Omeprazole. Overview and opinion

Factors Associated with Gastric Black Spot, White Flat Elevated Mucosa, and Cobblestone-Like Mucosa: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Previous studies have reported a possible relevance between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and 3 new gastric mucosal changes: black spots (BSs), white flat elevated mucosa (WFEM), and cobblestone-like mucosa (CLM). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between these mucosal changes and multiple factors including PPI use.

METHODS

All subjects who underwent a routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were successively enrolled. Endoscopists carried out the EGD after being blinded about -information on patient PPI usage and determined the presence of these mucosal changes. The ratio of each factor was -compared in cases with and without each gastric finding.

RESULTS

Out of 1,214 patients, BSs were recognized in 75 (6.2%) cases, WFEM in 59 (4.9%), and CLM in 41 (3.4%). In logistic regression analysis, PPI use was significantly correlated with all of these findings (BSs: OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.66-5.21), (WFEM: OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.94-6.61), and (CLM: OR 4.57; 95% CI 2.34-9.96), and Helicobacter pylori eradication was related to BSs (OR 3.01; 95% CI 1.73-5.24) and WFEM (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.11). Decision-tree analyses showed that H. pylori eradication was associated with all findings.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the considered findings were correlated with PPI and H. pylori eradication.

Adverse Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Platelet Count: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective and preferred class of drugs used to treat peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and other diseases associated with increased production of gastric acid. PPIs in general have an excellent long-term safety profile and are well-tolerated. However, studies have shown some adverse reactions (e.g., osteoporosis, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, Vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, and acute interstitial nephritis) on long-term PPI use. Thrombocytopenia attributed to use of PPIs has been described in a few case reports and a retrospective study. In this case report, we describe a case of PPI-induced thrombocytopenia. In our patient, thrombocytopenia immediately developed after the initiation of PPI on two separate occasions and resolved after its discontinuation. The strong association found in our case implies the potential role of PPI in causing this rare but serious adverse reaction. Based on this case report and the observation from other studies, a PPI-induced adverse event should be considered as a possible etiology for new-onset idiopathic thrombocytopenia.

Interactions of omeprazole-based analogues with cytochrome P450 2C19: a computational study

Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is one of 57 drug metabolizing enzymes in humans and is responsible for the metabolism of ∼7-10% of drugs in clinical use. Recently omeprazole-based analogues were reported to be the potent inhibitors of CYP2C19 and have the potential to be used as the tool compounds for studying the substrate selectivity of CYP2C19. However, the binding modes of these compounds with CYP2C19 remain to be elucidated. In this study, a combination of molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD), and MM/GBSA calculations was employed to systematically investigate the interactions between these compounds and CYP2C19. The binding modes of these analogues were analyzed in detail. The results indicated that the inclusion of explicit active site water molecules could improve binding energy prediction when the water molecules formed a hydrogen bonding network between the ligand and protein. We also found that the effect of active site water molecules on binding free energy prediction was dependent on the ligand binding modes. Our results unravel the interactions of these omeprazole-based analogues with CYP2C19 and might be helpful for the future design of potent CYP2C19 inhibitors with improved metabolic properties.

Effects of protein flexibility and active site water molecules on the prediction of sites of metabolism for cytochrome P450 2C19 substrates

Structure-based prediction of sites of metabolism (SOMs) mediated by cytochrome P450s (CYPs) is of great interest in drug discovery and development.

Cognitive impact after short-term exposure to different proton pump inhibitors: assessment using CANTAB software

Introduction

Studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase the brain burden of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and also create vitamin B₁₂ deficiency. However, these two phenomena have deleterious effect on cognition and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Since the use of PPIs has increased tremendously for the last few years, it is of great public health importance to investigate the cognitive impact of PPIs. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the degree of neuropsychological association of each PPI with different cognitive functions.

Methods

Sixty volunteers of either gender were recruited and divided randomly into six groups: five test groups for five classes of PPIs and one control group. All the groups participated in the five computerized neuropsychological tests (nine subtests) of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery twice: at the beginning of the study and 7 days thereafter.

Results

We found statistically and clinically significant impairment in visual memory, attention, executive function, and working and planning function. One-way analysis of variance findings showed that all PPIs had a similar negative impact on cognition. However, paired-samples t tests indicated that omeprazole showed significant (p < 0.05) results in seven subtests; lansoprazole and pantoprazole showed significant results in five subtests; and rabeprazole showed significant results in four subtests. Among five classes of PPIs, esomeprazole showed comparatively less impact on cognitive function with significant results in three subtests.

Conclusions

The present study reveals for the first time that different PPIs have varying degrees of influence on different cognitive domains and have associations with AD. These findings should be considered when balancing the risks and benefits of prescribing these medications. A study done for a longer period of time with a larger sample size might yield better results.

Long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the development of gastric pre-malignant lesions

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs to reduce gastric acid secretion. PPIs are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medications worldwide. Apart from short-term application, maintenance therapy with PPIs is recommended and increasingly used in certain diseases, such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, especially for people with erosive oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus. Although PPIs are generally safe, their efficacy and safety of long-term use remains unclear. The question of whether the long-term use of PPIs could promote the development of gastric pre-malignant lesions has been widely investigated, but results are inconsistent. Limited insight on this problem leads to a dilemma in decision making for long-term PPI prescription.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the development or progression of gastric pre-malignant lesions, such as atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell hyperplasia, and dysplasia, in people taking long-term (six months or greater) PPI maintenance therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases (from inception to 6 August 2013): the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. In addition, we searched the reference lists of included trials and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (aged 18 years or greater) concerning the effects of long-term (six months or greater) PPI use on gastric mucosa changes, confirmed by endoscopy or biopsy sampling (or both).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed selection of eligible trials, assessment of trial quality, and data extraction. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for analysis of dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven trials (1789 participants). Four studies had high risk of bias and the risk of bias in the other three trials was unclear. In addition, it was difficult to assess possible reporting bias. We pooled 1070 participants from four RCTs to evaluate corporal atrophy development revealing an insignificantly increased OR of 1.50 (95% CI 0.59 to 3.80; P value = 0.39; low-quality evidence) for long-term PPI users relative to non-PPI users. In five eligible trials, corporal intestinal metaplasia was assessed among 1408 participants, also with uncertain results (OR 1.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 5.03; P value = 0.55; low-quality evidence). However, by pooling data of 1705 participants from six RCTs, our meta-analysis showed that participants with PPI maintenance treatment were more likely to experience either diffuse (simple) (OR 5.01; 95% CI 1.54 to 16.26; P value = 0.007; very-low-quality evidence) or linear/micronodular (focal) ECL hyperplasia (OR 3.98; 95% CI 1.31 to 12.16; P value = 0.02; low-quality evidence) than controls. No participant showed any dysplastic or neoplastic change in any included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is presently no clear evidence that the long-term use of PPIs can cause or accelerate the progression of corpus gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, although results were imprecise. People with PPI maintenance treatment may have a higher possibility of experiencing either diffuse (simple) or linear/micronodular (focal) ECL cell hyperplasia. However, the clinical importance of this outcome is currently uncertain.

CYP2C19- and CYP3A4-Dependent Omeprazole Metabolism in West Mexicans

Omeprazole has been used as a drug probe for CYP2C19, but no systematic data are available for Mexican populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the phenotype frequencies of the CYP2C19 polymorphism in West Mexicans. Besides omeprazole, sulfone was measured to evaluate CYP3A4 after administration of the 20-mg dose to 127 healthy volunteers. Logarithms of metabolic indexes of omeprazole/hydroxyomeprazole for CYP2C19 and omeprazole/omeprazole sulfone for CYP3A4 had trimodal distributions. Five subjects (4%) had a log CYP2C19 metabolic index below -0.9, suggesting an ultra-extensive phenotype. Poor metabolizers (log metabolic index > 0.6) were 6%. For CYP3A4, 11 subjects (9%) were below -0.3 of the log metabolic index. The log metabolic index of omeprazole/omeprazole sulfone was above the antimode of 0.6 for 11% of this population. The mean log metabolic index of CYP3A4 extensive metabolizers (80%) was 0.166, which seems to be higher than the data described for Caucasians and lower than that for Asians.

Proton pump inhibitors: the good, the bad, and the unwanted

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medications in the United States. By inhibiting gastric H/K adenosine triphosphatase via covalent binding to the cysteine residues of the proton pump, they provide the most potent acid suppression available. Long-term PPI use accounts for the majority of total PPI use. Absolute indications include peptic ulcer disease, chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use, treatment of Helicobacter pylori, and erosive esophagitis. Although PPIs are generally considered safe, numerous adverse effects, particularly associated with long-term use have been reported. Many patients receiving chronic PPI therapy do not have clear indications for their use, prompting consideration for reduction or discontinuation of their use. This article reviews the indications for PPI use, the adverse effects/risks involved with their use, and conditions in which their use is controversial.

Ligand-based design of a potent and selective inhibitor of cytochrome P450 2C19

A series of omeprazole-based analogues was synthesized and assessed for inhibitory activity against CYP2C19. The data was used to build a CYP2C19 inhibition pharmacophore model for the series. The model was employed to design additional analogues with inhibitory potency against CYP2C19. Upon identifying inhibitors of CYP2C19, ligand-based design shifted to attenuating the rapid clearance observed for many of the inhibitors. While most analogues underwent metabolism on their aliphatic side chain, metabolite identification indicated that for analogues such as compound 30 which contain a heterocycle adjacent to the sulfur moiety, metabolism primarily occurred on the benzimidazole moiety. Compound 30 exhibited improved metabolic stability (Cl(int) = 12.4 mL/min/nmol) and was selective in regard to inhibition of CYP2C19-catalyzed (S)-mephenytoin hydroxylation in human liver microsomes. Finally, representative compounds were docked into a homology model of CYP2C19 in an effort to understand the enzyme-ligand interactions that may lead to favorable inhibition or metabolism properties.

The impact of benzodiazepines on safe driving

OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines are prescribed to relieve anxiety and aid sleep. Studies demonstrate that benzodiazepines increase odds of crash involvement, but little evidence exists regarding their impact on crash responsibility. We examined the impact of benzodiazepines on crash responsibility by drug half-life and driver age, using a case-control design with drivers aged 20 and over involved in fatal crashes in the United States from 1993-2006.

METHODS

Drivers (all with BAC = 0) were classified as having no benzodiazepines detected versus short, intermediate, or long half-life benzodiazepines. Cases were drivers with at least one potentially unsafe driving action (UDA) in relation to the crash (e.g., speeding), a proxy measure for crash responsibility; controls had no UDAs recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) of any UDA by benzodiazepines half-life exposure were calculated, with adjustment for age, sex, other medication usage, and prior driving record.

RESULTS

Compared with drivers not using benzodiazepines, drivers taking intermediate or long half-life benzodiazepines demonstrated increased odds of an UDA from ages 25 (intermediate OR: 1.59; 95% CI = 1.08, 2.33; long OR: 1.68; 95% CI = 1.34, 2.12) to 55 (intermediate OR: 1.50; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.06; long OR: 1.33; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.57). Drivers taking short half-life benzodiazepines did not demonstrate increased odds compared to drivers not using benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the potential impact of benzodiazepines on driver safety, further experimental research is needed to better understand the effect of benzodiazepines on crash responsibility.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux and chronic sinusitis

In patients with chronic and recurrent sinusitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux disease may play a significant role. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease differs from gastroesophageal reflux disease in the extent of reflux (into the hypopharynx and above) as well as timing (occurring more often when the patient is upright). Most patients are unaware of the extent of their symptoms, and diagnostic tools such as pH probe, multichannel intraluminal impedance, and manometry are required for adequate diagnosis. Although therapy with lifestyle modification and acid-suppressive agents may improve reflux in the majority of patients, for many with persistent symptoms, endoscopic or surgical intervention is required to reduce reflux successfully.

Omeprazole may be superior to famotidine in the management of iatrogenic ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acid suppressing agents are widely used to treat the iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric neoplasms. However, the relative merits of proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2)-receptor antagonist for endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulcers are not known.

AIM

To prospectively compare omeprazole and famotidine for the healing of endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulcers and for bleeding control.

METHODS

After endoscopic mucosal resection, patients were randomly assigned to omeprazole (20 mg/day) or to famotidine (40 mg/day) group for a 28-day treatment period. The ulcer sizes and stages, bleeding rates and ulcer-related symptoms were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were randomized equally to each group. Forty-one patients in each group were finally compared. The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Twenty-eight days after treatment, the two groups were not different with respect to ulcer stage (P = 0.137) or ulcer reduction ratio (P = 0.380). No difference was observed with respect to ulcer-related symptoms (P = 0.437) and no bleeding episode occurred in any of the 82 patients. In subgroup that underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, fewer patients in the omeprazole group showed active ulcers than those in the famotidine group (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that omeprazole may be superior to famotidine for iatrogenic ulcers following endoscopic mucosal resection, especially for large ulcers.

[An overview of acetic acid ulcer models and their utility for drug screening]

Since Takagi et al. reported an experimental chronic gastric ulcer model [acetic acid ulcers induced by submucosal injection of acetic acid (Type 1)], we further modified the methodology and subsequently devised three more models. The second model involves inducing ulcers by serosal application of an acetic acid solution (Type 2) and the third model achieves ulcer induction by intragastric application of an acetic acid solution (Type 3). The forth model was modification of the third model by giving the acetic acid solution and the same volume of air to make one ulcer in the stomach (Type 4). In general, animals accepted the procedures without problems and no undesirable effects were noticed. More importantly, this experimental animal model allows production of ulcers that highly resemble human ulcers in terms of both pathology and healing. Indeed, relapse is even endoscopically observed for 360 days after ulceration. The ulcers produced not only respond well to various anti-ulcer medications, such as antisecretory and mucosal protective drugs and growth factors, but also demonstrate appropriate responses to ulcerogenic agents such as NSAIDs. In addition, we have recently demonstrated that H. pylori infection resulted in delayed ulcer healing and recurrence of healed acetic acid ulcers induced in Mongolian gerbils. The present article gives a brief summary of the ulcer history before establishment of acetic acid ulcers and characteristic features of acetic acid ulcer, including both their merits and shortcomings.

Patterns of proton pump inhibitor use in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Little is known about differences between gastroenterologists and primary care physicians in their patterns of prescribing proton pump inhibitors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A survey of practicing primary care physicians from the American Board of Medical Specialties and practicing gastroenterologists from the American Gastroenterological Association was conducted by facsimile. The survey instrument consisted of 13 questions about pharmacokinetics and administration of proton pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 15% (491 of 3273), and 80% (395 of 491) of respondents were nontrainee gastroenterologists or primary care physicians. Approximately 90% (n = 355) of eligible respondents correctly identified proton pump inhibitors as inhibitors of H+,K+-adenosinetriphosphatase. Proton pump inhibitors were prescribed by 80% (n = 314) of each group for reflux esophagitis. They were prescribed by 67% (122 of 182) of gastroenterologists and 27% (58 of 213) of primary care physicians to prevent ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P <0.001). And they were prescribed by 40% (n = 73) of gastroenterologists and 16% (n = 34) of primary care physicians for uncomplicated heartburn (P <0.001). Proton pump inhibitors were prescribed before a meal by 95% (n = 173) of gastroenterologists and 33% (n = 70) of primary care physicians (P <0.001). Nearly 99% (n = 391) of respondents agreed that proton pump inhibitors were safe, but only 15% (n = 59) thought they should be available without prescription.

CONCLUSION

Our survey suggests that the use of proton pump inhibitors differs between gastroenterologists and primary care physicians. Furthermore, although most physicians believe that proton pump inhibitors are safe, few believe that they should be available without a prescription.

Adenocarcinoma of the rat esophagus in the presence of a proton pump inhibitor: a pilot study

This study examines the effects of a proton pump inhibitor on a rat model of duodenogastric reflux. Duodenoesophageal reflux was induced in 60 rats by performing a duodenesophagostomy. The study group received daily intraperitoneal injections of a proton pump inhibitor for 6 months and the control group received an equivalent injection of saline. Rats were examined at death for macroscopic tumor, dysplasia, adenocystic changes, papillomatosis, and adenocarcinoma. Five out of 19 rats in the study group and three out of 20 rats in the control group developed dysplastic/adenocarcinomatous changes. Ten of the rats in the study group died before the end of the study, as opposed to one in the control group (this is not statistically significant). There was no difference in the number of cancers that developed in the two groups. However, there was an insignificant trend to earlier appearance of detectable disease in the study group.

Assay of omeprazole and omeprazole sulfone by semi-microcolumn liquid chromatography with mixed-function precolumn

A column-switching system based on semi-microcolumns was used for direct analysis of omeprazole and omeprazole sulfone in human plasma samples. Plasma samples were injected into a mixed-function (MF Ph-1) column (35 mmx4.6 mm I.D.) to remove proteins and other non-specific peak producing substances from the analyte-containing time zone. The analyte-containing fraction was thereafter transferred to a C-18 semi-microcolumn (250 mmx1.5 mm I.D.) after concentration at the C-18 intermediate column. The absorbance at 302 nm in a ultraviolet (UV) detector was recorded to measure the concentration. The detection limit for omeprazole and omeprazole sulfone in the present method was 10 ng/ml. Interbatch variation (coefficient of variation) of the QC samples spanned less than 10% and intra-batch variation less than 2%. The recovery ratios of omeprazole and omeprazole sulfone were over 98%. The current method can be used as a simpler procedure with similar sensitivity and reproducibility as previously reported methods.

Nasogastric lansoprazole is effective in suppressing gastric acid secretion in critically ill patients

AIM

To evaluate the effect of nasogastric lansoprazole on acid suppression in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Patients were eligible for the study if they had a nasogastric tube in place and had not received acid-suppressive agents for 3 days prior to enrolment into the study. Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding or a baseline gastric pH > 4.0 were excluded. Patients served as their own controls during a 24 h lead-in period. Lansoprazole 30 mg was administered once daily with water through a nasogastric tube for 2 days. Intragastric pH was measured by continuous 24 h pH-metry for 3 days.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled into the study. The baseline median 24 h intragastric pH was 2.25 +/- 1.01, and increased to 6.70 +/- 0.82 (P= 0.001) after 2 days of lansoprazole. Mean percentage of time intragastric pH was > or = 4.0 was 25 +/- 13% at baseline, and increased to 84 +/- 14% (P=0. 001) after 2 days of lansoprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasogastric lansoprazole 30 mg daily is effective in suppressing gastric acid secretion in critically ill patients.

Pharmacologic considerations in the treatment of neonatal septicemia and its complications

This article focuses on the pharmacologic properties of drugs commonly used in the treatment of neonatal septicemia and its complications. Rational therapy demands an awareness of not only the pharmacology of individual drugs but also the interactions and anticipated fate of such drugs in the rapidly changing physiologic environment of the neonate. Further research in the area of equine neonatal pharmacology should greatly assist our understanding of the impact of the disease state on the unique physiology of the newborn and should allow us to better predict the ultimate fate of drugs commonly used for such purposes. Careful dosing and close monitoring of pharmacologic effects are critical for a successful outcome. In the future, newer therapeutic strategies that are safe and efficacious may provide a means to circumvent many of the problems currently encountered with treating the septicemic newborn foal.

Double-blind comparison of lansoprazole 15 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with healed duodenal ulcers resistant to H2-receptor antagonists

BACKGROUND

Maintenance antisecretory therapy is often used to prevent duodenal ulcer recurrence and control symptoms. This study compared the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg daily with placebo in preventing ulcer recurrence in patients with a recent history of duodenal ulcer disease.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were treated with either lansoprazole 15 mg, 30 mg or placebo o.m.

RESULTS

Within 1 month of study initiation, 27% (four out of 15) of placebo-treated patients experienced ulcer recurrence as compared to 13% (two out of 15) and 6% (one out of 18) of lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg treated patients, respectively. Median time to first ulcer recurrence was > 12 months in lansoprazole patients. At Month 12, significantly (P < 0.001) more lansoprazole 15 mg patients (70%) and lansoprazole 30 mg patients (85%) remained healed. Eighty-two per cent of lansoprazole 15 mg and 76% of lansoprazole 30 mg patients remained asymptomatic during the entire study period. All placebo patients became symptomatic, experienced ulcer recurrence, or withdrew from the study by month six. The incidence of adverse events was comparable among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole safely and effectively reduces duodenal ulcer recurrence and ulcer-related symptoms.

Safety, acceptability and endoscopic findings in foals and yearling horses treated with a paste formulation of omeprazole for twenty-eight days

A paste formulation of the H+,K(+)-ATPase inhibitor omeprazole was evaluated in Thoroughbred foals and yearlings for its safety and acceptability. Twenty foals age 11-16 weeks and 20 yearling horses age 15-17 months were included and gastroscopic examinations performed 1-3 days before and at the end of each trial. Lesions were scored on a scale of 0 to 3 and animals allocated based on endoscopic lesion score and sex, with 4 animals in each of 5 replicates. Dosages of 4 mg omeprazole/kg bwt or sham treatment were administered once daily for 28 days, from a syringe graduated in 50 lb (22.68 kg) increments, the amount of paste administered being rounded up to the nearest corresponding weight in pounds. Acceptability of the paste or sham treatment was assessed and recorded by the individual administering the treatment on the basis of the tolerance or resistance to insertion of the syringe into the mouth, administration of the paste and if the paste was swallowed or actively expelled by the animal. Safety was determined on the basis of daily observation recordings and physical examination findings during and at the conclusion of the trial. Treatment was judged to have been accepted for all 420 doses of omeprazole paste and all 140 sham doses given to foals during the trial and for 418/420 doses of paste and all 140 sham doses given to yearlings. Two doses of paste were entirely rejected by yearlings. On the initial endoscopic examination, lesions were observed in the gastric squamous epithelial mucosa in 4 foals and 3 yearlings, and single small, superficial erosions were seen in the gastric glandular mucosa of 2 foals. On the second examination there were small, superficial erosions in the squamous mucosa in 3 foals and 2 yearlings, multi-focal superficial erosions in 1 foal and 1 yearling, and 1 foal had large areas of erosion extending from the margo plicatus toward the dorsal fundus. No lesions in the glandular mucosa were seen in foals or yearlings. There were no significant differences (P < 0.05) in lesion scores between the beginning and the end of the trials in the omeprazole-treated or sham-treated groups of foals or yearlings. A paste formulation of omeprazole, administered at a dose of 4 mg/kg bwt once daily for 28 days, was determined to be highly acceptable to the foals and yearlings we studied, and no adverse effects attributable to the medication were noted.

First line treatment with omeprazole provides an effective and superior alternative strategy in the management of dyspepsia compared to antacid/alginate liquid: a multicentre study in general practice

BACKGROUND

Many patients who present with dyspepsia are prescribed antacid/alginates as their first line and often mainstay therapy. This multicentre study was designed to assess whether early introduction of acid inhibition is an effective strategy in dyspepsia management.

METHODS

Dyspeptic patients (n = 674) were randomized to receive either omeprazole 10 mg o.m. or antacid/alginate liquid 10 mL q.d.s. for 4 weeks in an open, parallel group study.

RESULTS

Complete relief of the most common symptom at entry, heartburn, was greater in the omeprazole-treated group compared with the antacid/alginate-treated group (64 vs. 30%, respectively, at 4 weeks; P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who met the stringent health target of complete relief of overall symptoms was higher in the omeprazole-treated group (41% at 4 weeks) compared with the antacid/alginate group (16% at 4 weeks; P < 0.0001). Comparisons of quality of life scores between treatments favoured the omeprazole group at 2 and 4 weeks for both the Psychological General Well-Being Index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (each P < or = 0.0009). In addition, a greater proportion of patients rated omeprazole to be more effective in symptom relief and more convenient to use (each P = 0.0001) than antacid/alginate.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that, compared to antacid/alginate liquid 10 mL q.d.s., omeprazole 10 mg o.m. is more effective in the management of dyspepsia symptoms and is the patients' preferred treatment.

A placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of lansoprazole in the management of reflux esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy of three different doses of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole in the management of reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-two patients with endoscopically confirmed reflux esophagitis were enrolled in a double-blind, multicenter study and were randomized to lansoprazole 15, 30, or 60 mg or placebo administered once daily for 8 wk.

RESULTS

Healing rates after 4 wk of lansoprazole 15, 30, and 60 mg/d were 67.6%, 81.3%, and 80.6%, respectively. These were all significantly superior (p < 0.001) to placebo, which produced endoscopic healing in only 32.8% of the patients after 4 wk. The 4-wk healing rates with lansoprazole 30 or 60 mg were significantly higher than that with lansoprazole 15 mg (p < 0.05), confirming a dose-response effect. Cumulative healing rates after 8 wk of treatment were 52.5% with placebo and 90.0%, 95.4%, and 94.4% with lansoprazole 15, 30, and 60 mg, respectively (p < 0.001 for all doses of lansoprazole vs placebo). Lansoprazole was also significantly superior to placebo in relieving symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis. Lansoprazole was well tolerated, and no serious treatment-related adverse events were encountered. Up to 3 months after discontinuation of treatment, all lansoprazole-treated groups had more patients free of endoscopic evidence of esophagitis than the group treated with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole was safe and effective for the treatment of reflux esophagitis in this trial. This study indicates that the optimum daily dose of lansoprazole for reflux esophagitis is 30 mg.

Management in general practice of patients with persistent dyspepsia. A decision analysis

To determine whether an empirical drug treatment strategy (empirical group) instead of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy followed by treatment (conventional group) in patients with persistent dyspepsia increases appropriate use of endoscopy facilities, we did a decision analysis based on data found in the literature. We estimated the percentage of patients having an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 1 year, the percentage of patients with symptom relief, and the average medical costs per patient for both groups. In the empirical group, fewer patients (38%) had upper gastrointestinal endoscopies compared with the conventional group. Furthermore, an additional 5% of patients in the empirical group experienced symptom relief, and the average medical costs per patient were estimated to be 8% less in this group when compared with the patients in the conventional treatment group. The proposed empirical drug treatment strategy for patients with persistent dyspepsia results in the performance of fewer diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopies per year with greater effectiveness compared with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy followed by treatment.

Omeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and the therapeutic advantages over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists are well documented. This study assessed 20 mg omeprazole daily (OM20), 10 mg omeprazole daily (OM10), and 150 mg ranitidine (RAN) twice daily for symptom relief in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

METHODS

Patients (n = 994) presenting with heartburn to their general practitioner underwent endoscopy to exclude peptic ulcer disease and were randomized into a UK, multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind comparison of the three treatments for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits after 2 and 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Symptom relief after 4 weeks was achieved by 61% (OM20), 49% (OM10), and 40% (RAN) patients (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0167; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM10 versus RAN, P < 0.01). Among the patients (32%) with erosive reflux oesophagitis, symptom relief was achieved in 79% (OM20), 48% (OM10), and 33% (RAN) (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0001; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM1O versus RAN, NS).

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole, 20 mg, is the most effective initial therapy for relief of GORD symptoms.

A randomized blinded comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of chronic esophageal stricture secondary to acid peptic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal strictures due to gastroesophageal reflux disease are often resistant to medical therapy and require repeated dilation procedures. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of therapy with omeprazole (20 mg/day) to ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) in the treatment of chronic esophageal strictures.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with chronic esophageal stricture disease (mean length of prior treatment, 50.9 months) were entered into a randomized blinded trial. The majority (88%) of the patients had received multiple prior esophageal dilations (mean, 7.9 per patient). Endoscopy and barium esophagograms were performed initially and at the end of 10 months. Symptoms were considered every 2 months and dilations performed as needed. The patient groups were equivalent.

RESULTS

One patient in each group was subsequently lost to follow-up. No significant differences were seen in symptom improvement or need of dilation. At the final endoscopy, 8 of 17 (47%) patients receiving ranitidine had residual erosions or ulceration, compared with 1 of 14 (7%) patients receiving omeprazole (p >0.2). All patients receiving ranitidine had persistent strictures, whereas 8 of 14 (57.1%) patients receiving omeprazole had radiographic and endoscopic resolution of their strictures (p <0.004).

CONCLUSION

These data further emphasize the need for vigorously treating esophagitis in patients with acid peptic strictures.

Comparison of lansoprazole and omeprazole in the short-term management of duodenal ulcers in Taiwan

Lansoprazole is a novel H+/K+-ATPase inhibitor which exhibits a very potent and long-acting suppression of acid secretion. The object of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare duodenal ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment with a once-daily regimen of either 30 mg lansoprazole or 20 mg omeprazole. Of a total of 111 patients 57 received lansoprazole, whereas 54 received omeprazole. In intention-to-treat analysis at 4 weeks, 89.5% patients showed ulcer healing following treatment with lansoprazole compared with 83.3% of patients treated with omeprazole. Per protocol analysis indicated that 96.1% of patients treated with lansoprazole showed ulcer healing, compared with 93.6% of patients treated with omeprazole (NS). Age, smoking or ulcer size did not affect the ulcer healing rate. Both agents could effectively and quickly resolve ulcer symptoms. The Helicobacter pylori clearance was seen in 36 (73.5%) patients in the lansoprazole group and in 40 (80%) patients in the omeprazole group after four weeks of treatment (NS). In addition, both agents led to hypergastrinaemia, by approximately 1.6 fold. Adverse side effects included a few occurrences of reversible skin rash and constipation. It is concluded that lansoprazole elicits an adequate healing response and resolves symptoms of duodenal ulcer as well as omeprazole. Furthermore, lansoprazole is well tolerated with a few adverse side effects.

Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) ranges from episodic symptomatic reflux without oesophagitis to severe oesophageal mucosal damage, such as Barrett's metaplasia or peptic stricture. The multifactorial pathogenesis of GORD prevents medical cure of the disease. GORD is a chronic disease with a high tendency to relapse, requiring a long term treatment strategy in practically all patients. Complete healing of all mucosal lesions is not necessarily the aim of treatment in all patients. In milder forms of reflux disease, symptom relief is the most important goal. Many patients with mild GORD do well on symptomatic self-care with antacids and/or alginate. In addition, lifestyle changes should be advised to all patients: these improve symptoms and enhance the efficacy of therapy. In the acute treatment of GORD the prokinetic drug cisapride has been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms and healing grade I to II oesophagitis. Cisapride decreases symptomatic and endoscopic relapse in patients with mild GORD. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are effective in relieving reflux symptoms in about 50% of patients, but with regard to healing, H2-antagonists appear to be mainly effective in grades I and II and not in higher grades of oesophagitis. Maintenance treatment with H2-antagonists is mainly symptomatically effective in patients with mild GORD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide significantly higher healing rates of reflux oesophagitis than H2-antagonists, even in the more severe cases of oesophagitis and Barrett's ulcers. PPIs are also effective in patients with oesophagitis refractory to treatment with H2-antagonists. PPIs have become the drugs of first choice in healing of all patients with more severe forms of reflux oesophagitis, and increasingly also for patients with milder forms of oesophagitis, certainly those who fail to respond to other drugs. In maintenance treatment of GORD, PPIs are the most effective drugs, offering the possibility of keeping nearly all patients in remission with adjusted doses. Current patient data of up to 5 years indicate the safety of this strategy for this period, but the exact consequences of strong acid inhibition over a longer period still have to be clarified. At present, all but a few patients with GORD can be managed adequately by medical therapy.

A comparison of lansoprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis. Multicentre Investigational Group

BACKGROUND

Lansoprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor which produces prolonged decrease of gastric acidity. The aim of this study was to compare lansoprazole to a standard dose of ranitidine in the treatment of patients with reflux oesophagitis.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-seven patients with erosive oesophagitis were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with either 30 mg lansoprazole once daily or 150 mg ranitidine twice daily.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-two patients were included in the analysis. Lansoprazole (30 mg) daily, healed oesophagitis in 92.1% of patients after 8 weeks of treatment. This was significantly superior to 150 mg ranitidine b.d.s. which healed oesophagitis in 69.9% of patients (P < 0.001). Relief of reflux symptoms was superior with lansoprazole to that with ranitidine. Both lansoprazole and ranitidine were well tolerated with no serious drug-related adverse events noted.

CONCLUSION

Lansoprazole, 30 mg once daily, is highly effective and safe in the short-term treatment of erosive oesophagitis.

A comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in the prevention of recurrence of benign esophageal stricture. Restore Investigator Group

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Dilatation combined with subsequent pharmacological control of gastroesophageal reflux represents a logical but poorly documented approach to the management of benign esophageal stricture. This large trial (366 patients) aimed to assess whether omeprazole as the most effective available medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease prevents recurrent stricture formation.

METHODS

Patients (n = 366) were randomized in a double-blind study to undergo either omeprazole (20 mg once daily; 180 evaluable patients) or ranitidine therapy (150 mg twice daily; 185 evaluable patients) for 1 year after dilatation to 12-18-mm diameter (36-54F gauge). Subsequently, endoscopy and dilatation were performed when clinically indicated and endoscopy on completion. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits every 3 months and using weekly diary cards.

RESULTS

Fewer patients undergoing omeprazole therapy required redilatation compared with those on ranitidine (43 of 143 [30%] vs. 66 of 143 [46%] by 12 months; P < 0.01), and patients in the omeprazole group needed fewer redilatations during the year (0.48 vs. 1.08; P < 0.01). On completion, symptom relief favored omeprazole: 76% of patients in the omeprazole group were free of dysphagia (compared with 64% in the ranitidine group; P < 0.05); 83% were able to accept a normal diet (69%; P < 0.01); and 65% were completely asymptomatic (43%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, was more effective than ranitidine, 150 mg twice daily, as prophylaxis against stricture recurrence and in providing symptom relief.

Long term treatment with omeprazole 20 mg three days a week or 10 mg daily in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare omeprazole 10 mg o.m. (daily) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m. on Friday to Sunday inclusive (weekend) in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse over a 6-month period.

METHODS

After an open healing phase (4 to 8 weeks) with omeprazole 20 mg o.m., 81 patients entered the follow-up phase. Forty-two were randomized in a double-blind double-dummy technique, to omeprazole 10 mg o.m., and 39 to omeprazole 20 mg at weekends. At 3 and 6 months or on symptomatic relapse the patients underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies (quantitative assessment of argyrophilic and gastrin cells), symptom evaluation, and laboratory screening with fasting serum gastrin.

RESULTS

Five patients in the 10 mg group and four in the weekend group were lost to follow-up. The estimated relapse rates over six months in the two groups receiving 10 mg daily or 20 mg at weekends were 19% and 31%, respectively (95% CI of percentage difference: -33% to 8%: intention-to-treat analysis, P = N.S.). During the follow-up phase, symptoms tended to be milder in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group compared to the weekend group. Gastrin levels increased significantly during the healing phase but then stayed almost constant in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and significantly decreased with weekend treatment. The median number of argyrophilic cells showed a slight but statistically significant increase in the omeprazole 10 mg daily group, but did not change in the weekend group. Both the healing and long-term therapies were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not show a clear difference between the two treatment regimens, but there was a tendency towards a lower recurrence rate with omeprazole 10 mg daily compared with 20 mg weekend therapy.

Review article: drug therapy for reflux oesophagitis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder and symptoms can be mild to severe. Management of the disease should be individualized. Life-style changes are important for all patients. Drug therapy is often necessary but only very few patients with severe disease need surgical treatment. The purpose of this article is to focus on drug therapy and to review the clinical trials of all the drugs used for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Thereafter, judged solely on the data derived from these trials, a practical approach to the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is suggested.

Comparison of pantoprazole and ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Pantoprazole-Duodenal Ulcer-Study Group

BACKGROUND

Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole that blocks the H+/K(+)-ATPase in the gastric mucosa and thus inhibits acid secretion.

METHODS

Efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole (40 mg at breakfast) and ranitidine (300 mg at bedtime) in the treatment of uncomplicated acute duodenal ulcer were compared in a double-blind randomized multicentre trial.

RESULTS

Of 202 outpatients who entered the study, 185 terminated the treatment without violation of the protocol. After 2 weeks of treatment, healing rates (protocol correct) with pantoprazole and ranitidine were 81 and 53%, respectively (P < 0.001), the corresponding results after 4 weeks were 97 and 83% (P < 0.01). Pantoprazole was more effective with respect to symptom relief. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole 40 mg at breakfast is superior to ranitidine 300 mg at bedtime in the short-term treatment of acute, uncomplicated duodenal ulcer.

A prospective study of effects of Belsey MK IV antireflux surgery on endoscopic esophagitis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and 24-hr pH measurements. Relation to symptom improvement

A prospective study on the effect of the Belsey MK IV operation on esophagitis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), and acid reflux as monitored on 24-hr pH recording was conducted to investigate the association between objective changes and the effect of operation on reflux-associated symptoms. Thirty-one patients were included. The effect of surgery on symptoms was recorded in all patients, and 22 patients agreed to undergo endoscopy, manometry, and 24-hr pH recording. Follow-up ranged from three to nine years (mean five years); 87% reported long-lasting improvement (50% free of symptoms, 37% major improvement, no medication needed). The combination of symptomatic improvement and absence of esophagitis was found in 70%. LESP significantly increased [8 +/- 6 mm Hg preoperatively, 14 +/- 5 mm Hg postoperatively (P < 0.001)] to a level above 5 mm Hg in 96% of the patients. No endoscopic esophagitis was found in 17 of 20 patients (85%; P < 0.05) (two patients refused endoscopy). The 24-hr pH monitoring normalized in 11 of the 20 patients (55%) (one registration failed). The operation-induced rise in LESP correlated with improvement on endoscopy (r = 0.51; P < 0.002) and with reduction of reflux parameters (number of episodes with pH < 4: r = 0.64; P < 0.05, percentage of total time pH < 4: r = 0.42; P = 0.07). A rise in LESP must be an important aim of antireflux surgery. The Belsey MK IV does not induce a rise to a level that causes severe dysphagia or bloating, but the trade-off is less control of acid reflux.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Appropriate acid suppression for optimal healing of duodenal ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Comparisons of the effectiveness of treatments for healing duodenal ulcer are essential to determine optimal management strategies for both economic analysis and quality-of-life evaluation. Differences are usually made on the basis of the proportion of ulcers healed at varying time intervals. It has been shown by meta-analysis that healing of duodenal ulcers with antisecretory drugs is directly correlated to the degree of acid suppression. More recently, sophisticated meta-analysis of 24-hour intragastric acidity data and clinical trials of antisecretory drugs has demonstrated that the optimal degree and duration of gastric acid suppression for healing duodenal ulcer can be achieved by an aggregate time above pH 3 of 18-20 hours/day. These conditions predict 100% ulcer healing at 4 weeks. Antisecretory drug regimens that approach these criteria should achieve faster healing than other agents, with a concomitant acceleration of symptom resolution. Regression analysis was performed on the healing-time curves for each drug class to determine the rate of ulcer healing per week. The mean proportion of ulcers healed, irrespective of treatment duration, was highest for omeprazole, which also provided a significantly faster rate of duodenal ulcer healing than all other drug classes (p < 0.001). It has recently been shown that healing of erosive oesophagitis with antisecretory drugs is directly correlated with both the duration of acid suppression over the 24-hour period (p < 0.05) and the elevation of intra-oesophageal pH above 4. Furthermore, oesophageal acid exposure time can be normalized by maintaining the intra-oesophageal pH above 4 for at least 96% of the 24-hour period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)