Occult lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with submucosal invasion

Role of radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive and clinically heterogeneous tumor, and better risk stratification of lymph node metastasis (LNM) could lead to personalized treatments. The role of radiomics in the prediction of nodal involvement in GC has not yet been systematically assessed. This study aims to assess the role of radiomics in the prediction of LNM in GC.

Methods

A PubMed/MEDLINE systematic review was conducted to assess the role of radiomics in LNM. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i. original articles, ii. articles on radiomics, and iii. articles on LNM prediction in GC. All articles were selected and analyzed by a multidisciplinary board of two radiation oncologists and one surgeon, under the supervision of one radiation oncologist, one surgeon, and one medical oncologist.

Results

A total of 171 studies were obtained using the search strategy mentioned on PubMed. After the complete selection process, a total of 20 papers were considered eligible for the analysis of the results. Radiomics methods were applied in GC to assess the LNM risk. The number of patients, imaging modalities, type of predictive models, number of radiomics features, TRIPOD classification, and performances of the models were reported.

Conclusions

Radiomics seems to be a promising approach for evaluating the risk of LNM in GC. Further and larger studies are required to evaluate the clinical impact of the inclusion of radiomics in a comprehensive decision support system (DSS) for GC.

DETECTION OF OCCULT LYMPH NODE TUMOR CELLS IN NODE-NEGATIVE GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

The presence of lymph nodes metastasis is one of the most important prognostic indicators in gastric cancer. The micrometastases have been studied as prognostic factor in gastric cancer, which are related to decrease overall survival and increased risk of recurrence. However, their identification is limited by conventional methodology, since they can be overlooked after routine staining.

AIM

To investigate the presence of occult tumor cells using cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3 immunostaining in gastric cancer patients histologically lymph node negative (pN0) by H&E.

METHODS

Forty patients (T1-T4N0) submitted to a potentially curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were evaluated. The results for metastases, micrometastases and isolated tumor cells were also associated to clinicopathological characteristics and their impact on stage grouping. Tumor deposits within lymph nodes were defined according to the tumor-node-metastases guidelines (7th TNM).

RESULTS

A total of 1439 lymph nodes were obtained (~36 per patient). Tumor cells were detected by immunohistochemistry in 24 lymph nodes from 12 patients (30%). Neoplasic cells were detected as a single or cluster tumor cells. Tumor (p=0.002), venous (p=0.016), lymphatic (p=0.006) and perineural invasions (p=0.04), as well as peritumoral lymphocytic response (p=0.012) were correlated to CK-positive immunostaining tumor cells in originally negative lymph nodes by H&E. The histologic stage of two patients was upstaged from stage IB to stage IIA. Four of the 28 CK-negative patients (14.3%) and three among 12 CK-positive patients (25%) had disease recurrence (p=0.65).

CONCLUSION

The CK-immunostaining is an effective method for detecting occult tumor cells in lymph nodes and may be recommended to precisely determine tumor stage. It may be useful as supplement to H&E routine to provide better pathological staging.

Skip lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: is it skipping or skipped?

BACKGROUND

Skip metastasis is the presence of a metastatic lymph node (LN) in an extraperigastric (EP) area without perigastric (PG) involvement. The mechanism and prognosis of skip metastasis are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to scrutinize the clinical significance of skip metastasis in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from 6,025 patients who had undergone gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer. Patients were categorized as a PG-only group when the metastatic LNs were limited to only the PG area, as a PG + EP group if metastatic LNs extended to both the PG area and the EP area, and as a skip group if metastatic LNs were in the EP area but there were no metastatic LNs in the PG area.

RESULTS

After we had performed matching, the prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.54) and was similar to that of the PG + EP group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval 0.92-2.59). The number of retrieved LNs was less in the skip group than in the other groups, especially from the PG area (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the skip group was worse than that of the PG-only group and was similar to that of the PG + EP group when the tumor stage was considered. It is difficult to conclude whether skip metastasis is real skipping of cancer cells or a result of inadequate LN sampling. Further evaluation of LNs in the PG area of the skip group could provide more clues for the mechanism of skip metastasis.

Detection of metastatic lymph nodes using 5-aminolevulinic acid in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Precise diagnosis of lymph node metastases is essential to select therapeutic strategy for patients with gastric cancer, and rapid intraoperative diagnosis is useful for performing less invasive surgery. In this study, we focused on a known photosensitizer, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), and examined the feasibility of 5-ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence to detect metastatic foci in excised lymph nodes of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 144 lymph nodes obtained from 14 gastric cancer patients were examined. The patients were administered 5-ALA orally before surgery. Excised lymph nodes were cut in half and observed by fluorescence microscopy. The diagnostic results were compared to those of the routine histopathological examination.

RESULTS

Observed red fluorescence of PpIX was identical to the metastatic focus, with 84 % accuracy. Twelve non-metastatic lymph nodes showed unexpected PpIX accumulation to lymphoid follicles, but these could be discriminated based on their characteristic fluorescence patterns. With incorporation of this morphological consideration, this method demonstrated good diagnostic power with 92.4 % accuracy. On the quantitative analysis using the signal intensity ratio of red to the sum of red, green, and blue (R/(R + G + B) ratio) as an index corresponding to red fluorescence of PpIX, metastatic lymph nodes showed significantly higher value than non-metastatic lymph nodes (p < 0.0001). The area under the curve was calculated as 0.832 throughout Receiver operating characteristic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that 5-ALA-induced fluorescence diagnosis is a simple and safe method and is a potential candidate for a novel rapid intraoperative diagnostic method applicable to clinical practice.

Lymph node micrometastasis in gastrointestinal tract cancer--a clinical aspect

Lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) can now be detected thanks to the development of various biological methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Although several reports have examined LNM in various carcinomas, including gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, the clinical significance of LNM remains controversial. Clinically, the presence of LNM is particularly important in patients without nodal metastasis on routine histological examination (pN0), because patients with pN0 but with LNM already in fact have metastatic potential. However, at present, several technical obstacles are impeding the detection of LNM using methods such as IHC or RT-PCR. Accurate evaluation should be carried out using the same antibody or primer and the same technique in a large number of patients. The clinical importance of the difference between LNM and isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm in diameter) will also be gradually clarified. It is important that the results of basic studies on LNM are prospectively introduced into the clinical field. Rapid diagnosis of LNM using IHC and RT-PCR during surgery would be clinically useful. Currently, minimally invasive treatments such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic surgery with individualized lymphadenectomy are increasingly being performed. Accurate diagnosis of LNM would clarify issues of curability and safety when performing such treatments. In the near future, individualized lymphadenectomy will develop based on the establishment of rapid, accurate diagnosis of LNM.

Prognostic value of extracapsular invasion and fibrotic focus in single lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Histological findings of metastatic lymph nodes are important prognosticators in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of various pathological characteristics of the early phase of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer, by selecting patients with tumors that had single lymph node metastases, no serosal invasion, and no metastases to the peritoneum, liver, or distant organs.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients were eligible and were entered in this study. These patients were subdivided according to the following histological characteristics of the one metastatic lymph node: size of the metastasis (i.e., amount of tumor cells [AT]), proliferating pattern (PP), intranodal location (IL), and the presence or absence of extracapsular invasion (ECI) and/or fibrotic focus (FF). Associations between clinicopathological factors, survival, and the nodal findings were examined.

RESULTS

There were no correlations between AT or PP and any clinicopathological factors. IL was significantly correlated with venous invasion and the pathological characteristics of the primary tumor. ECI and FF were observed significantly more frequently in pT2 than in pT1 cancer. Overall survival (OS) differed significantly according to depth of invasion, venous invasion, and the presence or absence of ECI or FF, although OS was not affected by AT, PP, or IL. The 10-year overall survival rates of patients with and without ECI were 50% and 80%, respectively, while these rates for patients with and without FF were 50% and 79%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECI and FF were significant prognosticators of survival.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly suggested that the presence of ECI or FF could affect the survival of patients with gastric cancer.

Detection of micrometastases in sentinel node navigation surgery for gastric cancer

Although lymph node metastasis is one of the important prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer, the clinical significance of micrometastasis remains controversial. In the 6th edition of the TMN classification, micrometastases were classified as micrometastasis (MM) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) according to its greatest dimension. The accurate diagnosis of micrometastases is required when considering less invasive surgery, especially in early stage of gastric cancer. Since generating useful information about micrometastases by conventional RT-PCR is time-consuming, this procedure is not useful for rapid diagnosis during surgery. Recently some new methods of genetic diagnosis have reduced the amount of time required to obtain information about micrometastases in lymph nodes to 30-40 min. Such methodology can be clinically applied during less invasive surgery. The sentinel node (SN) concept has recently been applied to gastric cancer and SN navigation surgery (SNNS) is ideal for reduction of lymphadenectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. However, we should think about some conditions to establish SN concept for gastric cancer: the particle size of radioisotope, relationship between metastatic area and RI uptake, and the diagnosis of micrometastases by various method such as histological examination, immunostaining and RT-PCR. Here, we described the current status of MM and ITC in the lymph nodes and the SN concept in gastric cancer.

Morphological distribution of metastatic foci in sentinel lymph nodes with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The TNM classification defines micrometastasis (MM) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) in lymph nodes (LN). Sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery has been introduced in gastrointestinal cancer. Few reports have examined the morphological distribution of MM and ITC of SN in gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of the morphological distribution of cancer cells in SNs according to metastasis (MA), MM, and ITC.

METHODS

All dissected LNs obtained from 160 consecutive patients with mapped SNs arising from cT1-2 N0 tumors were examined. Metastasis in these LNs was examined by histology and cytokeratin staining. The distribution of MA, MM, and ITC was classified as marginal sinus (MS), intermediate sinus (IS), parenchymal (PA), and diffuse types (DF).

RESULTS

Nodal metastases were detected in 65 SNs from 30 patients and MA, MM, and ITC accounted for 53.9%, 21.5%, and 24.6%, respectively. MS, IS, PA, and DF accounted for 57%, 6%, 17%, and 20.0%, respectively. Patients with metastasis of non-MS had more nodal metastasis in non-SNs (P = .025) and had nodal metastasis in second tier (P = .009), compared with the patients with metastasis of MS. The incidence of metastasis in non-MS was higher in tumors larger than 40 mm than those smaller than 40 mm (P = .011).

CONCLUSION

When performing SN navigation surgery in gastric cancer, we should keep in mind that the patients with tumor larger than 40 mm in size and nodal metastasis of non-MS may have non-SN metastasis and nodal metastasis in second tier.

Clinical significance of skip metastasis in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastasis appearing to bypass or skip tiers of lymph nodes (LNs) has been referred to as skip metastasis. The clinical impact of skip metastasis in gastric cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

In patients with gastric cancer, the clinicopathological features and postoperative prognoses of 21 patients with skip metastasis were evaluated and compared with findings in patients with group 1 (N1) or group 2 (N2) LN metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients with skip metastasis, 9 patients had metastasis in the LN along the common hepatic artery (No. 8a), 8 patients had metastasis in the LN along the left gastric artery (No. 7), 2 patients had metastasis in LNs No. 7 and No. 8a, 1 patient had metastasis in the LN at the splenic hilum (No. 10), and 1 patient had metastasis in LN No. 10 and the LN along the splenic artery (No. 11). The mean diameter of the tumors in the patients with skip metastasis was 5.7 +/- 2.4 cm, which was significantly smaller than those in the N1 patients (7.9 +/- 4.1 cm) and N2 patients (9.3 +/- 4.6 cm). The incidence of serosal invasion, lymphatic vessel invasion, and peritoneal metastasis was lower in patients with skip metastasis compared with N2 patients. The 5-year survival rates were 70.2%, 62.0%, and 31.2% in patients with skip metastasis, patients with metastasis in group 1 LNs, and those with metastasis in group 2 LNs, respectively. The prognosis of patients with metastasis in group 2 LNs was significantly worse than that of patients with either skip metastasis (P = 0.0029) or metastasis in group 1 LNs (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that both the clinicopathological characteristics and the prognoses of patients with skip metastasis were similar to those of patients with N1 LN metastasis, but these features were not similar to those in patients with N2 LN metastasis. The sites of skip metastasis presented in the current study may be the key for applying the concept of the sentinel node in gastric cancer.

Sentinel node micrometastases have high proliferative potential in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The 6th edition of the TNM classification has recently defined "sentinel nodes (SN)," "micrometastasis," and "isolated tumor cells (ITC)." The present study examines the frequency and proliferative activity of such metastases with focus on the SNs of gastric cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 133 patients with cT1-2 tumors (cT1: 104, cT2: 29) and mapped SNs. Lymph node metastases were examined by routine histology and by immunohistochemistry with anti-cytokeratin. We used the Ki-67 antibody to detect the primary tumor and lymph node metastases to evaluate proliferative activity.

RESULTS

The number of patients with SNs metastases and metastatic SNs was 19 and 52, respectively. The frequencies of macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and ITC were 48%, 25%, and 27%, respectively. Ki-67 expression in the tumor closely correlated with lymphatic invasion (P = 0.0001), venous invasion (P < 0.0001), and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001). Cells in 96% of macrometastases, 92% of micrometastases, and 29% of ITCs were Ki-67 positive.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that micrometastasis and some ITCs in SNs had proliferative activity. We suggest that micrometastasis and ITCs should be removed, especially during SN navigation surgery, until their clinical significance is clarified.

[Prevalence and importance of nodal micrometastasis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma]

Micrometastasis is a microscopic (less than 2 mm) deposit of malignant cells separated from the primary tumor. The incidence and importance of occult perigastric lymph node involvement were analyzed in 26 pN0 patients using the prospective method. The occult lymph node involvement was detected by immunohistochemical method using the anticytokeratin 8/18 antibody. Prevalence of clinically significant occult lymph node involvement (Mi+) was statistically significant, and found in 38.5% of pN0 patients. Out of tumor characteristics analyzed as possible predictors of occult lymph node involvement, the histological grade (GH) and the involvement of lymphatic vessels within gastric wall (pL1) had significant effect on the respective evaluation. The patients with histological grade 3 and 4 had occult lymph node involvement more often than those with grade 1 and 2 (p<0.05). More than 60% of pL1 patients had occult lymph node involvement LN (Mi+). Due to high prevalence of micrometastatic lymph node involvement, detection with specific immunohistochemical or molecular biology techniques should be a part of routine specimen examination in patients with pN0 gastric cancer.

Body mass index does not affect systematic D2 lymph node dissection and postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The extent of standard lymph node dissection (D1, D2, or D3) in gastric cancer patients is still controversial. Several prospective European trials attained contradictory results. A generally increased body mass index (BMI) of the European patients was assumed to be one of the major causes for postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

We evaluated the effect of BMI on the quality of routine D2 lymph node dissection and on postoperative morbidity in patients with gastric cancer who underwent a potentially curative total gastrectomy. A total of 199 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent a total gastrectomy and a routine D2 lymph node dissection between 1992 and 2001 were included in the study. According to BMI, they were assigned to three groups: group A, with BMI <25 kg/m(2) (normal body weight); group B, with BMI of 25 to 30 kg/m(2) (overweight); and group C, with BMI >30 kg/m(2) (obesity). Parameters such as complete histopathological staging, intraoperative blood loss, length of operation, and surgical and nonsurgical morbidity were recorded and correlated within the different groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found with regard to the number of examined lymph nodes, blood loss, length of operation, surgical complications, or length of stay in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to comparable Japanese studies, our analysis reveals that even for overweight patients, a standard D2 lymph node dissection is justified without significantly increased morbidity.

Clinicopathological analysis of early gastric cancer with solitary lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

The sentinel node concept has not yet been established in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with early gastric cancer who had only one lymph node metastasis were regarded retrospectively as patients with a possible sentinel node metastasis, and the morphological features of these nodes were assessed. The level I nodes in seven patients with a possible skip metastasis at routine haematoxylin and eosin staining were re-examined using cytokeratin (CK) immunostaining.

RESULTS

The shape of the gastric cancer lesion could be examined in 53 of the patients; more than one-third (20 of 53) were microfocal type. Concerning the intranodal cancer foci, the marginal sinus type was found in 32 affected nodes, medullary sinus type in 14 and mixed type in seven. Forty-three per cent of suspected sentinel nodes were the largest in size among all nodes from the station. CK immunostaining of seven non-metastatic nodes with haematoxylin and eosin revealed that three were CK positive.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that possible sentinel nodes detected by conventional means may not always be primary portions of any metastasis. Adoption of sentinel node biopsy in gastric cancer must await the development of improved procedures for diagnosis during surgery.

Prognostic effect of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with histologically node-negative gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus as to the impact of lymph node micrometastasis on survival of patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic significance of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with histologically node-negative gastric cancer.

METHODS

Lymph nodes (n = 2039) from 64 patients with histologically node-negative gastric cancer (T2, T3) were evaluated for micrometastasis. Three serial 5- micro m sections of the resected lymph nodes were prepared for immunohistochemical staining with the anti-cytokeratin antibody CAM 5.2.

RESULTS

Micrometastasis was found in 73 of 2039 nodes (4%) and 20 of 64 patients (32%). The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower for patients with lymph node micrometastasis than for those without lymph node micrometastasis (66% vs. 95%, P <.01). The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower when there were four or more positive micrometastatic nodes (94% vs. 29%, P <.01) and when there were extragastric micrometastatic nodes (89% vs. 53%, P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node micrometastasis was associated with poor outcome in patients with histologically node-negative gastric cancer. The number and the level of lymph node micrometastases are useful prognostic markers for deciding treatment strategies for additional therapy and follow-up.

Minimal residual disease in gastrointestinal cancer

Tumor progression after curative resection of gastrointestinal carcinomas is probably caused by pre- or intraoperative tumor cell dissemination. Disseminated tumor cells are generally detected by immunohistochemistry- or PCR-based molecular-biology methods. A consensus on which is the most adequate detection method has not yet been found, which makes the comparison of data difficult. The prognostic relevance of disseminated cells has been shown, at least in part, for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colonic cancer. The data regarding hepatocellular cancer is conflicting. This article gives a critical review of tumor cell detection in gastrointestinal cancer.

Gastric cancer: which patients benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy?

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of systematic lymphadenectomy (SLA) in curative resected gastric cancer patients with respect to long-term survival, peri-operative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively gathered database of 309 resected gastric cancer patients and analysed the outcome of 185 R0-resected patients (60%) with respect to peri-operative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival by comparing 81 patients resected with SLA (D2-group) versus 104 patients resected without SLA (D1-group).

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival rates of R0-resected patients (n = 173; exclusion of peri-operative mortality) amounted to 49% and did not differ significantly between D2- and D1-groups (53% vs 47%); P=0.344). Nevertheless, subgroups of patients taking a benefit from SLA could be defined. Gastric cancer patients without LN metastases (pTx pN0; n=78) and patients with LN metastases only in perigastric lymph nodes (pTx pN1; n=34) showed a significantly better long-term prognosis when SLA was performed (84% vs 51%; P=0.001). Regarding peri-operative morbidity (38% vs 39%) and mortality (6% in each case) we could not find any differences between the D2- and D1-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that SLA is able to improve long-term survival for some tumour stages. Therefore SLA should be recommended as a standard procedure in all gastric cancer patients resected with curative intention.

New therapeutic strategy for gastric carcinoma: a two-step evaluation of malignant potential from its molecular biologic and pathologic characteristics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A previous study of ours indicated that platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A) mRNA expression in biopsy specimens can identify a subgroup of high-risk gastric carcinoma patients, while clinicopathologic studies have shown that lymph node involvement is an important risk factor for predicting overall survival. To identify gastric carcinoma patients at high risk for recurrence, we assessed a two-step evaluation consisting of mRNA expression of tumor growth-related factors and the histopathologic findings.

METHODS

The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to assay the gene expression of PDGF-A and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) in 69 gastric carcinoma endoscopic biopsy specimens (prospective cohort). The corresponding gastric carcinoma surgical specimens were classified histologically. Finally, the patients' survival curves were calculated. The relationships among the mRNA expression, histopathologic findings, and survival period were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Nodal involvement correlated with PDGF-A and TGF-beta1 mRNA expression in early and advanced carcinomas, respectively. Both PDGF-A mRNA and TGF-beta1 mRNA expression were independent preoperative prognostic indicators in advanced cases. The ratio of involved nodes (n1) to total perigastric lymph nodes dissected (percentage of involved nodes) was the most independent postoperative prognostic indicator in advanced cases. Early carcinomas were divided preoperatively into two types. Advanced carcinomas were divided preoperatively into three. These were divided again postoperatively according to the percentage of involved nodes into high- and low-malignacy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-step evaluation of the malignant potential of gastric carcinoma by a combination of preoperative evaluation for PDGF-A and TGF-beta1 expression and postoperative pathologic examination would yield a more accurate prognosis for patients with gastric carcinoma.

Lymphatic routes of the stomach demonstrated by gastric carcinomas with solitary lymph node metastasis

To clarify whether or not the lymphatic routes that have long been generally accepted are indeed correct, we retrospectively examined the clinical records of patients with solitary lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. From 735 patients gastrectomized with lymph node dissection (more than D1), 51 (7%) were histologically proven to have only one lymph node involved. In 44 of these 51 patients, the involved nodes were all in the perigastric region (N1). There were also 7 patients with a jumping metastasis to the N2-N3 nodes. Three of them were found along the left gastric artery (#7 according to Japanese classification) and the other 4 were found along either the common hepatic artery (#8) or the proper hepatic artery (#12). The depth of invasion was submucosal in 2, proper-muscular in 2, subserosal in 1, and serosa-exposed in 2, and the conclusive stage was II in 2, IIIa in 3, and IIIb in 2. However, 1 of these patients died of liver cirrhosis and 2 died of pneumonia, while the other 4 were still alive at the time of this report more than 5 years after surgery. These results suggest that not every sentinel node is located in the perigastric region near the primary tumor and that, if the preoperative examination indicates submucosal invasion, then a systematic regional lymph node dissection should therefore be carried out.