What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement?

Efficacy and safety of galacto-oligosaccharide in the treatment of functional constipation: randomized clinical trial

The efficacy and safety of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) in treating functional constipation were evaluated in a four-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 63 patients who met Rome IV criteria (34 GOS, 29 placebo group). The number of bowel movements per day and changes in the shape of bowel movements in the treatment group significantly improved compared to those in the control group after four weeks. The Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire showed that satisfaction with constipation significantly increased in the treatment group. The levels of Bifidobacterium sp. and Lactobacillus sp. significantly increased after four weeks of GOS treatment compared to those measured at baseline. No significant adverse drug reactions were identified in any indicator except for pulse rate. Thus, the prebiotic GOS can be safely used in foods and pharmaceuticals to alleviate symptoms of functional constipation by improving the intestinal flora.

Radiopaque marker colonic transit study in the pediatric population BSPGHAN Motility Working Group consensus statement

Functional constipation (FC) is a common condition in childhood in the United Kingdom and worldwide. Various radiological approaches have been established for diagnostic purposes. The radiopaque marker study (ROMS) is universally accepted and used to assess colonic transit time (CTT) in children with FC. Despite being widely used, there is a lack of standardization with various technical protocols, reproducibility of different populations, the purpose for using investigation, variance in the number of markers used, the amount of study days and calculations, the need to empty the colon before performing the test, and whether to perform on medication or off, or the use of specific diets. As part of the British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) motility working group (MWG), we decided to explore further into the evidence, in order to provide guidance regarding the use of ROMS in dealing with FC in the pediatric population.

Imaging in pediatric disorders of the gut-brain interactions: current best practice and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Disorders of Gut-Brain Interactions (DGBI) are a common clinical problem in children and pose significant challenges to the attending pediatrician. Radiological investigations are commonly ordered to evaluate these children.

AREA COVERED

This review focuses on the current best practice of using radiological investigations in DGBIs and how novel radiological investigations could revolutionize the assessment and therapeutic approach of DGBI in children.

EXPERT OPINION

We believe imaging in DGBI is still in its early stages, but it has the potential to revolutionize how we diagnose and treat children with DGBI. As the understanding of the gut-brain axis continues to grow, we can expect to see the disappearance of conventional imaging techniques and the emergence of more sophisticated imaging techniques with less radiation exposure in the future which provide more clinically meaningful information regarding the gut-brain axis and its influence on intestinal function. Some of the novel imaging modalities will be able to broaden our horizon of understanding DGBI in children providing more useful therapeutic options to minimize their suffering.

Colonic Function Investigations in Children: Review by the ESPGHAN Motility Working Group

Disorders of colonic motility, most often presenting as constipation, comprise one of the commonest causes of outpatient visits in pediatric gastroenterology. This review, discussed and created by the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Motility Working Group, is a practical guide, which highlights the recent advances in pediatric colonic motility testing including indications, technical principles of the tests, patient preparation, performance and basis of the results' analysis of the tests. classical methods, such as colonic transit time (cTT) with radiopaque markers and colonic scintigraphy, as well as manometry and novel techniques, such as wireless motility capsule and electromagnetic capsule tracking systems are discussed.

Biopsychosocial Model and Perceived Constipation Severity According to the Constipation Phenotype

PURPOSE

Constipation is a frequent complaint of patients with functional bowel disorders. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the perceived constipation severity with demographics, clinical, physiological, and psychological parameters in constipated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seven constipated patients were included and had clinical, physiological, and psychological evaluation. The self-reported severity of constipation was analyzed using stepwise linear regression in the total population and within each clinical group.

RESULTS

The patients were mainly of female gender (81%) and were 47.4 ± 16.5 years old. They complained of IBS (65%), and 62% had defecation disorders. The depression scale was abnormal in 200 patients (49%). The relationships of the constipation severity varied according to the Rome IV phenotype. In all phenotypes, it was positively associated with bloating severity, and negatively with Bristol stool form. In IBS patients, perceived constipation severity was also associated with abdominal pain severity.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the hypothesis that perceived constipation severity is associated with clinical and physiological factors but not demographics and psychological factors. Besides, the relationships of perceived constipation severity with these factors vary according to clinical phenotypes.

In vivo models to evaluate ingestible devices: Present status and current trends

Evaluation of orally ingestible devices is critical to optimize their performance early in development. Using animals as a pre-clinical tool can provide useful information on functionality, yet it is important to recognize that animal gastrointestinal physiology, pathophysiology and anatomy can differ to that in humans and that the most suitable species needs to be selected to inform the evaluation. There has been a move towards in vitro and in silico models rather than animal models in line with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) as well as the better control and reproducibility associated with these systems. However, there are still instances where animal models provide the greatest understanding. This paper provides an overview of key aspects of human gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology and compares parameters to those reported in animal species. The value of each species can be determined based upon the parameter of interest from the ingested device when considering the use of pre-clinical animal testing.

Colonic Transit Time and Fecal Impaction in Children and Adolescents With Cystic Fibrosis-associated Constipation

BACKGROUND

Constipation is prevalent in pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and colonic motility has not been studied in this population. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the total and segmental colonic transit time in children and adolescents with CF based on the presence of constipation and radiological fecal impaction.

METHODS

In this case series, all patients aged 3 to 20 years of a CF reference center were invited to participate. CF-associated constipation was diagnosed based on the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition criteria. Total and segmental colonic transit time was determined using radiopaque markers. Fecal impaction on plain abdominal radiography was assessed based on the Barr score.

RESULTS

Of the 43 eligible patients, 34 (79%) agreed to participate. Constipation was found in 44.1% of children and adolescents, predominantly in girls. The total colonic transit time (medians of 42 and 24 hours, respectively, P = 0.028) and the segmental right colon transit time (medians of 8 and 2 hours, respectively, P = 0.012) were significantly longer in CF-associated constipation group than in the group of patients without constipation. The frequency of radiological fecal impaction was similar in patients with (50.0%) and without (64.2%) CF-associated constipation (P = 0.70). There was no relationship between radiological fecal impaction and the total and segmental colonic transit time.

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with CF-associated constipation had a longer total and segmental right colon transit time. Colonic transit time was similar in patients with and without radiological fecal impaction.

Rectosigmoid Localization of Radiopaque Markers for Identifying Defecation Disorders in Patients With Chronic Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Defecation disorders (DD) are part of the spectrum of chronic constipation with outlet obstruction. Although anorectal physiologic tests are required for the diagnosis of DD, these tests are not available in many institutions. This study aims to investigate the predictivity of DD using rectosigmoid localization of radiopaque markers in a colonic transit study.

METHODS

A total of 169 patients with refractory constipation with a mean age of 67 years were studied. All patients underwent anorectal manometry, a balloon expulsion test, and a colonic transit study. Barium defecography was performed if needed. The relationship between DD diagnosed by these anorectal tests and the rectosigmoid accumulation of markers was examined.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (46.7%) patients were identified to have DD based on anorectal test combinations. Rectosigmoid accumulation of markers was observed in 39 (23.1%) patients. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of rectosigmoid accumulation for identifying DD were 31.6% and 64.1%, respectively. Rectosigmoid accumulation provided poor discrimination of DD from normal transit constipation, at a specificity of 82.1% but with a sensitivity of only 10.6%. In discriminating DD from slow transit constipation, rectosigmoid accumulation was found to be useful with a positive likelihood ratio of 5.3.

CONCLUSION

s Rectosigmoid accumulation of markers can differentiate DD from slow transit constipation. However, non-rectosigmoid accumulation does not exclude the presence of DD.

Bowel transit studies in children: evidence base, role and practicalities

Constipation is common in children and adults with varied worldwide prevalence. The majority of children have functional constipation as defined by Rome clinical criteria and respond favourably to standard medical therapy; up to one-third can develop difficult-to-treat constipation requiring investigation and specialist treatment. Colon function tests aim to assess the neuromuscular integrity, the movement of faeces across the colon and evaluate/predict response to the therapy. The 'ideal' test should be practical, non-invasive, widely available and cost-effective. None of the available diagnostic tools is designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of colon function and clinicians often have to combine more than one test to answer different questions. In this review, we aim to assess the strengths and limitations of the commonly available diagnostic investigations (radiopaque marker studies, scintigraphy, wireless motility capsule and colonic manometry) used to assess colon transit in children and to provide guidance on the most appropriate test for particular clinical settings.

Increased colon transit time and faecal load in irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a bowel disorder involving abdominal pain or discomfort along with irregularity of stool form and passage frequency. The pathophysiology is poorly understood and seems to be multifactorial. Investigations of possible causes of IBS have included only a few colonic transit studies and no simultaneous determination of the colonic faecal content.

AIM

To compare colon transit time and faecal load between IBS-patients and healthy control subjects.

METHODS

The study included 140 patients with IBS, with a mean age of 50.0 years. The control group comprised 44 healthy persons with a mean age of 43.4 years, who were selected at random from the National Civil Register. Both the patient group and the control group underwent a marker study to measure colon transit time (CTT) and to calculate a faecal loading score. The patient group underwent treatment with a combined prokinetic regime, after which their CTT and faecal loading were reassessed. Analyses were performed to compare measurements between the control group and the patient group before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, IBS-patients exhibited a significantly prolonged mean CTT (45.48 h vs 24.75 h, P = 0.0002) and significantly greater mean faecal loading scores in all colonic segments (P < 0.001). Among IBS patients, we found no significant differences between the 48 h and 96 h radiographs. Among patients exhibiting increased CTT and faecal loading, approximately half exhibited a palpable mass in the right iliac fossa. After intervention with a prokinetic treatment, the mean CTT among IBS patients was reduced from 45.48 h to 34.50 h (P = 0.091), with the post-treatment CTT not significantly differing from the CTT among control subjects (P = 0.095). The faecal loading score among IBS patients did not significantly differ before and after treatment (P = 0.442). The post-treatment faecal loading score in IBS patients remained significantly higher compared to that in controls (5.3 vs 4.3, P = 0.014). After treatment, half of the IBS-patients were relieved of bloating, while the majority no longer experienced abdominal pain and achieved a daily consistent stool.

CONCLUSION

IBS-patients exhibited prolonged CTT and heavier faecal loading. These assessments may aid in diagnosis. Faecal retention may contribute to IBS symptoms, which can be treated using a prokinetic regime.

Clinical, Physiological, and Psychological Correlates of the Improvement of Defecation during Menses in Women with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Little is known about the improvement in defecation frequently reported by women around menses. We aimed to describe clinical, physiological, and psychological correlates of this improvement in those with functional bowel disorders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 478 consecutive premenopausal adult females with no indication of gynecologic or psychiatric disease, who were attending an outpatient functional bowel disorders clinic. Patients completed a Rome III questionnaire, psychological evaluation stool form, and a 10-point Likert scale for constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain. These patients underwent physiological tests, anorectal manometry, and colonic transit time and were classified according to the presence or the absence of improvement in defecation during menses. The reverse selection procedure was used for model selection during multivariate logistic regression where statistically significant variables (p < 0.01) remained in the adjusted model.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (20%) reported easier defecation during menstruation. These patients were younger (p < 0.001) but had similar body mass indices and psychological profiles as the other patients. Clinically, they only reported more frequent irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation (p = 0.007), with harder stools (p = 0.005) and delayed left colon transit time (p = 0.002). No anorectal manometric parameter was different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of constipation during menses is mainly associated with younger age and constipation-IBS phenotype and not with functional constipation.

Dyssynergic patterns of defecation in constipated adolescents and young adults with anorectal malformations

We aimed to evaluate the etiologies of constipation in patients with anorectal malformations having a good prognosis for bowel control but a high risk of constipation. We included twenty-five patients from the Odense university hospital in Denmark. Patients were subjected to colon transit time examination and high resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM). The median age was 18 (14–24) and 48% (12/25) were females. Fifty-two % (13/25) of patients were diagnosed with constipation. Types of anorectal malformation were perineal fistula (9/25), rectovestibular fistula (8/25), rectourethral bulbar fistula (5/25) and no fistula (3/25). No difference in neither total colon transit time nor segmental colon transit times were found based on the presence of constipation. Only four of the constipated patients fulfilled criteria for dyssynergic defecation with a dyssynergic pattern at HRAM and prolonged colon transit time. A Type I dyssynergic pattern was dominant in constipated patients (7/13). A Dyssynergic defecation pattern was due to isolated contraction of puborectalis muscle in 9 out of 13constipated patients. We found a dyssynergic pattern during attempted defecation in patients with anorectal malformations disregarded the presence of constipation. In the majority of constipated patients an isolated contraction of the puborectalis muscle was visualized with HRAM.

Imaging Measurement of Whole Gut Transit Time in Paediatric and Adult Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

BACKGROUND

functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are common conditions in children and adults, often associated with abnormalities of whole gut transit. Currently, transit tests can be performed using several imaging methods, including tracking of radiopaque markers, gamma scintigraphy with the use of radioisotopes, magnetic tracking methods, tracking of movement of wireless motility capsules, and emerging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches.

OBJECTIVES

to review recent literature on diagnostic imaging techniques used to investigate whole gut transit in FGIDs.

METHODS

a systematic review was carried out. The different techniques are described briefly, with particular emphasis on contemporary literature and new developments, particularly in the field of MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

emerging MRI capsule marker methods are promising new tools to study whole gut transit in FGIDs.

The effect of a probiotic blend on gastrointestinal symptoms in constipated patients: a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled 2-week trial

Selected strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria are known to ameliorate constipation-related symptoms and have previously shown efficacy on digestive health. In this clinical trial, the safety and effectiveness of a probiotic blend containing lactobacilli and bifidobacteria were evaluated in adults with self-reported bloating and functional constipation. Constipation was diagnosed by the Rome III criteria. A total of 156 adults were randomised into this double-blind and placebo-controlled trial. Participants consumed the combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (10¹⁰ cfu), Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37 (2.5×10⁹ cfu), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains Bl-04 (2.5×10⁹ cfu), Bi-07 (2.5×10⁹ cfu) and HN019 (10¹⁰ cfu) (n=78), or placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) (n=78) for two weeks. After treatment the following were measured: primary outcome of bloating and secondary outcomes of colonic transit time, bowel movement frequency, stool consistency, other gastrointestinal symptoms (flatulence, abdominal pain, and burbling), constipation-related questionnaires (PAC-SYM and PAC-QoL) and product satisfaction. Faecal recovery of consumed strains was determined. The enrolled population was defined as constipated, however, the initial bloating severity was lower than in previous similar studies. No clinically significant observations related to the safety of the product were reported. Product efficacy was not shown in the primary analysis for bloating nor for the secondary efficacy analyses. The placebo functioned similarly as the probiotic product. In post-hoc analysis, a statistically significant decrease in flatulence in favour of the probiotic group was observed; day 7 (intention-to-treat (ITT): P=0.0313; per-protocol (PP): 0.0253) and on day 14 (ITT: P=0.0116; PP: P=0.0102) as measured by area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The mean AUC of all symptoms decreased in favour of the probiotic group, indicating less digestive discomfort. The study was registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN41607808).

Influence of Age and Body Mass Index on Total and Segmental Colonic Transit Times in Constipated Subjects

Background/Aims

Discordant data are found in the literature for the relationships between total and segmental colonic transit time (CTT) and demographic parameters. The aim of this study is to examine the influence of age, and body mass index (BMI) on total and segmental CTT in constipated subjects.

Methods

We included 354 constipated patients on this cross-sectional study. According to the Rome III criteria, patients were classified as having irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or functional constipation. All patients filled the Bristol stool form, and reported the severity of constipation, bloating, and abdominal pain on a 10-point Likert scale. Total and segmental CTT were measured using radiopaque markers.

Results

Females were 84% of patients, with a mean age of 46.0 ± 15.9 years. The association between total and segmental CTT with age and BMI was significant after adjustment for gender, clinical phenotype, the presence of defecation disorders, and abdominal pain or bloating intensity despite the severity of symptoms, and the frequency of defecation disorders were higher in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation than in functional constipation patients. By comparison with subjects less than 30 years, rectosigmoid transit time (RSTT) was lower in patients between 30 and 60 years. Age was negatively associated with RSTT (P = 0.004). By comparison with patients with normal BMI, RSTT and total CTT were lower in patients of the overweight group. BMI was negatively associated with RSTT (P < 0.001). The severity of constipation was correlated with total (P < 0.001), right (P = 0.002), and left CTT (P = 0.049).

Conclusion

Age and BMI are both associated with RSTT in constipated patients.

Colonic Stool Burden a Useful Surrogate for Slow Transit Constipation as Determined by a Radiopaque Transit Study

OBJECTIVES

Plain film abdominal x-ray (AXR) is frequently used in the evaluation of constipation, but studies assessing the association between stool burden on AXR and colonic transit have been limited. We sought to investigate the relationship between colonic stool burden and slow transit constipation, as determined by a radiopaque marker (ROM) transit study.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort population was assembled, consisting of adult patients with chronic constipation who underwent testing with both a ROM study and anorectal manometry at 2 tertiary care centers over 5 years. Stool burden was graded by 2 independent observers, with colonic transit being assessed by the Hinton method.

RESULTS

Of 361 patients, 145 (40.3%) had slow transit constipation, and women were more likely than men to have slow transit constipation (42.3% vs 26.5%, P = 0.04). The mean stool burden scores by observer 1 and observer 2 for patients with slow transit constipation were significantly higher than the mean stool burden scores for patients with normal transit constipation (8.1 ± 1.6 vs 6.9 ± 1.9, P < 0.0001; 8.5 ± 1.5 vs 5.8 ± 1.6, P < 0.0001). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the stool burden score and number of remaining ROMs was 0.31 (moderate) for observer 1 (P < 0.0001) and 0.62 (strong) for observer 2 (P < 0.0001), whereas the Pearson correlation coefficient for interrater reliability of the stool burden score was 0.58 (P < 0.0001), indicating a strong correlation. The ideal score cutoff for both observers was 7, with moderate agreement by Cohen's kappa (0.43, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stool burden assessment on AXR may be a reliable alternative ROM study in the assessment of colonic transit.

More movement with evaluating colonic transit in humans

BACKGROUND

Colonic functions (ie, absorption of fluids and electrolytes, digestion of selected nutrients, harbor for microbes, and elimination of excreta) necessitate complex patterns of storage and transit. Indeed, colonic transit accounts for a major part of the mouth-to-anus transit time. Colonic transit assessments are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of disease, the pharmacodynamic effects of new medications and to diagnose slow transit constipation. Currently, radiopaque markers, scintigraphy, and a colonic pH-pressure capsule are used to measure overall colonic transit. Radioopaque markers, scintigraphy, and the electromagnetic capsule, which is a newer technique, also evaluate regional colonic transit. The pH-pressure capsule also measures colonic pressures. Magnetic resonance imaging and a radio-frequency identification-based device are evolving methods for assessing colonic transit.

PURPOSE

This mini-review, which accompanies a study evaluating the assessment of colon transit with the electromagnetic capsule, evaluates and compares existing and evolving methods for evaluating colonic transit in humans (Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; in press). In addition to overall and regional colonic transit, the electromagnetic capsule evaluates colonic motor patterns without radiation exposure. These patterns are summarized by analyzing the characteristics (ie, distance and velocity) of discrete antegrade and retrograde capsule movements as they travel in the colon. However, the electromagnetic capsule does not measure pressure or colonic wall movement (ie, contractions). The motor patterns identified by this capsule should be compared with motor patterns identified with manometry. The next challenge is to harness different techniques to evaluate the relationships between colonic pressures and transit or, even better, the trifecta of colonic contractions, pressure events, and transit.

Assessment of stool frequency and colonic transit time in Indian children with functional constipation and healthy controls

INTRODUCTION

Indian adults have higher stool frequency and shorter colonic transit time compared to the Western population. Colonic transit time has not been studied well in Indian children. We aimed to compare colonic transit time in normal and constipated children.

METHODS

In this prospective study, stool characteristics and colonic transit time by radio-opaque markers were studied in healthy children (group A, n = 39) and functional constipation patients (group B, n = 61). Twenty radio-opaque markers were ingested per orally at 0, 12, and 24 h followed by a single abdominal X-ray at 36 h. Total and segmental colonic transit times were calculated using the standard formula.

RESULTS

Stool frequency per week and consistency were significantly different between group A (9 [2.5-17] years) vs. group B (4.5 [2-14] years), 7 (7-14) vs.1 (1-2), and Bristol type 4 (3-5) vs. type 2 (1-3). Total colonic transit time of groups A and B was 16.2 (0.6-36) vs. 22.8 (1.8-35.4) hours; p = 0.003. Ninety-fifth percentile (upper limit of normal) cutoff derived from group A was 31.8 h. Ninety-two percent of group B had colonic transit < 95th percentile of normal healthy children. Despite 8% with colonic transit > 95th percentile, all group B patients responded well to standard therapy with laxatives.

CONCLUSION

Indian children have significantly higher stool frequency and shorter colonic transit time, which are different compared to the reported figures from the West. Most of the Indian children with functional constipation had normal colonic transit time.

Painful or Mild-Pain Constipation? A Clinically Useful Alternative to Classification as Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation Versus Functional Constipation

PURPOSE

Abdominal pain is not used to characterize constipated patients. This study aimed to compare clinical, psychological, and physiological features in patients with IBS-constipation (IBS-C) with those in patients with functional constipation (FC) according to the intensity of abdominal pain.

METHODS

All patients filled a standard Rome III questionnaire. In addition, they indicated the intensity of constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and abdominal pain on a 10-point Likert scale, and their stool form with the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Physiological evaluation included anorectal manometry and total and segmental colonic transit time.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 546 consecutive patients, 245 with IBS-C and 301 with FC, were included. Painful constipation (PFC) was found by cluster analysis and subsequently defined as having a value over four on the Likert scale for abdominal pain. PFC was found in 67% of IBS-C patients and in 22% of FC patients. PFC patients have digestive disorders with greater frequency and report higher levels of constipation and bloating, despite similar stool form. They have higher scores of depression, state and trait anxiety, and shorter terminal transit time than mild-pain constipated patients. Compared to IBS-C patients, PFC patients report higher levels of abdominal pain (P < 0.001). Psychological and physiological parameters were similar in PFC and IBS-C patients.

CONCLUSION

Painful constipation and mild-pain constipation could be an alternative way to identify constipated patients than using the diagnosis of IBS-C and FC for clinical evaluation and drug studies.

Diagnostic Tests in Pediatric Constipation

Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal symptoms in children. With a median reported prevalence of 12%, it accounts for about 25% of all pediatric gastroenterology consultations. The majority of children experiences functional constipation and do not usually require any diagnostic testing. For those children not responding to conventional medical treatment or in the presence of a more significant clinical picture, however, an accurate instrumental assessment is usually recommended to evaluate either the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms or a possible organic etiology. The present review analyzes the possible diagnostic investigations for severely constipated children, focusing on their actual indications and their utility in clinical practice. During the last decade, there has been a remarkable increase in our knowledge of normal and abnormal colonic and anorectal motility in children, and a number of different techniques to measure transit and motility have been developed and are discussed in this narrative review.

Osteopathic management of chronic constipation in women patients. Results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Constipation is a common problem in western countries. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the treatment of constipated women with functional constipation (FC) or defeation disorders (DD).

METHODS

Twenty-one constipated females referred to a tertiary center were recruited. A course of OMT, weekly for four weeks, was given. Clinical questionnaire, Bristol stool form scale and patients' subjective perception of constipation, bloating and abdominal pain, were recorded. Total and segmental colonic transit time (CTT) were performed before and after OMT.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had FC and 10 DD, as defined by Rome III criteria. After OMT, the Knowless Eccersley Scott Symptom score (P=0.020), the oro-anal transit time (P=0.002), the right (P=0.005) and left (P=0.009) CTT had decreased while the stool frequency (P=0.005) and the Bristol Stool Form scale (P=0.003) had increased. After OMT, the intensity of constipation, and the Patient assessment of constipation symptoms score did not change but a decrease of abdominal pain, bloating, quality of life score and drug use was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows OMT has potential benefit for treating functional constipation in women. Further randomised trials are required to confirm these results.

Normative Values for Colonic Transit Time and Patient Assessment of Constipation in Adults With Functional Constipation: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Availability of normative patient outcome data may assist in designing experiments and estimating sample sizes. The purpose of this review was to determine normative ranges for colonic transit time (CTT), Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM), and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) in adults diagnosed with functional constipation per Rome III guidelines. Pooled estimates were derived from random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to explore sources of heterogeneity among studies. A total of 24 studies (3786 patients) were included in the review. In 10 studies with 1119 patients, pooled CTT was 58 hours (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50-65 hours). Publication bias was not evident (Egger P = .51); heterogeneity was high (I² = 92%, P < .001). In meta-regression, geographical location explained 57% of the between-study variance, with CTT significantly longer in studies conducted in Europe (71 hours) compared with Asia (49 hours) or the Americas (44 hours). In 9 studies with 2061 patients, pooled PAC-SYM was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.58-1.83). Publication bias was not evident (Egger P = .44). Heterogeneity was high (I² = 90%, P < .001); however, no study or patient factor influenced PAC-SYM in meta-regression. In 12 studies with 1805 patients, pooled PAC-QOL was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.70-2.24). Publication bias was not evident (Egger P = .28); heterogeneity was high (I² = 98%, P < .001). In meta-regression, age explained 52% of the between-study variance, with older age associated with lower PAC-QOL scores. Overall, in adults diagnosed with functional constipation per Rome III criteria, significant heterogeneity in CTT, PAC-SYM, and PAC-QOL exists among studies. Variability among studies may be explained by geography and patient factors.

18F-FDG uptake in the colon is modulated by metformin but not associated with core body temperature and energy expenditure

Purpose

Physiological colonic ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake is a frequent finding on ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT). Interestingly, metformin, a glucose lowering drug associated with moderate weight loss, is also associated with an increased colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Consequently, increased colonic glucose use might partly explain the weight losing effect of metformin when this results in an increased energy expenditure and/or core body temperature. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether metformin modifies the metabolic activity of the colon by increasing glucose uptake.

Methods

In this open label, non-randomized, prospective mechanistic study, we included eight lean and eight overweight males. We measured colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake on PET-CT, energy expenditure and core body temperature before and after the use of metformin. The maximal colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was measured in 5 separate segments (caecum, colon ascendens,—transversum,—descendens and sigmoid).

Results

The maximal colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake increased significantly in all separate segments after the use of metformin. There was no significant difference in energy expenditure or core body temperature after the use of metformin. There was no correlation between maximal colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and energy expenditure or core body temperature.

Conclusion

Metformin significantly increases colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, but this increased uptake is not associated with an increase in energy expenditure or core body temperature. Although the colon might be an important site of the glucose plasma lowering actions of metformin, this mechanism of action does not explain directly any associated weight loss.

Surgical management of children with intractable functional constipation; experience of a single tertiary children's hospital

BACKGROUND

Children with intractable functional constipation (FC) may eventually require surgery. However, guidelines regarding the surgical management of children with intractable FC are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the surgical management of FC in children.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of children with FC (according to the Rome III criteria) who underwent ileostomy, colostomy or (sub)total colectomy at a tertiary hospital. Treatment success was defined as no longer fulfilling the Rome III-FC-criteria or having a functional ostomy. In addition, a self-developed questionnaire was administered to parents by telephone to assess postsurgical satisfaction (yes-no question and rated on a scale of 1-10).

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (68% female) were included; median age at first surgery was 12 years (range 1.6-17.6). The initial surgical procedure consisted of ileostomy (n=21), colostomy (n=10), sigmoid resection (n=5) and subtotal colectomy (n=1). Success criteria were fulfilled by 85% of the patients. Postsurgical satisfaction of parents was 91% with a median postoperative satisfaction score of 8 (range 2-10), and 97% would opt for the same procedure(s) if necessary. Thirty patients (81%) experienced stoma problems, with 12 patients (32%) requiring stoma-revisions. Other complications occurred in 16 patients (43%).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Surgery can improve symptoms in children with intractable FC. Despite morbidity and complications, parental satisfaction is high. Prospective, high-quality research is necessary to develop guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and surgical management in children with intractable FC.

Clinical, psychological, and physiological correlates of patients who defecate after meal

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Food is the most important synchronizer of gastrointestinal motility and secretion. Many patients with functional bowel or anorectal disorders complain of fecal urge and stool output after eating.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 408 consecutive outpatients with functional bowel and/or anorectal disorders (74% female, 50.2±15.6 years, 24.8±5.0 kg/m²) filled Rome III questionnaires. Depression and anxiety scores, a physiological evaluation (total and segmental colonic transit time, colonic transit response to eating using a standard 1000 kcal test meal, and anorectal manometry), were measured. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were carried out according to the presence or not of stool output after eating.

RESULTS

Defecation after eating was found in 21% of patients. These patients were not different according to the demographic characteristics of sex ratio (P=0.702), age (P=0.830), and BMI (P=0.314). In contrast, they had lower state anxiety (P=0.032), but similar scores of depression (P=0.240) and trait anxiety (P=0.933). They had similar manometric characteristics (anal pressure and rectal sensitivity), but a greater response to eating in all segments of the colon. There was an increase in the frequency of functional diarrhea (odds ratio=2.576, 95% confidence interval=1.312-5.056; P=0.006) and levator ani syndrome (odds ratio=2.331, 95% confidence interval=1.099-4.944; P=0.017), but no other functional bowel disorder including irritable bowel syndrome and its subtypes was found.

CONCLUSION

Stool output after eating is associated with clinical disorders but not physiological parameters. This symptom is not associated with irritable bowel syndrome, but a higher frequency of functional diarrhea.

Is-it possible to distinguish irritable bowel syndrome with constipation from functional constipation?

BACKGROUND

The Rome III criteria classify patients complaining of constipation into two main groups: patients with functional constipation (FC) and patients with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the intensity of symptoms and total and segmental colonic transit time in these two types of patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective evaluation of 337 outpatients consecutively referred for chronic constipation and classified according to the Rome III criteria as FC or IBS-C. They were asked to report symptom intensity, on a 10-point Likert scale, for diarrhea, constipation, bloating and abdominal pain. Stool form was reported using the Bristol scale, and colonic transit time was measured by using multiple-ingestion single-marker single-film technique. Statistical analysis was completed by a discriminant analysis.

RESULTS

Female gender and obstructed defecation was more frequent in IBS-C patients than in FC patients. IBS-C patients reported greater symptom intensity than FC patients, but stool form, and total and segmental colonic transit time were not different between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only two parameters, bloating and abdominal pain, were related to the IBS-C or to the FC phenotype, and discriminant analysis showed that these two parameters were sufficient to give a correct classification of 71% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that self-evaluation of abdominal pain and bloating is more helpful than colonic transit time in classifying patient as IBS-C or FC.

The Porirua Protocol in the Treatment of Clozapine-Induced Gastrointestinal Hypomotility and Constipation: A Pre- and Post-Treatment Study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine, an antipsychotic used in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, causes slow gastrointestinal transit in 50-80% of patients. Clozapine-induced gastrointestinal hypomotility is both common and serious, and potential complications include severe constipation, ileus, bowel obstruction and related complications, with a higher mortality rate than clozapine-related agranulocytosis. Little evidence exists on its prevention and management.

METHOD

Using a well-validated radiopaque marker ('Metcalf') method, we compared colonic transit times (CTTs) of clozapine-treated inpatients not receiving laxatives with their transit times when receiving laxatives, with treatment prescribed according to the Porirua Protocol for clozapine-related constipation (docusate and senna augmented by macrogol 3350 in treatment-resistant cases).

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 35 years, and median clozapine dose, plasma level and duration of treatment were 575 mg/day, 506 ng/mL and 2.5 years, respectively. Overall, 14 participants (10 male) were enrolled and all completed the study. Transit times improved markedly with laxative treatment. Median colonic transit without laxatives was 110 h (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-144 h), over four times longer than normative values (p < 0.0001). Median CTT with laxatives was 62 h (95% CI 27-96 h), a 2-day reduction in average transit time (p = 0.009). The prevalence of gastrointestinal hypomotility decreased from 86% pre-treatment to 50% post-treatment (p = 0.061). Severe gastrointestinal hypomotility decreased from 64 to 21% (p = 0.031). Subjective reporting of constipation did not correlate well with objective hypomotility, and did not change significantly with treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treating clozapine-treated patients with docusate and senna augmented by macrogol appears effective in reducing CTTs in clozapine-induced constipation. Randomised controlled trials are the next step. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616001405404 (registered retrospectively).

Digestion-resistant maltodextrin effects on colonic transit time and stool weight: a randomized controlled clinical study

PURPOSE

Increased awareness of the importance of dietary fibre has led to increased interest in "functional" fibre components like digestion-resistant maltodextrin (RMD). This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study assessed the effects of RMD in the colonic transit time (CTT) and defecation characteristics (frequency, stool volume and consistency).

METHODS

Sixty-six healthy adult volunteers (32 men) who did not have a daily defecation habit had a 7-day run-in period before the 21-day intervention period with RMD or placebo. CTT and segmental CTT (SCTT) were assessed by a single abdominal X-ray film taken at the end of both periods after radiopaque marker ingestion. Defecation characteristics and intestinal functions were also assessed, which were self-reported by patients. Intragroup comparisons were evaluated by Student's paired t test, Bonferroni test and Chi-square test, while time comparisons by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-by-treatment interaction by repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven subjects were assessed for CTT (placebo, n = 28; RMD, n = 29). In the RMD group, the total CTT, left SCTT and rectosigmoidal SCTT decreased significantly compared to baseline (p < 0.01 each; -13.3, -4.7, -8.7 h, respectively). Significant differences between groups were observed in total CTT and left SCTT. Significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed in the RMD group for stool volume (p = 0.014), increasing 56 % compared to baseline (p < 0.01), while remained unchanged in the placebo group. Stool consistency was improved only in the RMD group (p < 0.01). No adverse effects related to study products were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that RMD improved CTT, stool volume, stool consistency and some intestinal functions in a healthy population.

Childhood constipation: finally something is moving!

Recent developments in the evaluation and treatment of childhood constipation are likely to influence the way we deal with pediatric defecation disorders in the near future. Innovations in both colonic and anorectal manometry are leading to novel insights into functional defecation disorders in children. Promising results have been achieved with innovative therapies such as electrical stimulation and new drugs with targets that differ from conventional pharmacological treatments. Also, new surgical approaches, guided by manometric findings, have led to improvement in patient outcome. Finally, utilization of non-pharmacological interventions such as fiber and probiotics has been a field of particular interest in recent years. The aim of this article is to provide an update on these and other novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools related to childhood constipation.

Randomized clinical trial: efficacy of a food supplement, TRANSITECH, on healthy individuals with mild intermittent constipation

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common disorder in the general population and can be observed in healthy individuals. A natural product leading to an increase in bowel movements and decrease in colonic transit time (CTT), without bloating, could be useful for the patient's care.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of TRANSITECH, a food supplement composed of plants and lactic ferments, on bowel movements, CTT and bloating.

METHODS

A total of 100 healthy participants, presenting two to five stools per week, were selected and followed over a 6-day baseline period. They were randomly assigned to receive daily two tablets of TRANSITECH or placebo during 10 days. They were then followed up over 28 days after intervention. Participants daily recorded in a home questionnaire the characteristics of stools (frequency and consistency), and the importance of bloating during the preintervention period (from D-6 to D0), the intervention period (from D0 to D10) and the postintervention period (from D10 to D38). Their CTTs were also evaluated by following the propagation of radiopaque markers at D0 and D10.

RESULTS

At D10, the food supplement group showed, compared with the placebo group, higher daily stool emission (0.95±0.50, 0.70±0.20, P<0.001), softer stool consistency (2.5±0.6 vs. 3.0±0.8, P<0.001) and lower CTT (33.8±28.2 vs. 56.4±36.2 h, P=0.01). The active group also showed a sustained increase in daily stool emissions observed at D38 compared with D0 (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

TRANSITECH is an efficient natural solution for the treatment of constipation. It increases the number of bowel movements, decreases the oroanal and segmental CTT, is well tolerated, and presents sustained effects after treatment completion.

Functional Defecation Disorders and Excessive Body Weight: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Several studies have suggested an association between functional defecation disorders (FDDs) and overweight/obesity in children.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize current evidence evaluating the association between FDDs and overweight/obesity in children.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched from inception until January 25, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective and cross-sectional studies investigating the association between FDDs and overweight/obesity in children 0 to 18 years were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data generation was performed independently by 2 authors and quality was assessed by using quality assessment tools from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included: 2 studies evaluating the prevalence of FDDs in obese children, 3 studies evaluating the prevalence of overweight/obesity in children with FDDs, and 3 population-based studies. Both studies in obesity clinics revealed a higher prevalence of functional constipation (21%-23%) compared with the general population (3%-16%). In 3 case-control studies, the prevalence of overweight (12%-33%) and obesity (17%-20%) was found to be higher in FDD patients compared with controls (13%-23% and 0%-12%, respectively), this difference was significant in 2/3 studies. One of 3 population-based studies revealed evidence for an association between FDDs and overweight/obesity. Quality of 7/8 studies was rated fair or poor.

LIMITATIONS

Due to heterogeneity of the study designs, we refrained from statistically pooling.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several studies have revealed the potential association between FDDs and excessive bodyweight in children, results across included studies in this review differ strongly and are conflicting. Therefore, this systematic review could not confirm or refute this association.

How to use a plain abdominal radiograph in children with functional defecation disorders

Defecation-related functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), such as infant dyschezia, functional constipation and functional non-retentive faecal incontinence, as defined by the Rome IV criteria, are common problems in childhood. The symptomatology varies from relatively mild, such as crying before passage of soft stools or infrequent defecation to severe problems with faecal impaction and the daily involuntary loss of faeces in the underwear. Conventional radiography is widely available, relatively cheap and is non-invasive. The drawback however, is radiation exposure. This review describes and evaluates the value of different existing scoring methods to assess faecal loading on an abdominal radiograph with or without the use of radio-opaque markers, to measure colonic transit time, in the diagnosis of these defecation-related FGIDs. Insufficient evidence exists for a diagnostic association between clinical symptoms of functional constipation or functional nonretentive faecal incontinence and faecal loading on an abdominal radiograph. Furthermore, evidence does not support the routine use of colonic transit studies to diagnose functional constipation. Colonic transit time measurement may be considered in discriminating between functional constipation and functional non-retentive faecal incontinence and in patients in which the diagnosis is not clear such as having an unreliable medical history. In children with the suspicion of defecation-related FGIDs, the diagnosis should be made based on the Rome IV criteria.

Differential Proteomics Analysis of Colonic Tissues in Patients of Slow Transit Constipation

Objective. To investigate and screen the different expression of proteins in STC and normal group with a comparative proteomic approach. Methods. Two-dimensional electrophoresis was applied to separate the proteins in specimens from both 5 STC patients and 5 normal controls. The proteins with statistically significant differential expression between two groups were identified by computer aided image analysis and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization tandem time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Results. A total of 239 protein spots were identified in the average gel of the normal control and 215 in patients with STC. A total of 197 protein spots were matched and the mean matching rate was 82%. There were 14 protein spots which were expressed with statistically significant differences from others. Of those 14 protein spots, the expression of 12 spots increased markedly, while that of 2 spots decreased significantly. Conclusion. The proteomics expression in colonic specimens of STC patients is statistically significantly different from that of normal control, which may be associated with the pathogenesis of STC.

Clozapine-treated Patients Have Marked Gastrointestinal Hypomotility, the Probable Basis of Life-threatening Gastrointestinal Complications: A Cross Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal side effects are particularly common with clozapine and occur with other antipsychotics, ranging from mild constipation to fatal bowel obstruction and/or ischemia. While this adverse-effect spectrum has been attributed to 'gastrointestinal hypomotility', gastrointestinal transit times in antipsychotic-treated patients have not previously been measured, making this mechanism speculative.

METHODS

Using standardized radiopaque marker ('Metcalf') methods we established colonic transit times of antipsychotic-treated psychiatric inpatients and compared them with population normative values. We analyzed results by antipsychotic type, antipsychotic dose equivalent, anticholinergic load, duration of treatment, gender, ethnicity, and age.

OUTCOMES

For patients not prescribed clozapine, median colonic transit time was 23 h. For patients prescribed clozapine, median transit time was 104.5 h, over four times longer than those on other antipsychotics or normative values (p < 0.0001). Eighty percent of clozapine-treated patients had colonic hypomotility, compared with none of those prescribed other antipsychotics (olanzapine, risperidone, paliperidone aripiprazole, zuclopenthixol or haloperidol). In the clozapine group, right colon, left colon and rectosigmoid transit times were all markedly abnormal suggesting pan-colonic pathology. Hypomotility occurred irrespective of gender, age, ethnicity, or length of clozapine treatment. Transit times were positively correlated with clozapine plasma level (rho = 0.451, p = 0.045), but not with duration of treatment, total antipsychotic load or demographic factors.

INTERPRETATION

Clozapine, unlike the other antipsychotics examined, causes marked gastrointestinal hypomotility, as previously hypothesized. Pre-emptive laxative treatment is recommended when starting clozapine.

Difficult defecation in constipated patients and its relationship to colonic disorders

BACKGROUND

The importance in constipated subjects of having difficult defecation is poorly known. According to the Rome III criteria, constipated patients are classified as having either irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or functional constipation, depending on the presence and characteristics of abdominal pain. But, the Rome III criteria also identify another group of patients, labeled as suffering from functional anorectal disorders. Within this group, two complaints are akin to being constipated, but not labeled so: having dyssynergic defecation or inadequate defecation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to search for an association between difficult defecation and colonic transit abnormalities in constipated patients and, thus, shed some light on the definition of constipation according to the Rome III criteria.

PATIENTS

Four hundred four consecutive patients (81% female), aged 44.9 ± 16.6 years, with a BMI of 25.5 ± 6.4 kg/m(2) (mean ± SD), suffering from chronic constipation were included in the present study. After filling out a standard Rome III questionnaire, patients were classified as suffering from an irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or functional constipation. In addition, they were classified as complaining of difficult defecation or not. Patients completed the Bristol Stool Form Scale as well as visual analogue scales for constipation, bloating, and abdominal pain. The colonic transit time was measured using radiopaque markers and analyzed according to three sites: the right colon, the left colon, and the rectosigmoid area.

RESULTS

Difficult defecation is more frequent in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (84%) than in patients with functional constipation (68%). It is associated with an increase in constipation and abdominal pain scores on Likert scales, and a longer oroanal transit time, due to a delay in the left part of the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that difficult defecation is part of a more generalized colorectal dysfunction in both irritable bowel syndrome and in functional constipation patients with an overlap of symptomatology. It also demonstrates the relative inadequacy of the Rome III criteria to describe the relationship between constipation and difficult defecation.

Effect of Bowel Cleansing on Colonic Transit Time Measurement in Children with Chronic Constipation

We evaluated the effect of bowel preparation on colonic transit time (CTT) measured by the radio-opaque marker test in children with constipation. All children underwent 2 radio-opaque marker-CTT tests, both in cleansed and uncleansed bowel state. Our findings confirm that the state of colonic fecal filling may significantly influence CTT.

How many segments are necessary to characterize delayed colonic transit time?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Measuring colonic transit time with radiopaque markers is simple, inexpensive, and very useful in constipated patients. Yet, the algorithm used to identify colonic segments is subjective, rather than founded on prior experimentation. The aim of the present study is to describe a rational way to determine the colonic partition in the measurement of colonic transit time.

METHODS

Colonic transit time was measured in seven segments: ascending colon, hepatic flexure, right and left transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and rectosigmoid in 852 patients with functional bowel and anorectal disorders. An unsupervised algorithm for modeling Gaussian mixtures served to estimate the number of subgroups from this oversegmented colonic transit time. After that, we performed a k-means clustering that separated the observations into homogenous groups of patients according to their oversegmented colonic transit time.

RESULTS

The Gaussian mixture followed by the k-means clustering defined 4 populations of patients: "normal and fast transit" (n = 548) and three groups of patients with delayed colonic transit time "right delay" (n = 82) in which transit is delayed in the right part of the colon, "left delay" (n = 87) with transit delayed in the left part of colon and "outlet constipation" (n = 135) for patients with transit delayed in the terminal intestine. Only 3.7 % of patients were "erroneously" classified in the 4 groups recognized by clustering.

CONCLUSIONS

This unsupervised analysis of segmental colonic transit time shows that the classical division of the colon and the rectum into three segments is sufficient to characterize delayed segmental colonic transit time.

Total and Segmental Colon Transit Time Study in Functional Constipation: Comparison With Healthy Subjects

Background

Constipation is a common problem worldwide. Constipation can be primary or secondary. Primary constipation is subdivided in slow transit constipation, normal transit constipation, and dyssynergic defecation. Colon transit time (CTT) is the most basic and primary tool in evaluating disorders of colonic motility. CTT helps to differentiate between types of constipation and plan the treatment.

Methods

Fifty functional constipation patients and 25 healthy controls were asked to ingest four gelatin capsules (each containing five radio-opaque markers) at 0, 12 and 24 hours. An abdominal X-ray was taken at 36 hours. Total or segmental CTT was measured after calculating the number of markers remaining in each segment at 36 hours on abdominal X-ray.

Results

Mean CTT in healthy controls in our study was 15.4 hours which is shorter than western population. Total CTT is significantly higher in constipation group (23 hours) compared to healthy subjects (15.4 hours). Transit time in right segment was significantly high in constipation group than healthy population (14.2 vs. 8.3 hours). Total as well as segmental transit times are slightly higher in females as compared to males in both the groups, however not statistically significant. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies from India that compared the CTTs in functional constipation and healthy controls.

Conclusion

Radio-opaque marker study for CTT is a simple and reliable technique for evaluation of constipation. Patients with functional constipation have significantly longer CTT than healthy population. Total CTT is much less in this study population compared to west. There is need to establish standards for slow colon transit.

Effect of a new synbiotic supplement on symptoms, stool consistency, intestinal transit time and gut microbiota in patients with severe functional constipation: a pilot randomized double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Data on the benefits of synbiotics in functional constipation are conflicting. The aim of this study was to assess whether the administration of the synbiotic supplement Psyllogel Megafermenti(®) normalized stool consistency and decreased intestinal transit time (ITT) in patients with severe functional constipation, based on its ability to impact on the gut microbiota.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After a 2-week run-in period, patients from a tertiary care setting with severe functional constipation fulfilling the Rome III Diagnostic Criteria in the past year were randomly assigned to receive by mouth 2 bags/day of Psyllogel Megafermenti(®) (Group A) or 2.8 g of maltodextrin twice daily (Group B) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoints were increase of bowel evacuations with normal stool consistency and volume, and ITT reduction. Secondary endpoints included symptom improvement according to the Rome III Diagnostic Criteria, reduction of the Agachan-Wexner score and changes in gut microbiota composition.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients completed the study: 17 were allocated to Group A and 12 to Group B. A statistically significant increase in stools with normal consistency was observed only in Group A (p = 0.001), even when considering patients with normal stools ≤50 % of time at baseline. In Group A, a significant reduction in ITT was also found (p = 0.022). According to polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiling of stool samples, 50 % of the patients treated with synbiotics harbored all the probiotic species of the study product.

CONCLUSIONS

An 8-week treatment with Psyllogel Megafermenti(®) improved the main clinical parameters of functional constipation in patients extremely homogeneous for disorder severity and underlying pathophysiology ( Eudract.ema.europa.eu , No. 2008-000913-30).

Prucalopride improves bowel function and colonic transit time in patients with chronic constipation: an integrated analysis

OBJECTIVES

Constipation is often characterized by slow colonic transit, but the relationship between colonic transit time (CTT) and symptoms is unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of prucalopride, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor-4 agonist, on CTT and assess the relationship between CTT and symptoms.

METHODS

This was an integrated analysis of three randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 dose-finding trials of prucalopride in patients with chronic constipation (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00617513; NCT00631813; and NCT00596596). Measurements of CTT were analyzed using radio-opaque markers at the start and end (4 or 12 weeks) of treatment. At these visits, patients assessed the presence and severity of their symptoms.

RESULTS

In total, 280 patients had CTT measurements before and at the end of treatment and were included in the analysis. Their mean age was 43 years, 93% were women, and mean duration of constipation was 19 years. After a once daily treatment with prucalopride 2 mg (n=98) and 4 mg (n=70), CTT was reduced by 12.0 h (95% confidence interval (CI): -18.9, -5.1) and 13.9 h (95% CI: -20.5, -7.4), respectively; CTT increased by 0.5 h (95% CI: -4.5, 5.5) with placebo (n=112). At the end of the trial, symptoms including bloating/flatulence/distension and straining were rated as severe or very severe by a higher proportion of patients with slow or very slow CTT (>48 h) than by those with normal CTT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a clear relationship between increased CTT and increased symptom severity in patients with chronic constipation. Treatment with prucalopride accelerated CTT in these individuals.

Defaecography and colonic transit time for the evaluation of female patients with obstructed defaecation

PURPOSE

Colonic transit time and defaecography are well known, commonly used studies for evaluating patients with chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to compare colonic transit time with radiopaque markers and defaecography in female patients with obstructed defaecation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective observational study, between January 2010 and December 2012, a total of 30 female patients, mean age 60 years, with symptoms of obstructed defaecation were subjected to colonic transit time and defaecography, and divided into two groups: normal or abnormal colon transit time. The results were statistically compared using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

The comparison of data between colonic transit time and defaecography showed the following groups: group 1 (6/30 = 20 %) with normal colonic transit time but abnormal defaecography, and group 2 (24/30 = 80 %) with abnormal colonic transit time; the latter was further divided into two subgroups: group 2a (4/24 = 17 %), patients with inertia coli; group 2b (20/24 = 83 %), patients with impaired defaecation demonstrated at defaecography. There was a significant statistical difference between the radiological findings in these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the value of both defaecography and colonic transit time in assessing clinically obstructed women. Obstructed defaecation might not always be associated with abnormal colonic transit time. Likewise, not all constipated patients had signs of obstructed defaecation. The differential diagnosis between colonic slow transit constipation and constipation due to pelvic floor disorders is essential for an adequate strategy of care.

Dysmotility by mechanical bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol

BACKGROUND

The effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on morbidity (e.g., anastomotic leakage and surgical site infection) have been evaluated. Its effect on early recovery after surgery has drawn renewed attention, and its use is discouraged in the postsurgical management of enhanced recovery. However, most surgeons in Japan prefer polyethylene glycol (PEG) for MBP. We investigated the effect of MBP with PEG on postoperative intestinal motility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 258 colon cancer patients who underwent colonic resection and primary anastomosis. We orally administered 2000 mL of PEG in the PEG group and did not administer PEG to patients in the no-PEG group. Postoperative gastrointestinal motility was assessed with radiopaque markers. All patients ingested radiopaque markers 2 h before surgery. Postoperative intestinal motility was radiologically assessed by counting the number of residual markers. Abdominal radiography was conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 to count residual markers in the large and small intestines.

RESULTS

The total number of residual markers in the no-PEG group was less than that in the PEG group on day 5 (P < 0.01) but not on days 1 and 3. On all 3 d, the numbers of residual markers in the small intestine were significantly less in the no-PEG group than in the PEG group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complications between the no-PEG and PEG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG can negatively affect postoperative intestinal motility, and MBP using PEG is unnecessary in elective colon cancer surgery.

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome and constipation are more depressed than patients with functional constipation

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial factors, such as depression, have been shown to be associated with gastrointestinal disorders like constipation.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the depression and anxiety profiles of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation versus those of patients with functional constipation using validated questionnaires. Subjects rated the intensity of digestive symptoms experienced during the previous month using visual analogue scales. Colonic transit time measurements and anorectal manometry were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 128 consecutive, constipated patients included (84% females, mean age 49.7 ± 15.5 years) 66 suffered from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and 62 from functional constipation. Demographic and physiological traits were similar in the two groups. Patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation reported higher depression scores (18.8 ± 1.4 vs 12.7 ± 1.3, P=0.002) and higher symptom intensity scores for constipation (6.2 ± 0.3 vs 4.3 ± 0.4, P<0.001), bloating (6.7 ± 0.3 vs 3.3 ± 0.4, P<0.001) and abdominal pain (6.0 ± 0.3 vs 2.7 ± 0.4, P<0.001) than patients with functional constipation. Multiple linear regression showed positive correlations between symptom intensity and depression and anxiety scores for functionally constipated patients only.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the integration of a psychosocial component to the traditional treatment of constipated patients; however, further research exploring causality between psychosocial factors and specific gastrointestinal disorders would contribute to developing a tailored therapeutic approach.

Treatment of refractory irritable bowel syndrome with visceral osteopathy: short-term and long-term results of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

In light of the low efficiency of available drugs in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), there has been a growing interest in its alternative therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of visceral osteopathy for IBS.

METHODS

In total, 31 consecutive refractory IBS patients were prospectively included in a randomized, crossover placebo-controlled study. Qualitative evaluation of depression and four symptoms including constipation, diarrhea, abdominal distension and abdominal pain before and after each phase of the study were conducted using visual analog scales, measures of rectal sensitivity and colonic transit time. One year after the study, the assessment of symptoms was performed again in all patients.

RESULTS

Visceral osteopathy was associated with a significant amelioration of self-reported diarrhea, abdominal distension and abdominal pain, while constipation did not change significantly after this therapy. It was also associated with decreased rectal sensitivity, presenting as an increase in threshold volume, constant sensation volume and maximum tolerable volume (P < 0.001). However, no significant evolution of rectal sensitivity was observed when patients underwent placebo manipulations. Modifications of depression and total or segmental colonic transit time were not observed. One year after the end of this trial, symptom scores of diarrhea, abdominal distension and abdominal pain were significantly lower than those at enrollment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that visceral osteopathy improves short-term and long-term abdominal distension and pain, and also decreases rectal sensitivity in IBS patients.

Colon transit time and anorectal manometry in children and young adults with spina bifida

PURPOSE

This study evaluates colon transit time (CTT) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in spina bifida (SB) patients in relation to the level of lesion, mobility, constipation, and continence status.

METHODS

SB patients between 6 and 19 years, who are not using antegrade continence enemas and followed at the SB Reference Centre UZ Ghent, were asked to participate. Medical history was retrospectively retrieved from the medical file. Stool habits were prospectively collected using standardized questionnaires. CTT was measured using the 6-day pellet abdominal X-ray method. ARM was performed in non-sedated children with a water-perfused, latex-free catheter.

RESULTS

Forty out of 52 eligible patients consented to perform CTT, of which 19 also performed the ARM. Fifteen (37 %) SB patients were constipated despite treatment. Twenty-six (65 %) were (pseudo) continent. The total CTT was significantly prolonged in SB patients (median CTT 86.4 vs. 36 h controls). The CTT was significantly prolonged in constipated SB patients compared to non-constipated SB patients (122.4 vs. 52.8 h). Spontaneously continent patients had a normal CTT (33.6 h) as well as a significantly higher resting pressure compared to the pseudo-continent and incontinent SB patients (resting pressure 56.5 vs. 32.5 mmHg). An abnormal CTT was associated with a treatment necessity to achieve pseudo-continence (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

CTT in SB patients was significantly prolonged, indicating a neurogenic involvement of the bowel and slow transit constipation. SB patients with a normal CTT and a normal ARM spontaneously achieved fecal continence. CTT can help tailor the continence therapy in SB patients.

Colonic electrical stimulation for the treatment of slow-transit constipation: a preliminary pilot study

BACKGROUND

Electrical stimulation of the gastrointestinal tract is an attractive concept. In this article we report on a procedure for electrical colonic pacing due to intramuscular electrode placement for slow-transit constipation and some preliminary results.

METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2012, all consecutive patients affected by constipation and evaluated in our Pelvic Floor Center were prospectively assessed. Patients who underwent colonic electrical stimulation were evaluated for the present study.

RESULTS

In the study period, 256 patients were evaluated for constipation; 58% were identified as having obstructed defecation syndrome, 27.3% with irritable bowel syndrome or mixed forms, 4% with pelvic floor dyssynergia, and 10.5% (27 patients) as having slow-transit constipation. After failure of all the maximal conventional therapies, two patients, candidates for colectomy, agreed to undergo colonic electrical stimulation before a resective treatment. Both patients were females, aged 34 and 29 years, and were suffering from severe constipation since childhood. The follow-up was 19 and 6 months. The number of bowel movements per week increased from 0.3 to 3.5 in the first patient and from 0.5 to 2.5 in the second patient. Both patients no longer needed laxatives, enemas, or any other treatment. The hospital stay was 4 days, the mean operative time was 120 min, and no complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic pacing seems to be feasible and shows positive results. Further studies are required with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period to confirm the role of this promising treatment for slow-transit constipation.

Objective assessment of postoperative gastrointestinal motility in elective colonic resection using a radiopaque marker provides an evidence for the abandonment of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has no benefit in terms of anastomotic healing, infection rate, or improvement in the postoperative course in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, and that it should be abandoned. However, the effect of MBP on postoperative gastrointestinal motility has been assessed subjectively. In this randomized trial, we objectively assessed the effect of MBP on postoperative gastrointestinal motility and mobility in elective colonic resection.

METHOD

In total, 79 patients scheduled to undergo elective colonic resection for cancer were randomized to MBP or no-MBP groups prior to surgery. All patients ingested radiopaque markers before surgery to evaluate postoperative gastrointestinal motility, objectively evaluated by the transition of the markers at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 5 and 7. The groups were then further subdivided into open and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) groups and evaluated in terms of gastrointestinal motility and postoperative mobility.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the no-MBP and MBP groups in terms of perioperative and postoperative course. In the LAC subgroup, there was no significant difference between the no-MBP and MBP groups in terms of marker transition. However, in the open subgroup, there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of the residual ratio of markers in the small intestine at POD 3 (no-MBP 35.3% vs. MBP 69.2%; p=0.041), excretion rate of markers at POD 5 (no-MBP 49.7% vs. MBP 8.8%; p=0.005), and residual ratio in the small intestine at POD 7 (no-MBP 3.1% vs. MBP 28.8%; p=0.028). Additionally, the excretion rate in the no-MBP group was significantly higher than in the MBP group at POD 7 (74.1% vs. 33.8%; p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide additional evidence to support the abandonment of MBP in elective open colonic surgery.

Functional nonretentive fecal incontinence: do enemas help?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current treatment of functional nonretentive fecal incontinence, which consists of education, toilet training, and positive motivation.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients, age 6 years and older, referred for fecal incontinence (FI) and diagnosed with functional nonretentive fecal incontinence were eligible candidates. Seventy-one children (76% boys, median age 9.3 years) were randomized to receive conventional therapy (control group) or conventional therapy in addition to daily enemas during 2 weeks. Treatment success was defined as <2 episodes of FI/month without use of enemas.

RESULTS

At intake, the median FI frequency was 6.1 per week, whereas the median defecation frequency was 7.0 per week. At the end of the treatment period, the median number of FI episodes was significantly decreased in both groups: from 7.0 (IQR 4.0-11.5) to 1.0 (IQR 0.5-2.0) in the intervention group and from 6.0 (IQR 4.0-10) to 2.0 (IQR 0.5-3.5) in the control group. No statistical difference was found between the groups at the end of the treatment period (P = .08) nor during additional follow-up (average success rate 17% for both groups, P = .99).

CONCLUSION

Temporarily application of additional rectal enemas did not significantly improve treatment success compared with conventional therapy alone.