Combined application of methods to taxonomic identification of Saccharomyces strains in fermenting botrytized grape must.
J Appl Microbiol 2005;
98:971-9. [PMID:
15752344 DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02543.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS
Although numerous physiological and molecular methods have been proposed for yeast taxonomy, the unambiguous separation of Saccharomyces sensu stricto species in natural samples is still an incompletely resolved issue. In this study the power of various methods was compared in the identification of strains isolated from fermenting botrytized grape musts.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Conventional taxonomic and physiological tests and molecular methods developed for rapid identification were used.
CONCLUSIONS
None of the methods tested was sufficiently powerful. However, the combination of electrophoretic karyotyping and the PCR-RFLP of MET2 with growth tests at 10 and 37 degrees C provided results sufficient for species identification of Saccharomyces wine strains which were not interspecific hybrids or recombinants.
SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY
The proposed combination of molecular and physiological methods allows specific taxonomic identification and separation of Saccharomyces wine strains without extensive genetic and molecular analysis. The proposed combined approach can also identify hybrids and recombinants.
Collapse