Cell-type specific response of peripheral blood lymphocytes to methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Impact of methotrexate treatment on vaccines immunogenicity in adult rheumatological patients - Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

Despite the development of new biological and synthetic targeted therapies, methotrexate remains one of the most commonly used immunomodulatory drugs in rheumatology. However, its effect on the immunogenicity of vaccines has been studied only to a limited extent until recently, resulting in the lack of clear guidelines on the use of methotrexate during vaccination. Significant progress was made during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the dynamic development of research on vaccines, including patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. In the following literature review, we present a summary of what we know so far on the impact of methotrexate on post-vaccination response in adult rheumatology patients, taking into account the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies on the effect of methotrexate on the immunogenicity of influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis, hepatitis A, yellow fever, and COVID-19 vaccines are described in detail, including the effect of methotrexate on the humoral and cellular response of individual vaccines. The available evidence for recommendations for withholding methotrexate in the post-vaccination period is presented. Lastly, an overview of potential immunological mechanisms through which MTX modulates the immunogenicity of vaccinations is also provided.

Effects of temporarily suspending low-dose methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster on vaccine response in immunosuppressed adults with inflammatory conditions: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial and nested mechanistic substudy (Vaccine Response On/Off Methotrexate (VROOM) study)

INTRODUCTION

It is unknown if a temporary break in long-term immune-suppressive treatment after vaccination against COVID-19 improves vaccine response. The objective of this study was to evaluate if a 2-week interruption in low-dose weekly methotrexate treatment after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters enhances the immune response compared with continuing treatment in adults with autoimmune inflammatory conditions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An open-label, pragmatic, prospective, parallel group, randomised controlled superiority trial with internal feasibility assessment and nested mechanistic substudy will be conducted in rheumatology and dermatology clinics in approximately 25 UK hospitals. The sample size is 560, randomised 1:1 to intervention and usual care arms. The main outcome measure is anti-spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody level, collected at prebooster (baseline), 4 weeks (primary outcome) and 12 weeks (secondary outcome) post booster vaccination. Other secondary outcome measures are patient global assessments of disease activity, disease flares and their treatment, EuroQol 5- dimention 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), self-reported adherence with advice to interrupt or continue methotrexate, neutralising antibody titre against SARS-CoV-2 (mechanistic substudy) and oral methotrexate biochemical adherence (mechanistic substudy). Analysis of B-cell memory and T-cell responses at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 will be investigated subject to obtaining additional funding. The principal analysis will be performed on the groups as randomised (ie, intention to treat). The difference between the study arms in anti-spike RBD antibody level will be estimated using mixed effects model, allowing for repeated measures clustered within participants. The models will be adjusted for randomisation factors and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection status.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Leeds West Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (REC reference: 21/HRA/3483, IRAS 303827). Participants will be required to give written informed consent before taking part in the trial. Dissemination will be via peer review publications, newsletters and conferences. Results will be communicated to policymakers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11442263.

Methotrexate Ameliorates Systemic Inflammation and Septic Associated-Lung Damage in a Cecal Ligation and Puncture Septic Rat Model

Background: Sepsis is a serious, heterogeneous clinical entity produced by a severe and systemic host inflammatory response to infection. Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate-antagonist that induces the generation of adenosine and also inhibits JAK/STAT pathway; MTX it is widely used as an anti-inflammatory drug to control the immune system. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the beneficial effects of a single and low dose of MTX in the systemic response and acute lung injury (ALI) induced by sepsis. As in the clinics, we treated our animals with antibiotics and fluids and performed the source control to mimic the current clinic treatment. Methods and main results: Sepsis was induced in rats by a cecal ligation puncture (CLP) procedure. Six hours after induction of sepsis, we proceeded to the source control; fluids and antibiotics were administered at 6 h and 24 h after CLP. MTX (2.5 mg/Kg) was administered 6 h after the first surgery in one CLP experimental group and to one Sham group. A protective effect of MTX was observed through a significant reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease infiltration of inflammatory cells in the lung. In addition, we found a regulation in adenosine receptor A2aR and the metalloproteinases by MTX. Conclusion: A single, low dose of MTX attenuates sepsis lung-associated damage by decreasing pro-inflammatory response, infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells and avoiding defective tissue lung remodeling.

Activated, Pro-Inflammatory Th1, Th17, and Memory CD4+ T Cells and B Cells Are Involved in Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Arthritis (DTHA) Inflammation and Paw Swelling in Mice

Delayed-type hypersensitivity arthritis (DTHA) is a recently established experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in mice with pharmacological values. Despite an indispensable role of CD4+ T cells in inducing DTHA, a potential role for CD4+ T cell subsets is lacking. Here we have quantified CD4+ subsets during DTHA development and found that levels of activated, pro-inflammatory Th1, Th17, and memory CD4+ T cells in draining lymph nodes were increased with differential dynamic patterns after DTHA induction. Moreover, according to B-cell depletion experiments, it has been suggested that this cell type is not involved in DTHA. We show that DTHA is associated with increased levels of B cells in draining lymph nodes accompanied by increased levels of circulating IgG. Finally, using the anti-rheumatoid agents, methotrexate (MTX) and the anti-inflammatory drug dexamethasone (DEX), we show that MTX and DEX differentially suppressed DTHA-induced paw swelling and inflammation. The effects of MTX and DEX coincided with differential regulation of levels of Th1, Th17, and memory T cells as well as B cells. Our results implicate Th1, Th17, and memory T cells, together with activated B cells, to be involved and required for DTHA-induced paw swelling and inflammation.

General synovitis score and immunologic synovitis score reflect clinical disease activity in patients with advanced stage rheumatoid arthritis

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between clinical disease activity in patients with advanced stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on treatment with Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and histopathological scores of synovial inflammation. To this end, synovial biopsies of 62 RA patients who underwent surgery for either synovectomy or total joint arthroplasty were assessed by a general synovitis score (GSS) and an immunologic synovitis score (IMSYC). The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) was significantly correlated with both the GSS and the IMSYC (r = 0.65, p = <0.001, r = 0.68, p = <0.001). Compared to patients with moderate and high disease activity, there was a significantly lower expression of T cell (CD3), B cell (CD20) and neutrophil (CD15) markers in synovial tissue of patients with low activity, but similar expression of the macrophage marker CD68. Subgroup analyses revealed no differences between small and large joints, seropositive and seronegative RA and patients with or without prednisolone treatment. However, we found a significantly stronger correlation of CDAI with IMSYC in patients undergoing arthroplasty (r = 0.82) than in patients undergoing synovectomy (r = 0.55). In addition, there was a stronger correlation of CDAI with GSS in patients treated with methotrexate (r = 0.86) than in patients with TNFα blockade (r = 0.55). In summary, the present study demonstrates that the histopathological scores GSS and IMSYC in general reflect clinical disease activity in patients with advanced stage rheumatoid arthritis, but that there is some heterogeneity between subgroups of patients within the cohort. In the future, molecular characterization of synovial inflammatory cell populations, including plasma cell infiltrates, will help to further defined clinically important subtypes of RA and treatment response.

IgG Anti-ghrelin Immune Complexes Are Increased in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Under Biologic Therapy and Are Related to Clinical and Metabolic Markers

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and metabolic alterations. The mechanisms underlying these alterations remain unclear. Ghrelin is a gastrointestinal hormone with potent effects on food intake, body weight, metabolism, and immune response. Recent studies reported the presence of anti-ghrelin autoantibodies in healthy subjects and the levels and affinity of these autoantibodies were altered in anorectic and obese individuals. In this cross-sectional study we analyzed anti-ghrelin autoantibodies in RA patients and evaluated its relationship with clinical, body-composition and metabolic parameters. Clinical measurements of RA patients included the disease activity score-28 (DAS-28), inflammatory biomarkers, autoantibodies (RF and anti-CCP), body composition, glucose and lipid profile. Serum ghrelin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Free and total anti-ghrelin autoantibodies quantification (IgG and IgA isotypes) was performed by in-house ELISA. RA patients had lower IgG anti-ghrelin autoantibodies levels and higher immune complexes percentage (IgG+ghrelin) compared to the control group, while the IgA anti-ghrelin autoantibodies showed no significant differences. In the bivariate analysis, the percentage of IgG anti-ghrelin immune complexes positively correlated with BMI and ghrelin whereas in the multivariate regression model, the variables associated were DAS-28, body weight, visceral fat, LDL-C and TG (R ² = 0.72). The percentage of IgA anti-ghrelin immune complexes positively correlated with RF and anti-CCP and the multivariate regression model showed an association with RF and body fat percentage (R ² = 0.22). Our study shows an increased percentage of IgG anti-ghrelin immune complexes in RA patients despite ghrelin levels were similar in both groups, suggesting an increase in the affinity of these autoantibodies toward ghrelin. The associations found in the multiple regression analysis for anti-ghrelin immune complexes support the previously reported functions of these natural autoantibodies as carriers and modulators of the stability and physiological effect of the hormone. However, in RA both the disease activity and the RF appear to influence the formation of these anti-ghrelin immune complexes.

Low-dose methotrexate may preserve a stronger antileukemic effect than that of cyclosporine after modified donor lymphocyte infusion in unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT

To compare the impacts of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) with cyclosporine (CSA) on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect after haploidentical modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Fifty-five consecutive patients who had relapsed acute leukemia after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and received modified DLI were retrospectively studied. Forty-one patients received CSA and 14 received low-dose MTX after DLI to prevent DLI-associated GVHD. The incidence of acute GVHD and grade 2-4 acute GVHD in MTX group showed a trend toward being higher than in CSA group (61.0% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.198 and 61.0% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.155). However, no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD between two groups (p = 0.982) was observed. Moreover, compared with CSA, patients treated with MTX had lower re-relapse rate (38.1% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.029), better disease-free survival (DFS) (51.9% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.06), and higher absolute lymphocyte counts at 30, 45, 60, and 90 d after modified DLI (p < 0.05). This study suggested that after haploidentical modified DLI, low-dose MTX is at least as effective as CSA in the prevention of DLI-associated GVHD and probably allowed stronger GVL effect than CSA. This phenomenon was probably due to a direct antitumor effect and a better reconstitution of lymphocytes after modified DLI induced by low-dose MTX.

Distinct effects of methotrexate and etanercept on the B cell compartment in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective

B cells have been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Current treatments include the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs methotrexate (MTX) and tumor necrosis factor α inhibition with etanercept. This study was undertaken to determine how these drugs influence the B cell compartment in patients with JIA.

Methods

B cell subpopulations and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells in the peripheral blood of JIA patients were investigated by multicolor flow cytometry. Serum immunoglobulin and BAFF levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

There was a significant decrease in transitional B cells and significantly lower serum immunoglobulin levels in patients receiving MTX than in untreated patients and those receiving etanercept. In contrast, etanercept treatment had no effect on most of the B cell subpopulations, but resulted in significantly lower BAFF levels and increased numbers of Tfh cells. Thus, our findings indicate an unexpected and previously unknown direct effect of low-dose MTX on B cells, whereas etanercept had a more indirect influence.

Conclusion

Our results contribute to a better understanding of the potency of MTX in autoantibody-mediated autoimmune disease and present a possible mechanism of prevention of the development of drug-induced antibodies to biologic agents. The finding that MTX and etanercept affect the B cell compartment differently supports the notion that combination therapy with etanercept and MTX is more effective than monotherapy.

The Immunosuppressive Effect of Methotrexate in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients vs. its Stimulatory Effect in Nonactive Patients, as Indicated by Cytometric Measurements of CD4 + T Cell Subpopulations

This cytometric study assesses the effects of methotrexate (MTX) on the expanded CD4+ lymphocyte population in active and nonactive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. In the active patients, MTX was found to reduce the predominant CD4+ CD28+ subpopulation (by 30%), and the minor subpopulation of CD4+ CD28- (by 34%). The incidence of CD25 phenotype was downregulated by 15%. These reductions can be attributed to immunosuppression through apoptosis, which was demonstrated by MTX-induced fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hyperpolarization (an established indicator of early apoptosis). In contrast, in nonactive RA patients, the major CD4+ CD28+ subpopulation of small lymphocytes appeared to be activated by MTX, subsequently transforming into a major hyperblast population, whereas the minor CD4+ CD28- subpopulation was not affected by MTX treatment. The activation by MTX in this group of patients is evidenced by MTX-induced FDA depolarization (an indicator of early activation). Thus, MTX immunosuppressive effect on CD4+ subsets was found in active patients, whereas immunostimulation by MTX was shown in nonactive patients. The found discriminative effect of MTX may suggest a higher effectiveness of low-dose MTX therapy in active RA patients.

Revisiting the immunomodulators tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil: their mechanisms of action and role in the treatment of IBD

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are thought to result from unopposed immune responses to normal gut flora in a genetically susceptible host. A variety of immunomodulating therapies are applied for the treatment of patients with IBDs. The first-line treatment for IBDs consists of 5-aminosalicylate and/or budesonide. However, these first-line therapies are often not suitable for continuous treatment or do not suffice for the treatment of severe IBD. Recently, efforts have been made to generate novel selective drugs that are more effective and have fewer side effects. Despite promising results, most of these novel drugs are still in a developmental stage and unavailable for clinical application. Yet, another class of established immunomodulators exists that is successful in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. While waiting for emerging novel therapies, the use of these more established drugs should be considered. Furthermore, one of the advantages of using established immunomodulators is the well-documented knowledge on the long-term side effects and on the mechanisms of action. In this review, the authors discuss 3 well-known immunomodulators that are being applied with increased frequency for the treatment of IBD: tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. These agents have been used for many years as treatment modalities for immunosuppression after organ transplantation, for the treatment of cancer, and for immunomodulation in several other immune-mediated diseases. First, this review discusses the potential targets for immunomodulating therapies in IBDs. Second, the immunomodulating mechanisms and effects of the 3 immunomodulators are discussed in relationship to these treatment targets.

Molecular action of methotrexate in inflammatory diseases

Despite the recent introduction of biological response modifiers and potent new small-molecule antirheumatic drugs, the efficacy of methotrexate is nearly unsurpassed in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Although methotrexate was first introduced as an antiproliferative agent that inhibits the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines for the therapy of malignancies, it is now clear that many of the anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate are mediated by adenosine. This nucleoside, acting at one or more of its receptors, is a potent endogenous anti-inflammatory mediator. In confirmation of this mechanism of action, recent studies in both animals and patients suggest that adenosine-receptor antagonists, among which is caffeine, reverse or prevent the anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate.

Physical and biological dosimetry in patients undergoing radiosynoviorthesis with erbium-169 and rhenium-186

Physical and biological dosimetry were investigated in 45 rheumatoid arthritis patients treated by radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) with 186Re-sulphide (medium-sized joints) and 169Er-citrate (digital joints). Biological dosimetry involved scoring dicentrics in lymphocytes, cultured from blood samples withdrawn just before and 6 h, 24 h and 7 days after treatment. Physical methods included repeated blood sample counts and scintigraphy data. For erbium-169 (pure beta emitter), only bremsstrahlung could be measured and solely in the injection area. For rhenium-186 (both beta and gamma emitter), whole body scans and static images of joints and locoregional lymph nodes were performed. Dosimetry calculations were in accordance with the MIRDOSE 3 software and tables. For erbium-169 (21 patients), either metacarpophalangeal (30 MBq) or proximal interphalangeal (20 MBq) joints of the hands were treated (one joint per patient); 18 patients (out of 21) were interpretable for biological dosimetry, 10 (out of 11) for physical dosimetry and six (out of 10) for both. For rhenium-186, 23 wrists, nine elbows, three shoulders and two ankles were injected in 24 patients, with a maximum of three joints per patient (70 MBq per joint); 20 patients (out of 24) and 10 (out of 10) were interpretable for biological and physical dosimetry, respectively, and eight (out of 10) for both methods. Erbium-169 biological dosimetry was negative in all interpretable patients, and physical dosimetry gave a blood dose of 15 +/- 29 microGy and an effective dose lower than 1 mSv/30 MBq. For rhenium-186, biological results were negative in 16 patients (out of 20), but showed a blood irradiation around 200 mGy in the last four. A significant cumulative increase of dicentrics 7 days after injection (16/10,000 instead of 5/10,000 prior to treatment; p < 0.04) was also noted. Gamma counts gave a blood dose of 23.9 +/- 19.8 mGy/70 MBq and the effective dose was found to be 26.7 +/- 5.1 mGy/70 MBq, i.e. about 380 microGy.MBq-1. Erbium-169 RSO is very safe from both physical and biological dosimetry standpoints. Rhenium-186 leak is greater, as demonstrated by the higher blood activity and the measurable, although limited, dicentrics induction in blood lymphocytes. However, the effective dose remains moderate, i.e. 30 times lower than in 131I therapy in benign thyroid diseases.

Molecular and cellular effects of methotrexate

In 1998, knowledge about the mechanisms of action of methotrexate (MTX) in immunoinflammatory disorders further increased. The most interesting results to date came from studies showing that most of the anti-inflammatory actions of MTX are mediated by adenosine, which may account for the profound effects of MTX on cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, and cell differentiation. Finally, potential novel pharmacologic strategies are discussed based on actual knowledge about the molecular and cellular actions of MTX.

The mechanism of action of methotrexate

Because of methotrexate's well-documented efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, it is important that we understand the mechanism of action of this drug. There are two biochemical mechanisms by which methotrexate may modulate inflammation: (1) promotion of adenosine release and (2) inhibition of transmethylation reactions. Evidence is reviewed that favors the notion that the endogenous anti-inflammatory autocoid adenosine mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of methotrexate. This insight should aid in the design of new agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory diseases.