Glibenclamide pharmacokinetics in acarbose-treated type 2 diabetics

Reappraisal and perspectives of clinical drug-drug interaction potential of α-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose, voglibose and miglitol in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

1. Amidst the new strategies being developed for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with both established and newer therapies, alpha glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) have found a place in several treatment protocols. 2. The objectives of the review were: (a) to compile and evaluate the various clinical pharmacokinetic drug interaction data for AGIs such as acarbose, miglitol and voglibose; (b) provide perspectives on the drug interaction data since it encompasses coadministered drugs in several key areas of comorbidity with T2DM. 3. Critical evaluation of the interaction data suggested that the absorption and bioavailability of many coadministered drugs were not meaningfully affected from a clinical perspective. Therefore, on the basis of the current appraisal, none of the AGIs showed an alarming and/or overwhelming trend of interaction potential with several coadministered drugs. Hence, dosage adjustment is not warranted in the use of AGIs in T2DM patients in situations of comorbidity. 4. The newly evolving fixed dose combination strategies with AGIs need to be carefully evaluated to ensure that the absorption and bioavailability of the added drug are not impaired due to concomitant food ingestion.

Oral antidiabetic drug metabolism: pharmacogenomics and drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is progressive in nature and so to control cardiovascular risk, most patients need combinations of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) plus or minus insulin. Thus, drug-drug interactions may substantially contribute to harmful effects of intensive glucose lowering therapy.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was performed to select the most recent and relevant publications examining OAD metabolism and the effects of concomitant use of OADs.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Considering the individual sensitivity to OADs, pharmacogenetic factors could be of critical importance. The therapeutic range and efficacy as well as adverse effects of OADs may be significantly affected by genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 drug metabolising enzymes, organic cation transporters or organic anion transporting polypeptides. Although current data suggest that modest pharmacokinetics interferences among some OAD combinations exist, they do not seem to have substantial clinical consequences. As long-term adherence to multi-drug treatment is poor in diabetic patients, the future will show a strong move towards earlier treatment with combination therapies. As metformin is cardiovascular protective and is not metabolised through the hepatic cytochrome P450 system, it is a key compound for any OAD combination. There is an overwhelming amount of small-sized in vitro studies and investigations mostly including healthy volunteers dealing with short-term effects and surrogate parameters of concomitant OAD use. Further evidence from large-scale studies including typical subjects with type 2 diabetes, in particular multimorbid and geriatric patients with polypharmacy, is needed. Postmarketing surveillance using large patients' registries could be helpful to improve the early detection of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update

Because management of type 2 diabetes mellitus usually involves combined pharmacological therapy to obtain adequate glucose control and treatment of concurrent pathologies (especially dyslipidaemia and arterial hypertension), drug-drug interactions must be carefully considered with antihyperglycaemic drugs. Additive glucose-lowering effects have been extensively reported when combining sulphonylureas (or the new insulin secretagogues, meglitinide derivatives, i.e. nateglinide and repaglinide) with metformin, sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives) with thiazolidinediones (also called glitazones) and the biguanide compound metformin with thiazolidinediones. Interest in combining alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with either sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives), metformin or thiazolidinediones has also been demonstrated. These combinations result in lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels than with either monotherapy. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interferences have been reported with some combinations, they do not appear to have important clinical consequences. No significant adverse effects, except a higher risk of hypoglycaemic episodes that may be attributed to better glycaemic control, occur with any combination. Challenging the classical dual therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin, there is a recent trend to use alternative dual combinations (sulphonylurea plus thiazolidinedione or metformin plus thiazolidinedione). In addition, triple therapy with the addition of a thiazolidinedione to the metformin-sulphonylurea combination has been recently evaluated and allows glucose targets to be reached before insulin therapy is considered. This triple therapy appears to be safe, with no deleterious drug-drug interactions being reported so far.Potential interferences may also occur between glucose-lowering agents and other drugs, and such drug-drug interactions may have important clinical implications. Relevant pharmacological agents are those that are widely coadministered in diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents); those that have a narrow efficacy/toxicity ratio (e.g. digoxin, warfarin); or those that are known to induce (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibit (fluconazole) the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Metformin is currently a key compound in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, used either alone or in combination with other antihyperglycaemics. There are no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with metformin, because this compound is not metabolised and does not inhibit the metabolism of other drugs. In contrast, sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones are extensively metabolised in the liver via the CYP system and thus, may be subject to drug-drug metabolic interactions. Many HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are also metabolised via the CYP system. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interactions may occur, it is not clear whether drug-drug interactions between oral antihyperglycaemic agents and statins may have clinical consequences regarding both efficacy and safety. In contrast, a marked pharmacokinetic interference has been reported between gemfibrozil and repaglinide and, to a lesser extent, between gemfibrozil and rosiglitazone. This leads to a drastic increase in plasma concentrations of each antihyperglycaemic agent when they are coadministered with the fibric acid derivative, and an increased risk of adverse effects. Some antihypertensive agents may favour hypoglycaemic episodes when co-prescribed with sulphonylureas or meglitinide derivatives, especially ACE inhibitors, but this effect seems to result from a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction rather than from a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction. No, or only modest, interferences have been described with glucose-lowering agents and other pharmacological compounds such as digoxin or warfarin. The effects of inducers or inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the glucose-lowering agents of each pharmacological class has been tested. Significantly increased (with CYP inhibitors) or decreased (with CYP inducers) plasma levels of sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones have been reported in healthy volunteers, and these pharmacokinetic changes may lead to enhanced or reduced glucose-lowering action, and thus hypoglycaemia or worsening of metabolic control, respectively. In addition, some case reports have evidenced potential drug-drug interactions with various antihyperglycaemic agents that are usually associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia.

Postprandial Hyperglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The role of postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) in diabetes mellitus is being increasingly recognized. It is known that PPHG contributes to the increased risk of both micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. This review looks at the clinical significance of PPHG and the currently available therapeutic modalities. The causes of PPHG are influenced by many factors which include a rapid flux of glucose from the gut, impaired insulin release, endogenous glucose production by the liver and peripheral insulin resistance. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of PPHG is essential when adopting treatment options to tackle the problem. Although most oral antihyperglycemic agents and insulins lower both fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, drugs are now available which specifically act to control PPHG. These drugs may be classified based on the site of their action. alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors like acarbose and miglitol attenuate the rate of absorption of sucrose by acting on the luminal enzymes. Adverse effects of these agents are predominantly gastrointestinal. Newer insulin secretagogues have been developed which attempt to mimic the physiological release of insulin and thus ameliorate PPHG. These include third generation sulfonylureas like glimepiride and nonsulfonylurea secretagogues like repaglinide and nateglinide. Rapid-acting insulin analogs, the amino acid sequences of which have been altered such that they have a faster onset of action, help to specifically target PPHG. Pre-mixed formulations of the analogs have also been developed. Finally, drugs under development which hold promise in the management of patients with PPHG include pramlintide, an amylin analog, and glucagon-like peptide-1 and its analogs.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of Acarbose

Acarbose represents a new pharmacological approach to achieving the metabolic benefits of a slower carbohydrate absorption in diabetes, by acting as a potent, competitive inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases. Acarbose molecules attach to the carbohydrate binding sites of alpha-glucosidases, with an affinity constant that is much higher than that of the normal substrate. Because of the reversible nature of the inhibitor-enzyme interaction, the conversion of oligosaccharides to monosaccharides is only delayed rather than completely blocked. Acarbose has the structural features of a tetrasaccharide and does not cross the enterocytes after ingestion. Thus, its pharmacokinetic properties are well suited to the pharmacological action directed exclusively towards the intestinal glucosidases. The most important clinical consequence of the delayed carbohydrate digestion caused by acarbose is the attenuation of postprandial increases in blood glucose levels. Other effects have also been described: a decreased beta-pancreatic response to meals, and influences on gut hormone secretion and plasma lipid levels. Gastrointestinal discomfort is frequently reported as an adverse effect of acarbose administration, but incidence usually decreases with time. The suitability of acarbose for improving glucose homeostasis as an adjunct to dietary control or to administration of sulphonylureas or insulin has been extensively studied in patients both with type 1 (insulin-dependent) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Acarbose can be used as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes which is poorly controlled by diet alone. Moreover, the lack of bodyweight gain or hypoglycaemic effects reported during acarbose treatment may be advantageous for obese or elderly patients. Finally, the reduction in fluctuations of glucose levels throughout the day may help to control type 1 diabetes in patients with 'brittle diabetes'. Long term prospective studies are still needed to confirm these indications and the usefulness of acarbose in conditions other than diabetes, notably reactive hypoglycaemia and dumping syndrome.

Antihyperglycaemic agents. Drug interactions of clinical importance

Non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) affects middle-aged or elderly people who frequently have several other concomitant diseases, especially obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemias, coronary insufficiency, heart failure and arthropathies. Thus, polymedication is the rule in this population, and the risk of drug interactions is important, particularly in elderly patients. The present review is restricted to the interactions of other drugs with antihyperglycaemic compounds, and will not consider the mirror image, i.e. the interactions of antihyperglycaemic agents with other drugs. Oral antihyperglycaemic agents include sulphonylureas, biguanides--essentially metformin since the withdrawn of phenformin and buformin--and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, acarbose being the only representative on the market. These drugs can be used alone or in combination to obtain better metabolic control, sometimes with insulin. Drug interactions with antihyperglycaemic agents can be divided into pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Most pharmacokinetic studies concern sulphonylureas, whose action may be enhanced by numerous other drugs, thus increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia. Such an effect may result essentially from protein binding displacement, inhibition of hepatic metabolism and reduction of renal clearance. Reduction of the hypoglycaemic activity of sulphonylureas due to pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs appears to be much less frequent. Drug interactions leading to an increase in plasma metformin concentrations, mainly by reducing the renal excretion or the hepatic metabolism of the biguanide, should be avoided to limit the risk of hyperlactaemia. Owing to its mode of action, pharmacokinetic interferences with acarbose are limited to the gastrointestinal tract, but have not been extensively studied yet. Pharmacodynamic interactions are quite numerous and may result in a potentiation of the hypoglycaemic action or, conversely, in a deterioration of blood glucose control. Such interactions may be observed whatever the type of antidiabetic treatment. They result from the intrinsic properties of the coprescribed drug on insulin secretion and action, or on a key step of carbohydrate metabolism. Finally, a combination of 2 to 3 antihyperglycaemic agents is common for treating patients with NIDDM to benefit from the synergistic effect of compounds acting on different sites of carbohydrate metabolism. Possible pharmacokinetic interactions between alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and classical antidiabetic oral agents should be better studied in the diabetic population.

Reduction of the acute bioavailability of metformin by the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose in normal man

In a double-blind cross-over study, we investigated a possible influence of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose on the bioavailability of the biguanide compound metformin. Each of the six healthy young male volunteers was randomly allocated during two consecutive 7 day periods to either acarbose (days 1-3: 3 x 50 mg day-1; days 4-7: 3 x 100 mg day-1) or placebo. At day 7 and 14 of the study, the overnight-fasted subjects ingested 1000 mg metformin with the first bite of a standardized breakfast (500 kcal; 60 g carbohydrates) and together with either placebo or 100 mg acarbose. Acarbose significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the meal-induced increase in blood glucose and plasma insulin levels. Acarbose induced a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in early (90, 120, 180 min) serum levels, peak concentrations (Cmax: 1.22 +/- 0.14 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.60 mg l-1) and area under the curve of metformin (AUC 0-540 min: 423 +/- 55 vs. 652 +/- 55 mg min l-1), but did not diminish its 24 h urinary excretion. In conclusion, acarbose significantly reduces the acute bioavailability of metformin in normal subjects.

The use of acarbose in the prevention and treatment of hypoglycaemia

This paper reviews the use of acarbose in the prevention and treatment of hypoglycaemia. In diet- or sulfonylurea-treated patients, acarbose may reduce the incidence of late postprandial hypoglycaemia. In insulin-treated patients, acarbose treatment usually requires reduction of the insulin dose; one study has shown that 100 mg acarbose at night significantly reduces the incidence of mid-evening and nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Several studies have suggested acarbose to be a useful adjunct to the management of reactive hypoglycaemia in the non-diabetic patients. Long-term prospective studies are still needed to document this last indication of acarbose or other alpha-glycosidase inhibitors.

Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The initial management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) should include patient education, dietary counselling and, when feasible, individualised physical activity. It is only when such measures fail that drug therapy should be considered. Dietary management of NIDDM includes a restriction in calories, and these should be appropriately distributed as carbohydrates, lipids and proteins. Supplementation of the diet with soluble fibre and supplementation with magnesium salts if hypomagnesaemia is demonstrated, is recommended. However, supplementation with fish oils or with fish oil-derived omega-3 fatty acids is not currently recommended. Oral drug therapies used in NIDDM include sulphonylurea derivatives, which are a first-line treatment in patients who are not grossly obese, metformin, which is the treatment of choice for obese patients, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose, which are used mainly to reduce postprandial blood glucose peaks. These types of drugs can be used alone or in combination. Insulin therapy may be required to achieve adequate control of blood glucose levels in some patients. In several instances, it is suggested that insulin therapy be combined with sulphonylureas (essentially when residual insulin secretion is present), with metformin, or with alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. The treatment of disorders associated with NIDDM, such as obesity, hypertension or hyperlipidaemia, requires particular attention in diabetic patients, since some drugs can adversely affect glycaemic control. Oral drugs for the treatment of NIDDM include sulphonylurea derivatives used in first-line treatment in patients who are not grossly obese, metformin, which is often the treatment of choice for obese patients and, more recently, the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, such as acarbose, which are effective in reducing the postprandial rise in blood glucose.

Acarbose. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential

Acarbose delays the production of monosaccharides (notably glucose) by inhibiting the alpha-glucosidases associated with the brush-border membrane of the small intestine which are responsible for the digestion of complex polysaccharides and sucrose. In healthy subjects acarbose 100 to 200 mg significantly inhibits postprandial glucose, insulin and triglyceride responses, with some evidence of carbohydrate malabsorption with the higher dose. Clinical trials in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus showed that acarbose improved diabetic control, especially postprandial blood glucose levels, independent of whether the patients were receiving concomitant oral antidiabetic drugs in addition to dietary management. In comparative studies acarbose was significantly superior to placebo, and comparable to biguanides, when used alone or as an adjuvant to sulphonylurea therapy. Trials in patients requiring insulin to control their diabetes demonstrated that acarbose significantly reduced postprandial blood glucose concentrations, resulting in a smoother diurnal blood glucose-time curve and improved symptoms associated with nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Daily insulin requirements were sometimes reduced. In large multicentre trials acarbose up to 600 mg/day for 3 to 12 months improved glycaemic control in approximately 55% of patients with non-insulin-dependent or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Apart from its use in diabetes, encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with acarbose in other therapeutic areas such as dumping syndrome, reactive hypoglycaemia, and types IIb and IV hyperlipoproteinaemias--however, further clinical experience is needed in these settings before clear conclusions can be drawn. No serious side effects have been reported during treatment with acarbose, although it is associated with a high incidence of troublesome gastrointestinal symptoms such as flatulence, abdominal distension, borborygmus and diarrhoea. The incidence of these reactions usually decreases with time. Thus, acarbose represents the first of a new class of oral antidiabetic drugs--the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. It has proven useful for improving glycaemic control when used as an adjunct to standard therapy involving dietary restriction, oral antidiabetic drugs and/or subcutaneous insulin. That being the case, acarbose should provide the clinician with an interesting treatment option which can be used in a broad range of patients with diabetes mellitus in whom 'traditional' management approaches produce suboptimal glycaemic control.

Effect of two new alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in insulin-dependent diabetic patients

The delay in glucose absorption at the intestinal level obtained with the administration of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors may contribute to an improved metabolic control in diabetic patients. We have examined the effects of two new compounds, BAY m 1099 (short acting) and BAY o 1248 (long acting), on the postprandial glycemic changes, the insulin requirements and the meal-induced hormone responses in nine insulin-dependent diabetics (IDD). The investigation was conducted according to a protocol in which medication and placebo were administered in a double-blind randomized manner. Twelve hours before each experimental day, the patients were connected to the Biostator GCIIS (Ames-Miles) to maintain stabilized normoglycemic levels for the whole period of study. The results showed that: (1) BAY m 1099 decreased the 4-h postprandial glycemic excursions compared to placebo both at dinner and breakfast (P less than 0.05), (2) BAY o 1248 when compared with placebo showed a significant lowering of the peak glycemic levels at breakfast (P less than 0.001) and at lunch (P less than 0.0025), (3) the 2-h and 4-h post-breakfast insulin requirements fell significantly after either drug (P less than 0.02), (4) the plasma levels of contrainsular hormones were not affected by drugs or placebo at any time during the period of study, and (5) no side effects with either drug could be detected. We conclude from our study that both drugs may be useful adjuncts to insulin therapy in insulin-dependent diabetics by reducing postprandial glycemic fluctuations as well as by decreasing insulin requirements with no modification of the meal-induced hormone responses.