Roles of intoxicated practice in the development of ethanol tolerance

Sex and age differences in heavy binge drinking and its effects on alcohol responsivity following abstinence

Binge drinking during adolescence may perturb the maturing neuroenvironment and increase susceptibility of developing an alcohol use disorder later in life. In the present series of experiments, we utilized a modified version of the drinking in the dark-multiple scheduled access (DID-MSA) procedure to study how heavy binge drinking during adolescence alters responsivity to ethanol later in adulthood. Adult and adolescent C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) males and females were given access to a 20% ethanol solution for 3 hourly periods, each separated by 2h of free water access. B6 adults and adolescents consumed 2 to 3.5 g/kg ethanol an hour and displayed significant intoxication and binge-like blood ethanol concentrations. There was an interaction of sex and age, however, driven by high intakes in adult B6 females, who peaked at 11.01 g/kg. Adolescents of both sexes and adult males never consumed more than 9.3 g/kg. D2 mice consumed negligible amounts of alcohol and showed no evidence of intoxication. B6 mice were abstinent for one month and were retested on the balance beam 10 min following 1.75 g/kg ethanol challenge (20%v/v; i.p). They were also tested for changes in home cage locomotion immediately following the 1.75 g/kg dose (for 10 min prior to balance beam). Although there was no effect of age of exposure, all mice with a binge drinking history demonstrated a significantly dampened ataxic response to an ethanol challenge. Female mice that binge drank during adulthood showed a significantly augmented locomotor response to ethanol when compared to their water drinking controls. This alteration was not noted for males or for females that binge drank during adolescence. These results highlight the importance of biological sex, and its interaction with age, in the development of behavioral adaptation following binge drinking.

Tolerance to ethanol's ataxic effects and alterations in ethanol-induced locomotion following repeated binge-like ethanol intake using the DID model

BACKGROUND

Tolerance to the behavioral and subjective effects of alcohol (ethanol) is thought to be a major predictive factor for the development of alcoholism. Evidence from rodent models has supported this view with those animals most likely to develop tolerance generally drinking and preferring ethanol more so than those resistant to it. Despite this evidence, very little is known about the behavioral relationships between ethanol-induced tolerance and consumption. The goal of this study was to evaluate the development of tolerance to the ataxic effects of ethanol using a mouse model of binge-like intake dubbed "Drinking in the Dark" (DID; Physiol Behav 2005, 84:53-63). We hypothesized that mice would become tolerant to the ataxic effects of ethanol as this behavior is known to be altered at the blood ethanol concentrations reached using this model (≥80 mg/dl).

METHODS

To evaluate this, we gave daily DID ethanol or water access sessions to male C57BL/6J (B6) mice and monitored ataxia (and in some cases locomotion) at various time points.

RESULTS

In general, mice given 14 consecutive days of ethanol access displayed tolerance to the ataxic effects of ethanol compared to water-drinking controls. These effects were coupled with alterations in locomotor behavior and in some cases differences in ethanol pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, we can conclude that tolerance to the behavioral effects of binge-like ethanol intake might play a key role in the daily maintenance of this behavior and that these effects may be evidence of important neuroadaptations involved in the development of alcoholism.

Ontogeny of ethanol-induced motor impairment following acute ethanol: assessment via the negative geotaxis reflex in adolescent and adult rats

Adolescent rats have been observed to be less sensitive than adults to a number of ethanol effects that may serve as feedback cues to reduce further ethanol intake. Among these findings are a few reports of attenuated sensitivities of adolescents to ethanol-induced motor impairment. The purpose of the present study was to further explore potential age-related differences in ethanol-induced motor impairment in both male and female adolescent (postnatal day [P]28-32), and adult (P68-72) Sprague-Dawley rats using an inclined plane assessment of the negative geotaxis reflex. Adult males displayed significant motor impairment at 1.5 g/kg, whereas adolescent males required higher doses, showing significant motor impairment only at doses of 2.25 g/kg ethanol or greater. Intoxicated practice did not significantly influence level of motor impairment at either age. When female rats of both ages were separately analyzed in terms of their response to ethanol, a dose of 1.5 g/kg ethanol was found to significantly impair adults, whereas adolescent females showed significant motor impairment when challenged with 2.25 g/kg but not 1.5 g/kg ethanol. Yet when the 1.5 g/kg data of females at the two ages were directly compared, no significant age difference was seen at this dose. These data document an attenuated sensitivity of adolescent relative to adult rats to the motor impairing effects of ethanol using a stationary inclined plane test, an effect particularly robust in male animals, and demonstrates the utility of this test for assessment of motor coordination in adolescent and adult rats.

Current state of knowledge about the mechanisms of alcohol tolerance

Far from being a simple homeostatic response to the presence of ethanol in the brain, tolerance is now recognized as a complex process which can develop within various time frames (acute, rapid, chronic) and in which the drug interacts with various environmental and cognitive factors, including associative and operant learning. A major question is whether the acute form is an innate adaptive response, which is converted into the rapid and chronic forms by the action of these external influences. So far, all behavioral and neuropharmacological manipulations that alter chronic tolerance also modify rapid and acute tolerance in similar ways. These include lesions of serotonergic forebrain projections, blockade of NMDA-type glutamate receptors and calcium "L" channels, central or peripheral injection of vasopressin and blockade of vasopressin V1 receptors. Cytochemical and immunofluorescence studies, combined with use of retrograde tracers, indicate the existence of a septohippocampal circuit which may mediate the interactions of these diverse elements in the production and maintenance of tolerance. There is limited evidence that development of tolerance leads to increased consumption of ethanol in experimental animals, but the clinical significance of these findings remains to be proven.

Characterizing tolerance to trichloroethylene (TCE): effects of repeated inhalation of TCE on performance of a signal detection task in rats

Previous work showed that rats develop tolerance to the acute behavioral effects of trichloroethylene (TCE) on signal detection if they inhale TCE while performing the task and that this tolerance depends more upon learning than upon changes in metabolism of TCE. The present study sought to characterize this tolerance by assessing signal detection in rats during three phases of TCE exposures. Tolerance was induced in Phase 1 (daily 1-h test sessions concurrent with TCE exposure), extinguished in Phase 2 (daily tests in air with intermittent probe tests in TCE), and reinduced in Phase 3. Original induction in Phase 1 required 2 weeks, whereas reinduction in Phase 3 required less than 1 week. Tolerance persisted for 2 (accuracy) or 8 weeks [response time] in Phase 2 and was resistant to changes in test conditions in Phase 3. The slow induction, gradual extinction, savings during reinduction and lack of disruption from altered test conditions suggest mediation by instrumental learning processes. These data and most other evidence for behavioral tolerance to solvents can be explained by solvent-induced loss of reinforcement.

Sensitivity and tolerance to the motor impairing effects of moderate doses of ethanol

The present study assessed sensitivity and the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of moderate doses of ethanol, using an oscillating bar task. Adult male Wistar rats were trained for 5 consecutive days to stay on the oscillating bar for 120 s to avoid a 0.5-mA foot shock. On the 5 consecutive test days, animals were injected once a day with ethanol (ip: 1.0, 1.25, or 1.5 g/kg) and tested at 15 min intervals until recovery to the 120 s criterion. On test day 1, rats in the 1.5 g/kg group took significantly longer to recover (81+/-9 min; mean+/-S.E.M.) than did animals in the 1.25 (49+/-9 min) and 1.0 (29+/-5 min) g/kg groups. Tolerance developed to all doses by test day 3, with the 1.5, 1.25, and 1.0 g/kg groups reaching criterion in significantly shorter times (42+/-8, 31+/-5, and 18+/-2 min, respectively), as compared to test day 1. BACs associated with recovery time on test day 3, for the 1.5 g/kg group, were significantly higher than the BACs associated with recovery time on test day 1. The data suggest that the oscillating bar task can be used to measure the acute ataxic effects of ethanol, across a narrow range of moderate ethanol doses, and, as well, the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of these ethanol doses.

Learning and tolerance to the ataxic effect of ethanol

It has been well documented that drug-associated cues are important for the development and expression of drug tolerance. The Pavlovian conditioning analysis of tolerance emphasizes the importance of a drug-associated cues to tolerance by equating a drug administration with a learning trial. According to this analysis, tolerance should be subject to external inhibition, the disruption of a conditional response by a novel stimulus. We previously reported that tolerance to the ataxic effect of ethanol was attenuated by a novel strobe/noise presentation (31). In this article we report evidence of a compensatory CR in rats tolerant to the ataxic effect of ethanol as tested on the tilting plane. Both the compensatory CR and tolerance were disrupted by the presentation of a novel strobe/noise stimulus providing converging evidence that the attenuation of tolerance by a novel stimulus results from external inhibition of Pavlovian conditioning. The disruption of ethanol tolerance and the conditional response mediating tolerance was also apparent when the novel omission of the strobe/noise stimulus was used as the external inhibitor in rats made tolerant to ethanol with the stimulus on. Finally, we have shown that the disruptive effect of a novel stimulus on ethanol tolerance is decreased when there is a 10-day delay between the final tolerance development session and testing, demonstrating that the interval between training and testing is important when assessing associative tolerance.

Cross-tolerance between ethanol and neurotensin in mice selectively bred for ethanol sensitivity

Neurotensin (NT), a tridecapeptide that satisfies criteria as a neurotransmitter, mimics many actions of ethanol, and evidence indicates that some of the acute effects of ethanol are mediated in part by NT. Recent studies have shown that chronic ethanol treatment produced a downregulation of NT receptors in mesolimbic brain regions of long sleep (LS) mice and that reduced NT binding capacity was associated with acquisition and decay of tolerance to ethanol-induced locomotor inhibition and hypothermia in these mice. The present study was undertaken to determine whether cross-tolerance develops between NT and ethanol and whether chronic NT infusion produces NT receptor downregulation. Animals chronically treated with ethanol were tolerant to NT-mediated locomotor inhibition at a dose of 1.8 pmol NT, ICV, and were tolerant to NT-induced hypothermia at 1.8 and 6.0 pmol NT. Following repeated injections or continuous infusion of NT ICV, LS mice showed tolerance to both NT- and ethanol-induced hypothermia and locomotor inhibition. Indeed, ethanol doses that are hypnotic in control mice (2.8 g/kg) were not effective in abolishing locomotor activity following chronic NT administration. Results with chronic saline infusion ICV indicate that stress alters sensitivity to ethanol-induced hypothermia. Chronic infusion of NT ICV produced a region-specific downregulation of high-affinity NT receptors in the striatum. The results demonstrate that cross-tolerance develops between NT and ethanol, and further support a role for neurotensinergic systems in the actions of ethanol.

A simple technique for quantifying intoxication-induced by low doses of ethanol

A simple technique for the measurement of intoxication induced by low doses of alcohol in the rat was developed. Rats are required to maintained their balance on a rectangular wooden bar that oscillates in a 120 degree angle in an arch-like fashion. A steady baseline can be obtained for each animal with approximately 10 min of training time. Ethanol, in a dose range from 0.5-1.5 g/kg, given orally or by IP route, impairs animal's performance in a dose-related manner. At the same blood ethanol concentration, a higher degree of impairment is observed at higher oscillating frequency. Significant impairment of performance can be detected at ethanol dose of 0.5 g/kg given IP or orally. Pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide, in doses of comparable potencies to those of ethanol doses also produce a dose-related impairment of performance. The oscillating bar test is a simple but sensitive test that can qualitatively assess intoxication induced by low doses of ethanol or other sedative hypnotic drugs.

Blockade of chronic tolerance to ethanol by the NMDA antagonist, (+)-MK-801

Previous studies indicated that learning and memory play important roles in the development of tolerance to ethanol. (+)-MK-801 has been shown to impair learning and might thus also block the development of tolerance to ethanol. To test this possibility, rats were trained to criterion on the moving belt, a complex motor coordination test. Acute i.p. injection of (+)-MK-801 (a non-competitive NMDA channel blocker) produced dose-related impairment on this test. A dose of 0.1 mg/kg, that had negligible effect by itself, potentiated the acute effects of ethanol. In a chronic experiment with different animals, half of the rats received (+)-MK-801 or saline daily, followed 30 min later by ethanol (1.8 g/kg i.p.) and three practice runs on the belt, and 1 h later a second dose of (+)-MK-801 or saline. The other half received the same drugs but ethanol followed the practice. (+)-MK-801 blocked the functional tolerance to ethanol in both groups when the pre-ethanol dose was 0.25 mg/kg, but not when it was 0.1 mg/kg. Tolerance to the effects of (+)-MK-801 itself did not occur over 2 weeks of treatment. These results suggest that NMDA receptors are involved in development of chronic tolerance to ethanol as shown previously with rapid tolerance.

Arginine-8-vasopressin potentiates acute ethanol intoxication

AVP maintains ethanol (EtOH) tolerance after cessation of chronic EtOH treatment. However, the acute interaction of AVP and EtOH has not been well characterized. Rats were trained on a moving belt and the EtOH dose-response relationship (range 1.0-2.0 g/kg) was determined after pretreatment with saline, AVP (2.5-40 micrograms SC or 10 ng ICV), the AVP-V1 receptor antagonist [Des-Gly9,d(CH2)5(1),O-Et-Tyr2, Val4,Arg8]-vasopressin (10 ng ICV), or AVP in combination with the V1 antagonist. AVP produced a 16% decrease in the EtOH ED50 when given either SC or ICV; this decrease, which appears to represent true potentiation rather than additivity, was prevented by the preadministration of the V1 antagonist. Other rats were made EtOH-tolerant by 7 daily injections of either EtOH alone (1.8 g/kg IP) or EtOH (1.5 g/kg IP) + AVP (10 micrograms SC), followed by a practice session on the moving belt. In both sets of tolerant animals, AVP potentiation of acute EtOH effects was still seen on day 6. The mechanism of AVP potentiation of EtOH-induced impairment is unknown, but the failure of the V1 antagonist alone to alter the effect of EtOH suggests that endogenous AVP is not involved directly in modulating EtOH intoxication.

Chronic ethanol consumption produces genotype-dependent tolerance to ethanol in LS/Ibg and SS/Ibg mice

It is well known that chronic ethanol administration produces tolerance to the sedative-hypnotic and hypothermic effects as well as low-dose locomotor inhibitory effects of ethanol. We report herein characterization of a convenient method of producing genotype-dependent functional tolerance to ethanol-induced locomotor inhibition. Mice, LS/Ibg (LS) and SS/Ibg (SS), which differ markedly in acute effects of ethanol on locomotor activity, hypothermia, and hypnotic sensitivity, were required to consume solutions of ethanol in water as the sole source of liquid. Mice were provided lab chow ad lib. and the following regimen of ethanol in water, v/v: 10% for 4 days, 15% for 4 days, 20% for 7 days, followed by 15% for periods longer than 2 weeks. Control animals received water only or were pair-fed sucrose (isocaloric with ethanol) solutions plus lab chow; both control and ethanol-consuming (15 g ethanol/kg/24 h) mice maintained similar body weights for up to 4 weeks. Blood ethanol concentrations from 10-200 mg% were obtained during a 12 L:12 D cycle. At 6 h following withdrawal, LS and SS mice showed differential dose-dependent tolerance to locomotor inhibitory effects of ethanol. However, low-dose locomotor activation was unaltered in either line of mice, and results indicate that an apparent sensitization in SS mice is secondary to development of tolerance to locomotor inhibition. Maximum tolerance to locomotor inhibition was observed after 2 weeks of chronic ethanol consumption, with responses returning to control values within 1-2 weeks after withdrawal. Rates of acquisition of tolerance were similar in LS and SS mice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of intoxicated practice on the development of acute tolerance to the motor impairment effect of ethanol

The influence of practice while under intoxication was tested on the development of acute tolerance to the motor impairment effect of ethanol. In experiment 1, the motor impairment effect induced by an IP injection of 1.8 g/kg ethanol was quantified after various intervals in separate groups of animals. Lower impairment scores were observed in rats tested at 30 and 45 min after ethanol administration than in those tested at 15 min. In group that was tested repeatedly after ethanol administration, intoxication decreased more rapidly and to a greater extent. The same phenomenon was observed in experiment 2 when a higher dose of ethanol (2.2 g/kg) and later testing (60-180 min after ethanol administration) were employed. To maintain constant blood ethanol levels, those tested at later times received a supplementary dose of ethanol. Impairment scores were lower in rats tested at later times than in those tested earlier. Again, the impairment scores for the practice group decreased more rapidly and to a greater extent. Blood ethanol levels among various groups were essentially the same. Acute tolerance to ethanol can develop without opportunity for practice while under intoxication. Intoxicated practice, however, can facilitate acute tolerance development.

Tolerance to ethanol's effects on operant performance in rats: role of number and pattern of intoxicated practice opportunities

Acquisition and retention of tolerance to ethanol's rate-decreasing effects on operant performance were examined in rats which received a 52-day regimen of ethanol or saline injections prior to and/or after each daily session. Eight groups of rats differed on: (a) number of days with intoxicated practice (pre-session ethanol); (b) intermittent (spaced) or daily (massed) intoxicated practice; and (c) post-session ethanol or saline on non-intoxicated practice days. Massed practice groups were given their presession saline days prior to their pre-session ethanol days. Ethanol dose-effect tests were given prior to, during, and after the chronic injection regimen. Under both spaced and massed practice conditions, the magnitude of tolerance developed increased directly with the number of pre-session ethanol days, even when absolute ethanol exposure was constant. No group showed complete tolerance loss. The post-session ethanol supplements (a) facilitated tolerance development in spaced practice groups and tolerance loss in massed practice groups, (b) blocked ethanol's low dose rate-increasing effects, and (c) produced an acute withdrawal-like performance disruption the next day. The results suggest that both intoxicated practice and practice during acute ethanol withdrawal influence the acquisition and retention of compensatory behaviors during ethanol tolerance development.

Tolerance to the effects of ethanol on the speed and success of reaction time responding in the rat: effects of age and intoxicated practice

An animal model of human reaction time (RT) was used to investigate the effects of age and intoxicated practice on the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects of ethanol (EtOH). Young (8-9 month) and old (24-26 month) Fischer 344 rats were trained to release a lever in response to an auditory and visual stimulus in order to avoid mild footshock. The animals were divided into groups to receive either intoxicated (EtOH-before) or unintoxicated (EtOH-after) RT testing. Successful avoidance and response latencies were impaired in young and old rats after the initial exposure to EtOH (EtOH-before group). Tolerance developed to EtOH's effects on successful avoidance and on response latencies whether or not the rats received intoxicated RT practice; however, intoxicated practice facilitated tolerance development to EtOH's effects on successful avoidance but not on response latencies. While the initial sensitivity and the level of tolerance that developed to EtOH's effects were similar in young and old rats, the old rats were generally more sensitive to EtOH and developed tolerance at a slower rate. These results suggest that tolerance develops to the effects of EtOH on RT and that intoxicated practice can have different effects on the parameters of the behavioral response.

Cellular and learned tolerances for ethanol hypothermia

Four groups of rats received ethanol: 1) intermittently while experiencing hypothermia, 2) chronically while experiencing hypothermia, 3) intermittently while protected from hypothermia, and 4) chronically while being protected from hypothermia. On postchronic testing, Group 1 showed tolerance to 2.0 and 2.3 but not 2.7 g/kg ethanol, Group 2 was tolerant to all 3 doses, Group 3 was tolerant to none, and Group 4 was tolerant only to 2.7 g/kg. On withdrawal of chronic ethanol or vehicle, Groups 1 and 2 showed trends to lose tolerance which became significant after subsequent extinction training. The treatments were repeated in other rats up to the postchronic test for tolerance, after which they were killed at 15-120 min after ethanol to assay serum and brain concentrations. Serum and brain levels of ethanol were higher in Groups 2 and 4 despite less intense hypothermia (i.e., no metabolic tolerance). Analysis of covariance indicated less tolerance in Group 1 vs. Group 2 and Group 3 vs. Group 4 for the same brain levels of ethanol (i.e., cellular tolerance in Groups 2 and 4). Therefore, both learned and cellular tolerances were observed in these subjects and appeared to be separable phenomena according to the various treatments imposed.

Factors regulating ethanol tolerance

Ethanol tolerance is a complex phenomenon. Its development is governed by pharmacological and behavioural, as well as genetic factors. The doses of ethanol employed and the duration of ethanol treatment are important pharmacological variables. Behavioural factors such as experience of intoxication and Pavlovian conditioning may also affect the development or manifestation of ethanol tolerance. Genetic factors can influence the development of tolerance directly or/and indirectly through its influence on the initial sensitivity to ethanol. The relevance and implication of tolerance, particularly conditioned tolerance in alcohol abuse and alcoholism, are discussed.