Clinical development of a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine

Living with HIV and Getting Vaccinated: A Narrative Review

After 40 years of its appearance, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a leading public health challenge worldwide. Since the introduction of antiretroviral treatment (ART), HIV infection has become a chronic condition, and people living with HIV could have life expectancies close to those of the general population. People with HIV often have an increased risk of infection or experience more severe morbidity following exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases. Nowadays, several vaccines are available against bacteria and viruses. However, national and international vaccination guidelines for people with HIV are heterogeneous, and not every vaccine is included. For these reasons, we aimed to perform a narrative review about the vaccinations available for adults living with HIV, reporting the most updated studies performed for each vaccine among this population. We performed a comprehensive literature search through electronic databases (Pubmed-MEDLINE and Embase) and search engines (Google Scholar). We included English peer-reviewed publications (articles and reviews) on HIV and vaccination. Despite widespread use and guideline recommendations, few vaccine trials have been conducted in people with HIV. In addition, not all vaccines are recommended for people with HIV, especially for those with low CD4 cells count. Clinicians should carefully collect the history of vaccinations and patients' acceptance and preferences and regularly check the presence of antibodies for vaccine-preventable pathogens.

Biosensing strategies for the electrochemical detection of viruses and viral diseases - A review

Viruses are the causing agents for many relevant diseases, including influenza, Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and COVID-19. Its rapid replication and high transmissibility can lead to serious consequences not only to the individual but also to collective health, causing deep economic impacts. In this scenario, diagnosis tools are of significant importance, allowing the rapid, precise, and low-cost testing of a substantial number of individuals. Currently, PCR-based techniques are the gold standard for the diagnosis of viral diseases. Although these allow the diagnosis of different illnesses with high precision, they still present significant drawbacks. Their main disadvantages include long periods for obtaining results and the need for specialized professionals and equipment, requiring the tests to be performed in research centers. In this scenario, biosensors have been presented as promising alternatives for the rapid, precise, low-cost, and on-site diagnosis of viral diseases. This critical review article describes the advancements achieved in the last five years regarding electrochemical biosensors for the diagnosis of viral infections. First, genosensors and aptasensors for the detection of virus and the diagnosis of viral diseases are presented in detail regarding probe immobilization approaches, detection methods (label-free and sandwich), and amplification strategies. Following, immunosensors are highlighted, including many different construction strategies such as label-free, sandwich, competitive, and lateral-flow assays. Then, biosensors for the detection of viral-diseases-related biomarkers are presented and discussed, as well as point of care systems and their advantages when compared to traditional techniques. Last, the difficulties of commercializing electrochemical devices are critically discussed in conjunction with future trends such as lab-on-a-chip and flexible sensors.

Hepatitis A vaccination

Hepatitis A is an important public health issue worldwide. Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) was first licensed in 1992. Both inactivated HepA (HepA-I) and live attenuated HepA (HepA-L) are highly immunogenic and well tolerated, and immune protection postvaccination can persist for at least 20 y. HepA is effective for both preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis, especially among children and young adults. The strategy of HepA vaccination varies in different countries and mainly includes vaccination among high-risk populations, regional childhood vaccination and universal childhood vaccination. The incidence of hepatitis A has decreased greatly in many countries in the last 30 y, but hepatitis A outbreaks frequently occur among high-risk populations and those who have not been covered by universal child vaccination programs in recent years. Disease surveillance and serosurveys are suggested to clarify the shift in the epidemiology of hepatitis A. The long-term persistence of immune protection after one dose of HepA should be further studied, as well as the cost-effective evaluation of different strategies of HepA vaccination. Based on this evidence, the recommendation on HepA vaccination should be put forward scientifically and updated in a timely and well-implemented manner.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

This review is withdrawn because it is outdated. A new review is to be published by the end of 2019.

Inactivated Viral Vaccines

Inactivated vaccines have been used for over a century to induce protection against viral pathogens. This established approach of vaccine production is relatively straightforward to achieve and there is an augmented safety profile as compared to their live counterparts. Today, there are six viral pathogens for which licensed inactivated vaccines are available with many more in development. Here, we describe the principles of viral inactivation and the application of these principles to vaccine development. Specifically emphasized are the manufacturing procedure and the accompanying assays, of which assays used for monitoring the inactivation process and preservation of neutralizing epitopes, are pivotal. Novel inactivated vaccines in development and the hurdles they face for licensure are also discussed as well as the (dis)advantages of inactivation over the other vaccine production methodologies.

Live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines developed in China

Two live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccines, H 2 and LA-1 virus strains, were developed through serial passages of the viruses in cell cultures at 32 °C and 35 °C respectively. Both vaccines were safe and immunogenic, providing protection against clinical hepatitis A in 95% of the vaccinees, with a single dose by subcutaneous injection. The vaccine recipients were not protected from asymptomatic, subclinical hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, which induced a similar antibody response as for unvaccinated subjects. A second dose caused anamnestic response and can be used for boosting. Oral immunization of human with H 2 vaccine or of marmoset with LA-1 vaccine failed, and no evidence was found for person-to-person transmission of the H 2 strain or for marmoset-to-marmoset transmission of LA-1 strain, by close contact. H 2 strain was genetically stable when passaged in marmosets, humans or cell cultures at 37 °C; 3 consecutive passages of the virus in marmosets did not cause virulence mutation. The live vaccines offer the benefits of low cost, single dose injection, long- term protection, and increased duration of immunity through subclinical infection. Improved sanitation and administration of 150 million doses of the live vaccines to children had led to a 90% reduction in the annual national incidence rate of hepatitis A in China during the 16-year period, from 1991 to 2006. Hepatitis A immunization with both live and inactivated HA vaccines was implemented in the national routine childhood immunization program in 2008 and around 92% of the 16 million annual births received the affordable live, attenuated vaccines at 18 months of age. Near elimination of the disease was achieved in China for 14 years following introduction of the H 2 live vaccine into the Expanded Immunization Program (EPI) in 1992.

An open, prospective, randomized study comparing the immunogenicity and safety of two inactivated hepatitis A pediatric vaccines in toddlers, children and adolescents in China

BACKGROUND

Vaccines against hepatitis A provide long-lasting protection in both adults and children. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine AVAXIM 80U Pediatric is safe and not inferior in terms of seroprotection rate to HAVRIX 720 vaccine 1 month after booster vaccination.

METHODS

An open, randomized, single-center trial was conducted in China in healthy antihepatitis A virus seronegative individuals from 12 months to 15 years of age. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either AVAXIM 80U Pediatric or HAVRIX 720, followed by a booster vaccination, using the same vaccine 6 months afterward.

RESULTS

A total of 720 individuals were included in the study, 480 in the AVAXIM 80U Pediatric group and 240 in the HAVRIX 720 group, and 686 individuals completed the full vaccination schedule. AVAXIM 80U Pediatric was statistically noninferior to HAVRIX 720 in terms of seroprotection rate for all individuals and in each of 3 age groups: toddlers (12-23 months), children (2-11 years) and adolescents (12-15 years). Antihepatitis A virus geometric mean titers were significantly higher with AVAXIM 80U Pediatric than with HAVRIX 720. Both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines were well-tolerated and had a similar incidence and type of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

AVAXIM 80U Pediatric is safe and immunogenic, with a seroprotection rate that is not inferior to HAVRIX 720 in a pediatric population of healthy individuals.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical protective efficacy, sero-protective efficacy, and safety and harms of hepatitis A vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to November 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing HAV vaccine with placebo, no intervention, or appropriate control vaccines in participants of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two authors and verified by a third author. Where required, authors contacted investigators to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically apparent hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis). The secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protective anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG), and number and types of adverse events. Results were presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis. We conducted assessment of risk of bias to evaluate the risk of systematic errors (bias) and trial sequential analyses to estimate the risk of random errors (the play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 11 clinical studies, of which only three were considered to have low risk of bias; two were quasi-randomised studies in which we only addressed harms. Nine randomised trials with 732,380 participants addressed the primary outcome of clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Of these, four trials assessed the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (41,690 participants) and five trials assessed the live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (690,690 participants). In the three randomised trials with low risk of bias (all assessing inactivated vaccine), clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 9/20,684 (0.04%) versus 92/20,746 (0.44%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30). In all nine randomised trials, clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 31/375,726 (0.01%) versus 505/356,654 (0.18%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17). These results were supported by trial sequential analyses. Subgroup analyses confirmed the clinical effectiveness of both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30) and live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) on clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines had a significant effect on reducing the lack of sero-protection (less than 20 mIU/L) (RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03). No trial reported on a sero-protective threshold less than 10 mIU/L. The risk of both non-serious local and systemic adverse events was comparable to placebo for the inactivated HAV vaccines. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on adverse events for the live attenuated HAV vaccine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccines are effective for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis A in susceptible individuals. This review demonstrated significant protection for at least two years with the inactivated HAV vaccine and at least five years with the live attenuated HAV vaccine. There was evidence to support the safety of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. More high quality evidence is required to determine the safety of live attenuated vaccines.

Hepatitis A vaccination of Argentinean infants: comparison of two vaccination schedules

BACKGROUND

Early immunization to protect infants against hepatitis A (HA) is recommended in intermediate or high endemic areas of the world, but little is known of the effects of maternal antibodies on the immune response. We studied the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of an inactivated HA vaccine administered in two different schedules to 2-month-old infants in an intermediate/high endemic area in Argentina.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized study 131 infants received either three doses (at 2, 4, 6 months of age [Group A]) or one dose (at 6 months of age [Group B]) of the pediatric inactivated HA vaccine, Avaxim 80, and a booster dose at 15-18 months. HAV antibodies were measured (ELISA) at 2, 7, 15-18 and 16-19 months of age. Immediate (30 min after injection) and solicited local and systemic reactions were recorded for 7 days after each injection.

RESULTS

Of 107/131 subjects (81.6%) who completed the study and who provided final serum samples after booster dose, 94 (87.8%) were seropositive at enrolment (>20 mIU/mL) with geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of 2989 and 3637 mIU/mL in Groups A and B, respectively. One month post-booster GMCs were 8236 mIU/ml (95% CI; 6304, 10760) and 1687 mIU/ml (1148, 2479) in Groups A and B, respectively, with 100% seroprotection.

CONCLUSIONS

The HA vaccine was well tolerated and induced immunological priming in both groups during the first year of life in spite of the presence of maternal antibodies. Post-booster GMCs achieved after one or three primary doses suggest a long-term protection against HA.

Prevention of hepatitis A by Havrix: a review

Hepatitis A is one of the most common vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in the world. With at least 1.5 million cases of hepatitis A worldwide each year, disease management constitutes a substantial economic burden. The first effective vaccine against hepatitis A, Havrix was introduced in 1992. This review summarizes data accumulated following more than a decade of clinical experience with this vaccine and compares clinical data with other currently available hepatitis A vaccines. Based on this data and on the current immunological knowledge, a recent consensus concluded that hepatitis A vaccines induce lifelong protection, and thus booster vaccinations against hepatitis A are unnecessary in fully immunized, healthy people. In view of this, current regulatory recommendations for the use of hepatitis A vaccines are reviewed and possible future strategies identified.

Interchangeability of Hepatitis A boosters, Avaxim® and Vaqta®, in healthy adults following a primary dose of the combined typhoid/Hepatitis A vaccine Viatim®

This study investigated the suitability of Avaxim and Vaqta as Hepatitis A booster vaccines 6 months after priming with the combined Hepatitis A/typhoid vaccine, Viatim. One hundred and twenty adults were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. Group A (reference group) received Avaxim then Avaxim (n = 40), Group B received Viatim then Avaxim (n = 41) and Group C received Viatim then Vaqta (n = 39). One month after booster vaccination, anti-Hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) antibodies geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of subjects primed with Viatim were non-inferior to the group primed and boosted with the monovalent Hepatitis A vaccine Avaxim. Anti-Salmonella typhi capsular polysaccharide virulence antigen (anti-Vi) GMCs in groups primed with Viatim were protective and all vaccines were well-tolerated. Therefore, Viatim may be used as a primary HAV vaccine with either Avaxim or Vaqta as Hepatitis A boosters and it will provide the same protection as two doses of Avaxim.

Immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A pediatric vaccine: three-year post-booster follow-up

The persistence of anti-hepatitis A virus antibody concentrations was followed over 3 years in 177 healthy children following primary and booster vaccination with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim 80 pediatric. Seroconversion rates (post-immunization anti-HAV antibody concentration >or=20 mIU/mL) and geometric mean concentrations (GMC) were estimated for each of three age groups: 18 month--3 years, 4--8 years, and 9--15 years. Only subjects who were initially HAV-seronegative at inclusion (<20 mIU/mL) were analyzed. Follow-up visits at years 1, 2, and 3 involved 177, 149, and 135 children, respectively. A decline in GMCs of about 74% occurred during the first year, from 3,060 to 814 mIU/mL overall, but did not continue during years 2 and 3. All subjects remained seropositive (antibody concentration >or=20 mIU/mL), with overall GMCs of 814, 891, and 924 mIU/mL in years 1--3, respectively. The inactivated hepatitis A study-vaccine resulted in sustained seroprotective antibody concentrations in 100% of these children, without a significant decline in antibiotic concentrations over the 3 years following booster injection, thus demonstrating the long-term protection expected with this vaccine.

Experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines

The lengthy history of efforts to understand the pathogenesis and means of preventing and controlling both hepatitis A and B is noteworthy for many exceptional scientific achievements. Among these are the development of vaccines to prevent the spread of infection through induction of active immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The first plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1981 and was replaced by recombinant hepatitis B vaccines in 1986 and 1989. Vaccines to prevent HAV infection were licensed in the United States in 1995 and 1996. Subsequently, combination vaccines that included both hepatitis A and B vaccine components, or the hepatitis B component in combination with other commonly administered vaccines, were licensed in the United States. Despite significant reductions in hepatitis-related morbidity and mortality that have resulted from widespread use of these vaccines, vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality still occur. The purposes of this article are to review clinical trial and other experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines in healthy individuals as well as in those with chronic liver disease, infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, or requiring hemodialysis; describe the impact that these vaccines and national recommendations for vaccination have had on reducing the incidence of HAV and HBV infection; and recommend expansion of these recommendations to include universal vaccination of adults as a means of further reducing the burden of viral hepatitis.

Hepatitis A and B Booster Recommendations: Implications for Travelers

Hepatitis A and B are serious vaccine-preventable diseases with a predominantly overlapping epidemiological distribution. Travelers, a term encompassing a range of individuals, are at risk of contracting these diseases if they are unvaccinated. Although the benefits of the primary vaccination course of hepatitis A and B vaccines are clear, the administration of hepatitis A and B boosters varies worldwide. Recommendations on the need for booster vaccinations have recently been published, and the implications of these recommendations for travelers are discussed in this review. Until a greater understanding is reached on the immunogenicity of hepatitis A and B vaccines in certain special groups (e.g., immunocompromised persons), there will be a need to monitor antibody levels to assess whether booster vaccinations are required. However, for the majority of immunocompetent travelers, the full primary vaccination course will provide protection from both hepatitis A and B infection in the long term, without the need for boosters.

Vaccination options for last-minute travellers in need of travel-related prophylaxis against hepatitis A and B and typhoid fever: a practical guide

Last-minute travellers represent a particular challenge to travel healthcare professionals, as standard vaccination schedules can take a few months to complete. This has led researchers to investigate the value of alternative accelerated schedules and existing schedules among this group, particularly with respect to time taken for an individual to seroconvert, duration of protection and multiple vaccination requirements. This paper reviews the available options for the three most common vaccine preventable diseases among travellers-hepatitis A, hepatitis B and typhoid fever. Studies suggest that even if the first dose of hepatitis A vaccine is given on the day of travel, this will provide adequate protection, and that immunity to typhoid fever can be provided in over 70% of travellers following vaccination 1 week prior to departure. For hepatitis B, an accelerated schedule of 0, 7 and 21-days has been shown to induce early protection, and is considered to be of benefit to the last-minute traveller. Practical guidelines on vaccination options from one week up to one month, as well as one month or more prior to travel are presented. This should provide guidance for travel healthcare professionals, and reassure last-minute travellers that they need not begin their journey unprotected against these three serious infectious diseases.

Immunological priming of one dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine given during the first year of life in presence of maternal antibodies

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis A virus (HAV)-seronegative infants, inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are highly immunogenic. On the contrary, in infants who are HAV-seropositive before vaccination, the interfering effect of passively-transferred maternal anti-HAV antibodies leads to lower post-primary immunization anti-HAV levels, as compared to those achieved by seronegative infants. One possible way to overcome this drawback is to delay hepatitis A vaccination later during the first year of life. The objective of the study was to document the immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in 6 months old HAV-seropositive infants, given as two dose regimen consisting of a single primary immunization at 6 months of age, followed by a booster dose 6 months later.

METHODS

The immunogenicity of one hepatitis A vaccine (Avaxim pediatric, Aventis Pasteur) was documented in 108 6 months old, HAV-seropositive infants randomly assigned to receive one priming dose of hepatitis A vaccine either concomitantly with (Group 2) or 2 weeks after the third dose of routine diphteria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis reconstituting lyophilized tetanus conjugated Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwcP//PRP approximately T) vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) (Group 1). A booster dose was given 6 months later, concomitantly with MMR vaccine.

RESULTS

The 91 infants who were HAV-seropositive (ELISA titer >20 mIU/ml) at the moment of primo vaccination remained seropositive 1 month later. Geometric mean titers (GMT) decreased from 292 and 278 mIU/ml 1 month after the first dose, to 77.6 and 76.0 mIU/ml 6 months after, in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Post-booster titers increased markedly in both groups, with GMTs of 1731 and 1866 mIU/ml and geometric mean post/pre-immunization titer ratios of 22.3 and 24.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that immunological priming induced by a single dose of Avaxim pediatric administered to 6 or 6.5 months old, HAV-seropositive infants is present and should not preclude the use of this vaccine in such populations.

Hepatitis A vaccine

Hepatitis A is an infectious disease frequently reported in the United States. An average of 26,000 cases were reported each year during 1980 to 1999; probably 3 times as many occurred. Hepatitis A vaccines provide a powerful new prevention tool. The 2 inactivated hepatitis A vaccines available as pediatric and adult formulations in the United States and in many other countries are safe, immunogenic, and efficacious. A single dose provides excellent short-term protection; the second dose is thought to be important for long-term protection. Because hepatitis A virus (HAV) is excreted in high concentrations in the stool, the principal mode of transmission is person-to-person by the fecal-oral route, most commonly among household and sexual contacts of people with HAV infection. Children can be important in transmission because they frequently have unrecognized or asymptomatic infection. Implementation of recommendations for routine hepatitis A vaccination of children living in areas with consistently elevated hepatitis A rates appears to be resulting in dramatic declines in the overall incidence of the disease. Improved vaccination coverage and continued monitoring of incidence rates are needed to determine the overall long-term impact of this strategy.

A randomised comparison of two inactivated hepatitis A vaccines, Avaxim and Vaqta, given as a booster to subjects primed with Avaxim

To investigate whether Vaqta may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim, 127 adults primed 6 months previously with Avaxim were randomised to receive either Vaqta or Avaxim as a booster. Prior to the booster all subjects were seropositive. Geometric mean antibody titres increased from 496 to 7262 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Vaqta as a booster and from 325 to 5131 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Avaxim as a booster. Both vaccines were well tolerated; 20.3% of subjects receiving Vaqta experienced a local reaction, compared to 39.7% of those receiving Avaxim. Systemic reactions were reported by 15.6% of those receiving Vaqta and 14.3% of those receiving Avaxim. Vaqta may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim.

Safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in Argentinean children

BACKGROUND

Children are a reservoir of hepatitis A virus and must be considered as primary targets of any immunization strategy. The safety and immunogenicity were evaluated for a new formulation of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim 80 units, containing one-half the antigen dose of the adult formulation.

METHODS

The safety of two doses of this vaccine given 6 months apart was evaluated in an open study in 537 Argentinean children 12 months to 15 years old. Immunogenicity was evaluated at Weeks 0, 2, 24 and 27 in a subgroup of 120 subjects.

RESULTS

Two weeks after the first vaccine dose, >99% of initially seronegative children had seroconverted (titers > or =20 mIU/ml), with a geometric mean titer of 98.5 mIU/ml. Before booster at 24 weeks all subjects had seroconverted. A strong anamnestic response was observed after the second dose at which time the geometric mean titer had increased >35-fold, and antibody titers were consistent with long term protection. Immediate adverse reactions were observed in 3 of 537 (0.6%) subjects after the first dose. Local reactions were mild and transient and did not increase with subsequent doses. Among the systemic events reported during the 7-day follow-up period, 37 cases of fever after the first dose and 22 cases after the second dose were reported. Only 3 cases of fever were clearly related to vaccination (< or =38.2 degrees C) after the first injection, all of which subsided in less than 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of hepatitis A vaccine in children ages 12 months to 15 years in healthy children ages 12 to 47 months.

Safety, immunogenicity and antibody persistence of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in 4 to 15 year old children

Among 277 healthy Venezuelan children, aged between 4 and 15 years, who were screened for hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies, 118 seronegative children were enrolled in an open study. Each child received one dose of the Pasteur Mérieux Connaught inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (AVAXIM¿trade mark omitted¿, 160 antigen units), followed by a booster dose 24 weeks later. All seronegative subjects seroconverted 2 weeks after immunisation (antibody titres greater, similar20 mIU/ml), and antibody titres were still over greater, similar20 mIU/ml after 24 weeks, at the moment of the booster dose. The anti-HAV antibody geometric mean titre (GMT), as measured by a modified radio-immunoassay (HAVAB(R), Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA), was 73.7 mIU/ml, 2 weeks after the first dose. Four weeks after the booster, the GMT value reached 6999 mIU/ml, representing a 29.6-fold rise from pre-booster levels. One year after the booster dose, the GMT value was 1673 mIU/ml in the 92 subjects who provided blood samples at this time, all of whom were still seroconverted ( greater, similar20 mIU/ml). No serious adverse event related to the vaccination occurred during the study. No immediate systemic reaction occurred. Local reactions were reported by 9.3% of subjects who received the primary injection and 5.5% of those given the booster dose. The systemic reactions were mainly fever and myalgia reported over the 7 days following the injection by 3.4% of subjects after the first dose and 5.5% of subjects after the booster dose. A clinically significant elevation of serum transaminase from pre-immunisation levels was noted in one subject (AST level 2.2 times the upper normal limit) 2 weeks after the first injection, although this was not associated with any clinical signs of impaired liver function. This trial demonstrated that AVAXIM¿trade mark omitted¿ containing 160 antigen units is safe and highly immunogenic in healthy children aged between 4 and 15 years, and could be included in the childhood vaccination schedule to control infection in areas endemic for hepatitis A.

Comparison of two immunization schedules with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (AvaximTM)

BACKGROUND

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are licensed with a vaccination schedule based on two injections of vaccine given at least 6 months apart.

METHODS

Two vaccination schedules for the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, AvaximTM (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France), were compared in a monocentric, randomized, open trial. Two doses of the vaccine were given at intervals of either 6 months (0-6 month group) or 12 months (0-12 month group) to 96 adult volunteers. Anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody titers were determined in a blind fashion using the modified RIA (mRIA) HAVABtrade mark assay. After excluding subjects with positive preimmunization anti-HAV titers and those with protocol deviations, both groups were still comparable by sex ratio and mean age.

RESULTS

Four weeks (28 6 4 days) after the first dose, the seroconversion (SC) rate of initially HAV-seronegative subjects (antibody titer < 20 mIU/mL) was 100% in the 0-6 month group and 96. 9% in the 0-12 month group, with corresponding geometric mean titer (GMT) values (95% CI) of 369 mIU/mL (274-497 mIU/mL) and 445 mIU/mL (292-679 mIU/mL), respectively. After 6 months, SC was obtained in all subjects, and the corresponding GMT values were 349 mIU/mL and 359 mIU/mL in the 0-6 month group and the 0-12 month group, respectively. Four weeks after the booster dose given at 6 months, a 14.5-fold rise in GMT was observed. In the 0-12 month group, anti-HAV GMT values decreased by only 20% from 6 months to 12 months with a pre-booster GMT value of 286 mIU/mL at the 12-month evaluation. Four weeks after the booster given at 12 months, a 22. 5-fold rise in GMT was observed. Statistical analysis showed that the two vaccination schedules were comparable in their ability to boost antibody titers. Unsolicited reactions to vaccination were not different to those reported during earlier trials. Less than 12% of the vaccinees reported reactions after the first dose (11/93), or after the booster dose (11/92).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrated antibody persistence is excellent for at least 12 months after one dose of this vaccine, and that a booster may be given at any time between 6 and 12 months after primary immunization.

-Vaccination against hepatitis A-

A pediatric form of hepatitis A vaccine is available with an immunization schedule of three injections within one year followed by booster injections every 10 years. This schedule gives a marked elevation of protecting antibodies and has a good protective effect against the symptomatic forms of hepatitis A. The vaccine is administered intramuscularly in the deltoid and is usually well tolerated. Major changes have occurred in the epidemiology of hepatitis A in France in the last decades. While many children were affected 20 years ago, hepatitis A is nowadays essentially observed in adolescents and young adults, although there remain symptomatic cases, with very few fulminating cases, among children. Considering the low risk of symptomatic cases, the usefulness of a systematic immunization against hepatitis A in children is questionable, with the exception of polytransfused children and handicapped children living in community. For the travelling children, hepatitis A immunization must be decided according to the travel conditions and the epidemiology of hepatitis A in the visited country.