The Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS). Implementation of a register of the disease on a nationwide basis. Italian GBS Study Group

Guillain-Barré Syndrome and COVID-19: a one-year observational multicenter study

Background and purpose

Many single cases and small series of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection were reported during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) outbreak worldwide. However, the debate regarding the possible role of infection in causing GBS is still ongoing. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate epidemiological and clinical findings of GBS diagnosed during the COVID‐19 pandemic in northeastern Italy in order to further investigate the possible association between GBS and COVID‐19.

Methods

Guillain–Barré syndrome cases diagnosed in 14 referral hospitals from northern Italy between March 2020 and March 2021 were collected and divided into COVID‐19‐positive and COVID‐19‐negative. As a control population, GBS patients diagnosed in the same hospitals from January 2019 to February 2020 were considered.

Results

The estimated incidence of GBS in 2020 was 1.41 cases per 100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval 1.18–1.68) versus 0.89 cases per 100,000 persons/year (95% confidence interval 0.71–1.11) in 2019. The cumulative incidence of GBS increased by 59% in the period March 2020–March 2021 and, most importantly, COVID‐19‐positive GBS patients represented about 50% of the total GBS cases with most of them occurring during the two first pandemic waves in spring and autumn 2020. COVID‐19‐negative GBS cases from March 2020 to March 2021 declined by 22% compared to February 2019–February 2020.

Conclusions

Other than showing an increase of GBS in northern Italy in the “COVID‐19 era” compared to the previous year, this study emphasizes how GBS cases related to COVID‐19 represent a significant part of the total, thus suggesting a relation between COVID‐19 and GBS.

Incidence, Disability, and Mortality in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the epidemiological features of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in the Korean population.

METHODS

Patients with GBS were defined as those who were hospitalized with a primary diagnostic code of G61.0 on the Korean Classification of Disease in a department of neurology, rehabilitation medicine, or pediatrics. We evaluated the incidence and prevalence of GBS as well as physical disability, mortality, and cause of death in patients with GBS from 2002 to 2018 in the Korean population using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.

RESULTS

We identified 11,146 patients with GBS. The ratio of males to females was 1.48. The age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 persons increased steadily from 0.84 in 2002 to 1.68 in 2018, as did the age-adjusted prevalence rate per 100,000 persons, from 0.77 to 15.62. The incidence and prevalence of GBS increased with age, peaking at 70-79 years. Among 10,114 patients without physical disability at the time of GBS being diagnosed, 502 (5.0%) patients had moderate disability and 526 (5.2%) had severe disability by the end of the study period. A total of 1,221 (11.0%) patients with GBS died during the mean follow-up period of 17 years (2002-2019). There were 144 (1.3%) in-hospital deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first nationwide epidemiological study of patients with GBS covering the entire population including patients of all ages in the Republic of Korea. We have revealed the seasonality of admissions, disability, and long-term mortality rates in patients with GBS.

Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19: an observational multicentre study from two Italian hotspot regions

OBJECTIVE

Single cases and small series of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been reported during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak worldwide. We evaluated incidence and clinical features of GBS in a cohort of patients from two regions of northern Italy with the highest number of patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

GBS cases diagnosed in 12 referral hospitals from Lombardy and Veneto in March and April 2020 were retrospectively collected. As a control population, GBS diagnosed in March and April 2019 in the same hospitals were considered.

RESULTS

Incidence of GBS in March and April 2020 was 0.202/100 000/month (estimated rate 2.43/100 000/year) vs 0.077/100 000/month (estimated rate 0.93/100 000/year) in the same months of 2019 with a 2.6-fold increase. Estimated incidence of GBS in COVID-19-positive patients was 47.9/100 000 and in the COVID-19-positive hospitalised patients was 236/100 000. COVID-19-positive patients with GBS, when compared with COVID-19-negative subjects, showed lower MRC sum score (26.3±18.3 vs 41.4±14.8, p=0.006), higher frequency of demyelinating subtype (76.6% vs 35.3%, p=0.011), more frequent low blood pressure (50% vs 11.8%, p=0.017) and higher rate of admission to intensive care unit (66.6% vs 17.6%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows an increased incidence of GBS during the COVID-19 outbreak in northern Italy, supporting a pathogenic link. COVID-19-associated GBS is predominantly demyelinating and seems to be more severe than non-COVID-19 GBS, although it is likely that in some patients the systemic impairment due to COVID-19 might have contributed to the severity of the whole clinical picture.

Determining the Utility of the Guillain-Barré Syndrome Classification Criteria

Background and Purpose

Several variants of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) exist, but their frequencies vary in different populations and do not always meet the inclusion criteria of the existing diagnostic criteria. However, the GBS classification criteria by Wakerley and colleagues recognize and define the clinical characteristics of each variant. We applied these criteria to a GBS and MFS cohort with the aim of determining their utility.

Methods

Consecutive GBS and MFS patients presenting to our center between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. The clinical characteristics, electrophysiological data, and antiganglioside antibody profiles of the patients were utilized in determining the clinical classification.

Results

This study classified 132 patients with GBS and its related disorders according to the new classification criteria as follows: 64 (48.5%) as classic GBS, 2 (1.5%) as pharyngeal-cervical-brachial (PCB) variant, 7 (5.3%) as paraparetic GBS, 29 (22%) as classic MFS, 3 (2.3%) as acute ophthalmoparesis, 2 (1.5%) as acute ataxic neuropathy, 2 (1.5%) as Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE), 17 (12.9%) as GBS/MFS overlap, 4 (3%) as GBS/BBE overlap, 1 (0.8%) as MFS/PCB overlap, and 1 (0.8%) as polyneuritis cranialis. The electrodiagnosis was demyelinating in 55% of classic GBS patients but unclassified in 79% of classic MFS patients. Anti-GM1, anti-GD1a, anti-GalNAc-GD1a, and anti-GD1b IgG ganglioside antibodies were more commonly detected in the axonal GBS subtype, whereas the anti-GQ1b and anti-GT1a IgG ganglioside antibodies were more common in classic MFS and its subtypes.

Conclusions

Most of the patients in the present cohort met the criteria of either classic GBS or MFS, but variants were seen in one-third of patients. These findings support the need to recognize variants of both syndromes in order to achieve a more-complete case ascertainment in GBS.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome, variants & forms fruste: Reclassification with new criteria

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of various distinctive classical and localised Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical characteristics and electrophysiological data of sixty-one consecutive patients admitted between 2012 and 2015 were systematically analysed and reclassified according to the new GBS clinical classification. Neurophysiology was evaluated with Hadden et al.'s vs recently proposed Rajabally et al.'s criteria. Functional severity and clinical outcome of various GBS subtypes were ascertained.

RESULTS

All patients initially identified as GBS or related disorders can be sub-classified into having classical GBS (41, 67%), classic Miller-Fisher Syndrome (MFS) (6, 10%), Pharyngeal-cervical-brachial (PCB) (3, 5%), paraparetic GBS (4, 7%), bifacial weakness with paresthesia (3, 5%), acute ophthalmoparesis (AO) (1, 2%) and overlap syndrome (3, 5%): one (2%) with GBS/Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis overlap and 2 (3%) with GBS/MFS overlap. Greater proportion of axonal classical GBS (67% vs 55%, p=0.372) seen with Rajabally et al.'s criteria and a predominantly axonal form of paraparetic variant (75%) independent of electrodiagnostic criteria were more representative of Asian GBS cohort. Classical GBS patients had lowest admission and discharge Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRCSS), greater functional disability and longest length of in-patient stay. Twenty (20/21, 95%) patients who needed mechanical ventilation had classical GBS. Patients required repeated dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (5/6, 3%) or plasma exchange (4/4, 100%) more frequently had axonal form of classical GBS.

CONCLUSION

Phenotype recognition based on new GBS clinical classification, supported by electrodiagnostic study permits more precise clinical subtypes determination and outcome prognostication.

Clinical classification of 103 Japanese patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the commonest cause of flaccid paralysis worldwide. Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) is a variant of GBS characterized by ophthalmoplegia and ataxia. Together GBS and MFS form a continuum of discrete and overlapping subtypes, the frequency of which remains unknown. We retrospectively analysed the clinical features (antecedent symptoms, pattern of neurological weakness or ataxia, presence of hypersomnolence) of 103 patients at a single hospital in Japan. Patients were then classified according to new diagnostic criteria (Wakerley et al., 2014). Laboratory data (neurophysiology and anti-ganglioside antibody profiles) were also analysed. According to the new diagnostic criteria, the 103 patients could be classified as follows: classic GBS 73 (71%), pharyngeal-cervical-brachial weakness 2 (2%), acute pharyngeal weakness 0 (0%), paraparetic GBS 1 (1%), bifacial weakness with paraesthesias 1 (1%), polyneuritis cranialis 0 (0%), classic MFS 18 (17%), acute ophthalmoparesis 1 (1%), acute ptosis 0 (0%), acute mydriasis 0 (0%), acute ataxic neuropathy 1 (1%), Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis 3 (3%), acute ataxic hypersomnolence 0 (0%), GBS and MFS overlap 1 (1%), GBS and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis overlap 1 (1%), MFS and pharyngeal-cervical-brachial weakness overlap 1 (1%). Application of the new clinical diagnostic criteria allowed accurate retrospective diagnosis and classification of GBS and MFS subtypes.

Population incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Population incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is required to assess changes in GBS epidemiology, but published estimates of GBS incidence vary greatly depending on case ascertainment, definitions, and sample size. We performed a meta-analysis of articles on GBS incidence by searching Medline (1966-2009), Embase (1988-2009), Cinahl (1981-2009) and CABI (1973-2009) as well as article bibliographies. We included studies from North America and Europe with at least 20 cases, and used population-based data, subject matter experts to confirm GBS diagnosis, and an accepted GBS case definition. With these data, we fitted a random-effects negative binomial regression model to estimate age-specific GBS incidence. Of 1,683 nonduplicate citations, 16 met the inclusion criteria, which produced 1,643 cases and 152.7 million person-years of follow-up. GBS incidence increased by 20% for every 10-year increase in age; the risk of GBS was higher for males than females. The regression equation for calculating the average GBS rate per 100,000 person-years as a function of age in years was exp[-12.0771 + 0.01813(age in years)] × 100,000. Our findings provide a robust estimate of background GBS incidence in Western countries. Our regression model may be used in comparable populations to estimate the background age-specific rate of GBS incidence for future studies.

Incidence and clinical features of acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy in Lombardy, Italy, 1996

OBJECTIVE

To assess the annual incidence of typical Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and its main variants (atypical GBS) in a well-defined population from a large area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A population-based prospective survey of GBS was undertaken during the calendar year 1996 in Lombardy, Italy (population 8,891,652). Typical and atypical GBS was diagnosed using the National Institutes of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Ropper criteria. Eligible cases were hospital inpatients traced through a regional registry, the hospital discharge diagnoses, and an ongoing case-control study. Diagnostic and demographic findings were collected for each case. Complete clinical and laboratory features were available for 80% of cases.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients (males 74; females 64) aged 2-91 years fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for typical GBS (128) or atypical GBS (10). GBS variants included Miller-Fisher syndrome (four cases), cranial polyneuritis (three cases), pure motor GBS (two cases), and sensory loss with areflexia (one case). The crude annual incidence of GBS was 1.55 per 100,000 (typical GBS 1.43; atypical GBS 0.11; male 1.67; female 1.43; age <35 years, 0.79; 35-54 years, 1.33; 55-74 years, 3.22; 75+ years, 4.67). The overall rate was 1.58 when age- and sex-adjusted to the 1996 Italian population. Previous infections were reported for 37% of patients. The electrophysiological findings indicated demyelination in 51%, primary axonopathy in 14%, and mixed myelin and axon involvement in 27%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of typical GBS is comparable with that in other reports using the NINCDS diagnostic criteria. Atypical GBS accounts for a limited number of cases.

Peripheral Neuropathy

This chapter focuses on peripheral neuropathy, which is the third or fourth most common neurologic disorder, even among the elderly. It begins with a description of the classification system for peripheral neuropathies. Because the underlying etiology or precipitating events of peripheral neuropathy are identifiable for the majority of affected individuals, epidemiologic research has largely focused on descriptive studies of disease frequency or on identifying the factors that modify the influence of the already existing risk factors. Three of the most common neuropathies are covered in detail: diabetic neuropathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. Each of these conditions is discussed in terms of distribution and risk factors, and is concluded with a discussion of future research directions to address unanswered questions. The chapter emphasizes methodologic approaches that that could be employed to improve the rigor of studies of these conditions.

Epidemiology of the Guillain-Barré syndrome

This review focuses on recent epidemiological findings on Guillain-Barré syndrome regarding incidence, antecedent events related to the disease, prognosis and prognostic indicators, and treatment. Moreover, this review summarizes recent observations on clinical variants of Guillain-Barré syndrome and their relationship with the prevailing clinical presentation of the disease. The epidemiological observations which have advanced the understanding of the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome are also discussed.

Clinical presentation and outcome of Guillain-Barré and related syndromes in relation to anti-ganglioside antibodies

We correlated the clinical features of 78 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or related variants, with the presence of serum antibodies to the gangliosides GM1, GM2, GD1a, GD1b and GQ1b in order to determine whether these antibodies may influence the clinical presentation or outcome of GBS. Sixty-three patients had typical GBS (81%), nine a pure motor form (11%), three a paraparetic form (4%), and three had Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). IgG or IgM (or both) anti-ganglioside antibodies were found by ELISA in 37% of patients, including 36% with typical, 33% with pure motor and 100% with MFS. Beside the constant occurrence of anti-GQ1b antibodies in patients with MFS (P<0.00001), the other clinical forms were not associated with a specific anti-ganglioside reactivity. Anti-GM1 and anti-GD1a antibodies tended to be associated with a worse disability at 6 month than other or no reactivity and, similarly to anti-GM2 antibodies, with a more frequent respiratory impairment. Anti-GM2 and anti-GD1b antibodies were always associated with typical GBS and, in all but one patient, with a complete recovery; still they were found in only 13 and 3%, respectively, of the patients with this presentation. Anti-GQ1b antibodies, though always associated with ophthalmoplegia and ataxia in both MFS and GBS, were found in only 36 and 26%, respectively, of patients with these symptoms. Even if different anti-ganglioside antibodies tend to be associated with some clinical features possibly suggesting that they may influence the clinical presentation or outcome, with the exception of anti-GQ1b antibodies for ophthalmoplegia and ataxia, they do not permit to predict the clinical presentation or outcome in individual patients.

Guillain-Barré syndrome variants in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 1992-3: incidence, clinical features, and prognosis. Emilia-Romagna Study Group on Clinical and Epidemiological Problems in Neurology

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the incidence rate of Guillain-Barré syndrome variants in an unselected population and to describe their clinical features and prognosis.

METHODS

A two year prospective multicentre study on the incidence and prognosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome was performed in Emilia-Romagna, northern Italy (3,909,512 inhabitants). A surveillance system was instituted within the study area, which comprised all the neurological departments, private and public general hospitals, and practising neurologists. The international classification of diseases (ICD) codes 357.XX (any peripheral neuropathy) of hospital discharges were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Data were separately analysed for Miller Fisher syndrome and other Guillain-Barré syndrome variants. During the study period 18 patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome variants including seven with Miller Fisher syndrome were recruited; the incidence rates were 0.14/100000/year (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.07-0.25) for Guillain-Barré syndrome variants (excluding Miller Fisher syndrome) and 0.09/100000/year (95% CI 0.04-0.18) for Miller Fisher syndrome. Guillain-Barré syndrome variants alone (excluding Miller Fisher syndrome) accounted for 10.5% of total cases. Death and relapses were not found. Details of clinical, electrophysiological, and CSF findings of Guillain-Barré syndrome variants are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Guillain-Barré syndrome variants other than Miller Fisher syndrome, as obtained through a population based study, account for about 10% of total cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome and, as a whole, have a good prognosis. Their clinical features are heterogeneous; bifacial weakness (associated with other signs, mainly sensory disturbances) represents the most frequent finding.