by measuring the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Median serum levels of IFN-γ, IL-2, IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio, neopterin, protein carbonyl and MDA were significantly different between cases and controls. Levels of all biomarkers except IL-2 were significantly higher in cases with contact history. Mean levels of ADA and ESR were 46.27 U/L and 46.62 mm/hr in PTB cases. AUC for IFN-γ, IL-2, IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio, neopterin, protein carbonyl and MDA were significantly discriminative for cases and controls. IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio was best discriminatory biomarker with highest area under ROC curve. Though no correlation was seen between ADA and any of the six biomarkers, ESR levels correlated significantly with all biomarkers except IL-2 by spearman's correlation coefficient. Though all the circulating biomarkers under study provide useful supportive evidence for the diagnosis of PTB, further studies involving diverse control groups particularly non-PTB effusion are needed to validate these results.

Neopterin in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Infectious Diseases

Neopterin is produced by activated monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells upon stimulation by interferon gamma produced by T-lymphocytes. Quantification of neopterin in body fluids has been achieved by standard high-performance liquid chromatography, radioimmunoassays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Neopterin levels predict HIV-related mortality more efficiently than clinical manifestations. Successful highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with a decrease in neopterin levels. Elevated neopterin levels were associated with hepatitis by hepatitis A, B, and C viruses. Serum neopterin levels were found to be a predictor of response to treatment of chronic HCV infection with pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin. Neopterin levels of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were found to be higher in patients with more extensive radiological changes. Elimination of blood donors with elevated neopterin levels to reduce risk of transmission of infections with known and unknown viral pathogens has been undertaken. Neopterin measurement is hereby more cost effective but less sensitive than screening using polymerase chain reaction based assays. In conclusion neopterin is a nonspecific marker of activated T-helper cell 1 dominated immune response. It may be a useful marker for monitoring of infectious disease activity during treatment and for more accurate estimation of extent of disease and prognosis.

Pleural fluid analysis: standstill or a work in progress?

Pleural fluid analysis yields important diagnostic information in pleural effusions in combination with clinical history, examination, and radiology. For more than 30 years, the initial and most pragmatic step in this process is to determine whether the fluid is a transudate or an exudate. Light's criteria remain the most robust in separating the transudate-exudate classification which dictates further investigations or management. Recent studies have led to the evaluation and implementation of a number of additional fluid analyses that may improve the diagnostic utility of this method. This paper discusses the current practice and future direction of pleural fluid analysis in determining the aetiology of a pleural effusion. While this has been performed for a few decades, a number of other pleural characteristics are becoming available suggesting that this diagnostic tool is indeed a work in progress.

Pleural fluid characteristics of tuberculous pleural effusions

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection of the pleural space is an important cause of pleural effusion in areas of high TB prevalence. Microbiological analyses of pleural fluid in the acute setting may be negative. Consequently, investigations may proceed to more invasive techniques, such as pleural biopsy or thoracoscopy. Ongoing research has led to implementing a number of additional fluid analyses that may lead to a diagnosis without a need for further invasive procedures. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of tuberculous pleural fluid that may assist in this important diagnosis, and we highlight the benefits of specific biomarker analyses. English-language publications from a MEDLINE search and references from relevant articles from January 1, 1990 to September 1, 2009 were reviewed. The key words searched included tuberculosis, pleural fluid, effusion, diagnosis, adenosine deaminase, and interferon.

Pleural fluid neopterin levels in tuberculous pleurisy

OBJECTIVES

Neopterin is produced by stimulated macrophages under the influence of gamma interferon of lymphocyte origin. It is regarded as a biochemical marker of cell-mediated immune response. This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value of pleural fluid neopterin levels in tuberculous pleurisy in comparison with adenosine deaminase activity.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity and neopterin levels were measured in 16 patients with tuberculous pleurisy (TP) and 19 patients with malignant pleurisy (MP). ADA activity was determined by a colorimetric method, whereas neopterin levels were determined by a reversed-phase liquid chromatography technique. All values were given as median (min-max).

RESULTS

The mean age was 45.43+/-20.39 years in the TP group and 60.42+/-11.02 years in the MP group (p=0.026). The median pleural fluid ADA activity was 51.75 U/L (3.50-62.40 U/L) in the TP group and was 2.30 U/L (1-8.20 U/L) in the MP group. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The median pleural fluid neopterin levels were 13.15 nmol/L (1.86-59.50 nmol/L) and 2.44 nmol/L (0.92-27.60 nmol/L) in the TP group and the MP group, respectively (p=0.021). In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of pleural fluid neopterin concentrations, receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was performed.

CONCLUSION

Pleural fluid neopterin concentration is significantly higher in TP when compared to MP, however when compared, its clinical use as a diagnostic marker is not valuable as ADA.

BAL neopterin : a novel marker for cell-mediated immunity in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neopterin is derived from guanosine triphosphate and is produced by stimulated macrophages under the influence of gamma-interferon of lymphocyte origin. It has been suggested that it is an excellent marker for the activation of the monocyte/macrophage axis in some clinical situations. However, to our knowledge, the relationship of BAL neopterin levels to disease states has not been studied.

AIM

To assess the usefulness of BAL neopterin levels as an index of disease activity in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and lung cancer.

METHODS

BAL and serum neopterin levels were evaluated in 20 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, 20 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma, and 10 healthy individuals. The concentration of neopterin was evaluated by radioimmunoassay technique. The BAL level of neopterin was standardized using the BAL urea level.

RESULTS

The neopterin levels (mean +/- SD) in the BAL and serum of tuberculous patients (88.6 +/- 27.4 nmol/L epithelial lining fluid [ELF], 61.3 +/- 29.4 nmol/L, respectively) were significantly higher when compared with those in lung cancer patients (40.7 +/- 16.6 nmol/L ELF, 26.8 +/- 6.58 nmol/L, respectively, p < 0.001) and when compared with those in control subjects (26.3 +/- 11.3 nmol/L ELF, 6.8 +/- 2.7 nmol/L, respectively, p < 0.001). In the tuberculous group, BAL and serum neopterin levels in patients with far-advanced disease were significantly higher when compared with those in patients with moderately and minimally advanced diseases (p < 0.001). BAL and serum neopterin levels were significantly higher in patients with small cell carcinoma than in those with adenocarcinoma (p < 0.05). BAL neopterin levels were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than serum levels in all patients and control groups. In addition, there were significant positive correlations between BAL and serum neopterin levels in tuberculous (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), lung cancer (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), and control groups (r = 0.93, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The levels of neopterin in BAL fluid may reflect the degree of disease activity in pulmonary tuberculous patients. In addition, BAL neopterin levels are elevated in patients with lung cancer, especially the small-cell carcinoma type.

Leucocyte activation markers in clinical practice

The response against tissue injury and infection begins with the early activation of molecular and cellular elements of the inflammatory and immune response. Severe tissue injury, necrosis, and infection induce imbalanced inflammation associated with leukocyte over-stimulation and excessive or dysregulated release of cellular mediators. Clinical and experimental studies have shown that these mediators are directly related to progressive post-injury complications. Persistent increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators produce tissue injury. Excessive production and activity of anti-inflammatory mediators cause anergy and/or immune dysfunction with increased susceptibility to infection. Leukocyte activation is assessed by cell surface phenotype expression, cellular mediators determination, or by measuring functional responses using isolated cells. Potential routine clinical uses are: evaluation of severity and prognosis in critically ill patients, immunomonitoring of sepsis, and detection of tissue injury, necrosis, and infection. In practice, the determination of cellular activation markers is restricted by a limited number of automated methods and by the cost of reagents. The availability of flow cytometry and immunoassay automated systems can contribute to a wider use in practice. Here we review the immunopathophysiology of polymorphonuclear neutrophil, monocyte, macrophage, and lymphocyte activation in response to tissue injury and infection. In addition, laboratory methods for their determination, and clinical applications in practice, are discussed.