Behavioral studies using genetically defined mice--a bibliography (July 1976-August 1978)

What can genetic models tell us about behavioral plasticity?

Biological diversity and learning have played an essential interactive role in the evolution of species, as intra-specific individual differences have exerted a buffering effect towards environmental changes, and learning ability per se has allowed their maintenance. By exploiting biological diversity individuals with defective learning and memory have been produced that allow the study of the neural substrates of encoding mechanisms, as has been done in studies from Drosophila to rodents. Various aspects of this neurogenetic approach are reviewed and pitfalls are indicated. It is clear that genetic models need to be implemented by an integrated multidisciplinary top-down approach based on behavioral, electrophysiological, histochemical, immunocytochemical and neurochemical techniques. Examples are presented from some animal models that illustrate how a systems level analysis of the neural substrates of information processing can be carried out using such an integrated scheme.

Using genetically-defined rodent strains for the identification of hippocampal traits relevant for two-way avoidance behavior: a non-invasive approach

Genetically-defined rodent strains permit the identification of hippocampal traits which are of functional relevance for the performance of two-way avoidance behavior. This is exemplified here by analyzing the relationship between infrapyramidal mossy fibers (a tiny projection terminating upon the basal dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons) and two-way avoidance learning in about 800 animals. The necessary steps include 1) identification of structural traits sensitive to selective breeding for extremes in two-way avoidance, 2) testing the robustness of the associations found by studying individual and genetical correlations between hippocampal traits and behavior, 3) establishing causal relationships by Mendelian crossing of strains with extreme structural traits and studying the behavioral consequences of such structural 'randomization', 4) confirming causal relationships by manipulating the structural variable in inbred (isogenic) strains, thereby eliminating the possibility of genetic linkage, and 5) ruling out the possibility of spurious associations by studying the correlations between the hippocampal trait and other behaviors known to depend on hippocampal functioning. In comparison with the classical lesion approach for identifying relationships between brain and behavior, the present procedure appears to be superior in two aspects: it is non-invasive, and it focuses automatically on those brain traits which are used by natural selection to shape behaviorally-defined animal populations, i.e., it reveals the natural regulators of behavior.

A fit mouse is a hoppy mouse: jumping behavior in 15-day-old Mus musculus

An analysis of a juvenile hopping response from an 8 X 8 diallel cross is used to demonstrate the experimental genetic approach for testing presumed adaptive fitness of behaviors in developing organisms. In accordance with predictions, the explosive jumping behavior exhibited by 15-day mice is characterized by a pattern of genetic dominance toward high expression of the trait. Wild mice show even more vigorous responses, indicating that selection pressures maintaining high responding have been relaxed during domestication. These data suggest some applications and limitations of genetic methods for the study of behavioral evolution as related to development.

An overview of neurobiological comparisons in mouse strains

A literature review of research dealing with mouse strain comparisons along neurobiological parameters is presented in tabular form which provides a rank-ordering of strains and estimates of percentage differences in individual parameters. Drawing from 86 references, three tables deal respectively, with comparisons of neurochemical, neuroanatomical, and neuropsychophysiological parameters.