Complications of rubber band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids

Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation. Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of case notes was performed in a colorectal surgery department that sits alongside a tertiary cardiothoracic surgical unit. Patients treated with an IST for SH between 1 April 2014 and 30 November 2021 were identified. Anticoagulation was not stopped in these patients as they were at high risk of developing thromboembolism, except in two patients who required alternative procedures. The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported complications, number of IST procedures and number of other procedures performed to achieve symptom resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 35-86, 14 male) who underwent 32 IST treatments were identified. Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment, with two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions. Ten patients (50%) required only one IST procedure, and three patients (15%) required two procedures. The remaining five (25%) patients required three or four interventions. The median time between IST treatments was 32 weeks (range 8-133). No complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that IST can be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with SH who are at a high risk of thromboembolic disease requiring anticoagulation.

Outcomes of Rubber Band Ligation in Haemorrhoids Among Outdoor Patients

Background: Out of all anorectal diseases, haemorrhoids are the most common benign disease. Haemorrhoids can be treated by various treatment modalities like medical, surgical, and instrumental. Instrumental treatment comprises rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and infrared and laser therapy. Out of these modalities, the rubber band ligation technique is the least invasive with a reduced rate of complications and without the need for hospitalization. Hence, the current study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes with respect to the effectiveness of rubber band ligation in grade II and III internal haemorrhoids along with the magnitude and pattern of post-procedural complications.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study, conducted on a sample of 100 patients who presented to our outdoor patient’s department and were diagnosed with haemorrhoids, either grade II or III. All enrolled study patients having haemorrhoids were banded with rubber band by Barron Ligator (Precise, Canada) with local anaesthetic agent xylocaine jelly in a single session. All patients were followed on the 10th day, 1st month, and 6th month after the procedure to assess symptomatic improvement. The endpoint of this study is to know the effectiveness of rubber band ligation in different clinical parameters such as post-ligation pain or discomfort, the requirement of analgesic, any complication, and time off work.

Results: Out of 100 patients 17 patients had grade II and 83 patients had grade III haemorrhoids. Among them, 89% were symptomatically relieved after rubber band ligation whereas the rest 11% of patients had residual symptoms.

Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that rubber band ligation for grade II and III haemorrhoids is simple, safer, easy-to-perform daycare procedure with lesser requirements of analgesics and without any need for anaesthesia.

Massive gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopic rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids: A case report

BACKGROUND

Rubber band ligation (RBL) using rigid anoscope is a commonly recommended therapy for grade I-III symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Severe complications of RBL include pain, hemorrhage and sepsis. Flexible endoscopic RBL (ERBL) is now more commonly used in RBL therapy but few severe complications have been reported. Here we report on a case of massive bleeding after ERBL.

CASE SUMMARY

A 31-year-old female was admitted to the department of gastroenterology with a chief complaint of discontinuous hematochezia for 2 years. No previous history, accompanying diseases or drug use was reported. Physical examination and colonoscopy showed grade II internal hemorrhoids. The patient received ERBL therapy. Five days after ligation, the patient presented with mild hematochezia. On days 7 and 9 after ligation, she presented with a large amount of rectal bleeding, dizziness and weakness. Emergency colonoscopy revealed active bleeding and an ulcer in the anal wound. The patient received two sessions of hemoclipping on days 7 and 9 to treat the bleeding. No further bleeding was reported up to day 15 and she was discharged home. Although the hemorrhoid prolapse disappeared after ERBL, she was dissatisfied with the subsequent complications.

CONCLUSION

ERBL therapy is an effective treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids with satisfactory short and long-term recovery. Pain and anal bleeding are the most frequently reported postoperative complications. Coagulation disorders complicate the increased risk of bleeding. Although rarely reported, our case reminds us that those patients without coagulation disorders are also at risk of massive life-threatening bleeding and need strict follow-up after ligation.

Drug-Eluting Rubber Bands for Tissue Ligation

Rubber band ligation is a commonly used method for the removal of tissue abnormalities. Most often, rubber band ligation is performed to remove internal hemorrhoids unresponsive to first line treatments to avoid surgery. While the procedure is considered safe, patients experience mild to significant pain and discomfort until the tissue sloughs off. As patients often require multiple bandings and sessions, reducing these side effects can have a considerable effect on patient adherence and quality of life. To reduce pain and discomfort, we developed drug-eluting rubber bands for ligation procedures. We investigated the potential for a band to elute anesthetics and drug combinations to durably manage pain for a period of up to 5 days while exhibiting similar mechanical properties to conventional rubber bands. We show that the rubber bands retain their mechanical properties despite significant drug loading. Lidocaine, released from the bands, successfully altered the calcium dynamics of cardiomyocytes in vitro and modulated heart rate in zebrafish embryos, while the bands exhibited lower cytotoxicity than conventional bands. Ex vivo studies demonstrated substantial local drug release in enteric tissues. These latex-free bands exhibited sufficient mechanical and drug-eluting properties to serve both ligation and local analgesic functions, potentially enabling pain reduction for multiple indications.

Sclerobanding (Combined Rubber Band Ligation with 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy) for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease: Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sclerobanding is a novel technique combining rubber band ligation with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (HD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and short-term outcomes of sclerobanding in the treatment of second- and third-degree HD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of second- and third-degree HD cases from November 2017 to August 2021 was performed. Patients on anticoagulants or with other HD degrees were excluded. Follow-up was conducted at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and then every 12 months.

RESULTS

97 patients with second- (20 pts; 20.6%) and third-degree (77 pts; 79.4%) HD with a mean age of 52 years (20-84; SD ± 15.5) were included. Fifty-six patients were men (57.7%) and forty-one women (42.3%). Median follow-up was 13 months (1-26 months). No intraoperative adverse events or drug-related side effects occurred. Minor complications occurred in four patients (4.1%) in the first 30 postoperative days and all resolved after conservative treatment at the 3-month follow-up visit. No mortality or readmissions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerobanding is a safe technique with a low rate of minor postoperative complications. Further studies on larger samples are necessary to establish the effectiveness and long-term outcomes of the technique.

Rubber band ligation of symptomatic hemorrhoids: an old solution to an everyday problem

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study is to present the results of rubber band ligation (RBL) in 2635 consecutive patients with 2^nd, 3^rd, and 4^th degree symptomatic hemorrhoids, the pain risk factors, and the applicability of the method in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 1256 patients with 2^nd, 1159 with 3^rd, and 220 with 4^th degree hemorrhoids were included in the study. Fifty-seven patients with hemorrhoids had liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. RBL was performed using St Marks', McGinvey, and suction ligators. Single ligation was done in 178 patients, while 2457 patients had synchronous multiple ligations, in one (272), two (1289), and three (896 patients) sessions.

RESULTS

After the end of treatment, 86.8% of our patients were asymptomatic and 84.5% remained asymptomatic 2 years later. A total of 593 patients had complications. Thirty required hospitalization, while pain was the most frequent complication (16.16 %). Multiple banding, young age, male sex, and external hemorrhoids were pain risk factors. RBL proved to be safe in 57 patients with coagulation disorders due to cirrhosis. Symptomatic recurrence was detected in 327 out of 2110 patients (15.49%), with repeat RBL in 219 cases and surgery in 108 cases.

CONCLUSION

RBL is a safe, effective method for treating symptomatic 2^nd and 3^rd degree hemorrhoids. It can also be applied in selected cases of 4^th degree hemorrhoids and patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

A prospective study of efficacy and safety of rubber band ligation in the treatment of Grade II and III hemorrhoids – a western Indian experience

Background Hemorrhoids are one of the most frequent diseases of the anal region with high prevalence involving all age groups. Multiple treatment options exist with none being perfect. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids is a non-operative treatment which can be performed on outpatient basis.

Objective The study was undertaken to determine efficacy of banding in treatment of Grade II and III hemorrhoids and to follow-up patients treated by banding to evaluate for symptomatic relief, recurrence and complications.

Study design A prospective, interventional study with clearance from the institutional ethics committee was undertaken over the period of 2 years in a tertiary referral center with a sample size of 60.

Result Out of 60 patients, 41 patients (68.30%) had Grade II and 19 patients (31.7%) had Grade III hemorrhoids. At first follow up, success rate for Grade II hemorrhoids was 85% (35/41) as compared to 21% (4/19) in Grade III. The unsuccessful 20 patients were re-banded, however only 2 of them responded to procedure. At the end of 6 weeks, 36 patients with Grade II hemorrhoids (88%) were cured. Failure rate was higher for Grade III hemorrhoids (68.42%, n = 13). Success rate was 86.6% for single hemorrhoid. There were no major complications. Anemia reverted significantly with successful band ligation.

Conclusion Rubber band ligation is a simple, safe and effective method for treating symptomatic second and third degree hemorrhoids as an outpatient procedure. It gives better results for Grade II and single hemorrhoids. Recurrence rate after successful band ligation is low.

Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a frequent health problem with considerable repercussions on patients' quality of life. However, much of the clinical practice related to HD is based on knowledge without scientific evidence and supported largely by empirical experience of the physician who deals with this pathology. As in other countries, the goal of this consensus is to establish statements supported by solid scientific evidence and whose purpose will be to standardize and guide the diagnosis and management of HD both in the general population and in some particular groups of patients.

Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common proctological disease in the Western countries. However, its real prevalence is underestimated due to the frequent self-medication.The aim of this consensus statement is to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of HD. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE.These guidelines are inclusive and not prescriptive.The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by American College of Chest Physicians. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C.

A comparative study between rubber band ligation and local application of herbal caustic compound (pratisaraneeya kshara) in management of internal haemorrhoids

•

Application of PK is a safe and effective treatment for internal haemorrhoids.

•

Hospital stay is not required for patients undergoing this treatment.

•

Post-operative analgesia is not required in most of the cases.

•

It proved better in eradicating large and broad based pile mass than RBL.

•

It can be employed as alternative office procedure for management of haemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoid Banding: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoid banding is an established treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids with proven efficacy, low cost, and limited discomfort. Although the costs and quality of life following individual banding treatments have been investigated, little is known about cumulative cost and quality of life from sequential banding therapy or how these cumulative costs compare to surgical therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of sequential hemorrhoid banding therapy.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of historic banding treatment patterns was performed. Cost estimates and quality-of-life predictions were applied to observed treatment patterns in a decision-analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare sequential banding therapy with hypothetical surgical intervention.

SETTING

A retrospective billing record review for patients treated in a colorectal specialty clinic between 2012 and 2017 was performed.

PATIENTS

Patients initially treated with banding therapy for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcomes measured were hemorrhoid banding treatment patterns, cost-effectiveness, and net monetary benefit.

RESULTS

Treatment of 2026 patients undergoing hemorrhoid banding identified 94% resolution with sequential banding and 6% requiring delayed surgical intervention. Average cumulative estimated cost for banding therapy was $723 (range, $382-$4430) per patient with an average quality-of-life deficit of -0.00234 (range, -0.00064 to -0.02638) quality-adjusted life-years. Estimates for hypothetical hemorrhoid artery ligation, stapled hemorrhoidopexy, or surgical hemorrhoidectomy found significantly higher cost (3.15×, 4.39×, and 2.75× more expensive) and a significantly worse quality-of-life deficit (1.55×, 5.64×, and 9.45× worse). For patients with persistent disease, continued sequential banding remained the dominant cost-effective therapy.

LIMITATIONS

This cost-effectiveness model relies on a retrospective review of billing records with estimated cost and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhoid banding is a valuable treatment modality with favorable cost-effectiveness. The majority of patients selected for banding find resolution without surgery. For patients with persistent disease, further banding procedures remain cost-effective compared with delayed surgical therapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A982.

BANDA HEMORROIDAL

UN ANÁLISIS DE COSTO-EFECTIVIDAD: La banda para hemorroides es un tratamiento establecido para las hemorroides internas sintomáticas con eficacia comprobada, bajo costo y malestar limitado. Si bien se han investigado los costos y la calidad de vida después de los tratamientos de bandas individuales, se sabe poco sobre el costo acumulativo y la calidad de vida de la terapia de bandas secuencial o cómo estos costos acumulativos se comparan con la terapia quirúrgica.

OBJETIVO

Determinar el costo-efectividad de la terapia secuencial de bandas hemorroidales. DISEÑO:: Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de la historia de los patrones de tratamiento con bandas. Las estimaciones de costos y las predicciones de la calidad de vida se aplicaron a los patrones de tratamiento observados en un modelo analítico de costo-efectividad para comparar la terapia de bandas secuencial con la intervención quirúrgica hipotética.

AJUSTE

Revisión retrospectiva de los registros de facturación de los pacientes tratados en una clínica de especialidad colorrectal entre 2012 y 2017.

PACIENTES

Pacientes tratados inicialmente con terapia de bandas para hemorroides internas sintomáticas.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO

Patrones de tratamiento con bandas de hemorroides, costo-efectividad y beneficio monetario neto.

RESULTADOS

El tratamiento de 2026 pacientes con bandas identificó una resolución del 94% con bandas secuenciales y el 6% requirió una intervención quirúrgica tardía. El costo promedio acumulado estimado para la terapia de banda fue de $ 723 (Rango: $382-$4430) por paciente con un déficit de calidad de vida promedio de -0.00234 (Rango: -0.00064 a -0.02638) años de vida ajustados por calidad. Las estimaciones para la hipotética ligadura de la arteria hemorroidal, la hemorroidopexia con grapas o la hemorroidectomía quirúrgica encontraron un costo significativamente mayor (3.15×, 4.39×, 2.75× más caro) y un déficit de la calidad de vida significativamente peor (1.55×, 5.64×, 9.45× peor). Para los pacientes con enfermedad persistente, la colocación de bandas secuenciales continuas siguió siendo la terapia rentable dominante.

LIMITACIONES

Este modelo de costo-efectividad se basa en una revisión retrospectiva de los registros de facturación con el costo y la calidad de vida estimados.

CONCLUSIONES

Las bandas de hemorroides son una valiosa modalidad de tratamiento con una favorable relación costo-efectividad. La mayoría de los pacientes seleccionados para terapia con bandas encuentran resolución sin cirugía. Para los pacientes con enfermedad persistente, los procedimientos de colocación de bandas adicionales siguen siendo rentables en comparación con el tratamiento quirúrgico tardío. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A982.

THE RUSSIAN ASSOCIATION OF COLOPROCTOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDS

Collapse

Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) does not increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing rubber band ligation for symptomatic hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

The incidence of postprocedural bleeding in patients undergoing rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids while taking clopidogrel bisulfate is unknown. To determine the postprocedural bleeding risk of RBL for patients taking clopidogrel compared with age- and sex-matched controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case-controlled cohort study analyzing data from 2005 to 2013 conducted at a single tertiary care academic center. The study included a total of 80 rubber bands placed on 41 patients taking clopidogrel bisulfate and 72 bands placed on 41 control patients not taking clopidogrel matched for age and sex. The 30-d rates of significant and insignificant bleeding events after RBL were recorded. A bleeding event was considered significant if the patient required admission to the hospital, transfusion of blood products, or additional procedures to stop the bleeding. Insignificant bleeding was defined as passage of blood or clots per rectum with spontaneous cessation and no need for additional intervention.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the number of bleeding events per band placed in the clopidogrel group when compared with the control group (3.75% versus 2.78%, P = 0.7387). The rate of significant (2.5% versus 1.39%, P = 0.6244) and insignificant bleeding events (1.25% versus 1.39%, P = 0.9399) was also similar between the two groups. Two significant bleeding events occurred in the clopidogrel group requiring intervention: cauterization in one patient and colonoscopy and transfusion in the other.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of a bleeding complication after RBL for hemorrhoids does not appear to be increased in patients taking clopidogrel. Our results support the practice of continuing clopidogrel bisulfate in the periprocedural period as the associated risk of thrombosis is greater than the risk of bleeding.

The HubBLe Trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical intervention for low-grade haemorrhoids is unknown. Rubber band ligation (RBL) is probably the most common intervention. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) is a novel alternative that may be more efficacious.

OBJECTIVE

The comparison of HAL with RBL for the treatment of grade II/III haemorrhoids.

DESIGN

A multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial.

PERSPECTIVE

UK NHS and Personal Social Services.

SETTING

17 NHS Trusts.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years presenting with grade II/III (second- and third-degree) haemorrhoids, including those who have undergone previous RBL.

INTERVENTIONS

HAL with Doppler probe compared with RBL.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcome - recurrence at 1 year post procedure; secondary outcomes - recurrence at 6 weeks; haemorrhoid severity score; European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L); Vaizey incontinence score; pain assessment; complications; and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 370 participants entered the trial. At 1 year post procedure, 30% of the HAL group had evidence of recurrence compared with 49% after RBL [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 3.51; p = 0.0005]. The main reason for the difference was the number of extra procedures required to achieve improvement/cure. If a single HAL is compared with multiple RBLs then only 37.5% recurred in the RBL arm (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.15; p = 0.20). Persistence of significant symptoms at 6 weeks was lower in both arms than at 1 year (9% HAL and 29% RBL), suggesting significant deterioration in both groups over the year. Symptom score, EQ-5D-5L and Vaizey score improved in both groups compared with baseline, but there was no difference between interventions. Pain was less severe and of shorter duration in the RBL group; most of the HAL group who had pain had mild to moderate pain, resolving by 3 weeks. Complications were low frequency and not significantly different between groups. It appeared that HAL was not cost-effective compared with RBL. In the base-case analysis, the difference in mean total costs was £1027 higher for HAL. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were higher for HAL; however, the difference was very small (0.01) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £104,427 per additional QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year, although HAL resulted in fewer recurrences, recurrence was similar to repeat RBL. Symptom scores, complications, EQ-5D-5L and continence score were no different, and patients had more pain in the early postoperative period after HAL. HAL is more expensive and unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of incremental cost per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

Blinding of participants and site staff was not possible.

FUTURE WORK

The incidence of recurrence may continue to increase with time. Further follow-up would add to the evidence regarding long-term clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The polysymptomatic nature of haemorrhoidal disease requires a validated scoring system, and the data from this trial will allow further assessment of validity of such a system. These data add to the literature regarding treatment of grade II/III haemorrhoids. The results dovetail with results from the eTHoS study [Watson AJM, Hudson J, Wood J, Kilonzo M, Brown SR, McDonald A, et al. Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016, in press.] comparing stapled haemorrhoidectomy with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Combined results will allow expansion of analysis, allowing surgeons to tailor their treatment options to individual patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41394716.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 88. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: A guide for complications

Rubber band ligation is one of the most important, cost-effective and commonly used treatments for internal hemorrhoids. Different technical approaches were developed mainly to improve efficacy and safety. The technique can be employed using an endoscope with forward-view or retroflexion or without an endoscope, using a suction elastic band ligator or a forceps ligator. Single or multiple ligations can be performed in a single session. Local anaesthetic after ligation can also be used to reduce the post-procedure pain. Mild bleeding, pain, vaso-vagal symptoms, slippage of bands, priapism, difficulty in urination, anal fissure, and chronic longitudinal ulcers are normally considered minor complications, more frequently encountered. Massive bleeding, thrombosed hemorrhoids, severe pain, urinary retention needing catheterization, pelvic sepsis and death are uncommon major complications. Mild pain after rubber band ligation is the most common complication with a high frequency in some studies. Secondary bleeding normally occurs 10 to 14 d after banding and patients taking anti-platelet and/or anti-coagulant medication have a higher risk, with some reports of massive life-threatening haemorrhage. Several infectious complications have also been reported including pelvic sepsis, Fournier’s gangrene, liver abscesses, tetanus and bacterial endocarditis. To date, seven deaths due to these infectious complications were described. Early recognition and immediate treatment of complications are fundamental for a favourable prognosis.

Use of the over-the-scope clip to treat massive bleeding at the transitional zone of the anal canal: a case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic treatment of anorectal bleeding can be challenging. We report use of the endoscopic over-the-scope clip (OTSC) to treat massive bleeding from the transitional zone of the anorectum. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical outcome and efficacy of the OTSC and to describe the technique of its use in acute severe bleeding occurring at the transitional zone of the anorectum.

METHODS

We treated 5 consecutive patients (age range, 36-79 years, 5 men) with severe bleeding from the transitional zone of the anorectum caused by hemorrhoid therapy, digital trauma, and a Dieulafoy lesion. We analyzed the efficacy, safety, and outcome of endoscopic treatment using the OTSC.

RESULTS

Primary hemostasis was successfully achieved in all the patients using a single OTSC. The OTSC deployment technique was adapted from the endoscopic band ligation of hemorrhoids. There was no immediate or late rebleeding. We observed that there were no adverse events from OTSC placement in the anorectum.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series provides evidence that OTSCs may be effective in controlling bleeding from the transitional zone of the anorectum. Although use of OTSCs for bleeding elsewhere in the GI tract has been described, this case series is the first to show its application in the transitional zone of the anorectum.

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD): a safe procedure for the anticoagulated patient?

Background

Approximately one in five persons living in the USA is maintained on oral anticoagulation. It has typically been recommended that anticoagulation be withheld prior to hemorrhoidal procedures. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic hemorrhoids, and outcomes with patients on anticoagulation who have undergone this procedure have not been previously reported. Here, we report our preliminary results of patients who underwent THD while on anticoagulation.

Methods

During a 53-month period (February 2009–July 2015), patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids refractory to medical management who underwent surgical treatment with THD were retrospectively reviewed. The subset of patients who underwent THD while anticoagulated was compared to a cohort of patient who were not taking anticoagulation and who otherwise demonstrated normal coagulation profiles and who did not have a known predisposition to bleeding or inherited coagulopathy. The primary study endpoint was to assess postoperative bleeding in patients who were maintained on anticoagulation before and after surgery.

Results

During the 53-month study period, 106 patients underwent the THD procedure for symptomatic hemorrhoids. Of these, seventy patients underwent THD without anticoagulation therapy, while 36 patients underwent THD while taking one or more oral anticoagulants. The postoperative morbidity between the two cohorts was similar, and specifically there was no statistical difference in the rate of postoperative hemorrhage (19.4 vs. 15.7 %; odds ratio 1.295, 95 % CI 0.455–3.688, p = 0.785). No patient, in either cohort, required re-intervention for any reason during the study period. Patients who underwent THD while on anticoagulation were less likely to have recurrent hemorrhoidal disease during the study’s 6-month median follow-up period (2.8 vs. 7.1 %, p = 0.049).

Conclusions

These preliminary data reveal that THD can be performed on anticoagulated patients without cessation of oral agents without increasing morbidity from postoperative bleeding.

Local anaesthetic infiltration for the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this article is to systematically analyse the randomized, controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of local anaesthetic infiltration prior to the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids. Published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of local anaesthetic (LA) versus no-local anaesthetic (NLA) for the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids were analysed using RevMan®, and the combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Four randomized, controlled trials evaluating 387 patients were retrieved from the standard electronic databases. The risk of treatment failure (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.07, 2.79; z = 0.87; p = 0.39) and post-procedure complications (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.08, 2.76; z = 0.83; p = 0.41) was similar between two techniques. However, the post-procedure pain score (SMD -5.19; 95% CI -9.08, -1.30; z = 2.62; p < 0.009) was significantly lower in the group of patients undergoing rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids under local anaesthetic injection. The use of LA appears to have clinically measurable advantages over NLA in the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic haemorrhoids to lessen post-procedure pain.

Rectal ulcers and massive bleeding after hemorrhoidal band ligation while on aspirin

Endoscopic hemorrhoidal band ligation is a well-established nonoperative method for treatment of bleeding internal hemorrhoids (grade 1 to 3). It is a safe and effective technique with a high success rate. Complications with this procedure are uncommon. Although rectal ulceration due to band ligation is a rare complication, it can cause life-threatening hemorrhage especially when patients are on medications which impair hemostasis like aspirin or non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We present 2 cases of massive lower gastro-intestinal bleeding in patients who had a band ligation procedure performed 2 wk prior to the presentation and were on aspirin at home. Both the patients were hemodynamically unstable requiring resuscitation. They required platelet and blood transfusions and were found to have rectal ulcers on colonoscopy done subsequently. The rectal ulcers corresponded to the site of band ligation. The use of aspirin by these patients would have caused defects in the hemostasis and may have predisposed them to massive bleeding in the presence of rectal ulcers occurring after the band ligation procedure. Managing aspirin before and after the ligation may be difficult especially since adequate guidelines are unavailable. Stopping aspirin in all the cases might not be safe and the decision should be individualized.

The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids

Background

Haemorrhoids (piles) are a very common condition seen in surgical clinics. After exclusion of more sinister causes of haemorrhoidal symptoms (rectal bleeding, perianal irritation and prolapse), the best option for treatment depends upon persistence and severity of the symptoms. Minor symptoms often respond to conservative treatment such as dietary fibre and reassurance. For more severe symptoms treatment such as rubber band ligation may be therapeutic and is a very commonly performed procedure in the surgical outpatient setting. Surgery is usually reserved for those who have more severe symptoms, as well as those who do not respond to non-operative therapy; surgical techniques include haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy. More recently, haemorrhoidal artery ligation has been introduced as a minimally invasive, non destructive surgical option.

There are substantial data in the literature concerning efficacy and safety of 'rubber band ligation including multiple comparisons with other interventions, though there are no studies comparing it to haemorrhoidal artery ligation. A recent overview has been carried out by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence which concludes that current evidence shows haemorrhoidal artery ligation to be a safe alternative to haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy though it also highlights the lack of good quality data as evidence for the advantages of the technique.

Methods/design

The aim of this study is to establish the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of haemorrhoidal artery ligation compared with conventional rubber band ligation in the treatment of people with symptomatic second or third degree (Grade II or Grade III) haemorrhoids.

Design: A multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial.

Outcomes: The primary outcome is patient-reported symptom recurrence twelve months following the intervention. Secondary outcome measures relate to symptoms, complications, health resource use, health related quality of life and cost effectiveness following the intervention.

Participants: 350 patients with grade II or grade III haemorrhoids will be recruited in surgical departments in up to 14 NHS hospitals.

Randomisation: A multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Block randomisation by centre will be used, with 175 participants randomised to each group.

Discussion

The results of the research will help inform future practice for the treatment of grade II and III haemorrhoids.

Trial Registration

ISRCTN41394716

New bipolar tissue ligator combines constant tissue compression and temperature guidance: histologic study and implications for treatment of hemorrhoids

Background

Several minimally invasive technologies are available to treat common soft tissue lesions including symptomatic hemorrhoids. The use of energy to deliver heat and coagulate target lesions is commonly practiced. This study compares the histologic effects produced on intestinal tissues by two energy-based systems which employ different approaches of heat delivery.

Methods

Two heat delivery systems were evaluated in vivo in a single porcine subject: infrared coagulator and bipolar tissue ligator utilizing constant tissue compression and temperature guidance. Eighteen treatment sites divided into three groups of six were assessed. Treatment site temperature was measured and the effects of thermal treatment in the mucosa, submucosa, submucosal vessels, and muscularis layer were scored. Lateral thermal spread beyond the energy application site was also assessed.

Results

Treatment site temperatures were much lower in the bipolar ligator group than in the infrared coagulator group. The mucosal and submucosal tissue changes observed in tissues treated with infrared energy and bipolar energy at 55°C were similar. Both the mucosal and submucosal tissue changes with bipolar energy at 50°C were significantly less.

Conclusion

Both devices achieved similar histologic results. However, the unique design of the bipolar ligator, which allows consistent capture, constant compression, and temperature monitoring of target tissue, accomplished the desired histologic changes with less muscular damage at much lower temperatures than the infrared coagulator. The use of bipolar ligation could offer clinical advantages such as reduced patient pain and a minimized chance of heat-related collateral tissue damage.

Treatment of the hemorrhoids and anal mucosal prolapse using elastic band ligature--early and long term results

THE AIM OF THE STUDY was to evaluate the results of the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and anal mucosal prolapse using elastic band ligation and to compare this method to chosen surgical procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 648 patients (363 males and 285 females). 474 patients were treated using an elastic band ligature and 174 patients underwent surgical hemorrhoidectomy. The average age of the patients in both groups was similar--49 years. The treatment tolerance was evaluated in the prospective study group. The intensity and duration of pain was assessed on the first and second postoperative day using a Verbal Rating Scale.

RESULTS

86.5% of the patients were cured using Barron's procedure, success rate for second-degree hemorrhoids was 89% and for third degree--85.2%. Surgical hemorrhoidectomy was effective in 92% of patients. Early failure of elastic ligature was noted in 2.5% of patients. The recurrences of hemorrhoidal symptoms were observed in 11% of Barron's group and in 8% after hemorrhoidectomy. The intensity of pain was much higher among patients after surgical hemorrhoidectomy. The average of the pain score in the 4th hour was 0.3 for the elastic band ligation and 1.4 for the surgical treatment. In the 24th hour--0.2 and 1.7 respectively. Mean postoperative stay was 3.8 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Rubber band ligation is highly effective and well tolerated. Relatively minor pain following this procedure is found in only 9.5% of patients. The disadvantages of surgical hemorrhoidectomy are: important postoperative pain and long time of wound healing that impair the recovery to professional activity.

Optimal treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids

Hemorrhoids are the most common anorectal complaint, and approximately 10 to 20 percent of patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids require surgery. Symptoms of hemorrhoids, such as painless rectal bleeding, tissue protrusion and mucous discharge, vary. The traditional therapeutic strategies of medicine include surgical, as well as non-surgical, treatment. To alleviate symptoms caused by hemorrhoids, oral treatments, such as fiber, suppositories and Sitz baths have been applied to patients. Other non-surgical treatments, such as infrared photocoagulation, injection sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation have been used to fixate the hemorrhoid's cushion. If non-surgical treatment has no effect, surgical treatments, such as a hemorrhoidectomy, procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids, and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization are used.

[Outpatient treatments of haemorrhoidal disease]

Only three non-surgical treatments of haemorrhoids are clearly validated: infrared coagulation, injection sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation. Those procedures are only indicated for painless symptoms related to internal haemorrhoids, i.e. bleeding at defecation or spontaneously reducible prolapse. Their main interest is to be possible on the outpatient clinic, with a simple anuscope, without enema or anaesthesia, since they are applied to non-sensitive area on the top of internal haemorrhoids. The aim of all these treatments is to create local fibrosis, which reduces vascular tissue and hold rectal mucosa to underlying muscle. Short-dated efficiency of all techniques is similar on bleeding. After one and three years, rubber band ligation is clearly more efficient than other techniques, especially on prolapse. Secondary effects are non-constant and usually minor, as transient pain or tenesmus, and mild bleeding for few days. Infrequent complications may occur, only after haemorrhoidal banding and sclerotherapy, as thrombosis, massive delayed bleeding or local abscess. Exceptional life-threatening pelvic cellulitis cases have been reported.

Long-term outcome and efficacy of endoscopic hemorrhoid ligation for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids

AIM: To assess the long-term outcome of endoscopic hemorrhoid ligation (EHL) for the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids.

METHODS: A total of 759 consecutive patients (415 males and 344 females) were enrolled. Clinical presentations were rectal bleeding (593 patients) and mucosal prolapse (166 patients). All patients received EHL at outpatient clinics. Hemorrhoid severity was classified by Goligher’s grading. The mean follow-up period was 55.4 mo (range, 45-92 mo).

RESULTS: The number of band ligations averaged 2.35 in the first session for bleeding and 2.69 for prolapsed patients. Bleeding was controlled in 587 (98.0%) patients, while prolapse was reduced in 137 (82.5%) patients. After treatment, 93 patients experienced anal pain and 48 patients had mild bleeding. Patient subjective satisfaction was 93.6%. Repeat treatment or surgery was performed if symptoms were not relieved in the first session. In the bleeding group, the recurrence rate was 3.7% (22 patients) at 1 year, and 6.6% and 13.0% at 2 and 5 years. In the prolapsed group, the recurrence rate was 3.0%, 9.6% and 16.9% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION: EHL is an easy and well-tolerated procedure for the treatment of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids, with good long-term results.

Hemorrhoids

Hemorrhoid disease is the most common reason patients seek evaluation by a colon and rectal surgeon. The majority of hemorrhoids can be managed nonoperatively with medical management or office-based procedures. The authors review the anatomy, pathophysiology, presentation, and management of hemorrhoids.

[Nonsurgical therapy of hemorrhoids]

Hemorrhoids are a clinical and anatomical subject that has not been completely investigated. A link between the anatomy and the symptoms has still not been established. For this reason, it is difficult to class the different treatments. Non-surgical treatment is intended not to remove but to reposition and hold the hemorrhoids in an anatomically correct position and the reduce the vascularity. Different techniques have been studies but not all of them have been approved. For the moment, the recognised techniques include: infrared therapy, sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation. Cryotherapy has not been studied in controlled studies. One hopes that new techniques such as Doppler-guided artery ligation will soon be tested and validated.

Randomized prospective study of endoscopic rubber band ligation compared with bipolar coagulation for chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, complications, success rate, recurrence rate at 1 year, and crossovers of rubber band ligation (RBL) with those of bipolar electrocoagulation (BPEC) treatment for chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients of mean age 51.5 years, who had rectal bleeding from grade II or III hemorrhoids and in whom intensive medical therapy failed, were randomized in a prospective study comparing RBL with BPEC. Treatment failure was predefined as continued bleeding, occurrence of a major complication, or failure to reduce the size of all internal hemorrhoidal segments to grade I in < or =3 treatments. Patients were followed up for 1 year.

RESULTS

With similar patients, rectal bleeding and other symptoms were controlled with significantly fewer treatments of RBL than of BPEC (2.3+/-0.2 vs. 3.8+/-0.4, P<0.05), and RBL had a significantly higher success rate (92% vs. 62%, P<0.05). RBL had more cases of severe pain during treatment (8% vs. 0%, P<0.05), but significantly fewer failures and crossovers (8% vs. 38%). Symptomatic recurrence at 1 year was 10% RBL and 15% BPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with chronically bleeding grade II or III internal hemorrhoids that are unresponsive to medical therapy, safety and complication rates of banding and BPEC were similar. The success rate was significantly higher with RBL than with BPEC. Symptom recurrence rates at 1 year were similar.

Rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

PURPOSE

To compare the results of rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease through the analysis of the incidence of complications after each treatment and respective success rate.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with first, second or third degree hemorrhoidal disease were randomized to receive treatment with either rubber band ligation (n=23) or infrared photocoagulation (n=25). Each patient was assessed at 1 week and 4 week intervals after treatment. We compared the incidence of complications and efficiency of each treatment modality and Qui-square, Fisher's Exact Test and Student's t Test were used to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Bleeding occured in eight (34,7%) patients treated with rubber band ligation and in four (16,0%) after infrared photocoagulation (p=0,243). Thirteen (52,0%) patients felt pain during infrared photocoagulation and 9 (39,1%) after rubber band ligation (p=0,546). After rubber band ligation, 14 (60,8%) required medication for pain relief. One patient (4,0%) required medication after infrared photocoagulation (p<0,001). Three (13,0%) patients treated with rubber band ligator and 1 (4,0%) treated with infrared photocoagulation had symptomatic mucosal ulcers. Perianal dermatitis occured in two (8,0%) patients treated with infrared photocoagulation and one patient (4,3%) was observed to have prolapsed thrombosed piles after rubber band ligation. One month after treatment, 17 of 23 patients treated with rubber band ligation (73,9%) and 18 of 25 patients treated with infrared photocoagulation were asymptomatic. Rubber band ligation treated bleeding and prolapse in 90,0% and 82,4% respectively. Infrared photocoagulation treats bleeding and prolapse in 93,7% and 87,5% respectively. Those differences are not significant.

CONCLUSION

Rubber band ligation causes significantly more pain than infrared photocoagulation during the first week after the procedures and their success rate are not different after four weeks of treatment.

Risk of late bleeding following hemorrhoidal banding in patients on antithrombotic prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

The risk of bleeding following rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids is 1%-2%. This risk may be increased in patients taking antithrombotic therapy. The goal of the current study was to find a safer approach to banding without increasing the risk of bleeding.

METHODS

This retrospective review identified patients undergoing banding while on antithrombotic therapy. These medications were held for 7-10 days following the procedure. The number of bands placed while on antithrombotic therapy and their post band complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 605 bands placed on 364 patients taking antithrombotic medications. There were 23 complications involving bleeding, a value that was not statistically different from those not taking antithrombotic therapy. Patients on clopidogrel experienced 50% of the significant bleeding episodes and 18% of the insignificant bleeding episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Holding antithrombotic medication following banding appears to equalize the risk of bleeding to that of patients not taking antithrombotic medications. Patients taking clopidogrel may be at higher risk for bleeding complications.

Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases

AIM: To study the results for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids using rubber band ligation (RBL) method.

METHODS: A retrospective study for 750 patients who came to the colorectal unit from June, 1998 to September, 2006, data was retrieved from archived files. RBL was performed using the Mc Gown applicator on an outpatient basis. The patients were asked to return to out-patient clinic for follow up at 2 wk, 1 mo, 6 mo and through telephone call every 6 mo for 2 years).

RESULTS: After RBL, 696 patients (92.8%) were cured with no difference in outcome for second or third degree hemorrhoids (P = 0.31). Symptomatic recurrence was detected in 11.04% after 2 years. A total of 52 patients (6.93%) had 77 complications from RBL which required no hospitalization. Complications were pain, rectal bleeding and vaso-vagal symptoms (4.13%, 4.13% and 1.33% of patients, respectively). At 1 mo there were a significant improvement in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in five items, while after 2 years there were improvement in all items over baseline, but not significant. No significant manometric changes after band ligation.

CONCLUSION: RBL is a simple, safe and effective method for treating symptomatic second and third degree hemorrhoids as an out patient procedure with significant improvement in quality of life. RBL doesn’t alter ano-rectal functions.

Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids

Rubber band ligation is a widely performed procedure in the outpatient setting for symptomatic haemorrhoids. This method is generally considered to be safe and easily performed. However, there have been reports of severe sepsis following interventions for haemorrhoids and the majority of patients had undergone rubber band ligation. We present a patient who had undergone elective rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids who presented with severe anal pain with difficulty in micturition. She deteriorated rapidly over a period of 3 days and succumbed to fulminant perineal sepsis.

Can 5-aminosalicylic acid suppository decrease the pain after rectal band ligation?

AIM: To investigate the effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) suppositories on rectal band ligation-induced pain.

METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized into two treatment groups.

RESULTS: Our results showed that there was no difference between 5-ASA suppository group and the control group for pain control.

CONCLUSION: 5-ASA may be an alternative treatment for hemorrhoids; however, it does not affect the rectal band ligation-induced pain.

The management of haemorrhoids

Haemorrhoidal disease is common, but there is still no consensus on optimal treatment. The most appropriate treatment is tailored to the individual patient. This article defines and classifies haemorrhoids, reviewing the efficacy of current treatments including the latest techniques.

Pylephlebitis and pyogenic liver abscesses: a complication of hemorrhoidal banding

Hemorrhoidal banding is a well-established and safe outpatient procedure. Septic complications of hemorrhoidal banding are rare but can be fatal. The first case of pylephlebitis (septic portal vein thrombosis) and pyogenic liver abscess following hemorrhoidal banding in a 49-year-old man with diabetes is reported in the present study. Risk factors, management and the role of prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients are discussed. Caution against hemorrhoidal banding in immunosuppressed patients, including patients with diabetes, is warranted.

Combined colonoscopy and three-quadrant hemorrhoidal ligation: 500 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining outpatient colonoscopy with simultaneous three-quadrant hemorrhoidal ligation in patients with symptomatic internal hemorrhoidal disease.

METHODS

A four-year analysis of patients undergoing combined colonoscopy and synchronous three-quadrant hemorrhoidal ligation was performed. Indications for the procedure were patients with symptomatic internal hemorrhoids who had failed conservative management and who also required colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy was performed under moderate sedation, immediately followed by synchronous three-quadrant hemorrhoidal ligation, using a TriView anoscope and Short-Shot hemorrhoidal ligator. Patients undergoing this procedure were entered in a computer database, and outcomes were tracked. Patients requiring repeat ligation, surgical intervention, or readmission within 30 days were identified and further analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients underwent colonoscopy with simultaneous three-quadrant internal hemorrhoid ligation during the study period. Four hundred sixty-seven patients (93.4 percent) had complete resolution of their symptoms and required no further treatment. Thirty-three patients (6.6 percent) required repeat ligation, and 11 (2.2 percent) required completion surgical hemorrhoidectomy for persistent symptoms. Fifty-two patients (10.4 percent) required incidental biopsy/polypectomy during the colonoscopy. Two incidental colon carcinomas were identified, and ligation was deferred. No patients required admission for bleeding after the procedure. There were no cases of pelvic sepsis, and no patients required emergent surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining colonoscopy with three-quadrant hemorrhoidal ligation is a safe and effective method of treating symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. The procedure is convenient for both physician and patient and makes more efficient use of time and resources.

Bulk agent Plantago ovata after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure

The aim of this study was to determine usefulness of the bulk agent Plantago ovata in reducing postoperative pain and tenesmus after open hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan with Ligasure). Ninety-eight patients were randomized into two groups of 49 patients each. In both groups Milligan-Morgan open hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure was performed. The first group received postoperatively two sachets daily of 3.26 g of the bulk agent, Plantago ovata, for 20 days. The control group was treated postoperatively with glycerin oil. There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender distribution and hemorrhoid grading, between the two groups. The pain score after first defecation (p < 0.001) and after 10 days (p < 0.01) and the global pain score (p < 0.001) was statistically significantly lower in the group treated with Plantago ovata, while there was no statistically significant difference in the pain level after 20 days (p > 0.05). The hospital stay was statistically significantly shorter in the group receiving Plantago ovata (2.6 +/- 0.6 vs 3.9 +/- 0.7 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of tenesmus was higher in the control group (40.8% vs 10.2%, p < 0.01). Treating patients with Plantago ovata after open hemorrhoidectomy, reduces pain, tenesmus rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay.

Hemorroidectomia: estudo de 2.417 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia para tratamento da doença hemorroidária

Em 34.000 pacientes coloproctológicos foi feito o diagnóstico de DH, como doença coloproctológica principal, em 9.289 pacientes (27,3%), dos quais 2.417 (26,0%) foram submetidos à hemorroidectomia. O objetivo deste trabalho é estudar estes 2.417 pacientes submetidos à hemorroidectomia, com análise dos aspectos epidemiológicos (idades, sexos), dos aspectos envolvendo a cirurgia (posições do pacientes, anestesias usadas e técnicas cirúrgicas praticadas e complicações cirúrgicas), comparando os achados com os da literatura correlata. Dos 2.417 pacientes operados a maioria apresentava hemorróidas de terceiro (30,5%) e de quarto (60,2%). Predominou, de forma estatisticamente significativa, a incidência de DH entre mulheres (5.007 mulheres, 53,9%) sobre homens (4.282 homens, 46,1%), bem como de cirurgias (1.330 mulheres ou 26,6% de 9.289 portadores de DH ou 55,0% dos 2.417 operados). A média etária dos pacientes por ocasião do diagnóstico foi 39,9 anos, sendo 74,8% entre 21 e 50 anos de idade; e a média etária por ocasião da cirurgia foi 41,6 anos, sendo 71,8% entre 21 e 50 anos de idade. Foram encontradas, por ocasião do diagnóstico da DH 1.122 casos (12,1%) de doenças anais concomitantes, sobretudo fissuras anais (5,8%) e hipertrofia de papilas anais (3,4%). A incidência de DAC operadas foi de 30,1% (729 pacientes), sendo a fissurectomia (13,1%) e a papilectomia (11,0%) as duas DAC mais comumente operadas em concomitância à DH. Dos 2.417 pacientes operados de DH 45 pacientes (1,9%) foram operados de outras doenças que não no ânus, sobretudo plástica de períneo e varizes de membros inferiores, tendo, ainda, 26 pacientes (2,0%) sido operados em situações patológicas e fisiológicas especiais, sobretudo gravidez (8 casos, 0,3%). A anestesia mais usada foi a peridural (42,3%) e a local associada à analgesia (34,9%); as posições na mesa cirúrgica mais usadas foram o decúbito lateral esquerdo de Sims (58,4%) e "em canivete" (40,1%); e a técnica cirúrgica mais usada foi a técnica aberta (Milligan-Morgan) (2.014 casos, 83,3%). Foram observadas 76 complicações (3,1%), sobretudo estenoses anais (40 casos, 1,8%) e hemorragia anal (21 casos, 0,9%).

A prospective audit of early pain and patient satisfaction following out-patient band ligation of haemorrhoids

INTRODUCTION

Information regarding early morbidity, pain and patient satisfaction following band ligation of haemorrhoids is limited. This is the first report to address these issues specifically.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 183 patients underwent the procedure over a 10-month period. Prospective data were collected using a detailed structured questionnaire regarding symptoms, analgesia requirements and patient satisfaction in the following week.

RESULTS

The response rate was 74% (135/183). Pain scores were highest 4 h following the procedure. At 1 week, 75% of patients were pain-free, with 9 (7%) still experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. About 65% required oral analgesia, most frequently on the day of procedure. Rectal bleeding occurred in 86 patients (65%) on the day after banding, persisting in 32 (24%) at 1 week. Vaso-vagal symptoms occurred in 41 patients (30%) and were commonest at the time of banding. Eighty patients (59%) were satisfied with their experience and would undergo the procedure again. Patients requiring oral analgesia and those experiencing bleeding or vaso-vagal symptoms were significantly less likely to be satisfied with the procedure. Only 57% of the patients surveyed would recommend the procedure to a friend.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this large cohort of patients suggest that discomfort and bleeding may persist for a week or more following banding of haemorrhoids. Patients should be aware of this in order to make an informed decision as to whether to undergo the procedure, and surgeons should investigate ways of reducing it. Patient satisfaction may be further improved by more accurate counselling regarding the incidence of specific complications.

Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND AND METHOD

This review compares the two most popular treatments for haemorrhoids, namely rubber band ligation (RBL) and excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Randomized trials were identified from the major electronic databases. Symptom control, retreatment, postoperative pain, complications, time off work and patient satisfaction were assessed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference with 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) were estimated using a random-effects model for dichotomous and continuous outcomes respectively.

RESULTS

Three trials met the inclusion criteria and all were of poor methodological quality. Complete remission of haemorrhoidal symptoms was better after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 1.68 (95 per cent c.i 1.00 to 2.83)). There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (I(2) = 90.5 per cent; P < 0.001). Fewer patients required retreatment after haemorrhoidectomy (RR 0.20 (95 per cent c.i 0.09 to 0.40)), but anal stenosis, postoperative haemorrhage and incontinence to flatus were more common with this operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Haemorrhoidectomy produced better long-term symptom control in patients with grade III haemorrhoids, but was associated with more postoperative complications than RBL.