Fraction of theophylline in sustained-release formulation which is absorbed from the large bowel

Gastrointestinal Transit Monitoring and Absorption of Controlled-Release Pellets of Diltiazem

The gastrointestinal (GI) transit and absorption of a multiparticulate controlled-release diltiazem formulation were investigated with reference to an innovator preparation. Transit of controlled-release pellets in GI tract was monitored using two marker drugs, namely paracetamol and sulfasalazine. Both formulations had little intersubject variation in gastric emptying and small intestine transit time. In both formulations, about 51% to 64% of the drug was absorbed while pellets were in the small intestine and the remaining amount while in the colon. The results found in this study were comparable to the other workers who used gamma scintigraphy or indirect method. Therefore, the method used in this study is a reliable alternative for studying GI transit of pellets.

Kinetics of absorption of a new once-a-day formulation of theophylline in the presence and absence of food

Two three-way crossover studies were done to characterize the drug release characteristics of Monospan (3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN) capsules, a new once-a-day theophylline formulation. In the first study, 22 healthy males received single 450-mg doses of Monospan in the presence and absence of a high-fat breakfast; the same dose of Somophyllin (Fisons, Rochester, NY) immediate-release liquid was given to fasted subjects as a reference. The second study involved 29 healthy males given a single dose of 900 mg of Monospan in the presence and absence of the same high-fat meal; Theo-24 (G. D. Searle and Co., Skokie, IL) capsules were given to fasted subjects as a reference. The results of both studies showed that food did not affect the absorption of theophylline from Monospan; peak concentration, to and area under the serum concentration-time curve were all unchanged. The absorption rates were similar with both strengths and dietary conditions and showed that theophylline was absorbed slowly from Monospan at a constant rate (approximately 3.2%/h) over 24 h. Absorption continued past 24 h, and the extent of absorption from Monospan compared with that from each reference averaged 88% or higher. A good correlation (r > 0.980) was observed for Monospan between the amount absorbed in vivo and the amount released in the in vitro dissolution test, a result that demonstrates the precise rate control of Monospan. We conclude that Monospan is a suitable once-a-day formulation that can be taken without regard to food.

Lack of effect of magnesium-aluminium hydroxide on the absorption of theophylline given as a pH-dependent sustained release preparation

Antacids can modify the pharmacokinetic parameters of sustained-release preparations of theophylline by changing the gastric pH. Though this has been studied with various theophylline/antacid combinations, the specific preparations investigated here have not previously been tested. The objective of the study was to assess any change in the availability of theophylline from a sustained-release preparation (SR), induced by the coadministration with an antacid. The study was designed as a double-blind randomized crossover trial in the Pneumology Departments of three general hospitals. Fifteen patients were studied. They all had stable asthma treated with theophylline and no major organ failure or gastro-intestinal lesions requiring the use of antacids. The antacid (aluminium hydroxide 800 mg and magnesium hydroxide 800 mg), or placebo, tid, was added to a stable regimen of theophylline SR bid, for 4 days, in crossover fashion. Plasma theophylline concentrations were measured before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 h after the morning dose of Armophylline on the fourth day of each treatment period; the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to Cmax (tmax) were noted, and the area under the 24-h time-concentration curve (AUC0-24) and mean plasma concentration (Cmean) were computed. Peak expiratory flows on the same day, before and 3, 6 and 12 h after the morning dose of Armophylline were also measured. There was no change in any of the parameters studied. The addition of the antacid to theophylline, each given according to standard clinical practice, did not modify the pharmacokinetics of the latter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of omeprazole-induced hypochlorhydria on absorption of theophylline from a sustained-release formulation

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of raised intragastric pH on the absorption of theophylline from a sustained-release formulation. Six healthy male volunteers participated in the cross-over randomised study and on one of two occasions were pretreated with 240 mg omeprazole, administered in three divided doses over the 22 h preceding the test. The sulphasalazine/sulphapyridine method of assessing oral-caecal transit time was implemented in order to assess upper bowel and colonic absorption. The mean fraction absorbed-time profile was calculated from serial serum theophylline concentration measurements by a modification of the Wagner-Nelson equation. During hypochlorhydria the mean oral-caecal transit time was 4.6 h, mean time to 90% absorption 6.8 h, and the percentage theophylline presumably to be absorbed from the colon 32.3. The corresponding values with normochlorhydria were, respectively, 3.8 h, 8.5 h, and 57.5%. The shorter oral-caecal transit time and lesser upper bowel absorption during normochlorhydria is postulated to result from motilin release due to duodenal acidification. Gastric hypoacidity resulted in significantly increased cumulative fractions of theophylline absorbed during a 3.5 h period, starting 0.5 h after breakfast. Possibly hypochlorhydria amplifies the increased motility which follows the intake of a meal, resulting in increased peristalsis and antiperistalsis, with more rapid drug absorption.

The influence of codeine, propantheline and metoclopramide on small bowel transit and theophylline absorption from a sustained-release formulation

1. The effects of the anticholinergic agent, propantheline, the opiate, codeine, and the prokinetic agent, metoclopramide, on oral-caecal transit time and on the absorption of theophylline from a sustained-release formulation were examined in six healthy male volunteers. 2. A cross-over randomised sequence design was followed, allowing at least 2 weeks interval between studies. On each occasion 500 mg theophylline in a sustained-release formulation was taken simultaneously with 2 g sulphasalazine at zero time. On three of the four occasions one of the following treatments was given concurrently at -0.5 h, +3.5 h, and +7.5 h: 30 mg codeine phosphate, 30 mg propantheline bromide, or 10 mg metoclopramide monohydrochloride. 3. The appearance of sulphapyridine in the plasma was used to assess oral-caecal transit time and the mean fraction absorbed-time profile of theophylline was calculated from serial serum theophylline concentration measurements using the Wagner-Nelson method. 4. Codeine increased the mean (s.d.) oral-caecal time (h) significantly (5.14 +/- 0.94) compared with the control value (3.78 +/- 0.34). Propantheline inhibited peristaltic contractions to such an extent that the oral-caecal transit time in five of the volunteers was between 9 and 25 h, while sulphapyridine appeared in the 9 h serum sample of the sixth. Metoclopramide did not significantly alter the oral-caecal transit time. 5. Despite the observed changes in oral-caecal transit time the rate and extent of theophylline absorption was similar with all regimens.